Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Anesth Analg ; 136(4): 646-654, 2023 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36928149

RESUMO

Functional capacity assessment is important for perioperative risk stratification; however, there are currently limited options for objective and economical functional capacity evaluation. Pedometer functions are now widely available in mobile devices and offer a nonintrusive and objective approach to measuring patient activity level over time. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review to assess the value of pedometer readings in predicting perioperative outcomes. We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE (Ovid), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Web of Science Citation Index for studies, which assessed the correlation between perioperative (30 days before to 30 days after surgery) pedometer data and perioperative outcomes. We identified a total of 18 studies for inclusion. Seven of the studies recorded preoperative pedometer data, and 13 studies recorded postoperative pedometer data. Notably, 10 of the studies covered oncologic surgery patients. The included studies consistently reported that preoperative pedometer readings correlated with postoperative complication rates. In addition, in-hospital postoperative pedometer readings correlated with postdischarge complications and readmissions. Perioperative pedometer data demonstrated consistent and biologically plausible association with perioperative outcomes. Further studies are needed to validate the use of pedometer in the perioperative period and to identify the optimal approach for its use to potentially improve patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Actigrafia , Dispositivos Eletrônicos Vestíveis , Humanos , Assistência ao Convalescente , Alta do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias
2.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 20(5): 549-559, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33656971

RESUMO

IntroductionPostoperative pain is one of the most common adverse events after surgery and has been shown to increase the risk of other complications. On the other hand, liberal opioid use in the perioperative period is also associated with risk of adverse events. The current consensus is therefore to provide multimodal, opioid minimizing analgesia after surgery.Areas CoveredIn this review, we will discuss the benefits and risks associated with non-opioid analgesics, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, gabapentinoids, ketamine, α-2 agonists, and corticosteroids. In addition, we will discuss the general and block-specific risks associated with regional anesthestic techniques.Expert OpinionAdverse events associated with non-opioid analgesics are rare outside their specific contraindicated patient groups, especially when dosed appropriately. α-2 agonists can cause transient hypotension and bradycardia, and gabapentinoids may cause sedation in higher risk patient populations. Regional anesthesia techniques are generally safe when done by an experienced practitioner. We therefore encourage the development of standardized multimodal analgesic protocols, which may facilitate opioid minimization and lead to better patient outcomes.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Analgésicos/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Anestesia por Condução/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA