Salvage vesiculectomy for local prostate cancer recurrence: surgical technique and early post-operative outcomes.

PURPOSE: Isolated recurrence in remnants of the seminal vesicles (SV) after treatment of primary prostate cancer (PCa) has become a more frequent entity with the widespread use of more sensitive next-generation imaging modalities. Salvage vesiculectomy is hypothesized to be a worthwhile management option in these patients. The primary goal of this study is to describe the surgical technique of this new treatment option. Secondary outcomes are peri- and post-operative complications and early oncological outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study, including 108 patients with solitary recurrence in the SV treated between January 2009 and June 2022, was performed. Patients with local recurrences outside the SVs or with metastatic disease were excluded. Both SVs were resected using a robot-assisted or an open approach. In selected cases, a concomitant lymphadenectomy was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 31 patients (29%) reported complications, all but one grade 1 to 3 on the Clavien-Dindo Scale. A median PSA decrease of 2.07 ng/ml (IQR: 0.80-4.33, p < 0.001), translating into a median PSA reduction of 92% (IQR: 59-98%) was observed. At a median follow-up of 14 months, freedom from secondary treatment was 54%. Lymphadenectomy had a significant influence on PSA reduction (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Salvage vesiculectomy for PCa recurrence limited to the SV is a safe procedure with excellent PSA response and is a potential curative treatment in a subset of patients. A concomitant lymphadenectomy can best be performed in all patients that did not underwent one at primary treatment.

Site-specific relapse patterns of patients with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy assessed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT or 11C-Choline PET/CT: impact of postoperative treatments.

BACKGROUND: Salvage radiotherapy (RT) (± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)) is often used as a treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Unfortunately, even after RT ± ADT, a significant number of patients will develop 'second' BCR. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative treatments (adjuvant/salvage radiotherapy (RT) ± androgen deprivation therapy) on the recurrence pattern in patients with BCR following RP assessed by 11C-Choline PET/CT or 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT. METHODS: Patients who developed BCR following RP and who had at least one positive lesion on PET/CT were retrospectively assessed. Positive spots were mapped as local, lymph node (LN), skeletal or visceral recurrence. A distinction was made between locoregional (prostate bed and pelvic LN) and extrapelvic recurrence (skeletal, visceral and/or extrapelvic LN). Patients were categorized according to postoperative treatment received in three subgroups (RT, ADT and RT + ADT) and compared with the reference group (RP only). The impact of the radiation field was also investigated. RESULTS: We identified 200 patients assessed by 68Ga-PSMA-11 (80%) or 11C-Choline PET/CT (20%). Patients who received postoperative RT + ADT had less LN recurrence distal to the common iliac bifurcation (26.7% vs 66.6%; p = 0.0004), but more recurrence to retroperitoneal LN than the reference group (38% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.02). Moreover, the RT + ADT subgroup had more extrapelvic recurrence compared to the reference group (66.2% vs 40.8%, p = 0.02). Patients who received RT to the prostate bed had more recurrence distal to the common iliac bifurcation compared to those who received RT to the prostate bed + pelvic LN (51.6% vs 26.1%, p = 0.0069). CONCLUSION: Post-prostatectomy treatments (ADT and/or RT) and the postoperative radiation field (prostate bed vs. prostate bed + pelvis) have a significant impact on the recurrence pattern. This knowledge can help clinicians to counsel their patients on their chances of being eligible for (locoregional) metastasis-directed therapies.

Fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS) to prevent keyhole deformity in simple anal fistula: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Fistulotomy remains the gold standard for the surgical treatment of simple anal fistula, but may cause fecal incontinence and a characteristic anal 'keyhole' deformity. Although seemingly trivial, keyhole deformity may lead to bothersome symptoms such as anal pruritus and fecal soiling. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of fistulectomy and primary sphincteroplasty (FIPS), a technique with immediate sphincter reconstruction, in the treatment of simple anal fistula and the prevention of keyhole deformity created by simple fistulotomy. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on all consecutive patients who underwent FIPS for a simple anal fistula at our institution between January 2015 and August 2019. The primary outcome of the study was the rate of early postoperative wound dehiscence, which essentially transforms a FIPS into a simple fistulotomy and may lead to keyhole deformity. All patients received follow-up at regular intervals to evaluate fistula healing and the presence of keyhole deformity. RESULTS: FIPS was performed in 24 patients (median age: 52.8 years). After a median follow-up time of 3.0 (2.0, 6.3) months, the overall healing rate was 95.8% (23/24 patients). Six (25%) patients experienced early postoperative wound dehiscence resulting in the development of a keyhole deformity. Five of them were symptomatic (mainly soiling). Keyhole deformity was diagnosed at a median time of 6.0 (3.8, 7.5) months postoperatively. The occurrence of early wound dehiscence and subsequent keyhole deformity was associated with a posteriorly located fistula (p = .02). CONCLUSION: FIPS avoids the development of keyhole deformity in the majority of patients with simple anal fistula, but is less successful in posterior fistulas. Since FIPS is a very effective, fast and simple procedure, it should be considered a valid alternative for the treatment of every simple anal fistula.

