Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
COPD ; 16(2): 152-159, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31117850

RESUMO

Although recently introduced in the pharmacological treatment algorithm of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is a need for more data supporting the use of blood eosinophil counts as a biomarker to guide inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of moderate and/or severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality in a large primary care population after withdrawal of ICS compared to continued users stratified by elevated blood eosinophil counts. In this population based cohort study, we used data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in the United Kingdom. We included subjects' aged 40 years or more who had a diagnosis of COPD. We excluded subjects with a history of asthma, pulmonary fibrosis, cardiac arrhythmia and bronchiectasis, COPD exacerbations occurring within 6 weeks prior to index date, or with a myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to index date. Continuous users were subjects who received their most recent ICS prescription within 3 months before the start of an interval. ICS withdrawals were those who discontinued ICS for more than 3 months. We evaluated the risk of moderate and/or severe exacerbations and all-cause mortality among subjects with various blood eosinophil thresholds who withdrew from ICS compared to continuous ICS users with elevated blood eosinophil levels using Cox regression analysis adjusted for potential confounders. We identified 48,157 subjects diagnosed with COPD between 1 January 2005 to 31 January 2014. Withdrawal of ICS was not associated with an increased risk of moderate-to-severe exacerbations among subjects with absolute blood eosinophil counts ≥0.34 × 109 cells/L [adjusted hazard ratio (adj. HR) 0.72; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.81] or relative counts ≥ 4.0% (adj. HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.66-0.78). Similarly, withdrawal of ICS was not associated with an increased risk of severe exacerbations among subjects with absolute blood eosinophil ≥0.34 × 109 cells/L (adj. HR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.61-1.10) or relative blood eosinophil counts ≥4.0% (adj. HR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.61-1.04). No increased risk of all-cause mortality was observed among subjects who withdrew from ICS irrespective of elevated absolute or relative blood eosinophil counts. In a real-world primary care population, we did not observe an increased risk of moderate and/or severe COPD exacerbations or all-cause mortality among subjects with eosinophilia who withdrew their use of ICS.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Eosinófilos/metabolismo , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Suspensão de Tratamento , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores/sangue , Bases de Dados Factuais , Progressão da Doença , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/sangue , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
2.
Handb Clin Neurol ; 165: 285-307, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31727218

RESUMO

The clinical presentations of autoimmune encephalitides tend to be a mixture of neuropsychiatric and somatic symptoms. The focus of this chapter concerns these clinical problems: the clinical phenomenology, the prevalence, and the possible pathophysiologies of anti-NMDAR or the other types of autoimmune encephalitis. We also specifically address the psychopharmacologic and nonpsychopharmacologic treatments. Our main questions are: What are the most used and best justified drug treatments? What are the most frequent side effects? And which other treatment options, such as ECT, are available? We discuss the main findings, present limitations, and we conclude by giving recommendations and presenting two algorithms.


Assuntos
Encefalite Antirreceptor de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/psicologia , Encefalite Antirreceptor de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/terapia , Encefalite/psicologia , Encefalite/terapia , Doença de Hashimoto/psicologia , Doença de Hashimoto/terapia , Encefalite Antirreceptor de N-Metil-D-Aspartato/diagnóstico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Eletroconvulsoterapia/métodos , Encefalite/diagnóstico , Doença de Hashimoto/diagnóstico , Humanos , Relações Interprofissionais , Psicofarmacologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Transtornos Psicóticos/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA