Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations.

Blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), that is, renin inhibitors, angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Ang II type 1 receptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, are a cornerstone in the treatment of hypertension. How exactly they exert their effect, in particular in patients with low circulating RAAS activity, also taking into consideration the so-called Ang II/aldosterone escape that often occurs after initial blockade, is still incompletely understood. Multiple studies have tried to find parameters that predict the response to RAAS blockade, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Consequently, the question should now be answered on what basis (eg, sex, ethnicity, age, salt intake, baseline renin, ACE or aldosterone, and genetic variance) a RAAS blocker can be chosen to treat an individual patient. Are all blockers equal? Does optimal blockade imply maximum RAAS blockade, for example, by combining ≥2 RAAS blockers or by simply increasing the dose of 1 blocker? Exciting recent investigations reveal a range of unanticipated extrarenal effects of aldosterone, as well as a detailed insight in the genetic causes of primary aldosteronism, and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers have now become an important treatment option for resistant hypertension. Finally, apart from the deleterious ACE-Ang II-Ang II type 1 receptor arm, animal studies support the existence of protective aminopeptidase A-Ang III-Ang II type 2 receptor and ACE2-Ang-(1 to 7)-Mas receptor arms, paving the way for multiple new treatment options. This review provides an update about all these aspects, critically discussing the many controversies and allowing the reader to obtain a full understanding of what we currently know about RAAS alterations in hypertension.

Deterioration of kidney function by the (pro)renin receptor blocker handle region peptide in aliskiren-treated diabetic transgenic (mRen2)27 rats.

Dual renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in diabetic nephropathy is no longer feasible because of the profit/side effect imbalance. (Pro)renin receptor [(P)RR] blockade with handle region peptide (HRP) has been reported to exert beneficial effects in various diabetic models in a RAS-independent manner. To what degree (P)RR blockade adds benefits on top of RAS blockade is still unknown. In the present study, we treated diabetic TGR(mREN2)27 rats, a well-established nephropathy model with high prorenin levels [allowing continuous (P)RR stimulation in vivo], with HRP on top of renin inhibition with aliskiren. Aliskiren alone lowered blood pressure and exerted renoprotective effects, as evidenced by reduced glomerulosclerosis, diuresis, proteinuria, albuminuria, and urinary aldosterone levels as well as diminished renal (P)RR and ANG II type 1 receptor expression. It also suppressed plasma and tissue RAS activity and suppressed cardiac atrial natriuretic peptide and brain natriuretic peptide expression. HRP, when given on top of aliskiren, did not alter the effects of renin inhibition on blood pressure, RAS activity, or aldosterone. However, it counteracted the beneficial effects of aliskiren in the kidney, induced hyperkalemia, and increased plasma plasminogen activator-inhibitor 1, renal cyclooxygenase-2, and cardiac collagen content. All these effects have been linked to (P)RR stimulation, suggesting that HRP might, in fact, act as a partial agonist. Therefore, the use of HRP on top of RAS blockade in diabetic nephropathy is not advisable.

The genetic architecture of phenotypic diversity in the Betta fish (Betta splendens).

The Betta fish displays a remarkable variety of phenotypes selected during domestication. However, the genetic basis underlying these traits remains largely unexplored. Here, we report a high-quality genome assembly and resequencing of 727 individuals representing diverse morphotypes of the Betta fish. We show that current breeds have a complex domestication history with extensive introgression with wild species. Using a genome-wide association study, we identify the genetic basis of multiple traits, including coloration patterns, the "Dumbo" phenotype with pectoral fin outgrowth, extraordinary enlargement of body size that we map to a major locus on chromosome 8, the sex determination locus that we map to dmrt1, and the long-fin phenotype that maps to the locus containing kcnj15. We also identify a polygenic signal related to aggression, involving multiple neural system-related genes such as esyt2, apbb2, and pank2. Our study provides a resource for developing the Betta fish as a genetic model for morphological and behavioral research in vertebrates.

Cardiovascular phenotype of mice lacking all three subtypes of angiotensin II receptors.

Angiotensin II activates two distinct receptors, the angiotensin II receptors type 1 (AT(1)) and type 2 (AT(2)). In rodents, two AT(1) subtypes were identified (AT(1a) and AT(1b)). To determine receptor-specific functions and possible angiotensin II effects independent of its three known receptors we generated mice deficient in either one of the angiotensin II receptors, in two, or in all three (triple knockouts). Triple knockouts were vital and fertile, but survival was impaired. Hypotension and renal histological abnormalities in triple knockouts were comparable to those in mice lacking both AT(1) subtypes. All combinations lacking AT(1a) were distinguished by reduced heart rate. AT(1a) deletion impaired the in vivo pressor response to angiotensin II bolus injection, whereas deficiency for AT(1b) and/or AT(2) had no effect. However, the additional lack of AT(1b) in AT(1a)-deficient mice further impaired the vasoconstrictive capacity of angiotensin II. Although general vasoconstrictor properties were not changed, angiotensin II failed to alter blood pressure in triple knockouts, indicating that there are no other receptors involved in direct angiotensin II pressor effects. Our data identify mice deficient in all three angiotensin II receptors as an ideal tool to better understand the structure and function of the renin-angiotensin system and to search for angiotensin II effects independent of AT(1) and AT(2).

Prorenin anno 2008.

For many years, prorenin has been considered to be nothing more than the inactive precursor of renin. Yet, its elevated levels in diabetic subjects with microvascular complications and its extrarenal production at various sites in the body suggest otherwise. This review discusses the origin, regulation, and enzymatic activity of prorenin, its role during renin inhibition, and the angiotensin-dependent and angiotensin-independent consequences of its binding to the recently discovered (pro)renin receptor. The review ends with the concept that prorenin rather than renin determines tissue angiotensin generation.

Different contributions of the angiotensin-converting enzyme C-domain and N-domain in subjects with the angiotensin-converting enzyme II and DD genotype.

BACKGROUND: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism-related differences in ACE concentration do not result in differences in angiotensin levels. METHODS AND RESULTS: To investigate whether this relates to differences in the contribution of the ACE C-domain and N-domain, we quantified, using the C-domain-selective inhibitors quinaprilat and RXPA380, and the N-domain-selective inhibitor RXP407, the contribution of both domains to the metabolism of angiotensin I, bradykinin, the C-domain-selective substrate Mca-BK(1-8), and the N-domain-selective substrate Mca-Ala in serum of IIs, DDs, and 'hyperACE' subjects (i.e., subjects with increased ACE due to enhanced shedding). During incubation with angiotensin I, the highest angiotensin II levels were observed in sera with the highest ACE activity. This confirms that ACE is rate-limiting with regard to angiotensin II generation. C-domain-selective concentrations of quinaprilat fully blocked angiotensin I-II conversion in DDs, whereas additional N-domain blockade was required to fully block conversion in IIs. Both domains contributed to bradykinin hydrolysis in all subjects, and the inhibition profile of RXP407 when using Mca-Ala was identical in IIs and DDs. In contrast, the RXPA380 concentrations required to block C-domain activity when using Mca-BK (1-8) were three-fold higher in IIs than DDs. CONCLUSION: The contributions of the C-domain and N-domain differ between DDs and IIs, and RXPA380 is the first inhibitor capable of distinguishing D-allele ACE from I-allele ACE. The lack of angiotensin II accumulation in DDs in vivo is not because of the often quoted concept that ACE is a nonrate-limiting enzyme. It may relate to the fact that in IIs both the N-domain and C- domain generate angiotensin II, whereas in DDs only the C-domain converts angiotensin I.

Effects of angiotensin II and its metabolites in the rat coronary vascular bed: is angiotensin III the preferred ligand of the angiotensin AT2 receptor?

