Prebiotics counteract the morphological and functional changes secondary to chronic cisplatin exposition in the proximal colon of mice.

Cisplatin is an antimitotic drug able to cause acute and chronic gastrointestinal side effects. Acute side effects are attributable to mucositis while chronic ones are due to neuropathy. Cisplatin has also antibiotic properties inducing dysbiosis which enhances the inflammatory response, worsening local damage. Thus, a treatment aimed at protecting the microbiota could prevent or reduce the toxicity of chemotherapy. Furthermore, since a healthy microbiota enhances the effects of some chemotherapeutic drugs, prebiotics could also improve this drug effectiveness. We investigated whether chronic cisplatin administration determined morphological and functional alterations in mouse proximal colon and whether a diet enriched in prebiotics had protective effects. The results showed that cisplatin caused lack of weight gain, increase in kaolin intake, decrease in stool production and mucus secretion. Prebiotics prevented increases in kaolin intake, changes in stool production and mucus secretion, but had no effect on the lack of weight gain. Moreover, cisplatin determined a reduction in amplitude of spontaneous muscular contractions and of Connexin (Cx)43 expression in the interstitial cells of Cajal, changes that were partially prevented by prebiotics. In conclusion, the present study shows that daily administration of prebiotics, likely protecting the microbiota, prevents most of the colonic cisplatin-induced alterations.

Chronic intermittent hypoxia increases airway hyperresponsiveness during house dust mites exposures in rats.

INTRODUCTION: Accumulating clinical evidence links Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA) with worse outcomes of asthma, but impact on airway function remains sparsely studied. We tested effects of Chronic Intermittent Hypoxia (CIH) - a hallmark of OSA - on airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), in a rat model of chronic allergen-induced inflammation. METHODS: Brown Norway rats were exposed to six weeks of CIH or normoxia (NORM) concurrent with weekly house dust mites (HDM) or saline (SAL) challenges. At endpoint, we assessed responses to seven Methacholine (Mch) doses (0, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 mg/mL) on a FlexiVent system (Scireq). Maximal (or plateau) responses (reactivity) for total respiratory system Resistance (Rrs) and Elastance (Ers), Newtonian airway resistance (RN, a measure of central airways function) and tissue damping (G, a measure of distal airways function) were plotted. RESULTS: HDM/CIH-treated animals demonstrated the highest reactivity to Mch in Rrs and Ers compared to all other groups (HDM/NORM, SAL/CIH and SAL/NORM p < 0.05 for all comparisons, for doses 5-7 for Rrs, and for doses 4-7 for Ers). The enhanced Rrs response was due to an increase in G (doses 4-7, p < 0.05 for comparisons to all other groups), whereas RN was not affected by CIH. CONCLUSIONS: In rats chronically challenged with HDM, concurrent CIH exposure induces AHR primarily in the distal airways, which affects the respiratory system frequency-dependent elastic properties.

Obesity in women with asthma: Baseline disadvantage plus greater small-airway responsiveness.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is known to diminish lung volumes and worsen asthma. However, mechanistic understanding is lacking, especially as concerns small-airway responsiveness. The objective of this study was therefore to compare small-airway responsiveness, as represented by the change in expiratory:inspiratory mean lung density ratios (MLDe/i , as determined by computed tomography [CT]) throughout methacholine testing in obese versus non-obese women with asthma. METHODS: Thoracic CT was performed during methacholine bronchoconstriction challenges to produce standardized response curves (SRC: response parameter versus ln[1 + % PD20], where PD20 is the cumulative methacholine dose) for 31 asthma patients (n = 18 non-obese and n = 13 obese patients). Mixed models evaluated obesity effects and interactions on SRCs while adjusting for age and bronchial morphology. Small airway responsiveness as represented by SRC slope was calculated for each third of the MLDe/i response and compared between groups. RESULTS: Obesity-associated effects observed during experimental bronchoconstriction included: (i) a significant baseline effect for forced expiratory volume in 1 second with lower values for the obese (73.11 ± 13.44) versus non-obese (82.19 ± 8.78; p = 0.002) groups prior to methacholine testing and (ii) significantly higher responsiveness in small airways as estimated via differences in MLDe/i slopes (group×ln(1 + % PD20 interaction; p = 0.023). The latter were pinpointed to higher slopes in the obese group at the beginning 2/3 of SRCs (p = 0.004 and p = 0.021). Significant obesity effects (p = 0.035 and p = 0.008) indicating lower forced vital capacity and greater % change in MLDe/I (respectively) throughout methacholine testing, were also observed. CONCLUSION: In addition to baseline differences, small-airway responsiveness (as represented by the change in MLDe/i ) during methacholine challenge is greater in obese women with asthma as compared to the non-obese.

