Exploring barriers and enabling factors for surgical task sharing with physician assistants in Liberia: a qualitative pre-implementation study.

OBJECTIVES: This study explores potential barriers and enabling factors that may influence the acceptance of implementation of a surgical task-sharing initiative targeting physician assistants (PAs) in Liberia. DESIGN: A qualitative, pre-implementation study using semistructured interviews. Data was analysed in NVivo V.12 using deductive coding and the consolidated framework for implementation research as a guide. SETTING: Liberia has few surgical providers and a poor surgical infrastructure resulting in a very low surgical volume. The research was conducted in the context of an already running surgical task-sharing programme for midwives. PARTICIPANTS: In 2019, a total of 30 key stakeholders in the field of surgery and the PAs training programme were interviewed. RESULTS: The majority of the stakeholders supported the idea of training PAs in surgery. The high unemployment rate among PAs and the need for career advancement of this cadre were important enabling factors. Resistance against surgical task sharing for mid-level clinicians is multifaceted. The Ministry of Health (MOH) did not share a common vision. Opponents within the MOH believed budgetary constraints within the MOH and the lack of surgical infrastructure is a more pressing problem compared with the surgically trained human resources. Another important group of opponents are medical officers (MOs) and their professional bodies. Many of their negative beliefs around surgical task sharing reflect lessons to be drawn from the current surgical training programme for midwives. CONCLUSION: Prior to deciding on implementation of a surgical training programme for PAs, wider support is needed. If surgical task sharing with PAs is to be considered, the intervention should focus on adapting the 'adaptable' periphery of the intervention to broaden the support of the MOH, MOs and their professional bodies. Failing to obtain such support should make the implementors consider alternative strategies to strengthen surgical human resources in rural Liberia.

Determinants of breastfeeding practice in Pujehun district, southern Sierra Leone: a mixed-method study.

BACKGROUND: It is well established that exclusive breastfeeding can play a critical role in reducing child morbidity and mortality. Limited research has been done thus far on the practice and perceptions of breastfeeding in Sierra Leone, where more than 10 % of children die before the age of five. This study aimed to gain understanding into and explore both matters in order to develop recommendations for effective strategies to promote breastfeeding practice in Pujehun District, Southern Sierra Leone. METHODS: This exploratory mixed-method study included a cross-sectional survey of 194 mothers, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Logistic regression analysis was used calculated odds ratios of factors associated with primarily breastfeeding practice, defined as 'Children under six months of age who are fed with breast milk only and children older than six months of age that were exclusively breastfed up to six months', based on recall from birth. Exclusive breastfeeding rate was based on breastfeeding practice 24 h prior to the survey. Qualitative data was analysed through a deductive approach, using a pre-determined framework on determinants of breastfeeding. RESULTS: This study revealed an exclusive breastfeeding rate of 62.8% (95% CI 53.9, 71.7); dropping from 74% in the 0-1-month age group to 33% in the 4-5 months group. Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data revealed enabling factors for primarily breastfeeding practice included mothers receiving support during their first breastfeed, pregnant women being provided with information on the benefits of the practice, counselling by nurses, support from husbands, and women's awareness of how their friends and family members fed their own babies. The main barriers were a lack of encouragement by husbands, women's perception that their infants' stools were abnormal or that they were not producing enough breast milk. CONCLUSIONS: Although the exclusive breastfeeding may have risen over recent years, a gap remains compared to World Health Organization recommendations. According to the breastfeeding determinants identified in this study, promotion of counselling by a nurse, encouragement of husbands' support, and improve knowledge of mothers on breastfeeding are recommended to be incorporated in the design of future health programs.

