N6-methyladenosine-modified circPLPP4 sustains cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells via PIK3R1 upregulation.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin (CDDP) is the first-line chemotherapeutic strategy to treat patients with ovarian cancer (OC). The development of CDDP resistance remains an unsurmountable obstacle in OC treatment and frequently induces tumor recurrence. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are noncoding RNAs with important functions in cancer progression. Whether circRNAs function in CDDP resistance of OC is unclear. METHODS: Platinum-resistant circRNAs were screened via circRNA deep sequencing and examined using in situ hybridization (ISH) in OC. The role of circPLPP4 in CDDP resistance was assessed by clone formation and Annexin V assays in vitro, and by OC patient-derived xenografts and intraperitoneal tumor models in vivo. The mechanism underlying circPLPP4-mediated activation of miR-136/PIK3R1 signaling was examined by luciferase reporter assay, RNA pull-down, RIP, MeRIP and ISH. RESULTS: circPLPP4 was remarkably upregulated in platinum resistant OC. circPLPP4 overexpression significantly enhanced, whereas circPLPP4 silencing reduced, OC cell chemoresistance. Mechanistically, circPLPP4 acts as a microRNA sponge to sequester miR-136, thus competitively upregulating PIK3R1 expression and conferring CDDP resistance. The increased circPLPP4 level in CDDP-resistant cells was caused by increased RNA stability, mediated by increased N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification of circPLPP4. In vivo delivery of an antisense oligonucleotide targeting circPLPP4 significantly enhanced CDDP efficacy in a tumor model. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals a plausible mechanism by which the m6A -induced circPLPP4/ miR-136/ PIK3R1 axis mediated CDDP resistance in OC, suggesting that circPLPP4 may serve as a promising therapeutic target against CDDP resistant OC. A circPLPP4-targeted drug in combination with CDDP might represent a rational regimen in OC.

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with semaglutide, cilofexor and firsocostat in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomised, open-label phase II trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with increased risk of liver-related and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Given the complex pathophysiology of NASH, combining therapies with complementary mechanisms may be beneficial. This trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, alone and in combination with the farnesoid X receptor agonist cilofexor and/or the acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase inhibitor firsocostat in patients with NASH. METHODS: This was a phase II, open-label, proof-of-concept trial in which patients with NASH (F2-F3 on biopsy, or MRI-proton density fat fraction [MRI-PDFF] ≥10% and liver stiffness by transient elastography ≥7 kPa) were randomised to 24 weeks' treatment with semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly as monotherapy or combined with once-daily cilofexor (30 or 100 mg) and/or once-daily firsocostat 20 mg. The primary endpoint was safety. All efficacy endpoints were exploratory. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were randomised to semaglutide (n = 21), semaglutide plus cilofexor 30 mg (n = 22), semaglutide plus cilofexor 100 mg (n = 22), semaglutide plus firsocostat (n = 22) or semaglutide, cilofexor 30 mg and firsocostat (n = 21). Treatments were well tolerated - the incidence of adverse events was similar across groups (73-90%) and most events were gastrointestinal in nature. Despite similar weight loss (7-10%), compared with semaglutide monotherapy, combinations resulted in greater improvements in liver steatosis measured by MRI-PDFF (least-squares mean of absolute changes: -9.8 to -11.0% vs. -8.0%), liver biochemistry, and non-invasive tests of fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild-to-moderate fibrosis due to NASH, semaglutide with firsocostat and/or cilofexor was generally well tolerated. In exploratory efficacy analyses, treatment resulted in additional improvements in liver steatosis and biochemistry vs. semaglutide alone. Given this was a small-scale open-label trial, double-blind placebo-controlled trials with adequate patient numbers are warranted to assess the efficacy and safety of these combinations in NASH. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03987074. LAY SUMMARY: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its more severe form, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are serious liver conditions that worsen over time if untreated. The reasons people develop NASH are complex and combining therapies that target different aspects of the disease may be more helpful than using single treatments. This trial showed that the use of 3 different types of drugs, namely semaglutide, cilofexor and firsocostat, in combination was safe and may offer additional benefits over treatment with semaglutide alone.

