Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants associated with improved survival and bypass graft patency compared with warfarin after infrageniculate bypass.

OBJECTIVE: No consensus has yet been reached regarding the optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant regimen for patients after lower extremity bypass. Usually, patients who have undergone below-the-knee bypass will begin oral anticoagulation therapy. Historically, the bypass has been with prosthetic conduits and the anticoagulation therapy has been warfarin. However, the use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been increasing owing to their relative ease of dosing. The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether a difference exists in the postoperative outcomes for patients who have undergone infrageniculate bypass stratified by the use of on DOACs vs warfarin. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal bypass database was queried for all patients who had undergone infrageniculate bypass, been anticoagulation naive at baseline, and been discharged with anticoagulation therapy. A survival analysis was performed for patients for ≤2 years postoperatively to determine whether discharge with warfarin vs DOACs was associated with differences in overall mortality, loss of primary patency, risk of amputation, and risk of major adverse limb events (MALE). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to control for differences in the baseline demographic factors between the two groups. RESULTS: During the study period (2007-2020) 57,887 patients had undergone infrageniculate bypass. Of these patients, 2786 had been anticoagulation naive and discharged with either warfarin (n = 1889) or DOACs (n = 897). Discharge with a DOAC was associated with a lower risk of overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.83; P = .001), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62-0.87; P < .001), risk of amputation (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.86; P = .001), and risk of MALE (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.97; P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation-naive patients who had undergone infrageniculate bypass had had higher rates of overall survival, bypass patency, amputation-free survival, and freedom from MALE when discharged with a DOAC than with warfarin.

Implementation of routine venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) rate in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy before and after implementing routine thromboprophylaxis. METHODS: This is a quasi-experimental pre-post study evaluating the VTE rate in patients with ovarian cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy following a quality improvement initiative of routine thromboprophylaxis within a single healthcare system that started in January 2017. Patients were excluded if VTE was diagnosed before initiating chemotherapy. Patient factors and perioperative variables of interest were investigated for their association with VTE through univariate and multivariate models. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients in the pre-implementation group, 3.7% (n = 5) received thromboprophylaxis. Of the 154 patients in the post-implementation group, 65.6% (n = 101) received thromboprophylaxis. Provider compliance varied from 51% in 2019 to 79.3% in 2021. The overall rate of VTE, from the start of chemotherapy to the end of treatment, was 21.3% (n = 29) pre- and 8.4% (n = 13) in the post-implementation group (p < 0.01). There was no difference in major bleeding events between groups (0% vs. 0.68%, p = 0.63). On univariate analysis, thromboprophylaxis (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.52) and post-implementation period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.17-0.69) were associated with a decreased risk of any VTE during primary treatment. On multivariate analysis, only thromboprophylaxis remained significantly associated with reduced VTE rates (aOR 0.19; 95% CI 0.07-0.53). CONCLUSION: Routine thromboprophylaxis during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with reduced risk of VTE throughout primary treatment and is not associated with increased bleeding events.

Safety of Apixaban Monotherapy for Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation-Related Acute Stroke with Intra-/Extracranial Artery Stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated whether apixaban is safe for the prevention of further adverse events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with intra-/extracranial artery stenosis (Stenosis group) compared with acute large vessel occlusion without intra-/extracranial artery stenosis (No stenosis group). We also examined whether combination therapy using apixaban and antiplatelet is safe. METHODS: ALVO (Apixaban on clinical outcome of patients with Large Vessel Occlusion [LVO] or stenosis) was a historical and prospective multicenter registry at 38 centers in Japan. Patients with NVAF and acute LVO or stenosis who received apixaban within 14 days after onset were included. We conducted the post hoc analysis using the ALVO dataset. We compared patients with stenosis versus those without stenosis in terms of the primary outcome, which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, major bleeding events, and ischemic events 365 days after onset. RESULTS: Of the 662 patients, 54 (8.2%) patients were classified into the Stenosis group, and 104 patients of the total (16%) reached the primary outcome. The cumulative incidence of primary outcome was not significantly different between the No stenosis and the Stenosis groups (hazard ratio [HR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-2.4; p = 0.52). Even after adjustment for predictive clinical variates, no significant difference in the primary endpoint between the No stenosis and the Stenosis groups was shown (adjusted HR 1.2, 95% CI: 0.59-2.5; p = 0.60). Fifty patients (7.6%) used an antiplatelet with apixaban. Among the Stenosis group patients, the cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was significantly higher among patients treated with an antiplatelet and apixaban (HR 3.5, 95% CI: 1.0-12; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Apixaban monotherapy appears safe for the prevention of further adverse events in the Stenosis group patients similar to the No stenosis group patients. Concomitant use of an antiplatelet might not be favorable in patients with stenosis.

