Etiology and management outcomes of adult mechanical bowel obstruction in Nigeria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adult mechanical bowel obstruction (AMBO) has been previously reported to be majorly caused by hernias in developing countries. In Nigeria, however, there has been a recent change in pattern with adhesions now being the leading cause. The aim of this systematic review is to examine the changing pattern of the causes, and outcomes of patients managed for AMBO in Nigeria. METHODS: Relevant keywords relating to AMBO were used to conduct a search on PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and AJOL. The search returned 507 articles, which were subjected to title, abstract, and full text screenings, according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. This generated 10 articles which were included in the final qualitative synthesis. RESULTS: The total sample size across the 10 studies was 1033. Adhesions, hernias, and intra-abdominal tumors, responsible for 46.25%, 26.31%, and 12.23% of cases respectively, were the major causes of AMBO in Nigeria. 65.6% of cases were managed operatively and 34.4% were managed conservatively. The meta-analysis revealed high morbidity and mortality rates of 31% (95% CI: 17; 44, 5) and 11% (95% CI: 6; 15, 5), respectively, among adult patients managed for mechanical bowel obstruction in Nigeria. CONCLUSIONS: Adhesion, which results predominantly from appendicectomy is the most common cause of AMBO in Nigeria. This is unlike former reports where hernia was the most common cause. Morbidity results majorly from wound infection, recurrent adhesions, and postoperative enterocutaneous fistula. The mortality rate is similar to reports from various West African studies, and it is significantly influenced by surgical intervention time.

Risk of Bowel Obstruction After Hysterectomy for Benign Indication According to Surgical Method in Denmark, 1984-2013.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To estimate the risk of bowel obstruction (BO) after hysterectomy for benign indications depending on the surgical method (abdominal, vaginal, or laparoscopic) and identify risk factors for adhesive BO. DESIGN: A national registry-based cohort. SETTING: Danish hospitals during the period 1984-2013. PATIENTS: Danish women who underwent hysterectomy for benign indications (N = 125 568). INTERVENTIONS: Abdominal hysterectomies were compared with vaginal hysterectomies, laparoscopic hysterectomies, and minimally invasive (vaginal and laparoscopic) hysterectomies. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The incidence of BO according to the surgical method was compared using Cox proportional hazard regression. The covariates included were the time period, age, concomitant operations, previous abdominal surgery or disease, and socioeconomic factors. In a subanalysis (n = 35 712 women) of the period 2004-2013, detailed information from the Danish Hysterectomy Database enabled the inclusion of patient-, surgery-, and complication-related covariates. The overall crude incidence of BO was 17.4 of 1000 hysterectomies (2196 incident cases). The 10-year cumulative incidence of BO differed among the surgical routes (abdominal, 1.7%; laparoscopic, 1.4%; and vaginal, 0.9%). In multiple-adjusted analyses, the risk of BO was higher after abdominal hysterectomy than after vaginal (hazard ratio 1.64 [95% confidence interval, 1.39-1.93]) and minimally invasive (vaginal or laparoscopic) hysterectomy (hazard ratio 1.54 [1.33-1.79]). Additional pre-existing risk factors for BO at the time of hysterectomy were increased age, low education, low income, smoking, high American Society of Anesthesiologists comorbidity score, history of infertility, abdominal infection, and previous abdominal surgery (apart from cesarean section), penetrating lesions in abdominal organs, or operative adhesiolysis. Perioperative risk factors at the time of hysterectomy included concomitant removal of the ovaries, adhesiolysis, blood transfusion, readmission, and overall presence of perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: Abdominal hysterectomy is associated with a 54% higher risk of BO than minimally invasive (laparoscopic or vaginal) hysterectomy.

