Monotherapy with infusion therapies - useful or not?

Infusion pump-based therapies are an effective treatment option for patients with advanced Parkinson´s disease. Achieving monotherapy with infusion-based therapies could simplify the treatment regimen, provide better medication adherence, reduce adverse events and drug interactions. This review presents the literature data on the efficacy, safety, and achievability of monotherapy with all available infusion-based therapies, including apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa-intestinal gel (LCIG), levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG), and foslevodopa-foscarbidopa (LDp/CDp). In summary, monotherapy is achievable and effective in most patients on intestinal levodopa infusion therapy and in some patients on apomorphine infusion. There is a need for further investigation of monotherapy compared to polytherapy, especially in new pump treatment options (LECIG and LDp/CDp). Future research should reveal which patients on infusion-based therapies could benefit from monotherapy, including identification of potential baseline predictors of achieving monotherapy in patients treated with specific infusion-based therapies.

Comment on "Does the 5-2-1 criteria identify patients with advanced Parkinson's disease? Real-world screening accuracy and burden of 5-2-1-positive patients in 7 countries".

The 5-2-1 criteria are intended to help general neurologists identify patients with advanced Parkinson's disease who may benefit from treatment optimisation, such as with a device-aided therapy. Although the 5-2-1 criteria claim to address an unmet need, we urge readers to cautiously interpret the results of this validation study.

Response to letter to the editor regarding "Does the 5-2-1 criteria identify patients with advanced Parkinson's disease? Real-world screening accuracy and burden of 5-2-1-positive patients in 7 countries".

The 5-2-1 criteria was developed to facilitate the identification and referral of patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD) inadequately controlled by oral medications. The criterion was not developed to screen patients with PD for device-aided therapy eligibility. The robust design and validation of the 5-2-1 criteria minimizes over or inappropriate referrals, and supports physicians in the timely identification of patients with PD who may warrant further evaluation for treatment optimization. This response letter clarifies concerns raised by Moes et al.

An Artificial Neural Network Predicts Gender Differences of Motor and Non-Motor Symptoms of Patients with Advanced Parkinson's Disease under Levodopa-Carbidopa Intestinal Gel.

Background and Objectives: Currently, no tool exists to predict clinical outcomes in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) under levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment. The aim of this study was to develop a novel deep neural network model to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced PD after two years of LCIG therapy. Materials and Methods: This was a longitudinal, 24-month observational study of 59 patients with advanced PD in a multicenter registry under LCIG treatment from September 2019 to September 2021, including 43 movement disorder centers. The data set includes 649 measurements of patients, which make an irregular time series, and they are turned into regular time series during the preprocessing phase. Motor status was assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts III (off) and IV. The NMS was assessed by the NMS Questionnaire (NMSQ) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), the quality of life by PDQ-39, and severity by Hoehn and Yahr (HY). Multivariate linear regression, ARIMA, SARIMA, and Long Short-Term Memory-Recurrent NeuralNetwork (LSTM-RNN) models were used. Results: LCIG significantly improved dyskinesia duration and quality of life, with men experiencing a 19% and women a 10% greater improvement, respectively. Multivariate linear regression models showed that UPDRS-III decreased by 1.5 and 4.39 units per one-unit increase in the PDQ-39 and UPDRS-IV indexes, respectively. Although the ARIMA-(2,0,2) model is the best one with AIC criterion 101.8 and validation criteria MAE = 0.25, RMSE = 0.59, and RS = 0.49, it failed to predict PD patients' features over a long period of time. Among all the time series models, the LSTM-RNN model predicts these clinical characteristics with the highest accuracy (MAE = 0.057, RMSE = 0.079, RS = 0.0053, mean square error = 0.0069). Conclusions: The LSTM-RNN model predicts, with the highest accuracy, gender-dependent clinical outcomes in patients with advanced PD after two years of LCIG therapy.

Should continuous dopaminergic stimulation be a standard of care in advanced Parkinson's disease?