Management of venous thromboembolism in morbidly obese patients: a 10-year review.

Obesity is a known risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) and poses a unique set of challenges in anticoagulation management. We report a 10-year experience of VTE management in morbidly obese patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of VTE presentations to Northern Health, Victoria, Australia, from January 2011 to December 2020, with median follow-up of 44 months. Morbidly obese patients (defined as weighing > 120 kg) were compared to those ≤ 120 kg. Patients with active malignancy were excluded. 194 VTE cases with weight > 120 kg were compared to 2168 cases weighing ≤ 120 kg. Patients > 120 kg were more likely to present with unprovoked VTE (59.3% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and major VTE (74.7% vs. 67.4%, p = 0.028). Overall, patients > 120 kg were more likely to develop VTE recurrence after anticoagulation cessation (7.80 vs. 3.92 per 100-patient-years, HR 1.97, 95%CI 1.29-3.00), while there were no significant differences in major bleeding or 30-day all-cause mortality. There were no significant differences in outcomes in patients > 120 kg treated with warfarin compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), or when comparing those treated with an uncapped (1 mg/kg BD) vs. capped (< 1 mg/kg) enoxaparin dosing regimen. Morbid obesity is associated with increased clot burden at presentation and VTE recurrence following anticoagulation cessation, without significant differences in bleeding compared to those ≤ 120 kg. There were no significant differences in morbidly obese patients' outcomes when treated with warfarin or DOAC, or when treated with an uncapped or capped enoxaparin dosing strategy. Larger randomised controlled trials evaluating the safety of DOACs and different enoxaparin dosing strategies in patients > 120 kg are warranted.

Switching of oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A narrative review.

Approval of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) was an important milestone, providing a wider range of treatment options and creating the possibility for drug switching after initiation. In addition to improved utilisation of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention, reports of switching among OACs are growing in the literature; switching may influence clinical outcomes, healthcare costs and patient satisfaction. This review aimed to summarise the current literature on the pattern of OAC switching in patients with AF, including reasons for switching and clinical consequences following switching. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Embase on 27 June 2020. We included 39 articles published after 2013, following the introduction of apixaban. The review found that switching among OACs was common in clinical practice, significantly varying with the type of OAC. Studies reporting the reason for switching and clinical outcomes were comparatively limited. The decision to switch was often related to safety issues (usually bleeding), poor anticoagulation control and ease of use. Patient characteristics, clinical conditions and drug interactions were found to be associated with switching from OACs. Findings regarding bleeding outcomes following switching were inconsistent, possibly confounded by the rationale for switching and the switching protocol. Noting the limited number of studies included and their relatively short follow-up periods, switching did not have a significant impact on the risk of stroke and other thrombotic outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to understand better potential rationales for switching and the clinical outcomes.

