Machine learning analyses constructed a novel model to predict recurrent thrombosis in adults with essential thrombocythemia.

The current study involving 318 essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients with prior thrombosis was designed to identify risk factors that were predictive of recurrent thrombosis. The whole cohort was randomly split into derivation and validation cohorts. The random forest method, support vector machine with built-in recursive feature elimination model, and logistic multivariable analysis were performed in the derivation cohort, and cardiovascular risk factor (CVF) and RBC distribution width with standard deviation (RDW-SD) were finally selected as independent predictors. Subsequently we devise a 3-tiered model (low risk: 0 points; intermediate risk: 1-1.5 points; and high risk: 2.5 points) and it showed good discrimination in all cohorts. Moreover, the model was significantly correlated with rethrombosis-free survival (rTFS) (p = 0.0007 in the derivation cohort; p = 0.0019 in the validation cohort). In the whole cohort, cytoreductive therapy was more effective than antiplatelet agents alone for 10-year rTFS (p = 0.0336). No significant difference in 10-year rTFS was observed among interferon (IFN), hydroxyurea (HU), and IFN + HU therapy (p = 0.444). The present study helps identify individuals who need close monitoring and provides valuable risk signals for recurrence in ET patients with prior thrombosis.

The use of fondaparinux and rituximab for recurrent thrombotic events in antiphospholipid syndrome.

Limited evidence exists to guide the management of recurrent thrombosis occurring despite therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). In this case series, fondaparinux, with or without an antiplatelet agent, provided an effective and safe option in three patients with thrombotic APS, all two triple and one single positive for antiphospholipid antibodies, who had recurrent venous and/or arterial thromboembolism. Rituximab was also used in all patients. Recurrent events occurred despite therapeutic anticoagulation, including at high-intensity, with warfarin and subsequent low-molecular-weight heparin. There were no major bleeding events. Adjunctive therapies used for thrombosis included catheter-directed thrombolysis and rituximab.

Early Postoperative Immunothrombosis of Bioprosthetic Mitral Valve and Left Atrium: A Case Report.

A 72-year-old female patient with mixed rheumatic mitral valve disease and persistent atrial fibrillation underwent mitral valve replacement and suffered from a combined thrombosis of the bioprosthetic valve and the left atrium as soon as 2 days post operation. The patient immediately underwent repeated valve replacement and left atrial thrombectomy. Yet, four days later the patient died due to the recurrent prosthetic valve and left atrial thrombosis which both resulted in an extremely low cardiac output. In this patient's case, the thrombosis was notable for the resistance to anticoagulant therapy as well as for aggressive neutrophil infiltration and release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) within the clot, as demonstrated by immunostaining. The reasons behind these phenomena remained unclear, as no signs of sepsis or contamination of the BHV were documented, although the patient was diagnosed with inherited thrombophilia that could impede the fibrinolysis. The described case highlights the hazard of immunothrombosis upon valve replacement and elucidates its mechanisms in this surgical setting.

Diabetes decreases patency of tunneled catheters in hemodialysis patients after first effective thrombolysis with urokinase.

INTRODUCTION: Fibrinolysis is one of the methods extending the use of vascular access in patients with tunneled venous catheters thrombosis. The aim of this study was to assess one-year maintenance of tunneled catheters patency after first effective thrombolysis with urokinase and identify its predictors. METHODS: Retrospective analysis included 85 patients (age 69 ± 13 years) with permanent venous catheter thrombosis treated with urokinase at one center in the period 2010-2016. Urokinase was used (depending on weight) at a dose of 10,000 or 20,000 IU in an 8 h infusion to each catheter line. Assessment of one-year efficacy of fibrinolysis included the time between fibrinolysis and following thrombosis of the same catheter in patients that have previously obtained at least partial blood flow. The analysis included medication, comorbidities, catheter patency time and INR value during first thrombosis episode. RESULTS: There were 62.4% patients with type-2 diabetes and 11.8% with neoplasm. The thrombolysis procedure was effective in 73 patients (85.9%). An analysis of the one-year efficacy of thrombolysis procedure included 73 patients. Among them, 23 experienced next episode of catheter-related thrombosis within a year postprocedure. Diabetes increased the risk for recurrent thrombosis [HR =3.19 (1.09-9.41); p = .03]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes are at higher risk of recurrent catheter-related thrombosis and therefore may require more aggressive anticoagulation therapy for its prevention.

Exhausting multiple hemodialysis access failures.

INTRODUCTION: Vascular access is often considered the Achilles heel the of hemodialysis because of its impact on morbidity, all cause mortality and finally costs of these patients. The most common complication of permanent hemodialysis (HD) vascular access is thrombosis, with some cases being related to hypercoagulability states. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) is a cause of increased thrombotic tendency, and this may complicate the management of such patients on HD. CASE REPORT: We describe a 41-year-old woman with end stage renal disease (ESRD) from Adult Polycystic Kidney Disease who was referred to our tertiary care center for treatment and selection of renal replacement therapy form. It was thought to initiate with peritoneal dialysis considering her actual conditions. She was putted on hemodialysis for several sessions, and a subclavian cathether was her first vascular access. The surgeon created an arterio-venous fistula which did not mature. After the implantation of the peritoneal cathether she started peritoneal dialysis and continued living with that for 2 years. She felt exhausted and because of a grave peritonitis episode accompanied with procedure failure and a long hospitalization she was transferred to hemodialysis. Renal transplantation was not possible because she didn't have a kidney donation. She was maintained on regular HD, but her dialysis care was complicated by recurrent vascular access failures. She had multiple interventions for arterio-venous fistulas and grafts but almost all of them failed due to thrombosis to the extent that only one access site was available for her routine renal replacement treatment. A thorough thrombophilia screen confirmed the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies. A diagnosis of APAS was made and she was anticoagulated with warfarin. The AVG made in this last available site is still working from 18 months. If it fails we have no answers and solutions for her. CONCLUSION: The presence of APAS can complicate HD management by causing recurrent vascular access thrombosis and failure, and nephrologist must remain alert to this possibility. Checking and treating as soon as possible it's our future challenge.

Direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Optimal treatment regimen for patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) remain unclear. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) vs. direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with APS. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing efficacy and safety of VKAs and DOACs inhibitors in patients with APS. Recurrent thrombosis, all-cause mortality, stroke, adverse reactions, and bleeding were among outcomes of interest. Mantel-Haenszel weighted random-effects model was used to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. Results: The analysis included 625 patients from four randomized controlled trials and one post hoc analysis. Meta-analysis showed statistically non-significant difference between DOACs inhibitors and VKAs in the recurrent thrombosis risk (arterial or venous) [RR 2.77 (95%, CI 0.79, 9.65); P=0.11, I2=50%]. Consistent results were revealed among patients with the previous history of arterial thrombosis [RR 2.76 (95% CI 0.93, 8.16); P=0.75, I2=0%], venous thrombosis [RR 1.71 (95% CI 0.60, 4.84); P=0.31, I2=15%] and patients who were triple antiphospholipid positive [RR 4.12 (95% CI 0.46, 37.10); P=0.21, I2=58%]. DOACs inhibitors were significantly associated with increased risk of stroke [RR 8.51 (95% CI 2.35, 3.82); P=0.47, I2=0%]. Conclusion: DOACs exhibited increased risk of stroke among patients with APS. In addition, although not significant, the higher RRs among patients on DOACs may indicate higher risk of thrombotic events associated with DOACs.

MPL gene mutation is a possible risk factor for thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Since MPL mutation is a rare driver gene mutation found in a small number of essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients, the clinical characteristics of patients with MPL mutations and their association with thrombotic events have not yet been elucidated in Japan. METHODS: We enrolled 579 Japanese ET patients based on the diagnostic criteria of the WHO classification 2017 and compared clinical characteristics of MPL-mutated patients (n = 22; 3.8%) to JAK2V617F-mutated (n = 299; 51.6%), CALR-mutated (n = 144; 24.9%), and triple-negative (TN) (n = 114; 19.7%) patients. RESULTS: Thrombosis during follow up was observed in 4 out of 22 (18.2%) in the MPL-mutated group, which was the highest among all driver gene mutation groups (JAK2V617F-mutated, 8.7%; CALR-mutated, 3.5%; TN,1.8%). The MPL- and JAK2V617F-mutated groups had worse thrombosis-free survival (TFS) than the CALR-mutated (p = 0.043) and TN groups (p = 0.006). Univariable analysis revealed that a history of thrombosis was a possible risk factor for thrombosis among MPL-mutated patients (hazard ratio: 9.572, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: MPL-mutated ET patients should require more intensive management to prevent recurrence of thrombosis.