Severe bronchial hyperresponsiveness along with house dust mite allergy indicates persistence of asthma in young children.

BACKGROUND: Significant risk factors for persistence of asthma later in life are family history of allergies, early allergic sensitization and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). The evolution of BHR in young children without allergic sensitization and with house dust mite allergy (HDM) was investigated. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, electronic charts of 4850 young children with asthma and wheezy bronchitis between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed in order to study all patients ≤6 years with BHR assessed by methacholine provocation tests (MCT) at least once (n = 1175). Patients with more than two follow-up measurements were divided in group 1 (no allergic sensitization; n = 110) and group 2 (HDM allergy; n = 88). Additionally, skin prick test, exhaled nitrite oxide (eNO), and asthma treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients of group 1 aged median 4.3 years and 48 patients of group 2 aged median 4.7 years showed initially severe BHR <0.1 mg. At follow-up, patients with HDM were more likely to show persistence of severe BHR than non-sensitized patients (severe BHR group 1: n = 5 (10.6%) vs. group 2: n = 21 (43.8%), p < .001). In addition, 89.4% of group 1 had mild to moderate or no BHR, compared to only 56.2% of group 2. There was a significant difference in eN0 (median group 1: 9 ppb vs. group 2: 26 ppb, p < .001), at last follow-up. Age, sex, and asthma therapy had no effect on BHR. CONCLUSION: In young children without sensitization BHR normalizes, whereas HDM allergy indicates a persistence of asthma beyond infancy.

Beyond forced exhalation: impulse oscillometry as a promising tool for bronchial hyperresponsiveness evaluation.

Introduction: The multiple forced expiratory maneuvers that must be performed during methacholine test require a high degree of collaboration and can lead to fatigue. However, impulse oscillometry (IOS) is a noninvasive test, quick and easy to perform, that does not require effort-dependent maneuvers.Objectives: The primary endpoint was to evaluate the relationship between IOS and spirometry during the methacholine test. The secondary endpoint was to study the predictive value of baseline IOS in the development of bronchial hyperreactivity.Methods: Observational, prospective, cross-sectional study, with recruitment of consecutive patients from the pulmonology department with clinical suspicion of bronchial asthma with negative bronchodilator test and normal FeNO.Results: Twenty-five patients were included, with a mean age of 49 ± 18 years. Thirteen patients (52%) had a positive methacholine test. The correlation between IOS indices and FEV1 was significant (p < 0.05) in all cases. The indices with the highest predictive power were R5-20 and AX. The optimal cutoff points were an increase of greater than 32.96% in R5, greater than 120.83% for X5, an increase of 30.30 [kPa l-1s-1] in R5-20, and an increase of 1.01 [kPa l-1] for AX. Baseline oscillometry demonstrated a strong predictive value in the development of bronchial hyperreactivity, with a sensitivity of 61.5% and a specificity of 91.7%, using the cut-off point of 160.0% for R5.Conclusions: IOS may be a valuable alternative to forced spirometry in detecting bronchial hyperreactivity during the methacholine test, showing a good correlation between both tests.

