Predictors of Anastomotic Failure After Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Does Technique Matter?

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic failure (AF) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains a dreaded complication. Whether specific factors, including anastomotic technique, are associated with AF is poorly understood. METHODS: Patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC including at least one bowel resection between 2000 and 2017 from 12 academic institutions were reviewed to determine factors associated with AF (anastomotic leak or enteric fistula). RESULTS: Among 1020 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the median age was 55 years, 43.9% were male, and the most common histology was appendiceal neoplasm (62.3%). The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 14, and 93.2% of the patients underwent CC0/1 resection. Overall, 82 of the patients (8%) experienced an AF, whereas 938 (92.0%) did not. In the multivariable analysis, the factors associated with AF included male gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.2; p < 0.01), left-sided colorectal resection (OR 10.0; p = 0.03), and preoperative albumin (OR 1.8 per g/dL; p = 0.02).Technical factors such as method (stapled vs hand-sewn), timing of anastomosis, and chemotherapy regimen used were not associated with AF (all p > 0.05). Anastomotic failure was associated with longer hospital stay (23 vs 10 days; p < 0.01), higher complication rate (90% vs 59%; p < 0.01), higher reoperation rate (41% vs 9%; p < 0.01), more 30-day readmissions (59% vs 22%; p < 0.01), greater 30-day mortality (9% vs 1%; p < 0.01), and greater 90-day mortality (16% vs 8%; p = 0.02) as well as shorter median overall survival (25.6 vs 66.0 months; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, AF is independently associated with postoperative morbidity and worse long-term outcomes. Because patient- and tumor-related, but not technical, factors are associated with AF, operative technique may be individualized based on patient considerations and surgeon preference.

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE): technique and outcomes of 100 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is the mainstay of therapy for esophageal cancer but is a complex operation that is associated with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates. The primary aim of this study is to report our perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival of Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (MILE). METHODS: IRB approved retrospective study of 100 consecutive patients who underwent elective MILE from September 2013 to November 2017 at University of Florida, Jacksonville. RESULTS: Primary diagnosis was esophageal cancer (n = 96) and benign esophageal disease (n = 4). Anastomotic leak rate was observed in 6%; 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 2% and 3%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 10.3 days; 87 patients were discharged to home, while 12 patients were discharged to rehabilitation facility, and there was one in-hospital mortality secondary to graft necrosis. At a mean follow-up was 37 months (2-74), the 3- and 5-year overall survivals are 63.9 ± 5.0% (95% CI 53.3-72.7%) and 60.5 ± 5.3% (95% CI 49.4-69.9%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival is 75.0 ± 4.8% (95% CI 64.2-83.0%) and 70.4 ± 5.5% (95% CI 58.0-80.0%). CONCLUSION: MILE can be performed with low perioperative mortality, and favorable long-term overall and disease-free survival.

Study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study on esophagogastric anastomoses and anastomotic leak (the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit/OGAA).

Esophagectomy is a mainstay in curative treatment for esophageal cancer; however, the reported techniques and outcomes can vary greatly. Thirty-day mortality of patients with an intact anastomosis is 2-3% as compared to 17-35% in patients who have an anastomotic leak. The subsequent management of leaks postesophagectomy has great global variability with little consensus on a gold standard of practice. The aim of this multicentre prospective audit is to analyze current techniques of esophagogastric anastomosis to determine the effect on the anastomotic leak rate. Leak rates and leak management will be assessed to determine their impact on patient outcomes. A 12-month international multicentre prospective audit started in April 2018 and is coordinated by a team from the West Midlands Research Collaborative. This will include patients undergoing esophagectomy over 9 months and encompassing a 90-day follow-up period. A pilot data collection period occurred at four UK centers in 2017 to trial the data collection form. The audit standards will include anastomotic leak and the conduit necrosis rate should be less than 13% and major postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo Grade III or more) should be less than 35%. The 30-day mortality rate should be less than 5% and the 90-day mortality rate should be less than 8%. This will be a trainee-led international audit of esophagectomy practice. Key support will be given by consultant colleagues and anesthetists. Individualized unit data will be distributed to the respective contributing sites. An overall anonymized report will be made available to contributing units. Results of the audit will be published in peer-reviewed journals with all collaborators fully acknowledged. The key information and results from the audit will be disseminated at relevant scientific meetings.