Correction to: Metastasectomy for visceral and skeletal oligorecurrent prostate cancer.

The authors have requested the removal of the Excel file in Electronic Supplementary Material to protect patient's privacy.

Metastasectomy for visceral and skeletal oligorecurrent prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Metastasis direct therapy (MDT) is a common practice in different fields of oncology. However, there is a lack of data on surgical MDT in visceral/skeletal oligometastatic prostate cancer (PCa). We aimed to assess the role of surgical excision of visceral and skeletal PCa recurrence. METHODS: Seventeen PCa patients experienced metachronous visceral or skeletal oligometastatic recurrence following maximal local treatment. Oligometastatic recurrence was defined as 1-3 lesions, detected with the best imaging technique available at the time of diagnosis. All patients underwent metastasectomy and were followed for a median of 43 months. Postoperative complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Kaplan-Meier plots were used to assess overall survival. RESULTS: Fourteen patients (82%) had visceral lesions, two had bone lesions (12%), and one had an abdominal wall metastasis (6%). Four patients (24%) were under active ADT at the time of metastasectomy. PSA decreased after metastasectomy in 16 (94%) patients. Ten (77%) of the 13 ADT-naïve patients had a PSA decrease of ≥ 50%. Following metastasectomy, 16 (94.1%) patients developed metastatic recurrence of which 11 (64.7%) were again oligometastatic, amenable for repeated MDT. The median time to metastatic recurrence was 14 months (range 6.4-40). We observed 8% Clavien-Dindo grade 3-4 complications in 21 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In this report, we analyzed the outcomes of surgical excision of visceral and skeletal PCa recurrence following primary treatment. We found that removing metastasis to the bone and viscera can be associated with long-term disease-free periods at a low rate of serious complications. These exploratory results should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Tumor Volume and Clinical Failure in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy.

INTRODUCTION: To identify the most significant cut-off of tumor volume (TV) for prediction of clinical failure (CF) among high-risk prostate cancer (hPCa) patients. METHODS: Within a multi-institutional cohort, 262 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for hPCa were identified. CF was defined as local recurrence or distant metastases. A time dependent ROC curve was used to evaluate the area under the curve (AUC) using TV as single marker to predict clinical failure at 10 years. We searched for the TV cut off value with the highest combined sensitivity and specificity predicting CF. Three multivariable Cox regression analyses (MVA) tested the predictors of CF after RP. Predictors of the model 1 were pre-operative PSA, pathologic stage (PT), pathologic Gleason sum (GS), surgical margin status, and lymph node invasion. Predictors of the models 2 and 3 were the same of model 1 plus TV as a continuous or dichotomous variable using the defined cutoff, respectively. Validation (leave-one-out-cross-validation-LOOCV) of each model was performed. RESULTS: Overall, 46 (17.6%) patients experienced CF. The TV value was 6.29 ml. In MVA of models 2 and 3, PT and GS remained independent predictors of CF. Moreover, in model 2 TV (HR:1.07,) and in model 3 TV >6.29 ml (HR:2.99,) were independently associated with CF. In LOOCV, the C-index of models 1-3 were 65.53%, 71.75%, and 70.26%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: TV is an independent predictor of CF in hPCa patients. Patients with a TV exceeding the cut-off of 6.29 ml are more likely to develop CF. Prostate 77:3-9, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The value of surgical release after obstructive anti-incontinence surgery: An aid for clinical decision making.

