Staged urethroplasty with groin full-thickness skin graft for managing complex anterior urethral strictures: surgical outcomes and predictive factors.

PURPOSE: To describe outcomes of staged-urethroplasty in complex anterior urethral strictures using full-thickness-skin-graft (FTSG) harvested from the hairless groin area, and to identify factors influencing successful outcomes. METHODS: Through retrospective chart review, we identified a total of 67 men who underwent the first-stage operation (grafting) using groin-FTSG for staged-urethroplasty to treat complex anterior urethral strictures unsuitable for one-stage urethroplasty. Among these, 59 underwent the second-stage operation (tubularization) at a median duration of 5.1-months after grafting. Patients were assessed for outcomes as scheduled after tubularization outcomes were analyzed only for 48 patients for whom ≥ 1-year follow-up data after tubularization were available. Their mean follow-up duration was 27.1 months. Success was defined as achieving physiologic voiding without requiring further procedures. RESULTS: Median stricture-length was 5.5 cm in all 67 patients. After grafting, neourethral-opening-narrowing occurred in 18. Partial graft-loss occurred in 8, of whom only 3 underwent re-grafting. The percentage of patients who achieved successful outcomes was 81.3%. Improvements in maximum-urine-flow-rate and post-void-residual-urine-volume were maintained until the last follow-up visit. A urethrocutaneous-fistula occurred in one patient, while meatal-stenosis occurred in two. On multivariate-regression-analysis, the presence of neourethral-opening-narrowing was the only predictor of non-success after tubularization. Furthermore, the presence of hypertension, longer stricture-length, and a history of prior direct-vision-internal-urethrotomy were predictors of the occurrence of neourethral-opening-narrowing. CONCLUSION: Staged-urethroplasty using groin-FTSG is well worth considering as a useful therapeutic option for complex anterior urethral strictures, with an acceptable success rate and low morbidity. The absence of neourethral-opening-narrowing after the first-stage operation leads to success.

Technical Aspects and Outcome of Multi-Staged and Single-Staged Thoracoabdominal Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Repair.

PURPOSE: In some cases of endovascular thoracoabdominal or juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair, a thoracic endograft in combination with a fenestrated renovisceral device may be needed in order to create a sufficient proximal landing zone. This study aimed to evaluate the technical aspects and postoperative morbidity of a single- or 2-stage approach. METHODS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in combination with elective fenestrated repair (fenestrated endovascular aortic repair [FEVAR]; fenestrated Anaconda device) from 2015 to 2022 were included in this retrospective bicentric study. Underlying pathologies, aortic morphology, technical details, and postoperative morbidity were recorded. RESULTS: Single-staged ("1S," n=61) and 2-staged ("2S," n=26) interventions were compared. Indications were thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAAs) (Crawford I-IV) (n=56, 64%) and juxtarenal aneurysms (n=31, 36%). In 2S, the proportion of TAAA was higher than in 1S (2S: 77%, 1S: 59%; p=0.001). In 2S, the covered length of the descending aorta was longer (1S: 128±60 mm, 2S: 202±64 mm; p=0.003). Temporary aneurysm sack perfusion (TASP) was established in 11 (18%) of 1S and 1 (4%) of 2S patients (p=0.079), as well as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage catheter in 48 (79%) of 1S and 19 (73%) of 2S. The rate of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) and the severity of SCI were not different in both groups, with a total of 3 cases of persisting paraplegia. The rate of access complications was higher in 2S (n=6, 23%) than in 1S (n=4, 7%; p=0.027). Postoperative 30 day morbidity did not significantly differ in both groups and neither did 30 day mortality (4.6% in 1S vs 3.8% in 2S; p=0.083). CONCLUSION: The combination of TEVAR and FEVAR using a fenestrated endograft is feasible and safe. Aortic morphology does not change significantly after endovascular repair. A single-staged strategy is feasible with excellent results, especially in Crawford IV, Crawford V, or juxtarenal aneurysms. Two-staged repair is recommended in cases with long aortic coverage and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Follow-up data are needed to evaluate the long-term stability of the TEVAR/FEVAR interconnection. CLINICAL IMPACT: Our study has revealed the safety and efficacy of the combination of TEVAR and FEVAR in the treatment of TAAAs and juxtarenal aneurysms with compromised supravisceral landing zones. A single-staged concept is not necessary in all cases. Staged procedures may reduce postoperative morbidity in cases with long aortic coverage and higher ASA class.

