A randomized phase III trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for patients with up to 10 oligometastases and a synchronous primary tumor (SABR-SYNC): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Emerging randomized data, mostly from phase II trials, have suggested that patients with oligometastatic cancers may benefit from ablative treatments such as stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). However, phase III data testing this paradigm are lacking, and many studies have examined SABR in the setting of metachronous oligometastatic disease. The goal of the SABR-SYNC trial is to assess the effect of SABR in patients with oligometastatic cancers and a synchronous primary tumor. METHODS: One hundred and eighty patients will be randomized in a 1:2 ratio between standard of care (SOC) palliative-intent treatments vs. SOC + ablative therapy (SABR preferred) to all sites of known disease. Randomization will be stratified based on histology and number of metastases at enrollment. SABR may be delivered in 1-, 3- and 5-fraction regimens, with recommended doses of 20 Gy, 30 Gy, and 35 Gy, respectively. Non-SABR local modalities (e.g. surgery, thermal ablation, conventional radiation) may be used for treatment of the primary or metastases at the discretion of the treating physicians, if those modalities are clinically preferred. The primary endpoint is overall survival, and secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, time to development of new metastatic lesions, time to initiation of next systemic therapy, quality of life, and toxicity. Translational endpoints include assessment of circulating tumor DNA and immunological predictors of outcomes. DISCUSSION: SABR-SYNC will provide phase III data to assess the impact of SABR on overall survival in a population of patients with synchronous oligometastases. The translational component will attempt to identify novel prognostic and predictive biomarkers to aid in clinical decision making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05717166 (registration date: Feb. 8, 2023).

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Focal Ablative Therapy for Treatment of Localized Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Patients >70 Years: A Multi-institute, Multi-energy 15-Year Experience.

PURPOSE: In older patients who do not wish to undergo watchful waiting, focal therapy could be an alternative to the more morbid radical treatment. We evaluated the role of focal therapy in patients 70 years and older as an alternative management modality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 649 patients across 11 UK sites receiving focal high-intensity focused ultrasound or cryotherapy between June 2006 and July 2020 reported within the UK-based HEAT (HIFU Evaluation and Assessment of Treatment) and ICE (International Cryotherapy Evaluation) registries were evaluated. Primary outcome was failure-free survival, defined by need for more than 1 focal reablation, progression to radical treatment, development of metastases, need for systemic treatment, or prostate cancer-specific death. This was compared to the failure-free survival in patients undergoing radical treatment via a propensity score weighted analysis. RESULTS: Median age was 74 years (IQR: 72, 77) and median follow-up 24 months (IQR: 12, 41). Sixty percent had intermediate-risk disease and 35% high-risk disease. A total of 113 patients (17%) required further treatment. Sixteen had radical treatment and 44 required systemic treatment. Failure-free survival was 82% (95% CI: 76%-87%) at 5 years. Comparing patients who had radical therapy to those who had focal therapy, 5-year failure-free survival was 96% (95% CI: 93%-100%) and 82% (95% CI: 75%-91%) respectively (P < .001). Ninety-three percent of those in the radical treatment arm had received radiotherapy as their primary treatment with its associated use of androgen deprivation therapy, thereby leading to potential overestimation of treatment success in the radical treatment arm, especially given the similar metastases-free and overall survival rates seen. CONCLUSIONS: We propose focal therapy to be an effective management option for the older or comorbid patient who is unsuitable for or not willing to undergo radical treatment.

