Prognostic heterogeneity among patients with chronic stable coronary disease: determinants of long-term mortality after treatment with percutaneous intervention.

AIMS: To evaluate the risk and predictors of death in a large population of patients with stable coronary disease treated with percutaneous intervention. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 1,276 patients with chronic angina or silent ischaemia who underwent elective coronary angioplasty. Baseline and in-hospital mortality data were prospectively collected for all patients during the index hospitalisation. Post-discharge outcome was assessed at out-patient clinic, by review of the patients' records, or direct phone contact. Deaths were classified as cardiac and non-cardiac. Age, peripheral arterial disease, congestive heart failure with NYHA class >or= III, triple-vessel disease, and procedural success (i.e. angiographic success for all lesions in the absence of peri-procedural infarction) remained as multivariate independent predictors of death. For the entire population 4-year cumulative all-cause and cardiac mortality were respectively 5.4% and 4.1%. Four-year mortality for patients without any multivariate predictor was 2.4%, while for patients with two or more predictors the death rate was 16.3% after four years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stable coronary disease undergoing percutaneous treatment have an overall low mortality rate after four years. Nevertheless, stable patients comprise a heterogeneous population in terms of risk profile, ranging from patients at very low risk of late death to individuals with a poor long-term prognosis.

Angiographic segment size in patients referred for coronary intervention is influenced by constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features.

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing the size of target vessels of patients referred for coronary intervention are poorly defined. We aimed to investigate in a large series of patients undergoing percutaneous intervention the relation of constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features with the reference diameter of coronary vessels treated with stenting. METHODS: A total of 4,850 de novo coronary lesions, non-ostial and non-bifurcational, located in native vessels were analyzed. The following pre-specified characteristics were analyzed to reflect the relation between constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features on reference vessel diameter: age, gender, height, weight, proximal location, vessel, diabetes, hypertension, multivessel disease, and clinical presentation. RESULTS: The average reference diameter was 2.66+/-0.50 mm. All pre-specified markers had a significant relation with the vessel reference diameter at univariate analysis, except by hypertension which showed a strong tendency. However, at multivariate analysis, only diabetes, proximal location, multivessel disease, clinical presentation, vessel, weight, and height were identified as independent predictors of reference vessel diameter. CONCLUSION: Reference diameter of coronary vessels at the site of lesions treated by stenting is significantly influenced by a variety of characteristics. We hypothesize that the treated segment size of patients undergoing stenting ultimately reflects the conjoint effect of several different factors, including constitutional, anatomical, and clinical features.

Stenting vs. balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting for the treatment of vessels with small reference diameter.

A consecutive series of interventions in vessels with reference diameter < or = 2.75 mm was retrospectively analyzed according to preprocedure strategy: balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting (PTCA group, 73 patients) and primary stenting (PS group, 122 patients). In the PS group, there were more patients with single-vessel disease (54.1% vs. 37.0%; P = 0.021), less patients with three-vessel disease (9.0% vs. 24.7%; P = 0.003), more LAD interventions (54.9% vs. 31.5; P = 0.002), and less left circumflex interventions (22.1% vs. 45.2%; P < 0.001). Reference diameter was larger in the PS group (2.28 +/- 0.35 mm vs. 2.11 +/- 0.36 mm; P = 0.001). Provisional stenting was performed in 39.7% of PTCA group. At long-term outcome, the incidence of composite major events was similar between the PTCA and the PS groups (20.5% vs. 17.2%, respectively; P = NS). Treatment of small vessels with balloon dilatation and provisional stenting or with primary stenting yielded similar late outcomes. Operators' choice of treatment strategy was based on particular angiographic characteristics.