Aminopeptidases metabolize angiotensin II to angiotensin-(2-8) (=angiotensin III) and angiotensin-(3-8) (=angiotensin IV), and carboxypeptidases generate angiotensin-(1-7) from angiotensin I and II. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and/or angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers affect the concentrations of these metabolites, and they may thus contribute to the beneficial effects of these drugs, possibly through stimulation of non-classical angiotensin AT receptors. Here, we investigated the effects of angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) in the rat coronary vascular bed, with or without angiotensin AT1 - or angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor blockade. Results were compared to those in rat iliac arteries and abdominal aortas. Angiotensin II, angiotensin III and angiotensin IV constricted coronary arteries via angiotensin AT1 receptor stimulation, angiotensin III and angiotensin IV being approximately 20- and approximately 8000-fold less potent than angiotensin II. The angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist PD123319 greatly enhanced the constrictor effects of angiotensin III, starting at angiotensin III concentrations in the low nanomolar range. PD123319 enhanced the angiotensin II-induced constriction at submicromolar angiotensin II concentrations only. Angiotensin-(1-7) exerted no effects in the coronary circulation, although, at micromolar concentrations, it blocked angiotensin AT1 receptor-induced constriction. Angiotensin AT2 receptor-mediated relaxation did not occur in iliac arteries and abdominal aortas, and the constrictor effects of the angiotensin metabolites in these vessels were identical to those in the coronary vascular bed. In conclusion, angiotensin AT2 receptor activation in the rat coronary vascular bed results in vasodilation, and angiotensin III rather than angiotensin II is the preferred endogenous agonist of these receptors. Angiotensin II, angiotensin III, angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1-7) do not exert effects through non-classical angiotensin AT receptors in the rat coronary vascular bed, iliac artery or aorta.

Carvedilol-induced antagonism of angiotensin II: a matter of alpha1-adrenoceptor blockade.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether renin-angiotensin system blockade might underlie the favorable metabolic effects of the nonselective beta + alpha1-adrenoceptor blocker carvedilol as compared with the selective beta1-adrenoceptor blocker metoprolol. METHODS: Human coronary microarteries (HCMAs), obtained from 32 heart valve donors, were mounted in myographs. RESULTS: Angiotensin II and the alpha1-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine constricted HCMAs to maximally 63 +/- 10 and 46 +/- 15% of the contraction to 100 mmol/l K. Neither carvedilol, metoprolol, the nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol, nor the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin affected the constrictor response to angiotensin II. alpha1-adrenoreceptors and beta-adrenoceptors are thus not involved in the direct constrictor effects of angiotensin II. When added to the organ bath at a subthreshold concentration, angiotensin II greatly amplified the response to phenylephrine. Both carvedilol and the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist irbesartan inhibited this angiotensin II-induced potentiation. Furthermore, carvedilol blocked the angiotensin II-induced amplification of phenylephrine-induced inositol phosphate accumulation in cardiomyocytes. CONCLUSIONS: AT1-alpha1-receptor crosstalk, involving inositol phosphates, sensitizes HCMAs to alpha1-adrenoceptor agonists. Our results suggest that, in the presence of an increased sympathetic tone, carvedilol provides AT1 receptor blockade via its alpha1-adrenoceptor blocking effects. This could explain the favorable effects of carvedilol versus metoprolol.

AT2 receptor-mediated vasodilation in the mouse heart depends on AT1A receptor activation.

Angiotensin (Ang) II type 2 (AT(2)) receptors are believed to counteract Ang II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor-mediated effects. Here, we investigated AT(2) receptor-mediated effects on coronary and cardiac contractility in C57BL/6 mice. Hearts were perfused according to Langendorff. Baseline coronary flow (CF) and left ventricular systolic pressure (LVSP) were 2.7 +/- 0.1 ml min(-1) and 111 +/- 3 mmHg (n = 50), respectively. Ang II (n = 14) concentration dependently decreased CF and LVSP, by maximally 41 +/- 4 and 25 +/- 3%, respectively (pEC(50)s 7.41 +/- 0.12 and 7.65 +/- 0.12). The AT(1) receptor antagonist irbesartan (n = 4) abolished all Ang II-induced changes, whereas the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319 (n = 6) enhanced (P < 0.05) the effect of Ang II on CF (to 59 +/- 1%) and LVSP (to 44 +/- 2%), without altering its potency. A similar enhancement was observed in the presence of nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester HCl (L-NAME; n = 4). On top of L-NAME, PD123319 no longer affected the response to Ang II (n = 4). The AT(2) receptor agonist CGP42112A (n = 4) did not affect CF or LVSP, nor did CGP42112A (n = 4) alter the constrictor response to the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine. Furthermore, Ang II exerted no effects in hearts of AT(1A)(-/-) mice (n = 5), whereas its effects in hearts of AT(1A)(+/+) wild-type control mice (n = 7) were indistinguishable from those in hearts of C57BL/6 mice. In conclusion, Ang II exerts opposite effects on coronary and cardiac contractility in the mouse heart via activation of AT(1A) and AT(2) receptors. AT(2) receptor-mediated effects depend on NO and occur only in conjunction with AT(1A) receptor activation.

