Internal Hemipelvectomy for primary bone sarcomas using intraoperative patient specific instruments- the next step in limb salvage concept.

BACKGROUND: During pelvic Sarcoma resections, Surgeons often struggle to obtain negative margins while minimizing collateral damage and maintaining limb function. These complications are usually due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis. Here we present an accurate 3D surgical approach, including pre-operative printing of models and intraoperative patient-specific instruments (PSIs) for optimizing pelvic sarcoma resections. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study (N = 11) presents surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes of patients (average age 14.6 +/- 7.6 years, 4 males) who underwent pelvic sarcoma resections using a 3D surgical approach between 2016 and 2021. All patients were followed up for at least 24 months (mean = 38.9 +/- 30.1 months). RESULTS: Our results show promising surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes. Using a 3D approach, 90.9% had negative margins, and 63.6% did not require reconstruction surgery. The average estimated blood loss was 895.45 ± 540.12 cc, and the average surgery time was 3:38 ± 0.05 hours. Our results revealed no long-term complications. Three patients suffered from short-term complications of superficial wound infections. At 24 month follow up 72.7% of patients displayed no evidence of disease. The average Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at 12 months was 22.81. CONCLUSION: 3D technology enables improved accuracy in tumor resections, allowing for less invasive procedures and tailored reconstruction surgeries, potentially leading to better outcomes in function and morbidity. We believe that this approach will enhance treatments and ease prognosis for patients diagnosed with pelvic sarcoma and will become the standard of care in the future.

Navigation and robotics improved alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument, while clinical outcomes were similar in TKA: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To achieve the desired alignment more accurately and improve postoperative outcomes, new techniques such as computer navigation (Navigation), patient-specific instruments (PSI) and surgical robots (Robot) are applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). This network meta-analysis aims to compare the radiological and clinical outcomes among the above-mentioned techniques and conventional instruments (CON). METHODS: A PRISMA network meta-analysis was conducted and study protocol was published online at INPLASY (INPLASY202060018). Three databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane) were searched up to June 1, 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two of the four techniques were included. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed focusing on radiological and clinical outcomes. The odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) in various outcomes were calculated, and the interventions were ranked by the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) value. RESULTS: Seventy-three RCTs were included, with a total of 4209 TKAs. Navigation and Robot could significantly reduce the occurrence of malalignment and malposition compared with PSI and CON, and Navigation could obtain higher medium-and-long-term KSS knee scores than CON. Robot had the greatest advantage in achieving the desired alignment accurately, followed by Navigation; Navigation had the greatest advantage in the KSS score. CONCLUSION: Navigation and Robot did improve the accuracy of alignment compared with PSI and conventional instrument in TKA, but the above four techniques showed no clinical significance in postoperative outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

CT-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in over 700 cases: single-use instruments are as accurate as standard instruments.

PURPOSE: Efforts in total knee arthroplasty are made to improve accuracy for a correct leg axis and reduce component malpositioning using patient-specific instruments. It was hypothesized that use of patient-specific instruments (vs. computer-navigated and conventional techniques) will reduce the number of outliers. Our second hypothesis was that single-use instrumentation will lead to the same accuracy compared to patient-specific instruments made of metal. METHODS: 708 primary total knee arthroplasties between 2014 and 2018 using computer tomography (CT)-based patient-specific cutting block technique and a preoperative planning protocol were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative data [hip-knee-angle (HKA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), tibial slope, femoral component flexion] was compared to postoperative performed standard radiological follow-up X-rays. Differences of > 3° between measurements were defined as outliers. RESULTS: Overall 500 prostheses using standard instrumentation and 208 prostheses using single-use instruments were implanted. Preoperative HKA axes (- 1.2°; p < 0.001), femoral component flexion (Δ 0.8°, p < 0.001), LDFA (Δ - 1.5°, p < 0.001), MPTA (Δ - 0.5°, p < 0.001) and tibial posterior slopes (Δ 0.5°, p < 0.001), respectively, were different from postoperative axes. More outliers occurred using standard (vs. single-use) instruments (p < 0.001) regarding postoperative HKA (ranges of standard- vs. single-use: instruments: HKA 178.0°-180.5° vs. 178.0°-180.5°, femoral component flexion 0.0°-6.0° vs. 0.0°-4.5°, LDFA 90.0°-91.0° vs. 90.0°-90.0°, MPTA 90.0°-90.0° vs. 90.0°-90.0°, tibial posterior slope - 10° to 10° vs. - 1° to 10°). No differences were seen for other angles measured. Comparing both systems, total number of outliers was higher using standard (8%) vs. single-use instruments (4.3%). CONCLUSION: This study shows a high accuracy of CT-based patient-specific instrumentation concerning postoperative achieved knee angles and mechanical leg axes. Single-use instruments showed a similar accuracy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Intermediate-Term Outcome of 3-Dimensional Corrective Osteotomy for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures With a Mean Follow-Up of 6 Years.

