Aortic valve neocuspidization and its technical nuance.

Aortic valve neocuspidization or Ozaki procedure represents an advanced surgical strategy for the management of patients with aortic valvulopathy. It has been shown to have clinical and hemodynamic outcomes that compare favorably with aortic valve replacement as it restores physiological aortic valve function and left ventricular remodeling. There are, however, a new set of issues including structural valve deterioration, leaflet tear/perforation, and need for reoperation. A keen understanding of the technical nuances involved with the Ozaki procedure may help in reducing the incidence of such adverse outcomes.

Institution representation in publications reporting mitral valve repair durability: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair durability currently plays a key role in operative decision making and in defining optimal surgical practice. However, mitral valve durability outcomes measures are not captured by national registries and limited to centers that publish their outcomes. In this study, we aim to describe the scope of institutions represented by reports describing durability outcomes after mitral valve repair within the contemporary literature. METHODS AND RESULTS: A scoping review of the literature was performed to extract abstracts potentially reporting mitral valve operation outcomes published between 2000-2019. 370 full text articles reporting mitral valve durability outcomes by either reoperation rate or rate of recurrent mitral regurgitation met criteria for analysis. Study characteristics including case volume, country and institution of origin, and surgeon volume were extracted and used to calculate the proportion of total cases in the top 3, 5, and 10 represented countries and institutions by the sum of reported mitral valve repairs described. The top 5 of 21 countries represented 78.9% of the mitral valve repair cases described. The top 3 most represented institutions described 20,120 (37.3%) of all mitral valve repairs in 58 (33.9%) single-center studies. CONCLUSION: Published mitral valve repair durability data must be interpreted with caution when used to derive policies and practice recommendations that govern the cardiovascular community at large.

A successful double valve repair on an interesting background: Case report.

Aortic regurgitation in a bicuspid aortic valve is a complex entity that involves not only the semilunar valve but also the structure of the aortic root which is functionally and pathologically in a very close relationship to it. Considering repairing a bicuspid valve mandates a mindful involvement of all related structures concurrently. Here, we report an interesting case of both bicuspid aortic valve and mitral valve regurgitation in a patient with a history of infective endocarditis, that was successfully managed by double valve repair.

Outcomes of aortic root enlargement during isolated aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: Aortic root enlargement (ARE) lowers the risk of patient prosthesis mismatch after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with small annular size. Whether ARE is associated with increased operative mortality is controversial. This study compares the early and intermediate outcomes in patients undergoing SAVR with and without ARE. METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated SAVR with and without ARE from 2015 to 2020 were analyzed. Propensity-matching was used to adjust for possible confounding variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to estimate and compare overall outcomes and survival in the study cohorts. RESULTS: Among 868 isolated SAVRs, ARE was performed in 54 (6.2%) patients. Before matching, mean age was similar but female sex (67.4% vs. 29.6%; SD: -0.82) and previous AVR (18.9% vs. 3.9%; SD: -0.48) were more common in patients undergoing SAVR + ARE versus SAVR alone. A bovine pericardial patch was used for 81.5% (44 of 54) of ARE, with a Dacron patch in the rest. After propensity matching, the average cardiopulmonary bypass (138.2 ± 34.9 vs. 102.9 ± 33.0 min; p < 0.01) and cross-clamp times (113.8 ± 26.7 vs. 83.0 ± 28.4 min; p < 0.01) were longer in the SAVR + ARE group. There were no significant differences in postoperative stroke, new-onset dialysis, pacemaker placement, reoperation for bleeding, length of hospital stay, or 30-day readmission. Thirty-day mortality (0% vs. 0.6%, p = 1.0) and 5-year survival (96.3% vs. 95.7%, p = 0.86) were also similar. CONCLUSIONS: ARE during surgical AVR can be safely performed without an increase in complications with excellent early and intermediate-term survival.

Aortic valve neocuspidization: Frequently asked technical questions.