AIMS: To present satisfaction rates after surgical release of obstructive anti-incontinence surgery, to look for predictive factors for outcome and to define the optimal moment to perform the surgical release. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 87 women at first, second, and last follow-up at a median of 2 (0.5-7), 4 (2-12), and 108 (29-156) months after surgical release. Obstruction was defined as urinary retention, straining to void after overcorrected anti-incontinence treatment or urodynamic bladder outlet obstruction. Patients' satisfaction was assessed using a 4 point Likert scale. RESULTS: Satisfaction rates at first, second, and last follow-up were 66% (n = 54/82), 54% (n = 37/69), and 74% (n = 43/58) respectively. Postoperatively, patients complained about overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms in 37% (n = 30/81) and SUI in 28% (n = 23/81) at first follow-up and in 41% (n = 28/68) and 27% (n = 18/68) at second follow-up for OAB symptoms and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) respectively. When surgical release was performed more than 180 days after original surgery, less SUI (P = 0.008) was reported. When performed within 70 days in patients without pre-operative OAB symptoms, less post-operative OAB symptoms (P = 0.05) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical release can be very successful in relieving obstruction due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) after anti-incontinence surgery. Persistent OAB symptoms and recurrent SUI are the main reasons for being dissatisfied. To lower the odds for recurrent SUI, surgical release should be performed more than 180 days after original surgery. Patients without pre-operative OAB symptoms are at higher risk of developing post-operative OAB symptoms when treatment is delayed more than 70 days.

Management of prostate cancer in older patients: updated recommendations of a working group of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology.

In 2010, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) developed treatment guidelines for men with prostate cancer who are older than 70 years old. In 2013, a new multidisciplinary SIOG working group was formed to update these recommendations. The consensus of the task force is that older men with prostate cancer should be managed according to their individual health status, not according to age. On the basis of a validated rapid health status screening instrument and simple assessment, the task force recommends that patients are classed into three groups for treatment: healthy or fit patients who should have the same treatment options as younger patients; vulnerable patients with reversible impairment who should receive standard treatment after medical intervention; and frail patients with non-reversible impairment who should receive adapted treatment.

Fibroblast Activation Protein-α and the Immune Landscape: Unraveling T1 Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Progression.

Background and objective: The tumor microenvironment (TME) in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) plays an important role in the anticancer response. We aimed to identify the prognostic biomarkers in the TME of patients with NMIBC for progression to ≥T2. Methods: From our institutional database, 40 patients with T1 high-risk NMIBC who progressed were pair matched for Club Urologico Español de Tratamiento Oncologico (CUETO) progression variables with 80 patients who never progressed despite longer follow-up. Progression was defined as ≥T2 or extravesical disease. Patients were treated at least with bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) induction (five or more of six doses). Immunohistochemical (IHC) markers for the TME were used on tissue at first T1 diagnosis: CD8-PanCK, GZMB-CD8-FOXP3, CD163, PD-L1 SP142/SP263, fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP), and CK5-GATA3. Full tissue slides were annotated digitally. Relative marker area (IHC-positive area/total area) or density (IHC-positive cells per area; n/mm2) was calculated, differentiating between regions of interest (ROIs; T1, Ta, and carcinoma in situ) and between compartments (stromal, epithelial, and combined). Differences in IHC variables were assessed using the t test, for continuous variables using analysis of variance and comparisons of more than two groups using Tukey's test. Conditional logistic regression for progression at 5-yr follow-up was performed with clusters based on pair matching. Key findings and limitations: Only FAP expression (increase per 50%) in T1 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.70) and all ROIs combined (OR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.14-2.29) correlated significantly with progression. None of the other clinicopathological/IHC variables correlated with progression. Conclusions and clinical implications: FAP is a potential prognostic biomarker for progression in high-risk NMIBC. FAP is a marker for cancer-associated fibroblasts and is linked to immunosuppression and neoangiogenesis, which makes future investigation clinically relevant. Patient summary: We found that progression of high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer to muscle-invasive disease is less in patients with lower fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) expression, which is a marker for cancer-associated fibroblasts.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines provide recommendations for the management of clinically localised prostate cancer (PCa). This paper aims to present a summary of the 2024 version of the EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on the screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised PCa. METHODS: The panel performed a literature review of all new data published in English, covering the time frame between May 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated, and a strength rating for each recommendation was added based on a systematic review of the evidence. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: A risk-adapted strategy for identifying men who may develop PCa is advised, generally commencing at 50 yr of age and based on individualised life expectancy. The use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in order to avoid unnecessary biopsies is recommended. When a biopsy is considered, a combination of targeted and regional biopsies should be performed. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging is the most sensitive technique for identifying metastatic spread. Active surveillance is the appropriate management for men with low-risk PCa, as well as for selected favourable intermediate-risk patients with International Society of Urological Pathology grade group 2 lesions. Local therapies are addressed, as well as the management of persistent prostate-specific antigen after surgery. A recommendation to consider hypofractionation in intermediate-risk patients is provided. Patients with cN1 PCa should be offered a local treatment combined with long-term intensified hormonal treatment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The evidence in the field of diagnosis, staging, and treatment of localised PCa is evolving rapidly. These PCa guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. PATIENT SUMMARY: This article is the summary of the guidelines for "curable" prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is "found" through a multistep risk-based screening process. The objective is to find as many men as possible with a curable cancer. Prostate cancer is curable if it resides in the prostate; it is then classified into low-, intermediary-, and high-risk localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. These risk classes are the basis of the treatments. Low-risk prostate cancer is treated with "active surveillance", a treatment with excellent prognosis. For low-intermediary-risk active surveillance should also be discussed as an option. In other cases, active treatments, surgery, or radiation treatment should be discussed along with the potential side effects to allow shared decision-making.

EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II-2024 Update: Treatment of Relapsing and Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The European Association of Urology (EAU)-European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM)-European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)-International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP)-International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines on the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) have been updated. Here we provide a summary of the 2024 guidelines. METHODS: The panel performed a literature review of new data, covering the time frame between 2020 and 2023. The guidelines were updated and a strength rating for each recommendation was added on the basis of a systematic review of the evidence. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS: Risk stratification for relapsing PCa after primary therapy may guide salvage therapy decisions. New treatment options, such as androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs), ARTA + chemotherapy combinations, PARP inhibitors and their combinations, and prostate-specific membrane antigen-based therapy have become available for men with metastatic PCa. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Evidence for relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant PCa is evolving rapidly. These guidelines reflect the multidisciplinary nature of PCa management. The full version is available online (http://uroweb.org/guideline/ prostate-cancer/). PATIENT SUMMARY: This article summarises the 2024 guidelines for the treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. These guidelines are based on evidence and guide doctors in discussing treatment decisions with their patients. The guidelines are updated every year.

A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Brachytherapy Boost Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.

CONTEXT: The optimum use of brachytherapy (BT) combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for localised/locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review to determine the benefits and harms of EBRT-BT. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were systematically searched for studies published between January 1, 2000 and June 7, 2022, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Eligible studies compared low- or high-dose-rate EBRT-BT against EBRT ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and/or radical prostatectomy (RP) ± postoperative radiotherapy (RP ± EBRT). The main outcomes were biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), severe late genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal toxicity, metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS), at/beyond 5 yr. Risk of bias was assessed and confounding assessment was performed. A meta-analysis was performed for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Seventy-three studies were included (two RCTs, seven prospective studies, and 64 retrospective studies). Most studies included participants with intermediate-or high-risk PCa. Most studies, including both RCTs, used ADT with EBRT-BT. Generally, EBRT-BT was associated with improved bPFS compared with EBRT, but similar MFS, CSS, and OS. A meta-analysis of the two RCTs showed superior bPFS with EBRT-BT (estimated fixed-effect hazard ratio [HR] 0.54 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.40-0.72], p < 0.001), with absolute improvements in bPFS at 5-6 yr of 4.9-16%. However, no difference was seen for MFS (HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.53-1.28], p = 0.4) or OS (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.63-1.19], p = 0.4). Fewer studies examined RP ± EBRT. There is an increased risk of severe late GU toxicity, especially with low-dose-rate EBRT-BT, with some evidence of increased prevalence of severe GU toxicity at 5-6 yr of 6.4-7% across the two RCTs. CONCLUSIONS: EBRT-BT can be considered for unfavourable intermediate/high-risk localised/locally advanced PCa in patients with good urinary function, although the strength of this recommendation based on the European Association of Urology guideline methodology is weak given that it is based on improvements in biochemical control. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found good evidence that radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy keeps prostate cancer controlled for longer, but it could lead to worse urinary side effects than radiotherapy without brachytherapy, and its impact on cancer spread and patient survival is less clear.

