Prevention of allergic reactions during oxaliplatin desensitization through inhibition of Bruton tyrosine kinase.

BACKGROUND: Acute infusion reactions to oxaliplatin, a chemotherapeutic used to treat gastrointestinal cancers, are observed in about 20% of patients. Rapid drug desensitization (RDD) protocols often allow the continuation of oxaliplatin in patients with no alternative options. Breakthrough symptoms, including anaphylaxis, can still occur during RDD. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate whether pretreatment with acalabrutinib, a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, can prevent anaphylaxis during RDD in a patient sensitized to oxaliplatin. METHODS: A 52-year-old male with locally advanced gastric carcinoma developed anaphylaxis during his fifth cycle of oxaliplatin. As he required 6 additional cycles to complete his curative-intent treatment regimen, he underwent RDD to oxaliplatin but still developed severe acute reactions. The risks and benefits of adding acalabrutinib before and during RDD were reviewed, and the patient elected to proceed. RESULTS: With acalabrutinib taken before and during the RDD, the patient was able to tolerate oxaliplatin RDD without complication. Consistent with its mechanism of action, acalabrutinib completely blocked the patient's positive skin prick response to oxaliplatin. Acalabrutinib did not alter the percentage of circulating basophils (1.24% vs 0.98%) before the RDD but did protect against basopenia (0.74% vs 0.09%) after the RDD. Acalabrutinib was associated with a drastic reduction in the ability of basophils to upregulate CD63 in vitro following incubation with oxaliplatin (0.11% vs 2.38%) or polyclonal anti-human IgE antibody (0.08% vs 44.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Five doses of acalabrutinib, 100 mg, orally twice daily starting during the evening 2 days before and continuing through RDD allowed a sensitized patient to receive oxaliplatin successfully and safely.

Infusion Reactions in HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer: Switching from Trastuzumab to Its Biosimilar.

This study presents a safety analysis of infusion reactions (IRs) in gastric cancer patients who switched from reference trastuzumab to its biosimilar, trastuzumab-NK, at the Saitama Cancer Center in Japan from April 2018 to March 2022. IRs were identified if patients developed symptoms such as fever, chills, infusion-related reactions, hypersensitivity, rash, pruritus, urticaria, systemic disorders, or immune system disorders on the day of administration or the following day. The incidence of IRs was 14% in the reference trastuzumab group, 33% in the trastuzumab-NK group, and 33% in the switching group. There was no significant difference in IR incidence between the reference trastuzumab and trastuzumab-NK groups (p = 0.235). Among the switching group, only one of the three patients who experienced an IR had a reaction associated with the switch. These findings suggest that the frequency of IRs in the switching group gastric cancer is comparable to the other groups, indicating that switching is a viable treatment option with appropriate management. Additionally, 37 of the 45 patients in the study were male, provides new safety information on switching in gastric cancer for male patients that has not been previously reported.

Impact of institutional interventions on the rate of paclitaxel hypersensitivity reactions.

PURPOSE: Paclitaxel is associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Intravenous premedication regimens have been devised to decrease the incidence and severity of HSRs. At our institution oral histamine 1 receptor antagonists (H1RA) and histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) were adopted as standard. Standardizations were implemented for consistent premedication use in all disease states. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the incidence and severity of HSRs before and after standardization. METHODS: Patients who received paclitaxel from 20 April 2018 to 8 December 2020 having an HSR were included in analysis. An infusion was flagged for review if a rescue medication was administered after the start of the paclitaxel infusion. The incidences of all HSR prior to and post-standardization were compared. A subgroup analysis of patients receiving paclitaxel for the first and second time was performed. RESULTS: There were 3499infusions in the pre-standardization group and 1159infusions in the post-standardization group. After review, 100 HSRs pre-standardization and 38 HSRs post-standardization were confirmed reactions. The rate of overall HSRs was 2.9% in the pre-standardization group and 3.3% in the post-standardization group (p = 0.48). HSRs, during the first and second doses of paclitaxel, occurred in 10.2% of the pre-standardization and 8.5% of the post-standardization group (p = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective interventional study demonstrated that same-day intravenous dexamethasone, oral H1RA, and oral H2RA are safe premedication regimens for paclitaxel. No change in the severity of reactions was seen. Overall, better adherence to premedication administration was seen post-standardization.