Feasibility and first results of the 'Trials-within-Cohorts' (TwiCs) design in patients undergoing radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Background: 'Trials-within-Cohorts' (TwiCs), previously known as 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trials' is a pragmatic trial design, supporting an efficient and representative recruitment of patients for (future) trials. To our knowledge, the 'COhort for Lung cancer Outcome Reporting and trial inclusion' (COLOR) is the first TwiCs in lung cancer patients. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility and first year results of COLOR.Material and Methods: All patients diagnosed with lung cancer referred to the Radiotherapy department were eligible to participate in the ongoing prospective COLOR study. At inclusion, written informed consent was requested for use of patient data, participation in patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and willingness to participate in (future) trials. Feasibility was studied by assessing participation and comparing baseline PROs to EORTC reference values. First-year results of PROs at baseline and 3 months after inclusion were evaluated separately for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and conventional radiotherapy patients.Results: Of the 338 eligible patients between July 2020 and July 2021, 169 (50%) participated. Among these, 127 (75%) gave informed consent to PROs participation and 110 (65%) were willing to participate in (future) trials. The inclusion percentage dropped from 77% to 33% when the information procedure was switched from in-person to by phone (due to COVID-19 pandemic measures). Baseline PROs for physical and cognitive functioning were comparable in COLOR patients compared to the EORTC reference values. No significant changes in PROs were observed 3 months after inclusion, except for a slight increase in pain scores in the SBRT group (n = 97).Conclusions: The TwiCs-design appears feasible in lung cancer patients with fair participation rates (although negatively impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic). With a planned expansion to other centers, the COLOR-study is expected to enable multiple (randomized) evaluations of experimental interventions with important advantages for recruitment, generalizability, and long-term outcome data collection.

Long-term health-related quality of life in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer receiving first-line systemic therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of systemic therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer in daily clinical practice. This study assessed the HRQoL of patients with esophagogastric cancer during first-line systemic therapy, at disease progression, and after progression in a real-world context. METHODS: Patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (2014-2021) receiving first-line systemic therapy registered in the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Oesophageal-gastric cancer (POCOP) were included (n = 335). HRQoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25. Outcomes of mixed-effects models were presented as adjusted mean changes. RESULTS: Results of the mixed-effect models showed the largest significant improvements during systemic therapy for odynophagia (- 18.9, p < 0.001), anxiety (- 18.7, p < 0.001), and dysphagia (- 13.8, p < 0.001) compared to baseline. After progression, global health status (- 6.3, p = 0.002) and cognitive (- 6.2, p = 0.001) and social functioning (- 9.7, p < 0.001) significantly worsened. At and after progression, physical (- 9.0, p < 0.001 and - 8.8, p < 0.001) and role functioning (- 15.2, p = 0.003 and - 14.7, p < 0.001) worsened, respectively. Trouble with taste worsened during systemic therapy (11.5, p < 0.001), at progression (12.0, p = 0.004), and after progression (15.3, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In general, HRQoL outcomes in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer improved during first-line therapy. Deterioration in outcomes was mainly observed at and after progression. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Identification of HRQoL aspects is important in shared decision-making and to inform patients on the impact of systemic therapy on their HRQoL.

Metastasectomy or Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With or Without Systemic Therapy for Oligometastatic Esophagogastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The primary goal of this study was to determine overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent local treatment (metastasectomy or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]) or systemic therapy (chemotherapy or targeted therapy) for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer. The secondary goal was to determine prognostic factors for OS. METHODS: Patients with synchronous or metachronous oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer who underwent local treatment or systemic therapy were included in this single-center, retrospective cohort study. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) included 1 organ or 1 extraregional lymph node station with ≤ 3 lesions. OS was determined after OMD detection. Treatment for OMD was categorized as (1) local treatment, (2) local plus systemic, (3) systemic therapy. The primary tumor was controlled after resection or definitive chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: In total, 85 patients were included. Treatment for OMD was local treatment (58%), local plus systemic (14%), or systemic therapy (28%). The primary tumor was controlled in 68% of patients. Most patients were diagnosed with distal esophageal cancer (61%), with adenocarcinoma histology (76%), and presented with synchronous OMD (51%). OS after local treatment was 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 12-40), after local plus systemic therapy 35 months (95% CI 29-NA), and after systemic therapy 16 months (95% CI 11-NA). Better OS was independently associated with local plus systemic compared with local treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 2.11, 95% CI 1.05-5.07) or systemic therapy (HR 2.28, 95% CI 1.04-6.07). CONCLUSIONS: Local plus systemic therapy for oligometastatic esophagogastric cancer was independently associated with improved OS and better OS compared with either systemic therapy or local treatment.

Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with a High Predicted Risk of Irradical Resection: Can Chemoradiotherapy Offer Similar Survival?