The standard of care is a term that refers to the level of care, skill, and treatment that a healthcare provider should offer to a patient based on the current scientific evidence and the level of medical knowledge available in the field. For Parkinson's disease (PD), the standard care is mostly considered to be oral treatment with dopaminergic drugs, particularly levodopa which remains the 'gold standard'. However, effective management with levodopa during the later stages of the disease becomes increasingly challenging due to the ongoing neurodegenerative process, the consequences of its pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation, and the gastrointestinal barriers to effective drug absorption. As a result, the concept of applying continuous dopaminergic stimulation has emerged with infusion therapies (continuous subcutaneous apomorphine, levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, and levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel infusion). These therapies seek to provide continuous stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors that is efficient not only in alleviating clinical symptoms, but also in delaying, reducing, and possibly preventing the onset of levodopa-related motor (fluctuations, dyskinesia) and non-motor complications; and they are also associated with clinically relevant side effects. Clinical studies and real-life experience support the notion that infusion therapies should be accepted as part of the standard of care for patients with advanced PD who have refractory, severe, and disabling motor complications that affect their quality of life. However, they should be considered based on the needs of individualized patients and the access to these advanced therapies needs to be made more accessible to the general PD population.

Apprends-moi l'art des petits pas: Levodopa, Carbidopa Intestinal Gel plus Entacapone.

We are always looking for the big breakthrough, ideally a cure for our advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD) patients. As long as this does not happen we must optimize the existing therapy, because many small steps may also lead to success. This also applies to the levodopa pump: Certainly, a very good therapy, but with small problems that we have to optimize. This involves, for example, the weight and volume of the previous pump. One possibility is to use the proven triple combination as intestinal gel, thereby increasing the levodopa plasma concentration. Increasing the levodopa plasma concentration enables the reduction of the given levodopa dose and hence the size of the pump. To learn more about the triple combination as intestinal gel the ELEGANCE study was started. This study is a prospective non-interventional study of the long-term effectiveness and safety of levodopa-entacapone-carbidopa intestinal gel (LECIG) in patients with aPD in routine care. This observational study is designed to collect data on the use of the drug Lecigon® in daily clinical practice. The study is intended to supplement the results of previous clinical studies with clinical data in routine medical care, collected from approximately 300 patients.

Are Parkinson's disease patients referred too late for device-aided therapies and how can better informed and earlier referrals be encouraged?

In the advanced Parkinson's disease, motor and non-motor symptoms become more severe and more difficult to treat. Oral therapy may become insufficient in controlling a patient´s motor complications, which results in a substantial deterioration of the patient's quality of life, ability to work and self-reliance. This is when device-aided treatments should be considered and offered, if suitable for a given patient. They include subcutaneous and intestinal infusion therapies, deep brain stimulation and, more recently, MRI-guided focussed ultrasound. Device-aided treatments should be offered in accordance with guidelines and treatment standardization. Also there is a need to ensure availability of treatment and education of patients and physicians.

Continuous Dopaminergic Stimulation Improves Cortical Maladaptive Changes in Advanced Parkinson's Disease.

BACKGROUND: With the progression of Parkinson's disease (PD), pulsatile treatment with oral levodopa causes maladaptive changes within basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits, which are clinically expressed as motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. At the level of the motor cortex, these changes may be detected using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as abnormal corticospinal and intracortical excitability and absent response to plasticity protocols. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of continuous dopaminergic stimulation on cortical maladaptive changes related to oral levodopa treatment. METHODS: Twenty patients with advanced PD were tested using TMS within 1 week before and again 6 months after the introduction of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel. We measured resting and active motor thresholds, input/output curve, short interval intracortical inhibition curve, cortical silent period, and response to intermittent theta burst stimulation. Patients were clinically assessed with Part III and Part IV of the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. RESULTS: Six months after the introduction of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel, motor fluctuations scores (P = 0.001) and dyskinesias scores (P < 0.001) were reduced. Resting and active motor threshold (P = 0.012 and P = 0.015) and x-intercept of input/output curve (P = 0.005) were also decreased, while short-interval intracortical inhibition and response to intermittent theta bust stimulation were improved (P = 0.026 and P = 0.031, respectively). Changes in these parameters correlated with clinical improvement. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced PD, switching from intermittent to continuous levodopa delivery increased corticospinal excitability and improved deficient intracortical inhibition and abnormal motor cortex plasticity, along with amelioration of motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. Continuous dopaminergic stimulation ameliorates maladaptive changes inflicted by chronic pulsatile dopaminergic stimulation. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Criteria for identification of advanced Parkinson's disease: the results of the Italian subgroup of OBSERVE-PD observational study.

BACKGROUND: Frequency of Advanced Parkinson's Disease (APD) and its clinical characteristics are still not well defined. Here, we aimed to assess APD prevalence in the Italian OBSERVE-PD cohort, as well as treatment eligibility to device-aided therapies (DAT), and to compare the APD clinical judgment with the established Delphi criteria. METHODS: This sub-group analysis of the OBSERVE-PD study was performed on patients enrolled by 9 Movement Disorders centers in Italy. Motor and non-motor symptoms, PD characteristics, activities of daily living, and quality of life were assessed. Patient eligibility for DAT, response to current PD treatments, referral process, and the concordance between APD physician's judgment and Delphi criteria were also assessed. RESULTS: According to physician's judgment, 60 out of 140 patients (43%) had APD. The correlation between physician's judgment and the overall APD Delphi criteria was substantial (K = 0.743; 95%CI 0.633-0.853), mainly driven by a discrete concordance found for the presence of ≥ 2 h of daily OFF time, presence of troublesome dyskinesia, ≥ 5 times daily oral levodopa dosing, and activities of daily living limitation. Forty-four (73%) APD patients were considered eligible to DAT but only 18 of them (41%) used these therapies, while most patients, independently from their eligibility, continued to use 3-5 oral daily medications, due to fear of invasive solutions and need to have a longer time to decide. CONCLUSION: APD was frequent in the Italian OBSERVE-PD population. DAT in the eligible APD population proved to be underused, in spite of unsatisfactory symptoms control with oral medications in 67% of patients.

Does the 5-2-1 criteria identify patients with advanced Parkinson's disease? Real-world screening accuracy and burden of 5-2-1-positive patients in 7 countries.

BACKGROUND: The burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) worsens with disease progression. However, the lack of objective and uniform disease classification challenges our understanding of the incremental burden in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) and suboptimal medication control. The 5-2-1 criteria was proposed by clinical consensus to identify patients with advancing PD. Our objective was to evaluate the screening accuracy and incremental clinical burden, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and humanistic burden in PD patients meeting the 5-2-1 screening criteria. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Adelphi Parkinson's Disease Specific Program (DSP™), a multi-country point-in-time survey (2017-2020). People with PD who were naive to device-aided therapy and on oral PD therapy were included. Patients meeting the 5-2-1 screening criteria had one or more of the three clinical indicators of APD: (i) ≥5 doses of oral levodopa/day, OR (ii) "off" symptoms for ≥2 h of waking day, OR (iii) ≥1 h of troublesome dyskinesia. Clinician assessment of PD stage was used as the reference in this study. Clinical screening accuracy of the 5-2-1 criteria was assessed using area under the curve and multivariable logistic regression models. Incremental clinical, HCRU, and humanistic burden were assessed by known-group comparisons between 5 and 2-1-positive and negative patients. RESULTS: From the analytic sample (n = 4714), 33% of patients met the 5-2-1 screening criteria. Among physician-classified APD patients, 78.6% were 5-2-1 positive. Concordance between clinician judgment and 5-2-1 screening criteria was > 75%. 5-2-1-positive patients were nearly 7-times more likely to be classified as APD by physician judgment. Compared with the 5-2-1-negative group, 5-2-1-positive patients had significantly higher clinical, HCRU, and humanistic burden across all measures. In particular, 5-2-1-positive patients had 3.8-times more falls, 3.6-times higher annual hospitalization rate, and 3.4-times greater dissatisfaction with PD treatment. 5-2-1-positive patients also had significantly lower quality of life and worse caregiver burden. CONCLUSIONS: 5-2-1 criteria demonstrated potential as a screening tool for identifying people with APD with considerable clinical, humanistic, and HCRU burden. The 5-2-1 screening criteria is an objective and reliable tool that may aid the timely identification and treatment optimization of patients inadequately controlled on oral PD medications.

Adverse effects of levodopa/carbidopa intrajejunal gel treatment: A single-center long-term follow-up study.