Analysis of patients without and with an initial triple-negative breast cancer diagnosis in the phase 3 randomized ASCENT study of sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti-Trop-2 antibody coupled to SN-38 via a proprietary hydrolyzable linker. In the ASCENT study, SG improved survival versus single-agent treatment of physician's choice (TPC) in pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). Hormone/HER2 receptor changes are common, particularly at relapse/metastasis. This subanalysis assessed outcomes in patients who did/did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis, before enrollment. METHODS: TNBC diagnosis was only required at study entry. Patients with mTNBC refractory/relapsing after ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to receive SG or TPC. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients without brain metastases. RESULTS: Overall, 70/235 (30%) and 76/233 (33%) patients who received SG and TPC, respectively, did not have TNBC at initial diagnosis. Clinical benefit with SG versus TPC was observed in this subset. Median PFS was 4.6 versus 2.3 months (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.32-0.72), median overall survival was 12.4 versus 6.7 months (HR 0.44; 95% CI 0.30-0.64), and objective response rate (ORR) was 31% versus 4%; those who also received prior CDK4/6 inhibitors had ORRs of 21% versus 5%. Efficacy and safety for patients with TNBC at initial diagnosis were generally similar to those who did not present with TNBC at initial diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Patients without TNBC at initial diagnosis had improved clinical outcomes and a manageable safety profile with SG, supporting SG as a treatment option for mTNBC regardless of subtype at initial diagnosis. Subtype reassessment in advanced breast cancer allows for optimal treatment. Clinical trial registration number NCT02574455, registered October 12, 2015.

Fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional erbium-doped glass 1,565-nm device treatment of human facial photoaging: a prospective, split-face, random clinical trial.

Microneedle fractional radiofrequency (MFR) and non-ablative 1565 nm fractional laser (NAFL) have recently been introduced as new techniques to address the growing concern of facial photoaging. In this prospective randomized split-face study, we wanted to compare the safety and efficacy of MFR with that of NAFL for the treatment of facial photoaging in Asian patients. Fifteen healthy Chinese patients were enrolled for this randomized split-face study. Each patient underwent three sessions of treatment with MFR and NAFL on opposite sides of their face, one month apart. A blinded outcome assessment of the photoaging severity was performed by two independent plastic surgeons on a 5-point visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-4). Patient satisfaction was also scored based on a 5-point VAS (0 = dissatisfaction, 4 = extremely satisfied). Sagging of the nasolabial groove was evaluated using the Antera 3D camera, facial wrinkles and pores using the VISIA skin analysis system. Any adverse events that occurred during the study were also evaluated. Based on the VAS scores and results from the Antera 3D and VISIA, it was noted that there was a significant improvement in facial skin laxity, wrinkles, and pores, and lesser sagging of the nasolabial groove on both the MFR and NAFL sides of the face, compared with that of the baseline. Most patients were satisfied with the treatment and reported tolerable pain and crusting. Although no significant differences were observed between the MFR and NAFL treatments, the NAFL treatment resulted in a shorter downtime(4.56 ± 2.72d) than the MFR treatment(6.96 ± 3.27d). This study confirms the efficacy of MFR and NAFL treatments for facial skin rejuvenation in Asian patients. Furthermore, the therapies were found to be safe and well-tolerated. Our findings suggest that NAFL may be a more convenient treatment modality for facial photoaging because of its shorter downtime. However, sagging of the nasolabial groove was more improved by the MFR treatment than by the NAFL treatment.