PURPOSE: Irradical resection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a detrimental prognostic factor. Recently, Rasing et al. presented an internationally validated risk score for pre-treatment prediction of irradical resection. We hypothesized that chemoradiation therapy (CRT) could serve as an alternative approach in patients with a high risk score and compared overall survival (OS) outcomes between surgery and CRT. METHODS: Patients from a population-based cohort with stage IIB-III NSCLC between 2015 and 2018 in The Netherlands were selected. Patients with a 'Rasing score' > 4 who underwent surgery were matched with patients who underwent CRT using 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching. The primary endpoint of OS was compared using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: In total, 2582 CRT and 638 surgery patients were eligible. After matching, 523 well-balanced pairs remained. Median OS in the CRT group was 27.5 months, compared with 45.6 months in the surgery group (HR 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.70, p < 0.001). The 114 surgical patients who underwent an R1-2 resection (21.8%) had a worse median OS than the CRT group (20.2 versus 27.5 months, HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.99, p = 0.039). CONCLUSION: In NSCLC patients at high predicted risk of irradical resection, CRT appears to yield inferior survival compared with surgery. Therefore, choosing CRT instead of surgery cannot solely be based on the Rasing score. Since patients receiving an R1-2 resection do have detrimental outcomes compared with primary CRT, the treatment decision should be based on additional information, such as imaging features, comorbidities, patient preference, and the surgeon's confidence in achieving an R0 resection.

Upstaging by para-aortic lymph node dissection in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Accurate staging of para-aortic nodal status in cervical cancer is of great importance for individualizing treatment and impacting outcomes. Three-dimensional imaging (i.e. PET, CT, MRI) may miss para-aortic lymph node (PALN) metastases. The aim of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze the proportion of upstaging by PALN dissection in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer without suspicious PALNs on imaging. METHODS: PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase were systematically searched. The analysis included diagnostic studies that reported on 3D imaging and pre-therapeutic surgical assessment of PALN status in patients with cervical cancer. An overall pooled upstaging rate was calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The search identified 16 eligible studies including 18 cohorts with a total of 1530 patients. Pooling of 12 cohorts demonstrated an upstaging rate of 12% (95% confidence interval [CI] 10-15%) by PALN dissection after negative PET or PET-CT. Pooling of 6 cohorts demonstrated a pooled upstaging rate of 11% (95% CI: 8-16%) by PALN dissection after negative MRI or CT. No significant heterogeneity in upstaging proportions across cohorts was observed (I2 = 0% and 27%, respectively). In 7 cohorts including only patients with pelvic nodal metastases on imaging (but no suspicion of PALN involvement) a pooled upstaging rate by PALN dissection of 21% (95% CI: 17-26%) was found (I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrates that in case of no suspicious PALN on PET-CT or MRI, PALN dissection still identifies lymph node metastases in a considerable amount of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer and especially in those patients with confirmed pelvic nodal metastases.

Prognostic impact of waiting time between diagnosis and treatment in patients with cervical cancer: A nationwide population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Prior research underlined the importance of timely oncological care as longer waiting times from diagnosis to treatment may result in poorer survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of waiting time from diagnosis to treatment on overall survival (OS) in patients with cervical cancer treated with curative intent. METHODS: Patients from a nationwide population-based cohort with newly diagnosed cervical cancer between 2010 and 2019 were studied. Patients who underwent surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy with curative intent were selected. Waiting time (i.e. interval between first pathologic confirmation and treatment) was modelled as continuous (i.e. linear per week), dichotomized (i.e. ≤8 versus >8 weeks), and polynomial (i.e. restricted cubic splines). The association with OS was examined using Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Among 6895 patients with cervical cancer, 2755 treated with primary surgery and 1898 who received primary (chemo)radiotherapy were included. Mean waiting time was 8.5 (±4.2) weeks to surgery and 7.7 (±2.9) weeks to (chemo)radiotherapy. Adjusted for confounders, waiting time to surgery was not significantly associated with OS (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.01], dichotomized HR 0.93 [95%CI: 0.68-1.27], polynomial HR not significant). Similarly, a longer waiting time to (chemo)radiotherapy was not significantly associated with poorer OS (continuous HR 0.97 [95%CI: 0.93-1.00], dichotomized HR 0.91 [95%CI: 0.75-1.09], polynomial HR not significant). CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based study demonstrates that a longer waiting time (of up to 12 weeks) from diagnosis to treatment in patients with cervical cancer treated with curatively intended surgery or (chemo)radiotherapy does not negatively impact survival.

