Association of pre-existing depression and anxiety with Omicron variant infection.

Pre-existing psychiatric disorders were linked to an increased susceptibility to COVID-19 during the initial outbreak of the pandemic, while evidence during Omicron prevalence is lacking. Leveraging data from two prospective cohorts in China, we identified incident Omicron infections between January 2023 and April 2023. Participants with a self-reported history or self-rated symptoms of depression or anxiety before the Omicron pandemic were considered the exposed group, whereas the others were considered unexposed. We employed multivariate logistic regression models to examine the association of pre-existing depression or anxiety with the risk of any or severe Omicron infection indexed by medical interventions or severe symptoms. Further, we stratified the analyses by polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for COVID-19 and repeated the analyses using the UK Biobank data. We included 10,802 individuals from the Chinese cohorts (mean age = 51.1 years, 45.6% male), among whom 7841 (72.6%) were identified as cases of Omicron infection. No association was found between any pre-existing depression or anxiety and the overall risk of Omicron infection (odds ratio [OR] =1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-1.14). However, positive associations were noted for severe Omicron infection, either as infections requiring medical interventions (1.26, 1.02-1.54) or with severe symptoms (≥3: 1.73, 1.51-1.97). We obtained comparable estimates when stratified by COVID-19 PRS level. Additionally, using clustering method, we identified eight distinct symptom patterns and found associations between pre-existing depression or anxiety and the patterns characterized by multiple or complex severe symptoms including cough and taste and smell decline (ORs = 1.42-2.35). The results of the UK Biobank analyses corroborated findings of the Chinese cohorts. In conclusion, pre-existing depression and anxiety was not associated with the risk of Omicron infection overall but an elevated risk of severe Omicron infection, supporting the continued efforts on monitoring and possible early intervention in this high-risk population during Omicron prevalence.

Cohort profile: the China surgery and anesthesia cohort (CSAC).

The China Surgery and Anaesthesia Cohort (CSAC) study was launched in July 2020 and is an ongoing prospective cohort study recruiting patients aged 40-65 years who underwent elective surgeries with general anaesthesia across four medical centres in China. The general objective of the CSAC study is to improve our understanding of the complex interaction between environmental and genetic components as well as to determine their effects on a wide range of interested surgery/anaesthesia-related outcomes. To achieve this goal, we collected enriched phenotypic data, e.g., sociodemographic characteristics, lifestyle factors, perioperative neuropsychological changes, anaesthesia- and surgery-related complications, and medical conditions, at recruitment, as well as through both active (at 1, 3, 7 days and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after surgery) and passive (for more than 1 year after surgery) follow-up assessments. We also obtained omics data from blood samples. In addition, COVID-19-related information was collected from all participants since January 2023, immediately after COVID-19 restrictions were eased in China. As of July 18, 2023, 12,766 participants (mean age = 52.40 years, 57.93% were female) completed baseline data collection (response rate = 94.68%), among which approximately 70% donated blood and hair samples. The follow-up rates within 12 months after surgery were > 92%. Our initial analyses have demonstrated the incidence of and risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) among middle-aged Chinese individuals, which may prompt further mechanistic exploration and facilitate the development of effective interventions for preventing those conditions. Additional studies, such as genome-wide association analyses for identifying the genetic determinants of CPSP and POCD, are ongoing, and their findings will be released in the future.

