RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify whether men aged ≥40 years with bladder stones (BS) benefit from treatment of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A regional, retrospective study of patients undergoing BS surgery between January 2011 and December 2018 was performed using a prospectively collected database. The primary outcome was BS recurrence after successful removal. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared statistical tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 174 patients underwent BS removal and 71 (40.8%) were excluded due to BS formation secondary to causes other than BPO. Hence, 103 men aged ≥40 years had BS successfully removed, of which 40% had a history of upper tract urolithiasis. These men were divided into three groups: those undergoing contemporaneous medical, surgical, or no BPO treatment. Age, diabetes, previous urolithiasis and previous BPO surgery were well matched between the BPO treatment groups. In all, 18 of these men (17%) had BS recurrence after 46 months follow-up. Recurrences were significantly lower following BPO surgery; one of 34 (3%) men versus five of 28 (18%) with no BPO treatment (P = 0.048) and 12 of 41 (29%) with medical BPO treatment (P = 0.003). Recurrences after medical and no BPO treatment were similar (P = 0.280). In all, 34 men (33%) had BPO complications that were similar between groups (P = 0.378). CONCLUSION: This is the largest reported cohort of men, with the longest follow-up after BS removal. Most men aged ≥40 years with BS benefit from BPO surgery. However, the study findings also support a multifactorial aetiology for BS, which questions the dogma that BS are an 'absolute indication' for BPO surgery, as is stated in the Non-neurogenic Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms European Association of Urology Guideline. Assessment and management of all causative factors is likely to enable selection of which men will benefit from BPO surgery and to reduce BS recurrence rates.
Assuntos
Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior , Hiperplasia Prostática , Obstrução Uretral , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicações , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Cálculos da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/etiologia , Obstrução do Colo da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/etiologia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/cirurgia , Sintomas do Trato Urinário Inferior/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the context of established male hypogonadism, testosterone therapy (TTh) has been employed to regain physiologic levels of circulating testosterone and improve sexual function and overall quality of life. AIM: To assess the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality as time-dependent outcomes in treated vs TTh untreated hypogonadal men. METHODS: A meta-analysis using weighted time-related measure of risk (hazard ratios (HRs)) for each of the outcome for all included studies was performed. Studies investigating male adults (≥18 years old) diagnosed with hypogonadism and divided into 2 arms (a treatment arm [any TTh] and a control arm [observation or placebo]) and assessing the risk of death and/or cardiovascular events were included. Single arm, non-comparative studies were excluded as well as studies that did not report the HRs for the chosen outcomes. This systemic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022301592) and performed according to MOOSE and PRISMA guidelines. OUTCOMES: Overall mortality and cardiovascular events of any type. RESULTS: Overall, 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 179,631 hypogonadal men. Hypogonadal men treated with TTh were found to be at lower mortality risk from all causes relative to the control (observation or palcebo) arm (HR: 0.70; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.54-0.90; P < .01), whilst any unfavorable effect of TTh in hypogonadal men in terms of cardiovascular events compared to untreated/observed hypogonadal men was found (HR: 0.98; 95% CI 0.73-1.33; P = .89). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: TTh in hypogonadal men might play a role in reducing the overall risk of death without increasing cardiovascular events risk. STRENGTHS & LIMITATION: Main limitations are represented by the high heterogeneity among the studies in terms of included population, definition for hypogonadism, type of TTh, definition of cardio-vascular event used, and the length of follow-up. CONCLUSION: According to time-related measures of risk only, an increased risk of long-term morbidity and early mortality for untreated hypogonadal men was depicted, further outlining the clinical importance and safety of TTh in true hypogonadal men, with the urgent need of collecting long-term follow-up data. Fallara G, Pozzi E, Belladelli F, et al. Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Men - Findings From a Meta-analysis on the Time-related Measure of Risk of Exogenous Testosterone. J Sex Med 2022;19:1243-1254.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal , Testosterona , Adulto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/mortalidade , Terapia de Reposição Hormonal/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Hipogonadismo/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Testosterona/efeitos adversos , Testosterona/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To conduct a rigorous assessment of in-hospital morbidity after urethroplasty according with the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for complication reporting. METHODS: We retrospectively (2015-2019) identified 469 consecutive patients receiving urethroplasty (e.g. bulbar urethroplasty with grafts, penile urethroplasty with/without grafts/flaps, Johanson, de novo or revision perineostomy, end-to-end anastomosis, meatoplasty and/or meatotomy) at our tertiary care institution. Complications were graded with Clavien-Dindo score and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI). Complications were classified in: bleeding no gastrointestinal, cardiac, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, infectious, neurological, oral, wound, miscellaneous, and pulmonary. Logistic regression tested for predictors of in-hospital complications and prolonged hospitalization (> 75th percentile). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression investigated the effect of complications on failure after urethroplasty. RESULTS: Overall, 161 (34.3%) patients experienced at least one complication. Of those, 47 (10%) experienced two or more complications and 59 (12.6%) experienced at least one Clavien-Dindo ≥ II complication. Only two patients had Clavien-Dindo III complications. Infectious was the most frequent complication, and de novo or revision perineostomy was associated with the highest rate of complications. The occurrence of any complications, as well as complication with Clavien-Dindo ≥ II were associated with prolonged hospitalizations, but not with higher rates of post-urethroplasty failure. CONCLUSIONS: Complications after urethroplasty were common events, but rarely with severe sequelae. Infectious were the most common complications and perineostomy was the type of urethroplasty with the highest rate of complications. The application of the EAU recommendations allowed the identifications of a higher number of complications after urethroplasty if compared with previous reports based on unsupervised chart review.
Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estreitamento Uretral/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Kalanchoe , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Períneo/cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess European Association of Urology guideline adherence on the surgical management of patients with T1 renal tumours and the effects of centralisation of care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective data from all kidney tumours that underwent radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) in the period 2012-2016 from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Nephrectomy Audit were retrieved and analysed. We assessed total surgical hospital volume (HV; RN and PN performed) per centre, PN rates, complication rates, and completeness of data. Descriptive analyses were performed, and confidence intervals were used to illustrate the association between hospital volume and proportion of PN. Chi- squared and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to evaluate differences and trends. RESULTS: In total, 13 045 surgically treated T1 tumours were included in the analyses. Over time, there was an increase in PN use (39.7% in 2012 to 44.9% in 2016). Registration of the Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) complexity score was included in March 2016 and documented in 39% of cases. Missing information on postoperative complications appeared constant over the years (8.5-9%). A clear association was found between annual HV and the proportion of T1 tumours treated with PN rather than RN (from 18.1% in centres performing <25 cases/year [lowest volume] to 61.8% in centres performing ≥100 cases/year [high volume]), which persisted after adjustment for PADUA complexity. Overall and major (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) complication rate decreased with increasing HV (from 12.2% and 2.9% in low-volume centres to 10.7% and 2.2% in high-volume centres, respectively), for all patients including those treated with PN. CONCLUSION: Closer guideline adherence was exhibited by higher surgical volume centres. Treatment of T1 tumours using PN increased with increasing HV, and was accompanied by an inverse association of HV with complication rate. These results support the centralisation of kidney cancer specialist cancer surgical services to improve patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais com Alto Volume de Atendimentos , Hospitais com Baixo Volume de Atendimentos , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Correlação de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Auditoria Médica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nefrectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Reino Unido , UrologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To audit the management and outcome of penile cancer in a tertiary university teaching hospital, comparing our results to international best practice and published guidelines. METHODS: The Hospital Inpatient Enquiry database of the Mercy University Hospital was interrogated for penile cancer patients treated between 2001 and 2012. Data relating to presentation, local treatment, histology, lymph-node management, outcome and survival was recorded. Data were analysed using the Log Rank test, with significance defined as P ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were identified with a median age of 61 years. The majority of cases at presentation were ≥ T2 (54%) and intermediate to high grade (76%). The median follow-up of patients was 3.75 years (range 9 months-10 years). Overall survival was 76% (n = 19), these patients are all disease free to date. Disease-specific survival was 85% at 10 years. Penile cancer related mortality was 8% (n = 2), 4 patients (16%) died of non-penile cancer related causes. Twenty-two patients (88%) had surgery and 3 patients (12%) had radiotherapy. Based on EAU guidelines inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) was performed in 64% (n = 16) of cases with 44% (n = 7) of these patients requiring concurrent bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Fifty percent (n = 8) of ILNDs showed metastatic disease. Ten year disease-specific survival for node negative versus node positive disease is 100% versus 57%. Thirty-two percent (n = 8) of patients received chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Penile cancer is a rare oncological condition that often requires bilateral inguinal ± pelvic lymph node dissection and should be managed according to published guidelines, in specialist centres in order to maximize outcomes.