PURPOSE: Our study aimed to analyze the functional and radiological intermediate-term outcome of 3-dimensional-guided corrective osteotomies for malunited distal radius fractures and to evaluate the progression of osteoarthritis after this intervention. METHODS: All patients with malunited distal radius fractures who underwent 3-dimensional-guided corrective osteotomies from October 2008 to January 2015 were included. Pre- and postoperative range of motion, grip strength, and postoperative patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Pre- and postoperative osteoarthritis grading was performed using conventional radiographs and the osteoarthritis grading system described by Knirk and Jupiter. Additionally, the evaluation of articular stepoff was performed using pre- and postoperative computed tomography. RESULTS: Fifteen patients, with a mean follow-up of 6 years (range, 4.1-10.4 years), were included. According to rater 1, 8 cases had no postoperative osteoarthritis progression, 6 cases had progression of 1 grade, and 1 case had progression of 2 grades. According to rater 2, there was no progression in 11 cases, and there was progression of 1 grade in 2 cases and progression of 2 grades in 2 cases. Compared with before the surgery, the patients demonstrated a mean improvement of 14.8 kg (±12.6 kg) in grip strength after the surgery. At the last follow-up, the mean Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score was 11.8 (±12.0), the mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 11.1 (±11.4), and the mean residual pain score on the visual analog scale was 0.8 (±1.0). CONCLUSIONS: The intermediate-term outcome of 3-dimensional-guided corrective osteotomies for distal radius intra-articular malunions showed excellent patient-reported outcomes and no clinically relevant progression of osteoarthritis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

[3D printing in fracture treatment : Current practice and best practice consensus]. / 3D-Druck in der Frakturversorgung : Aktuelle Praxis und "Best-practice"-Konsens.

The use of 3D printing in orthopedic trauma is supported by clinical evidence. Existing computed tomography (CT) data are exploited for better stereotactic identification of morphological features of the fracture and enhanced surgical planning. Due to complex logistic, technical and resource constraints, deployment of 3D printing is not straightforward from the hospital management perspective. As a result not all trauma surgeons are able to confidently integrate 3D printing into the daily practice. We carried out an expert panel survey on six trauma units which utilized 3D printing routinely. The most frequent indications are acetabular and articular fractures and malalignments. Infrastructure and manpower structure varied between units. The installation of industrial grade machines and dedicated software as well as the use of trained personnel can enhance the capacity and reliability of fracture treatment. Setting up interdisciplinary jointly used 3d printing departments with sound financial and management structures may improve sustainability. The sometimes substantial logistic and technical barriers which impede the rapid delivery of 3D printed models are discussed.

[Conversion osteotomy for arthrosis of the ankle joint (supramalleolar and inframalleolar)-What can be expected? : Critical review of the literature]. / Umstellungsosteotomien bei Arthrose am Sprunggelenk (supra- und inframalleolar) ­ Was kann man erwarten? : Kritische Übersicht der Literatur.

The aim of supramalleolar conversion osteotomy is to reduce the pain of the patient and stop or at least slow down joint degeneration. The indication for supramalleolar osteotomy is asymmetric osteoarthritis of the ankle joint with varus or valgus deformity. Good clinical results for arthritis can be achieved in the early or middle stages. Besides closing and opening wedge osteotomies dome osteotomy is sometimes indicated, especially for larger deformities. The preoperative preparation of individual patient-specific section blocks facilitates the intraoperative implementation and seems to increase the precision. Further studies are necessary to support this. The indications for additional procedures, such as fibular osteotomy are still being discussed. Inframalleolar osteotomy and soft tissue interventions are frequently necessary for balancing the foot.

Augmented Reality as a Tool to Guide PSI Placement in Pelvic Tumor Resections.

Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) have become a valuable tool for osteotomy guidance in complex surgical scenarios such as pelvic tumor resection. They provide similar accuracy to surgical navigation systems but are generally more convenient and faster. However, their correct placement can become challenging in some anatomical regions, and it cannot be verified objectively during the intervention. Incorrect installations can result in high deviations from the planned osteotomy, increasing the risk of positive resection margins. In this work, we propose to use augmented reality (AR) to guide and verify PSIs placement. We designed an experiment to assess the accuracy provided by the system using a smartphone and the HoloLens 2 and compared the results with the conventional freehand method. The results showed significant differences, where AR guidance prevented high osteotomy deviations, reducing maximal deviation of 54.03 mm for freehand placements to less than 5 mm with AR guidance. The experiment was performed in two versions of a plastic three-dimensional (3D) printed phantom, one including a silicone layer to simulate tissue, providing more realism. We also studied how differences in shape and location of PSIs affect their accuracy, concluding that those with smaller sizes and a homogeneous target surface are more prone to errors. Our study presents promising results that prove AR's potential to overcome the present limitations of PSIs conveniently and effectively.

Early experience using patient-specific instrumentation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instruments (PSI) have been designed to improve the accuracy of performing opening-wedge high-tibial osteotomies (OW-HTO). This study aims to evaluate the lower limb alignment, by comparing pre-operative desired correction to post-operative achieved correction, the difference in surgical time and number of radiological exposures in OW-HTO using patient-specific instruments (PSI) versus conventional osteotomies and the specific and non-specific complications that occurred. METHODS: We performed a single-centre, retrospective, observational study, including 25 consecutive patients undergoing OW-HTO using PSI, from January 2019 to October 2020. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, the mean hip-knee angle (HKA) was 167°, the mean tibial slope was 7.9° and the mean medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) was 82.5°. Post-operatively, the mean HKA was 182.2° (180.1-184.7°), the tibial slope was 6.5° (4.2-12.9°) and the MPTA was 92.8° (90.6-93°). In both coronal and sagittal plane, all knees were within 2° from the planned value. The mean tourniquet time, by which the surgical time was measured, was 40 minutes and the average number of intra-operative fluoroscopic images was 10 (range: 7-14), significantly less than when using conventional techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSI in OW-HTO allows accurate achievement of the desired correction, while shortening the OR time. The number of radiological exposures is also decreased, in comparison with the conventional osteotomies.

Sacroiliac joint cut accuracy: Comparing new technologies in an idealized sawbones model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The anatomical complexity of the pelvis creates challenges for orthopaedic oncologists to accurately and safely resect tumors involving the sacroiliac joint. Current technology may help overcome these obstacles. METHODS: Four fellowship-trained orthopaedic oncologists performed 22 all-posterior sacroiliac cuts using freehand, computerized navigation, and patient-specific cutting guides on a Sawbones male pelvis model. Cut accuracies to preoperative planned margins were analyzed via a high-resolution optical scanner. Soft tissue damage was determined by visually inspecting the Sawbones foam placed on the far side of the cut. RESULTS: Within 5 mm of the margins, the freehand technique resulted in 67.0% cut accuracy, the navigation technique had 71.1%, and the patient-specific cutting guide technique had 85.6% (P = .093). Within 2 mm, the techniques showed an accuracy of 25.8%, 32.5%, and 47.5%, respectively (P = .022). Regarding soft tissue damage, the freehand technique exhibited minimal penetration damage for 16.7% of the cuts, while navigation and patient-specific guide techniques exhibited 25.0% and 75.0%, respectively (P = .046). Years of surgical experience of the operator (1-7) did not influence the cut accuracy for any method. CONCLUSIONS: Under ideal conditions, patient-specific guide technology possesses the same or better accuracy as other cutting techniques as well as the circumvention of soft tissue damage.

Computer-assisted femoral head reduction osteotomies: an approach for anatomic reconstruction of severely deformed Legg-Calvé-Perthes hips. A pilot study of six patients.

BACKGROUND: Legg-Calvé-Perthes (LCP) is a common orthopedic childhood disease that causes a deformity of the femoral head and to an adaptive deformity of the acetabulum. The altered joint biomechanics can result in early joint degeneration that requires total hip arthroplasty. In 2002, Ganz et al. introduced the femoral head reduction osteotomy (FHRO) as a direct joint-preserving treatment. The procedure remains one of the most challenging in hip surgery. Computer-based 3D preoperative planning and patient-specific navigation instruments have been successfully used to reduce technical complexity in other anatomies. The purpose of this study was to report the first results in the treatment of 6 patients to investigate whether our approach is feasible and safe. METHODS: In this retrospective pilot study, 6 LCP patients were treated with FHRO in multiple centers between May 2017 and June 2019. Based on patient-specific 3D-models of the hips, the surgeries were simulated in a step-wise fashion. Patient-specific instruments tailored for FHRO were designed, 3D-printed and used in the surgeries for navigating the osteotomies. The results were assessed radiographically [diameter index, sphericity index, Stulberg classification, extrusion index, LCE-, Tönnis-, CCD-angle and Shenton line] and the time and costs were recorded. Radiologic values were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test and for significance using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS: The sphericity index improved postoperatively by 20% (p = 0.028). The postoperative diameter of the femoral head differed by only 1.8% (p = 0.043) from the contralateral side and Stulberg grading improved from poor coxarthrosis outcome to good outcome (p = 0.026). All patients underwent acetabular reorientation by periacetabular osteotomy. The average time (in minutes) for preliminary analysis, computer simulation and patient-specific instrument design was 63 (±48), 156 (±64) and 105 (±68.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The clinical feasibility of our approach to FHRO has been demonstrated. The results showed significant improvement compared to the preoperative situation. All operations were performed by experienced surgeons; nevertheless, three complications occurred, showing that FHRO remains one of the most complex hip surgeries even with computer assistance. However, none of the complications were directly related to the simulation or the navigation technique.

Patient-specific high-tibial osteotomy's 'cutting-guides' decrease operating time and the number of fluoroscopic images taken after a Brief Learning Curve.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) have been advocated to improve the accuracy of deformity correction in opening-wedge high-tibial osteotomies (HTO). It was hypothesized that PSCGs for HTO would have a short learning curve. Therefore, the goals of this study were to determine the surgeons learning curve for PSCGs used for opening-wedge HTO assessing: the operating time, surgeons comfort levels, number of fluoroscopic images, accuracy of post-operative limb alignment and functional outcomes. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 71 consecutive opening-wedge HTO with PSCGs performed by three different surgeons with different experiences. The operating time, the surgeon's anxiety levels evaluated using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), the number of fluoroscopic images was systematically and prospectively collected. The accuracy of the postoperative alignment was defined by the difference between the preoperative targeted correction and the final post-operative correction both measured on standardized CT-scans using the same protocol (ΔHKA, ΔMPTA, ΔPPTA). Functional outcomes were evaluated at 1 year using the different sub-scores of the KOOS. Cumulative summation (CUSUM) analyses were used to assess learning curves. RESULTS: The use of PSCGs in HTO surgery was associated with a learning curve of 10 cases to optimize operative time (mean operative time 26.3 min ± 8.8), 8 cases to lessen surgeon anxiety levels, and 9 cases to decrease the number of fluoroscopic images to an average of 4.3 ± 1.2. Cumulative PSCGs experience did not affect accuracy of post-operative limb alignment with a mean: ΔHKA = 1.0° ± 1.0°, ΔMPTA = 0.5° ± 0.6° and ΔPPTA = 0.4° ± 0.8°. No significant difference was observed between the three surgeons for these three parameters. There was no statistical correlation between the number of procedures performed and the patient's functional outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of PSCGs requires a short learning curve to optimize operating time, reduce the use of fluoroscopy and lessen surgeon's anxiety levels. Additionally, this learning phase does not affect the accuracy of the postoperative correction and the functional results at 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II: prospective observational study.