Selonsertib for patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis due to NASH: Results from randomized phase III STELLAR trials.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) plays a key role in hepatocyte injury, inflammation, and fibrosis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We evaluated the safety and antifibrotic effect of selonsertib, a selective inhibitor of ASK1, in patients with advanced fibrosis due to NASH. METHODS: We conducted 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trials of selonsertib in patients with NASH and bridging fibrosis (F3, STELLAR-3) or compensated cirrhosis (F4, STELLAR-4). Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to receive selonsertib 18 mg, selonsertib 6 mg, or placebo once daily for 48 weeks. Liver biopsies were performed at screening and week 48 and non-invasive tests of fibrosis (NITs) were evaluated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥1-stage improvement in fibrosis without worsening of NASH at week 48. Additional endpoints included changes in NITs, progression to cirrhosis (in STELLAR-3), and liver-related clinical events. RESULTS: Neither trial met the primary efficacy endpoint. In STELLAR-3, fibrosis improvement without worsening of NASH was observed in 10% (31/322, p = 0.49 vs. placebo), 12% (39/321, p = 0.93 vs. placebo), and 13% (21/159) of patients in the selonsertib 18 mg, selonsertib 6 mg, and placebo groups, respectively. In STELLAR-4, the primary endpoint was achieved in 14% (51/354; p = 0.56), 13% (45/351; p = 0.93), and 13% (22/172) of patients, respectively. Although selonsertib led to dose-dependent reductions in hepatic phospho-p38 expression indicative of pharmacodynamic activity, it had no significant effect on liver biochemistry, NITs, progression to cirrhosis, or adjudicated clinical events. The rates and types of adverse events were similar among selonsertib and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-eight weeks of selonsertib monotherapy had no antifibrotic effect in patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis due to NASH. LAY SUMMARY: Patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can develop scarring of the liver (fibrosis), including cirrhosis, which increases the risks of liver failure and liver cancer. We tested whether 48 weeks of treatment with selonsertib reduced fibrosis in patients with NASH and advanced liver scarring. We did not find that selonsertib reduced fibrosis in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: Clinicaltrials.gov numbers NCT03053050 and NCT03053063.

The involvement of the mGluR5-mediated JNK signaling pathway in rats with diabetic retinopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the involvement of the mGluR5-mediated JNK signaling pathway in rats with diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: This study established rat models of diabetes mellitus (DM), which were divided into Normal, DM, DM + CHPG (mGluR5 agonist CHPG), and DM + MTEP (mGluR5 antagonist MTEP) groups. The blood glucose and weight of rats were recorded. EB staining was used for observation of blood-retinal barrier (BRB) damage. Neural retina function was measured by pattern electroretinogram (ERG). PAS and NG2 immunohistochemistry were conducted to evaluate the retinal vascular morphology. The TUNEL assay and active caspase-3 immunohistochemistry were performed to detect retinal cell apoptosis. Additionally, the expression levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) were measured. Moreover, expression levels of mGluR5 and JNK pathway-related proteins were detected by western blot. RESULTS: When compared with control rats, rats in the DM group showed decreased amplitude and latency of the peak times in the ERG test; further, DM group rats presented increases in blood glucose, BRB permeability, a retinal capillary area density, retinal cell apoptosis with an increased number of active caspase-3-positive cells, MDA level, mGluR5 levels, and the ratio of p-JNK/JNK, and they showed reductions in body weight and SOD activity, as well as in the number of pericytes and in the pericyte coverage (all P < 0.05). However, rats in DM + CHPG group had stronger negative effects than those in DM group (all P < 0.05). Rats from DM + MTEP group showed an opposite trend compared with the DM rats (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The level of mGluR5 in DR rats was upregulated, whereas inhibition of mGluR5 alleviated retinal pathological damage and decreased cell apoptosis to improve DR via suppression of the JNK signaling pathway, which provided a scientific theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of DR.

Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir for HCV Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 Infection.