Meperidine compared to morphine for rigors associated with monoclonal antibody-related infusion reactions.

INTRODUCTION: Infusion reactions, characterized by symptoms such as rigors, fever, and hypotension, are common adverse events that occur during monoclonal antibody (MAB) therapy. The treatment of rigors often involves opioids, most commonly meperidine, despite limited evidence supporting use in the setting of MAB infusions. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous (IV) meperidine and morphine is treatment of MAB-related rigors, filling a significant gap in the literature. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study which reviewed patients either inpatient or within outpatient infusion centers from January 2015 to January 2024. Patients receiving IV 2 mg morphine or 25 mg meperidine for MAB-related rigors were included. The primary outcome was defined as the number of opioid doses required for rigors ablation. Secondary outcomes included rates of naloxone administration and documented sedation. RESULTS: A total of 1251 administration events were screened, of which 127 and 26 rigor events were in the meperidine and morphine cohorts, respectively, were included. A majority of both cohorts required only one dose of either agent for rigors ablation with <20% of either cohort requiring 2 or more doses (p = 0.539). Low rates of sedation were observed in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both meperidine and morphine effectively manage MAB-related rigors within minimal safety concerns. These findings suggest that morphine is a suitable alternative to meperidine for this indication, which may influence future formulary decision, provide alternatives for drug shortage, and optimize supportive care for patients undergoing MAB therapy.

Rapid rituximab administration: Safety of 60-minute infusions in malignant and benign haematological disease.

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody used to treat a range of malignant and benign haematological conditions. To minimise the risk of infusion-related toxicity, initial infusions are administered slowly over 4-6 h. In the absence of significant reactions, subsequent doses are often administered over an off-label rate of 90 min. In response to emergent data, our site adopted the use of rapid 60-min infusions for third and subsequent doses. This study aimed to review the safety and ongoing feasibility of 60-min rituximab infusions following institutional practice change. METHODS: Pharmacy dispensing records were used to identify all rituximab infusions dispensed under the direction of a haematologist between 1 January 2023 and 30 June 2023. Electronic medical records were reviewed retrospectively to characterise the incidence of infusion reactions. RESULTS: Eight-two patients received a total of 262 rituximab infusions, including 54 patients who received a total of 113 rapid 60-min infusions. No infusion-related reactions were observed with 60-min administration. Five patients who experienced grade 1-2 infusion reactions with their first or second dose of rituximab safely received 60-min infusions for third and subsequent doses without additional premedication. Indications for treatment included non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (76.99%), non-malignant disease states (17.70%), chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (3.54%) and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (1.77%). CONCLUSION: In the absence of severe reactions to initial and second doses, administration of rituximab over 60 min is well tolerated in patients with malignant and benign haematological disease.

Efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of abatacept in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). METHODS: Studies published between 2000 and 2021 were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ichushi-Web and clinical trial registries. The risk of bias was assessed according to the manual for development clinical practice guidelines by Minds, a project to promote evidence-based medicine in Japan. RESULTS: Seven observational studies were included. American College of Rheumatology pediatric 30/50/70 responses at 3, 6 and 12 months were 64.8%/50.3%/27.9%, 85.7%/71.4%/42.9% and 80.0%/50.0%/40.0%, respectively. Outcomes on systemic symptoms, joint symptoms and activities of daily living were not obtained. No macrophage activation syndrome or infusion reaction occurred. Serious infection occurred in 2.6% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept improved the disease activity index. In addition, abatacept was as safe as interleukin-6 (IL -6) and IL-1 inhibitors. However, both the efficacy and safety data in this systematic review should be reviewed with caution because their quality of evidence is low or very low. Further studies are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic JIA, especially its efficacy on joint symptoms.

