An abnormal screening mammogram causes more anxiety than a palpable lump in benign breast disease.

Being recalled for further diagnostic procedures after an abnormal screening mammogram (ASM) can evoke a high state anxiety with lowered quality of life (QoL). We examined whether these adverse psychological consequences are found in all women with benign breast disease (BBD) or are particular to women referred after ASM. In addition, the influence of the anxiety as a personality characteristic (trait anxiety) was studied. Between September 2002 and February 2010 we performed a prospective longitudinal study in six Dutch hospitals. Women referred after ASM or with a palpable lump in the breast (PL), who were subsequently diagnosed with BBD, were included. Before diagnosis (at referral) and during follow-up, questionnaires were completed examining trait anxiety (at referral), state anxiety, depressive symptoms (at referral, one, three and 6 months after diagnosis), and QoL (at referral and 12 months). Women referred after ASM (N=363) were compared with women with PL (N=401). A similar state anxiety score was found in both groups, but a lower psychological QoL score at 12 months was seen in the ASM group. In women with not-high trait anxiety those in the ASM group were more anxious with more depressive symptoms at referral, and reported impaired psychological QoL at referral and at 12 months compared with the PL group. No differences were found between ASM and PL in women with high trait anxiety, but this group scored unfavorably on anxiety, depressive symptoms and QoL compared with women with not-high trait anxiety. ASM evokes more anxiety and depressive symptoms and lowered QoL compared with women referred with PL, especially in women who are not prone to anxiety. Women should be fully informed properly about the risks and benefits of breast cancer screening programs. We recommend identifying women at risk of reduced QoL using a psychometric test.

[Evaluation of the rate of autopsy and rate of disparity between autopsy results and clinical cause of death in a surgical ward, with the emphasis on necrological review]. / Een onderzoek naar het percentage obducties en naar discrepanties tussen obductiebevindingen en klinische doodsoorzaak op een heelkundige afdeling met extra aandacht voor necrologiebesprekingen.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of autopsy and the rate of disparity between autopsy results and the clinically determined cause of death in a surgical ward. DESIGN: Descriptive. METHOD: A total of 12,000 patients were admitted to the surgical ward of the Red Cross Hospital, the Hague, the Netherlands, from January 1999 to December 2002. 305 (3%) died during their stay on the ward. By using our standard mortality registration system, it was possible to classify the causes of death, evaluate shortcomings in treatment, and determine the extent of agreement between pre- and post-mortem findings. RESULTS: Permission for an autopsy was obtained for 136 patients (45%). The autopsy rates in patients who died following abdominal aortic surgery, colonic surgery, peripheral artery bypass surgery, and hip surgery were 55%, 63%, 35% and 30%, respectively. In 37 patients (27%), the autopsy report revealed a disparity with the clinical cause of death. Patients who died after abdominal aortic surgery or colonic surgery had disparity rates of 33% and 21%, respectively. Patients who died after peripheral artery bypass surgery or hip surgery had disparity rates of 13% and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of autopsy was lower (45%) than in the period 1992-1998 (60%), but remained relatively high in patient groups who were previously found to have a high rate of disparity between pre- and post-mortem findings. Post-mortem examination remains an important tool that can be used to verify diagnosis and treatment and therefore assess the quality of care.