HPV infection and vaginal microecological disorders in women with intrauterine adhesion: cross-sectional study in a Chinese population.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the vaginal microecology and the distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) subtypes in patients with uterine adhesions and explore the correlation between HPV infection and vaginal microecology imbalance and the occurrence of intrauterine adhesion (IUA). METHODS: A total of 479 women were enrolled in the study, including 259 in the normal group and 220 in the IUA group. Vaginal microecological and HPV analyses were performed on all participants. Significant differences between the two groups were analyzed, and Spearman correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS: The incidence of IUA in patients between 31 and 40 years of age was high. The I-II degree of vaginal cleanliness in the IUA group was significantly lower than that in the normal group, and the number of III-IV degree was significantly higher than that in the normal group. Moreover, the incidences of VVC (vulvovaginal candidiasis) and vaginal disorders and infections with HPV 16 and HPV 52 subtypes were significantly higher in the IUA group than in the normal group. The incidence of high-risk HPV infection combined with vaginal disorders in the IUA group was higher than that in the normal group. Correlation analysis showed that the occurrence of IUAs was positively correlated with HPV infection and negatively correlated with PH and vaginal microecological imbalance. CONCLUSION: The HPV infection rate and vaginal microecology disorders affect the occurrence of IUAs. For patients with IUAs, control of the HPV infection rate and the prevention of vaginal microecological disorders should be improved.

Incidence of Intrauterine Adhesions After Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in Patients Seeking Fertility.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after hysteroscopic myomectomy. Previous studies report a range of incidence for IUAs after hysteroscopic myomectomy. DESIGN: A retrospective review study. SETTING: An academic community hospital in the Boston metropolitan area. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing hysteroscopic myomectomy at our institution from January 2019 to February 2022. Patients were excluded if they did not have plans for future fertility or had a new diagnosis of cancer. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent hysteroscopic myomectomy using bipolar resectoscope without postoperative medical or barrier treatment. All procedures were performed by 1 of 4 fellowship-trained high-volume gynecologic surgeons with resident and fellow assistance. Incidence of postoperative IUAs was assessed and treated using second-look office hysteroscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 44 patients without preoperative IUAs underwent hysteroscopic myomectomy during our study period, and 4 patients (9.1%) developed new IUAs. Among 9 patients who were found to have preoperative IUAs and underwent concurrent hysteroscopic myomectomy and lysis of adhesions, we found a recurrence of IUAs in 5 patients (55.6%). We found the number, size, and deepest type of myoma removed were not correlated to an increased risk of new IUA formation. In addition, removing myomas on opposing walls during the same operation did not increase the incidence of new IUAs. CONCLUSION: Formation of IUAs after hysteroscopic myomectomy is a well-documented consequence. Our reported incidence of 9.1% of new IUAs that are not affected by the number, size, deepest type of myoma resected, and resection of myomas on opposing uterine walls contributes to the current literature. In addition, our finding of 55.6% of recurrent IUAs in patients undergoing both hysteroscopic myomectomy and lysis of adhesions highlights a high-risk population requiring additional study.

Risk factors for small-bowel obstruction after colectomy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Postoperative adhesions are a concerning complication of abdominal surgery with major implications on quality of life. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for postoperative small-bowel obstruction (SBO) after colectomy for colorectal cancer. METHODS: We reviewed the clinicopathological variables of 1646 patients who underwent colectomy for colorectal cancer between 2009 and 2018. RESULTS: SBO occurred following primary tumor resection for colorectal cancer in 67 (4.1%) of the 1646 patients. The median observation period was 7.5 (range: 3.0-12.0) years. Multivariate analysis revealed that rectal tumors, anastomotic leakages, previous abdominal surgeries, and longer operating times were all correlated with postoperative SBO, but there were no differences in the incidence of SBO between laparoscopic vs. open surgery. The use of adhesion prevention material had no effect on SBO. Our data showed that the onset of SBO tended to be relatively early, within a year after surgery (89.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor localization in the rectum is associated with several problems, including a wide resection area, prolonged operative duration, and high risk of anastomotic leakage, which may increase the risk of SBO. Laparoscopic surgery and adhesion prevention material did not demonstrate a clear preventive effect against SBO.

Prevalence and risk factors of intrauterine adhesions in women with a septate uterus: a retrospective cohort study.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the prevalence and risk factors of intrauterine adhesions (IUA) in patients with a septate uterus? DESIGN: In this retrospective cohort study, patients with a septate uterus who underwent septum resection between 2015 and 2020 were analysed. Two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography plus hysteroscopy was used to diagnose uterine septum or IUA. The prevalence and risk factors for IUA in patients with a septate uterus were examined. RESULTS: Among 522 eligible patients with a septate uterus, 165 patients were diagnosed with IUA (prevalence 31.6% [95% CI 27.7 to 35.5%]). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis of risk factors for IUA, patients who had experienced one or more miscarriages were more likely to have IUA than patients who had not (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.96 to 5.83, P < 0.001, and OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.24 to 5.23, P = 0.011, respectively). Patients who underwent one or more dilatation and curettage (D&C) procedures had a significantly increased risk of IUA compared with patients who did not (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.87 to 6.26, P < 0.001, and OR 3.99, 95% CI 1.93 to 8.26, P < 0.001, respectively). For patients with a history of miscarriage or D&C, the prevalence rates of IUA were 46.5% (95% CI 40.6 to 52.4%) and 44.0% (95% CI 38.5 to 49.5%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-third of patients with a septate uterus have concomitant IUA. A previous miscarriage or D&C is an important risk factor for IUA in patients with a septate uterus.