Malpositioning of patient-specific instruments within the possible degrees of freedom in high-tibial osteotomy has no considerable influence on mechanical leg axis correction.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are helpful tools in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with symptomatic varus malalignment of the mechanical leg axis. However, the precision of HTO can decrease with malpositioned PSI. This study investigates the influence of malpositioned PSI on axis correction, osteotomy, and implant placement. METHODS: With a mean three-dimensional (3D) model (0.8° varus), PSI-navigated HTOs were computer simulated. Two different guide designs, one with stabilising hooks and one without, were used. By adding rotational and translational offsets of different degrees, wrong placements of PSI were simulated. After 5° valgisation of the postoperative mechanical axis, the distance between joint-plane and osteotomy screws, respectively, were measured. The same simulations were performed in a patient with varus deformity (7.4° varus). RESULTS: In the mean 3D model, the postoperative mechanical axis was within 3.9°-4.5° valgus with mean value of 4.1° ± 0.1° (correct axis 4.2° valgus). Surgical failure concerning osteotomy occurred in 17 of 76 HTOs. Significantly safer screw placement was observed using PSI with stabilising hooks (p = 0.012). In the case of the 3D model with 7.4° varus deformity, the postoperative mechanical axis was within 3.2°-3.9° valgus with mean value of 3.8° ± 0.2° (correct axis 3.9° valgus). Surgical failure concerning osteotomy occurred in 3 of 38 HTOs. Screws were always within the safety distance. CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of the presented study is that malpositioning of a PSI within the possible degrees of freedom does not have a relevant influence on the axis correction. The most vulnerable plane for surgical failure is the sagittal plane, wherefore the treating surgeon should verify correct guide placement to prevent surgical failure, particularly in this plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Accuracy and Early Clinical Outcome After 3-Dimensional Correction of Distal Radius Intra-Articular Malunions Using Patient-Specific Instruments.

PURPOSE: To investigate the residual articular incongruity on computed tomography image data and the early clinical outcome of 3-dimensional planned and navigated intra-articular osteotomies of the distal radius. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of intra-articular osteotomies executed between 2008 and 2016. We identified 37 patients (aged 26-73 years) and performed a combined intra-articular and extra-articular osteotomy on 20 patients. A preoperative 3-dimensional plan with the superimposed bone of the contralateral healthy side was performed in each case to analyze and execute the osteotomy by intraoperative navigation. The residual articular incongruity was assessed by quantification of the maximal stepoff in the coronal or sagittal computed tomography scans. Clinical outcome, including range of motion, grip strength, and return to work, was assessed after a minimum follow-up of 12 months and compared with preoperative measurements. RESULTS: On average, the preoperative intra-articular stepoff was 2.5 mm (±0.6 mm; range, 1.4-4.2 mm) and was significantly reduced to 0.8 mm (±0.2 mm) after surgery. After surgery, 30 patients had a stepoff less than 1 mm; in 7, a stepoff of 1.1 to 1.4 mm was measured. After 1 year, 22 had no pain, 9 had slight pain during heavy work, and 5 had moderate pain with no improvement compared with their preoperative status, although wrist strength and range of motion improved in all 37 patients. One patient underwent a secondary radioscapholunate arthrodeses owing to persistent pain despite a congruent joint with a small residual intra-articular stepoff (0.6 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular osteotomies of the distal radius treated by 3-dimensional preoperative planning and patient-specific guides are an accurate technique to reduce articular incongruity to an average stepoff of 0.8 mm (range, 0.3-1.4 mm). The early clinical outcomes demonstrated overall reduction in pain and improvement of range of motion and grip strength in 36 of 37 patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Similar Risk of Revision After Kinematically Aligned, Patient-Specific Instrumented Total Knee Arthroplasty, and All Other Total Knee Arthroplasty: Combined Results From the Australian and New Zealand Joint Replacement Registries.

