Age, Serum Creatinine, and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Improved the Performance of the CatLet Angiographic Scoring System in Terms of Outcome Predictions for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Median 4.3-Year Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: We recently developed the Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) angiographic scoring system. Our preliminary study demonstrated that the CatLet score better predicted clinical outcomes than the SYNTAX score. The current study aimed at assessing whether 3 clinical variables (CVs) - age, serum creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) - improved the performance of the CatLet score in outcome predictions in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: This study was a post hoc study of the CatLet score validation trial. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and secondary endpoints were all-cause deaths and cardiac deaths. RESULTS: Over 1,185 person-years (median [interquartile range], 4.3 [3.8-4.9] years), there were 64 MACCEs (20.8%), 56 all-cause deaths (18.2%), and 47 cardiac deaths (15.2%). The addition of the 3 CVs to the stand-alone CatLet score significantly increased the Harrell's C-index by 0.0967 (p = 0.002) in MACCEs, by 0.1354 (p < 0.001) in all-cause deaths, and by 0.1187 (p = 0.001) in cardiac deaths. When compared with the stand-alone CatLet score, improved discrimination and better calibration led to a significantly refined risk stratification, particularly at the intermediate-risk category. CONCLUSIONS: CatLet score had a predicting value for clinical outcome in AMI patients. This predicting value can be improved through a combination with age, serum creatinine, and LVEF (http://www.chictr.org.cn; unique identifier: ChiCTR-POC-17013536).

The CatLet score and outcome prediction in acute myocardial infarction for patients undergoing primary percutaneous intervention: A proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: The Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) score accommodating the variability in coronary anatomy is a recently developed and comprehensive angiographic scoring system aimed at assisting in risk-stratification of patients with coronary artery disease. However, a validation of this angiographic scoring system is lacking. METHODS: The CatLet score was calculated retrospectively in 308 consecutively enrolled patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary endpoint, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), was stratified according to CatLet tertiles: CatLetlow ≤14 (n = 124), CatLetmid 15-21 (n = 82) and CatLettop ≥22 (n = 102). RESULTS: The CatLet score alone or after adjusting for a broad spectrum of risk factors, significantly predicted clinical outcomes at a median 4.3-year follow-up. Multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95%CI)/unit higher score were 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for MACCE, 1.06 (1.04-1.07) for cardiac death, and 1.05 (1.04-1.07) for all-cause death. When compared to the SYNTAX score, improved discrimination and better calibration of this CatLet score resulted in a significantly refined risk stratification. The overall category-free net reclassification improvement afforded by this CatLet score was as follows: 37.2% (p = .008) for MACCEs, 35.5% (p = .0249) for cardiac death, and 31.8% (p = .0316) for all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: The ability to integrate the variability in coronary anatomy into angiographic scoring makes the CatLet score a more specific tool for outcome predictions in AMI. (http://www.chictr.org.cn. Unique identifiers: ChiCTR-POC-17013536).

A Novel Angiographic Risk Score for Femoropopliteal Interventions.

PURPOSE: To present a novel angiographic scoring system that stratifies the risk of restenosis after endovascular therapy (EVT) to inform the decision to use paclitaxel-eluting devices in the femoropopliteal segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicenter registry including 1799 limbs of 1578 patients (mean age 74±9 years; 1090 men) with symptomatic peripheral artery disease undergoing intravascular ultrasound-supported femoropopliteal EVT was used as the basis for developing the angiographic score. Multivariable analysis identified baseline patient and limb characteristics associated with restenosis at 12 months. These risk factors for 12-month restenosis were explored using a generalized linear mixed model with a logit-link function in which the inter-institutional and inter-subject variability were treated as random effects. The multiple imputation method was adopted to address missing data. Results of the regression analysis are presented as the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Twelve-month primary patency was estimated to be 65.1% (95% CI 62.7% to 67.5%). After multivariable analysis, distal reference vessel diameter per 1 mm (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.81, p<0.001), lesion length per 10 cm (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.62, p<0.001), and chronic total occlusion (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.10, p=0.004) were independently associated with the 12-month restenosis risk, whereas baseline patient risk factors were not. Compared to bare nitinol stent implantation, plain angioplasty (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.18, p<0.001) was independently associated with a higher risk of 12-month restenosis, while drug-eluting stents (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99, p=0.045) and stent-grafts (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.50, p<0.001) were independently associated with a lower risk of 12-month restenosis. The angiographic score, which was developed by using the 3 angiographic factors but not the TransAtlantic Society Consensus II (TASC) class, was significantly and independently associated with 12-month restenosis. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated a novel angiographic score for 12-month restenosis after femoropopliteal EVT in a real-world clinical practice. The developed score was significantly and independently associated with the 12-month restenosis risk, but the TASC class was not.