Predictors of Recurrence After Metastasis-directed Therapy in Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Following Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is performed to delay systemic treatments for oligorecurrent disease after primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the predictors of therapeutic response of MDT for oligorecurrent PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: bicentric, retrospective study, including consecutive patients who underwent MDT for oligorecurrent PCa after radical prostatectomy (RP; 2006-2020) was conducted. MDT encompassed stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), salvage lymph node dissection (sLND), whole-pelvis/retroperitoneal radiation therapy (WP[R]RT), or metastasectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: ndpoints were 5-yr radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), palliative androgen deprivation treatment (pADT)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) together with prognostic factors for MFS following primary MDT. Survival outcomes were studied by Kaplan-Meier survival and univariable Cox regression (UVA). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 211 MDT patients were included; 122 (58%) developed a secondary recurrence. Salvage lymph node dissection was performed in 119 (56%), SBRT in 48 (23%), and WP(R)RT in 31 (15%) of the cases. Two patients received sLND + SBRT and one received sLND + WPRT. Eleven (5%) patients received metastasectomies. The median follow-up since RP was 100 mo, while follow-up after MDT was 42 mo. The 5-yr rPFS, MFS, androgen deprivation treatment(-free survival, castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival, CSS, and OS after MDT were 23%, 68%, 58%, 82%, 93%, and 87% respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between cN1 (n = 114) and cM+ (n = 97) for 5-yr MFS (83% vs 51%, p < 0.001), pADT-free survival (70% vs 49%, p = 0.014), and CSS (100% vs 86%, p = 0.019). UVA was performed to assess the risk factors (RFs) for MFS in cN1 and cM+. Alpha was set at 10%. RFs for MFS in cN1 were lower initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at the time of RP (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.15 [0.02-1.02], p = 0.053], pN stage at RP (2.91 [0.83-10.24], p = 0.096), nonpersisting PSA after RP (0.47 [0.19-1.12], p = 0.089), higher PSA at primary MDT (2.38 [1.07-5.24], p = 0.032), and number of positive nodes on imaging (1.65 [1.14-2.40], p < 0.01). RFs for MFS in cM+ were higher pathological Gleason score (1.86 [0.93-3.73], p = 0.078), number of lesions on imaging (0.77 [0.57-1.04], p = 0.083), and cM1b/cM1c (non-nodal metastatic recurrence; 2.62 [1.58-4.34], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Following MDT, 23% of patients were free of a second recurrence at 5-yr follow-up. Moreover, cM+ patients had significantly worse outcomes in terms of MFS, pADT-free survival, and CSS. The RFs for a metastatic recurrence can be used for counseling patients, to inform prognosis, and potentially select candidates for MDT. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this paper, we looked at the outcomes of using localized, patient-tailored treatment for imaging-detected recurrent prostate cancer in lymph nodes, bone, or viscera (maximum five recurrences on imaging). Our results showed that targeted treatment of the metastatic lesions could delay the premature use of hormone therapy.

Unanswered questions in prostate cancer - findings of an international multi-stakeholder consensus by the PIONEER consortium.

PIONEER is a European network of excellence for big data in prostate cancer consisting of 37 private and public stakeholders from 9 countries across Europe. Many progresses have been done in prostate cancer management, but unanswered questions in the field still exist, and big data could help to answer these questions. The PIONEER consortium conducted a two-round modified Delphi survey aiming at building consensus between two stakeholder groups - health-care professionals and patients with prostate cancer - about the most important questions in the field of prostate cancer to be answered using big data. Respondents were asked to consider what would be the effect of answering the proposed questions on improving diagnosis and treatment outcomes for patients with prostate cancer and to score these questions on a scale of 1 (not important) to 9 (critically important). The mean percentage of participants who scored each of the proposed questions as critically important was calculated across the two stakeholder groups and used to rank the questions and identify the highest scoring questions in the critically important category. The identification of questions in prostate cancer that are important to various stakeholders will help the PIONEER consortium to provide answers to these questions to improve the clinical care of patients with prostate cancer.