Preoperative psychological symptoms and chronic postsurgical pain: analysis of the prospective China Surgery and Anaesthesia Cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Both preoperative psychological symptoms and chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) are prevalent conditions and major concerns among surgery patients, with inconclusive associations. METHODS: Based on the China Surgery and Anaesthesia Cohort (CSAC), we recruited 8350 surgery patients (40-65 yr old) from two medical centres between July 2020 and March 2023. Patients with preoperative psychological symptoms (i.e. anxiety, depression, stress reaction, and poor sleep quality) were identified using corresponding well-established scales. We then examined the associations of individual preoperative psychological symptoms and major patterns of preoperative psychological symptoms (identified by k-means clustering analysis) with CPSP, and different pain trajectories within 3 months. Lastly, mediation analyses were conducted to elucidate the mediating role of surgery/anaesthesia-related factors and the presence of 1-month postoperative psychological symptoms on the studied associations. RESULTS: We included 1302 (1302/8350, 15.6%) CPSP patients. When analysed separately, all studied preoperative psychological symptoms were associated with increased CPSP risk, with the most pronounced odds ratio noted for anxiety (1.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-1.86). Compared with patients clustered in the minor symptom group, excess risk of CPSP and experiencing an increasing pain trajectory was increased among patients with preoperative psychological symptoms featured by sleep disturbances (odds ratio=1.46, 95% CI 1.25-1.70 for CPSP and 1.58, 95% CI 1.20-2.08 for increasing pain trajectory) and multiple psychological symptoms (1.84 [95% CI 1.48-2.28] and 4.34 [95% CI 3.20-5.88]). Mediation analyses revealed acute/subacute postsurgical pain and psychological symptoms existing 1 month after surgery as notable mediators of the observed associations. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of preoperative psychological symptoms might individually or jointly increase the risk of chronic postsurgical pain or experiencing deterioration in pain trajectory. Interventions for managing acute/subacute postsurgical pain and psychological symptoms at 1 month after surgery might help reduce such risk. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR2000034039.

Combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in gastric cancer patients: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We conducted this double-blinded randomized controlled trial to examine whether the combination of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block could improve analgesia efficacy and duration for gastric cancer patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: The preoperative area, operating room, postanesthesia recovery room and bed ward. PATIENTS: A total of 312 adult patients (104 per group) with gastric cancer were included. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received bilateral subcostal TAP block with three different anesthetics (60 ml 0.25% ropivacaine added with 10 mg dexamethasone and 1 µg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [A] or 10 mg dexamethasone [B] or 1 µg·kg-1 dexmedetomidine [C]). MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain 24 h on movement. Secondary outcomes included incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, pain score, opioids use, recovery quality and adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain on movement 24 h postoperatively of group A was significantly lower than group B (45.19% vs 63.46%; RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.92) and group C (45.19% vs 73.08%, RR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.79). The median moving pain scores decreased significantly at 24 h (3.00 [3.00,5.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,6.00] vs 4.00 [3.00,5.00]; P < 0.001). There were significant differences in the opioids consumption within the first 24 h (27.5 [17.0,37.2] vs 30.0 [20.0,42.0] vs 32.0 [25.0,44.0] mg; P = 0.01) and the duration to first rescue analgesia (65.5 ± 26.7 vs 45.9 ± 34.5 vs 49.2 ± 27.2 h; P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The combination with dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants for TAP block reduced the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain and pain score both on movement and at rest at 24 h with prolonged duration to first rescue analgesia after gastric cancer surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2000037981.

[Progress on the researches of acupuncture preconditioning before surgery].

This paper reviews the researches on acupuncture preconditioning before surgery in recent years and explores its application value from three aspects, i.e. relieving preoperative anxiety, preventing from postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and preventing from postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction. As a relatively safe non-drug treatment, acupuncture has the underlying advantages in participating into multidisciplinary coordination in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). By building up higher-quality medical evidences and revealing the effect mechanism of acupuncture from multi-dimenisonal aspects, it is expected that acupuncture technology can be coordinated with ERAS to optimize the clinical path in the perioperative period, and boost the development of the perioperative medicine ultimately.

Postsurgery Subjective Cognitive and Short-Term Memory Impairment Among Middle-Aged Chinese Patients.