Spontaneous rectus sheath hematoma associated with apixaban in an elderly gentleman with chronic obstructive airway disease - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) is a relatively uncommon cause of acute abdominal pain and can be mistaken as other surgical causes of acute abdomen. A diagnosis requires high index of suspicion especially in susceptible patients, for example, in patients on anticoagulation. While anticoagulation is the commonest risk factor for RSH, direct-acting oral anticoagulants have only been very recently implicated as a potential cause with fewer than ten cases reported in the literature. CASE PRESENTATION: An 82-year-old Chinese man with chronic obstructive airway disease, ischemic heart disease, heart failure and atrial fibrillation on apixaban presenting with acute onset of lower abdominal pain. Physical examination showed peritoneal signs with tenderness and guarding over the lower quadrants with hypotension. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen confirmed a large rectus sheath hematoma (RSH) without active extravasation. He was given fluid resuscitation and was managed successfully with supportive treatment and cessation of apixaban. A follow-up CT two months later showed resolving hematoma and aspirin was resumed primarily for ischemic heart disease. The patient tolerated anti-platelet therapy without recurrence of RSH. The risk factors, treatment options, prognosis and issue related to anticoagulation resumption after an episode of RSH are discussed. Reported cases of RSH associated with direct-acting oral anticoagulants are reviewed. CONCLUSIONS: Direct-acting oral anticoagulant-associated rectus sheath hematoma is rare. With increasing use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in multiple clinical settings, clinicians should remain vigilant of this potentially life-threatening bleeding complication when a patient presents with acute abdominal pain. Conservative treatment with cessation of anti-coagulant and supportive transfusion remains the mainstay of treatment.

Thromboembolic prevention and anticoagulant therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: updated clinical guidance from the anticoagulation forum.

Thromboembolism is a common and deadly consequence of COVID-19 infection for hospitalized patients. Based on clinical evidence pre-dating the COVID-19 pandemic and early observational reports, expert consensus and guidance documents have strongly encouraged the use of prophylactic anticoagulation for patients hospitalized for COVID-19 infection. More recently, multiple clinical trials and larger observational studies have provided evidence for tailoring the approach to thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19. This document provides updated guidance for the use of anticoagulant therapies in patients with COVID-19 from the Anticoagulation Forum, the leading North American organization of anticoagulation providers. We discuss ambulatory, in-hospital, and post-hospital thromboprophylaxis strategies as well as provide guidance for patients with thrombotic conditions who are considering COVID-19 vaccination.

Andexanet alfa versus four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the reversal of apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated intracranial hemorrhages.

BACKGROUND: Existing research recommends either andexanet alfa (AA) or four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) as an antidote for major bleeding events due to apixaban or rivaroxaban. Currently, there is limited published research that directly compares the risks and benefits of the two agents in patients with oral factor Xa inhibitor related traumatic and spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhages. Additional head-to-head data is needed to support favoring either AA or 4F-PCC when it comes to efficacy, safety, and cost. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess patients admitted to a multi-center healthcare system and a stand-alone teaching hospital in central Florida from June 2016 to December 2020. Patients included in the study were at least 18 years of age, taking apixaban or rivaroxaban prior to admission, had radiographical evidence of an intracranial hemorrhage, and received either AA or 4F-PCC as a reversal agent. The primary outcome analyzed was the level of excellent hemostasis achieved, based on a standardized rating system for effective hemostasis defined by the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH), after administration of AA or 4F-PCC. Secondary outcomes analyzed included changes in the initial hemorrhage volume as reported on computed tomography (CT) scan and at 12 to 24 h post treatment, rate of thromboembolic events, rate of inpatient mortality, and total cost of treatment after AA or 4F-PCC administration. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in the study with 47 in the AA group (43.1%) and 62 in the 4F-PCC group (56.9%). There were no statistically significant differences between AA and 4F-PCC in terms of the primary and secondary outcomes with the exception of total cost of treatment. The level of excellent hemostasis achieved after reversal administration of AA was seen in 27 patients (71.1%) and 41 patients (70.7%) after 4F-PCC administration (p = 1, p adjusted = 0.654 after controlling for age, ICH score, regional mass effect, and midline shift). There was no statistically significant difference in the median percentage change in hemorrhagic volume from baseline to 12-24 h after reversal treatment (0 [-0.17--0.24] vs. 0 [-0.021-0.29], p = 0.439, adjusted p = 0.601) in the AA and 4F-PCC groups, respectively. The total incidence of thromboembolic events (4 [8.5%] vs. 6 [9.7%], p = 1, adjusted p = 0.973) and rate of inpatient mortality was similar between the two groups (16 [34.0%] vs. 13 [21.0%], p = 0.134, adjusted p = 0.283). A statistically significant difference was observed with the total cost of reversal treatment: $23,602 for treatment with AA and $6692 for treatment with 4F-PCC. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences were identified in primary or secondary outcomes between the two agents with the exception of total treatment cost. There is insufficient evidence based on this study to recommend AA over 4F-PCC for patients with intracranial hemorrhages associated with the use of apixaban or rivaroxaban.