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor- and acetylcholine-mediated relaxation: essential contribution of female sex hormones and chromosomes.

Angiotensin-induced vasodilation, involving type 2 receptor (AT2R)-induced generation of nitric oxide (NO; by endothelial NO synthase) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors, may be limited to women. To distinguish the contribution of female sex hormones and chromosomes to AT2R function and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated vasodilation, we made use of the four-core genotype model, where the testis-determining Sry gene has been deleted (Y(-)) from the Y chromosome, allowing XY(-) mice to develop a female gonadal phenotype. Simultaneously, by incorporating the Sry gene onto an autosome, XY(-)Sry and XXSry transgenic mice develop into gonadal male mice. Four-core genotype mice underwent a sham or gonadectomy (GDX) operation, and after 8 weeks, iliac arteries were collected to assess vascular function. XY(-)Sry male mice responded more strongly to angiotensin than XX female mice, and the AT2R antagonist PD123319 revealed that this was because of a dilator AT2R-mediated effect occurring exclusively in XX female mice. The latter could not be demonstrated in XXSry male and XY(-) female mice nor in XX female mice after GDX, suggesting that it depends on both sex hormones and chromosomes. Indeed, treating C57bl/6 GDX male mice with estrogen could not restore angiotensin-mediated, AT2R-dependent relaxation. To block acetylcholine-induced relaxation of iliac arteries obtained from four-core genotype XX mice, both endothelial NO synthase and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor inhibition were required, whereas in four-core genotype XY animals, endothelial NO synthase inhibition alone was sufficient. These findings were independent of gonadal sex and unaltered after GDX. In conclusion, AT2R-induced relaxation requires both estrogen and the XX chromosome sex complement, whereas only the latter is required for endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors.

Hypertension during vascular endothelial growth factor inhibition: focus on nitric oxide, endothelin-1, and oxidative stress.

SIGNIFICANCE: Angiogenesis inhibition with humanized antibodies targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or orally active small tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting VEGF receptors has become an established treatment modality for various forms of cancer. A common side effect of angiogenesis inhibition is the development of sometimes severe hypertension, which simultaneously appears to be predictive for a favorable antitumor response. RECENT ADVANCES: Since VEGF increases the expression and activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, it has been assumed that the mean blood pressure (MAP) rise during angiogenesis inhibition is caused by a decrease in nitric oxide bioavailability. Yet, the results from experimental and clinical studies exploring this possibility are conflicting. Recent studies provided evidence that the MAP rise during angiogenesis inhibition rather is mediated by activation of the endothelin-1 (ET-1) axis, which, among others, induces oxidative stress. Nevertheless, conclusive evidence for the involvement of reactive oxygen species in the MAP rise could not be obtained so far. CRITICAL ISSUES: The mechanism underlying activation of the ET-1 axis during angiogenesis inhibition is unclear, and this activation was not anticipated in view of studies showing that VEGF stimulates both the expression and production of ET-1 by endothelial cells. FUTURE DIRECTIONS: In fact, this activation of the ET-1 axis may support the use of ET receptor antagonists for the treatment of angiogenesis inhibition-induced hypertension, especially because ET receptor stimulation in vascular smooth muscle cells results in VEGF production and mitogenesis in a mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway-dependent manner.