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Excisão de Linfonodo , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Neoplasias Penianas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Virilha , Hospitais Universitários/normas , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Pelve , Estudos Retrospectivos , Centros de Atenção Terciária/normasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recurrent pregnancy loss and unexplained infertility are the current indications to test sperm DNA fragmentation according to the European Association of Urology Guidelines on sexual and reproductive health. OBJECTIVE: To identify a novel and better performing model to diagnose primary infertile men presenting with altered sperm DNA fragmentation and to outline its predictive ability in respect to current European Association of Urology Guidelines' recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the latest 515 consecutive primary infertile men as for World Health Organization criteria were analyzed. Semen analysis, sperm DNA fragmentation (according to sperm chromatin structure assay), and serum hormones were considered in every patient. Altered sperm DNA fragmentation was defined with levels greater than 30%. Descriptive statistics was applied to compare patients with normal versus SDF > 30%. The new predicting model was identified through logistic regression analysis exploring potential predictors of SDF > 30% at first clinical presentation. Diagnostic accuracy between the two predictive models (European Association of Urology Guidelines vs. new) was assessed, and decision curve analyses tested their clinical benefit. RESULTS: Of 515, 268 (51.9%) patients had SDF > 30% at clinical presentation. Patients with SDF > 30% were older (median [interquartile range] 39 [35-43] vs. 37 [34-41] years), had lower mean testicular volume (Prader 15 [12-20] vs. 17.5 [13.5-20] and lower total motile sperm count (1.80 [0.7-13.2] vs. 11.82 [4.2-44.5] × 106 ), all p < 0.001. No other clinical differences were depicted. The two groups showed similar rates of history of recurrent pregnancy loss and unexplained infertility. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, age more than 38 years (odds ratio: 2.43) and baseline total motile sperm count less than 20 × 106 (odds ratio: 3.72) were associated with SDF > 30%, after adjusting for Prader < 15, history of miscarriages and unexplained infertility, all p < 0.0001. The newly identified model (unexplained infertility + history of poli-abortions + Prader < 15 + age ≥38 years + total motile sperm count <20 × 106 ) showed higher accuracy to identify SDF > 30% at baseline in respect to European Association of Urology Guidelines (area under the curve: 72.1 vs. 52.7), with superior clinical net benefit use. CONCLUSIONS: The application of the European Association of Urology sexual and reproductive health guidelines does not ensure proper identification of primary infertile men with pathological sperm DNA fragmentation. We propose a novel and better performing predictive model to identify the infertile men with altered sperm DNA fragmentation at first clinical assessment. DISCUSSION: As altered sperm DNA fragmentation has been widely linked with the inability to conceive, this second-level test could be further implemented over the diagnostic workup of a broader subset of patients presenting for male factor infertility. We propose a better performing model to identify this specific category of patients.
Assuntos
Aborto Habitual , Infertilidade Masculina , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides , Espermatozoides , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez , Aborto Habitual/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Fragmentação do DNA , Infertilidade Masculina/diagnóstico , Infertilidade Masculina/genética , Infertilidade Masculina/patologia , Sêmen , Contagem de Espermatozoides , Motilidade dos Espermatozoides/genética , Espermatozoides/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Radical cystectomy (RC) in bladder cancer patients with cardiovascular comorbidity poses challenges due to the need for antithrombotic therapy and high perioperative risk. We aimed to assess 30-day complications after RC in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 416 bladder cancer patients (2009-2017) undergoing open RC with pelvic lymph node dissection, with or without antithrombotic therapy. Antithrombotic therapy and complication reporting followed European guidelines. Procedure-specific 30-day complications were cataloged, graded (Clavien-Dindo), and quantified using the 30-day Comprehensive Complication Index. Multivariable regressions evaluated antithrombotic therapy's independent effect on key morbidity outcomes. RESULTS: Median age was 70 years, 78% were male. Patients on antithrombotic therapy were mostly male, had higher comorbidity burden, worse kidney function, more frequent incontinent diversion, and shorter operative time (all p ≤ 0.027). Bleeding complications occurred in 135 patients (32%; 95%CI = 28-37%), more prevalent with antithrombotic therapy (46% vs. 29%; p = 0.004). Thromboembolic complications occurred in 18 patients (4.3%; 95%CI = 2.6-6.8%), no difference between patients with and without antithrombotic therapy (8.4% vs. 3.3%; p = 