OBJECTIVES: Levodopa/carbidopa intrajejunal gel (LCIG) is an effective therapeutic strategy to overcome levodopa-induced motor complications in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it requires invasive percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J) and may be associated with serious adverse effects (AE). In this study, we aimed to evaluate long-term AEs related to LCIG treatment in a large homogenous cohort of advanced PD patients. METHODS: One hundred three consecutive PD patients were regularly monitored for LCIG-related, PEG-J-related, and device-related AEs up to 14 years. Incidence of AEs was studied in time applying a time-to-event analysis and Cox proportional hazard model with age, disease duration, gender, and recurrent AE as covariates. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was estimated at each visit and compared to HRQoL before the LCIG treatment. RESULTS: Among 296 AEs noted, 48.8% were LCIG-related, 32.4% PEG-J-related, and 19.6% device-related. While most of the studied AEs steadily accumulated throughout the follow-up period, 24.3% of the patients (95% CI 10.1%-36.3%) experienced PEG-J-related AE already within the first days after the PEG-J insertion. Cox model revealed that older patients had higher probability of psychosis, PEG-J- and device-related AEs (p < .05, p < .05, and p = .02) and suggested increased recurrence risk in those with early PEG-J and device-related AEs. Despite relatively high incidence of AEs, HRQoL significantly increased in the follow-up period (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: AEs related to LCIG treatment are common. Therefore, careful patient selection and monitoring throughout the treatment is recommended, especially in those with early side effects. Nevertheless, LCIG significantly improves HRQoL in advanced PD patients on a long term.

[Triple combination of levodopa, carbidopa and entacapone by intrajejunal pump in advanced Parkinson's disease]. / Levodopa-entakapon-karbidopa intestinalis gélinfúzió elorehaladott Parkinson-kórban ­ Új kezelési lehetoség intrajejunalis levodopa adagolására.

In advanced Parkinson's disease, oral medication can often no longer achieve sufficient therapeutic success. As one of the device aided therapies, the intrajejunal levo-dopa administration has been established as valuable treatment option. A modern form of the well-known intestinal levodopa pump offers the opportunity to continue the oral triple combination of levodopa, carbidopa and entacapone that many patients already use. Since February 2021 this modern option is available in Austria and Germany which also contains entacapone, whereby levo-dopa can be saved. In many other countries, including Hungary, approval is expected in the near future. The pump and cartridge are significantly smaller and lighter than in the LCIG pump which should improve the accep-tance of the therapy. The higher acceptance of the smaller pump and the improved user-friendliness has already been reported in an observational study from Sweden. The unwanted effects of entacapone have to be considered.

Managing Advanced Parkinson Disease.

Advanced Parkinson disease (PD) is associated with treatment-related motor fluctuations and reduced ability to perform activities of daily living. Progression of non-motor symptoms and medication-induced adverse effects complicate focused approach to motor symptom management, frequently accelerating reduced quality of life. It is thus critical for clinicians to consider disease progression versus therapeutic contributions when balancing management decisions. Such an approach requires careful recognition of inflection points resulting from therapeutic decisions and should prompt consideration of reduced pharmacologic burden and increased reliance on non-pharmacologic strategies in advanced disease. The successful approach to advanced PD requires a multidisciplinary effort focused on improving the patient's and family's quality of life, sometimes requiring sacrifice of motor symptom benefit. Here, we emphasize management strategies in advanced PD, focusing on the need to balance the therapeutic approach across advancing motor symptoms, progressive non-motor features, and potential pharmacologic adverse effects.

Comprehensive assessment of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel for Turkish advanced Parkinson's disease patients

Background/aim: Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) is an effective treatment modality in the management of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) despite frequent adverse events and different rates of dropouts. Efficacy and safety data regarding Turkish patients on LCIG are limited. This study aims to report in detail the efficacy and adverse effect profile of LCIG among advanced PD patients from a Turkish center for movement disorders. Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients (50% male) who started receiving LCIG between December 2014 and March 2020 were recruited. The efficacy of LCIG was assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III), Clinical Global Improvement (CGI) scale, and Quality of Life scale (PDQ8). Improvements in gait disorders and nonmotor features were also questioned. Adverse events (AE) were collated into 3 topics: related to percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J), device-related, and LCIG infusion-related. Results: Mean age and pre-LCIG disease duration were 66.7 (8.8) and 13.3 (8.0) years respectively. UPDRS III scores and H-Y scale assessments significantly improved. Better quality of life scores, clinical global improvements, and improvements in dysarthria, dysphagia, and gait were observed. None of our patients dropped out or died during a mean 17.5-month (12.3) period. Overall 20 (90.9%) patients experienced at least one AE. Twelve patients had PEG-J­related complications; three had acute abdomen. Eight (36.4%) patients had device-associated problems. Half of the patients required at least one additional endoscopic procedure and 7 had a device replaced. Mean body weight decreased from 69.5 to 62.5 kg and seven patients had newly onset PNP at a follow-up electromyography. Dyskinesia related to LCIG infusion was observed in 5 (22.7%) patients. There was no significant increase in hallucination among patients. Conclusion: LCIG is an efficient treatment modality in the management of Turkish patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Although most of the patients had at least one AE, none of them dropped out. Patient selection, patient compliance, and collaborative management are important steps affecting the success of modality.