Impact of Epithelial Histological Types, Subtypes, and Growth Patterns on Oncological Outcomes for Patients with Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer Treated with Curative Intent: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: The optimal management for men with prostate cancer (PCa) with unconventional histology (UH) is unknown. The outcome for these cancers might be worse than for conventional PCa and so different approaches may be needed. OBJECTIVE: To compare oncological outcomes for conventional and UH PCa in men with localized disease treated with curative intent. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review adhering to the Referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022296013) was performed in July 2021. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We screened 3651 manuscripts and identified 46 eligible studies (reporting on 1 871 814 men with conventional PCa and 6929 men with 10 different PCa UHs). Extraprostatic extension and lymph node metastases, but not positive margin rates, were more common with UH PCa than with conventional tumors. PCa cases with cribriform pattern, intraductal carcinoma, or ductal adenocarcinoma had higher rates of biochemical recurrence and metastases after radical prostatectomy than for conventional PCa cases. Lower cancer-specific survival rates were observed for mixed cribriform/intraductal and cribriform PCa. By contrast, pathological findings and oncological outcomes for mucinous and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN)-like PCa were similar to those for conventional PCa. Limitations of this review include low-quality studies, a risk of reporting bias, and a scarcity of studies that included radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Intraductal, cribriform, and ductal UHs may have worse oncological outcomes than for conventional and mucinous or PIN-like PCa. Alternative treatment approaches need to be evaluated in men with these cancers. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the literature to explore whether prostate cancers with unconventional growth patterns behave differently to conventional prostate cancers. We found that some unconventional growth patterns have worse outcomes, so we need to investigate if they need different treatments. Urologists should be aware of these growth patterns and their clinical impact.

Laparoscopic assisted mini-ECIRS for ectopic kidney lithiasis: A case report and literature review.

INTRODUCTION: Ectopic kidney is a rare anatomic variant with an incidence of about 1 in 900. Renal stones can pose a challenge when a standard approach is not possible. Laparoscopic-assisted endourologic procedure can be a feasible and safe choice. CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW: We present a case of 32 years old man with spastic quadriplegia, megacolon and pelvic kidney undergoing intervention of laparoscopic-assisted Mini ECIRS for staghorn stone of the left pelvic kidney. To the best of our knowledge, only 59 cases are reported in the literature concerning laparoscopically assisted encdourologic treatment which seems a feasible, safe and adaptable technique in selected complex cases. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted mini ECIRS is a viable option for the treatment of ectopic kidney stones. This technique should be considered when anatomical anomalies are encountered, to avoid puncture-related complications.

Antizyme Inhibitor 1 Regulates Matrikine Expression and Enhances the Metastatic Potential of Aggressive Primary Prostate Cancer.

Molecular drivers of metastasis in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer are poorly understood. Therefore, we aim to study molecular drivers of metastatic progression in patients with high-risk prostate cancer. A retrospective matched case-control study of two clinico-pathologically identical groups of patients with high-risk prostate cancer was undertaken. One group developed metastatic recurrence (n = 19) while the other did not (n = 25). The primary index tumor was identified by a uro-pathologist, followed by DNA and RNA extraction for somatic copy-number aberration (SCNA) analysis and whole-transcriptome gene expression analysis. In vitro and in vivo studies included cell line manipulation and xenograft models.The integrative CNA and gene expression analyses identified an increase in Antizyme Inhibitor 1 (AZIN1) gene expression within a focal amplification of 8q22.3, which was associated with metastatic recurrence of patients with high-risk prostate cancer in four independent cohorts. The effects of AZIN1 knockdown were evaluated, due to its therapeutic potential. AZIN1 knockdown effected proliferation and metastatic potential of prostate cancer cells and xenograft models. RNA sequencing after AZIN1 knockdown in prostate cancer cells revealed upregulation of genes coding for collagen subunits. The observed effect on cell migration after AZIN1 knockdown was mimicked when exposing prostate cancer cells to bio-active molecules deriving from COL4A1 and COL4A2. Our integrated CNA and gene expression analysis of primary high-risk prostate cancer identified the AZIN1 gene as a novel driver of metastatic progression, by altering collagen subunit expression. Future research should further investigate its therapeutic potential in preventing metastatic recurrence. IMPLICATIONS: AZIN1 was identified as driver of metastatic progression in high-risk prostate cancer through matrikine regulation.

Updating and Integrating Core Outcome Sets for Localised, Locally Advanced, Metastatic, and Nonmetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: An Update from the PIONEER Consortium.