BACKGROUND: A simple treatment regimen that is effective in a broad range of patients who are chronically infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) remains an unmet medical need. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving untreated and previously treated patients with chronic HCV genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6 infection, including those with compensated cirrhosis. Patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, 4, or 6 were randomly assigned in a 5:1 ratio to receive the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir in a once-daily, fixed-dose combination tablet or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Because of the low prevalence of genotype 5 in the study regions, patients with genotype 5 did not undergo randomization but were assigned to the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir group. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Of the 624 patients who received treatment with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, 34% had HCV genotype 1a, 19% genotype 1b, 17% genotype 2, 19% genotype 4, 6% genotype 5, and 7% genotype 6. A total of 8% of patients were black, 19% had cirrhosis, and 32% had been previously treated for HCV. The rate of sustained virologic response among patients receiving sofosbuvir-velpatasvir was 99% (95% confidence interval, 98 to >99). Two patients receiving sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, both with HCV genotype 1, had a virologic relapse. None of the 116 patients receiving placebo had a sustained virologic response. Serious adverse events were reported in 15 patients (2%) in the sofosbuvir-velpatasvir group and none in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response among both previously treated and untreated patients infected with HCV genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6, including those with compensated cirrhosis. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02201940.).

Efficacy of 8 Weeks of Sofosbuvir, Velpatasvir, and Voxilaprevir in Patients With Chronic HCV Infection: 2 Phase 3 Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) after 12 weeks of treatment with the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir combined with the NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir. We assessed the efficacy of 8 weeks of treatment with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir plus the pangenotypic NS3/4A protease inhibitor voxilaprevir (sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir). METHODS: In 2 phase 3, open-label trials, patients with HCV infection who had not been treated previously with a direct-acting antiviral agent were assigned randomly to groups given sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 8 weeks or sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks. POLARIS-2, which enrolled patients infected with all HCV genotypes with or without cirrhosis, except patients with genotype 3 and cirrhosis, was designed to test the noninferiority of 8 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir to 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir using a noninferiority margin of 5%. POLARIS-3, which enrolled patients infected with HCV genotype 3 who had cirrhosis, compared rates of SVR in both groups with a performance goal of 83%. RESULTS: In POLARIS-2, 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93%-97%) of patients had an SVR to 8 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir; this did not meet the criterion to establish noninferiority to 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, which produced an SVR in 98% of patients (95% CI, 96%-99%; difference in the stratum-adjusted Mantel-Haenszel proportions of -3.2%; 95% CI, -6.0% to -0.4%). The difference in the efficacy was owing primarily to a lower rate of SVR (92%) among patients with HCV genotype 1a infection receiving 8 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir. In POLARIS-3, 96% of patients (95% CI, 91%-99%) achieved an SVR in both treatment groups, which was significantly superior to the performance goal. Overall, the most common adverse events were headache, fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea; diarrhea and nausea were reported more frequently by patients receiving voxilaprevir. In both trials, the proportion of patients who discontinued treatment because of adverse events was low (range, 0%-1%). CONCLUSIONS: In phase 3 trials of patients with HCV infection, we did not establish that sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 8 weeks was noninferior to sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for 12 weeks, but the 2 regimens had similar rates of SVR in patients with HCV genotype 3 and cirrhosis. Mild gastrointestinal adverse events were associated with treatment regimens that included voxilaprevir. ClinicalTrials.gov numbers: POLARIS-2, NCT02607800; and POLARIS-3, NCT02639338.

The safety and effectiveness of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in adolescents 12-17 years old with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection.

No all-oral, direct-acting antiviral regimens have been approved for children with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in adolescents with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. One hundred patients aged 12-17 years received a combination tablet of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir once daily for 12 weeks. On the tenth day following initiation of dosing, 10 patients underwent an intensive pharmacokinetic evaluation of the concentrations of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and the sofosbuvir metabolite GS-331007. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment. Median age of patients was 15 years (range 12-17). A majority (80%) were HCV treatment-naive, and 84% were infected through perinatal transmission. One patient had cirrhosis, and 42 did not; in 57 patients the degree of fibrosis was unknown. Overall, 98% (98/100; 95% confidence interval 93%-100%) of patients reached sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. No patient had virologic failure. The 2 patients who did not achieve sustained virologic response at 12 weeks were lost to follow-up either during or after treatment. The three most commonly reported adverse events were headache (27% of patients), diarrhea (14%), and fatigue (13%). No serious adverse events were reported. Area under the concentration-time curve (tau) and maximum concentration values for sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-331007 were within the predefined pharmacokinetic equivalence boundaries of 50%-200% when compared with adults from phase 2 and 3 studies of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. CONCLUSION: Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was highly effective at treating adolescents with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection; the dose of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir currently used in adults was well tolerated in adolescents and had an appropriate pharmacokinetic profile. (Hepatology 2017;66:371-378).

Demographic profile and ocular characteristics of stage 5 retinopathy of prematurity at a referral center in Northwest China: implications for implementation.

BACKGROUND: Severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with extremely unfavorable prognosis among infants can do great damage to individuals and bring tremendous social-economic burden. The purpose of this study is to describe the demographic and ocular characteristics of infants who presented with stage 5 ROP in order to identify reasons why they have become blind, and to identify contributing factors in order to focus great attention on the current ROP program and to inspire more effort in ROP screening in middle income countries. METHODS: A retrospective review of consecutive infants with stage 5 ROP from December 2010 to December 2016 in Department of Ophthalmology, Xijing Hospital. Various parameters retrieved included birthweight, gestational age, age at initial examination, postmenstrual age, screening details, check-up details and reasons for consultation. Ocular findings were recorded and also detected by ultrasonography. RESULTS: A retrospective review of 20 consecutive infants with stage 5 ROP are included. Mean birthweight was1712.3 ± 512.97 g and mean gestational age at birth was 32.1 ± 2.21 weeks. Median age at first consultancy was 9.7 month. Median postmenstrual age first consultancy was 52 weeks. All infants were never screened for ROP before they came to the referral center. Of twenty stage 5 ROP infants, 13 cases presented with bilateral stage 5 features. Of the 40 eyes of 20 infants, 33 eyes were diagnosed as stage 5. Leukocoric pupil, closed funnel configuration of retinal detachment (RD), posterior synechia, extraretinal fibrovascular proliferation and retinal folds were the most significant indicators of bad prognosis. Ten eyes appeared no fixation to light, while 30 eyes exhibited following to light or following to toys. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that in relatively less-developed regions of China, more needs to be done to spread awareness about the disease among pediatricians, neonatologists and ophthalmologists as well as parents of premature infants. Thus, a comprehensive control system which is a whole network of propaganda, screening, treatment and follow-up are encouraged especially in less developed areas in China as well as worldwide.

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in patients who have not had a sustained virologic response to prior interferon-based therapy represents an unmet medical need. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, randomized, open-label study involving patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who had not had a sustained virologic response after treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, with or without a protease inhibitor. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir in a once-daily, fixed-dose combination tablet for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Among the 440 patients who underwent randomization and were treated, 20% had cirrhosis and 79% had HCV genotype 1a infection. The rates of sustained virologic response were high in all treatment groups: 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87 to 97) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; 96% (95% CI, 91 to 99) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin; 99% (95% CI, 95 to 100) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and 99% (95% CI, 95 to 100) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin. No patient discontinued treatment owing to an adverse event. The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with a once-daily, single-tablet regimen of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had not had a sustained virologic response to prior interferon-based treatment. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ION-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01768286.).

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir Plus Ribavirin in Veterans With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 Infection, Compensated Cirrhosis, and Multiple Comorbidities.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We conducted a phase 4, open-label study with limited exclusion criteria to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir and ribavirin in veterans with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection, and compensated cirrhosis. This population is often excluded from clinical studies. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of treatment-naive (n = 47) and treatment-experienced (n = 19) patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection and compensated cirrhosis at 15 Department of Veterans Affairs sites. All subjects were given sofosbuvir (400 mg, once daily) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) in divided doses for 12 weeks. Patients with major psychiatric diseases or alcohol or substance use disorders were not excluded. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients achieved a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (79%; 95% confidence interval, 67%-88%); 16 of these patients were treatment experienced (84%; 95% confidence interval, 60%-97%) and 36 were treatment naive (77%; 95% confidence interval, 62%-88%). All patients had at least 1 comorbidity. Thirty-five percent had depression, 24% had posttraumatic stress disorder, and 30% had anxiety disorder. In addition, 29% had current substance use. Of the 7 patients (11%) who discontinued the study treatment prematurely, 3 did so because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were fatigue, anemia, nausea, and headache. Serious adverse events occurred in 8 patients. Only 2 of the serious adverse events (anemia and nausea) were considered to be related to study treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 4 study, 12 weeks treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin led to a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy in almost 80% of veterans with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 infection, compensated cirrhosis, and multiple comorbidities, regardless of their treatment history. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02128542.

Safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for the treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C in subjects aged 65 years or older.

UNLABELLED: Elderly subjects have been historically underrepresented in clinical trials involving antiviral hepatitis C therapies. The aim of this analysis was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) by age groups of <65 years versus ≥65 years among subjects enrolled in phase 3 trials. Four open-label phase 3 clinical trials evaluated the safety and efficacy of LDV/SOF with or without ribavirin (RBV) for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), and graded laboratory abnormalities were analyzed according to age group. Of the 2293 subjects enrolled in four phase 3 trials, 264 (12%) were ≥65 years of age, of whom 24 were aged ≥75 years. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks was achieved by 97% (1965/2029) of subjects aged <65 years and 98% (258/264) of subjects aged ≥65 years. The most common AEs in both LDV/SOF groups that occurred in ≥10% of subjects were headache and fatigue. The rate of study discontinuation due to AEs was similar in the two age cohorts. The use of RBV in 1042 (45%) subjects increased the number of AEs, treatment-related AEs, and AEs leading to study drug modification/interruption, particularly among elderly subjects. CONCLUSIONS: LDV/SOF with or without RBV was highly effective for treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virusin subjects aged 65 and older. Addition of RBV did not increase sustained virological response at 12 weeks rates but led to higher rates of AEs, especially in elderly subjects.

Safety and efficacy of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in black patients with hepatitis C virus infection: A retrospective analysis of phase 3 data.

UNLABELLED: Black patients chronically infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) have historically had lower rates of response to interferon-based treatment than patients of other races. In the phase 3 ION program, the single-tablet regimen of the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and NS5B nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir was shown to be safe and highly effective in the general population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in black patients using data from the three open-label ION clinical trials, which evaluated the safety and efficacy of 8, 12, and 24 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin for the treatment of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 HCV, including those with compensated cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). For our analysis, rates of SVR12, treatment-emergent adverse events, and graded laboratory abnormalities were analyzed in black versus non-black patients. Of the 1949 patients evaluated, 308 (16%) were black. On average, black patients were older, had higher body mass index, were more likely to be IL28B non-CC, and had a lower serum alanine aminotransferase at baseline than non-black patients. Overall, 95% of black and 97% of non-black patients achieved SVR12. The rate of relapse was 3% in black patients as compared with 2% in non-black patients. The most common adverse events included fatigue, headache, nausea, and insomnia. The majority of adverse events occurred more frequently in the ribavirin-containing arms of the studies. No differences were observed in overall safety by race. CONCLUSION: A once-daily dosage of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was similarly effective in black and non-black patients with genotype 1 HCV infection. The addition of ribavirin did not appear to increase SVR12 but was associated with higher rates of adverse events.

[The Establishment and Identification of Stable CHO Cell Line with Canine Transferrin Receptor Expression].