Since the first description by Professor Ozaki in 2011, more than 5500 aortic valve neocuspidization procedures have been performed worldwide, with promising short- and mid-term outcomes. We here report the nuances required to master this highly reproducible, standardized technique for the treatment of aortic valve disease.

Combined aortic and mitral valvular surgery with the Intuity rapid deployment prosthesis in the aortic position: Operative tips and tricks.

The Edwards Intuity valve is a rapid deployment prosthesis designed for the aortic position. There is a paucity of literature on the use of the Intuity valve in combined aortic and mitral double valvular surgery. We present a case that highlights our novel surgical technique for implanting the Intuity valve in the aortic position following insertion of a conventional sutured bioprosthetic valve in the mitral position.

Effectiveness of telemedicine in a mitral valve center of excellence.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a drastic increase in the use of telemedicine. There is little information about the effectiveness of telemedicine in cardiac surgery. We examined clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction among patients who had in-person versus telemedicine preoperative appointments in a subspecialized mitral valve surgical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who had elective mitral valve operations between January 2019 and February 2021. Patients were categorized into 2 groups based on the format of the preoperative appointment (telemedicine or in-person). Preoperative characteristics and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. All patients who had a telemedicine appointment were sent an online survey to assess their satisfaction with the process. RESULTS: Among 286 patients analyzed, 197 (69%) had in-person preoperative evaluations and 89 (31%) had telemedicine evaluations. The in-person and telemedicine groups had similar preoperative and operative characteristics. Outcomes did not differ between the 2 groups, including ventilation time (3.7 vs. 4.1 h, p = .399), total length of stay (5 vs. 5 days, p = .949), 30-day mortality (0% vs. 1%, p = .311), and readmissions within 30 days (13% vs. 8%, p = .197). Among patients who completed the survey, 91% were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the telemedicine preoperative appointment. CONCLUSION: Patients who had telemedicine preoperative appointments before mitral valve operations during the COVID-19 pandemic had similarly excellent clinical outcomes to patients who had in-person preoperative appointments before the pandemic. Patients had relatively high levels of satisfaction with telemedicine and almost half preferred telemedicine for future visits.

Observed versus predicted mortality after isolated tricuspid valve surgery.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study is to analyse the performances of Clinical Risk Score (CRS) and European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE)-II in isolated tricuspid surgery. METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-three patients (54 ± 16 year; 54% female) were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the true positive fraction of test results and the false-positive fraction for a procedure. RESULTS: Considering the 30-day mortality the area under the curve was 0.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.72) for EuroSCORE II and 0.7 (95% CI 0.56-0.84) for CRS-score. The ratio of expected/observed mortality showed underestimation when considering EuroSCORE-II (min. 0.46-max. 0.6). At multivariate analysis, the CRS score (p = .005) was predictor of late cardiac death. CONCLUSION: We suggest using both scores to obtain a range of expected mortality. CRS to speculate on late survival.

A sutureless valve with sutures.

The use of sutureless valves in infective endocarditis has been previously reported. Singh et al. have reported a single-center successful surgical treated pulmonary endocarditis in two cases with a sutureless bioprosthesis.

Aortic valve biologic protheses: A cohort comparison of premature valve failure.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports suggest an increased rate of early structural valve degeneration (SVD) in the Trifecta bioprosthesis (Abbott Cardiovascular). We sought to compare the intermediate-term outcomes of the Magna (Edwards Life Sciences) and Trifecta valves. METHODS: All surgical aortic valve replacements (SAVRs) with Trifecta or Magna/Magna Ease bioprostheses at an academic medical center were extracted from an institutional database. Patients who survived until after discharge (2011-2019) were included. The primary outcome was valve failure for any reason requiring reintervention or contributing to death, identified by reintervention or review of cause of death. Time to failure was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox Proportional Hazards Modeling. RESULTS: Out of 1444 patients, 521 (36%) underwent Trifecta and 923 (64%) underwent Magna implantation with a median follow-up of 27.6 months. Trifecta patients had larger median valve size (25 vs. 23 mm, p < .001) and lower median gradient (8.0 vs. 10.9 mmHg, p < .001). Trifecta patients had higher 48-month estimated failure rates (20.2 ± 7.6% vs. 2.6 ± 0.7%, p < .0001), with failure rates of 21.4 versus 9.2 failures per 1000 person-years (p < .001). After risk-adjustment, Trifecta patients had a 5.3 times hazard of failure (95% confidence interval: 2.78-12.34, p < .001) compared to Magna patients. Only Trifecta valves failed due to sudden aortic regurgitation, 8 out of 521 (1.5%). CONCLUSION: Despite lower postoperative mean gradients, the Trifecta bioprosthesis may have an increased risk of intermediate-term SVD. Further research is warranted to confirm the potential for sudden valve failure.