A Comparison of Prostate Cancer Detection between Visual Estimation (Cognitive Registration) and Image Fusion (Software Registration) Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

PURPOSE: We compared clinically significant prostate cancer detection by visual estimation and image fusion targeted transperineal prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This multicenter study included patients with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging lesions undergoing visual estimation or image fusion targeted transperineal biopsy (April 2017-March 2020). Propensity score matching was performed using demographics (age and ethnicity), clinical features (prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, prostate specific antigen density and digital rectal examination), multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging variables (number of lesions, PI-RADS® score, index lesion diameter, whether the lesion was diffuse and radiological T stage) and biopsy factors (number of cores, operator experience and anesthetic type). Matched groups were compared overall and by operator grade, PI-RADS score, lesion multiplicity, prostate volume and anesthetic type using targeted-only and targeted plus systematic histology. Multiple clinically significant prostate cancer thresholds were evaluated (primary: Gleason ≥3+4). RESULTS: A total of 1,071 patients with a median age of 67.3 years (IQR 61.3-72.4), median prostate specific antigen of 7.5 ng/ml (IQR 5.3-11.2) and 1,430 total lesions underwent targeted-only biopsies (visual estimation: 372 patients, 494 lesions; image fusion: 699 patients, 936 lesions). A total of 770 patients with a median age of 67.4 years (IQR 61-72.1), median prostate specific antigen of 7.1 ng/ml (IQR 5.2-10.6) and 919 total lesions underwent targeted plus systematic biopsies (visual estimation: 271 patients, 322 lesions; image fusion: 499 patients, 597 lesions). Matched comparisons demonstrated no overall difference in clinically significant prostate cancer detection between visual estimation and image fusion (primary: targeted-only 54% vs 57.4%, p=0.302; targeted plus systematic 51.2% vs 58.2%, p=0.123). Senior urologists had significantly higher detection rates using image fusion (primary: targeted-only 45.4% vs 63.7%, p=0.001; targeted plus systematic 39.4% vs 64.5%, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found no overall difference in clinically significant prostate cancer detection, although image fusion may be superior in experienced hands.

Ultra-central lung tumors: safety and efficacy of protracted stereotactic body radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: For patients with early stage or medically inoperable lung cancer, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a general accepted and effective treatment option. The role of SBRT in ultra-central tumors remains controversial. The aim of this single-center retrospective analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protracted SBRT with 60 Gy in 12 fractions (with a biological effective dose (BED10) of 90-150 Gy) for patients with ultra-central lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with ultra-central lung tumors treated in our institution with 60 Gy in 12 fractions from January 2012 until April 2020 were included. Ultra-central tumors were defined as planning target volume (PTV) abutting or overlapping the main bronchi and/or trachea and/or esophagus. Data regarding patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 72 patients met the criteria for ultra-central tumor location. The PTV abutted the main bronchus, trachea or esophagus in 79%, 22% and 28% of cases, respectively. At a median follow-up of 19 months, 1- and 2-year local control rates were 98% and 85%, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 77% and 52%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 21%, of which 10 patients (14% of total) died of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage. A significant difference between patients with or without grade ≥3 toxicity was found for the mean dose (Dmean) to the main bronchus (p = 0.003), where a Dmean BED3 of ≥91 Gy increased the risk of grade ≥3 toxicity significantly. DISCUSSION: A protracted SBRT regimen of 60 Gy in 12 fractions for ultra-central lung tumors leads to high local control rates with toxicity rates similar to previous series, but with substantial risk of fatal bronchopulmonary hemorrhage. Therefore, possible risk factors of bronchopulmonary hemorrhage such as dose to the main bronchus should be taken into account.