BACKGROUND: Kinematic alignment (KA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) replicates individual knee joint line orientation and physiological soft tissue balance. There are limited data on the effect of KA on survivorship compared with other methods of implanting a TKA. The aim of this study was to compare the survivorship of the same design of TKA implanted with either patient-specific instrument (PSI) KA or with computer-assisted surgery and conventionally instrumented. METHODS: We performed an observational study of data from 2 national joint registries on all patients who underwent a TKA with a Triathlon cruciate-retaining TKA (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) from January 2011 to December 31, 2013. The outcomes of knees performed with unrestricted KA using patient-specific instrument were compared with computer-assisted surgery and conventionally instrumented Triathlon cruciate-retaining TKA. The principal outcome measure was time to first revision using Kaplan-Meier estimates of survivorship. Cox proportional hazard ratios, adjusted for age and gender, were used to compare the 2 groups. RESULTS: There were 20,512 TKA procedures recorded, of which 416 were performed using KA-PSI. The KA-PSI group was younger (66.8 ± 8.2 vs 68.3 ± 9.2, P = .001), with an identical gender distribution. The cumulative revision rate at 7 years was 3.1% for the KA-PSI Triathlon cohort and 3.0% for the other Triathlon TKA cohort (P = .89). The most common reasons for revision in the KA-PSI group were maltracking, patella erosion, and arthrofibrosis. CONCLUSION: Kinematically aligned Triathlon TKA using PSI has similar revision rate as all other Triathlon TKA.

No difference in mid-term survival and clinical outcome between patient-specific and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial was to compare the survival rate and clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after MRI-based patient-specific instruments (PSI) and conventional instruments 5 years after initial surgery. METHODS: At a mean follow-up of 5.1 years (0.4), 163 patients (90.6%) with a mean age of 71.8 years (8.7) were analysed. A survival analysis with revision of the TKA as endpoint was performed. The Knee Society Score (KSS), evaluations on plain radiographs and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were obtained preoperatively and at each FU. RESULTS: At final follow-up, one TKA in the PSI- (1.2%) and 3 TKAs in the conventional group (3.8%) had undergone revision surgery (n.s.). No radiological abnormalities were noted at any time point. Postoperatively, the KSS and PROMs significantly improved within each group compared with the preoperative values. There were no clinically relevant differences for the KSS [PSI: 77.4, 9.8 (95% CI 75.0-79.7) vs. conventional: 77.3 10.5 (95% CI 74.9-79.8)] and the PROMs between both groups (n.s.) at 5 years follow-up. CONCLUSION: There is still a lack of reliable data on the survival of TKA and clinical evidence, when using PSI for TKA. Longer follow-up studies are, therefore, needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Improving accuracy of opening-wedge osteotomies of distal radius using a patient-specific ramp-guide technique.

