Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) level, but not ACE gene polymorphism, is associated with prognosis of COVID-19 infection: Implications for diabetes and hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system was shown to be activated in severe COVID-19 infection. We aimed to investigate the relationship between angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) levels, ACE gene polymorphism, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), and hypertension (HT) and the prognosis of COVID-19 infection. METHODS: This cross-sectional study analyzed the clinical features of adult patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. ACE gene analysis and ACE level measurements were performed. The patients were grouped according to ACE gene polymorphism (DD, ID or II), disease severity (mild, moderate, or severe), and the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme inhibitor (DPP4i), ACE-inhibitor (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mortality were also recorded. RESULTS: A total of 266 patients were enrolled. Gene analysis detected DD polymorphism in the ACE 1 gene in 32.7% (n = 87), ID in 51.5% (n = 137), and II in 15.8% (n = 42) of the patients. ACE gene polymorphisms were not associated with disease severity, ICU admission, or mortality. ACE levels were higher in patients who died (p = 0.004) or were admitted to the ICU (p<0.001) and in those with severe disease compared to cases with mild (p = 0.023) or moderate (p<0.001) disease. HT, T2DM, and ACEi/ARB or DPP4i use were not associated with mortality or ICU admission. ACE levels were similar in patients with or without HT (p = 0.374) and with HT using or not using ACEi/ARB (p = 0.999). They were also similar in patients with and without T2DM (p = 0.062) and in those with and without DPP4i treatment (p = 0.427). ACE level was a weak predictor of mortality but an important predictor of ICU admission. It predicted ICU admission in total (cutoff value >37.092 ng/mL, AUC: 0.775, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that higher ACE levels, but not ACE gene polymorphism, ACEi/ARB or DPP4i use, were associated with the prognosis of COVID-19 infection. The presence of HT and T2DM and ACEi/ARB or DPP4i use were not associated with mortality or ICU admission.

Free and Bioavailable Vitamin D Levels of Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Association with Bone Metabolism.

Aim: Vitamin D deficiency is known to be associated with metabolic bone diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate vitamin D and calculated free and bioactive vitamin D levels of type 1 diabetic patients and to evaluate the association with bone turnover markers. Method: This cross-sectional study includes 60 patients admitted to endocrinology outpatient clinic with diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus and 60 controls. Weight, height and waist circumference were recorded and blood samples were taken for measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase (bone-ALP), c-telopeptide. Free and bioavailable vitamin D levels were calculated with formula. Results: Vitamin D levels of type 1 diabetic patients were significantly higher (p = 0.01). Parathormone levels of the group with vitamin D level under 20 ng/ml was significantly higher (p = 0.029). VDBP levels were similar in both groups. Correlation analysis of free and bioavailable vitamin D level with osteocalcin, c-telopeptide, bone alkaline phosphatase revealed only a weak significant correlation between free vitamin D and osteocalcin (r = -0.201; p = 0.028). A negative correlation was determined between 25(OH)D and parathormone levels (r = -0.294; p < 0.005). Serum osteocalcin, bone alkaline phosphatase and c-telopeptide levels of control group were significantly higher. Conclusion: 25(OH)D levels of the study population was extremely low. The measurement of VDBP and calculated free and bioactive vitamin D levels did not show a better correlation with bone turnover markers according to 25(OH)D levels.

Effect of denosumab treatment on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in osteoporotic patients: real-life experience 2-year follow-up.

Denosumab leads to improvements in BMD levels and is a well-tolerated agent according to results of randomized controlled studies but results in real-life setting are important to evaluate drug adherence and real-life efficiency. In this study, we present the results of 305 patients that were treated with denosumab in our clinic. INTRODUCTION: The long-term efficacy of anti-osteoclastic drugs in treatment of osteoporosis is well known. Denosumab, a novel human monoclonal antibody, is an anti-osteoclastic agent that has been shown to lead to reductions in vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fracture risk in randomized and observational studies. Real-life data of this agent is increasing. In this study, we presented our real-life data about the 2-year follow-up of patients under denosumab treatment. METHODS: Osteoporotic patients who were treated with at least one denosumab injection between 2014 and 2020 years were included. Clinical and demographic data, bone turnover markers, and radiological reports (bone mineral densitometry (BMD), vertebral x-ray) were obtained from patient files retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 305 patients (f/m: 275/30, 68.1 ± 11.05 years) were included. The median injection number was 4 (1-10). Two hundred seventy-three patients (89.8%) were persistent on treatment at the 12th month; 175 patients (57.3%) were persistent at 24th month. Sixty-eight patients (22%) were not using denosumab anymore, 55 of the patients were not continuing by doctor desicion and 13 were not continuing due to patient-related causes. Median BMD levels significantly increased from 0.809 (0.2-1.601, IQR: 0.136) to 0.861 (0.517-1.607, IQR: 0.14) in L1-L4 and from 0.702 (0.349-0.997, IQR: 0.125) to 0.745 (0.508-1.008, IQR: 0.137) in femur area at the 24th month of treatment. An improvement of 8.04% in L1-L4 BMD and 4.5% in femur neck BMD levels at the 24th month of treatment was observed. There was a significant decrease in bone turnover markers at the 24th month of treatment. CONCLUSION: In our group of patients under denosumab treatment, 53% of persistence was found at 24 months and associated with improvement in BMD levels without any significant side effects except one case with urticarial reaction. Denosumab leads to improvements in BMD levels and is a well-tolerated agent in a real-life setting comparable to results of randomized controlled studies in patients with different comorbidities.