Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Food Prot ; 69(8): 1966-70, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16924925

RESUMO

This study was conducted to determine optimal buffer pH, extraction procedure, and temperature for detecting central nervous system (CNS) tissue on meat surfaces and on carcass-splitting band saw blades using swab sampling. Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is restricted to CNS tissue and has been used as a marker for CNS tissue presence in meat products. Sample preparation, extraction procedure, and extraction temperature of glial fibrillary acidic protein fluorescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (GFAP F-ELISA) were modified to detect CNS tissue on meat surfaces and on carcass-splitting band saw blades. Maximum GFAP recovery was observed with an extraction buffer pH of 7.4. Extracting samples at room temperature by vortexing for 30 s in 1 ml of extraction buffer (phosphate-buffered saline [pH 7.4] plus 0.05% sodium dodecyl sulfate) consistently provided detection of GFAP on meat surfaces contaminated with 500 microg of spinal cord suspension per 50 cm2 and on carcass-splitting band saw blades contaminated with 20 microg of spinal cord suspension per 50 cm2. Recovery of GFAP was not affected by storing samples overnight at 4 degrees C. The current studies demonstrate the effectiveness of modified sampling procedures and preparations, sample extraction buffer pH, and extraction temperatures. These modifications introduced to the original F-ELISA sampling protocol result in asensitive and repeatable assay for detection of CNS tissue on meat surfaces and on carcass-splitting band saw blades.


Assuntos
Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Contaminação de Equipamentos , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida/análise , Carne/análise , Animais , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Concentração de Íons de Hidrogênio , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Temperatura
2.
J Food Prot ; 69(3): 644-50, 2006 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16541698

RESUMO

Three methods are widely used in the United States to detect the presence of central nervous system (CNS) tissue in meat products: the fluorescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (F-ELISA), developed in this laboratory, the colorimetric Ridascreen Risk Material 10/5 ELISA (R-ELISA), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service immunohistochemical (IHC) procedure. These assays are based on the immunological detection of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a neural antigen largely restricted to the CNS. The objective of the current study was to compare the sensitivity and repeatability of these tests for detecting the presence of neural tissue in meat. Ground beef spiked with 0.05 to 0.5% of bovine brain, spinal cord (SC), or dorsal root ganglia, as well as advanced meat recovery samples, were evaluated by each of the three GFAP detection procedures. Interassay coefficients of variation for the F-ELISA GFAP standards were 7 to 25%, and intra-assay variation due to sampling and extraction of spiked ground beef was 7 to 13% for SC and 8 to 14% for brain (n = 10). The F-ELISA was the most sensitive of the methods tested, capable of detecting 0.3 ng GFAP standard per well and the presence of 0.05% brain and SC in meat. The R-ELISA standards produced highly variable results (up to 36% variation) and, as a result, none of these standards were different from zero (n = 26). The R-ELISA resulted in high sample variation in SC-spiked ground beef samples (coefficients of variation were 23 to 50%) and did not detect the presence of brain contamination. After modification of the R-ELISA sampling and extraction methods, SC-spiked sample variation was reduced to 16 to 20%, and sensitivity was improved from 0.3 to 0.2% SC, although brain tissue was still not detected. The IHC analysis of CNS-adulterated ground beef had a sensitivity of 0.2% SC and 0.05% brain, with false-negative rates of 10 to 20% at and above the stated sensitivities. None of the methods examined detected dorsal root ganglia contamination. The F-ELISA detected the presence of CNS contamination in 20% of the advanced meat recovery samples, compared to 3.5 to 5% for the R-ELISA and 2% for IHC. This study suggests that the F-ELISA is much more sensitive and repeatable than either the R-ELISA or the IHC procedure method for the detection of CNS tissue in meat products.


Assuntos
Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida/análise , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Carne/análise , Animais , Qualidade de Produtos para o Consumidor , Proteína Glial Fibrilar Ácida/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Produtos da Carne/análise , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA