Diagnostic value of FeNO and MMEF for predicting cough variant asthma in chronic cough patients with or without allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) for differentiating cough variant asthma (CVA) from chronic cough in patients with or without allergic rhinitis. METHODS: In total, 328 patients with chronic cough who underwent spirometry and FeNO testing were consecutively included in the retrospective analysis. Patients were divided into the CVA (n = 125) or NCVA (n = 203) groups according to the diagnostic criteria of CVA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were established to assess the diagnostic efficiency and optimal cutoff points of FeNO and MMEF for the prediction of CVA. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff values of FeNO and MMEF to discriminate CVA from chronic cough were 24.5 ppb (AUC, 0.765; sensitivity, 69.60%; specificity 72.91%; PPV, 61.27%; NPV, 79.57%) and 66.2% (AUC, 0.771; sensitivity, 67.20%; specificity 78.33%; PPV, 65.63%; NPV, 79.50%). The optimal cutoff values of combining FeNO with MMEF to discriminate CVA from chronic cough were >22 ppb for FeNO and <62.6% for MMEF (AUC, 0.877). In patients with and without allergic rhinitis, the optimal cutoff point of FeNO to discriminate CVA from chronic cough was 24.5 ppb (AUC, 0.820) and 33.5 ppb (AUC, 0.707), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FeNO and MMEF might have greater value as negative parameters for differentiating CVA from chronic cough. Combining FeNO and MMEF provided a significantly better prediction than either alone. The diagnostic accuracy of FeNO for predicting CVA in chronic cough patients with allergic rhinitis was higher than in chronic cough patients without allergic rhinitis.

Clinical implications of concentration of alveolar nitric oxide in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough.

Asthma is an important cause of subacute cough. The concentration of alveolar nitric oxide (CANO) is a sensitive inflammatory indicator in peripheral airways, and it has received much less attention than the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO50). The main objective of this study was to explore the correlation between CANO and clinical parameters in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough, which might promote understanding of the clinical utility of CANO in these special patient populations. 155 patients with subacute cough were included consecutively, of which 25 were diagnosed as asthmatic. Data for demographic characteristics, FeNO50, CANO, baseline spirometry, bronchial provocation test (or bronchodilation test) and response dose ratio (RDR) were collected. Differences between the asthmatic and non-asthmatic groups were analyzed. Spearman's correlation coefficient (ρ) was used to evaluate the correlation between FeNO50, CANO and other clinical parameters. In patients with subacute cough, baseline CANO values did not differ between asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients (4.4(1.3, 11.4) versus 4.0(2.1, 6.8) ppb,P> 0.05). Besides, CANO exhibited a stronger association with pulmonary function parameters when compared with FeNO50. For asthmatic subacute cough, CANO was inversely correlated with FEV1/FVC (ρ= -0.69,P< 0.01) and small airway parameters including MEF25 (ρ= -0.47,P< 0.05) and MMEF (ρ= -0.45,P< 0.05). For non-asthmatic subacute cough, CANO was inversely correlated with MEF25 (ρ= -0.19,P< 0.05) and RDR (ρ= -0.21,P< 0.05). In subacute cough, asthmatic and non-asthmatic patients had similar values of baseline CANO. In both asthmatic and non-asthmatic subacute cough, CANO exhibited a stronger association with pulmonary function parameters when compared with FeNO50. A low CANO value in non-asthmatic subacute cough corresponded to a higher value of RDR, which implied a stronger tendency towards airway responsiveness.

The relationship between steps of 6MWT and COPD severity: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The distance of 6-minute walk test (D6MWT) has been widely used in the assessment of functional status in patients with COPD, while very little attention has been paid to the role of steps of 6-minute walk test (S6MWT). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between S6MWT and other physiologic parameters of COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with stable COPD were enrolled consecutively in this cross-sectional study. Pulmonary function tests, including spirometry, impulse oscillometry (IOS) and the single-breath diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO), were carried out at rest. Quality of life was assessed by health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires, including modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) and Clinical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Questionnaire. Both steps and distance were measured in the following 6-minute walk test (6MWT). RESULTS: Both S6MWT and D6MWT showed significant correlation with spirometry, IOS, DLCO parameters and HRQoL questionnaires score. Both pre- and post-6MWT inspiratory capacity showed significant correlation with S6MWT (ρ=0.338, P=0.004; ρ=0.359, P=0.002, respectively), whereas did not correlate with D6MWT (ρ=0.145, P=0.230; ρ=0.160, P=0.189, respectively). In stepwise multiple regression analysis, mMRC grade, age and CAT score remained as significant predictors in the final model for D6MWT (adjusted R 2=0.445, P<0.01). DLCO and CAT score remained as significant predictors in the final model for S6MWT (adjusted R 2=0.417, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: S6MWT is efficient in the evaluation of functional status and quality of life in COPD and has significant correlation with various parameters indicating disease severity. Additionally, S6MWT might be better in predicting lung hyperinflation in COPD compared with D6MWT.