Effect of direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on bleeding and blood product usage in cardiac surgery compared to warfarin and controls.

In this retrospective, single-centre, observational study, we assessed (i) use of anticoagulant and antiplatelet (AP) therapy, (ii) the duration of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) discontinuation, (iii) renal function and (iv) PT and APTT as predictors of bleeding and blood product usage; in adults (>18 years) undergoing major cardiac surgery from 01.01.2015 to 31.12.2018. Comparisons were made between each treatment group (warfarin, DOAC and DOAC + AP) and untreated controls, and between warfarin and DOAC. A total of 2928 patients were included for analysis. Median (range) of DOAC discontinuation prior to surgery was five days (1-22) for DOAC and five days (2-7) for DOAC + AP. There were no differences in bleeding between anticoagulant groups versus control, or DOAC versus warfarin. There were no differences in blood product use between DOAC and warfarin patients. The duration of DOAC discontinuation but not the creatinine clearance influenced bleeding and blood products use. Thrombosis occurred in 0·7% and 3·1% in controls and patients on warfarin respectively (P = 0·099) with none among patients on DOAC or DOAC + AP. The PT/APTT had no predictive value. Median five-day discontinuation of DOAC +/- AP irrespective of renal function prevents an increase in bleeding compared to patients on warfarin or controls with no increase in thrombosis.

What is the appropriate anticoagulation strategy for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome?

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune prothrombotic disorder mediated by a heterogeneous group of autoantibodies collectively known as antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). They include lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2GPI) antibodies. It has been shown that those patients with all three aPL (triple positive) are at highest risk of both a first thrombotic event and of a recurrence, despite anticoagulation. In response to publication of a meta-analysis and a randomised controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in triple-positive APS with venous and/or arterial thrombosis, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued recommendations that direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOACs) should not be used for secondary prevention of thrombosis in all APS patients (although they did draw specific attention to the high risk of triple-positive patients). As there is less evidence for patients with single- or dual-positive patients with APS, this may be an over-interpretation of the data. In this review, we explore the available evidence on safety and efficacy of DOACs in thrombotic APS, the problem of detecting LA while on DOAC, and provide some practical guidance for managing this problem.

Trends in oral anticoagulant co-prescription with antiepileptic drugs among adults with epilepsy, 2010-2018.

Treatment considerations for epilepsy patients requiring anticoagulation are changing, and actual prescribing practices have not been characterized. We used the 2010-2018 Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart Database to estimate the annual prevalence and distinguish the patterns of oral anticoagulants (OACs) co-dispensed with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) among adults with epilepsy. Monotonic trends were assessed using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (ρ). Multivariable logistic regression models were built to evaluate the associations of sociodemographic characteristics. Among 345,892 adults with epilepsy (56.5% female; median age 61, IQR 46-74) on studied AEDs, the prevalence per thousand of concurrent OACs increased from 58.4 in 2010 to 92.0 in 2018 (OR 1.63, CI 1.58-1.69). Direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) use rapidly increased from 2010 to 2018 (ρ = 1.00; P < 0.001), with a corresponding decrease in warfarin use (ρ = -0.97; P < 0.001). Among OAC/AED dispensings in 2018, warfarin was more likely to be co-dispensed with potentially interacting, enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EI-AEDs) versus presumably non-interacting, non-enzyme inducing antiepileptic drugs (OR 1.48, CI 1.38-1.59). Characteristics independently associated with concurrent OAC/EI-AED use included younger age, female sex, white race, net worth <$250 K, and lower education levels. Our findings demonstrate the expanding use and evolving patterns of OAC/AED co-dispensing, and ensuing critical need to further understanding regarding postulated interactions.

