Hemodynamic Parameters in the Parent Arteries of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Depend on Aneurysm Size and Are Different Compared to Contralateral Arteries: A 7 Tesla 4D Flow MRI Study.

BACKGROUND: Different Circle of Willis (CoW) variants have variable prevalences of aneurysm development, but the hemodynamic variation along the CoW and its relation to presence and size of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are not well known. PURPOSE: Gain insight into hemodynamic imaging markers of the CoW for UIA development by comparing these outcomes to the corresponding contralateral artery without an UIA using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY TYPE: Retrospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Thirty-eight patients with an UIA, whereby 27 were women and a mean age of 62 years old. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Four-dimensional phase-contrast (PC) MRI with a 3D time-resolved velocity encoded gradient echo sequence at 7 T. ASSESSMENT: Hemodynamic parameters (blood flow, velocity pulsatility index [vPI], mean velocity, distensibility, and wall shear stress [peak systolic (WSSMAX ), and time-averaged (WSSMEAN )]) in the parent artery of the UIA were compared to the corresponding contralateral artery without an UIA and were related to UIA size. STATISTICAL TESTS: Paired t-tests and Pearson Correlation tests. The threshold for statistical significance was P < 0.05 (two-tailed). RESULTS: Blood flow, mean velocity, WSSMAX , and WSSMEAN were significantly higher, while vPI was lower, in the parent artery relative to contralateral artery. The WSSMAX of the parent artery significantly increased linearly while the WSSMEAN decreased linearly with increasing UIA size. CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamic parameters and WSS differ between parent vessels of UIAs and corresponding contralateral vessels. WSS correlates with UIA size, supporting a potential hemodynamic role in aneurysm pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Clinical implications of different methods to assess left atrial remodeling: A comparative study between echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for left atrial volume index quantification.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial volume index (LAVI) serves as a crucial marker for assessing left atrial (LA) remodeling, particularly in patients with mitral valve regurgitation (MR). Recent guidelines recommend a LAVI exceeding 60 mL/m2 as Class IIa recommendation for mitral valve repair surgery in asymptomatic MR patients with preserved left ventricular function. Traditionally, echocardiography is the standard for assessing LAVI in MR patients. However, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is increasingly recognized for its more precise measurements of cardiac dimensions and volumes. But still, literature remains scarce on comparing the efficacy of both modalities in assessing LAVI measurements. METHODS: This retrospective study included 168 MR patients undergoing both echocardiography and CMR assessments within a six-month period. LAVI measurements were compared using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plots. Patients were stratified based on MR grades, and clinical implications were assessed. RESULTS: Mean LAVI differed significantly between echocardiography and CMR (47.1 ± 20.8 mL/m2 versus 70 ± 20.3 mL/m2, p < 0.001, respectively). CMR consistently yielded higher LAVI measurements compared to echocardiography, with a mean difference of approximately 20 mL/m2. CMR measurements resulted in an increased incidence of patients meeting the class IIa LAVI criterion (LAVI >60 mL/m2) by 37%. Variations in LAVI did not differ across MR grades. CONCLUSION: Echocardiography systematically underestimates LAVI compared to CMR in MR patients. While current guidelines rely on echocardiography, CMR's precision suggests the need for CMR-specific LAVI cutoff values to guide clinical management effectively. Establishing such values could refine patient stratification and timing of surgery, potentially improving clinical outcomes for MR patients.

Clinical impact of novel CMR technology on patients with congenital heart disease. A scientific statement of the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the ESC.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is recommended in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) in clinical practice guidelines as the imaging standard for a large variety of diseases. As CMR is evolving, novel techniques are becoming available. Some of them are already used clinically, whereas others still need further evaluation. In this statement the authors give an overview of relevant new CMR techniques for the assessment of CHD. Studies with reference values for these new techniques are listed in the supplement.