Importance: Perioperative neurocognitive disorder, particularly postoperative cognitive impairment, is common and associated with multiple medical and social adversities, although data from China are lacking. Objective: To examine the incidence, trajectory, and risk factors for subjective cognitive and short-term memory impairment after surgery in the Chinese population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from the China Surgery and Anesthesia Cohort to assess surgical patients aged 40 to 65 years from 2 medical centers between July 15, 2020, and March 31, 2023, with active follow-up within 1 year after the surgery. Of 11 158 patients who were successfully recruited (response rate, 94.4%), 10 149 participants were eligible and available for analysis. From this population, separate cohorts were constructed for analyzing subjective cognitive impairment (8105 noncardiac and 678 cardiac surgery patients) and short-term memory impairment (5246 noncardiac and 454 cardiac surgery patients). Exposures: Twenty-four potential risk factors regarding comorbidities, preoperative psychological conditions, anesthesia- or surgery-related factors, and postsurgical events were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included subjective cognitive function measured by the 8-Item Informant Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia (AD8; scores range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe cognitive impairment) and short-term memory measured by the 3-Word Recall Test (TRT; scores range from 0 to 3, with lower scores indicating more severe short-term memory impairment) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after noncardiac and cardiac surgery. Generalized linear mixed models were used to identify risk factors associated with the presence of AD8 (score ≥2) or TRT (score <3) abnormality as well as the aggressively deteriorative trajectories of those cognitive measurements. Results: For noncardiac surgery patients, the AD8 analysis included 8105 patients (mean [SD] age, 52.3 [7.1] years; 3378 [41.7%] male), and the TRT analysis included 5246 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.4 [7.0] years; 1969 [37.5%] male). The AD8 abnormality incidence rates after noncardiac surgery increased from 2.2% (175 of 8105) at 7 days to 17.1% (1059 of 6191) at 6 months after surgery, before appearing to decrease. In contrast, the TRT abnormality incidence rates followed a U-shaped pattern, with the most pronounced incidence rates seen at 7 days (38.9% [2040 of 5246]) and 12 months (49.0% [1394 of 2845]). Similar patterns were seen among cardiac surgery patients for the AD8 analysis (678 patients; mean [SD] age, 53.2 [6.3] years; 393 [58.0%] male) and TRT analysis (454 patients; mean [SD] age, 52.4 [6.4] years; 248 [54.6%] male). Among noncardiac surgery patients, the top risk factors for aggressively deteriorative AD8 trajectory and for AD8 abnormality, respectively, after surgery were preoperative sleep disturbances (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index ≥16 vs 0-5: odds ratios [ORs], 4.04 [95% CI, 2.20-7.40] and 4.54 [95% CI, 2.40-8.59]), intensive care unit stay of 2 days or longer (ORs, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.26-4.67] and 3.07 [95% CI, 1.67-5.65]), and preoperative depressive symptoms (ORs, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.38-2.24] and 2.23 [95% CI, 1.79-2.77]). Analyses for TRT abnormality and trajectory, as well as the analyses conducted among cardiac surgery patients, found fewer associated factors. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study of middle-aged Chinese surgery patients found subjective cognitive and short-term memory impairment within 12 months after both cardiac and noncardiac surgery, with multiple identified risk factors, underscoring the potential of preoperative psychological interventions and optimized perioperative management for postoperative cognitive impairment prevention.

Opioid Dose, Pain, and Recovery following Abdominal Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: The optimal dosage for opioids given to patients after surgery for pain management remains controversial. We examined the association of higher post-surgical opioid use with pain relief and recovery. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled adult patients who underwent elective abdominal surgery at our hospital between August 2021 and April 2022. Patients were divided into the "high-intensity" or "low-intensity" groups based on their post-surgical opioid use. Generalized estimating equation models were used to assess the associations between pain scores at rest and during movement on days 1, 2, 3, and 5 after surgery as primary outcomes. The self-reported recovery and incidence of adverse events were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Results: Among the 1170 patients in the final analysis, 293 were in the high-intensity group. Patients in the high-intensity group received nearly double the amount of oral morphine equivalents per day compared to those in the low-intensity group (84.52 vs. 43.80), with a mean difference of 40.72 (95% confidence interval (CI0 38.96−42.48, p < 0.001) oral morphine equivalents per day. At all timepoints, the high-intensity group reported significantly higher pain scores at rest (difference in means 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.58; p < 0.001) and during movement (difference in means 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.71; p < 0.001) as well as significantly lower recovery scores (mean difference (MD) −8.65; 95% CI, −10.55 to −6.67; p < 0.001). A post hoc analysis found that patients with moderate to severe pain during movement were more likely to receive postoperative high-intensity opioid use. Furthermore, patients in the non-high-intensity group got out of bed sooner (MD 4.31 h; p = 0.001), required urine catheters for shorter periods of time (MD 12.26 h; p < 0.001), and were hospitalized for shorter periods (MD 1.17 days; p < 0.001). The high-intensity group was at a higher risk of chronic postsurgical pain (odds ratio 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.08, p = 0.005). Conclusions: High-intensity opioid use after elective abdominal surgery may not be sufficient for improving pain management or the quality of recovery compared to non-high-intensity use. Our results strengthen the argument for a multimodal approach that does not rely so heavily on opioids.