Optimal timing for prediction of pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted in order to determine the optimal timing of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for esophageal cancer. METHODS: Patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma who planned to undergo nCRT followed by surgery were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients underwent six DW-MRI scans: one baseline scan before the start of nCRT and weekly scans during 5 weeks of nCRT. Relative changes in mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values between the baseline scans and the scans during nCRT (ΔADC(%)) were compared between pathologic complete responders (pCR) and non-pCR (tumor regression grades 2-5). The discriminative ability of ΔADC(%) was determined based on the c-statistic. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients with 142 DW-MRI scans were included. pCR was observed in seven patients (29%). ΔADC(%) from baseline to week 2 was significantly higher in patients with pCR versus non-pCR (median [IQR], 36% [30%, 41%] for pCR versus 16% [14%, 29%] for non-pCR, p = 0.004). The ΔADC(%) of the second week in combination with histology resulted in the highest c-statistic for the prediction of pCR versus non-pCR (0.87). The c-statistic of this model increased to 0.97 after additional exclusion of patients with a small tumor volume (< 7 mL, n = 3) and tumor histology of the resection specimen other than adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (n = 1). CONCLUSION: The relative change in tumor ADC (ΔADC(%)) during the first 2 weeks of nCRT is the most predictive for pathologic complete response to nCRT in esophageal cancer patients. KEY POINTS: • DW-MRI during the second week of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is most predictive for pathologic complete response in esophageal cancer. • A model including ΔADCweek 2was able to discriminate between pathologic complete responders and non-pathologic complete responders in 87%. • Improvements in future MRI studies for esophageal cancer may be obtained by incorporating motion management techniques.

Factors associated with spontaneous stone passage in a contemporary cohort of patients presenting with acute ureteric colic: results from the Multi-centre cohort study evaluating the role of Inflammatory Markers In patients presenting with acute ureteric Colic (MIMIC) study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship of white blood cell count (WBC) and other routinely collected inflammatory and clinical markers including stone size, stone position, and medical expulsive therapy use (MET), with spontaneous stone passage (SSP) in a large contemporary cohort of patients with acute ureteric colic, as there are conflicting data on the role of WBC and other inflammatory markers in SSP in patients with acute ureteric colic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Multicentre retrospective cohort study coordinated by the British Urology Researchers in Surgical Training (BURST) Research Collaborative at 71 secondary care hospitals across four countries (UK, Republic of Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand). In all, 4170 patients presented with acute ureteric colic and a computed tomography confirmed single ureteric stone. Our primary outcome measure was SSP, as defined by the absence of need for intervention to assist stone passage (SP). Multivariable mixed effects logistic regression was used to explore the relationship between key patient factors and SSP. RESULTS: In all, 2518 patients were discharged with conservative management and had further follow-up with a SSP rate of 74% (n = 1874/2518). Sepsis after discharge with conservative management was reported in 0.6% (n = 16/2518). On multivariable analysis neither WBC, neutrophils count, nor C-reactive protein (CRP) predicted SSP, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.04, P = 0.38), 1.06 (95% CI 0.99-1.13, P = 0.1) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.00, P = 0.17), respectively. MET also did not predict SSP (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.76-1.61). However, stone size and stone position were significant predictors. SSP for stones <5 mm was 89% (95% CI 87-90) compared to 49% (95% CI 44-53) for stones ≥5-7 mm, and 29% (95% CI 23-36) for stones >7 mm. For stones in the upper ureter the SSP rate was 52% (95% CI 48-56), middle ureter was 70% (95% CI 64-76), and lower ureter was 83% (95% CI 81-85). CONCLUSION: In contrast to the previously published literature, we found that in patients with acute ureteric colic who are discharged with initial conservative management neither WBC, neutrophil count, nor CRP, helps determine the likelihood of SSP. We also found no overall benefit from the use of MET. Stone size and position are important predictors and our present findings represent the most comprehensive SP rates for each millimetre increase in stone size from a large contemporary cohort adjusting for key potential confounders. We anticipate that these data will aid clinicians managing patients with acute ureteric colic and help guide management decisions and the need for intervention.

Radiation dose and pathological response in oesophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery: a multi-institutional analysis.