Right anterior minithoracotomy for redo aortic valve replacement after coronary artery bypass grafting with bilateral internal thoracic artery: A case report.

A 63-year-old male, with a history of coronary artery bypass grafting using bilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafts, underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Avoiding the graft injury, we selected the right anterior minithoracotomy approach under cardiac arrest with systemic hyperkalemia with remaining bilateral ITA grafts open. Deep hypothermia was induced to obtain more reliable myocardial protection. We believe this strategy can be considered as a therapeutic option in patients requiring AVR but unsuitable for transcatheter AVR.

Robotic vs. minimally invasive mitral valve repair: A 5-year comparison of surgical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MVr) is commonly performed. Data on the outcomes of robotic MVr versus nonrobotic minimally invasive MVr are lacking. We sought to compare the short-term and mid-term outcomes of robotic and nonrobotic MVr. METHODS: We reviewed all patients who underwent robotic MVr (n = 424) or nonrobotic MVr via right mini-thoracotomy (n = 86) at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, from January 2015 to February 2020. Data on baseline and operative characteristics, operative and long-term outcomes were analyzed. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity scores. RESULTS: Sixty-nine matched pairs were included in the study. The median age was 59 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-69) and 75% (n = 103) were male. Baseline characteristics were similar after matching. Robotic and nonrobotic MVr had similar operative characteristics, except that robotic had longer cross-clamp times (57 [48-67] vs. 47 [37-58] min, p < .001) and more P2 resections (83% vs. 68%, p = .05) compared to nonrobotic MVr. There was no difference in operative outcomes between groups. Hospital stay was shorter after robotic MVr (4 [3-4] vs. 4 [4-6] days, p = .003). After a median follow-up of 3.3 years (IQR, 2.1-4.5), there was no mortality in either group, and there was no difference in freedom from mitral valve reoperations between robotic and nonrobotic MVr (5 years: 97.1% vs. 95.7%, p = .63). Follow-up echocardiogram analysis predicted excellent freedom from recurrent moderate-or-severe mitral regurgitation at 3 years after robotic and nonrobotic MVr (90% vs. 92%, p = .18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both short-term and mid-term outcomes of robotic and nonrobotic minimally invasive mitral repair surgery are comparable.

Valve choice for aortic valve replacement in patients between 50 and 70 years of age.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: There is a lack of clarity on whether to choose a mechanical or a bioprosthetic valve for aortic valve replacement in patients between the age of 50 and 70. METHODS: In this review, the existing evidence on the subject has been evaluated. RESULTS: Decision-making in this age group is heavily dependent on patient choice and patient-related factors. Mechanical valves in this age group are associated with an increased risk of bleeding while reoperations remain an important concern with bioprosthetic valves. Stroke rates have been reported to be largely similar in both valve types. CONCLUSION: There appears to be conflicting data on survival with some studies suggesting a survival benefit with mechanical valves.

Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 69 years: Analysis using Korean National Big Data.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes and long-term survival in patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) with mechanical versus bioprosthetic valves. METHODS: Patients aged 50-69 years who had undergone AVR from 2002 to 2018 were identified and their characteristics were collected from Korean National Health Information Database formed by the National Health Insurance Service, Republic of Korea. Of the 5792 patients, 1060 patients were excluded due to missing values on characteristics. Of the 4732 study patients, 1945 patients (41.1%) had received bioprosthetic valves (Group B) and 2787 patients (58.9%) had received mechanical valves (Group M). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to match 1429 patients in each group. Data on mortality, cardiac mortality, reoperations, cerebrovascular accidents, and bleeding complications were obtained. RESULTS: The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years postoperatively were 87.8% and 75.2% in the matched Group B and 91.2% and 76.7% in the matched Group M, respectively (p = .140). Freedom from cardiac death rates at postoperative 5 and 10 years were 95.6% and 92.4% in the matched Group B and 96.0% and 92.1% in the matched Group M, respectively (p = .540). The cumulative incidence of reoperation was higher in the matched Group B than in the matched Group M (p = .007), and the cumulative incidence of major bleeding was higher in the matched Group M than in the matched Group B (p = .039). CONCLUSION: In patients aged 50-69 years who underwent isolated AVR, the patients who received bioprosthetic valves showed similar cardiac mortality-free survival and long-term survival rates to the patients who received mechanical valves.

Acute biological mitral valve thrombosis after the left atrial venting in a patient with a venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator.

BACKGROUND: Left atrial venting through atrial septotomy in patients with decreased left ventricular (LV) contractility after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a simple and effective method for treating LV decompression. MATERIALS & METHODS: We report a case of prosthetic mitral valve thrombosis after left atrial venting in a patient with VA-ECMO. RESULTS: In patients undergoing mitral valve replacement, left atrial venting reduces the flow through the mitral valve and forms a prosthetic thrombosis. DISCUSSION: Therefore, excessive left atrial venting should be avoided. Other venting methods that can maintain the flow through the mitral valve should be considered after mitral valve replacement.

Transapical mitral valve repair procedures: Primetime for microinvasive mitral valve surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays micro-invasive-procedures (off-pump, beating-heart) for mitral valve repair (MVRe) are abruptly expanding with the potential to be adopted as a valuable alternative to surgery. In the present manuscript, the authors review the available technologies intended to treat mitral regurgitation (MR) through transapical approach, including annuloplasty and chordal-repair options. ANNULOPLASTY: To date, Valcare Amend is the only transapical MV ring to have been implanted in patients. The device allows for stabilization of the annulus through a complete semirigid d-shaped ring. The first-in-human successful procedure was performed in 2016 by our Group and subsequent clinical experience included a total of 14 implanted patients. Currently, the technology is under clinical trial evaluation to validate the efficacy and safety profile of the device. CHORDAL REPAIR: Beating-heart chordal implantation via transapical approach is a current feasible, safe and reproducible option. Neochord DS1000 is the most widely used technology in the field, with a solid procedural experience and good results in well-selected patients. Its clinical use has been validated in Europe since 2012, while it is still under clinical investigation in the United States. Harpoon MVRe system is a novel technology, recently CE-mark approved for clinical use. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Transapical micro-invasive technologies are current viable therapies to treat MR in selected patients. Although there are still several limitations that preclude an extensive use of such procedures, their results are promising in well-selected patients. Embracing transcatheter MVRe therapies should guide the cardiac surgeon through the new revolution of micro-invasive MV tailored repair.

Aortic valve neocuspidization using autologous pericardium compared to surgical aortic valve replacement.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic valve neocuspidization (AVNeo) for trileaflet aortic valve reconstruction using autologous pericardium (Ozaki procedure) depicts an encouraging new technique for the surgical treatment of aortic valve pathologies. The current study analyzes the early hemodynamic outcome of AVneo compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) using the Abbott/St. Jude Trifecta aortic valve biological prostheses. METHODS: All patients who underwent either AVNeo or SAVR between March 2017 and April 2020 were included. Exclusion criteria were emergency cases, endocarditis, redo- or additional root procedures. Main endpoints were differences between the two groups in terms of the effective orifice area (EOA) and the effective orifice area index (EOAI) at discharge. RESULTS: During the study period, 105 AVNeo patients and 458 SAVR patients met the inclusion criteria. EOA was significantly higher in the AVNeo group (2.4 cm2 ± 0.8 vs. 2.1 cm2 /m2 ± 0.6 in the SAVR group, respectively; p < .001). Multiple regression analysis, including AVNeo, annulus size, bicuspid valve, preoperative stenosis, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and diastolic diameter (LVEDD) found two factors, which favor larger EOA: Annulus size (p < .0001) and AVneo (p = .005). EOAI was significantly higher in the AVNeo group (1.23 ± 0.4 vs. 1.02 cm2 /m2 ± 0.3, respectively; p < .001). Multiple regression analysis for EOAI showed effects for AVneo (p = .005) and bicuspid valve (p = .029). Mean pressure gradients (MPG) were lower in the AVNeo group than in the SAVR group (AVNeo: MPG = 8.0 mmHg ± 3.6 vs. SAVR: MPG = 8.3 mmHg ± 3.6), but this finding did not reach statistical significance (p = .091). CONCLUSIONS: AVNeo shows significantly larger EOA and EOAI compared to SAVR using the Abbott/St. Jude Trifecta aortic valve biological prostheses.

Transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement transeptally using a novel balloon-expandable device.

We describe a patient with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation, due to a failed 33-mm Epic (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN) bioprosthetic heart valve surgically implanted 10-year before. For this specific purpose, we implanted a novel balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve, the MyVal (Meril Life Science, Vapi, India). To the best of our knowledge, this is the second case describing the implantation of MyVal in a degenerative, surgically placed bioprosthesis.

Risk factors and mortality associated with permanent pacemaker after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement: Early versus late implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Inflation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has increased the number of patients requiring a postprocedure permanent pacemaker (PPM). We investigate the impact of PPM on mid-term mortality comparing SAVR versus TAVR procedures and risk factors for early and late (>14 days) need of PPM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center evaluation of 903 patients that underwent either SAVR or TAVR procedures at the Yale New Haven Hospital from 2012 to 2017. Patients were stratified into PPM and non-PPM groups. We performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analysis to characterize mid-term mortality. Further subgroup analysis was performed to identify risk factors for early and late PPM implantation in the TAVR cohort. RESULTS: There was no correlation between PPM implantation and mid-term mortality in both SAVR (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.69; confidence interval [CI] = 0.21-2.30; p = .56) and TAVR (HR = 0.70; CI = 0.42-1.17; p = .18) patients. The presence of the right bundle branch block (Odds ratio = 24.07; 95% CI = 2.34-247.64, p = .007) was associated with higher odds of early PPM requirement after TAVR procedures. CONCLUSION: PPM placement after SAVR or TAVR procedures is not associated with increased mid-term mortality. In-depth characterization of risk factors for early and late PPM implantation will require further analysis in the growing TAVR patient population.

Artificial chordae for mitral valve repair.

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve repair using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures to replace mitral chordae tendineae is a well-established procedure. However, the incidence of neo-chordae failure causing recurrent mitral regurgitation is not well defined. METHODS: We have reviewed the reported cases of complications after mitral valve repair related to the use of neo-chordae. This study was mainly carried out through PubMed, Medline, and Google Chrome websites. RESULTS: We have identified a total of 26 patients presenting with rupture of polytetrafluoroethylene neo-chordae, mostly being described as isolated cases. Few other cases of recurrent mitral regurgitation with hemolysis were found, where reoperation was not caused by neo-chordal failure but most likely by technical errors. At pathological investigation the findings were substantially similar in all reported cases. The neo-chordae retained their length and pliability, became covered with host tissue and rupture was mainly related to suture size. Mild calcification was observed not interfering with chordal function; chordal infection did never occur. CONCLUSIONS: The use of artificial neo-chordae provides excellent late results with durable mitral valve repair stability. Chordal rupture may occur late postoperatively leading to reoperation because of recurrent mitral regurgitation. Despite its rarity, this potential complication should not be overlooked during follow-up of patients after mitral valve repair using artificial neo-chordae.