A significant decrease in D-dimer concentration within one month of anticoagulation therapy as a predictor of both complete recanalization and risk of recurrence after initial pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Abnormal D-dimer concentration measured during anticoagulation therapy (AT) or within one month of discontinuation, is associated with residual pulmonary obstruction (RPO) and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after a first episode of pulmonary embolism (PE). We hypothesized that a significant decrease in D-dimer concentration within the first month of AT in patients with a first episode of PE may predict complete recanalization and a lower risk of recurrent VTE. METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients with PE received anticoagulation therapy for three or six months when control computed tomography angiography (CTA) was performed. D-dimer levels were measured at admission and at 1-, 3- and/or 6-month follow-ups after the initial event. Clinical, echocardiographic, CTA and analytical data were collected. Predictive factors of RPO and predictive ability of D-dimer concentration at 1- and 6-month follow-ups were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 150 eligible patients, 33 (22%) had RPO in control CTA. Idiopathic PE, a delay of >7 days between symptom onset and diagnosis, and clinical PE severity determined by a s-PESI score ≥ 1 were associated with RPO. D-dimer concentration within a month of AT was significantly higher (823 [558-1259] vs 436 [243-934] ng/ml; p = 0.019) in patients with RPO; decrease (445 [35-1899] vs 912 [476-2858] ng/ml; p = 0.047) and decrease percentage (31.4% vs 76.6%; p < 0.005) in D-dimer concentrations were significantly lower. ROC analysis showed that decrease percentage in D-dimer concentration identified patients with complete recanalization (AUC 0.715, [95% CI, 0.611-0.819], p < 0.005). Decreases of >70% in initial D-dimer at 1-month (OR, 0.56, [95% CI, 0.45-0.70] p = 0.037) and 6-month follow-ups (OR, 0.31 [CI 95%, 0.15-0.66], p = 0.03) were associated with a lower risk of recurrent PE. CONCLUSION: A significant decrease in D-dimer concentration within the first month of AT is associated with complete recanalization and could predict a lower risk of recurrent thrombosis after a first episode of PE.

Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review.

Anticoagulation therapy is the first line and drug of choice for both the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism). Anticoagulation drugs, ranging from different preparations of heparin, warfarin, and newer direct oral drugs such as rivaroxaban and dabigatran, work mainly by inhibiting important factors and enzymes in the coagulation cascade by preventing fibrin formation, platelet aggregation, and clot assembly. With recurrent thrombosis and embolisms being a feared complication for many physicians treating such cases, anticoagulation is often extended beyond the initial three- to six-month acute phase after an incident of venous thromboembolism. For some groups of patients, anticoagulation needs to be offered indefinitely to decrease the risk of a recurrent thrombosis. However, this concomitantly increases obvious and dangerous adverse effects such as increased risk of hemorrhage, as the ability to clot is hindered. This tradeoff between recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding is what underscores the controversy of the clinical question: for how long should anticoagulation be administered for venous thromboembolism? This review analyzes the use of anticoagulants in different types of venous thromboembolism and remarks on current consensus and trends on the length of anticoagulation treatment. We are doing so while acknowledging that venous thromboembolism management is an active area of research that is rapidly evolving. A literature search was performed looking at recent studies on anticoagulant administration for the treatment of venous thromboembolism with a focus on varying durations and patient populations. Factors that affect clinical decisions of duration are also elucidated. The most clinically relevant anticoagulants were discussed and their effects on the risk of recurrent thrombosis and embolism, and the risk of bleeding in relation to other drugs were analyzed. Ultimately, this article discussed patterns of anticoagulant treatments duration and which patient groups are likely to benefit the most from certain durations, shedding light on the ambiguity in how physicians should approach administering anticoagulation therapy over time for a broad range of presentations of venous thromboembolism.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: A practical guide to diagnosis and management.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is characterised by venous, arterial and/or small vessel thrombosis in the context of persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The diagnosis and management of thrombotic APS continues to prove challenging for clinicians. We provide a practical guide to the diagnosis of APS including who to test for aPL and which tests to do. We also consider clinical practice points on the management of venous, arterial and small vessel thrombosis, in the context of first and recurrent thrombotic events. Non-criteria manifestations of APS are reviewed. An approach to recurrent thrombosis and anticoagulant-refractory APS is discussed, with options including increasing the anticoagulation intensity of vitamin K antagonists, switching to low-molecular-weight-heparin, the use of fondaparinux and/or the addition of antiplatelet treatment. Adjunctive options such as vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine and statins are also addressed.

Deep Venous Thrombosis in a Patient with a Moderate Pretest Probability and a Negative D-Dimer Test: A Review of the Diagnostic Algorithms.

Modern diagnostic strategies of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have been developed. In this review, the diagnostic algorithms for deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and their parameters are discussed individually in the context of reporting a case of DVT in a 43-year-old Caucasian female with a moderate pretest probability stratified by Wells' score and a negative high quality D-dimer test. The patient was on treatment with Xarelto (rivaroxaban), 20 mg PO daily at the time of presentation. The diagnosis was verified through a complete lower limb ultrasound (US). This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and pitfalls of the current algorithms, especially those seen in a subgroup of patients such as patients with cancer, pregnancy, recurrent VTE or are on anticoagulation therapy at the time of presentation. The diagnosis of DVT is less plausible in a patient who is on anticoagulation therapy, but physicians should be aware of such a possibility. Physicians should also know in advance the numerous clinically relevant limitations of D-dimer testing before interpreting the results. Unifying the current diagnostic strategies, modifying the current Wells' score and using the protocol of a whole-leg compression US instead of the limited US protocol are among the several cautious suggestions that have been proposed based on this review to possibly decrease the incidence of missed DVT.

Who Watches the "Watchman" and How Often?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that is encountered during the hospitalization. Sometimes, many patients cannot be anticoagulated to prevent AF-related cardiovascular accidents because of the risk of bleeding. In these cases, we recommend putting left atrial appendage (LAA) to prevent thrombus formation in the left atrium due to AF. There is no clear time frame of how long we need to follow up with echocardiogram to monitor device-related blood clot formation and continue anticoagulation therapy if there is recurrent thrombus formation after LAA placement. We would like to present a case with AF in which the patient had epistaxis, which required to hold anticoagulation and arterial embolization. The patient agreed to the placement of the Watchman device and subsequently it was complicated by device-related thrombosis (DRT). The patient required prolonged anticoagulation treatment and follow-up echocardiogram to prevent DRT in the future.

Recurrent arterial thrombosis of the lower extremity with secondary thrombocythemia due to reperfusion injury: a case report.

Thrombocythemia is an important cause for thrombogenesis and can be classified as essential or secondary according to the etiology. Secondary thrombocythemia (ST), also called reactive thrombocytosis, is caused by a disorder that triggers increased production by normal platelet-forming cells and is characterized in terms of abnormal increased number of platelet in blood and megakaryocytes in bone marrow. Previous reports have found that complications from malignant tumors, chronic inflammation, acute inflammation, acute hemorrhage, spleen resection etc. to be the common causes of ST. A 53-year-old Chinese male with right lower limb arterial ischemic embolism developed recurring arterial thrombosis at the previous site after operation. During his hospitalization, the patient had a platelet count that was positively correlated with alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), α-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (α-HBDH), creatine kinase (CK), and creatine kinase isoenzyme MB (CK-MB) while his thromboelastogram (TEG) and platelet aggregation test obtained by sequential platelet count showed inconsistent platelet function. We describe a case in which ischemia-reperfusion injury caused ST and recurrent thrombosis and analyse the probable cause of contradictory results of different platelet function tests. In thrombolytic therapy, we recommend adding platelet count and two more platelet aggregation tests to the routine laboratory items to aid in the prevention of recurrent thrombosis.

High risk of thrombosis in patients with advanced lung cancer harboring rearrangements in ROS1.

INTRODUCTION: Based on the high incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) observed in lung adenocarcinomas with ALK translocations and taking into account the biological proximity of ROS1 and ALK, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced lung carcinoma carrying rearrangements in ROS1 from 23 centres in Spain and one centre in Portugal. METHODS: The main objective of the study was to analyse the incidence of TE in this population, looking for predictive risk factors, and its impact on overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included. The incidence of TEs throughout the disease was 46.6% (n = 27) with a median follow-up of 19 months (range: 1-78 months) and a median overall survival of 52 months in the total population and 50 months for the patients presenting TEs, with a hazards ratio of 1.12 (95% confidence interval: 0.47-2.65) p = 0.78. The majority of the events were venous (n = 24; 89%) and occurred in the ambulatory setting (n = 18; 67%). Almost half of the patients (n = 13; 48%) presented the TE in the peri-diagnostic period. CONCLUSIONS: The high incidence of thrombosis, especially during the cancer diagnosis process, requires special attention from a clinician. Despite the limitations of such a small descriptive study, its results are in accordance with previously reported data. It would be important to design prospective studies of antithrombotic prophylaxis in this population because of their possible impact in reducing the risk of TEs.