[Advanced Parkinson's disease characteristics in clinical practice: Results from the OBSERVE-PD study and sub-analysis of the Hungarian data]. / Az elôrehaladott Parkinson-kór jellemzôi a klinikai gyakorlatban: az OBSERVE-PD vizsgálat eredményei és a magyarországi alcsoport elemzése.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The majority of patients with advanced Parkinson's disease are treated at specialized movement disorder centers. Currently, there is no clear consensus on how to define the stages of Parkinson's disease; the proportion of Parkinson's patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, the referral process, and the clinical features used to characterize advanced Parkinson's disease are not well delineated. The primary objective of this observational study was to evaluate the proportion of Parkinson's patients identified as advanced patients according to physician's judgment in all participating movement disorder centers across the study. Here we evaluate the Hungarian subset of the participating patients. METHODS: The study was conducted in a cross-sectional, non-interventional, multi-country, multi-center format in 18 countries. Data were collected during a single patient visit. Current Parkinson's disease status was assessed with Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts II, III, IV, and V (modified Hoehn and Yahr staging). Non-motor symptoms were assessed using the PD Non-motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS); quality of life was assessed with the PD 8-item Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PDQ-8). Parkinson's disease was classified as advanced versus non-advanced based on physician assessment and on questions developed by the Delphi method. RESULTS: Overall, 2627 patients with Parkinson's disease from 126 sites were documented. In Hungary, 100 patients with Parkinson's disease were documented in four movement disorder centers, and, according to the physician assessment, 50% of these patients had advanced Parkinson's disease. Their mean scores showed significantly higher impairment in those with, versus without advanced Parkinson's disease: UPDRS II (14.1 vs. 9.2), UPDRS IV Q32 (1.1 vs. 0.0) and Q39 (1.1 vs. 0.5), UPDRS V (2.8 vs. 2.0) and PDQ-8 (29.1 vs. 18.9). CONCLUSION: Physicians in Hungarian movement disorder centers assessed that half of the Parkinson's patients had advanced disease, with worse motor and non-motor symptom severity and worse QoL than those without advanced Parkinson's disease. Despite being classified as eligible for invasive/device-aided treatment, that treatment had not been initiated in 25% of these patients.

Neuromelanin or DaT-SPECT: which is the better marker for discriminating advanced Parkinson's disease?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whether the neuromelanin-positive substantia nigra pars compacta area (NM-SNc) on neuromelanin magnetic resonance imaging (NM-MRI) and the specific binding ratio (SBR) on 123 I-N-v-fluoropropyl-2b-carbomethoxy3b-(4-iodophenyl)nortropane single photon emission computed tomography (DaT-SPECT) can be correlated with motor fluctuations (MFs) in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) was investigated. METHODS: Thirty-five PD patients (60 ± 13 years) and 23 healthy individuals as controls (59 ± 19 years) were enrolled. The relationships between NM-MRI and DaT-SPECT were prospectively examined in two subgroups divided according to the presence or absence of MFs. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard model to screen for association factors. RESULTS: The NM-SNc size was correlated with the SBR (Spearman's ρ = 0.43, P < 0.05). The NM-SNc size was significantly reduced in PD with MFs compared with the subgroup without (P < 0.001), whereas the SBR did not significantly differ between the groups. NM-SNc size was a significant association factor for MFs (hazard ratio 0.94, P = 0.04). In receiver operating characteristic analysis of the factors for MF occurrence, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the NM-SNc size showed a significant difference of 0.89 (P < 0.05) but no significant difference was found in the SBR. CONCLUSIONS: NM-SNc size was significantly correlated with the SBR in PD, but several factors in advanced PD were more closely associated with NM-SNc size than the SBR. NM-MRI might reflect the status of advanced PD more accurately than DaT-SPECT. Therefore, NM-MRI appears to provide a better marker for discriminating advanced PD than DaT-SPECT.

Characterizing advanced Parkinson's disease: OBSERVE-PD observational study results of 2615 patients.