Risk Factors for Infusion Reactions in Patients with Breast Cancer Administered Trastuzumab Therapy.

Trastuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) that is indicated for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. The administration of biologics, such as trastuzumab, frequently causes infusion reactions (IRs) with fever and chills. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors for IRs in trastuzumab therapy. Between March 2013 and July 2022, 227 patients with breast cancer who started trastuzumab therapy were included in this study. The severity of IRs was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0. The incidence of IRs in trastuzumab therapy was 27.3% (62/227). Dexamethasone administration was significantly different between the IR and non-IR groups in patients receiving trastuzumab therapy (univariate analysis, p < 0.001; multivariate analysis, p = 0.0002). Without dexamethasone, the severity of IRs in the pertuzumab combination group (Grade 1, 8/65; Grade 2, 23/65) was significantly higher than that in the non-pertuzumab group (Grade 1, 9/37; Grade 2, 3/37; p < 0.05). Our findings suggest that the risk of IRs is significantly higher in patients not premedicated with dexamethasone in trastuzumab therapy and that the concomitant use of pertuzumab without dexamethasone increases the severity of IRs caused by trastuzumab.

Etoposide hypersensitivity reactions associated with in-line filter use: A retrospective cohort study at CHU de Québec-Université Laval.

INTRODUCTION: A case series of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) during intravenous administration of etoposide was observed following the introduction of in-line filters (ILFs) at a specialized university-affiliated center. This raised questions about the possible involvement of filters in these reactions. Despite there being very little published evidence to inform clinical decision making in this potentially clinically significant situation, the use of ILFs was discontinued at this center pending further investigation. The aims of this study were to evaluate the cumulative incidence of etoposide-related HSR with and without the use of ILF and to describe the reactions in adult and pediatric patients with cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed among all pediatric and adult patients treated with intravenous etoposide at a maximal concentration of 0.4 mg/mL at our center between 30 September 2015 and 16 August 2018. This covered periods of time during which ILFs were used, as well as 6 months before their implementation and after their withdrawal. Data were extracted from medical records and cumulative incidence was calculated for each of the time periods (pre-ILF, ILF, and post-ILF) as the proportion of patients who recorded an HSR (one or more). Confidence intervals were calculated for each proportion using Fisher's Exact 95%. Comparisons of proportions between time periods were performed using Exact Pearson Chi-squared tests. Data were stratified by a number of perfusion cycles (single cycle or multiple cycles) and by patient population (adult and pediatric). RESULTS: A total of 284 patients were included in the study. The overall cumulative incidence of etoposide HSR was 9.9%. The cumulative incidence of HSR tended to be higher during ILF use when compared with combined pre- and post-ILF periods (12.2% [95% CI: 7.9-17.8] vs. 5.2% [95% CI: 1.7-11.7], p = 0.09). In patients who received multiple cycles of etoposide, the cumulative incidence of HSRs was higher during ILF use when compared with combined pre- and post-ILF periods (15.0% [95% CI: 9.6-21.8] vs. 3.9% [95% CI: 0.8-11.0], p = 0.01). The majority of HSRs' maximal severity were grade 1 or 2 (85.7%) according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a link between the use of ILFs and increased incidence of HSR during etoposide perfusion.

Allergy in Cancer Care: Antineoplastic Therapy-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions.

As the backbone of oncological treatments, systemic chemotherapy is still one of the main pawns in cancer care, alone or in combination with newer targeted agents. All chemotherapy agents can be associated with a type of adverse event called an infusion reaction, which can be characterized as unpredictable, non-dose related, and unexplained by the cytotoxic profile of the drug. For some of these events, a certain immunological mechanism can be identified by blood or skin testing. In this case, we can speak of true hypersensitivity reactions that occur as a response to an antigen/allergen. The current work summarizes the main antineoplastic therapy agents and their susceptibility to induce hypersensitivity reactions and also includes a review of clinical presentation, diagnostic methods in hypersensitivity reactions, and perspectives to overcome these negative events in the treatment of patients suffering from various types of cancer.

Incidence and associated factors of cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity infusion reactions in 1392 cancer patients treated in four French areas: a possible association with Lyme disease?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have observed an increased incidence of Cetuximab-induced hypersensitivity infusion reactions (CI-IRs) in the southeastern states of the USA. Tick's bites were suspected of generating cross-reactions between cetuximab and alpha-gal. This study aims was to describe the incidence and associated risk factors of CI-IRs, in the French areas chosen according to their Lyme disease incidence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients that received cetuximab infusion from January 2010 to June 2019 in 4 French areas with different Lyme disease incidence rates. RESULTS: Of 1392 patients, 117 (8.4%) experienced a CI-IR, including 68 severe (grade 3 or 4) reactions (4.9%). This CI-IR incidence was significantly higher in the Lyme disease high-risk area than in the other areas (13.2% versus 7.1%, 8.1% and 6.4%; P = 0.016). Sex (P = 0.53), premedication (P = 0.91), primary cancer location (P = 0.46) and chemotherapy regimen type (P = 0.78) had no impact on CI-IR incidence in the overall population. In the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patient subgroup, CI-IRs were significantly more frequent in the high-risk area (16.4% versus 6.7%, 7.1% and 7.0%; P = 0.0015). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients treated in the French area with the highest incidence of Lyme disease are at a higher risk of CI-IRs.

Sotrovimab use in Japanese inpatients with COVID-19: post-infusion adverse events.

BACKGROUND: Sotrovimab neutralizing SARS-CoV-2 remained effective at the advent of B.1 lineage of the Omicron variant in outpatients. Primarily for hospitalized patients, however, the Japanese government regulated to administer this antibody agent. As this regulation enabled close monitoring in inpatients to investigate post-infusion adverse events (AEs) and efficacy, we attempted a retrospective study while the Omicron BA.1 lineage was dominant regionally. METHODS: Subjects were inpatients with COVID-19 who received infusion of sotrovimab in our institute. In line with previous clinical trials, we included patients at risk of COVID-19 worsening and SARS-CoV-2 vaccinees, who were hospitalized as directed by the government. For statistical analyses, we reviewed background factors of demographics, imaging, and laboratory findings for the outcome infusion-related reactions including post-infusion pyrexia over 38 degrees Celsius and/or pulse oximetry below 94%. RESULTS: In a total of 139 patients, the follow-up period had a median of 200 days (range, 154-248 days). Among 119 patients (85.6%) fully vaccinated for SARS-CoV-2, 86 (61.9% of all) underwent 2 doses while 33 (23.7% of all) received 3 doses. For the outcome of pyrexia and/or dyspnea (N = 40, 28.8%), multivariate analysis showed that significant risk factors were pre-infusion lowered oximetry below 96.5% (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.344, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.139-0.851, P = 0.021) and pre-infusion temperature more than 36.7 degrees Celsius (OR 4.056, 95% CI 1.696-9.701, P = 0.002). Infusion-related reactions included vomiting immediately after infusion, chill/shivering, dizziness, rash, pruritus, pyrexia, and dyspnea. The number of patients with any of these events was 44 (31.6%). Three patients (2.2%) showed worsening of COVID-19; one developed hypoxia and two died. Limitations for this study included no genome typing whether BA.1 or BA.2 lineage of the Omicron variant but the local epidemiology indicated the prevalence of BA.1. Another was sotrovimab administration for inpatients that allow precise detection of post-infusion events, confounding previous exacerbation definition including hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: For 24 h after infusion of sotrovimab, COVID-19 patients showing pre-infusion lowered oximetry below 96.5% and/or temperature more than 36.7 degrees Celsius may have temperature elevation or dyspnea, warranting close monitoring for these risk factors.

Hypersensitivity reactions to asparaginase therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: immunology and clinical consequences.

Asparaginase is commonly used in combination therapy of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. However, as an immunogenic protein, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) during asparaginase therapy are frequent, indicating the development of anti-asparaginase antibodies. These can be associated with diminished clinical effectiveness, including poorer survival. Therapeutic drug monitoring of serum asparaginase activity to confirm complete asparagine depletion is therefore crucial during asparaginase therapy. Switching to alternative types of asparaginase is recommended for patients experiencing HSRs or silent inactivation; those with HSRs or silent inactivation on Escherichia coli-derived asparaginases should switch to another preparation. However, prior global shortages of Erwinia asparaginase highlight the importance of alternative non-E. coli-derived asparaginase, including recombinant Erwinia asparaginase.

Asparaginase is commonly used as a part of a multidrug regimen for acute lymphoblastic leukemia treatment. As foreign proteins, asparaginases have the potential to induce immune responses known as hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which can range from a mild rash to a severe allergic reaction. Here, we provide an overview of HSRs and their prevalence in asparaginase-based therapies, and clinical approaches to reduce HSRs. We also review the current understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms of HSRs, consequences of HSRs and current recommendations for the management of immune reactions to asparaginase. Prior global shortages of Erwinia asparaginase due to manufacturing and supply issues have limited access of asparaginase treatment to patients. In this context, newer therapies have recently been developed.

Impact of electronic interventions on guideline concordant ordering of rituximab infusion rate.

INTRODUCTION: Rituximab carries a boxed warning for severe or fatal infusion reactions; most occurring with the initial infusion. Prior studies established that if the initial rituximab infusion is tolerated, subsequent infusions can be given safely over 90 min. The University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) did not have a standardized method to document infusion reactions for outpatient chemotherapy patients, making it challenging for providers to know a patients' eligibility for rapid infusion. This quality improvement project focused on a series of interventions to improve documentation and electronic ordering of rituximab. METHODS: A flowsheet for nurses to record patients' tolerance of chemotherapy infusions was created within the electronic health record (EHR). Following results of flowsheet impact, a second intervention was implemented to modify ordering of rituximab. The primary endpoint was the incidence of guideline concordant rate ordering of rituximab. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of accurate chair time scheduling pre- and post-interventions and nursing compliance with flowsheet documentation. RESULTS: Prior to flowsheet implementation, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 79% post-implementation. Prior to modification of rituximab ordering in the EHR, 85% of patients were infused at the guideline concordant rate, compared to 87% after implementation. Complete nursing documentation was done 89% of the time when the flowsheet was utilized, compared to 11% pre-interventions. CONCLUSION: No difference in primary or secondary endpoints was found following our interventions. However, the infusion documentation flowsheet, when used, provided more complete reaction data compared to when it was not used.

Incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in patients on H1-receptor antagonists receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the incidence of hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy while on H1-receptor antagonists (H1RAs). Prophylaxis for patients receiving oxaliplatin is not currently recommended. H1RAs are used for the treatment of reactions; however, prophylactic H1RAs have not been well-studied. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included patients with solid tumor malignancies who received H1RAs while on oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy between August 1, 2016 and October 31, 2019. RESULTS: Of fifty-one patients, there were four hypersensitivity reactions (8%), most of which were mild, occurred within 60 minutes of the start of the infusion, and did not result in an interruption in treatment. One severe reaction occurred, which required discontinuation of therapy. Forty-two patients (82%) were able to receive at least 9 cycles of oxaliplatin without a reported reaction. CONCLUSION: In this observational study, the incidence rate of hypersensitivity reactions in patients receiving oxaliplatin while on H1RAs was lower than reported in previous literature. Most reactions were mild, and patients were able to continue oxaliplatin-based therapy. With future, randomized controlled trials, H1RAs may prove to be effective in preventing or delaying the onset of hypersensitivity reactions related to oxaliplatin.