CatLet score and clinical CatLet score as predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting later than 12 hours from symptom onset.

BACKGROUND: Our recently developed Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) angiographic scoring system is unique in its description of the variability in the coronary anatomy, the degree of stenosis of a diseased coronary artery, and its subtended myocardial territory, and can be utilized to predict clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presenting ≤12 h after symptom onset. The current study aimed to assess whether the Clinical CatLet score (CCS), as compared with CatLet score (CS), better predicted clinical outcomes for AMI patients presenting >12 h after symptom onset. METHODS: CS was calculated in 1018 consecutive AMI patients enrolled in a retrospective registry. CCS was calculated by multiplying CS by the ACEF I score (age, creatinine, and left ventricular ejection fraction). Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at 4-year-follow-up, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization. RESULTS: Over a 4-year follow-up period, both scores were independent predictors of clinical outcomes after adjustment for a broad spectrum of risk factors. Areas-under-the-curve (AUCs) for CS and CCS were 0.72(0.68-0.75) and 0.75(0.71-0.78) for MACEs; 0.68(0.63-0.73) and 0.78(0.74-0.83) for all-cause death; 0.73(0.68-0.79) and 0.83(0.79-0.88) for cardiac death; and 0.69(0.64-0.73) and 0.75(0.7-0.79) for myocardial infarction; and 0.66(0.61-0.7) and 0.63(0.58-0.68) for revascularization, respectively. CCS performed better than CS in terms of the above-mentioned outcome predictions, as confirmed by the net reclassification and integrated discrimination indices. CONCLUSIONS: CCS was better than CS to be able to risk-stratify long-term outcomes in AMI patients presenting >12 h after symptom onset. These findings have indicated that both anatomic and clinical variables should be considered in decision-making on management of patients with AMI presenting later.

Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet) score for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis: a comparison study with pressure wire fractional flow reserve.

Background: Pressure wire fractional flow reserve (FFR) and its derivatives, such as quantitative flow ratio (QFR), computational pressure flow-derived FFR (caFFR), coronary angiography-derived FFR (FFRangio), and computed tomography-derived FFR (FFRCT), have been validated for identifying functionally significant stenosis and guiding revascularization strategy. The limitations of using these methods include the side effects of hyperemia-induced agents, additional costs, and vulnerability to microvascular resistance. FFR is related both to the degree of a stenotic coronary artery and to its subtended myocardial territory. Coronary Artery Tree Description and Lesion Evaluation (CatLet) score (also known as Hexu) is a product of the degree of a stenosis and the weighting of the affected coronary artery (myocardial territory). Hence, we hypothesized that the CatLet score could predict hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with stable coronary artery disease. They attended Sichuan Science City Hospital with at least one lesion of 50-90% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery of 2 mm or larger. FFR measurement was obtained during invasive coronary angiography. The CatLet score was obtained by multiplying a fixed value of 2.0 (for non-occlusive lesions) and the weight of the affected coronary artery. The primary endpoint was the CatLet score's diagnostic accuracy in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis, with a pressure wire FFR of ≤0.80 being used as reference. Results: We analyzed the FFR and CatLet scores from 206 vessels in 175 patients with stable coronary disease and intermediate coronary lesions. The per-vessel analysis revealed an overall good correlation between the CatLet score and the FFR [r=-0.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -0.69 to -0.52; P<0.01]. We also noted a significant CatLet score-FFR correlation for each of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), left circumflex (LCX), and right coronary artery (RCA). With a CatLet score ≥10 as a predictor of FFR ≤0.80, the overall diagnostic accuracy included a sensitivity of 78.80% (95% CI: 67.00-87.90%), a specificity of 85.00% (95% CI: 78.00-90.50%), a positive likelihood ratio of 5.25, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.25, and an area under the curve of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94). Equivalent vessel-specific results were also achieved for each of the LAD, LCX, and RCA. Conclusions: The CatLet score, solely based on visual estimation of the results of coronary angiography, demonstrated good diagnostic performance with respect to myocardial ischemia. Its clinical values in guiding revascularization warrant further investigation.

