Localization of the actin-binding protein fesselin in chicken smooth muscle.

This report compares cellular localization of fesselin in chicken smooth, skeletal and cardiac muscle tissues using affinity purified polyclonal fesselin antibodies. Western blot analyses revealed large amounts of fesselin in gizzard smooth muscle with lower amounts in skeletal and cardiac muscle. In gizzard, fesselin was detected by immunofluorescence as discrete cytoplasmic structures. Fesselin did not co-localize with talin, vinculin or caveolin indicating that fesselin is not associated with dense plaques or caveolar regions of the cell membrane. Immunoelectron microscopy established localization of fesselin within dense bodies. Since dense bodies function as anchorage points for actin and desmin in smooth muscle cells, fesselin may be involved in establishing cytoskeletal structure in this tissue. In skeletal muscle, fesselin was associated with desmin in regularly spaced bands distributed along the length of muscle fibers suggesting localization to the Z-line. Infrequently, this banding pattern was observed in heart tissue as well. Localization at the Z-line of skeletal and cardiac muscle suggests a role in contraction of these tissues.

Localization of calretinin in the rat ovary and in relation to nerve cell bodies in dorsal root and paravertebral ganglia projecting to the ovary.

Retrograde tracing with True Blue was combined with immunocytochemistry to determine the source of any calretinin-immunoreactive (CR-ir) nerves projecting to the rat ovary. In the ovary, a strong signal for calretinin immunoreactivity was localized in interstitial gland cells; however, no intraovarian CR-ir nerves could be demonstrated. When the superior ovarian nerve was isolated, cut, and True Blue applied to the proximal end, the fluorescent dye was retrogradely transported to a population of cells located in T-12, T-13, and L-1 dorsal root and paravertebral ganglia. There was virtually no dual labeling of cells in these ganglia with calretinin (< 0.009% dual labeling in dorsal root and <0.014% in paravertebral ganglia). However, greater than two-thirds of the True Blue-labeled cells were immediately adjacent to CR-ir cells in dorsal root ganglia. This arrangement is suggestive of a paracrine mechanism between CR-ir cells and cells projecting to the ovary. In paravertebral ganglia, 63% of cells projecting to the ovary were surrounded completely or partially by beaded CR-ir nerve fibers. The source of these fibers (sensory or preganglionic sympathetic) is unknown but hypothesized to be preganglionic. Collectively, these observations suggest a participatory role for calretinin in ovarian function, either directly via effects on the interstitial gland or indirectly by influencing neurons projecting to the ovary.

Effects of hypergravity on ovarian-hypophyseal function in antepartum and postpartum rats.

BACKGROUND: Rats exposed to microgravity during the post-implantation phase of pregnancy had minimal alterations in ovarian and hypophyseal parameters during the antepartum and postpartum periods. In the current study, a similar parallel experimental design was employed to ascertain the effects of hypergravity on ovarian and hypophyseal function. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that hypergravity exposure during the post-implantation stage of pregnancy would not alter antepartum and postpartum ovarian and hypophyseal function. METHODS: Pregnant rats were assigned to hypergravity (1.5 G, 1.75 G, or 2.0 G), rotational control, or stationary control groups (n = 10 each group) beginning on gestation day 11 and ending on day 20. Hypophyseal and ovarian analyses were conducted on 5 of the animals from each group at day 20. The remaining animals in each group were allowed to go to term and the same analyses were conducted 3 h postpartum. RESULTS: Hypergravity at all levels decreased the percent body mass gain from gestation day 11 to 20 (p < 0.05); however, the wet weight of the pituitaries and ovaries was not changed. There was no effect of hypergravity on the number of healthy or atretic antral follicles of any size at gestation day 20 or postpartum. The number of corpora lutea of pregnancy was decreased in all hypergravity groups, but the number of live fetuses at gestation day 20 or pups at term was not altered. Plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), prolactin, and progesterone were not changed at gestation day 20 or postpartum. Pituitary content of LH, FSH, and prolactin was not altered by hypergravity at gestation day 20, but LH content was significantly increased (p < 0.05) at 1.5 and 1.75 G postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that hypergravity, up to and including 2.0 G, is compatible with maintenance of pregnancy and has minimal effects on hypophyseal parameters. Ovarian follicles are not altered by hypergravity, but corpora lutea may regress at a more rapid rate.