Validation of the clinical utility of sGaw as a response variable in methacholine challenge testing.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is commonly assessed by a methacholine challenge test (MCT), during which a provocative concentration causing a 20% reduction in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ) (PC20 ) < 8 mg/ml is considered a positive response. However, a fall in specific airway conductance (sGaw) may also have clinical significance. The purpose of this study was to assess whether AHR determined by a provocative concentration causing a 40% reduction in sGaw (PC40 ) < 8 mg/ml corresponds to a clinical diagnosis of asthma. METHODS: We analysed the changes in spirometry, lung volumes and sGaw during MCT in 211 randomly selected patients being evaluated for AHR to support a clinical diagnosis of asthma. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of the group was 53 (15) years, with 141 women (67%). Overall lung function was normal, with FEV1  = 92 (15) % predicted, total lung capacity = 97 (13) % predicted and sGaw = 0.19 (0.15-0.23) L/s/cm H2 O/L, (median, 25-75 IQR). There were many more patients who responded by PC40 only (n = 120) than who responded by PC20 (n = 52). There was no significant difference in asthma diagnosis between the PC20 (98%) and PC40 (93%) groups, and we estimate 34% of patients with a diagnosis of asthma would have been classified as having no AHR if only the FEV1 criterion was used. CONCLUSION: Changes in sGaw during MCT indicate clinically significant AHR in support of a clinical diagnosis of asthma among patients being evaluated for asthma.

The cumulative effect of methacholine on large and small airways when deep inspirations are avoided.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The effect of serial incremental concentrations of methacholine is only slightly cumulative when assessed by spirometry. This limited cumulative effect may be attributed to the bronchodilator effect of deep inspirations that are required between concentrations to measure lung function. Using oscillometry, the response to methacholine can be measured without deep inspirations. Conveniently, oscillometry can also dissociate the contribution of large versus small airways. Herein, oscillometry was used to assess the cumulative effect of methacholine in the absence of deep inspirations on large and small airways. METHODS: Healthy and asthmatic volunteers underwent a multiple-concentration methacholine challenge on visit 1 and a single-concentration challenge on visit 2 using the highest concentration of visit 1. The maximal response was compared between visits to assess the cumulative effect of methacholine. The lung volume was also measured after the final concentration to assess hyperinflation. RESULTS: In both healthy and asthmatic subjects, increases in resistance at 19 Hz (Rrs19 ), reflecting large airway narrowing, did not differ between the multiple- and the single-concentration challenge. However, increases in resistance at 5 Hz (Rrs5 ) minus Rrs19 , reflecting small airway narrowing, were 117 and 270% greater in the multiple- than the single-concentration challenge in healthy (p = 0.006) and asthmatic (p < 0.0001) subjects, respectively. Hyperinflation occurred with both challenges and was greater in the multiple- than the single-concentration challenge in both groups. CONCLUSION: Without deep inspirations, the effect of methacholine is cumulative on small airways but not on large airways. Lung hyperinflation and derecruitment may partially explain these different responses.

Otilonium Bromide Prevents Cholinergic Changes in the Distal Colon Induced by Chronic Water Avoidance Stress, a Rat Model of Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Irritable Bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly widespread gastrointestinal disorder whose symptomatology mainly affect the large intestine. Among the risk factors, psychosocial stress is the most acknowledged. The repeated water avoidance stress (rWAS) is considered an animal model of psychosocial stress that is capable of mimicking IBS. Otilonium bromide (OB), which is orally administered, concentrates in the large bowel and controls most of the IBS symptoms in humans. Several reports have shown that OB has multiple mechanisms of action and cellular targets. We investigated whether the application of rWAS to rats induced morphological and functional alterations of the cholinergic neurotransmission in the distal colon and whether OB prevented them. The results demonstrated that rWAS affects cholinergic neurotransmission by causing an increase in acid mucin secretion, in the amplitude of electrically evoked contractile responses, abolished by atropine, and in the number of myenteric neurons expressing choline acetyltransferase. OB counteracted these changes and also showed an intrinsic antimuscarinic effect on the post-synaptic muscular receptors. We assume that the rWAS consequences on the cholinergic system are linked to corticotrophin-releasing factor-1 (CRF1) receptor activation by the CRF hypothalamic hormone. OB, by interfering with the CFR/CRFr activation, interrupted the cascade events responsible for the changes affecting the rWAS rat colon.

