[Surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer: Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]. / Chirurgie des cancers avancés de l'ovaire. Article rédigé sur la base de la recommandation nationale de bonnes pratiques cliniques en cancérologie intitulée « Conduites à tenir initiales devant des patientes atteintes d'un cancer épithélial de l'ovaire ¼ élaborée par FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY sous l'égide du CNGOF et labellisée par l'INCa.

Debulking surgery is the key step of advanced stage ovarian cancer treatment with chemotherapy. The quality of surgical resection is the main prognosis factor, thus a complete resection must be achieved (grade A) in an expert center (grade B). Surgery for stage IV is possible and has a benefit in case of complete peritoneal resection (LoE3). Pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomies are recommended in case of clinical or radiological suspicious lymph nodes (grade B). In absence of clinical or radiological suspicious lymph nodes and in case of complete peritoneal resection during initial debulking surgery, lymphadenectomy can be omitted because it won't change nor medical treatment nor overall survival (grade B). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be proposed in case of: impossibility to perform initial complete surgical resection (grade B) ; alteration of general state or co-morbidities or elderly patient (in order to decrease morbidity and increase quality of life) (grade B); stage IV with multiple intra-hepatic or pulmonary metastasis or important ascites with miliary (grade B). In case of stage III or IV ovarian cancer diagnosed on a biopsy during prior laparotomy, a neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery should be preferred (gradeC). In case of palliative surgery or peroperative impossibility to perform a complete resection, no data regarding the type of surgery to perform influencing survival or quality of life is available. Peritoneal carcinosis description before resection and residual disease at the end of the surgery should be reported (size, location and reason of non-extirpability) (grade B). A score of peritoneal carcinosis such as Peritoneal Carcinosis Index (PCI) should be used in order to objectively evaluate the tumoral burden (gradeC). A standardized operative report is recommended (gradeC).

Post-surgical vestibular schwannoma remnant tumors: What to do?

BACKGROUND: Vestibular schwannomas (VS) are benign tumors of the vestibular nerve's myelin sheath. The current trend in VS surgery is to preserve at the facial function, even if it means leaving a small vestibular schwannoma tumor remnant (VSTR) after the surgery. There is no defined therapeutic management VSTR. The aim of this study was to assess the evolution of the VSTR to define the best therapeutic management and identify predictive factors of VSTR progression. METHODS: Among the 256 patients treated surgically for VS in the Department of Neurosurgery at Angers University Hospital, 33 patients with a post-surgical VSTR were included in this retrospective study. For all surgical patients, the data collected were age at diagnosis, the Koos classification, the surgical access, the existence of a type 2 neurofibromatosis (NF2), the TR location and size on control MRI-scans. Patients had a bi-annual follow-up with clinical status and VSTR size assessment with MRI-scan. Survival analyzes were performed to determine the time and rate of VSTR progression, and identify factors of progression. RESULTS: The mean follow-up of the population was 51 months. All VS remnant progression occurred between 38 and 58 months after surgery. In non-NF2 patients with first follow-up MRI-scan three months after surgery, 43% presented a spontaneous regression, 50% a stability and 7% a progression of the VSTR. In the same population with the 1-year MR-scan after surgery as baseline, 25% presented a spontaneous regression, 62.5% a stability and 12.5% a VSTR progression. These data are consistent with the data reported in the literature. The post-operative facial function impairment and an initial remnant ≥ 1.5cm(3) were found to be significant risk factors of VS remnant progression in non-NF2 population in univariate analysis (P=0.048 and 0.031) but not in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In our experience, the best therapeutic management of the post-surgical VSTP in non-NF2 patients with no risk factor of progression is a simple clinical radiological follow-up otherwise complementary radiosurgery should be considered.