Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(6): 3368-3377, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38710889

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an advanced technique for excision of early rectal cancers. Robotic TAMIS (r-TAMIS) has been introduced as technical improvement and potential alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) in early rectal cancers and in frail patients. This study reports the perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes of r-TAMIS for local excision of early-stage rectal cancers. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected r-TAMIS database (July 2021-July 2023). Demographics, clinicopathological features, short-term outcomes, recurrences, and survival were investigated. RESULTS: Twenty patients were included. Median age and body mass index were 69.5 (62.0-77.7) years and 31.0 (21.0-36.5) kg/m2. Male sex was prevalent (n = 12, 60.0%). ASA III accounted for 66.7%. Median distance from anal verge was 7.5 (5.0-11.7) cm. Median operation time was 90.0 (60.0-112.5) minutes. Blood loss was minimal. There were no conversions. Median postoperative stay was 2.0 (1.0-3.0) days. Minor and major complication rates were 25.0% and 0%, respectively. Seventeen (85.0%) patients had an adenocarcinoma whilst three patients had an adenoma. R0 rate was 90.0%. Most tumours were pT1 (55.0%), followed by pT2 (25.0%). One patient (5.0%) had a pT3 tumour. Specimen and tumour maximal median diameter were 51.0 (41.0-62.0) mm and 21.5 (17.2-42.0) mm, respectively. Median specimen area was 193.1 (134.3-323.3) cm2. Median follow-up was 15.5 (10.0-24.0) months. One patient developed local recurrence (5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: r-TAMIS, with strict postoperative surveillance, is a safe and feasible approach for local excision of early rectal cancer and may have a role in surgically unfit and elderly patients who refuse or cannot undergo TME surgery. Future prospective multicentre large-scale studies are needed to report the long-term oncological outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Masculino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Retrospectivos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Duração da Cirurgia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia
2.
Surg Endosc ; 37(5): 3398-3409, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36707419

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the advancement of transanal local excision, robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery is the newest development. In the confined area of the rectum, robot-assisted surgery should, theoretically, be superior due to articulated utensils, video enhancement, and tremor reduction, however, this has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to review the evidence reported to-date on experience of using robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery for treatment of rectal neoplasms. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of Embase and PubMed from May to August 2021were performed. Studies including patients diagnosed with rectal neoplasia or benign polyps who underwent robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery were included. All studies were assessed for risk of bias through assessment tools. Main outcome measures were feasibility, excision quality, and complications. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with a total of 322 local excisions were included. The studies included were all retrospective, primarily case-reports, -series, and cohort studies. The median distance from the anal verge ranged from 3.5 to 10 cm and the median size was between 2.5 and 5.3 cm. Overall, 4.6% of the resections had a positive resection margin. The overall complication rate was at 9.5% with severe complications (Clavien-Dindo score III) at 0.9%. CONCLUSION: Based on limited, retrospective data, with a high risk of bias, robot-assisted transanal minimal invasive surgery seems feasible and safe for local excisions in the rectum.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Retais , Robótica , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Reto/cirurgia , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Canal Anal/cirurgia , Margens de Excisão , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Tech Coloproctol ; 25(11): 1199-1207, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224035

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The EndoLuminal Surgical System (ELS) is an emerging non-linear robotic system specifically designed for transanal surgery that allows for excision of colorectal neoplasia and luminal defect closure. METHODS: An evaluation of ELS was conducted by a single surgeon in a preclinical setting at the EndoSurgical Center of Florida in Orlando, between October 1st, 2020 and December 31st, 2020, using porcine colon as a model. Mock lesions measured 2.5 to 3.5 cm were excised partial-thickness. Specimen quality and excision time was assessed and evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty consecutive robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) operations utilizing the ELS system were successfully performed without fragmentation. The mean and standard deviation procedure time for all 20 cases was 18.41 ± 14.15 min. The latter 10 cases were completed in substantially less time, suggesting that ELS requires at least 10 preclinical cases for a surgeon to become familiar with the technology. A second task, namely suture closure of the partial-thickness defect, was performed in 9 of the 20 cases. Mean time and standard deviation for this task measured 27.89 ± 10.07 min. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: ELS was successful in performing the tasks of partial-thickness disc excision and closure in a preclinical evaluation. Further study is necessary to determine its clinical applicability.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Colorretal , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Reto
4.
Surg Endosc ; 34(7): 3232-3235, 2020 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32394173

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Robotic single-port platforms represent a viable option for advanced surgical procedures. This preclinical study investigated the dual-field, single-port, robot-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME). TECHNIQUE: In a male human cadaver, we employed the novel da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System, sequentially, to realize the transanal and abdominal parts of the taTME procedure. We evaluated the feasibility of the one-team approach. RESULTS: We showed that single-port access for the taTME was technically feasible with the current da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System in both surgical fields. The total console times were 189 min for the juxta-anal purse-string suture placement, partial intersphincteric resection, and bottom-up mesorectal dissection to where it meets the peritoneal reflection and 43 min for the abdominal procedure. A good quality specimen was achieved. The surgeon comfort was high during simulated surgery. The task load was highly acceptable (NASA-TLX global score: 35), even though it was the surgeon's first use of this platform. CONCLUSION: This preclinical study demonstrated that the robotic, single-port taTME was feasible and could be performed with the da Vinci® SP™ Surgical System, beginning at the level of the dentate line. Further simulations are necessary to confirm this promising approach.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Protectomia/métodos , Reto/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Cadáver , Dissecação/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Masculino
5.
Tech Coloproctol ; 22(7): 529-533, 2018 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29987695