CONTEXT: Harmonisation of outcome reporting and definitions for clinical trials and routine patient records can enable health care systems to provide more efficient outcome-driven and patient-centred interventions. We report on the work of the PIONEER Consortium in this context for prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: To update and integrate existing core outcome sets (COS) for PCa for the different stages of the disease, assess their applicability, and develop standardised definitions of prioritised outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We followed a four-stage process involving: (1) systematic reviews; (2) qualitative interviews; (3) expert group meetings to agree standardised terminologies; and (4) recommendations for the most appropriate definitions of clinician-reported outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Following four systematic reviews, a multinational interview study, and expert group consensus meetings, we defined the most clinically suitable definitions for (1) COS for localised and locally advanced PCa and (2) COS for metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant PCa. No new outcomes were identified in our COS for localised and locally advanced PCa. For our COS for metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant PCa, nine new core outcomes were identified. CONCLUSIONS: These are the first COS for PCa for which the definitions of prioritised outcomes have been surveyed in a systematic, transparent, and replicable way. This is also the first time that outcome definitions across all prostate cancer COS have been agreed on by a multidisciplinary expert group and recommended for use in research and clinical practice. To limit heterogeneity across research, these COS should be recommended for future effectiveness trials, systematic reviews, guidelines and clinical practice of localised and metastatic PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: Patient outcomes after treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) are difficult to compare because of variability. To allow better use of data from patients with PCa, the PIONEER Consortium has standardised and recommended outcomes (and their definitions) that should be collected as a minimum in all future studies.

Diagnostic and prognostic factors in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: As part of the PIONEER Consortium objectives, we have explored which diagnostic and prognostic factors (DPFs) are available in relation to our previously defined clinician and patient-reported outcomes for prostate cancer (PCa). DESIGN: We performed a systematic review to identify validated and non-validated studies. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched on 21 January 2020. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Only quantitative studies were included. Single studies with fewer than 50 participants, published before 2014 and looking at outcomes which are not prioritised in the PIONEER core outcome set were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: After initial screening, we extracted data following the Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of prognostic factor studies (CHARMS-PF) criteria and discussed the identified factors with a multidisciplinary expert group. The quality of the included papers was scored for applicability and risk of bias using validated tools such as PROBAST, Quality in Prognostic Studies and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2. RESULTS: The search identified 6604 studies, from which 489 DPFs were included. Sixty-four of those were internally or externally validated. However, only three studies on diagnostic and seven studies on prognostic factors had a low risk of bias and a low risk concerning applicability. CONCLUSION: Most of the DPFs identified require additional evaluation and validation in properly designed studies before they can be recommended for use in clinical practice. The PIONEER online search tool for DPFs for PCa will enable researchers to understand the quality of the current research and help them design future studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no ethical implications.

Patient- and Tumour-related Prognostic Factors for Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: While urinary incontinence (UI) commonly occurs after radical prostatectomy (RP), it is unclear what factors increase the risk of UI development. OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review of patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors for post-RP UI. The primary outcome was UI within 3 mo after RP. Secondary outcomes included UI at 3-12 mo and ≥12 mo after RP. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Databases including Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched between January 1990 and May 2020. All studies reporting patient- and tumour-related prognostic factors in univariable or multivariable analyses were included. Surgical factors were excluded. Risk of bias (RoB) and confounding assessments were performed using the Quality In Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all prognostic factor, where possible. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 119 studies (5 randomised controlled trials, 24 prospective, 88 retrospective, and 2 case-control studies) with 131 379 patients were included. RoB was high for study participation and confounding; moderate to high for statistical analysis, study attrition, and prognostic factor measurement; and low for outcome measurements. Significant prognostic factors for postoperative UI within 3 mo after RP were age (odds ratio [OR] per yearly increase 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.05), membranous urethral length (MUL; OR per 1-mm increase 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88), prostate volume (PV; OR per 1-ml increase 1.005, 95% CI 1.000-1.011), and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI; OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.50). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing age, shorter MUL, greater PV, and higher CCI are independent prognostic factors for UI within 3 mo after RP, with all except CCI remaining prognostic at 3-12 mo. PATIENT SUMMARY: We reviewed the literature to identify patient and disease factors associated with urinary incontinence after surgery for prostate cancer. We found increasing age, larger prostate volume, shorter length of a section of the urethra (membranous urethra), and lower fitness were associated with worse urinary incontinence for the first 3 mo after surgery, with all except lower fitness remaining predictive at 3-12 mo.