0.063). Prevalence of myocardial infarction, new-onset hypertension, acute congestive heart failure, and angina pectoris showed no difference (all p ≥ 0.3). Multivariable analyses indicated no association between antithrombotic therapy and cardiac complications, 30-day major complications, or cumulative morbidity (all p ≥ 0.2). Antithrombotic therapy was associated with bleeding complications (OR = 1.92; 95%CI = 1.07-3.45; p = 0.028), predominantly transfusion-related (75% of 152 bleeding complications). Limitations include retrospective data assessment with biases. CONCLUSIONS: RC in patients on antithrombotic therapy exhibits a higher incidence of adverse events due to underlying comorbidities. Adherence to thromboprophylaxis guidelines enables safe RC in patients with significant comorbidities, without substantial increase in major bleeding or severe thromboembolic events.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Urologia , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Feminino , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/complicações , MorbidadeRESUMO
Objectives: Lack of assessment of 90-d perioperative morbidity in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) using a standard reporting methodology, and the Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) does not accurately reflect the burden of complications. We aim to report the 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy, and to compare the validity of the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and CDC. Methods: Retrospective review of 280 patients aged ≥75 years who received radical cystectomy between 2006 and 2021. The 90-d complications of elderly patients after radical cystectomy were reported by implementing the EAU criteria. The CDC and CCI were both used for grading complications. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate the correlation between postoperative stay and CDC/CCI. Logistic regression was used to identify the risk factors for major complications. The sample size for a fictive superiority trial was calculated for different endpoints. Results: A total of 225 (80.36%) patients suffered from 528 complications. The cumulative CCI had a more accurate prediction of postoperative stay than the CDC (r = 0.378, p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.349, p < 0.001). The need for sample size could decrease when CCI was used for the primary endpoint. More risk factors for major complications were identified when CCI ≥33.7 was defined as the endpoint of major complications. Conclusion: CCI is better than CDC for grading the severity of complications in elderly patients after radical cystectomy and PLND.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction aetiology has been historically identified as organic, psychogenic and mixed. OBJECTIVES: To stratify and compare a cohort of patients seeking medical help for erectile dysfunction for the first time according to the newly proposed binary classification of the European Association of Urology guidelines: 'primary organic' versus 'primary psychogenic'. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Complete data from 2009 consecutive patients presenting for erectile dysfunction were analysed. All patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function at baseline. According to the presence of erectile dysfunction-related risk factors indexed by the European Association of Urology Guidelines on Sexual and Reproductive Health, patients were categorised as having primary organic (≥1 risk factor) or primary psychogenic (0 risk factor) erectile dysfunction. Descriptive statistics compared the two groups. Linear regression analysis tested the association between the number of risk factors and erectile dysfunction severity. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing method graphically explored the relationship between the number of risk factors for erectile dysfunction and the International Index of Erectile Function domain scores. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) age at first presentation was 50 (39-61) years. Of all, 1632 (86.2%) and 377 (13.8%) were identified as having primary organic and primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction, respectively. Overall, 1488 (74.1%) patients were >40 years of age; in this subgroup, the most frequent risk factors were age, hypertension (29%), active smoking (42%) and alcohol intake (25.1%). Median (interquartile range) International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function score was 15 (7-22). Primary organic erectile dysfunction patients depicted lower International Index of Erectile Function-sexual desire and International Index of Erectile Function-orgasmic function scores (all p ≤ 0.02), whilst groups did not differ in terms of International Index of Erectile Function-erectile function, International Index of Erectile Function-intercourse satisfaction and International Index of Erectile Function-overall satisfaction scores. DISCUSSION: One out of nine patients complaining of erectile dysfunction depict criteria for primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Erectile function severity could be as severe as patients with organic erectile dysfunction. The single-centre-based cross-sectional nature of the study, raising the possibility of selection biases, is our main limitation. CONCLUSIONS: One out of nine patients presenting for erectile dysfunction depict criteria suggestive for primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction in the real-life setting. Patients with primary psychogenic and primary organic erectile dysfunction have comparable erectile dysfunction severity, thus outlining the importance of a comprehensive and tailored management work-up in every patient seeking medical help for the first time.
Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil , Estudos Transversais , Disfunção Erétil/complicações , Humanos , Libido , Masculino , Ereção Peniana , Comportamento SexualRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The use of organ sparing strategies to treat penile cancer (PC) is currently supported by evidence that has indicated the safety, efficacy and benefit of this surgery. However, radical penectomy still represents up to 15-20% of primary tumor treatments in PC patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of radical penectomy in PC patients. METHODS: Data from a retrospective multicenter study (PEnile Cancer ADherence study, PECAD Study) on PC patients treated at 13 European and American urological centers (Hospital "Sant'Andrea", Sapienza University, Roma, Italy; "G.D'Annunzio" University, Chieti and ASL 2 Abruzzo, Hospital "S. Pio da Pietrelcina", Vasto, Italy; Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Hospital of Budapest, Hungary; Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology and Andrology Unit II, University of Bari, Italy; Hospital "Spedali Civili", Brescia, Italy; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Ceara Cancer Institute, Fortaleza, Brazil; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA; Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece; Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Warsaw, Poland) between 2010 and 2016 were used. Medical records of patients who specifically underwent radical penectomy were reviewed to identify main clinical and pathological variables. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate 1- and 5-year OS and DFS. RESULTS: Of the entire cohort of 425 patients, 72 patients (16.9%) treated with radical penectomy were extracted and were considered for the analysis. The median age was 64.5 (IQR, 57.5-73.2) years. Of all, 41 (56.9%) patients had pT3/pT4 and 31 (43.1%) pT1/pT2. Moreover, 36 (50.0%) were classified as pN1-3 and 5 (6.9%) M1. Furthermore, 61 (84.7%) had a high grade (G2-G3) with 6 (8.3%) positive surgical margins. The 1- and 5-year OS rates were respectively 73.3% and 59.9%, while the 1- and 5-year DFS rates were respectively 67.3% and 35.1%. CONCLUSIONS: PC is an aggressive cancer particularly in more advanced stage. Overall, more than a third of patients do not survive at 5 years and more than 60% report a disease recurrence, despite the use of a radical treatment.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines for penile cancer (PC) are exclusively based on retrospective studies and have low grades of recommendation. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence to guidelines by investigating the management strategies for primary tumours and inguinal lymph nodes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts of 176 PC patients who underwent surgery in eight European centres from 2010 to 2016. The stage and grade were assessed according to the 2009 AJCC-UICC TNM classification system. To assess adherence rates, we compared theoretical and practical adherence to the EAU guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 176 patients were enrolled. Partial amputation was the most frequent surgical approach (39%). 53.7% of tumours were stage Tis-T1b and the remaining 46.3% were stage T2-T4. Palpable lymph nodes were detected in 30.1% of patients and 45.1% underwent lymphadenectomy (LY). A sizeable group of tumours (43.2%) were N0. For primary treatment, adherence to the EAU guidelines was good (66%). In non-adherent cases, reasons for discrepancy were patient's choice (17%), surgeon's preference (36%), and other causes (47%). For LY, the guideline adherence was 70%, with either patient's or surgeon's choice or other causes accounting for discrepancy in 28, 20, and 52% of non-adherent cases, respectively. CONCLUSION: Adherence to the EAU guidelines for PC was quite high across the eight European centres involved in the study. This notwithstanding, strategies for further improvement should be developed and evenly adopted.
Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Neoplasias Penianas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/normas , Idoso , Amputação Cirúrgica/métodos , Amputação Cirúrgica/normas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirurgia , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodosRESUMO
CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology (EAU) panel on renal transplantation (RT) has released an updated version of the RT guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To present the 2018 EAU guidelines on RT. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A broad and comprehensive scoping exercise was performed, encompassing all areas of RT guidelines published between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2016. Databases covered by the search included Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Libraries. Previous guidelines were updated, and levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were assigned. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: It is strongly recommended to offer pure or hand-assisted laparoscopic/retroperitoneoscopic surgery as the preferential technique for living donor nephrectomy. Decisions on the acceptance of a donor organ should not be based on histological findings alone since this might lead to an unnecessarily high rate of discarded grafts. For ureterovesical anastomosis, a Lich-Gregoir-like extravesical technique protected by a ureteral stent is the preferred technique for minimisation of urinary tract complications. It is also strongly recommended to perform initial rejection prophylaxis with a combination therapy comprising a calcineurin inhibitor (preferably tacrolimus), mycophenolate, steroids, and an induction agent (either basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin). The long version of the guidelines is available at the EAU website (http://uroweb.org/guidelines). CONCLUSIONS: These abridged EAU guidelines present updated information on the clinical and surgical management of RT for incorporation into clinical practice. PATIENT SUMMARY: The European Association of Urology has released the renal transplantation guidelines. The implementation of minimally invasive surgery for organ retrieval and the latest evidence on transplant surgery as well as on immunosuppressive regimens are key factors for minimisation of rejection and achievement of long-term graft survival.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia Assistida com a Mão/normas , Transplante de Rim/métodos , Rim/cirurgia , Urologia/organização & administração , Anastomose Cirúrgica , Biópsia/métodos , Biópsia/tendências , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Rim/patologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Rim/normas , Doadores Vivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Nefrectomia/métodos , Preservação de Órgãos/normas , Stents/normasRESUMO
Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has been the standard of care in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cancer who present with the tumour in place. The CARMENA trial compared systemic therapy alone with CN followed by systemic therapy. This article outlines the new guidelines based on these data. PATIENT SUMMARY: The CARMENA trial demonstrates that immediate cytoreductive nephrectomy should no longer be considered the standard of care in patients diagnosed with intermediate and poor risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma when medical treatment is required. However, the psychological burden poor risk patients experience hearing that removal of their primary tumour will not be beneficial, should be carefully considered.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/normas , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgia , Nefrectomia/normas , Urologia/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto/normas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Técnica Delphi , Estudos de Equivalência como Asunto , Europa (Continente) , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/patologia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Seleção de Pacientes , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The rate of postoperative complications might vary according to the method used to collect perioperative data. We aimed at assessing the impact of the prospective implementation of the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on reporting and grading of complications in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). From September 2016, an integrated method for reporting surgical morbidity based on the EAU guidelines was implemented at a single, tertiary center. Perioperative data were prospectively and systematically collected during a patient interview at 30 d after surgery as recommended by the EAU Guidelines Panel Recommendations on Reporting and Grading Complications. The rate and grading of complications of 167 patients who underwent RARP±pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) after the implementation of the prospective collection system (Group 1) were compared with 316 patients treated between January 2015 and August 2016 (Group 2) when a system based on patient chart review was used. No differences were observed in disease characteristics and PLND between the two groups (all p≥0.1). Postoperative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Overall, the complication rate was higher when the prospective collection system based on the EAU guidelines was used (29%) than when retrospective chart review (10%; p<0.001) was used. In particular, a substantially higher rate of grade 1 (8.4% vs 4.7%) and 2 (14% vs 2.8%) complications was detected in Group 1 versus Group 2 (p<0.001). Although the rate of complications occurred during hospitalization did not differ (13% vs 10%; p=0.3), 31 (19%) complications after discharge were detected in Group 1. This resulted into a readmission rate of 16%. Conversely, no complications after discharge and readmissions were recorded for Group 2. The implementation of the EAU guidelines on reporting perioperative outcomes roughly doubled the complication rate after RARP and allowed for the detection of complications after discharge in more than 15% of patients that would have been otherwise missed, where patients assessed with the EAU implemented protocol had a threefold higher likelihood of reporting complications. PATIENT SUMMARY: The implementation of the European Association of Urology guidelines on reporting and grading of complications after urologic procedures in prostate cancer patients roughly doubled the complication rate after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared to retrospective patient chart review. Moreover, it allowed for the detection of complications after discharge in more than 15% of patients that would have been otherwise missed.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/normas , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/normas , Idoso , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , Urologia/normas , Urologia/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
CONTEXT: The European Association of Urology guidelines on urinary incontinence (UI) have been updated in cyclical fashion with successive major chapters being revised each year. The sections on assessment, diagnosis, and nonsurgical treatment have been updated as of mid-2016. OBJECTIVE: We present a condensed version of the full guideline on assessment and nonsurgical management of UI, with the aim of improving accessibility and increasing their dissemination. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Our literature search was updated from the previous cut-off of July 2010 up to April 2016. Evidence synthesis was carried out by a pragmatic review of current systematic reviews and any newer subsequent high-quality studies, based on Population, Interevention, Comparator, and Outcome questions. Appraisal was conducted by an international panel of experts, working on a strictly nonprofit and voluntary basis, to develop concise evidence statements and action-based recommendations using modified Oxford and GRADE criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The guidelines include algorithms that summarise the suggested pathway for standard, uncomplicated patients with UI and are more useable in daily practice. The full version of the guideline is available at http://uroweb.org/guideline/urinary-incontinence/. CONCLUSIONS: These updated guidelines provide an evidence-based summary of the assessment and nonsurgical management of UI, together with a clear clinical algorithm and action-based recommendations. Although these guidelines are applicable to a standard patient, it must be remembered that therapy should always be tailored to individual patients' needs and circumstances. PATIENT SUMMARY: Urinary incontinence is a very common condition which negatively impacts patient's quality of life. Several types of incontinence exist and since the treatments will vary, it is important that the diagnostic evaluation establishes which type is present. The diagnosis should also identify patients who need rapid referral to an appropriate specialist. These guidelines aim to provide sensible and practical evidence-based guidance on the clinical problem of urinary incontinence.