[Risk factors for recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia].

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of recurrent thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) to probe the risk factors for recurrent thrombosis in patients with ET and PV. Methods: The clinical data of 104 ET and PV patients with thrombosis in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from February 2001 to November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Thrombosis reoccurred in 38 patients. Statistical analyses were performed by multivariate logistic regression for risk factors of recurrent thrombosis in ET and PV patients. Results: Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 36.5% of patients with ET/PV, the total incidence rate in ET and PV patients was 9.8% patient-years, 12.3% patient-years and 5.7% patient-years in ET and PV respectively. There were a total of 56 re-thrombotic events, and 42.1% of events occurred within 1 year after the first thrombosis. The arterial re-thrombosis was 97.4% (most of acute coronary syndrome, ACS), and venous events was 2.6%. The most common cases of re-thrombosis were ACS in ET patients (18 cases, 64.3%), and cerebral infarction in PV patients (7 cases, 70.0%). The number of PV patients with 2 times or more re-thrombotic events was significantly higher than that of ET patients (9 cases, 90.0% vs 7 cases, 25.0%). The proportion of the patients with WBC>12.5×10(9)/L or Hct>45%, and thrombosis history or splenomegaly and high risk thrombotic events were higher than those with a single thrombus (52.6% vs 31.8%; 50.0% vs 30.0%; 86.8% vs 13.6%; 84.2% vs 33.3%; 52.6% vs 15.2%; 94.7% vs 53.0%; P values were 0.036,0.046, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Logistic regression analysis showed that thrombosis history (OR=13.697, P=0.025), splenomegaly (OR=13.301, P=0.034) and high risk stratification of thrombotic events (OR=44.618, P=0.025) were independent risk factors for recurrent thrombotic events. Conclusions: ET and PV patients had a higher risk of re-thrombosis. The incidence of re-thrombosis in ET was higher than in PV, ACS was more common cases of re-thrombotic events; but PV patients were more susceptible to multiple re-thromboses than ET ones, also with more cerebral infarction. Previous thrombus history, splenomegaly and high risk stratification of thrombotic events were independent risk predictors for re-thrombosis of ET and PV patients.

Increased risk of thrombosis in antiphospholipid syndrome patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants. Results from an international patient-level data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but their clinical efficacy and safety are not established in Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) patients. There is only one randomized controlled trial published while others are still ongoing. Many non-randomized studies have been published in this field with conflicting opinions. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We conducted a systematic review using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from 2000 until March 2018 regarding APS patients treated with DOACs. We performed a patient-level data meta-analysis to a) estimate the prevalence of recurrent thrombosis in APS patients treated with DOACs in the literature, and b) identify variables associated with recurrent thrombosis. RESULTS: We identified 47 studies corresponding to 447 APS patients treated with DOACs. Three commercially available DOACs were analyzed: rivaroxaban (n = 290), dabigatran etexilate (n = 144) and apixaban (n = 13). A total of 73 out of 447 patients (16%) experienced a recurrent thrombosis while on DOACs with a mean duration until thrombosis of 12.5 months. Rates of recurrent thromboses were 16.9% and 15% in APS patients receiving either anti-Xa inhibitors or dabigatran respectively. Triple positivity (positivity for all three antiphospholipid antibodies) was associated with a four-fold increased risk of recurrent thrombosis (56% vs 23%; OR = 4.3 [95%CI; 2.3-7.7], p < 0.0001) as well as a higher number of clinical criteria for APS classification. In patients treated with anti-Xa inhibitors, history of arterial thrombosis was associated with a higher risk of recurrent thrombosis (32% vs 14%; OR = 2.8 [95%CI; 1.4-5.7], p = 0.006). In conclusion, DOACs are not effective in all APS patients and should not be used routinely in these patients. Randomized controlled trials assessing clinical efficacy and safety as primary endpoints are underway. In the meantime, a registry of APS patients on DOACs could be proposed to establish in which APS subgroups DOACs would be a safe alternative to warfarin.

Risk of cancer after anticoagulation in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: an observational cohort study.