Effects of staged rehabilitation training on inflammatory factor levels and red blood cell distribution width followingcardiac valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The current study was conducted aimed atexploring the effects of staged rehabilitation training on the levels of inflammatory factors and red blood cell distribution in patients who underwent cardiac valve replacement. METHODS: A total of 140 patients who underwent cardiac valve replacement at The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University between April 2021 and November 2022 were included in this study. During the postoperative rehabilitation phase, the patients were randomly assigned to either the control group or the experimental group. The experimental group received staged rehabilitation training (n = 70), while the control group received conventional care and rehabilitation suggestions without specialized staged rehabilitation training (n = 70). Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to theirinclusion in the study. Clinical data of the patients were collected andanalyzed. RDW was measured using an automated blood cell analyzer on postoperative day 1, 14, and 28. Levels ofTNF-α, IL-6 and CRP were measured using ELISA. Quality of life was evaluated usingthe WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. The effects of postoperative rehabilitation were assessed using the 6MWD test. The occurrence of adverse events in the postoperative periodwas alsoanalyzed. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the general characteristics of the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). On the first day after surgery, no significant differences were seen in RDW between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, on the 14th and 28th day after surgery, the experimental group exhibited a significant reduction in RDW compared to the control group (P < 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the levels of serum TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, on the 14th and the 28th after surgery, the experimental group showed evidently lower levels of TNF-α, IL-6 and CRP compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The experimental group demonstrated higher scores in the domains of physical health, psychological state, social relationships, and environment in the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the experimental group exhibited increased average,minimum,maximum walking distances in the6-minute walking test compared to the control group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative adverse events between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Staged rehabilitation training exerteda positive effect on the levels of inflammatory factors and red blood cell distribution in patients following cardiac valve replacement. This type of rehabilitation training facilitated the patient's recovery process by reducing the inflammatory response and improving the condition of red blood cells. Additionally, it enhanced the quality of life and rehabilitation outcomes for patients.

Staged versus non-staged elective hybrid iliofemoral revascularization - analysis of ten years of prospective data.

INTRODUCTION: Reports of large series of hybrid iliofemoral revascularization for chronic lower limb ischemia are scarce. The aims of this study were to evaluate outcomes for staged and non-staged procedures, and to evaluate risk factors for outcomes at 90 days. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were consecutively included between 2013 and 2023. Surgical site infection (SSI) was defined by the ASEPSIS criteria and major adverse limb events (MALE) as onset of acute or continuing or worsening chronic limb ischemia or major amputation. Factors associated with outcomes were tested in a multivariable logistic regression analysis and expressed in Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Patients undergoing non-staged procedures (n=124) had higher TASC (Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus) class representing anatomical occlusive complexity, more often through-and through femoral guidewire access, more endoprosthesis, more covered stents, longer procedure time with open groin wounds, and less contralateral femoral access, than those undergoing staged procedures (n=31). The median time interval between the staged procedures was one day, and iliac stenting was done first in 77%. The median in-hospital stay was non-significantly longer in staged procedure (8 versus 6 days, p=0.053). The overall SSI and MALE rates were 25.8% and 20.0%, respectively, without differences between groups. Diabetes mellitus (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 7.2]) and presence of a foot ulcer (OR 3.7, 95% CI [1.5 - 9.4]) were independently associated with MALE at 90 days. Postoperative hyperglycemia was non-significantly associated with SSI (OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.0 - 4.5], p=0.066) in multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The risks of SSI and MALE after elective hybrid iliofemoral revascularization were high. There appears to be no benefit in performing staged as opposed to non-staged procedures. The extent of iliofemoral occlusive disease according to the TASC classification had little influence on outcomes whereas diabetes mellitus and presence of a foot ulcer had greater impact on MALE.