Treatment of hypertension and renal injury induced by the angiogenesis inhibitor sunitinib: preclinical study.

Common adverse effects of angiogenesis inhibition are hypertension and renal injury. To determine the most optimal way to prevent these adverse effects and to explore their interdependency, the following drugs were investigated in unrestrained Wistar Kyoto rats exposed to the angiogenesis inhibitor sunitinib: the dual endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan; the calcium channel blocker amlodipine; the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril; and the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor sildenafil. Mean arterial pressure was monitored telemetrically. After 8 days, rats were euthanized and blood samples and kidneys were collected. In addition, 24-hour urine samples were collected. After sunitinib start, mean arterial pressure increased rapidly by ≈30 mm Hg. Coadministration of macitentan or amlodipine largely prevented this rise, whereas captopril or sildenafil did not. Macitentan, captopril, and sildenafil diminished the sunitinib-induced proteinuria and endothelinuria and glomerular intraepithelial protein deposition, whereas amlodipine did not. Changes in proteinuria and endothelinuria were unrelated. We conclude that in our experimental model, dual endothelin receptor antagonism and calcium channel blockade are suitable to prevent angiogenesis inhibition-induced hypertension, whereas dual endothelin receptor antagonism, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition can prevent angiogenesis inhibition-induced proteinuria. Moreover, the variable response of hypertension and renal injury to different antihypertensive agents suggests that these side effects are, at least in part, unrelated.

Mechanism of hypertension and proteinuria during angiogenesis inhibition: evolving role of endothelin-1.

Angiogenesis inhibition by blocking vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated signalling with monoclonal antibodies or tyrosine kinase inhibitors has become an established treatment of various forms of cancer. This treatment is frequently associated with the development of hypertension and proteinuria. As VEGF increases the expression and the activity of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells, a decrease in the bioavailability of nitric oxide has been proposed as a key mechanism leading to hypertension during angiogenesis inhibition. However, results of clinical and experimental studies exploring this possibility are conflicting. Rarefaction, that is a structural decrease of microcirculatory vessels, has been reported during antiangiogenic treatment, but evidence that it plays a role in development of hypertension is lacking. Elevated circulating and urinary levels of endothelin-1 have been observed in clinical and experimental studies with angiogenesis inhibitors. Furthermore, the observation that endothelin receptor blockers can prevent or revert the rise in blood pressure during angiogenesis inhibition and attenuate proteinuria provides strong evidence that an activated endothelin-signalling pathway is a final common mediator of angiogenesis inhibition-induced rise in blood pressure and renal toxicity.

The (pro)renin receptor blocker handle region peptide upregulates endothelium-derived contractile factors in aliskiren-treated diabetic transgenic (mREN2)27 rats.

BACKGROUND: Elevated prorenin levels associate with microvascular complications in patients with diabetes mellitus, possibly because prorenin affects vascular function in diabetes mellitus, for example by generating angiotensins following its binding to the (pro)renin receptor [(P)RR]. Here we evaluated whether the renin inhibitor aliskiren, with or without the putative (P)RR antagonist handle region peptide (HRP) improved the disturbed vascular function in diabetic TGR(mREN2)27 rats, a high-prorenin, high-(P)RR hypertensive model. METHODS: Telemetry transmitters were implanted to monitor blood pressure. After 3 weeks of treatment, rats were sacrificed, and iliac and mesenteric arteries were removed to evaluate vascular reactivity. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus enhanced the contractile response to nitric oxide synthase (NOS) blockade, potentiated the response to phenylephrine, diminished the effectiveness of endothelin type A (ETA) receptor blockade and allowed acetylcholine to display constrictor, cyclo-oxygenase-2 mediated, endothelium-dependent responses in the presence of NOS inhibition and blockers of endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factors. Aliskiren normalized blood pressure, suppressed renin activity, and reversed the above vascular effects, with the exception of the altered effectiveness of ETA receptor blockade. Remarkably, when adding HRP on top of aliskiren, its beneficial vascular effects either disappeared or were greatly diminished, although HRP did not alter the effect of aliskiren on blood pressure and renin activity. CONCLUSIONS: Renin inhibition improves vascular dysfunction in diabetic hypertensive rats, and HRP counteracts this effect independently of blood pressure and angiotensin. (P)RR blockade therefore is unlikely to be a new tool to further suppress the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) on top of existing RAS blockers.