Purpose: To explore whether a higher neoadjuvant radiation dose increases the probability of a pathological complete response (pCR) or pathological major response (pMR) response in oesophageal cancer patients. Material and methods: Between 2000 and 2017, 1048 patients from four institutions were stratified according to prescribed neoadjuvant radiation doses of 36.0 Gy (13.3%), 40.0 Gy (7.4%), 41.4 Gy (20.1%), 45.0 Gy (25.5%) or 50.4 Gy (33.7%) in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions. Endpoints were pCR (tumour regression grade (TRG) 1) and pMR (TRG 1 + 2). Multivariable binary (TRG 1 + 2 vs. TRG > 2) and ordinal (TRG 1 vs. TRG 2 vs. TRG > 2) logistic regression analyses were performed, with subgroup analyses according to histology (squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) vs. adenocarcinoma (AC)). Variables entered in the regression model along with neoadjuvant radiation dose were clinical tumour stage (cT), histology, chemotherapy regimen, induction chemotherapy and time from neoadjuvant chemoradiation to surgery. Results: A pCR was observed in 312 patients (29.8%); in 22.7% patients with AC and in 49.6% patients with SCC. No radiation dose-response relation was observed for pCR (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98-1.05 for AC and OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.96-1.10 for SCC). A pMR was observed in 597 patients (57.0%); in 53.4% patients with AC and in 67.2% patients with SCC. A higher radiation dose increased the probability of achieving pMR (OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.05). Factors reducing this probability were advanced cT stage (reference = cT1-2; cT3: OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.37-0.80; cT4: OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.24-0.84), AC histology (reference = SCC; OR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.44-0.88), the use of non-platinum based chemotherapy in SCC patients (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.10-0.91) and platinum based chemotherapy without induction chemotherapy in patients with AC (OR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.42-0.76). The radiation dose-response relation was confirmed in a subgroup analysis of histologic subtypes (OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04 for AC and OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08 for SCC). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant radiation dose impacts pathological response in terms of pMR in oesophageal cancer patients. No radiation dose-response effect was observed for pCR. Further prospective trials are needed to investigate the dose-response relation in terms of pCR.

Preoperative Nomogram to Risk Stratify Patients for the Benefit of Trimodality Therapy in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To develop a nomogram that estimates 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) after trimodality therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma and to assess the overall survival (OS) benefit of esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the basis of 1-year recurrence risk. METHODS: In total, 568 consecutive patients with potentially resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent CRT were included for analysis, including 373 patients who underwent esophagectomy after CRT (trimodality therapy), and 195 who did not undergo surgery (bimodality therapy). A nomogram for 1-year RFS was created using a Cox regression model. The upper tertile of the nomogram score was used to stratify patients in low-risk and high-risk groups for 1-year recurrence. The 5-year OS was compared between trimodality and bimodality therapy in low-risk and high-risk patients after propensity score matching, respectively. RESULTS: Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 62 months. The 5-year OS in the trimodality and bimodality treatment groups was 56.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.9-64.7) and 36.9% (95% CI 31.4-42.4), respectively. The final nomogram for the prediction of 1-year RFS included male gender, poor histologic grade, signet ring cell adenocarcinoma, cN1, cN2-3, and baseline SUVmax, with accurate calibration and reasonable discrimination (C-statistic: 0.66). Trimodality therapy was associated with improved 5-year OS in low-risk patients (p = 0.003), whereas it showed no significant survival benefit in high-risk patients (p = 0.302). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed nomogram estimates early recurrence risk. The addition of surgery to CRT provides a clear OS benefit in low-risk patients. The OS benefit of surgery in high-risk patients is less pronounced.

Cervical ultrasonography has no additional value over negative 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with oesophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the additional value of cervical ultrasonography over 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 163 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer underwent both cervical ultrasonography and 18F-FDG PET/CT at a tertiary referral centre in the Netherlands. Retrospective clinical data analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of cervical ultrasonography and 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases. Fine needle aspiration or clinical follow-up was used as reference standard. RESULTS: The overall incidence of patients with cervical lymph node metastases was 14%. The sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET/CT to detect cervical lymph node metastases was 82% (95% CI 59-94%) and specificity was 91% (95% CI 85-95%). The sensitivity and specificity of cervical ultrasonography were 73% (95% CI 50-88%) and 84% (95% CI 77-90%), respectively. In patients with a negative 18F-FDG PET/CT, 12 of 133 (9%) patients had suspicious nodes on cervical ultrasonography. In all these 12 patients the nodes were confirmed benign. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical ultrasonography has no additional diagnostic value to a negative integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of cervical lymph node metastases in patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal cancer. KEY POINTS: • Cervical ultrasonography has no value over PET/CT in evaluating cervical node metastases. • PET/CT provides greater diagnostic confidence compared to cervical ultrasonography. • Cervical ultrasonography during standard diagnostic work-up may be considered unnecessary. • Cervical lesions on PET/CT require cytopathological confirmation by FNA.