Can development of asthma and bronchial hyperreactivity be reduced by subcutaneous immunotherapy in adult patients with allergic rhinitis?

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis can be associated with bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) and create an increased risk for allergic asthma development. We aimed to investigate the effects of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) on BHR and asthma development in adult patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS: The retrospective case-control study was carried out between November 2018 and May 2019 in Süreyyapasa Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital. In this study, data was recorded for patients with a mite and/or grasses/cereals pollen allergy who were tested for BHR before planned SCIT, and who had allergic rhinitis, with or without asthma. The SCIT group was selected as those who received SCIT for at least one year. The control group was selected from those who were scheduled to receive SCIT but were waived and still receiving medication. Symptom scores, prick test results, PC20 levels (methacholine challenge that is a provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1), and the presence of asthma were recorded and compared with data from at least one year after treatment. RESULTS: A total of sixty-eight subjects (22 males, 46 females; mean age 40.54 ± 12.27 years; SCIT: 40, Control: 28) were enrolled.Although the changes in log PC20 levels were not statistically significant in both SCIT and control groups after an average of 30-35 months of treatment, it was found to be significant in favor of the SCIT group when two groups were compared in terms of the change in log PC20 (p = 0.026). The development and improvement of asthma were not significantly different between the SCIT and control group but tended to increase in the control group. The percentage of patients with progressed/BHR was significantly higher in the controls (70.6% vs. 38.1%, p = 0.046). DISCUSSION: In our real life study we have demonstrated the preventative effect of SCIT on BHR, but not on asthma developmen.

Predictors of Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Symptomatic Children with Normal Spirometry and Suspicious of Possible Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma diagnosis may be challenging particularly in patients with mild symptoms without an obstructive pattern in spirometry. Detection of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) by a positive methacholine challenge (MCC) is still an important diagnostic tool to confirm the presence of asthma with reasonable certainty. However, it is time consuming and could be exhausting for patients. We aimed to identify the predictive factors for AHR in children with respiratory symptoms without obstructive pattern in spirometry. METHODS: Data from children who had undergone MCC were analyzed retrospectively. The demographic features of patients along with laboratory results were collected. RESULTS: A total of 123 children with a median age of 10.5 years were enrolled. AHR was detected in 81 children (65.8%). The age of the children with AHR was significantly younger. The prevalences of aeroallergen sensitization, nocturnal cough, wheezing, and a baseline forced expiratory flow at 75% of vital capacity (FEF75) <65% were significantly more frequent in children with AHR. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed age, ever wheezing, nocturnal cough, tree pollen allergy, and FEF75 <65% as independent predictors of AHR. A weighted clinical risk score was developed (range, 0-75 points). At a cutoff point of 35, the presence of AHR is predicted with a specificity of 90.5% and a positive predictive value of 91.5%. CONCLUSION: In children suspected of having asthma, but without an obstructive pattern in the spirometry, combining independent predictors, which can be easily obtained in clinical practice, might be used to identify children with AHR.

Wheeze is an unreliable endpoint for bronchial methacholine challenges in preschool children.

BACKGROUND: Onset of wheeze is the endpoint often used in the determination of a positive bronchial challenge test (BCT) in young children who cannot perform spirometry. We sought to assess several clinical endpoints at the time of a positive BCT in young children with recurrent wheeze compared to findings in school-aged children with asthma. METHODS: Positive BCT was defined in: (1) preschool children (n = 22) as either persistent cough, wheeze, fall in oxygen saturation (SpO2 ) of ≥5%, or ≥50% increase in respiratory rate (RR) from baseline; and (2) school-aged children (n = 22) as the concentration of methacholine (MCh) required to elicit a 20% decline in FEV1 (PC20 ). RESULTS: All preschool children (mean age 3.4 years) had a positive BCT (median provocative MCh concentration 1.25 mg/ml [IQR, 0.62, 1.25]). Twenty (91%) school-aged children (mean age 11.3 years) had a positive BCT (median PC20 1.25 mg/ml [IQR, 0.55, 2.5]). At the time of the positive BCT, the mean fall in SpO2 (6.9% vs. 3.8%; p = .001) and the mean % increase in RR (61% vs. 22%; p < .001) were greater among preschool-aged than among school-aged children. A minority of children developed wheeze at time of positive BCT (23% preschool- vs. 15% school-aged children; p = .5). CONCLUSIONS: The use of wheeze as an endpoint for BCT in preschool children is unreliable, as it rarely occurs. The use of clinical endpoints, such as ≥25% increase in RR or fall in SpO2 of ≥3%, captured all of our positive BCT in preschool children, while minimizing undue respiratory distress.

Effect of daily dosing with tiotropium against methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatics.

INTRODUCTION: Loss of bronchoprotection against direct and indirect acting stimuli following regular use of inhaled beta2-agonists occurs with both short and long-acting formulations. Comparatively little is known about the development of tolerance following regular use of inhaled muscarinic receptor antagonists. Two investigations with the short-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist ipratropium bromide have reported no tolerance after regular use against inhaled methacholine. To our knowledge, there are no data regarding loss of bronchoprotection following regular use of long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist. We therefore looked at the effect of daily dosing with tiotropium on methacholine induced bronchoconstriction in a population of mild asthmatics. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study comparing tiotropium Respimat® 5 µg to placebo in adult asthmatics. Each treatment arm began with baseline methacholine challenge followed immediately by treatment administration. One hour later a post treatment methacholine challenge was performed. Participants dosed daily (two puffs) at home for the next six days and returned to the lab on Day 8 for a final dose of treatment 1 h prior to methacholine challenge. RESULTS: The average doubling dose increase in methacholine PD20 following a single dose of tiotropium was 3.9 doubling doses whereas that following placebo was 0.93 (p = 0.003). After regular use, methacholine PD20 was further increased to 6.4 doubling doses following tiotropium whereas that following placebo decreased by 0.57 doubling doses (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LAMA are indicated for use as add-on monotherapy or in triple therapy combination for poorly controlled asthma. It may be reassuring to know therefore, that regular use does not result in loss of bronchoprotection like that which occurs with beta2-agonist bronchodilators.

Blood eosinophils, FeNO and small airways dysfunction in predicting airway hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma-like symptoms.

PURPOSE: In patients with suspected asthma and no airflow limitation in spirometry, methacholine challenge testing (MCT) for airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is an option of documenting variable airflow limitation. The goal of the study was to assess the ability of blood eosinophils, fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and distal airways function to discriminate patients with AHR from those with normal airway responsiveness (AR). METHODS: We analyzed baseline data from 42 participants who underwent MCT because of asthma-like symptoms and no airflow limitation in spirometry. RESULTS: Eosinophil count was higher among participants with borderline AHR comparing to those with normal AR (340 cells/µL, IQR 285-995 vs. 125 cells/µL, IQR 75-180, post-hoc p = 0.041). FeNO and percent predicted of functional residual volume (FRC%pred) were higher in participants with moderate-marked AHR compared to those with normal AR (40 ppb, IQR 30.5-100.5 vs. 18 ppb, IQR 13-50, post-hoc p = 0.008; 140.1%±17.0% vs. 107.3%±20.7%, post-hoc p < 0.001, respectively). Percentage predicted of the maximal expiratory flow at 25% of the forced vital capacity (MEF25%pred) was lower in participants with mild AHR and borderline AHR compared to those with normal AR (72.9%±16.9% vs. 113.0%±36.8%, post-hoc p = 0.017; 73.3%±15.9% vs. 113.0%±36.8%, post-hoc p = 0.045; respectively). Level of AHR correlated with eosinophil count, FeNO, MEF25%pred, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75%pred), FRC%pred and specific airway resistance (sRaw). CONCLUSIONS: Blood eosinophils, FeNO and small airways dysfunction markers are related to the level of AR to methacholine in patients with asthma-like symptoms and no airflow limitation in spirometry.