Low persistence to rivaroxaban or warfarin among patients with new venous thromboembolism at a safety net academic medical center.

Recent guidelines recommend direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over vitamin-k antagonist (VKA) for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Non-adherence to anticoagulation has been associated with increased frequency of VTE or stroke. This study evaluated 90 day persistence among patients prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin for the treatment of acute VTE at an academic safety net hospital. We conducted a single center, retrospective cohort study of 314 consecutive patients newly prescribed rivaroxaban or warfarin for acute VTE between January 2016 and July 2017. Primary outcome was 90 day persistence, and secondary outcomes included 90 day readmission and/or ED visit, time to 90 m day readmission and/or ED visits, and attendance of direct oral anticoagulant education class. Of 314 patients, 78 were prescribed warfarin and 236 rivaroxaban. Patients had a mean age of 52 years, 62% were men, and 96% were diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Persistence at 90 days was 52.6% among patients prescribed warfarin compared to 45.3% for patients prescribed rivaroxaban (p = 0.2678). Persistencewas associated with decreased 90 day hospital or ED readmission. Among patients prescribed rivaroxaban, attending a pharmacist led educational class was associated with a 2.5 fold increase in persistence (p < 0.0001). Among patients with new onset venous thromboembolism, 90 day persistence with anticoagulation was similarly low with either rivaroxaban or warfarin therapy. Participation in a pharmacist led DOAC class was associated with a 2.5-fold increase in persistence on rivaroxaban.

Effect of preoperative antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy on hemorrhagic complications in patients with traumatic brain injury undergoing craniotomy or craniectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common among the elderly, often treated with antiplatelet (AP) or anticoagulation (AC) therapy, creating new challenges in neurosurgery. In contrast to elective craniotomy, in which AP/AC therapy is mostly discontinued, in TBI usually no delay in treatment can be afforded. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of AP/AC therapy on postoperative bleeding after craniotomy/craniectomy in TBI. METHODS: Postoperative bleeding rates in patients treated with AP/AC therapy (blood thinner group) and in those without AP/AC therapy (control group) were retrospectively compared. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for postoperative bleeding. Lastly, a proportional Cox regression analysis comparing postoperative bleeding events within 14 days in both groups was performed. RESULTS: Of 143 consecutive patients undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy for TBI between 2012 and 2017, 47 (32.9%) were under AP/AC treatment. No significant difference for bleeding events was observed in univariate (40.4% blood thinner group vs 36.5% control group; p = 0.71) or Cox proportional regression analysis (log rank χ2 = 0.29, p = 0.59). Patients with postoperative bleeding showed a significantly higher mortality rate (p = 0.035). In the univariate analysis, hemispheric lesion, acute subdural hematoma, hematological disease, greater extent of midline shift, and pupillary difference were significantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative bleeding. However, in the multivariate regression analysis none of these factors showed a significant association with postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with AP/AC therapy undergoing craniotomy/craniectomy due to TBI do not appear to have increased rates of postoperative bleeding. Once postoperative bleeding occurs, mortality rates rise significantly.

Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Venous Thromboembolism with Factor Xa Inhibitors in Severely Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: A paucity of data exists to support the use of factor Xa inhibitors in severely obese patients with a weight ≥ 150kg or BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether factor Xa inhibitors are as safe and effective as warfarin for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or venous thromboembolism (VTE) in individuals with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 and/or weight ≥ 150 kg. PATIENTS / METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study of severely obese adult patients with AF and/or VTE treated with a factor Xa inhibitor or warfarin. The primary effectiveness outcome was a composite odds of stroke, systemic embolism or VTE; the primary safety outcome was odds of major bleeding. Secondary outcomes included incidence of stroke or systemic embolism, VTE, major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding, all-cause mortality, change in anticoagulation and total number of hospital encounters. Outcomes were assessed for 12 months following initiation of study drug. RESULTS: A total of 1,736 patients were included. The mean weight and BMI of the overall cohort was 164.4 kg and 54.6 kg/m2, respectively. There was no difference in odds of stroke, systemic embolism or VTE (OR 1.005, 95% CI 0.6 - 1.68) or major bleeding (OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.47 - 1.7) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that apixaban and rivaroxaban are safe and effective alternatives to warfarin for the treatment of AF and/or VTE in individuals with a BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2 and/or weight ≥ 150 kg.