Essentials Data on long-term cancer risk are controversial in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). We assessed long-term rates and risk factors of cancer in patients with VTE. Cancer risk after anticoagulation is not higher in VTE patients than in the general population. VTE recurrence is not predictive of a future cancer diagnosis. SUMMARY: Background Patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of having a subsequent cancer diagnosis. The risk is highest during the first 6 months. Reports on cancer rates thereafter are controversial. We aimed to assess long-term rates and risk factors of cancer in patients with VTE. Methods and Results We followed patients with a first unprovoked VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulation, and excluded those receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy or with major thrombophilia. The study endpoint was the occurrence of cancer. Sixty-two (5.2%) of 1188 patients developed cancer during a median follow-up of 98 months. The cumulative incidence rates of cancer were 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-1.2%), 3.1% (95% CI 2.0-4.1%) and 9% (95% CI 6.5-11.5) after 1, 5 and 15 years; these were not significantly different from those in the matched general population (0.6%, 3.4%, and 12.2%, respectively). The corresponding standardized incidence ratios (ratio of the observed cancer cases and the number of cases based on national cancer incidence rates) of 1.1 (95% CI 0.5-2.5), 1.0 (95% CI 0.6-1.4) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2) did not indicate a difference in cancer incidence between our cohort and the general population. Advancing age (hazard ratio [HR] per decade 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-2.0) and shorter duration of anticoagulation (HR per 1-month decrease 1.3, 95% CI 1.1-1.6) were associated with an increased cancer risk, whereas VTE recurrence was not (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.66-2.07). Conclusions Asymptomatic patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed anticoagulation therapy do not have a higher cancer risk. The inverse association between the duration of anticoagulation and the incidence of cancer warrants further investigation.

Vitamin K Antagonists Compared to Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins for Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: An Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice. An Observational Study in Routine Clinical Practice.

Since several trials have demonstrated that low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) is superior to vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer-associated VTE, guidelines now recommend LMWH monotherapy in this setting. We evaluated whether this shift resulted in improved outcomes in routine clinical practice. We performed a cohort study of consecutive patients with cancer-associated VTE during 2001 and 2010. We compared the risks for recurrent VTE, major bleeding and mortality between patients diagnosed before and after 2008 during a 6-month routine follow-up. A total of 381 patients were included, of which 234 (61.4%) were diagnosed before 2008. Before 2008, 23% of the patients were treated with LMWH; thereafter, this percentage was higher: 67%. The 6-month incidence for recurrent VTE was 8.6% in patients diagnosed before 2008 versus 7.5% for patients diagnosed after 2008 (risk difference [RD]: -1.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -6.3, 5.3). The respective risks for major bleeding were 6.4 versus 4.8% (RD: -1.6%; 95% CI: -3.8 to 5.8), and 39.7 versus 41.5% (RD: 1.8%; 95% CI: -8.8, 12) for overall mortality. The mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) of patients treated with VKA was 61%. Despite a clear shift toward LMWH as agent of choice for cancer-associated VTE, we did not observe a clear improvement in terms of recurrent VTE and bleeding complications.

Intravascular Biphasic Synovial Sarcoma: The Beneficial Role of Adjuvant Treatment Approach in the Pre-metastatic Stage.

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a high-grade, rare variant of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). The biphasic subtype is less common than the monophasic subtype. SS is very common around joint cavities in the extremities, but can be present elsewhere in the body. Tumor staging and therapeutic management are usually clear for a localized disease, but the proper management at the metastatic stage can be unclear. According to the literature, the histologic presence of an SS tumor thrombus affects tumor staging, making it unclear whether the tumor stage corresponds to localized or metastatic disease. An intravascular SS tumor exhibiting high metastatic potential is a rare finding that warrants thorough investigation. A 49-year-old woman presented with a biphasic SS intravascular tumor of the left inguinal area with femoral vessels involvement. Ten cases of intravascular SS have been reported in the literature and contain little information regarding the proper management of a local metastatic disease. Ours is a rare case of SS with an intravascular tumor occupying the femoral-iliac vein (as seen in metastatic disease) that has been treated as a local disease with a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach. As a result, our patient has been disease-free for two years and, during that time, has achieved an acceptable quality of life. We discuss the pertinent clinical findings of this rare tumor and review the literature of tumor thrombus by SS. We also present the multidisciplinary therapeutic approach realized and the history of this disease.