The individualized selection of Pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The mortality following pancreaticoduodenectomy has markedly decreased but remains an important challenge for the complexity of operation and technical skills involved. The present study aimed to clarify the impact of individualized pancreaticoenteric anastomosis and management to postoperative pancreatic fistula. METHODS: Data from 529 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies were retrospectively analysed from the Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit I, Peking Cancer Hospital. The pancreaticoenteric anastomosis was determined based on the pancreatic texture and diameter of the main pancreatic duct. The amylase value of the drainage fluid was dynamically monitored postoperatively on days 3, 5 and 7. A low speed intermittent irrigation was performed in selected patients. Intraoperative and postoperative results were collected and compared between the pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) group and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) group. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2019, 529 consecutive patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pancreaticogastrostomy was performed in 364 patients; pancreaticojejunostomy was performed in 150 patients respectively. The clinically relevant pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) was 9.8% and mortality was zero. The soft pancreas, diameter of main pancreatic duct≤3 mm, BMI ≥ 25, operation time > 330 min and pancreaticogastrostomy was correlated with postoperative pancreatic fistula significantly. The CR-POPF of PJ was significantly higher than that of PG in soft pancreas patients; the operation time of PJ was shorter than that of PG significantly in hard pancreas patients. Intraoperative blood loss and operation time of PG was less than that of PJ significantly in normal pancreatic duct patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Individualized pancreaticoenteric anastomosis should be determined based on the pancreatic texture and pancreatic duct diameter. The appropriate anastomosis and postoperative management could prevent mortality.

A Modified Side-to-Side Anastomosis Using a Circular Stapler Reduces Anastomotic Leakage in Colonic Surgery.

Background. Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the serious complications after colonic surgery. Method. A prospective interventional study to assess a modified technique of creating the ileocolic, colic-colic, and colorectal side-to-side anastomoses using a circular stapler. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this technique in the reduction of AL. Computed tomography scan was performed when AL was clinically suspected. Result. One hundred and forty-five patients who underwent colonic resection between January 2015 and August 2018 were included. One patient underwent surgery for severe inflammatory bowel disease, and the others underwent surgery for colonic cancer. The procedures were open surgeries, including right hemicolectomy (n = 79 [54.5%]), left hemicolectomy (n = 29 [20%]), sigmoidectomy (n = 30 [20.7%]), and transverse colectomy (n = 7 [4.8%]). In 23 patients with ascending colonic obstruction, emergency right colectomy with primary anastomosis was performed. Two surgeons performed the operations (52.4% and 47.6%, respectively), and intraoperative blood loss was 50 to 100 mL. The operative time was 160 to 240 minutes. There was no mortality postoperatively, and 26 (17.9%) patients developed complications. One patient who underwent transverse colonic cancer resection developed a clinical AL (0.7%). After ileostomy, the patient was discharged with no other serious complication. The median of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days (range = 5-18 days). Conclusion. This modified technique is a safe and efficient method for anastomotic configuration in colonic surgery.

[Exclusive coronary revascularization with both mammary arteries. Analysis of 73 patients]. / Resultados a 5 años de la revascularización exclusiva con dos arterias mamarias en pacientes con enfermedad coronaria multivaso.

BACKGROUND: Exclusive coronary revascularization with both mammary arteries could result in lower rates of adverse events in the long term. AIM: To describe the five-year evolution of a cohort of patients operated on with this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Follow up analyzing survival of 73 patients aged 59 ± 9 years (82% men) who underwent exclusive coronary surgery with two mammary arteries between December 1,2010 and April 12,2017. We studied their clinical characteristics, surgical results, operative morbidity and mortality and adverse events up to June 30, 2018. RESULTS: Six patients had two-vessel lesions and 67 three-vessel lesions. The operative risk calculated by additive and logistic EuroSCORE was 2.5 and 2.3%, respectively. A mean of 3.75 anastomoses /patient were performed, 116 with left mammary artery (73 to the anterior descending artery, 38 to a diagonal artery and 5 for other objectives) and 158 with right mammary artery (69 to a first marginal artery, 23 to a second marginal artery and 64 to posterior descending artery). There was one case of mediastinitis and one (1.5%) patient died. The mean follow-up was 64.6 ± 23.7 months. The 5-year survival was 90.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary revascularization with two exclusive mammary arteries allowed a complete revascularization of the heart with a low rate of complications and adverse effects at five years.