Infusion reactions in natural killer cell immunotherapy: a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND AIMS: The use of natural killer (NK) cells as a cellular immunotherapy has increased over the past decade, specifically in patients with hematologic malignancies. NK cells have been used at the authors' institution for over 15 years. Most patients have a reaction to NK cell infusion. The authors retrospectively analyzed the reactions associated with NK cell infusions to characterize the types of reactions and investigate why some patients have higher-grade reactions than others. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of NK cell infusions was performed at the authors' institution under nine clinical protocols from 2008 to 2016. An infusion reaction was defined as any symptom from the time of NK cell infusion up to 4 h after infusion completion. The severity of infusion reactions was graded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. Two major endpoints of interest were (i) infusion reaction with any symptom and (ii) grade ≥3 infusion reaction. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between variables of interest and outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for each variable. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were receiving NK cell infusions at the authors' institution. The most common reported symptom was chills (n = 110, 85%), which were mostly grade 1 and 2, with only half of patients requiring intervention. There were 118 (91%) patients with infusion reactions, and only 36 (28%) were grade 3. There was one life-threatening grade 4 reaction, and no death was reported due to infusion reaction. Among grade ≥3 reactions, cardiovascular reactions (mainly hypertension) were the most common, and less than half of those with hypertension required intervention. NK cell dose was not associated with any of the grade 3 infusion reactions, whereas monocyte dose was associated with headache (grade ≤3, OR, 2.17, 95% CI, 1.19-3.97) and cardiovascular reaction (grade ≥3, OR, 2.13, 95% CI, 1.13-3.99). Cardiovascular reaction (grade ≥3) was also associated with in vitro IL-2 incubation and storage time. Additionally, there was no association between grade ≥3 infusion reactions and overall response rate (OR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.29-1.95). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients who receive NK cell therapy experience grade 1 or 2 infusion reactions. Some patients experience grade 3 reactions, which are mainly cardiovascular, suggesting that close monitoring within the first 4 h is beneficial. The association of monocytes with NK cell infusion reaction relates to toxicities seen in adoptive T-cell therapy and needs further exploration.

Infusion-related reaction to ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: An infusion-related reaction (IRR) is a well-known adverse event related to monoclonal antibodies, and antihistamine premedication is recommended to prevent IRRs. Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy is the standard second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Ramucirumab is a fully human antibody, suggesting that the incidence of IRRs is lower, however, the current recommendation for the proper use of ramucirumab is antihistamine premedication, but the incidence and severity of ramucirumab-induced IRR without antihistamine premedication have not been elucidated. METHODS: A retrospective study to evaluate the incidence of ramucirumab-induced IRRs in unresectable CRC patients treated by ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy. If the incidence of IRR without antihistamine premedication was not higher than that of cetuximab in a previous report (5.7%), planning a prospective study was considered. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients with unresectable CRC who had been treated by ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI therapy were identified. Of them, 106 (72%) patients received intravenous antihistamine premedication. An IRR occurred in 2 patients (1.4%), 1 grade 2 and 1 grade 3. They received antihistamine and steroid premedication. On the other hand, IRRs were not observed in 41 patients without antihistamine premedication, and the incidence of IRRs was significantly lower compared with the previous report of cetuximab (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ramucirumab-induced IRRs without antihistamine premedication is low. Not using antihistamine premedication can decrease medical costs. These findings warrant further investigation in large-scale cohorts to clarify the incidence and severity of ramucirumab-induced IRRs and further clarify the proper use of ramucirumab.

A multicenter review of infusion-related reactions to daratumumab for relapsed multiple myeloma in the real world setting.