A Case of Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulant-Induced Intramural Colon Hematoma Successfully Treated by Laparoscopic Surgery.

Intramural intestinal hematoma is a rare disease, one of the triggering factors of which is the use of anticoagulants. In previous reports, most patients were on treatment with warfarin. Herein, we report a case of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC)-induced intramural hematoma of the ascending colon in a patient refractory to conservative treatment and required laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. An 80-year-old male patient with a history of atrial fibrillation and cerebral infarction, on treatment with apixaban, was brought to our hospital with the chief complaints of abdominal pain, vomiting, and melena. Imaging revealed the cause of symptoms to be intestinal obstruction caused by a mass lesion on the wall of the ascending colon. We initially opted for conservative treatment with discontinuation of apixaban and insertion of an ileus tube. Intestinal dilatation findings showed improvement; however, subsequent imaging examinations did not reveal the shrinkage of a lesion in the ascending colon. If the mass was not removed, recurrence of bowel obstruction symptoms was expected, so we decided to perform surgical intervention. A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy was performed, and an intramural hematoma of the ascending colon was diagnosed based on the excised specimen. He needed a blood transfusion for anemia but was discharged on postoperative day 14 with no other complications. DOACs are now widely used in patients with atrial fibrillation, and the risk of bleeding as a side effect is extremely low compared to conventional anticoagulants, including warfarin. However, when abdominal pain occurs, as in the present case, an intramural hematoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis. There is no established treatment plan for intestinal intramural hematoma. Although conservative treatment is effective in some cases, it is difficult to evaluate the risk of bleeding associated with DOACs using coagulation tests. Even if conservative treatment is selected, it is essential to determine surgical resection, if necessary, based on the clinical course and imaging and blood test findings.

The Safety and Effectiveness of Apixaban in Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease on Dialysis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Background: Apixaban has been increasingly utilized for various FDA-approved indications, including stroke prevention and venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment in patients with end stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis. However, the safety and efficacy of its use in this population is not well established. Hence, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apixaban by examining outcomes in this population. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study that involved adults with ESKD who were on hemodialysis and prescribed apixaban from our hospital's outpatient pharmacy between 1 May 2015, and 31 March 2022. Demographics, apixaban indications, dose appropriateness, concomitant antiplatelet use, and comorbidities data were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic events were also collected. Results: Sixty-six patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 50% of them males. Median age was 71 (63.5-82) years, and the median BMI 28.2 (59.5-86.25) kg/m2. The median follow-up time was 5 (1.9-12.3) months. Concomitant antiplatelet use (39.4%) and high medication adherence (84.8%) were observed. During follow-up, major bleeding events occurred in 15.2% of cases, with minor bleeding being more common (36.4%), and VTE and stroke events occurred in 4.5% of cases; appropriate dosing was prevalent (62.1%), and there was an overall all-cause mortality rate of 34.8%. Most patients received a 2.5 mg BID apixaban dose (56.1%), including both NVAF and VTE groups. Notably, the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that weight, and daily dose were insignificant predictors of bleeding events (p = 0.104, 0.591), however, the BMI was the main independent risk factor for bleeding in this population [OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.8-0.99; p = 0.023]. Conclusions: Our analysis of apixaban-treated ESKD patients highlights that the risk of bleeding is significant, and BMI was the main independent risk factor. A larger prospective study is needed to confirm our findings.

Incidence and Predictors of Worsening Renal Function in Edoxaban-Treated Atrial Fibrillation Patients Within ETNA-AF-Europe Registry.