Magnetic compression technique for colonic anastomosis in rats.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic compression technique (MCT) is useful for construction of digestive tract anastomoses in pigs and dogs. This study determined the efficacy of MCT for performing colonic anastomosis in rats. METHODS: Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats (230-280 g) were randomly apportioned to a study group that underwent colonic anastomosis with MCT or a control group subjected to hand-sewn colonic anastomosis. The groups were compared for time to construct the anastomosis, survival rate, and postoperative complications. Animals were euthanized at 1 mo postsurgery to study the burst pressure and histology of the anastomoses. RESULTS: The study group required significantly less time to construct the anastomosis (6.50 ± 1.58 min) than did the control (15.6 ± 2.22 min). The survival rate of the study group (100%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (60%). In the control group, three rats developed anastomotic leakage and one rat developed anastomotic obstruction. No anastomotic leakage or obstruction was observed in the study group. The burst pressures of the two groups were similar. Histology showed that the study group had better alignment of the tissue layers and less inflammation compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: MCT is a safe and feasible technique for colonic anastomosis in rats, with better postoperative outcomes compared with hand-sewn anastomosis.

Predictors of complications and mortality following left colectomy with primary stapled anastomosis for cancer: results of a multicentric study with 1111 patients.

AIM: Reports detailing the morbidity-mortality after left colectomy are sparse and do not allow definitive conclusions to be drawn. We aimed to identify risk factors for anastomotic leakage, perioperative mortality and complications following left colectomy for colonic malignancies. METHOD: We undertook a STROBE-compliant analysis of left colectomies included in a national prospective online database. Forty-two variables were analysed as potential independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage, postoperative morbidity and mortality. Variables were selected using the 'least absolute shrinkage and selection operator' (LASSO) method. RESULTS: We analysed 1111 patients. Eight per cent of patients had a leakage and in 80% of them reoperation or surgical drainage was needed. A quarter of patients (24.9%) experienced at least one minor complication. Perioperative mortality was 2%, leakage being responsible for 47.6% of deaths. Obesity (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.00-7.05, P = 0.04) and total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.58-8.51, P = 0.002) were associated with increased risk of leakage, whereas female patients had a lower risk (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.67, P = 0.002). Corticosteroids (P = 0.03) and oral anticoagulants (P = 0.01) doubled the risk of complications, which was lower with hyperlipidaemia (OR 0.3, P = 0.02). Patients on TPN had more complications (OR 4.02, 95% CI 2.03-8.07, P = 0.04) and higher mortality (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.8-40.9, P = 0.006). Liver disease and advanced age impaired survival, corticosteroids being the strongest predictor of mortality (OR 21.5, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Requirement for TPN was associated with more leaks, complications and mortality. Leakage was presumably responsible for almost half of deaths. Hyperlipidaemia and female gender were associated with lower rates of complications. These findings warrant a better understanding of metabolic status on perioperative outcome after left colectomy.

Initial experience of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: 61 consecutive cases from a single Chinese institution.

This study aims to report the technical details and preliminary outcomes of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (RAILE) using two different types of intrathoracic anastomosis from a single institution in China. From May 2015 to October 2017, 61 patients diagnosed with mid-lower esophageal cancer were treated with RAILE. The RAILE procedure was performed in two stages. The first 35 patients underwent circular end-to-end stapled intrathoracic anastomosis (stapled group), and the remaining 26 patients had a double-layered, completely hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (hand-sewn group). Patient characteristics, surgical techniques, postoperative complications, and pathology outcomes were analyzed. The mean operating time and mean blood loss were 315.6 ± 59.4 minutes and 189.3 ± 95.8 mL, respectively. There was one patient who underwent conversion to thoracotomy. The 30-day and in-hospital mortality rates were 0%. Overall complications were observed in 22 patients (36.1%) according to the Clavien-Dindo (CD) and the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) classifications, of whom 6 patients (9.8%) had anastomotic leakage (ECCG, Type II). The median length of hospitalization (LOH) was 10 days (IQR, 5 days). Complete (R0) resection was achieved in all cases. The mean tumor size was 3.2 ± 1.5 cm, and the mean number of totally dissected lymph nodes was 19.3 ± 9.2. Regarding the operative outcomes between stapled and hand-sewn groups, there were no significant differences in the operative time (325.4 ± 66.6 vs. 302.3 ± 45.9 min, P = 0.114), blood loss (172.9 ± 74.1 vs. 211.5 ± 117.0 mL, P = 0.147), conversion rate (2.9 vs. 0%, P = 1.000), overall complication rate (37.1 vs. 34.6%, P = 0.839) or LOH (10 vs. 9.5 days, P = 0.415). RAILE using both stapled and hand-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis is safe and technically feasible with satisfactory perioperative outcomes for the treatment of mid-lower thoracic esophageal cancer.