Barriers to increase surgical productivity in Sierra Leone: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore factors influencing surgical provider productivity and identify barriers against and opportunities to increase individual surgical productivity in Sierra Leone, in order to explain the observed increase in unmet surgical need from 92.2% to 92.7% and the decrease in surgical productivity to 1.7 surgical procedures per provider per week between 2012 and 2017. DESIGN AND METHODS: This explanatory qualitative study consisted of in-depth interviews about factors influencing surgical productivity in Sierra Leone. Interviews were analysed with a thematic network analysis and used to develop a conceptual framework. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 21 surgical providers and hospital managers working in 12 public and private non-profit hospitals in all regions in Sierra Leone. RESULTS: Surgical providers in Sierra Leone experience a broad range of factors within and outside the health system that influence their productivity. The main barriers involve both patient and facility financial constraints, lack of equipment and supplies, weak regulation of providers and facilities and a small surgical workforce, which experiences a lack of recognition. Initiation of a Free Health Care Initiative for obstetric and paediatric care, collaborations with partners or non-governmental organisations, and increased training opportunities for highly motivated surgical providers are identified as opportunities to increase productivity. DISCUSSION: Broader nationwide health system strengthening is required to facilitate an increase in surgical productivity and meet surgical needs in Sierra Leone. Development of a national strategy for surgery, obstetrics and anaesthesia, including methods to reduce financial barriers for patients, improve supply-mechanisms and expand training opportunities for new and established surgical providers can increase surgical capacity. Establishment of legal frameworks and appropriate remuneration are crucial for sustainability and retention of surgical health workers.

The interface between clinicians and laboratory staff: A field study in northern Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: Strengthening the communication and professional relationships between clinicians and laboratory workers is essential in order to positively change clinicians' attitudes about the reliability of diagnostic tests, enhancing the use of laboratory diagnostics and, ultimately, improving patient care. We developed an analytical framework to gain insight into the factors that influence communication amongst health professionals. OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the interaction between clinicians and laboratory workers influences the use of laboratory test results in clinical decision making. METHODS: Four health facilities in northern Tanzania were selected using convenience sampling, whereas study participants were selected using purposive sampling. The quantitative and qualitative data collection methods included self-administered questionnaires; semi-structured, individual interviews; in-depth, individual interviews; and/or focus group discussions with clinicians and laboratory workers. Thematic content analyses were performed on qualitative data based on the framework. Descriptive statistical analyses of quantitative data were conducted using Microsoft Excel. RESULTS: Contact between clinicians and laboratory professionals is seldom institutionalised and collaboration is rare. The clinicians believe collaboration with laboratory staff is a challenge because of the gap in education levels. Laboratory workers' education levels are often lower than their positions require, leading to clinicians' lack of respect for and confidence in laboratory professionals, which compromises the laboratory staff's motivation. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital managers, clinicians and laboratory workers need to recognise the critical and complementary roles each professional plays and the importance of addressing the gap between them. Field application of the framework proved successful, justifying the expansion of this study to a larger geographical area to include additional healthcare institutions.

Understanding the interface between clinical and laboratory staff.

BACKGROUND: The interface between clinicians and laboratory staff is where the two meet and work together to provide quality care to their clients (patients). Effectiveness of the interface depends on the way the two groups of professionals relate to and communicate with each other. The number and type of tests requested and the use of the test results for clinical decision making can be influenced by the interface between clinicians and laboratory staff. A model to understand the factors and dynamics around the interface is lacking. OBJECTIVES: To propose a new conceptual model to gain insight and analyse factors that influence the laboratory-clinical staff interface. METHODS: To develop the conceptual model, a literature study was performed, regulatory guidelines and standards for laboratories were analysed and discussions were held with experts on the topic. RESULT: A conceptual model and analytical framework provided good guidance in understanding and assessing the organisational and personal factors shaping the interface. The model was based on three elements: (1) the three phases of communication (pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical); (2) the organisational and personal factors of interaction; and (3) the socio-political, economic and cultural context in which clinicians and laboratory staff operate. CONCLUSION: Assessment of the interface between clinicians and laboratory workers can be performed in a systematic way. Applying this model will provide information to managers of health institutions and heads of laboratories and clinical departments about what happens when clinicians and laboratory staff interact, thus aiding them in designing strategies to improve this interface.