Background: Managing patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and worsening renal function (WRF) remains a clinical challenge due to the need of dose adjustment of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Objectives: To determine the incidence of WRF in patients with AF treated with edoxaban, the association of WRF with clinical outcomes, and predictors of WRF and clinical outcomes in these patients. Methods: This is a subanalysis of the Edoxaban Treatment in routiNe clinical prActice for patients with non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Europe study (NCT02944019), an observational study of edoxaban-treated patients with AF. WRF was defined as a ≥25% reduction in creatinine clearance between baseline and 2 years. Results: Of the 9,054 patients included (69% of the total 13,133 enrolled), most did not experience WRF (90.3%) during the first 2 years of follow-up. WRF occurred in 9.7% of patients. Patients with WRF had significantly higher rates of all-cause death (3.88%/y vs 1.88%/y; P < 0.0001), cardiovascular death (2.09%/y vs 0.92%/y; P < 0.0001), and major bleeding (1.51%/y vs 0.98%/y; P = 0.0463) compared with those without WRF. Rates of intracranial hemorrhage (0.18%/y vs 0.18%/y) and of any stroke/systemic embolic events were low (0.90%/y vs 0.69%/y; P = 0.3161) in both subgroups. The strongest predictors of WRF were a high CHA2DS2-VASc score, high baseline creatinine clearance, low body weight, and older age. Most predictors of WRF were also predictors of clinical outcomes. Conclusions: WRF occurred in approximately 10% of edoxaban-treated AF patients. Rates of death and major bleeding were significantly higher in patients with WRF than without. Stroke events were low in both subgroups.

Adherence and persistence to direct factor Xa inhibitors in the community following newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism: a retrospective pharmacy-linkage study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess adherence and persistence to the direct factor Xa inhibitor oral anticoagulants in the community following newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed community pharmacy dispensing data on all patients with newly diagnosed VTE who were prescribed direct factor Xa inhibitors, apixaban or rivaroxaban, between January 2018 and December 2019 at our institution. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was used to assess adherence at 90 days, and 6- and 12 months. Persistence was measured by participants having both dispensed supply of a factor Xa inhibitor at the end of the treatment period and no significant gaps (maximum of 60 days) in supply. KEY FINDINGS: There were 225 patients identified. Overall PDC at 90 days, 6- and 12 months were 84.6%, 86.2% and 86.1%, respectively. Apixaban had a higher mean overall PDC than rivaroxaban (86.2% and 80.6%, respectively). Females demonstrated higher PDC compared with males (87.3% versus 81.2%). Overall, 133 patients (64%) were persistent with therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with newly diagnosed VTE treated with a factor Xa inhibitor, adherence rates are high at >80%, with females and those prescribed apixaban exhibiting higher adherence. These findings may assist clinicians in identifying those patients with VTE at risk of poor adherence.

Anticoagulation Changes Following Major and Clinically Relevant Nonmajor Bleeding Events in Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

Background: Bleeding events are common complications of oral anticoagulant drugs, including both warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Some patients have their anticoagulant changed or discontinued after experiencing a bleeding event, while others continue the same treatment. Differences in anticoagulation management between warfarin- and DOAC-treated patients following a bleeding event are unknown. Methods: Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from six anticoagulation clinics taking warfarin or DOAC therapy who experienced an International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)-defined major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding event were identified between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcome was management of the anticoagulant following bleeding (discontinuation, change in drug class, and restarting of same drug class). DOAC- and warfarin-treated patients were propensity matched based on the individual elements of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores as well as the severity of the bleeding event. Results: Of the 509 patients on warfarin therapy and 246 on DOAC therapy who experienced a major or CRNM bleeding event, the majority of patients continued anticoagulation therapy. The majority of warfarin (231, 62.6%) and DOAC patients (201, 81.7%) restarted their previous anticoagulation. Conclusion: Following a bleeding event, most patients restarted anticoagulation therapy, most often with the same type of anticoagulant that they previously had been taking.