Assuntos
Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Incontinência Urinária , Algoritmos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Europa (Continente) , Prática Clínica Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Incontinência Urinária/diagnóstico , Incontinência Urinária/terapiaRESUMO
Medical expulsive therapy (MET), in particular α-blockers, have been recommended as supportive medication if observational treatment of a ureteral stone was an option. Over the years, a considerable number of randomized controlled trials (RCT) as well as several meta-analyses have been published on MET, supporting the use of α-blockers. However, several recently published high quality, large, placebo-controlled randomized trials raised serious doubts about the effectiveness of α-blockers. The contradictory results of meta-analyses of small RCTs versus the findings of large, well conducted multicenter trials show the methodological vulnerability of meta-analyses, in particular if small single center, lower quality, papers have been included. Small single center trials, for instance, tend to show larger treatment effects compared to multicenter RCTs. It also shows the responsibility of careful planning when conducting a RCT. Trial registration as a prerequisite for approval by ethics committees could in addition minimize publication bias. Weighting the current evidence on whether to use MET, or not, it seems that in distal ureteral stones larger than 5mm, there may be a potential therapeutic benefit for the use of α-blockers. Patients should be informed about the possible, but as yet unproven benefit of using α-blockers in this situation, as well as their off-label use and potential side effects.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/uso terapêutico , Cálculos Ureterais/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has become the first choice for detection of ureteral calculi. Conservative observational management of renal stones is possible, although the availability of minimally invasive treatment often leads to active treatment. Acute renal colic due to ureteral stone obstruction is an emergency that requires immediate pain management. Medical expulsive therapy (MET) for ureteral stones can support spontaneous passage in the absence of complicating factors. These guidelines summarise current recommendations for imaging, pain management, conservative treatment, and MET for renal and ureteral stones. Oral chemolysis is an option for uric acid stones. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the optimal measures for diagnosis and conservative and medical treatment of urolithiasis. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Several databases were searched for studies on imaging, pain management, observation, and MET for urolithiasis, with particular attention to the level of evidence. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Most patients with urolithiasis present with typical colic symptoms, but stones in the renal calices remain asymptomatic. Routine evaluation includes ultrasound imaging as the first-line modality. In acute disease, low-dose CT is the method of choice. Ureteral stones <6mm can pass spontaneously in well-controlled patients. Sufficient pain management is mandatory in acute renal colic. MET, usually with α-receptor antagonists, facilitates stone passage and reduces the need for analgesia. Contrast imaging is advised for accurate determination of the renal anatomy. Asymptomatic calyceal stones may be observed via active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis, observational management, and medical treatment of urinary calculi are routine measures. Diagnosis is rapid using low-dose CT. However, radiation exposure is a limitation. Active treatment might not be necessary, especially for stones in the lower pole. MET is recommended to support spontaneous stone expulsion. PATIENT SUMMARY: For stones in the lower pole of the kidney, treatment may be postponed if there are no complaints. Pharmacological treatment may promote spontaneous stone passage.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico/normas , Urolitíase/diagnóstico , Urolitíase/terapia , Urologia/normas , Doenças Assintomáticas , Humanos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Resultado do Tratamento , Urolitíase/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The terminology and abbreviations used in urologic imaging have generally been adopted on an ad hoc basis by different speciality groups; however, there is a need for shared nomenclature to facilitate clinical communication and collaborative research. OBJECTIVE: This work reviews the current nomenclature for urologic imaging used in clinical practice and proposes a taxonomy and terminology for urologic imaging studies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A list of terms used in urologic imaging were compiled from guidelines published by the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association and from the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Terms searched were grouped into broad categories based on technology, and imaging terms were further stratified based on the anatomic extent, contrast or phases, technique or modifiers, and combinations or fusions. Terms that had a high degree of utilisation were classified as accepted. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: We propose a new taxonomy to define a more useful and acceptable nomenclature model acceptable to all health professionals involved in urology. The major advantage of a taxonomic approach to the classification of urologic imaging studies is that it provides a flexible framework for classifying the modifications of current imaging modalities and allows the incorporation of new imaging modalities. The adoption of this hierarchical classification model ranging from the most general to the most detailed descriptions should facilitate hierarchical searches of the medical literature using both general and specific terms. This work is limited in its scope, as it is not currently all-inclusive. This will hopefully be addressed by future modification as others embrace the concept and work towards uniformity in nomenclature. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a noncomprehensive list of the most widely used terms across different specialties. This list can be used as the basis for further discussion, development, and enhancement. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this paper we describe a classification system for urologic imaging terms with the aim of aiding health professionals and ensuring that the terms used are more consistent.
Assuntos
Diagnóstico por Imagem/classificação , Diagnóstico por Imagem/normas , Terminologia como Assunto , Urologia/organização & administração , Urologia/normas , HumanosRESUMO
CONTEXT: This is an update of the previous European Association of Urology testis cancer guidelines published in 2011, which included major changes in the diagnosis and treatment of germ cell tumours. OBJECTIVE: To summarise latest developments in the treatment of this rare disease. Recommendations have been agreed within a multidisciplinary working group consisting of urologists, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A semi-structured literature search up to February 2015 was performed to update the recommendations. In addition, this document was subjected to double-blind peer review before publication. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: This publication focuses on the most important changes in treatment recommendations for clinical stage I disease and the updated recommendations for follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Most changes in the recommendations will lead to an overall reduction in treatment burden for patients with germ cell tumours. In advanced stages, treatment intensification is clearly defined to further improve overall survival rates. PATIENT SUMMARY: This is an update of a previously published version of the European Association of Urology guidelines for testis cancer, and includes new recommendations for clinical stage I disease and revision of the follow-up recommendations. Patients should be fully informed of all the treatment options available to them.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/terapia , Árvores de Decisões , Humanos , Masculino , Estadiamento de NeoplasiasRESUMO
CONTEXT: Priapism is defined as a penile erection that persists beyond or is unrelated to sexual interest or stimulation. It can be classified into ischaemic (low flow), arterial (high flow), or stuttering (recurrent or intermittent). OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of priapism. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Systematic literature search on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of priapism. Articles with highest evidence available were selected to form the basis of these recommendations. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Ischaemic priapism is usually idiopathic and the most common form. Arterial priapism usually occurs after blunt perineal trauma. History is the mainstay of diagnosis and helps determine the pathogenesis. Laboratory testing is used to support clinical findings. Ischaemic priapism is an emergency condition. Intervention should start within 4-6h, including decompression of the corpora cavernosa by aspiration and intracavernous injection of sympathomimetic drugs (e.g. phenylephrine). Surgical treatment is recommended for failed conservative management, although the best procedure is unclear. Immediate implantation of a prosthesis should be considered for long-lasting priapism. Arterial priapism is not an emergency. Selective embolization is the suggested treatment modality and has high success rates. Stuttering priapism is poorly understood and the main therapeutic goal is the prevention of future episodes. This may be achieved pharmacologically, but data on efficacy are limited. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines summarise current information on priapism. The extended version are available on the European Association of Urology Website (www.uroweb.org/guidelines/). PATIENT SUMMARY: Priapism is a persistent, often painful, penile erection lasting more than 4h unrelated to sexual stimulation. It is more common in patients with sickle cell disease. This article represents the shortened EAU priapism guidelines, based on a systematic literature review. Cases of priapism are classified into ischaemic (low flow), arterial (high flow), or stuttering (recurrent). Treatment for ischaemic priapism must be prompt in order to avoid the risk of permanent erectile dysfunction. This is not the case for arterial priapism.