BACKGROUND: Opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal radius, performed with three-dimensional printed patient-specific instruments, are a promising technique for accurate correction of malunions. Nevertheless, reports of residual malalignments and discrepancies in the plate and screw position from the planned fixation exist. Consequently, we developed a patient-specific ramp-guide technique, combining navigation of plate positioning, osteotomy cutting, and reduction. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of navigation of three-dimensional planned opening-wedge osteotomies, using a ramp-guide, over state-of-the-art guide techniques relying solely on pre-drilled holes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on opening-wedge osteotomies of the distal radius, performed between May 2016 and April 2017, with patient-specific instruments. Eight patients were identified in which a ramp-guide for the distal plate fixation was used. We compared the reduction accuracy with a control group of seven patients, where the reduction was performed with pre-drilled screw holes placed with the patient-specific instruments. The navigation accuracy was assessed by comparing the preoperative plans with the postoperative segmented, computed tomography scans. The accuracy was expressed using a 3D angle and in measurements of all six degrees of freedom (3 translations, 3 rotations), with respect to an anatomical coordinate system. RESULTS: The duration of the surgery of the ramp-guide group was significantly shorter compared to the control group. Significantly less rotational and translational residual malalignment error was observed in the open-wedged osteotomies, where patient-specific instruments with ramp-guides were used. On average, a residual rotational malalignment error of 2.0° (± 2.2°) and a translational malalignment error of 0.6 mm (± 0.2 mm) was observed in the ramp-guide group, as compared to the 4.2° (± 15.0°) and 1.0 mm (± 0.4 mm) error in the control group. The used plate was not significantly positioned more accurately, but significantly fewer screws (15.6%) were misaligned in the distal fragment compared to the control group (51.9%). CONCLUSION: The use of the presented ramp-guide technique in opening-wedge osteotomies is improving reduction accuracy, screw position, and surgical duration, compared to the existing patient-specific instrument based navigation methods.

Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient-specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instruments (PSI) were initially developed for the alignment of both total knee- (TKA) and partial knee arthroplasty (PKA). We hypothesize that CT-based PSI for PKA-to-TKA revision surgery can restore biomechanical limb alignment and prosthetic component positioning in vivo as calculated pre-operatively, resulting in a limited percentages of outliers. METHODS: An imaging analysis was performed using CT-based 3D measurement methods based on a pre- and post-revision CT scan. Imaging data were gathered on 10 patients who were operated for PKA-to-TKA revision with the use of PSI based on CT imaging. The planned femur and tibia component position in vivo were compared with the pre-revision planned component position. Outliers were defined as deviations >3.0° from pre-revision planned position for the individual implant components. Adjustments (e.g. resection level and implant size) during surgery were recorded. RESULTS: The HKA axis was restored accurately in all patients with a mean post-operative HKA axis of 178.1° (1.4°). Five femoral (2 varus, 2 internal rotation and 1 extension) and 14 tibial guides (2 varus, 6 anterior slope, 3 internal rotation and 3 external rotation) on a total of 60 outcome measures were identified as outliers. During surgery, an intraoperative tibial resection of 2 mm extra was performed in three patients. In 80 and 70% for, respectively, the femur and tibia, the surgeon-planned size was implanted during surgery. All patient-specific guides fitted well in all patients. No intraoperative or post-operative complications related to surgery were registered. CONCLUSIONS: This study introduced a unique new concept regarding PSI, PKA-to-TKA revision surgery. Based on the results, we were unable to fully confirm our hypothesis. PSI as a "new" tool for PKA-to-TKA revision surgery appears to be an accurate tool for the alignment of the TKA femur component. The tibial guide seems more susceptible to errors, resulting in a substantial percentage of outliers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are already in relatively common use, and their post-operative radiographic results are equal to those for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with conventional instrumentation. PSI use requires a preoperative MRI scan, CT scan, or a combination of MRI and a long-leg standing radiograph. However, there is no consensus as to which of these modalities, MRI or CT, is the preferred imaging modality when performing TKA with PSIs. METHODS: This systematic literature review and meta-analysis studied the differences in alignment outliers between CT- and MRI-based PSI for TKA. A search of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE/PubMed and Embase was conducted, without restriction on date of publication. Only level I evidence studies written in English that included TKA with the use of MRI- and CT-based PSI were selected. A meta-analysis was then performed of the rate of outliers in the biomechanical axis and individual femoral and tibial component alignment. Where considerable heterogeneity among studies was present or the data did not provide sufficient information for performing the meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was undertaken. RESULTS: Twelve randomized controlled trials, studying 841 knees, were eligible for data extraction and meta-analysis. MRI-based PSI resulted in a significantly lower proportion of coronal plane outliers with regard to the lateral femoral component (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.89, P = 0.02), without significant heterogeneity (n.s.). There were no significant differences regarding the biomechanical axis or frontal femoral and individual tibial component alignment. CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that alignment with MRI-based PSI is at least as good as, if not better than, that with CT-based PSI. To prevent for malalignment, MRI should be the imaging modality of choice when performing TKA surgery with PSI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty can accurately predict the component size as used peroperative.