DW-MRI and DCE-MRI are of complementary value in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the potential benefit and complementary value of a multiparametric approach using diffusion-weighted (DW-) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE-) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients underwent both DW-MRI and DCE-MRI prior to nCRT (pre), during nCRT (week 2-3) (per) and after completion of nCRT, but prior to esophagectomy (post). Subsequently, histopathologic tumor regression grade (TRG) was assessed. Tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and area-under-the-concentration time curve (AUC) were calculated for DW-MRI and DCE-MRI, respectively. The ability of these parameters to predict pathologic complete response (pCR, TRG1) or good response (GR, TRG ≤ 2) to nCRT was assessed. Furthermore the complementary value of DW-MRI and DCE-MRI was investigated. RESULTS: GR was found in 22 (49%) patients, of which 10 (22%) patients showed pCR. For DW-MRI, the 75th percentile (P75) ΔADCpost-pre was most predictive for GR (c-index = 0.75). For DCE-MRI, P90 ΔAUCper-pre was most predictive for pCR (c-index = 0.79). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed complementary value when combining DW-MRI and DCE-MRI for pCR prediction (c-index = 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Both DW-MRI and DCE-MRI are promising in predicting response to nCRT in esophageal cancer. Combining both modalities provides complementary information, resulting in a higher predictive value.

Impact of Lymph Node Yield on Overall Survival in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Esophagectomy for Cancer: A Population-based Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of lymph node yield (LNY) on survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by esophagectomy for cancer. BACKGROUND: The value of an extended lymphadenectomy after nCRT for esophageal cancer is debated. Recent reports demonstrate no association between LNY and survival. This association has not yet been evaluated in larger cohorts. METHODS: All patients who underwent nCRT followed by esophagectomy between 2005 and 2014 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The association between LNY and overall survival was analyzed using multivariable Cox regression analyses, adjusting for diagnosis year, referral, hospital volume, age, sex, malignancy history, tumor location, histology, cTN-stage, surgical approach, radicality, and ypTN-stage. Analyses were performed with LNY as categorized predictor (<15 vs ≥15 nodes) and continuous predictor (per 10 additionally nodes). RESULTS: A total of 2698 patients were included with a median overall survival of 34 months (range 4-143). A higher LNY was significantly associated with improved overall survival, both as categorized predictor (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.86) and as continuous predictor (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.78-0.90). Furthermore, a higher LNY was associated with favorable hazard ratios across subgroups, including both squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma, both cN0 and cN+, both transthoracic and transhiatal approaches, and both ypN0 and ypN+. CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based cohort study demonstrates an association between LNY and overall survival, indicating a therapeutic value of extended lymphadenectomy during esophagectomy. Therefore, an extended lymphadenectomy should be the standard of care after nCRT.

Impact of Weekday of Esophagectomy on Short-term and Long-term Oncological Outcomes: A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether weekday of esophagectomy impacts 30-day mortality, and short- and long-term oncologic outcomes in esophageal cancer. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Recent literature suggests a relationship between the weekday of esophagectomy and overall survival. This finding could impact clinical practice, but has not yet been validated in other studies. METHODS: The Netherlands Cancer Registry database (2005-2013) identified all patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The impact of weekday on 30-day mortality, the total number of resected lymph nodes, and R0 resection rates was evaluated with multivariable logistic regression analyses and for overall survival with Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: In total, 3840 patients were included. Weekday was not significantly associated with 30-day mortality (P > 0.05), nor the total number of resected lymph nodes (P > 0.05), nor with R0 resection rates (P > 0.05). Also, weekday did not significantly influence overall survival using weekday as discrete variable [Monday-Friday, hazard ratio (HR) 0.98, P = 0.140), as 2 weekday categories (Wednesday-Friday vs Monday-Tuesday, HR 0.97, P = 0.434), or with separate weekday categories (Tuesday vs Monday, HR 0.99, P = 0.826; Wednesday vs Monday, HR 1.06, P = 0.430; Thursday vs Monday, HR 0.92, P = 0.206; Friday vs Monday, HR 0.91, P = 0.140). CONCLUSIONS: This large population-based cohort study in the Netherlands refutes the finding from a previous report that suggests that the weekday of esophagectomy in patients diagnosed with potentially curable esophageal cancer impacts overall survival. In addition, this study demonstrates that weekday of esophagectomy does not influence other outcomes including the 30-day mortality, total number of resected lymph nodes, and R0 resection rates.