Predictors of methacholine challenge testing results in subjects without airflow obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: Methacholine challenge testing (MCT) is considered when asthma remains clinically suspected despite normal spirometry. Few studies have attempted to determine the predictive factors of MCT results. We aimed to establish which demographic data, clinical symptoms, pulmonary function testing results, and laboratory values were associated with abnormal MCT (provocation concentration causing a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PC20) ≤ 16 mg/mL) in subjects without airflow obstruction on spirometry. METHODS: All patients who completed MCT at Montfort Hospital between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2018 were identified. Subjects with a reduced FEV1/FVC ratio were excluded. We used Pearson's chi-squared test and point-biserial correlation method to determine which variables had a significant relationship (p < 0.05) with MCT results. RESULTS: 23.3% of patients who underwent MCT had airflow limitation. In the 1126 subjects with a normal FEV1/FVC ratio, PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL was found in 13.0%. Younger age, female gender, body mass index ≥ 40, and reported wheezing were factors associated with increased probability of airway hyper responsiveness. Lower FEV1, significant improvement of the FEV1 post-bronchodilator, reduced FEF25%-75%, greater FEF25%-75% reversibility, airway resistance measurements above the upper limit of normal, and increased blood eosinophil counts were predictive of abnormal MCT. CONCLUSIONS: Only 13.0% of patients referred for MCT had a PC20 ≤ 16 mg/mL when the FEV1/FVC ratio was normal, highlighting the need to further define in which individuals this test is truly warranted. Further investigation is required to develop an easy-to-use and validated prediction model in order to better understand patients' pretest probability of abnormal MCT.

The Montelukast Therapy in Asthmatic Children with and without Food Allergy: Does It Make Any Difference?

INTRODUCTION: Children with food allergy are at increased risk for asthma and asthma morbidity. Since leukotrienes are implicated in the pathogenesis of both asthma and probably in food allergies, we hypothesized that asthmatic children with concomitant food allergy may have a favorable response to antileukotriene treatment. METHODS: Asthmatic children aged 6-18 years with and without food allergy were treated with montelukast and placebo in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over parallel-group study. The primary outcome of the study was improvement in FEV1%. Asthma control tests, spirometry and methacholine challenges were performed as well as Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) levels. PGD2, CystLT, and lipoxin levels were measured in exhaled breath condensate (EBC). RESULTS: A total of 113 children were enrolled and 87 completed the study in accordance with the protocol. At baseline, children with food allergy and asthma (FAA) had higher levels of PGD2 and CysLT levels in the EBC than children with asthma alone (AA) (p < 0.001 for each). In the montelukast arm, although FEV1% was significantly higher in the FAA group compared to AA (p = 0.005), this effect was linked to the baseline difference of FEV1% between both arms. Montelukast treatment failed to improve FEV1% in both groups compared to the placebo. No effect of montelukast was observed in the remaining study parameters. CONCLUSION: Although children with FAA do not show a more favorable response to montelukast treatment compared to AA, a significant difference between baseline PGD2 and CystLT levels between FAA and AA groups may point to a different endotype of childhood asthma.

Asthma and rhinitis in Greek furniture workers.