Adhesion-related readmissions after open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery in 16 524 patients.

AIM: Colorectal surgery is associated with a high risk of adhesion formation and subsequent complications. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery reduces adhesion formation by 50%; however, the effect on adhesion-related complications is still unknown. This study aims to compare differences in incidence rates of adhesion-related readmissions after laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery. METHOD: Population data from the Scottish National Health Service were used to identify patients who underwent colorectal surgery between June 2009 and June 2011. Readmissions were registered until December 2017 and categorized as being either directly or possibly related to adhesions, or as reoperations potentially complicated by adhesions. The primary outcome measure was the difference in incidence of directly adhesion-related readmissions between the open and laparoscopic cohort. RESULTS: Colorectal surgery was performed in 16 524 patients; 4455 (27%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were readmitted less frequently for directly adhesion-related complications, 2.4% (95% CI 2.0%-2.8%) versus 7.5% (95% CI 7.1%-7.9%) in the open cohort. Readmissions for possibly adhesion-related complications were less frequent in the laparoscopic cohort, 16.8% (95% CI 15.6%-18.0%) versus 21.7% (95% CI 20.9%-22.5%), as well as reoperations potentially complicated by adhesions, 9.7% (95% CI 8.9%-10.5%) versus 16.9% (95% CI 16.3%-17.5%). CONCLUSION: Overall, any adhesion-related readmissions occurred in over one in three patients after open colorectal surgery and one in four after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Compared with open surgery, incidence rates of adhesion-related complications decrease but remain substantial after laparoscopic surgery.

Incidence of adhesions in patients using liraglutide before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The current study objectively identified the incidence of adhesions between the stomach and pancreas in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) patients on liraglutide (cases group) and off (control group) liraglutide. METHODS: This observational prospective study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at Saudi German Hospital, Al-Aseer, Saudi Arabia (SGH) after approval by the Institutional Review Board. 117 patients with prior use of liraglutide and 101 patients with no liraglutide use scheduled for LSG over 12 months were included. Inclusion criteria included patients undergoing LSG with or without prior use of liraglutide. Exclusion criteria included patients with prior abdominal surgeries, bariatric surgery revisions, prior upper GI scope showing gastritis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) or any other pathology, and other known causes of other causes of pancreatitis. Using laparoscopy obtained imaging during LSG cases adhesions between the posterior stomach and pancreas were identified. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the cases and control groups was 32.44 ± 9.90 years and 28.23 ± 8.48 years (p = 0.001). The mean BMI of patients in the cases and control groups was 43.56 ± 4.59 and 45.00 ± 4.78, respectively (p = 0.024). 85% of the patients were females, while 17.0% were males in the cases group. 53.5% of the patients were females, while 47.0% were males in the control group (p < 0.001). In the cases group, 48.7% of patients had stopped liraglutide for no obvious reason. Under the cases group, 77.8% of the patients had no adhesions, while 22.2% had adhesions. Under the controls group, no adhesions were seen (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results for the first time demonstrate an incidence of adhesions in 22.2% of patients undergoing LSG on prior liraglutide intake (p < 0.001). This study brings to light the possibility of adhesions in patients with prior exposure to liraglutide undergoing LSG. Surgeons performing LSG in patients with prior exposure to liraglutide should be cognizant of this possibility, thereby requiring careful meticulous dissection.

Prevalence of Intrauterine Adhesions after Myomectomy: A Prospective Multicenter Observational Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate intrauterine adhesion formation after laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy. DESIGN: This is a prospective, multicenter, observational study (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04030273). METHODS: We included patients after laparotomic and laparoscopic myomectomy. All patients underwent postsurgical diagnostic hysteroscopy, after 3 months. The intrauterine adhesion rate and associated factors were investigated. RESULTS: Between January 2020 and December 2020, 38 and 24 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy, respectively. All diagnostic hysteroscopies were performed in the office setting without complications. Intrauterine adhesions were identified in 19.4% of women (95% CI: of 9-29%). Factors univariately associated (p < 0.2) with the presence of intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy were previous uterine surgery, the surgical approach (laparoscopic or laparotomic), the number of removed fibroids, the type and diameter of the largest myoma, and the opening of the uterine cavity. In the multivariable analysis, only the opening of the uterine cavity (odds ratio [OR] 51.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.53-596.28) and the laparotomic approach (OR, 16.19; 95% CI: 1.66-158.35) were independently associated with the identification of intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy. LIMITATIONS: One of the main limitations of our study is that we used uterine manipulator only in the laparoscopic group; in addition, we did not perform a preoperative hysteroscopy to evaluate the rate of intrauterine adhesions potentially present even before the myomectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after 3 months from surgery was significantly associated with the opening of the uterine cavity and the laparotomic approach.

Hysteroscopic findings after laparoscopic and open myomectomy with or without uterine cavity breach: historical cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate hysteroscopic findings after laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy with a focus on the presence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions in groups of patients with and without perioperative uterine cavity breach (UCB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study. Our database was searched to identify patients with UCB during myomectomy and matched the same number of patients after myomectomy without UCB to create a control group. All relevant data were retrieved from our medical records. In both groups, the results of follow-up hysteroscopy were analyzed. RESULTS: Low prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy was observed in only 3.5% of the 170 patients in our samples. No significant difference in the occurrence of synechiae between the patients with and without UCB was found (2 vs. 4, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.7, p = .341), nor was the difference in other hysteroscopic findings. Follow-up hysteroscopy was performed with slender optics and expandable casing system without need of any anesthesia in 87.1% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, the prevalence of post-myomectomy intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy is low. Our study did not demonstrate that UCB during myomectomy is a risk factor for the formation of intrauterine synechiae.

Predictive value of live birth rate based on different intrauterine adhesion evaluation systems following TCRA.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of five different intrauterine adhesion (IUA) evaluation systems for live birth rate following transcervical resection of adhesion (TCRA). METHOD: This retrospective study included 128 women with IUA who desired for spontaneous conception after TCRA. All the patients were retrospectively scored by the American Fertility Society (AFS) classification, European Society of Gynecological Endoscopy (ESGE) classification, March's classification (March), Nasr classification (Nasr) and Chinese IUA diagnosis classification criteria (Chinese). The predictive value of these evaluation systems was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under a ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: The correlation coefficients of AFS, ESGE, March, Nasr and Chinese classification and the live birth rate were 0.313, 0.313, 0.288, 0.380, and 0.336, respectively. Among women with hypomenorrhea and amenorrhea, as well as women with no infertility, the severities determined by all five evaluation systems were correlated with live birth rate (P <  0.001). All five scoring systems were efficient to predict live birth rate. Among them, Nasr classification showed the highest AUC (0.748) with the best predictive value. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that Nasr classification had the highest OR (OR, 6.523; 95% CI, 2.612, 18.263). And, Nasr's classification system also showed highest sensitivity (81.8%) and negative predictive value (96.7%) when divide the system into mild IUA vs. moderate and severe IUA. CONCLUSION: AFS, ESGE, March, Nasr and Chinese classification were demonstrated to be capable of predicting live birth following TCRA although the predictive capacities might be limited, and Nasr classification showed the highest predictive value of live birth.

Clinical adhesion score (CLAS): development of a novel clinical score for adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Adhesions are a major cause of long-term postsurgical complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery. Existing adhesion scores primarily measure morphological characteristics of adhesions that do not necessarily correlate with morbidity. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical adhesion score (CLAS) measuring overall clinical morbidity of adhesion-related complications in abdominal and pelvic surgery. METHODS: An international Delphi study was performed to identify relevant score items for adhesion-related complications, including small bowel obstruction, female infertility, chronic abdominal or pelvic pain, and difficulties at reoperation. The CLAS includes clinical outcomes, related to morbidity of adhesions, and weight factors, to correct the outcome scores for the likelihood that symptoms are truly caused by adhesions. In a pilot study, two independent researchers retrospectively scored the CLAS in 51 patients to evaluate inter-observer reliability, by calculating the Intraclass correlation coefficient. During a feasibility assessment, we evaluated whether the CLAS completely covered different clinical scenarios of adhesion-related morbidity. RESULTS: Three Delphi rounds were performed. 43 experts agreed to participate, 38(88%) completed the first round, and 32 (74%) the third round. Consensus was reached on 83.4% of items. Inter-observer reliability for the CLAS was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97). During feasibility assessment, six items were included. As a result, the CLAS includes 22 outcomes and 23 weight factors. CONCLUSION: The CLAS represents a promising scoring system to measure and monitor the clinical morbidity of adhesion-related complications. Further studies are needed to confirm its utility in clinical practice.

Prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions using striae gravidarum and scar characteristics in women undergoing repeated cesarean sections.

BACKGROUND: The current fact of increasing rates of cesarean deliveries is a catastrophe. Recurrent cesareans result in intraperitoneal adhesions that would lead to maternal morbidity during delivery. Great efforts are directed towards the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions to provide the best care for laboring women. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of abdominal striae and cesarean scar characters in the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions. METHODS: This was a case- control study conducted in the emergency ward of the obstetrics and gynecology department of a tertiary hospital from June to December 2019. The study was carried on patients admitted to the ward fulfilling particular inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study included two groups, group one was assessed for the presence of striae, and the degree of intraperitoneal adhesions was evaluated during the current cesarean section. Group two included patients without evidence of abdominal striae. They were evaluated for the severity of adhesions also after evaluation of the previous scar. Evaluation of the striae was done using Davey's scoring system. The scar was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale. The modified Nair's scoring system was used to evaluate intraperitoneal adhesions. RESULTS: The study group included 203 women, while the control group included 205 women. There were significant differences in the demographic characters of the recruited patients (p-value 0.001 for almost all variables). The mean Davey score in those with mild, moderate, and severe striae was 1.82 ± 0.39, 3.57 ± 0.5, and 6.73 ± 0.94, respectively (p-value < 0.001). Higher scores for the parameters of the Vancouver scale were present in patients with severe striae (1.69 ± 1.01, 1.73 ± 0.57, 2.67 ± 1.23, and 1.35 ± 1.06 for scar vascularity, pigmentation, pliability, and height respectively with a p-value of < 0.001 each). Thick intraperitoneal adhesions were noted significantly in women with severe striae [21 (43.75%), p-value < 0.001)]. The Davey's and Vancouver scores showed highly significant predictive performance in the prediction of intraperitoneal adhesions (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Abdominal striae and cesarean scar were significant predictors for intraperitoneal adhesions.

Effectiveness of barrier agents for preventing postoperative bowel obstruction after laparoscopic surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of using anti-adhesion agents in laparoscopic surgery is controversial. We compared the outcomes of patients exposed to anti-adhesion agents (barrier group) with those of patients not exposed (no barrier group) in laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: Using a nationwide claim-based database in Japan, we analyzed data from patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery between 2005 and 2019 and compared the patient characteristics and the proportion of those with bowel obstruction between the barrier and no barrier groups. We also performed several sensitivity and subgroup analyses. RESULTS: Of the 57,499 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 14,360 and 43,139 were assigned to the barrier and no barrier groups, respectively. The proportion of patients with a bowel obstruction in the two groups did not differ among all patients hospitalized for obstruction (1.1 vs. 1.1%, p = 0.63) and those requiring surgery (0.2 vs. 0.2%, p = 0.39). In the sensitivity analysis with propensity score matching, the incidences of bowel obstruction between the barrier and non-barrier groups were equivocal (1.3 vs. 1.6%), but statistically marginal (chi-square test, p = 0.035; log-rank test, p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The use of barrier agents for adhesive prevention did not show clear effectiveness for the prevention of bowel obstruction after laparoscopic surgery for unselected cases. Further studies focusing on more specific procedures are needed.

[Features of diagnosis and treatment of elderly and senile patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.]

Adhesive small bowel obstruction is a common pathology with a tendency to increase characterized by a complex pathogenetic course with a high percentage of complications and deaths. Among the forms of intestinal obstruction caused by mechanical obstacles acute small bowel obstruction ranges from 64,3 to 80% with a mortality rate of 5,1 to 8,4% in the structure of urgent diseases. The complexity of early diagnosis along with an erased clinical picture severe course against a burdened background as well as age - in elderly and senile people leads to the search for new optimized treatment and diagnostic protocols. The purpose of this study was to study the nature of the course of adhesive small bowel obstruction in elderly and senile people to establish the information content of various diagnostic methods to determine the indications for the choice of the optimal period and method of treatment. A comparative analysis of 191 patients aged 60 to 90 years and older who received treatment in the surgical departments of St. Elizabeth Hospital (St. Petersburg) in the period from 2016-2019 was carried out. All patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group consisted of 106 patients (2018-2019) the comparison group included 85 patients (2016-2017). All patients of the main group used an improved diagnostic and treatment algorithm with the use of an original point-assessment scale which made it possible to optimize diagnostics and improve treatment results. Patients in the comparison group were examined in accordance with standard protocols and surgical treatment was carried out exclusively by traditional methods. The use of the proposed therapeutic and diagnostic algorithm made it possible to increase the probability of conservative resolution of acute adhesive small bowel obstruction from 20% (17) to 33% (35) and to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications from 60,2% (41) to 25,3% (18), p<0,01, and the mortality rate from 23,5% (16) to 7% (5), p<0,05.

Reproductive outcomes of infertile women undergoing "see and treat" office hysteroscopy: a retrospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of office hysteroscopy to diagnose and treat the specific uterine pathologies frequently diagnosed and thought to be associated with female infertility. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using office hysteroscopy, we examined the uterine cavity in women with primary or secondary infertility and evaluated the reproductive outcomes of those affected by one or more pathologies, including cervico-isthmic adhesions, intrauterine polyps and intrauterine adhesions. Additional patient characteristics considered were age and parity, uterine pathology, pain during hysteroscopy, and outcomes including spontaneous pregnancies achieved and time between treatment and pregnancy. RESULTS: Reproductive outcomes of 200 patients affected by one or more uterine pathologies were evaluated. Cervico-isthmic adhesions were the most frequent findings in older women, with nearly 80% of them achieving pregnancy sooner than the others in our study. Spontaneous pregnancy rates following office hysteroscopy were 76%, 53% and 22% in women with cervico-isthmic adhesions, polyps (< 5 mm) and intrauterine adhesions, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Office hysteroscopy is a feasible and highly effective diagnostic and therapeutic procedure for cervico-isthmic and intrauterine adhesions, as well as for small polyps, allowing the resolution of female infertility related to these pathologies, without trauma and with only minimal discomfort.

Population Level Analysis of Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Sustained Advantage of a Laparoscopic Approach.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of open versus laparoscopic surgery on the development of adhesive small bowel obstruction (aSBO). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: aSBO is a significant contributor to short and long-term postoperative morbidity. Laparoscopy has demonstrated a protective effect in colorectal surgery, but these effects have not been generalized to other abdominal procedures. METHODS: Population level California state data (1995-2010) was analyzed. We identified patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, appendectomy, and hysterectomy. The primary outcome was aSBO. Clinical, patient, and hospital characteristics were assessed using Kaplan-Meir methodology and Cox regression analysis adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and operative approach. RESULTS: We included 1,612,629 patients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. The 5-year incidence rate of aSBO was higher after open surgery compared with laparoscopic surgery for each procedure (RYGB 2.1% vs. 1.5%, P < 0.001; cholecystectomy 2.2% vs. 0.65%, P < 0.001; partial colectomy 5.5% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001; appendectomy 0.58% vs. 0.35%, P < 0.001; and hysterectomy 0.89% vs. 0.54%, P < 0.001). The period of greatest risk for aSBO formation was within the first 2-years. In multivariate analysis, an open approach was associated with an increased risk of aSBO for each procedure [RYGB hazard ratio (HR) 1.24, P < 0.001; cholecystectomy HR 1.89, P < 0.001; partial colectomy HR 1.49, P < 0.001; appendectomy HR 1.45, P < 0.001; and hysterectomy HR 1.16, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy is associated with a significant and sustained reduction in the rate of aSBO. The period of greatest risk for aSBO is within the first 2 years after surgery.

Laparoscopic Compared With Open Resection for Colorectal Cancer and Long-term Incidence of Adhesional Intestinal Obstruction and Incisional Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction are important complications of laparoscopic and open resection for colorectal cancer. This is the largest systematic review of comparative studies on this topic. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether laparoscopic surgery decreases the incidence of incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction compared to open surgery for colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: Online databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Abstracts from the annual meetings of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and the European Society of Coloproctology were performed to cover gray literature. STUDY SELECTION: We included both randomized and nonrandomized comparative studies. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic resection was compared to open resection for patients with colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction. RESULTS: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria (6 randomized comparative studies/9 nonrandomized comparative studies); 84,172 patients. Meta-analysis showed decreased odds of developing incisional hernia in the laparoscopic cohort (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66-0.95; p = 0.01) but no difference in requirement for surgery (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.64-1.79; p = 0.79). Similarly, there were decreased odds of developing adhesional intestinal obstruction in the laparoscopic cohort (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72-0.92, p = 0.001), but no difference in requirement for surgery (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.53-1.35; p = 0.48). LIMITATIONS: Incisional hernia and adhesional intestinal obstruction were poorly defined in many studies. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery is associated with decreased odds of incisional hernias and adhesional intestinal obstructions compared with open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Zinc-Impregnated Mesh for Abdominal Wall Repair Reduces Infection in a Rat Model of Peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess whether a zinc-impregnated polypropylene mesh (ZnMesh) has better antibacterial properties in a contaminated environment compared with a regular polypropylene mesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight Wistar Han rats underwent cecal ligation and puncture to induce peritonitis 24 h before implantation of an intraperitoneal ZnMesh or a regular polypropylene mesh. Primary outcome was the number of colony forming units (CFU) per sample (mesh and abdominal wall). Secondary outcomes were macroscopic (incorporation of mesh, abscesses, and adhesions on mesh surface) and histological (inflammatory cell reaction, mesh-specific parameters, and collagen deposition) parameters. All outcomes were evaluated after 30 and 90 d. RESULTS: After 30 d, no significant difference in CFU per sample was present between the ZnMesh and control groups. After 90 d, a lower number of CFU per sample was present in the ZnMesh group compared with the control group (trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood: 0 log10 CFU/sample IQR: 0-1.40 versus 1.58 log10 CFU/sample IQR: 0-4.30, P = 0.012; MacConkey: 0 log10 CFU/sample IQR: 0-2.65 versus 1.18 log10 CFU/sample IQR: 0-4.04, P = 0.438). After 90 d, the percentage of adhesions on mesh surface was significantly higher in the ZnMesh group (95% IQR: 60%-100% versus 50% IQR: 23%-75%, P = 0.029). No differences were seen in other macroscopic outcomes or histology. CONCLUSIONS: A significantly lower number of CFU per sample was found in the ZnMesh group after 90 d. After 30 d, no statistically significant differences in CFU per sample were seen. This result suggests that the ZnMesh group has better antibacterial properties in a contaminated environment. However, this is at the cost of a significantly higher percentage of adhesions.

Effect of Previous Abdominal Surgery on Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Previous abdominal surgery (PAS) is a relative contraindication of laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of PAS on the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (LRYGB) in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted for a total of 235 consecutive patients with obesity and T2DM from Shanghai Tongren Hospital from February 2011 to December 2015. The patients were classified into two groups: no previous abdominal surgery group (NPAS group, n = 179) and previous abdominal surgery group (PAS group, n = 56). The patients underwent LRYGB, and the data of basic information, presence of adhesions, adhesiolysis requirement, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and perioperative and postoperative complications were collected and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Adhesion was found in 14 patients in the NPAS group and in 43 patients in the PAS group, with adhesiolysis requirement in 4 (2.23%) and 37 (66.07%) patients, respectively (P < 0.05). There were no complications directly associated with adhesiolysis. No patients were converted to open surgery. There were no significant differences in gender (P = 0.30), T2DM duration (P = 0.58), body mass index (P = 0.06), blood loss (P = 0.36), or perioperative or postoperative complications (P = 0.41) between the groups. Significant differences were observed in the mean age, ASA score, operative time, and hospital stay between the groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PAS is relatively safe and feasible for LRYGB in Chinese patients with obesity and T2DM.