RESUMO

Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) (RT) represents a compelling new alternative capable of overcoming the limitations of conventional TAMIS for the local excision of rectal lesions. We describe our RT technique using the dVXi™ (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) which we have used to efficiently and completely excise eight cases of rectal lesions which were not endoscopically resectable. We also include a video vignette of the procedure. With the patient in the prone jackknife position, we insert a GelPOINT™ Path Transanal Access Platform (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, CA, USA) in combination with the dVXi and AirSeal™ insufflation system (Conmed, Niagara. Falls, ON, Canada). Our technique aims to be ergonomically efficient to minimise docking difficulties and to reduce instrument clash in the limited space, whilst maximising the capabilities of the dVXi for RT. At 3-month endoscopic follow-up, no evidence of recurrence was detected in any of the eight patients. RT is safe, feasible and has advantages over conventional laparoscopic TAMIS (LT). Our described technique addresses some of the long-standing challenges of LT and the novel RT. The immediate challenge to its widespread use remains the cost, expertise and availability.


Assuntos
Pólipos Intestinais/cirurgia , Reto/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Pólipos Intestinais/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reto/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Tech Coloproctol ; 21(7): 541-545, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28707106

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Transanal surgery remains both an innovative approach to rectal pathology and a demonstrated technical challenge. Improved technology using a single-port system robotic platform (SPS) offers a promising option for this surgery. METHODS: SPS robotic system was utilized to perform submucosal, full-thickness and cylindrical excision on four cadavers. Operative performance and surgeon fatigue were measured. RESULTS: On all types of resections, the SPS system performed well. There were no piecemeal or fragmented resections. Closure was judged to be good to excellent in all cases. Surgeon assessment of setup and performance of the SPS was excellent in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: SPS robotic transanal surgery represents an exciting new option for transanal surgery.


Assuntos
Reto/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/instrumentação , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/instrumentação , Adulto , Cadáver , Desenho de Equipamento , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal/métodos
7.
Cureus ; 16(3): e55995, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606246

RESUMO

Small cell carcinoma of the rectum (SCCR) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine tumor. Its association with a tubulovillous adenoma is an exceptional occurrence, presenting significant implications for diagnosis and treatment. This case report details a 62-year-old male, undergoing treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma, presented with symptoms of diarrhea. A colonoscopy initially suggested a benign tubulovillous adenoma, but the presence of discordant clinical findings led to further evaluation. The final diagnosis, established post-surgery, was SCCR originating from a tubulovillous adenoma. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges when unusual presentations arise from atypical pathological findings, especially in patients with concurrent malignancies. The management followed standard care protocols, including robotic transanal surgery, despite the patient's ongoing HCC treatment. This case adds to the limited existing literature on SCCR, particularly its rare association with a tubulovillous adenoma. It emphasizes the importance of a multi-disciplinary approach in diagnosing and managing rare entities in colorectal cancer while demonstrating the feasibility of standard care in patients with complex comorbidities.

8.
Am Surg ; 89(7): 3301-3302, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36853905

RESUMO

Many transanal platforms have recently evolved to manage rectal pathologies. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) have been developed to address the limitations of conventional transanal surgery. More recently, the addition of the robotic platform to the surgeon's armamentarium has made it possible to combine the dexterity of the robotic surgical system with the standard TAMIS single-port platform to treat complex rectal lesions. In this article, we present the case of a patient who underwent rTAMIS for the management of a large endoscopically unresectable rectal mass.


Assuntos
Adenoma , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais , Neoplasias Retais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Cirurgia Endoscópica Transanal , Humanos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Adenoma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Canal Anal
9.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 61: 86-90, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31352319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer treatment is still a challenging frontier in general surgery, as there is no general agreement on which surgical approach is best for its management. Total mesorectal excision (TME), influenced the practical approach to rectal cancer, and brought a significant improvement on tumor recurrence and patients survival. Robotic transanal surgery is a newer approach to rectal dissection whose purpose is to overcome the limits of the traditional transabdominal approach, improving accuracy of distal dissection and preservation of hypogastric innervation. An increasing interest on this new technique has raised, thanks to the excellent pathological and acceptable short-term clinical outcomes reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three consecutive cases of robotic transanal TME were prospectically performed between May 2017 and October 2017. RESULTS: TME quality was Quirke 3 grade in all cases. Mean operative time was 530 min. None of the patients had intra-operatively or post-operatively complications. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic transanal TME is a very recent procedure. Acclaimed greatest advantage of robotic transanal TME is the facilitation of dissection with an in-line view, which translates in an improved surgical field exposure and visualization. Further investigations are needed to assure the actual value of robotic transanal approach.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA