Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 87(5): 1198-1203, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29309782

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The use of a transparent cap has been found to be effective for retrieval of an esophageal foreign body. However, data on the use of a cap in food bolus obstruction (FBO) are limited. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a cap-assisted technique compared with conventional techniques in removal of FBO. METHODS: All patients who underwent an endoscopy for boneless FBO between 2011 and 2016 were prospectively recruited. The measured outcomes were procedure time, success rate of food bolus (FB) extraction, rate of en bloc removal, procedure-related adverse events, and length of hospital stay (LOS) between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Of the 315 patients who had an endoscopy for FBO, 48 (15.2%) had spontaneous passage of FB and 267 (84.8%) had impacted FB. Sixty-eight (25%) patients had the "push" maneuver, and 199 (75%) patients had the "pull" maneuver to remove FB. Of those who had the "pull" maneuver, a cap was used for 93 and conventional device(s) for 106. The use of a cap was associated with a shorter procedural time (34.3 ± 8.0 minutes versus 43.3 ± 22.6 minutes, P = .003), a higher rate of en bloc removal (87.3% versus 22.8%, P < .001), a lower rate of adverse events (0/93 versus 7/106, P = .01), and a shorter LOS (1.0 ± 0.6 days versus 1.6 ± 1.4 days, P = .0017). CONCLUSION: The cap-assisted technique has been found to be effective and safe in removal of esophageal FBO. This technique was associated with a shorter procedural time and a reduced LOS compared with conventional techniques. However, these findings require further validation in a randomized control study.


Assuntos
Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/instrumentação , Esôfago/cirurgia , Corpos Estranhos/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório/métodos , Feminino , Alimentos , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
World J Gastroenterol ; 28(47): 6632-6661, 2022 Dec 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36620337

RESUMO

An expanding range of advanced mucosal imaging technologies have been developed with the goal of improving the detection and characterization of lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. Many technologies have targeted colorectal neoplasia given the potential for intervention prior to the development of invasive cancer in the setting of widespread surveillance programs. Improvement in adenoma detection reduces miss rates and prevents interval cancer development. Advanced imaging technologies aim to enhance detection without significantly increasing procedural time. Accurate polyp characterisation guides resection techniques for larger polyps, as well as providing the platform for the "resect and discard" and "do not resect" strategies for small and diminutive polyps. This review aims to collate and summarise the evidence regarding these technologies to guide colonoscopic practice in both interventional and non-interventional endoscopists.


Assuntos
Adenoma , Pólipos do Colo , Neoplasias Colorretais , Humanos , Pólipos do Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Pólipos do Colo/cirurgia , Colonoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Adenoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenoma/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA