[Cost-effectiveness analysis of rabies immunization strategy based on dynamic-decision tree model].

Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of different immunization strategies for rabies in China, and to provide a reference for determining the optimal immunization strategy. Methods: The system dynamics model was used to simulate the epidemic of canine rabies and a decision tree model was conducted to analysis different immune strategies. Relevant probabilities were obtained through literature search and on-site investigation. Sensitivity analysis was used to explore the important influenced factors. Results: At baseline, from a social perspective, 70% vaccination of dogs was the optimal strategy compared to current vaccination strategy (43% vaccination in dogs, human category-Ⅱ exposure vaccination/category-Ⅲ exposure vaccination combined with RIG). The total cost was 14 084 354 CNY, and the total utility value was 22 078 616.23 QALYs, and the incremental cost-utility ratio was-62 148 147 CNY/QALY; if human vaccination was considered, 55% vaccination of dogs combined with strategy one was the optimal strategy, its incremental cost-utility ratio was-444 620 557 CNY/QALY. The probability that an injured dog carries rabies virus was the most sensitive parameter. When it was greater than 0.005 03, strategy four was the optimal strategy. When it was less than 82/100 000, strategy one was the optimal strategy; when it was between 82/100 000 and 120/100 000, strategy two was the optimal strategy; when it was between 120/100 000 and 503/100 000, strategy two was the optimal strategy. Conclusion: It was conducive to increase the vaccination coverage of canine for the prevention and control of rabies.

Selecting the optimum conditions for two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis of proteins expressed in Populus euphratica.

We selected the optimum conditions for two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) of proteins expressed in the heteromorphic leaves of Populus euphratica Oliv. by adjusting the isoelectric focusing, the loading quantity, the concentration of the electrophoretic gel, and other parameters. The results of our study showed that protein separation was improved with many clear protein spots observed, and the differentiations were obvious. The findings of this study will be useful for future studies of protein expression in the heteromorphic leaves of P. euphratica.

Phase II study of continuous infusion carmustine and cisplatin followed by cranial irradiation in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the activity and toxicity of carmustine (BCNU) and cisplatin administered as a 72-hour continuous intravenous infusion before radiation in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with a Karnofsky performance status greater than 60 and no prior antineoplastic therapy entered this protocol. The median age of the patients was 55 years. Eighty-eight percent had glioblastoma multiforme and 12% had anaplastic astrocytomas. BCNU (40 mg/m2/d) and cisplatin (40 mg/m2/d) were administered concurrently as a 72-hour infusion every 3 to 4 weeks. Radiation was begun 4 weeks after the third cycle of chemotherapy or earlier for progressive disease. Responses required a > or = 50% reduction in contrast-enhancing volume. RESULTS: Forty patients (77%) completed three chemotherapy infusions, five (10%) received two infusions, and seven (13%) received only one. Fifty-one patients completed radiation. Seventeen (42%) patients with measurable disease had a partial response (PR) to chemotherapy, 23 (53%) had stable disease (SD), and two (4%) had progressive disease (PD) on chemotherapy. The median survival time for all patients was 13 months. Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 62%, 19%, 12%, and 5%, respectively. Grade III to IV leukopenia occurred in 32% of patients; 63% received platelet transfusions and 58% required RBCs. Neutropenic fevers were rare and no intracranial hemorrhages or treatment-related deaths were noted. Nausea, vomiting, peripheral neuropathy, hearing loss, and thromboembolic events were relatively common. CONCLUSION: This chemotherapy regimen appears to have significant activity and may prolong survival in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade astrocytoma.

Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse. Temodal Brain Tumor Group.

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor efficacy and safety profile of temozolomide in patients with malignant astrocytoma at first relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This open-label, multicenter, phase II trial enrolled 162 patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). After central histologic review, 111 patients were confirmed to have had an anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma. Chemotherapy-naive patients were treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m(2)/d. Patients previously treated with chemotherapy received temozolomide 150 mg/m(2)/d; the dose could be increased to 200 mg/m(2)/d in the absence of grade 3/4 toxicity. Therapy was administered orally on the first 5 days of a 28-day cycle. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months, the primary protocol end point, was 46% (95% confidence interval, 38% to 54%). The median PFS was 5.4 months, and PFS at 12 months was 24%. The median overall survival was 13.6 months, and the 6- and 12-month survival rates were 75% and 56%, respectively. The objective response rate determined by independent central review of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans of the ITT population was 35% (8% complete response [CR], 27% partial response [PR]), with an additional 26% of patients with stable disease (SD). The median PFS for patients with SD was 4.4 months, with 33% progression-free at 6 months. Maintenance of progression-free status and objectively assessed response (CR/PR/SD) were both associated with health-related quality-of-life (HQL) benefits. Adverse events were mild to moderate, with hematologic side effects occurring in less than 10% of patients. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide demonstrated good single-agent activity, an acceptable safety profile, and documented HQL benefits in patients with recurrent AA.

Edema associated with I-125 or Pd-103 prostate brachytherapy and its impact on post-implant dosimetry: an analysis based on serial CT acquisition.

PURPOSE: To characterize the magnitude and duration of post-implant edema following the implantation of I-125 or Pd-103 seeds into the prostate and to investigate its effect on the CT-based calculation of the total dose delivered by the implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pre-implant CT scan and 3 to 5 serial post-implant CT scans were obtained on 10 patients who received either I-125 or Pd-103 seed implants. None of the patients received hormone therapy. The magnitude and duration of edema were determined from the change in the spatial distribution of the implanted seeds as the edema resolves. Dose volume histograms were compiled to determine the percentage of the prostate volume that received a dose equal to, or greater than, the prescribed dose. RESULTS: The magnitude of the edema, expressed as the ratio of the post- to pre-implant volume on the day of the procedure, ranged from 1.33 to 1.96 (mean 1.52). The edema decreased exponentially with time; however, the edema half-life (time for the edema to decrease by 1/2) varied from 4 to 25 days (mean 9.3 days). As the edema resolved, the percentage of the prostate that received a dose equal to or greater than the prescribed dose increased by at least 7% in 7 of the 10 patients and increased by more than 15% in 2. In those patients in whom dose coverage was unaffected by the resolution of edema, more than 90% of the prostate was covered by the prescribed dose in the initial CT scan. CONCLUSION: Post-implant edema increased the prostate volume by factors which ranged from 1.33 to 1.96 (mean: 1.52). The edema resolved exponentially with an edema half-life which varied from 4 to 25 days (mean: 9.3 days). Edema had a significant effect on the post-implant dosimetry in 7 of 10 cases. Factors that affect the impact of edema on the dosimetry are the magnitude of the edema and the planned margin between the prescribed isodose line and the periphery of the prostate.

Effect of edema on the post-implant dosimetry of an I-125 prostate implant: a case study.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of post-implant edema on the CT-based calculation of the total dose delivered by an I-125 prostate implant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CT scans of a transperineal I-125 prostate implant were obtained 1 and 39-days post-implant. Changes in the prostate dimensions were determined from changes in the spatial distribution of the I-125 seeds. The total dose delivered to the target volume was computed from each CT scan, and the results compared. RESULTS: The volume of the prostate decreased by approximately 17% during the 38-day interval between the first and second CT scans. As a result, the radiation dose computed from the second CT scan was 13% higher. CONCLUSION: Post-implant edema can cause a significant underestimation of the radiation dose delivered by an I-125 prostate implant. Similar analysis should be carried out among a larger cohort of patients to confirm or refute these observations.

Dosimetric effects of edema in permanent prostate seed implants: a rigorous solution.

PURPOSE: To derive a rigorous analytic solution to the dosimetric effects of prostate edema so that its impact on the conventional pre-implant and post-implant dosimetry can be studied for any given radioactive isotope and edema characteristics. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The edema characteristics observed by Waterman et al (Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys, 41:1069-1077; 1998) was used to model the time evolution of the prostate and the seed locations. The total dose to any part of prostate tissue from a seed implant was calculated analytically by parameterizing the dose fall-off from a radioactive seed as a single inverse power function of distance, with proper account of the edema-induced time evolution. The dosimetric impact of prostate edema was determined by comparing the dose calculated with full consideration of prostate edema to that calculated with the conventional dosimetry approach where the seed locations and the target volume are assumed to be stationary. RESULTS: A rigorous analytic solution on the relative dosimetric effects of prostate edema was obtained. This solution proved explicitly that the relative dosimetric effects of edema, as found in the previous numerical studies by Yue et. al. (Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 43, 447-454, 1999), are independent of the size and the shape of the implant target volume and are independent of the number and the locations of the seeds implanted. It also showed that the magnitude of relative dosimetric effects is independent of the location of dose evaluation point within the edematous target volume. It implies that the relative dosimetric effects of prostate edema are universal with respect to a given isotope and edema characteristic. A set of master tables for the relative dosimetric effects of edema were obtained for a wide range of edema characteristics for both (125)I and (103)Pd prostate seed implants. CONCLUSIONS: A rigorous analytic solution of the relative dosimetric effects of prostate edema has been derived for a class of edema characterized by Waterman et al. The solution proved that the dosimetric effects caused by the edema are universal functions of edema characteristics for a given isotope. It provides an efficient tool to examine the relative dosimetric effects of edema for any given edema characteristics and for any isotopes that may be considered for prostate implants.

Optimum timing for image-based dose evaluation of 125I and 103PD prostate seed implants.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Image-based dose evaluation of permanent brachytherapy implants for prostate cancer is important for optimal patient management after implantation. Because of edema caused by the surgical procedure in the implantation, if the dose evaluation is based on the images obtained too early after implantation, dose coverage will usually be underestimated. Conversely, if the images are obtained too late, the dose coverage will be overestimated. This study uses a biomathematical model to simulate edema and its resolution on 29 patients, so that the optimum time to obtain image scans and perform dose evaluation can be investigated and estimated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Edema of a prostate and its resolution has been shown to follow an exponential function V(t) = V(0)(1 + deltaV[e-0.693t/Te - 1]) where deltaV is the initial relative increase in the prostate volume due to edema (and is related to edema magnitude), and Te (edema half-life) is the time for the edema to decrease by half in volume. In this study, edema was simulated by increasing the volume of preimplant prostate (obtained from ultrasound volume study) to a given magnitude of edema. Similarly, the locations of planned seeds were changed to their corresponding locations in the edematous prostate proportionally. The edema was then allowed to resolve according to the exponential function. The correct dose distribution was calculated by taking into account the dynamic variations of the prostate volume, seed locations, and source strengths with respect to time. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) were then generated from this dose distribution. The conventional postimplant DVHs, which assume the prostate volume and seed locations are as in the image scans and constant in time, were also calculated based on the simulated image scans for various days postimplantation. The conventional DVHs of prostate on various days after implantation were compared to the DVH calculated assuming dynamic conditions. The optimum timing for conventional postimplant dose evaluation was identified as the time at which a minimum difference between the conventional DVH and the dynamic model DVH was achieved. The analysis was done on 29 prostate seed implant patients for both 125I and 103Pd. The edema magnitude was assumed to be 30%, 40%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of original prostate volume, and the half-life of edema was assumed to be 4, 7, 10, 15, 20, and 25 days. In this study, the original volume of prostate varied from 17 cm3 to 91 cm3, and number of seeds in the implants varied from 57 to 119. RESULTS: The optimum timing was mainly dependent on the half-lives of edema and radionuclides, and varied slightly with edema magnitude, prostate volume, and number of seeds. It can be expressed as a function of edema half-life in the form of C0 + C1exp(-C2Te). However, if the dose evaluation was performed based on the image scans taken too early or too late, the error became larger, as the edema magnitude was larger. By averaging all 29 patients and various edemas, it was found that for 125I seed implants, if the postimplant dose evaluation is performed based on image scans taken between 5 and 9 weeks, the average error will be less than 5%, with a maximum possible error less than 10% in 80% coverage dose; for 103Pd seed implants, if the postimplant dose evaluation is performed based on image scans taken between 2 and 4 weeks, the average error will be less than 5%, with a maximum error less than 15% in 80% coverage dose. Because of edema, a conventional preimplant plan also overestimates dose coverage of prostate. On the average, a standard preimplant planning overestimates dose coverage by about 6% for 125I implants and 14% for 103Pd implants in our study. CONCLUSION: Based on the dynamic model, the optimum timing of image scans for postimplant dose evaluation of prostate seed implantation is 7 weeks postimplantation for 125I implants and about 3 weeks for 103Pd implants. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

A dynamic model for the estimation of optimum timing of computed tomography scan for dose evaluation of 125I or 103Pd seed implant of prostate.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The dosimetric evaluation of permanent 125I or 103Pd prostate implant is based on the assumption that both prostate and seeds are static throughout the entire treatment time which lasts months. However, the prostate is often edematous after the surgical implantation of seeds. Therefore, both the volume of the prostate and the seed locations change dynamically as the edema resolves. This effect has impact on the validity of postimplant analysis based upon a CT scan. If a CT scan is taken too early after implantation while there is edema in the prostate, the dose delivered by the implant may be underestimated. If the imaging is delayed too long, the dose may be overestimated. The magnitude of this effect depends on both of the half-life of the isotope used and the half-life and magnitude of the edema. This study describes a dynamic biomathematical model which takes edema into account in calculating the dose delivered by the implant and is used to investigate the optimum time to obtain the postimplant CT scan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dynamic biomathematical model is a numerical integration of the accumulated dose in which the prostate dimensions, the seed locations, and the source strength are all functions of time. The function which describes the change in prostate dimensions and seed locations as a function of time was determined in a separate study by analysis of serial postimplant CT scans. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the prostate for the total dose generated by the dynamic model are compared to DVHs generated by CT scans simulated for postimplant intervals ranging from 0 to 300 days after the implantation for 30 different combinations of the magnitude and duration of edema. RESULTS: DVHs of the prostate calculated by taking edema into account show that the time of obtaining a CT scan for postimplant analysis is critical to the accuracy of dose evaluations. The comparison of the DVHs generated by the dynamic model to those generated by the CT scans simulated for a range of postimplant intervals show that obtaining the CT scan too early tends to underestimate the total dose while obtaining the CT scan after the edema is resolved tends to overestimate it. The results show that the optimum timing of the CT scan depends upon the duration of the edema and the half-life of the radioisotope used. It is almost independent of the magnitude of the edema. Thus, a unique optimum time window for the imaging study cannot be defined for either 125I or 103Pd implants. However, an optimum time window can be identified for which the calculated dose, on the average, will generally differ from the actual dose by less than 5%, with a maximum error not exceeding 15%. Such a window is 4 to 10 weeks after the implantation for an 125I implant, and 2 to 4 weeks for a 103Pd implant. CONCLUSIONS: A dynamic biomathematical model to correct for the effects of edema in calculating the total dose delivered by an 125I or 103Pd seed implant has been developed. The model has been used to investigate the optimum time window during which the postimplant CT scans for analysis should be obtained.

Dose distribution along the transverse axis of a new 125I source for interstitial brachytherapy.

A new encapsulated source of 125I has been introduced for interstitial brachytherapy. This source, isoSTAR model 12501 (manufactured by Imagyn Corp.), consists of a welded titanium tube containing 125I as silver iodide uniformly coated on five silver beads. The dose rate constant and the radial dose function for this source were measured using lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimeters in a Solid Water phantom. The value of the dose rate constant is 0.95 cGy h(-1)U(-1) where the unit of air kerma strength is 1 U = 1 cGy h(-1)cm2. The air kerma strength was traceable to the year 2000 primary air kerma strength standard for the model 12501 source at the National Institute of Technology and Standards. The radial dose function for the source was very similar to that for the model 6711 source (manufactured by Nycomed Amersham) for radial distances up to 6 cm. However, the radial dose function is lower in value than that for the model 6702 source (manufactured by Nycomed Amersham) and the model MED3631-A/M Iogold source (manufactured by North American Scientific).

Experimental determination of fluence correction factors at depths beyond dmax for a Farmer type cylindrical ionization chamber in clinical electron beams.

Recently, it has been recommended that electron beam calibrations be performed at a new reference depth [Burns et al., Med. Phys. 23, 383 (1996)] given by dref = 0.6R50-0.1 cm, where R50 is the depth of 50% depth dose. In order to calibrate electron beams at dref with a Farmer type cylindrical ionization chamber, the values of the perturbation correction factors Pwall and Pfl at dref are required. Using a parallel plate Holt chamber as a reference chamber, the product PwallPfl has been determined for a 6.1-mm-diameter PTW cylindrical ionization chamber at dref as a function of R50 of clinical electron beams (6 < or = nominal energy E < or = 22 MeV). Assuming that Pwall for the PTW chamber is unity in electron beams, the measured Pfl values ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 as the energy is increased. These results are in close agreement with recently reported calculated values. Determination of dref requires the knowledge of R50. A relation between I50 and R50 is given in the IAEA Protocol [TRS No. 277 (IAEA, Vienna, 1987), pp. 1-98] for broad beams at SSD = 100 cm. It has been shown experimentally that the equation R50 = 1.029 x I50-0.063 cm, derived by Ding et al. [Med. Phys. 22, 489 (1995)] from Monte Carlo simulations of realistic clinical electron beams, can be used satisfactorily to obtain R50 from I50, where I50 is the depth of 50% ionization. The largest difference between the measured value of R50 and that calculated by using the above equation has been found to be about 1 mm at 22 MeV.

The impact of edema on planning 125I and 103Pd prostate implants.

Permanent transperineal interstitial 125I and 103Pd prostate implants are generally planned to deliver a specific dose to a clinically defined target volume; however, the post-implant evaluation usually reveals that the implant delivered a lower or higher dose than planned. This difference is generally attributed to such factors as source placement errors, overestimation of the prostate volume on CT, and post-implant edema. In the present work we investigate the impact of edema alone. In routine prostate implant planning, it is customary to assume that both the prostate and seeds are static throughout the entire treatment time, and post-implant edema is not taken into consideration in the dosimetry calculation. However, prostate becomes edematous after seed implantation, typically by 50% in volume [Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 41, 1069-1077 (1998)]. The edema resolves itself exponentially with a typical half-life of 10 days. In this work, the impact of the edema-induced dynamic change in prostate volume and seed location on the dose coverage of the prostate is investigated. The total dose delivered to the prostate was calculated by use of a dynamic model, which takes edema into account. In the model, the edema resolves exponentially with time, as reported in a separate study based on serial CT scans [Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. 41, 1069-1077 (1998)]. The model assumes that the seeds were implanted exactly as planned, thus eliminating the effect of source placement errors. Implants based on the same transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images were planned using both 125I and 103Pd sources separately. The preimplant volume and planned seed locations were expanded to different degrees of edema to simulate the postimplant edematous prostate on day 0. The model calculated the dose in increments of 24 h, appropriately adjusting the prostate volume, seed locations, and source strength prior to each time interval and compiled dose-volume histograms (DVH) of the total dose delivered. A total of 30 such DVHs were generated for each implant using different combinations of edema half-life and magnitude. In addition, a DVH of the plan was compiled in the conventional manner, assuming that the prostate volume and seeds were static during treatment. A comparison of the DVH of the static model to the 30 edema corrected DVHs revealed that the plan overestimated the total dose by an amount that increased with the magnitude of the edema and the edema half-life. The maximum overestimation was 15% for 125I and 32% for 103Pd. For more typical edema parameters (a 50% increase in volume and a 10 day half-life) the static plan for 125I overestimated the total dose by about 5%, whereas that for 103Pd overestimated it by about 12%.

Measurement of dose-rate constant for 103Pd seeds with air kerma strength calibration based upon a primary national standard.

Recent developments in the past two years require a significant change in the dosimetry of 103Pd brachytherapy sources (Theraseed model 200, manufactured by Theragenics Corp., Atlanta, GA). Since their introduction in 1987, the air kerma strength of 103Pd sources for interstitial brachytherapy has been determined using a system of apparent activity measurement based upon the measurement of photon fluence at a reference distance along the transverse axis of the source free in air, using a NaI (T1) scintillation detector at the manufacturer's facilities. This detection system has been calibrated against a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable activity standard of a 109Cd source. This system produced a highly consistent standard (within +/-2%) for over 12 years, with the exception of the last 109Cd source change in September 1997, which resulted in a change of 9% from the original 1987 standard. The second major development affecting 103Pd dosimetry is that on 13 January 1999 a primary national standard for the air kerma strength of 103Pd seeds was developed by NIST. This primary standard is based upon an absolute measurement of air kerma rate free in air at a reference distance from the source along its transverse axis using a wide angle free air chamber (WAFAC). In order to implement this new standard for the calibration of source strength in clinical dosimetry for interstitial implants, it is necessary to measure the dose-rate constant for the 103Pd seeds using a calibration of source strength based on the NIST 99 standard. In this work, a measurement of the dose-rate constant using lithium fluoride (LiF) thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) in a water equivalent solid phantom is reported. The measured value of this constant is 0.65 +/- 0.05 cGy h(-1) U(-1), where the unit air kerma strength is 1 U = 1 cGy h(-1) cm2 = 1 microGy h(-1) m2, and is directly traceable to the NIST 99 standard. The implementation of the NIST 99 standard for 103Pd should be accompanied by a simultaneous adoption of the new dose-rate constant reported here. No changes in radial dose function, anisotropy function, anisotropy factor, and geometry function are needed. However, a change in prescribed dose may be necessary to deliver the same physical dose as before.

Dosimetric effects of needle divergence in prostate seed implant using 125I and 103Pd radioactive seeds.

In prostate seed implants, radioactive seeds are implanted into the prostate through a guiding needle with the help of a template and real-time imaging. The ideal locations of the guiding needles and the relative positions of the seeds in each needle are determined before the implantation under the assumption that the needles inserted at different locations will remain parallel. In actual implantation, the direction of the needle is subject variation. In this work, we studied how the dosimetry quality of an implant may be affected when the guiding needles deviate from its planned orientations. Needle divergence of varying degree was simulated on spherical models and actual patient implants. It was found that needle divergence degraded the dosimetric quality of an implant: The minimum target dose, the target dose coverage and therefore the tumor biological effective dose were quantitatively decreased as compared to the reference implant. The magnitude of degradation increased almost linearly with respect to the magnitude of needle divergence. For iodine-125 implants, the average reduction in minimum target dose was about 10% and 20% for needle divergence of standard deviation of 5(0) and 10(0), respectively. The dose coverage in the target was reduced by about 1% and 3% for needle divergence of standard deviation of 5(0) and 10(0), respectively. Implants designed with palladium-103 showed additional 5% reduction in minimum target dose while the effect on dose coverage was about the same as compared to the iodine-125 implants. The degree of dosimetry degradation was shown to be dependent on the size of target volume, the seed spacing used, the use of seeding margin, and on the actual configuration of needle orientations in a given implant. One needs to minimize the physical causes of needle divergence in order to minimize its impact on planned dosimetry. The study suggests that the displacement between a needle image and its planned grid point at the base of prostate should be kept less than 5 mm in order to minimize the reduction in D(min)(<5%) and the increase in cell-survival (< a factor of 10) from the planned dosimetry.

A generalized film technique for the verification of vertex fields used in the treatment of brain tumors.

With the availability of commercial three-dimensional (3D)-treatment planning systems, more and more treatment plans call for the use of noncoplanar conformal beams for the treatment of brain tumors. However, techniques for the verification of many noncoplaner beams, such as vertex fields which involve any combination of gantry, collimator, and table angles, do not exist. The purpose of this work is to report on the results of an algorithm and a technique that have been developed for the verification of noncoplanar vertex fields used in the treatment of brain tumors. This technique is applicable to any geometric orientation of the beam, i.e., a beam orientation that consists of any combination of gantry, table, and collimator rotations. The method consists of superimposing a central plane image of a correctly magnified vertex field on a lateral or oblique field port film. To achieve this, the 3D coordinates of the projection of the isocenter onto the film for lateral (or oblique) as well as the vertex fields are determined and then appropriately matched. Coordinate transformation equations have been developed that enable this matching precisely. A film holder has been designed such that a film cassette can be secured rigidly along the side rails of the treatment table. The technique for taking a patient treatment setup verification film consists of two steps. In the first step, the gantry, table, and collimator angles for the lateral (or oblique) field are set and the usual double exposures are made; the first exposure corresponds to that of the treatment portal with the isocenter clearly identified and the second one a larger radiation field so that the peripheral anatomy is visible on the film. In the next step, the gantry, table, and collimator angles are positioned for the vertex field and the table is moved laterally and vertically and the film longitudinally to a position that will enable precise matching of the isocenter on the film. A third exposure is then taken with the vertex portal. What is seen on the film is a superposition of a central plane image of the vertex field onto the image of the lateral or oblique field. This technique has been used on 60 patients treated with noncoplanar fields for brain tumors. In all of these cases, the coincidence of the projection of the isocenter for the lateral (or oblique) and the vertex fields was found to be within 3 mm.

Combined use of transverse and scout computed tomography scans to localize radioactive seeds in an interstitial brachytherapy implant.

Various techniques have been developed to localize radioactive sources in brachytherapy implants. The most common methods include the orthogonal film method, the stereo-shift film method, and recently, direct localization from a series of contiguous CT transverse images. The major advantage of the CT method is that it provides the seed locations relative to anatomic structures. However, it is often the case that accurate identification and localization of the sources become difficult because of partial source artifacts in more than one transverse cut and other artifacts on CT images. A new algorithm has been developed to combine the advantages of using a pair of orthogonal scout views with the advantages of using a stack of transverse cuts. In the new algorithm, a common reference point is used to correlate CT transverse images and two orthogonal scout CT scans (AP and lateral). The radioactive sources are localized on CT transverse images. At the same time, the sources are displayed automatically on the two CT scout scans. In this way, the individual sources can be clearly distinguished and ambiguities arising from partial source artifacts are resolved immediately. Because of the finite slice thickness of transverse cuts, the longitudinal coordinates are more accurately obtained from the scout views. Therefore, the longitudinal coordinates of seeds localized on the transverse cuts are adjusted so that they match the position of the seeds on scout views. The algorithm has been tested on clinical cases and has proved to be a time saving and accurate method.