Angiotensin II type 2 receptor agonists: where should they be applied?

INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin II, the active endproduct of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), exerts its effects via angiotensin II type 1 and type 2 (AT(1), AT(2)) receptors. AT(1) receptors mediate all well-known effects of angiotensin II, ranging from vasoconstriction to tissue remodeling. Thus, to treat cardiovascular disease, RAS blockade aims at preventing angiotensin II-AT(1) receptor interaction. Yet RAS blockade is often accompanied by rises in angiotensin II, which may exert beneficial effects via AT(2) receptors. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes our current knowledge on AT(2) receptors, describing their location, function(s), endogenous agonist(s) and intracellular signaling cascades. It discusses the beneficial effects obtained with C21, a recently developed AT(2) receptor agonist. Important questions that are addressed are do these receptors truly antagonize AT(1) receptor-mediated effects? What about their role in the diseased state and their heterodimerization with other receptors? EXPERT OPINION: The general view that AT(2) receptors exclusively exert beneficial effects has been challenged, and in pathological models, their function sometimes mimics that of AT(1) receptors, for example, inducing vasoconstriction and cardiac hypertrophy. Yet given its upregulation in various pathological conditions, the AT(2) receptor remains a promising target for treatment, allowing effects beyond blood pressure-lowering, for example, in stroke, aneurysm formation, inflammation and myocardial fibrosis.

Compound 21 induces vasorelaxation via an endothelium- and angiotensin II type 2 receptor-independent mechanism.

Angiotensin II type 2 (AT(2)) receptor stimulation has been linked to vasodilation. Yet, AT(2) receptor-independent hypertension and hypotension (or no effect on blood pressure) have been observed in vivo after application of the AT(2) receptor agonist compound 21 (C21). We, therefore, studied its effects in vitro, using preparations known to display AT(2) receptor-mediated responses. Hearts of Wistar rats, spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), C57Bl/6 mice, and AT(2) receptor knockout mice were perfused according to Langendorff. Mesenteric and iliac arteries of these animals, as well as coronary microarteries from human donor hearts, were mounted in Mulvany myographs. In the coronary vascular bed of Wistar rats, C57Bl/6 mice, and AT(2) receptor knockout mice, C21 induced constriction followed by dilation. SHR hearts displayed enhanced constriction and no dilation. Irbesartan (angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker) abolished the constriction and enhanced or (in SHRs) reintroduced dilation, and PD123319 (AT(2) receptor blocker) did not block the latter. C21 relaxed preconstricted vessels of all species, and this did not depend on angiotensin II receptors, the endothelium, or the NO-guanylyl cyclase-cGMP pathway. C21 constricted SHR iliac arteries but none of the other vessels, and irbesartan prevented this. C21 shifted the concentration-response curves to U46619 (thromboxane A(2) analog) and phenylephrine (α-adrenoceptor agonist) but not ionomycine (calcium ionophore) to the right. In conclusion, C21 did not cause AT(2) receptor-mediated vasodilation. Yet, it did induce vasodilation by blocking calcium transport into the cell and constriction via angiotensin II type 1 receptor stimulation. The latter effect is enhanced in SHRs. These data may explain the varying effects of C21 on blood pressure in vivo.

Handle region peptide counteracts the beneficial effects of the Renin inhibitor aliskiren in spontaneously hypertensive rats.

