The risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer: new parameters to assess the degree of submucosal invasion.

PURPOSE: In T1 colorectal cancer, the depth is the main factor assessing the degree of submucosal invasion (DSI) to predict the risk of lymph node metastasis (LNM). The width (WSI) and the area of submucosal invasion (ASI) have been suggested as additional parameters to assess the risk of LNM. A review of the literature was undertaken on the correlation between WSI and ASI parameters and the incidence of LNM. METHODS: A Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Library search was performed to retrieve all studies reporting correlation between WSI/ASI and risk of LNM in T1 colorectal cancer. RESULTS: Eight studies including 1727 patients were identified. All considered the degree of WSI and its influence on LNM: seven assessed different width cut-off of submucosal invasion, and one study the mean width of submucosal invasion in patients having or not involved lymph nodes. The WSI was significantly a prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05) in four studies. Both 2 and 3 mm seem to be the most discriminatory cut-off values of submucosal width invasion in defining the risk difference of LNM above and below the cut-off (2 mm, OR = infinite; 3 mm, OR = 6.9). Patients having a cut-off ≤ 5 mm of WSI showed a low risk (5.6%) of LNM rendering radical surgery unnecessary. Four studies assessed the risk of LNM according to the involved submucosal area (width × depth). In two of these, the ASI was a significant prognostic factor for LNM (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The WSI and ASI seem to be reliable prognostic factors for LNM in T1 colorectal cancer. There is no agreement on ideal cut-off value.

A simple bowel habit score for colorectal patients.

PURPOSE: The assessment of bowel habit is important in the management of patients with colorectal disease. There is not an ideal and practical bowel habit scoring system. The current scores have been designed only for a subclass of patients having a particular disorder. Furthemore, they are complex and time consuming. We propose a simple score to quickly assess the bowel function in all patients with proctological disorders. METHODS: We developed a bowel habit scoring system including three parameters: bowel frequency, stool consistency, and urgency. A three-point scale was applied. Three main categories of bowel habit were derived: slow (3-4 points), normal (5-6 points), and quick (7-9 points). We applied this score to all patients undergoing colorectal visit in outpatient office between January 2014 and December 2015. RESULTS: Eight hundred and ninety patients were included. In 819 patients (92 %), the score was completed. The mean time to assess the score was 28 s (range 12-80 s). The mean age was 49.2 years (range 14-93). The males were 435 (53.1 %). Two hundred and forty patients (29.3 %) had "slow", 521(63.6 %) had "normal", and 58 (7.1 %) had "quick" habit. Patients with constipation or fissure had higher incidence of slow habit compared with all other patients (60.5 vs 25.2 %, P < 0.05; 42.8 vs 17.2 %, P < 0.05). Patients with incontinence or inflammatory bowel disease had higher incidence of quick bowel habit compared with all other patients (72.7 vs 5.7 %, P < 0.05; 28.5 vs 5.6%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This bowel habit score is easy and quick to apply with high rate of feasibility. It could be useful to manage patients with colorectal disorders.

Blind loop perforation after side-to-side ileocolonic anastomosis.

Blind loop syndrome after side-to-side ileocolonic anastomosis is a well-recognized entity even though its incidence and complication rates are not clearly defined. The inevitable dilation of the ileal cul-de-sac leads to stasis and bacterial overgrowth which eventually leads to mucosal ulceration and even full-thickness perforation. Blind loop syndrome may be an underestimated complication in the setting of digestive surgery. It should always be taken into account in cases of acute abdomen in patients who previously underwent right hemicolectomy. We herein report 3 patients who were diagnosed with perforative blind loop syndrome a few years after standard right hemicolectomy followed by a side-to-side ileocolonic anastomosis.

Dysphagia and clinical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen or Rossetti fundoplication: sequential prospective study.

Laparoscopic fundoplication represents the most widely used operation in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Besides being operator-dependent, the clinical outcome (efficacy and side-effects) seems also to be dependent on the specific surgical technique. In this prospective trial we compared the results of two groups of patients who were submitted sequentially to the Rossetti or Nissen fundoplication procedure. Dysphagia, other side effects, and clinical outcome were evaluated early after surgery and at 6 and 12 months after the operation. Although both procedures were clinically effective, there was a significant trend toward less postoperative dysphagia in the Nissen group. In these patients the incidence of early dysphagia was significantly lower than that observed in those submitted to the Rossetti fundoplication. In addition, Nissen patients experienced a significantly smaller number of days with dysphagia. One year after surgery, however, the two procedures proved equally successful without any significant difference in dysphagia incidence. Complete fundic mobilization should therefore be advised to reduce the incidence of early troublesome dysphagia.

Haemorrhagic radiation proctitis: endoscopic severity may be useful to guide therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Management of haemorrhagic radiation proctitis remains controversial. Both endoscopically delivered argon plasma coagulation and rectal administration of formalin have been recommended. We evaluated the efficacy of argon plasma coagulation according to endoscopic severity of radiation proctitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients treated with argon plasma coagulation for rectal bleeding due to radiation proctitis were reviewed. Patients were classified with a new endoscopic score for haemorrhagic radiation proctitis, comprising three factors: telangiectasia distribution, surface area involved, and presence of fresh blood. Seven patients were categorised as having grade A (mild), four grade B (moderate), and three grade C (severe) radiation proctitis. Rectal bleeding was assessed pre- and post-treatment using a five-point bleeding scale. RESULTS: All patients with grade A and B radiation proctitis were treated successfully by argon plasma coagulation (mean 1.5 sessions). In one patient with grade C radiation proctitis argon plasma coagulation was successful after four sessions, but in the other two patients bleeding could not be controlled; a subsequent single formalin administration was successful in both. Overall in 12 patients (85.7%) bleeding ceased or improved significantly. The mean rectal bleeding scale reduced significantly from 2.6 to 0.9. One patient treated with argon plasma coagulation developed an asymptomatic rectosigmoid stenosis. CONCLUSION: Argon plasma coagulation is a simple, safe and efficacious therapy for mild/moderate radiation proctitis. In patients with severe radiation proctitis several sessions are usually necessary, and success is not certain; in these cases, topical formalin administration may be more effective. Endoscopic severity of haemorrhagic radiation proctitis may be useful to guide appropriate therapy.

Long-term outcome after inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: case-matched study.

The purpose of this study was to compare early and late outcomes after inflammatory and noninflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair with emphasis on graft-related complications. Of 625 consecutive patients submitted to AAA repair, 18 were classified as having inflammatory AAAs (group 1). The results of this group were compared with those of 54 patients (group 2) retrospectively drawn from patients who underwent aortic replacement for noninflammatory AAAs. A computer-assisted matching system was used to match patients according to date of birth, gender, and surgical priority. All patients of both groups were followed by periodic clinical and instrumental examinations. Patients in group 1 complained more frequently of aneurysm-related symptoms (72% vs. 20%; p = 0.0001), and their erythrocyte sedimentation rate was elevated more often (78% vs. 19%; p < 0.0001). Surgical morbidity and mortality rates were not different. The mean lengths of follow-up were 61 +/- 47 months (group 1) and 71 +/- 38 months (group 2). The 10-year overall survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (49.1% +/- 16.9% for group 1 vs. 61.6% +/- 13.8% for group 2; p = 0.26, log-rank test). In contrast, the free from paraanastomotic aneurysm survival rates were significantly lower in group 1 (57.3% +/- 20.2% vs. 97.8% +/- 2.5% at 10 years; p = 0.025, log-rank test). Long-term outcomes showed a higher incidence of graft-related complications in group 1. As inflammatory aneurysms might represent a risk factor for the development of paraanastomotic aneurysms, routine imaging surveillance of graft aortic healing after inflammatory AAA repair is warranted.