PURPOSE: Patients-specific instruments (PSI) for implantation of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be used to predict the implant size for both the femur and the tibia component. This study aims to determine the impact of approval of the PSI planning for TKA on the frequency of, and reason for intraoperative changes of implant sizes. METHODS: The clinical records of 293 patients operated with MRI- (90.4 %) and CT-based (9.6 %) PSI were reviewed for actual used implant size. Preoperative default planning from the technician and approved planning by the operating surgeon were compared with the intraoperative implanted component size for both the femur and tibia. Intraoperative reason for not following the default sizes was outdated. Furthermore, MRI- and CT-based PSI were compared for these outcomes. RESULTS: In 93.9 and 91.1 % for, respectively, the femur and tibia (n.s.), the surgeon planned size was implanted during surgery. The predicted size of the femur (p < 0.00) and the tibia (p < 0.00) component planned by a technician differed from the implanted component sizes in 62 (21.2 %) and 51 (17.4 %) patients, respectively. In 17 cases, the femoral component size was adapted intraoperative based on the expert opinion of the operating surgeon. In 26 cases, the tibia component was changed during the surgery because of a mediolateral overhang, sclerotic bone, medial or lateral release, limited extension and/or fixed varus deformity. The results between the MRI- and CT-based PSI did not differ (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: PSI is a tool to help the surgeon to achieve the best possible results during TKA. The planning made by a technician should always be validated and approved by the operating surgeon who has the ultimate responsibility regarding the operation. With PSI, the operating surgeon is able to minimize intraoperative implant size errors in advance to improve operating room efficiency with possible lowering hospital costs per procedure. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: III.

Patient specific instrumentation versus conventional knee arthroplasty: comparative study.

BACKGROUND: The key to a successful knee replacement is restoring normal kinematics with a neutral alignment, thus a hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of 180° (within 3° limits). Conventional TKR is proven to have excellent results but relies in extensive visual referencing of bony landmarks. Customised cutting blocks provide accurate bone cuts, also lowering the risk of fat embolism, blood loss and operating time. METHOD: We share our experience comparing two different TKA techniques using patient specific instrumentation (PSI) with the Visionaire knee and conventional instrumentation (CVI) from the same system (Genesis II Smith&Nephew). A total number of 80 knees were divided into two equal groups, 40 PSI and 40 CVI respectively, operated between April 2013 and August 2014. One female patient had bilateral TKR during this period, at six months interval, both with the PSI. RESULTS: All operated knees had varus deformity, with a mean HKA of 168° (PSI) vs 163° (CVI). We used tranexamic acid (double-dose scheme) and suction drains for 48 hours, with a mean blood drainage in the PSI group of 185 ml and Hb levels of 11.2 g/dl at three days post, compared to 260 ml and 10.7 g/dl in the CVI. Mean blood loss was 3.5 g/dl in PSI, and 4.2 g/dl in the CVI. On the long leg standing radiograph at six weeks, all knees were aligned in frontal plane, with simillar HKA values (178.9° PSI vs 178.6° CVI). Bone cuts measured intraoperatively proved to be accurate within a 1 mm limit. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot recommend PSI-TKR for a better outcome. It is an alternative to conventional and computer-assisted TKR, but further studies are needed to evaluate weather surgical or economic benefits may be achieved by choosing customised instruments.