To investigate whether the putative (pro)renin receptor blocker, the handle region peptide (HRP), exerts effects on top of the blood pressure-lowering and cardioprotective effects of the renin inhibitor aliskiren, spontaneously hypertensive rats were implanted with telemetry transmitters to monitor heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP). After a 2-week recovery period, vehicle, aliskiren, HRP (100 and 1 mg/kg per day, respectively), and HRP+aliskiren were infused for 3 weeks using osmotic minipumps. Subsequently, the heart was removed to study coronary function according to Langendorff. Baseline MAP and heart rate in vehicle-treated rats were 146±3 mm Hg and 326±4 bpm. HRP did not affect MAP, whereas aliskiren and HRP+aliskiren lowered MAP (by maximally 29±2 and 20±1 mm Hg, respectively) without affecting heart rate. Aliskiren significantly reduced MAP throughout the 3-week infusion period, whereas the blood pressure-lowering effect of HRP+aliskiren returned to baseline within 2 weeks of treatment. In comparison with vehicle, aliskiren increased the endothelium-dependent response to bradykinin and decreased the response to angiotensin II in the coronary circulation, whereas these responses were not altered after treatment with HRP or HRP+aliskiren. HRP did not alter plasma renin activity, plasma angiotensin levels, or the renal angiotensin content, either alone or on top of aliskiren, nor did it alter the aliskiren-induced decrease in renal Ang II type 1 receptor expression. Yet, it did reverse the aliskiren-induced reduction in cardiomyocyte area, without affecting this area when given alone. In conclusion, HRP counteracts the beneficial effects of aliskiren on blood pressure, coronary function, and cardiac hypertrophy in an angiotensin-independent manner.

The role of the renin-angiotensin system in thoracic aortic aneurysms: clinical implications.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) are a potential life-threatening disease with limited pharmacological treatment options. Current treatment options are aimed at lowering aortic hemodynamic stress, predominantly with ß-adrenoceptor blockers. Increasing evidence supports a role for the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in aneurysm development. RAS blockade would not only lower blood pressure, but might also target the molecular pathways involved in aneurysm formation, in particular the transforming growth factor-ß and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 pathways. Indeed, the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor blocker losartan was effective in lowering aortic root growth in mice and patients with Marfan's syndrome. RAS inhibition (currently possible at 3 levels, i.e. renin, ACE and the AT1 receptor) is always accompanied by a rise in renin due to interference with the negative feedback loop between renin and angiotensin II. Only during AT1 receptor blockade will this result in stimulation of the non-blocked angiotensin II type 2 (AT2) receptor. This review summarizes the clinical aspects of TAAs, provides an overview of the current mouse models for TAAs, and focuses on the RAS as a new target for TAA treatment, discussing in particular the possibility that AT2 receptor stimulation might be crucial in this regard. If true, this would imply that AT1 receptor blockers (and not ACE inhibitors or renin inhibitors) should be the preferred treatment option for TAAs.

The vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor sunitinib causes a preeclampsia-like syndrome with activation of the endothelin system.

Angiogenesis inhibition is an established treatment for several tumor types. Unfortunately, this therapy is associated with adverse effects, including hypertension and renal toxicity, referred to as "preeclampsia." Recently, we demonstrated in patients and in rats that the multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor sunitinib induces a rise in blood pressure (BP), renal dysfunction, and proteinuria associated with activation of the endothelin system. In the current study we investigated the effects of sunitinib on rat renal histology, including the resemblance with preeclampsia, as well as the roles of endothelin 1, decreased nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability, and increased oxidative stress in the development of sunitinib-induced hypertension and renal toxicity. In rats on sunitinib, light and electron microscopic examination revealed marked glomerular endotheliosis, a characteristic histological feature of preeclampsia, which was partly reversible after sunitinib discontinuation. The histological abnormalities were accompanied by an increase in urinary excretion of endothelin 1 and diminished NO metabolite excretion. In rats on sunitinib alone, BP increased (ΔBP: 31.6±0.9 mm Hg). This rise could largely be prevented with the endothelin receptor antagonist macitentan (ΔBP: 12.3±1.5 mm Hg) and only mildly with Tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic (ΔBP: 25.9±2.3 mm Hg). Both compounds could not prevent the sunitinib-induced rise in serum creatinine or renal histological abnormalities and had no effect on urine nitrates but decreased proteinuria and urinary endothelin 1 excretion. Our findings indicate that both the endothelin system and oxidative stress play important roles in the development of sunitinib-induced proteinuria and that the endothelin system rather than oxidative stress is important for the development of sunitinib-induced hypertension.