Objective: The detection of asthma and rhinitis in furniture workers exposed to chemicals in the area of Thessaloniki Greece and the determination of the most useful tests for diagnosing the above occupational diseases.Methods: Eighty-three workers (76 men), 35 exposed to chemicals (CW), 23 to wood dust (WW), and 25 office workers (OW), serving as controls, filled in a specialized European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) questionnaire for asthma and were submitted to clinical evaluation, spirometry, bronchodilation test, PEF computer algorithm OASYS-2, FeNO, skin prick tests (SPTs), rhinomanometry and methacholine inhalation challenge. Working conditions and protective measurements were also recorded. According to the results of all conducted tests, each subject was distributed to a subgroup: (a) normal, (b) asthma, (c) rhinitis, (d) asthma and rhinitis. Comparisons were performed among work groups.Results: The presence of asthma and/or rhinitis was higher among CW and WW compared to OW (p = 0.004). Significant differences among groups were observed in the questions «better weekend¼ (p < 0.034) and "improvement on vacation¼ (p < 0.000), in OASYS-2 Score (p < 0.000), in ABC Score (p < 0.000), and in methacholine score (p < 0.022). Rhinomanometry, FeNO, spirometry, and spirometry after bronchodilation had no significant differences among groups. Working conditions, ventilation system, work practice, use and type of mask revealed no significant differences.Conclusion: Asthma and rhinitis are significantly common among CW. Protective measurements used were not adequate to prevent asthma and or work related rhinitis. Early diagnosis might contribute to disease prevention and control.

Diagnostic value of the hypertonic saline bronchial provocation test in children with asthma using the high-power aerosol provocation system.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of the modified hypertonic saline bronchial provocation test (HS-BPT) for children with asthma by using the high-power Aerosol Provocation System (APS).Methods: A total of 330 children suspected of having asthma and receiving HS-BPT-APS were included in this prospective survey conducted in Guangzhou, China from February 2017 to September 2018. The positive rate of HS-BPT-APS and the volume and types of adverse reactions were observed. There was also a retrospective cohort of 123 children with suspected asthma who underwent a methacholine BPT from 2015 to 2017. Using the method of nearest neighbor matching, a comparison was made of the positive rate and adverse reaction between the methacholine BPT group and HS-BPT-APS group.Results: The total positive rate of HS-BPT-APS was 43.9%. Common adverse reactions included cough, wheezing and chest tightness. There were no serious adverse reactions. Results of nearest neighbor matching showed a difference in the positive rate between the methacholine BPT group and HS-BPT-APS group (8.1% vs 18.2%, p = 0.026), but there was no statistically significant difference between the age groups in patients who received the methacholine BPT or HS-BPT-APS. There was a similar adverse reaction rate in the two groups (p = 0.609).Conclusions: HS-BPT-APS is simple, safe, and time-saving, with few adverse reactions. The positive rate of HS-BPT-APS was higher than that of methacholine BPT in children with asthma. HS-BPT-APS may be a valuable tool in the diagnosis of children with asthma, and further study is required.

Utility and efficiency of methacholine challenge testing in evaluating pediatric asthma: unraveling the diagnostic conundrum.

OBJECTIVE: Interpretation of methacholine challenge testing (MCT) results depends on the patient's pretest probability of asthma as well as the provocative concentration (PC20); however, ordering providers rarely understand the complexity associated with its interpretation. This study investigated the clinical utility and efficiency of MCT at a tertiary center in evaluating pediatric asthma. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was done for all MCT done at a tertiary center over a six year period (2011-2017). Demographics, referring provider, referral diagnosis, current symptoms with and without exercise, and baseline spirometry were collected. Pretest probability of asthma was assigned by author (RB) who was blinded to MCT results and PC20. Post-test probability of asthma was assigned based on pretest probability, MCT result (+/-), and PC20. Three assigned asthma probability categories were "unlikely" "likely", and "very likely". RESULTS: Of 172 subjects (91 Females, age range 5-21 years), 64.9% of MCT results (n = 111)) were negative and 35.1% (n = 60)) were positive. One was inconclusive. Those who tested positive were shorter, lighter, younger and had lower forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio than those who tested negative (p < 0.05). Subjects with exercise symptoms only were less likely to test positive (OR 0.2, CI 0.1-0.5). In a majority of subjects (91.8%; 157/171), MCT increased the certainty of presence or absence of asthma. CONCLUSIONS: In our subject population, MCT could be useful in evaluating pediatric asthma if subject's pretest probability of asthma and PC20 was taken into account. It was not as useful for subjects with exercise symptoms only.