Role of liver augmentation prior to hepatic resection - a survey on standards, procedures, and indications in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria.

PURPOSE: For primary and secondary liver tumors oncological resection remains a chance of cure. Augmentation of functional liver tissue may be necessary to preserve sufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Clinical decision-making on liver augmentation techniques and indications may differ internationally. Thus, this study aims to identify standards of liver augmentation in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. METHODS: Using a web-based survey, 48 hospitals in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria were invited to report their surgical indication, standard procedures, and results of liver augmentation. RESULTS: Forty (83.3%) of the hospitals invited participated. Most of the hospitals were certified liver centers (55%), performing complex surgeries such as liver transplantation (57.5%) and ALPPS (80%). The standard liver augmentation technique in all countries was portal vein embolization (PVE; 56%), followed by ALPPS (32.1%) in Germany or PVE with hepatic vein embolization (33.3%) in Switzerland and Austria. Standard procedure for liver augmentation did not correlate with certification as liver center, performance of liver transplantation or ALPPS. Surgical indication for PVE varied depending on tumor entity. Most hospitals rated the importance of PVE before resection of cholangiocarcinoma or colorectal metastases as high, while PVE for hepatocellular carcinoma was rated as low. CONCLUSION: The survey gives an overview of the clinical routine in HPB centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. PVE seems to dominate as standard technique to increase the FLR. However, there is a variety in the main indication for liver augmentation. Further studies are necessary evaluating the differing PVE techniques for liver augmentation.

Endocardial Fibroelastosis Resection: When it Works and When it Does Not.

Endocardial fibroelastosis (EFE) is a thickening of the endocardial layer by accumulation of collagen and elastic fibers. Endothelial to mesenchymal transformation is proposed to be the underlying mechanism of formation. Although EFE can occur in both right and left ventricles, this article will focus on management of left ventricular EFE. Through its fibrous, nonelastic manifestation EFE restricts the myocardium leading to diastolic and systolic ventricular dysfunction and prevents ventricular growth in neonates and infants. The presence of EFE may be a marker for underlying myocardial fibrosis as well. The extent of EFE within the left ventricular cavity can be variable ranging from patchy to confluent distribution. Similarly the depth of penetration and degree of infiltration into myocardium can be variable. The management of EFE is controversial, although resection of EFE has been reported as part of the staged ventricular recruitment therapy. Following resection, EFE recurs and infiltrates the myocardium after primary resection. Herein we review the current experience with EFE resection.

Outcomes of 2-SSRS plus bevacizumab therapy strategy for brainstem metastases (BSM) over 2 cm3: a multi-center study.

Despite 2-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (2-SSRS) has been reported to provide patients with improved survival and limited toxicity, 2-SSRS for brainstem metastases (BSM) larger than 2 cm3 remains challenging. We tried to find out the effectiveness and safety of 2-SSRS plus bevacizumab therapy for BSMs over 2 cm3 and prognostic factors that related to the tumor local control. Patients that received 2-SSRS plus bevacizumab therapy from four gamma knife center were retrospectively studied from Jan 2014 to December 2023. Patients' domestic characteristics and the tumor features were evaluated before and after the treatment. Cox regression model was used to find out prognostic factors for tumor local control. 53 patients with 63 lesions received the therapy. The median peri-tumor edema volume greatly reduced at the end of therapy (P < 0.01), the median tumor volume dramatically reduced (P < 0.01) and patients' KPS score improved significantly (P < 0.05) 3 months after the therapy. Patients' median OS was 12.8 months. The tumor local control rate at 3, 6, and 12 months was 98.4%, 93.4%, and 85.2%. The incidence side effects were mainly oral and nasal hemorrhage (5.7%, 3/53), and radiation necrosis (13.2%, 7/53). Patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma, therapeutic dose over 12 Gy at second-stage SRS, primary peri-tumor edema volume less than 2.3 cm³, primary tumor volume less than 3.7 cm³ would enjoy longer tumor local control. These results suggested that 2-SSRS plus bevacizumab therapy was effective and safe for BSMs over 2 cm3. However, it is important for patients with BSM to receive early diagnosis and treatment to achieve good tumor local control.

Is two-staged gamma knife surgery a reasonable management option for very large cerebellar metastases? A case series of three patients.

OBJECTIVE: Two-staged gamma knife surgery (GKS) is a method that may extend the upper tumor volume limit for using GKS in the management of brain metastases. However, the safety of treating very large posterior fossa lesions with this technique has not been well demonstrated. Therefore, we analyzed our experience in treating cerebellar metastases larger than 12 cm3 with two-staged GKS. METHODS: Four consecutive patients harboring 12 to 30 cm3 cerebellar metastases scheduled two-staged GKS were included in the study, and all but one patient completed the treatment. The treatment doses were 10-13 Gy. All patients were followed with regular MR imaging and clinical assessments, and the tumor volumes were measured on all treatment and follow-up images. RESULTS: Tumor progression was not demonstrated in any of the patients. Tumor volumes decreased by, on average, more than half between the two stages. The median survival was 22 months, and no patient died due to intracranial tumor progression. Peritumoral edema at the first GKS resolved in all patients, replaced by asymptomatic mild T2 changes in two of them not requiring any treatment. No radiation-induced complication has developed thus far. CONCLUSION: Staged GKS seems to be a feasible management option for very large cerebellar metastases.

Long-Term Outcome of Time-Staged Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Large Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for large (> 10 mL) arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remains highly challenging. This study evaluated long-term effect of time-staged gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) for large AVMs. METHODS: For patients with large AVMs treated by time-staged GKS over 10 years, time-staged GKS was repeated every three years targeting the entire nidus if total obliteration was not achieved. Obliteration rate and post-GKS complications were assessed based on 10 mL volume interval of AVMs. Prognostic factors for these outcomes were evaluated using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients were analyzed. For AVMs in the 10-20 mL subgroup, a dose ≥ 13.5Gy yielded higher obliteration rate in the first GKS. In the 20-30 mL subgroup, a second GKS significantly boosted obliteration. AVMs > 30 mL did not achieve any obliteration with the first GKS. Among 35 (36.4%) cases lost to follow-up, 7 (7.2%) were lost due to GKS complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that each subgroup needed different time for achieving 50% favorable obliteration outcome rate: 3.5, 6.5, and 8.2 years for 10-20 mL, 20-30 mL, and > 30 mL subgroup, respectively. Total obliteration rate calculated by intention-to-treat method: 73%, 51.7%, 35.7%, respectively, 61.5% overall. Post-GKS hemorrhage and chronic encapsulated expanding hematoma (CEEH) occurred in 13.5% and 8.3% of cases, respectively. Two patients died. Dose and volume were significant prognostic factors for obliteration. Initial AVM volume was a significant prognostic factor of post-GKS hemorrhage and CEEH. CONCLUSION: Time-staged GKS for large AVMs less than 30 mL has highly favorable long-term outcome and a tolerable complication rate.

The interval between staged bilateral total knee arthroplasties does not affect early complications of the second knee or long-term function of the first and second knees.

BACKGROUND: This study explored the optimal time interval between staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA) to minimize early complications of the second TKA and maximise the long-term function of the first and second knees. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 266 patients who underwent staged BTKA between 2013 and 2018. Groups 1-4 had time intervals between BTKAs of 1-6, 6-12, 12-18, and 18-24 months, respectively. Demographics, postoperative complications within 90 days of the second TKA, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score were compared among the groups. RESULTS: In total, 54, 96, 75, and 41 patients were assigned to groups 1-4, respectively. Although group 1 had the highest overall complication rate (11.11%), there was no significant difference in the complication rate among the four groups. Also, no significant differences were found among the four groups in functional and patient-reported outcomes, in either the first or second knee at 5 years postoperatively, including KSS-knee, KSS-function, WOMAC-pain, WOMAC-stiffness, and WOMAC-physical function. The interval between BTKA did not influence complications or the function of the second knee. The TKA type (posterior-stabilised vs. medial-pivot) and age did not correlate significantly with any scores. CONCLUSIONS: There was no group difference in early complications of the second TKA, and postoperative function was equivalent between the two knees and did not vary by the interval between surgeries. The results of this study give surgeons and patients more choices. If patients cannot tolerate severe symptoms in the contralateral knee after the first TKA, the second TKA should be performed as early as possible. If knee joint function is not well recovered after the first TKA, and patients are anxious to undergo the second TKA, surgeons can advise patients to postpone the operation based on these results.

Staged Approach to Tibial Nail Removal Poses Increased Risk for Infection in the Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While previous research has addressed conversion arthroplasty scenarios, there is limited data on outcomes of staged or concurrent removal of intramedullary (IM) nails during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aimed to explore the association between the timing of IM nail removal and the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), surgical site infection (SSI), manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), and aseptic revision at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years after TKA when IM nail removal is performed in either a (1) staged or (2) concurrent manner. METHODS: We queried a national, all-payer database of all patients who underwent a primary TKA and hardware removal of an IM tibial nail. The group was separated into mutually exclusive cohorts with removal performed either (1) in a staged manner (n = 287) or (2) on the same day of TKA (n = 2,958). Surgical complications included the following: PJIs, SSIs, MUAs, and aseptic revisions. Surgical complications were collected at 90-day, 1 year, and 2-year time points. RESULTS: Patients who had staged nail removal before TKA demonstrated the highest incidence of PJI at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years (13.9, 16.7, and 17.1%, respectively). Adjusted multivariate regression analyses demonstrated significantly higher odds of a PJI, SSI, and MUA at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years for all patients who had staged nail removal TKA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There was an observed association between concurrent IM nail removal and a decreased risk of PJI, SSI, and MUA when compared to patients who had nail removal in a staged fashion. However, this does not discount the utility of the staged approach, as it may be necessary for patients less tolerant to longer operative times.

Simultaneous Versus Staged Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis of Revenue and Contribution Margin.

BACKGROUND: Though previous studies have demonstrated improved cost benefits associated with simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty (simBTHA and staBTHA), further investigation is needed regarding the revenues and contribution margins (CMs) of these procedures. In this study, we compared revenue, CM, and surgical outcomes between simBTHA and staBTHA. METHODS: All patients who underwent simBTHA (both procedures completed the same day) and staBTHA (procedures completed on different days within one year) between 2011 and 2021 at a single high-volume orthopedic specialty hospital were identified. Of the 1,517 identified patients (n = 139 simBTHA, n = 1,378 staBTHA), 232 were included in a 1:1 propensity match based on baseline demographics (116 per cohort). Revenue, costs, CM, and surgical outcomes were compared between cohorts. RESULTS: Compared to staBTHA, simBTHA procedures had significantly lower total costs (P < .001), direct costs (P < .001), and patient revenue. There was no significant difference in CM between groups (P = .361). Additionally, there were no significant differences in length of stay (P = .173), operative time (P = .438), 90-day readmissions (P = .701), 90-day revisions (P = .313), or all-cause revisions (P = .701) between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Though simBTHA procedures have lower revenues than staBTHA, they also have lower costs, resulting in similar CM between procedures. As both procedures have similar postoperative complication rates, further research is required to evaluate specifically which patients may benefit from simBTHA versus staBTHA regarding clinical and patient-reported outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Opioid Consumption and Mobilization in Staged Bilateral Total Joint Arthroplasty: Did We Learn Our Lesson the First Time?

BACKGROUND: In patients who require bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA), staged procedures are a reasonable option for treatment of bilateral osteoarthritis. We sought to determine whether perioperative outcomes differed between first and second total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: This was a retrospective review of all patients who underwent staged, bilateral THA or TKA between January 30, 2017, and April 8, 2021. All patients who were included underwent their second procedure within 1 year of the first. Patients were separated based on whether both their procedures took place before or subsequently after an institution-wide opioid-sparing protocol that was implemented on October 1, 2018. A total of 961 patients who underwent 1,922 procedures met the inclusion criteria for this study. For THA, 388 unique patients comprised 776 procedures, while 573 unique patients comprised 1,146 TKAs. Opioid prescriptions were prospectively documented on nursing opioid administration flowsheets and converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) for comparison. Activity measure scores for postacute care (AM-PAC) were used as a measurement of physical therapy progression. RESULTS: Hospital stays, home discharges, perioperative opioid usages, pain scores, and AM-PAC scores were not significantly different for the second THA or TKA compared to first procedure, regardless of timing in relation to the opioid-sparing protocol. CONCLUSION: Patients experienced similar outcomes following their first versus their second TJA. Limited opioid prescriptions following TJA do not negatively impact pain and functional outcomes. These protocols can safely be instituted to help mitigate the opioid epidemic. LEVEL III EVIDENCE: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Nearly 14-Fold Increased Risk of Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty When Previous Contralateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Required Manipulation Under Anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Stiffness remains a common complication after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the gold standard treatment for early postoperative stiffness; however, there remains a paucity of data on the risk of MUA after primary TKA if a prior contralateral TKA required MUA. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 3,102 patients who had staged primary TKAs between 2016 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 33 (range, 18 to 59) and the mean age was 67 years (range, 24 to 91). The mean preoperative range of motion for the first TKA was 2 to 104°, and for the contralateral TKA was 1 to 107°. The primary outcomes were MUA following first and second primary TKAs. Multivariable Poisson regressions were used to evaluate associations between risk factors and outcomes. RESULTS: The rate of MUA after the first TKA was 2.6% (n = 83 of 3,102) and 1.3% (n = 40 of 3,102) after the contralateral TKA. After adjustment, there was a nearly 14-fold higher rate of MUA after the second TKA if the patient had an MUA after the first TKA (relative risk, 13.80; 95% CI [confidence interval], 7.14 to 26.66). For the first TKA, increasing age (adjusted risk ratio [ARR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.83) and increasing body mass index (ARR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.90) were associated with lower risk for MUA. For the second TKA, increasing age was associated with a lower risk of MUA (ARR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.80). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing staged bilateral TKA, patients who undergo MUA following the first primary TKA are nearly 14-fold more likely to undergo an MUA following the contralateral primary TKA than those who did not have an MUA after their first TKA.

To Stage or Not to Stage? Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes, Complications, and Discharge Disposition After Staged and Simultaneous Bilateral Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patients who have bilateral hip arthritis can be treated with bilateral total hip arthroplasty (bTHA) in either a staged or simultaneous fashion. The goal of this study was to determine whether staged and simultaneous posterior bTHA patients differ in regard to (1) patient-reported outcome measures, (2) 90-day complication rates, and (3) discharge dispositions and cumulative lengths of stay. METHODS: Patients who (1) underwent simultaneous bTHA or staged bTHA (within 12 months) using the posterior approach, and (2) completed preoperative and 1-year postoperative Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement surveys were included in the study. A total of 266 patients (87 simultaneous bTHA and 179 staged bTHA) were included. Chart review was performed to collect patient-level variables, postoperative complications, discharge dispositions, and lengths of stay. RESULTS: Staged bTHA patients had higher Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical component scores compared to simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery (P = .019, .006, and .008, respectively), but these differences did not meet the minimal clinically important difference threshold for any questionnaire. Simultaneous bTHA was associated with higher rate of periprosthetic fractures (P = .034) and discharge to a location other than home (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There were statistically significant, but likely not clinically meaningful differences in patient-reported outcomes for staged and simultaneous bTHA patients at 6 weeks after surgery. Surgeons should be aware of the higher periprosthetic fracture risk and greater likelihood of discharge to a rehabilitation facility associated with simultaneous bTHA. Further research should aim to understand which patients may benefit most from simultaneous bTHA.

Staged Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: Differing Results Comparing the First and Second Knees.

BACKGROUND: Patients often prefer one knee over the other following staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). Our study compared patient-reported outcomes scores of each knee following BTKA and identified factors that may contribute to the identified discrepancies. METHODS: All patients who underwent staged BTKA between July 2014 and August 2022 were identified. The patient-reported outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Each knee's results were compared using paired t-tests and McNemar tests. Preoperative Kellgren-Lawrence Grade (KLG), postoperative range of motion (ROM), reoperation rates, and manipulations under anesthesia (MUAs) were collected. Results were stratified based on time between TKAs (< 3 months, 3 to 12 months, 1 to 2 years, and > 2 years). RESULTS: There were 911 patients who underwent staged BTKA, with a mean 4.1-year follow-up. The ROM, patient satisfaction, MUAs, and reoperations were not significantly different between knees. Comparing the KLG of the first and second knees, 71% had the same KLG for both knees, 21% had a lower KLG, and 7% of the second knees had a higher KLG. The first knee had greater pain reduction (-10.6 at 2 weeks, -27.4 at 6 weeks) compared to the second (9.3 at 2 weeks, -8.1 at 6 weeks) (P < .0001) and better improvement in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) score (8.5 at 2 weeks, 16.9 at 6 weeks) compared to the second (-5.8 at 2 weeks, 5.0 at 6 weeks) (P < .0001). The 1-year outcomes between first and second knees, or recovery curves, were not different when stratifying by time between TKAs. CONCLUSIONS: The second knee in a staged BTKA has less delta improvement in KOOS JR and pain scores at early follow-up, likely due to higher starting KOOS JR and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores, despite similar final patient satisfaction and clinical outcome measures. Lower KLG in the second total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may contribute to these findings. An MUA after the first TKA is highly predictive of an MUA after the second TKA.

Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty: Outcomes of Staged Versus Simultaneous Procedures Performed Using an Anterior-Based Muscle-Sparing Approach.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the United States continues to increase due to its ability to markedly improve patients' quality of life. This study investigated and compared the perioperative and postoperative outcomes of simultaneous (SI-THA) and staged (ST-THA) bilateral THA procedures using an anterior-based muscle-sparing (ABMS) approach. METHODS: This retrospective case control study evaluated perioperative and postoperative outcomes from primary bilateral SI-THA or ST-THA (within 365 days) performed with the ABMS approach by 3 surgeons at a single institution between January 2013 and August 2020. A total of 226 patients (113 in each cohort) were matched based on age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidity score. RESULTS: Compared to the ST-THA group, the SI-THA had shorter anesthesia duration (P < .001) and shorter length of stay (P < .001), but longer length of surgery (P = .002). There was no statistical significance between groups in blood transfusion rates, discharge dispositions, emergency department visits, hospital readmissions, or postoperative complications within one year. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that SI-THA and ST-THA yield comparable results using the ABMS approach. Our perioperative and postoperative results suggest low rates of complications, emergency department visits, readmissions, and high rates of patient satisfaction scores. Therefore, both SI-THA and ST-THA can be considered by experienced surgeons as treatment for advanced bilateral hip arthritis.

Innovative Hip Distraction Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia or Similar High-Riding Patients.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) for dislocated hips (Crowe IV dysplasia) presents unique challenges. Conventional approaches involve subtrochanteric osteotomies, but are complex with additional fixation and potentially lead to limb length discrepancies, nerve palsies, and other complications. An alternative strategy is a staged approach, where the femoral head (or remnant) is gradually lowered (distraction technique) to align with the true acetabulum over a period of time, followed by a second-stage anatomically acetabular-positioned THA. External fixation distraction and telescoping internal lengthening devices have been utilized to achieve preoperative alignment. We evaluated these techniques, including the types, time, and amount of distraction needed, as well as outcomes and complication rates. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 14 patients (9 women, 5 men), who had a mean age of 32 years (range, 16 to 67), underwent staged surgical interventions using hip distraction using external fixators or internal lengthening devices for hip dysplasia and other pathologies (Perthes disease, osteonecrosis) in preparation for a second-stage anatomically placed THA. The mean follow-up duration for external-fixation patients was 10 years (range, 6.5 to 13.4). RESULTS: Staged treatment involved external fixators (n = 8) or internal lengthening devices (n = 6) with a device placement mean of 48 days (range, 42 to 71). The amount of distraction ranged from 6 to 12 cm. There were 2 patients who required uncomplicated revision of the internal lengthening devices, and another patient had a temporary peroneal nerve palsy. There was 1 patient who underwent an acetabular revision at 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: We focused on a challenging patient cohort that emphasizes the efficacy of staged interventions in managing Crowe Type IV dysplasia and similar cases. Favorable outcomes were found with the immediate transition to THA after device removal that effectively addressed soft-tissue contractures and femoral migration. Despite the need for further validation via larger, prospective studies, this innovative approach may pave the way toward optimizing this strategy for these difficult hip pathologies.

Effects of staged multiple phytohormones application on capillary-driven attached Chlorella sp. biofilm.

Comparing with single phytohormone application, applying multiple phytohormones to microalgae-based wastewater treatment systems can offer more extensive growth-promoting and stress-protecting effects for microalgae, yet the advantage of stress-relieving salicylic acid (SA) under combined phytohormones application scenario has not been exploited. Employing the improved capillary-driven attached microalgae culturing device (CD-PBR) previously used for single phytohormone application, this study compared the effects of mixed and single phytohormone(s) addition under as low as 10-7 M dosage. In order to make the best of SA for its stress-relieving property, postponed SA addition combined with applying other phytohormone(s) at the beginning of microalgae cultivation was also investigated. Combination of 10-6 M 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) with 10-7 M SA was sufficient for enhancing growth-promoting effects and anti-oxidative responses for attached Chlorella sp., while indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) addition was unnecessary. Combination of 6-BA addition at the beginning while postponed SA addition on Day 4 could further sustain such beneficial effects, while removing up to 99.7% total nitrogen (TN) and 97.9% total phosphorus (TP) from the bulk liquid. These results provided innovative strategies on mixed phytohormones addition for microalgae.

Staged vs concurrent hardware removal in total ankle arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Ankle osteoarthritis is more commonly posttraumatic. Consequently, dealing with hardware removal is quite frequent when performing a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes regarding either a staged or concurrent hardware removal when performing TAA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 275 consecutive patients with TAA previously treated with internal fixation were retrospectively reviewed. Finally, 57 patients were enrolled based on exclusion criteria, and were differentiated into two groups considering the timing of hardware removal (staged-group A vs concurrent-group B) to compare: neurovascular and wound complications, time to recover full weight bearing, scar-tissue esthetic, and surgical time. Moreover, a subgroup comparison considering the surgical approach (single approach, minor additional approach, major additional approach) was performed between the group A and group B. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference other that longer surgical time (p < 0.05) was observed between group A and group B. When considering surgical approach subgroups, statistically significant higher surgical wound complications and revision rate were reported in group B (concurrent) major additional approach subgroup, and a statistically significant shorter time to full weight bearing was reported in group A (staged) major additional approach subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: When performing TAA requiring hardware removal, no clear superiority of staged over concurrent hardware removal was observed. However, when considering a subgroup of patients requiring a separate major incision, a staged approach has shown reduced surgical time, less risk of wound complications, and shorter recovery to full weight bearing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.