FDA Approval Summary: Axicabtagene Ciloleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma.

In March 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration granted accelerated approval to axicabtagene ciloleucel, a CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL) after at least 2 lines of systemic therapy. Approval was based on ZUMA-5, a single-arm, open-label, multicenter trial that evaluated a single infusion of axicabtagene ciloleucel, preceded by lymphodepleting chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine, in this population. Efficacy was based on objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR) as determined by an independent review committee. Among 81 patients in the primary efficacy analysis, having a median of 3 (range 2-9) prior lines of systemic therapy, the ORR was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 83-96) with a complete remission (CR) rate of 60% and a median time-to-response of 1 month. The median DOR was not reached, and the 1-year rate of continued remission was 76% (95% CI: 64-85). For all leukapheresed patients with FL in this trial (n = 123), the ORR was 89% (95% CI: 83-94) with a CR rate of 62%. Among 146 patients with indolent lymphoma evaluated for safety, cytokine release syndrome occurred in 84% (Grade ≥3, 8%) and neurological toxicities occurred in 77% (Grade ≥3, 21%), leading to implementation of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 48%. Post-marketing studies will further evaluate clinical benefit in patients with r/r FL and long-term safety.

Idasanutlin and navitoclax induce synergistic apoptotic cell death in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy in which activating mutations in the Notch pathway are thought to contribute to transformation, in part, by activating c-Myc. Increased c-Myc expression induces oncogenic stress that can trigger apoptosis through the MDM2-p53 tumor suppressor pathway. Since the great majority of T-ALL cases carry inactivating mutations upstream in this pathway but maintain wildtype MDM2 and TP53, we hypothesized that T-ALL would be selectively sensitive to MDM2 inhibition. Treatment with idasanutlin, an MDM2 inhibitor, induced only modest apoptosis in T-ALL cells but upregulated the pro-apoptotic BH3 domain genes BAX and BBC3, prompting us to evaluate the combination of idasanutlin with BH3 mimetics. Combination treatment with idasanutlin and navitoclax, a potent Bcl-2/Bcl-xL inhibitor, induces more consistent and potent synergistic killing of T-ALL PDX lines in vitro than venetoclax, a Bcl-2 specific inhibitor. Moreover, a marked synergic response to combination treatment with idasanutlin and navitoclax was seen in vivo in all four T-ALL xenografts tested, with a significant increase in overall survival in the combination treatment group. Collectively, these preclinical data show that the combination of idasanutlin and navitoclax is highly active in T-ALL and may merit consideration in the clinical setting.

Performance measures to benchmark the grasping, manipulation, and assembly of deformable objects typical to manufacturing applications.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology is developing performance tests and associated artifacts to benchmark research in the area of robotic assembly. Sets of components consistent with mechanical assemblies including screws, gears, electrical connectors, wires, and belts are configured for assembly or disassembly using a task board concept. Test protocols accompany the task boards and are designed to mimic low-volume, high-mixture assembly challenges typical to small and medium sized manufacturers. In addition to the typical rigid components found in assembled products, the task boards include many non-rigid component operations representative of wire harness and belt drive assemblies to support research in the area of grasping and manipulation of deformable objects, an area still considered to be an emerging research problem in robotics. A set of four primary task boards as well as competition task boards are presented as benchmarks along with scoring metrics and a method to compare robot system assembly times with human performance. Competitions are used to raise awareness to these benchmarks. Tools to progress and compare research are described along with emphasis placed on system competition-based solutions to grasp and manipulate deformable task board components.