Elevated Th17 cell frequencies and Th17/Treg ratio are associated with airway hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic children.

Introduction: The elevation of T helper (Th)17 cell frequencies and the imbalance of Th17/regulatory T (Treg) cells occur in asthma pathogenesis. Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) is a cardinal feature of asthma, and Th17 responses can promote AHR. We hypothesized that changes in Th17 cells and the Th17/Treg ratio correlate with AHR in asthmatic children.Methods: Twenty asthmatic children and twenty healthy children were included in the study. The peak expiratory flow (PEF) % pred, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) % pred and the FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio were measured in all subjects. Methacholine challenge test (MCT) was performed in asthmatic children. Flow cytometric analysis was used to determine the proportions of Th17 and Treg cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. ELISA was used to assess serum levels of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-10.Results: Th17 cell frequencies (2.272 ± 0.207% in asthmatics, 1.193 ± 0.131% in controls, P < 0.01) and Th17/Treg ratios (0.371 ± 0.0387 in asthmatics, 0.183 ± 0.020 in controls, P < 0.01) were significantly increased in asthmatic children compared to controls. In asthmatic children, the MCT grade had positive correlations with the Th17 cell frequencies [r = 0.718, P < 0.01], serum IL-17A level [r = 0.753, P < 0.01] and Th17/Treg ratio [r = 0.721, P < 0.01], while the log10PD20-FEV1 value was negatively correlated with the Th17 cell frequencies [r = -0.654, P < 0.01], serum IL-17A level [r = -0.652, P < 0.01] and Th17/Treg ratio [r = -0.625, P < 0.01].Conclusion: Th17 cell, IL-17A and Th17/Treg ratio were positively correlated with AHR in asthmatic children. It may be helpful to monitor Th17 cells and the Th17/Treg ratio as indicators of AHR in clinical practice.

Diagnostic comparison of methacholine and mannitol bronchial challenge tests for identifying bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a representative feature of asthma. Although methacholine and mannitol are commonly used for bronchial challenge tests, the optimal roles of the two agents for assessing BHR remain unclear. We compared the diagnostic performance of methacholine and mannitol in bronchial challenge tests. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register. The sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and a hierarchical summary of the receiver-operating characteristic curve (HSROC) of the two agents for detecting BHR in asthma were pooled using meta-analysis. A meta-regression analysis was used to identify potential sources of heterogeneity within the selected studies. RESULTS: We identified six studies comprising 565 patients. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and DOR of methacholine were 0.61 (95%CI, 0.44-0.76), 0.93 (95%CI, 0.70-0.99), and 23.47 (95% CI, 2.51-219.89), respectively. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio of mannitol were 0.50 (95%CI, 0.28-0.73), 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94-0.99), and 35.22 (95% CI, 8.82-140.62), respectively. The area under the HSROC for mannitol was higher than that for methacholine (0.97 vs. 0.81, p < 0.01). Considerable between-study heterogeneity was present for sensitivity and specificity in studies of both index tests. Univariate meta-regression analysis revealed that age and sex of the study participants were probable sources of heterogeneity for specificity in studies of methacholine. CONCLUSION: Although mannitol showed better diagnostic performance than methacholine for identifying BHR in asthma, substantial between-study heterogeneity necessitates caution when interpreting the data.