OBJECTIVES: To construct eukaryotic expressing recombinant vector of canine transferrin receptor gene (TfR ), then to transfect Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells with the vector for establishment of stable expression of TfR in CHO cell line. METHODS: The full-length TfR fragment was amplified by RT-PCR from the canine cells (walter reed dog cell, WRD) and then inserted into eukaryotic expression vector pCDNA3. After identification with enzyme digestion and sequencing, the recombinant vector was transfected into CHO cells by TransLipid Transfection Reagent. The stable transfected CHO cell line was then established by screening cultures with G418, and the expression of TfR was identified by RT-PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence, respectively. RESULTS: The eukaryotic expression vector pCDNA3-TfR was constructed successfully by checking with enzyme digestion and sequencing, and the highly expressed canine TfR was observed in CHO cells transfected with pCDNA3-TfR by using RT-PCR, Western blot and immunofluorescence, respectively. The stable CHO cell line with canine TfR expression was established. CONCLUSIONS: The construction of the eukaryotic expression vector pCDNA3-TfR and the establishment of stable CHO cell line with TfR expression provide solid foundation for further experimental studies on the function of TfR.

Efficacy and Safety of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir With and Without Ribavirin in Patients With Chronic HCV Genotype 1 Infection Receiving Opioid Substitution Therapy: Analysis of Phase 3 ION Trials.

BACKGROUND: Interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy is safe and effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but treatment uptake remains low. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of OST and drug use during therapy on completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin. METHODS: The phase 3 ION studies evaluated a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin administered for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1. People with clinically significant drug use (prior 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening by urine drug tests (not explained by prescriptions) were ineligible. Stored samples were available from ION-1 for retrospective testing for illicit drugs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: Among 1952 patients enrolled in the ION studies, 4% (n = 70) were receiving OST. Among those receiving (n = 70) and not receiving OST (n = 1882), there was no difference in treatment completion (97% vs 98%; P = .40), ≥80% adherence (93% vs 92%; P = 1.00), SVR12 (94% vs 97%; P = .28), and serious adverse events (4% vs 3%; P = .43), respectively. Among participants in the ION-1 trial, 23% (n = 196) used illicit drugs during therapy (15% cannabinoids alone; 8% other illicit drugs ± cannabinoids). There was no difference in treatment completion, ≥80% adherence, SVR12, or serious AEs in those with no drug use during treatment compared with those who used cannabinoids and/or other illicit drugs. No cases of HCV reinfection were observed in the 24 weeks following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: OST and drug use during HCV therapy did not impact treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, or safety. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ION-1 (NCT01701401); ION-2 (NCT01768286); and ION-3 (NCT01851330).

Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus previously treated in clinical trials of sofosbuvir regimens.

UNLABELLED: Patients who fail to achieve sustained virological response (SVR) after treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) plus ribavirin (RBV) with or without pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) do not have established retreatment options. We conducted an open-label trial to assess the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir (LDV)-SOF plus RBV in patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) who did not achieve SVR after treatment in phase II and III trials of SOF regimens. We enrolled 51 patients at 24 sites in the United States. All patients received the fixed-dose combination tablet of LDV-SOF once-daily plus weight-based RBV (1,000 or 1,200 mg/day) for 12 weeks. The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with SVR 12 weeks after discontinuation of therapy (SVR12). Of the 51 patients enrolled, 25 (49%) had previously received SOF plus Peg-IFN-RBV, 20 (39%) had received SOF-RBV, 5 (10%) had received SOF placebo plus Peg-IFN-RBV, and 1 (2%) received GS-0938 monotherapy. Fourteen (27%) had compensated cirrhosis at baseline, and 47 (92%) had non-CC interleukin-28B genotypes. SVR12 was achieved by 50 of the 51 patients (98%) treated. Among the 45 patients who received SOF in earlier treatment, 44 (98%) achieved SVR12. The only patient who did not achieve SVR12 was a patient with genotype 3a HCV who had been incorrectly genotyped as 1a in the previous study. Given the high rates of SVR12, no differences among patient subgroups were discernible. Of 51 patients, 41 (80%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE), but most events were mild to moderate in severity. The most common AEs were fatigue, headache, and diarrhea. One patient discontinued treatment because of an unrelated AE (bipolar disorder). CONCLUSION: Twelve weeks of LDV-SOF plus RBV was an effective and safe treatment for patients who have not achieved SVR with earlier regimens that included SOF.

Combination of systemic chemotherapy with local stem cell delivered S-TRAIL in resected brain tumors.