BACKGROUND: Daratumumab is used in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. Daratumumab infusion-related reactions can occur with the highest incidence on the first infusion. METHODS: A retrospective review of all daratumumab infusions used as part of the DVd and DRd regimens for relapsed multiple myeloma was undertaken. The review of infusion-related reactions was conducted by reviewing the treatment room nursing note on the days that daratumumab was administered. If the patient experienced an infusion-related reaction, then the data captured included if the full dose was administered. RESULTS: Daratumumab infusion-related reactions occurred most frequently on the first dose. The rates of infusion-related reactions using a split dose approach for daratumumab administration were lower than that reported in clinical trials. All of the infusion-related reactions were managed with appropriate interventions in the outpatient setting. The adoption of rapid infusion daratumumab beginning with cycle 2 of DVd and DRd was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience of daratumumab infusions using a split dose approach was associated with an infusion-related reaction rate in 28% of patients on cycle 1, day 1 of DVd and DRd regimens. All patients were able to complete full doses of daratumumab by utilizing split dose. The rates of daratumumab infusion-related reactions are highest on the first infusion. In addition, our adoption of rapid infusion daratumumab was safe.

Localized muscle spasm as a manifestation of pembrolizumab-induced infusion reaction.

INTRODUCTION: As immune checkpoint inhibitors increasingly gain oncological utility, the incidence of unique adverse events may rise as well. The description and management of localized, recurrent muscle spasms secondary to pembrolizumab infusions has not previously been reported. CASE REPORT: A 64-year-old male receiving pembrolizumab infusions experienced acute-onset, isolated spasms and pain occurring in cycles 2 through 5.Management and outcome: Pretreatment with intravenous lorazepam, diphenhydramine, famotidine, ondansetron, and fluids have led to spasm-free pembrolizumab infusions. DISCUSSION: The purpose of this report is to provide the first known incidence and successful corrective measures taken for localized muscle spasms secondary to pembrolizumab infusion.

Premedication with montelukast and rupatadine decreased rituximab infusion time, rate, severity of reactions and use of rescue medications.

Rituximab-associated infusion reactions (IRs) are significant burdens on oncology patients, caregivers and healthcare providers. We evaluated whether montelukast and rupatadine improve rituximab delivery, decrease frequency/severity of IRs and the number of medications used to control IRs. Using a nonrandomized clinical study design, we assessed adult rituximab naïve patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies from January 2017 to July 2019. Prior to the first rituximab infusion patients received one of the premedication regimens: (i) standard premedications, diphenhydramine hydrochloride and acetaminophen ("SP" group); (ii) SP + montelukast ("M" group); (iii) SP + rupatadine ("R" group); (iv) SP + rupatadine + montelukast Schedule 1 ("M + R Schedule 1" group); (v) SP + rupatadine + montelukast Schedule 2 ("M + R Schedule 2" group). A total of 223 patients with a median age of 69 years were assessed. Demographics and treatment groups were comparable among all five groups. Mean rituximab infusion time was 290 min in the SP group versus 273, 261, 243 and 236 min in the M, R, M + R Schedule 1 and M + R Schedule 2 groups, respectively. The incidence of rituximab IRs was 75% in the SP group versus 44, 41, 22 and 22% in the M, R, M + R Schedule 1 and M + R Schedule 2 groups, respectively. The median reaction grade was 2 in the SP group and 0 in all other groups. The median number of rescue medications was 3 in the SP group and 0 in all other groups. In conclusion, montelukast and rupatadine significantly improved rituximab delivery, decreased the rate and severity of IRs and reduced the need for rescue medications.

Acute cardiotoxicity associated with alemtuzumab infusion for multiple sclerosis.

Alemtuzumab infusion is rarely associated with serious cardiac toxicity. We report a case of acute troponin-negative chest pain with dynamic T-wave changes, immediately following first infusion of alemtuzumab in a patient with multiple sclerosis. The chest pain and ECG (electrocardiogram) changes improved with cessation of alemtuzumab and conservative management. The presumed cause was infusion-associated cytokine release, but the precise mechanism is unknown.