Revisit of the CatLet (Hexu) angiographic scoring system: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: We have recently developed the Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet or Hexu, invented by He and Xu) angiographic scoring system, which, considering the coronary anatomy in its diversity, the stenosis degree of a coronary artery, and the myocardial territory subtended by the diseased coronary artery, can be utilized to predict clinical outcomes for patients with acute myocardial infarction (available at www.catletscore.com). Its values for clinical practice and coronary artery disease research are building upon. Over the past two years, the principles underlying this novel angiographic scoring system do not materially change although slight adjustments have really happened. Given these adjustments and the scoring experience gained in daily use, we think that it is necessary to elaborate on these points so that readers with interest are capable to better use this CatLet or Hexu angiographic scoring system both in clinical practice and in scientific research. Methods: The principles underlying this novel angiographic scoring system include the 17-myocardial segmental model, law of competitive blood supply, and law of flow conservation. Key Content and Findings: The adjustments made to this novel angiographic scoring system include: (I) the short axis of the left ventricle at the basal level is used to characterize the six types of right coronary artery size; (II) segments marked with 'X and 'S have a unified preset difference of one segment as adopted in the characterization of left anterior descending artery; (III) segments marked with '+ have been added to explain the rare variability in the obtuse marginal branches or in the posterolateral vessels in some cases. The CatLet or Hexu angiographic scoring system strictly follows the law of flow conservation in weighting assignment, and the lesion scoring correction has been additionally emphasized and detailed. Conclusions: The elaboration on these adjustments and scoring experience gained on the CatLet or Hexu angiographic scoring system will help to boost its use in cardiovascular field. The utilities of this novel angiographic scoring system have been preliminarily validated and its future is deserving of being anticipated.

The CatLet score: a new coronary angiographic scoring tool accommodating the variable coronary anatomy for the first time.

BACKGROUND: The SYNTAX score for decision makings or outcome predictions in coronary artery disease does not account for the variations in the coronary anatomy, which is a clear fallacy for patients with less typical anatomy than suggested by the SYNTAX score. The current study aimed to derive a new coronary angiographic scoring system accommodating the variability in the coronary anatomy. METHODS: The 17-myocardial segment model and laws of competitive blood supply and flow conservation were utilized to derive this new scoring system. RESULTS: We obtained 6 types of RCA dominance, 3 types of diagonal size and 3 types of left anterior descending artery (LAD) length, which together resulted in a total of 54 patterns of coronary artery circulation to account for the variability in the coronary anatomy among individuals. A Coronary Artery Tree description and Lesion EvaluaTion (CatLet) angiographic scoring system has been designed based on the above-mentioned reclassification scheme (htpp://www.catletscore.com, IE browser is required to run this calculator). CONCLUSIONS: This new CatLet angiographic scoring system accommodated the variability in the coronary anatomy and standardized the collection of the coronary angiographic data, which could facilitate the comparison and exchange of these data between different catheter labs. Its utility for predicting the clinical outcomes and standardizing the angiographic data collection will be investigated in a series of clinical trials enrolling "all-comers" with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Inter-observer Variability in Scoring Ultra-wide-field Fluorescein Angiography in Patients with Behçet Retinal Vasculitis.

PURPOSE: To test inter-observer agreement in applying the scoring system of the Angiography Scoring of Uveitis Working Group (ASUWG) to ultra-wide-field fluorescein angiograms (UWFA) obtained from patients with Behçet retinal vasculitis. METHODS: Both standard FA and UWFA images were obtained from 21 patients with retinal vasculitis associated with Behçet disease. Three graders independently graded 21 series of standard FA and 21 series of UWFA images. Spearman rank correlation and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to analyze the correlations. RESULTS: Total scores of all angiographic signs observed in both UWFA and standard FA images were significantly correlated between each pair of graders and among the three graders (ICC of standard FA = 0.874, p<0.001; ICC of UWFA = 0.928, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ASUWG scoring system is a reliable method of scoring UWFA images with regard to judging the activity of retinal vasculitis in ocular Behçet disease.