Despite advances in standard therapies, the survival of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients has not improved. Limitations to successful translation of new therapies include poor delivery of systemic therapies and use of simplified preclinical models which fail to reflect the clinical complexity of GBMs. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis specifically in tumor cells and we have tested its efficacy by on-site delivery via engineered stem cells (SC) in mouse models of GBM that mimic the clinical scenario of tumor aggressiveness and resection. However, about half of tumor lines are resistant to TRAIL and overcoming TRAIL-resistance in GBM by combining therapeutic agents that are currently in clinical trials with SC-TRAIL and understanding the molecular dynamics of these combination therapies are critical to the broad use of TRAIL as a therapeutic agent in clinics. In this study, we screened clinically relevant chemotherapeutic agents for their ability to sensitize resistant GBM cell lines to TRAIL induced apoptosis. We show that low dose cisplatin increases surface receptor expression of death receptor 4/5 post G2 cycle arrest and sensitizes GBM cells to TRAIL induced apoptosis. In vivo, using an intracranial resection model of resistant primary human-derived GBM and real-time optical imaging, we show that a low dose of cisplatin in combination with synthetic extracellular matrix encapsulated SC-TRAIL significantly decreases tumor regrowth and increases survival in mice bearing GBM. This study has the potential to help expedite effective translation of local stem cell-based delivery of TRAIL into the clinical setting to target a broad spectrum of GBMs.

Multifunctional receptor-targeting antibodies for cancer therapy.

During the past decade, monospecific antibodies targeting cell-surface receptors in different tumour types have achieved substantial success and have been at the forefront of cancer treatment. However, redundant signalling and crosstalk between different pathways within tumour cells and between tumour cells and their microenvironment can limit the efficacy of receptor-targeted monospecific-based therapies. Advances in antibody engineering technologies have enabled strategies that simultaneously target multiple receptors to circumvent the limitations of conventional monospecific therapies and achieve enhanced therapeutic efficacy. In the past 5 years, a range of multifunctional, receptor-targeting, antibody-based molecules have emerged, which allow targeting of multiple surface receptors on tumour cells and endothelial or immune cells in the tumour microenvironment. In this Review, we discuss the rationales and strategies for the use of multifunctional receptor-targeting antibodies, their mechanisms of action, and the promises and challenges they hold as cancer therapeutics. This knowledge provides opportunities to improve current targeted therapy outcomes for patients with cancer.

All-oral combination of ledipasvir, vedroprevir, tegobuvir, and ribavirin in treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 HCV infection.

UNLABELLED: This phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of the nonstructural protein (NS)5A inhibitor ledipasvir (LDV), NS3 protease inhibitor vedroprevir (VDV), non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor tegobuvir (TGV), and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 without cirrhosis. Patients were randomized 1:2 to LDV 30 mg once daily (QD; Arm 1; n = 46) or LDV 90 mg QD (Arm 2; n = 94); patients in both arms also received VDV 200 mg QD, TGV 30 mg twice-daily, and RBV 1,000-1,200 mg/day. Patients in Arm 2 with vRVR, defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) from treatment weeks 2 to 10, were randomized 1:1 to stop treatment at 12 weeks or continue for 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) was higher in patients receiving 90 mg of LDV for 24 weeks (63%), compared with LDV 90 mg for 12 weeks (54%) and LDV 30 mg for 24 weeks (48%). In patients with very rapid virologic response (vRVR) in Arm 2, SVR12 was achieved by 68% and 81% of patients treated for 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. Virologic breakthrough was more common in patients with HCV genotype 1a and was associated with resistance-associated variants for all three direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs); however, in all but 1 patient who relapsed, resistance-associated variants directed against only one or two of the DAAs were detected. The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, nausea, rash, and diarrhea. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCV genotype 1, an interferon-free regimen containing LDV/VDV/TGV/RBV was well tolerated and led to SVR12 in up to 63% of patients. LDV 90 mg is currently being investigated in combination with the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, sofosbuvir.