BACKGROUND: There are currently no standard diagnostic criteria for characterizing advanced Parkinson's disease (APD) in clinical practice, a critical component in determining ongoing clinical care and therapeutic strategies, including transitioning to device-aided treatment. The goal of this analysis was to determine the proportion of APD vs. non-advanced PD (non-APD) patients attending specialist PD clinics and to demonstrate the clinical burden of APD. METHODS: OBSERVE-PD, a cross-sectional, international, observational study, was conducted with 2615 PD patients at 128 movement disorder centers in 18 countries. Motor and non-motor symptoms, activities of daily living, and quality-of-life end points were assessed. The correlation between physician's global assessment of advanced PD and the advanced PD criteria from a consensus of an international group of experts (Delphi criteria for APD) were evaluated. RESULTS: According to physician's judgment, 51% of patients were considered to have APD. There was a moderate correlation between physician's judgment and Delphi criteria for APD (K = 0.430; 95% CI 0.406-0.473). Activities of daily living, motor symptom severity, dyskinesia duration/disability, "Off" time duration, non-motor symptoms, and quality-of-life scores were worse among APD vs. non-APD patients (p < 0.0001 for all). APD patients (assessed by physicians) had higher disease burden by motor and non-motor symptoms compared with non-APD patients and a negative impact on activities of daily living and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: These findings aid in identifying standard APD classification parameters for use in practicing physicians. Improvements in identification of APD patients may be particularly relevant for optimizing treatment strategies including transitioning to device-aided treatment.

Validating the Parkinson's disease caregiver burden questionnaire (PDCB) in German caregivers of advanced Parkinson's disease patients.

BACKGROUND: Advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) may place a high burden on patients and their caregivers. Understanding the determinants of caregiver burden is of critical importance. This understanding requires the availability of adequate assessment tools. Recently, the Parkinson's disease caregiver burden questionnaire (PDCB) has been developed as a PD-specific measure of caregiver burden. However, the PDCB has only been evaluated in a sample of Australian caregivers of patients at a less advanced stage of the disease. OBJECTIVE: We tested whether a German translation of the PDCB qualifies as an adequate measure of caregiver burden in a German sample of caregivers of advanced patients with PD. METHODS: We collected PDCB data from 65 caregivers of advanced patients with PD. Reliability of the scale was assessed and compared against the original version. To validate the German version of the PDCB, we examined the correlations with the caregiver burden inventory (CBI), the short form 36 health survey (SF-36), the Parkinson's disease quality of life questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39), disease duration, and the amount of caregiving time. RESULTS: The total PDCB score proved to be reliable and to be significantly related to CBI and SF-36 scores. PDCB scores also increased with increasing amounts of caregiving time. CONCLUSIONS: The German version of the PDCB appears to be an adequate measure of caregiver burden in caregivers of advanced PD patients.

Symptom progression in advanced Parkinson's disease: Dyadic perspectives.

This qualitative descriptive study investigated the self-reported symptoms of people with advanced Parkinson's disease. Fifteen dyads (person with Parkinson's and family caregiver) participated in two semi-structured interviews over a six-month time period; content analysis was used to explore the progression and new onset of symptoms. Reported symptoms in descending order included gait deterioration, falls, speech impairment, cognitive decline, functional decline, gastrointestinal and genitourinary changes, and swallowing impairment. The presence of multiple, compounding symptoms present challenges for maintaining safety in the home, highlighting the need for in-home services to assist with symptom management. Change in self-reported symptom experience was not significantly different after a six-month time frame. Symptom progression in advanced Parkinson's disease may take longer than six months to appreciatively manifest. Therefore, future research should explore the progression of advanced Parkinson's disease longitudinally over of period of time that exceeds six months.

Managing Gait, Balance, and Posture in Parkinson's Disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postural instability and gait difficulties inexorably worsen with Parkinson's disease (PD) progression and become treatment resistant, with a severe impact on autonomy and quality of life. We review the main characteristics of balance instability, gait disabilities, and static postural alterations in advanced PD, and the available treatment strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: It remains very difficult to satisfactorily alleviate gait and postural disturbances in advanced PD. Medical and surgical interventions often fail to provide satisfactory or durable alleviation of these axial symptoms, that may actually call for differential treatments. Exercise and adapted physical activity programs can contribute to improving the patients' condition. Gait, balance, and postural disabilities are often lumped together under the Postural Instability and Gait Difficulties umbrella term. This may lead to sub-optimal patients' management as data suggest that postural, balance, and gait problems might depend on distinct underlying mechanisms. We advocate for a multidisciplinary approach from the day of diagnosis.