Long-term outcomes of early compared to late onset choledochocholedochal anastomotic strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment of anastomotic biliary stricture (ABS) after liver transplantation (LT) has been proven to be effective and safe, but long-term outcomes of early compared to late onset ABS have not been studied. The aim of this study is to compare the long-term outcome of early ABS to late ABS. METHODS: Of the 806 adult LT recipients (04/2006-12/2012), 93 patients met the criteria for inclusion, and were grouped into non-ABS (no stenosis on ERCP, n=41), early ABS (stenosis <90 days after LT, 18 [19.3%]), and late ABS (stenosis ≥90 days after LT, 34 [36.5%]). A propensity matched control group for the ABS group (n=42) was obtained matched for outcome variables for age, gender, and calculated MELD score at listing. RESULTS: Mean number of ERCPs (2.33±1.3 vs 2.56±1.5, P=.69) were comparable between the groups; however, significantly better long-term resolution of the stricture was noted in the early ABS group (94.44% vs 67.65%, P=.04). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed worst survival in the early ABS group compared to the non-ABS, late ABS, and control groups (P=.0001). CONCLUSION: LT recipients with early ABS have inferior graft survival despite better response to endoscopic intervention.

Trends and Hospital Variations in Surgical Outcomes for Cholangiocarcinoma in New York State.

BACKGROUND: This population-based study examined surgical outcomes and hospital and post-acute care resource use after operations of cholangiocarcinoma during 2005-2012. STUDY DESIGN: Using New York State hospital claims, we identified subjects with intrahepatic tumor who underwent hepatectomy only (n = 2089), subjects with perihilar tumor who underwent hepatectomy and biliary-enteric anastomosis (BEA; n = 389) or BEA only (n = 3721), and subjects with distal cholangiocarcinoma undergoing pancreatectomy or pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 228). We performed trend analyses for each group and calculated overall risk-adjusted mortality, complication, and 30-day readmission rates for hospitals using multivariable logistic regressions. RESULTS: Mortality rate was roughly 12 % over years for perihilar cases undergoing hepatectomy and BEA, significantly higher than the rates of other 3 groups (p = 0.000). The overall complication rate was 40 % for subjects undergoing both hepatectomy and BEA, more than doubling the rate for subjects undergoing hepatectomy or BEA alone (p = 0.000). Average LOS declined markedly for perihilar cases undergoing hepatectomy and BEA (from 21 days in 2005 to 16 days in 2012) and subjects with distal cholangiocarcinoma (from 22 days in 2005 to 16 days in 2012), but other outcomes did not change dramatically. Risk-adjusted hospital outcome rates varied substantially. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical patients with cholangiocarcinoma incur considerable mortality, postoperative complications, and resource uses, especially among those undergoing hepatectomy and BEA for perihilar tumors.

To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, many surgeons place a prophylactic drain in the abdominal or pelvic cavity after colorectal anastomosis as a conventional treatment. However, some trials have demonstrated that this procedure may not be beneficial to the patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prophylactic placement of a drain in colorectal anastomosis can reduce postoperative complications. METHODS: We systematically searched all the electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared routine use of drainage to non-drainage regimes after colorectal anastomosis, using the terms "colorectal" or "colon/colonic" or "rectum/rectal" and "anastomo*" and "drain or drainage." Reference lists of relevant articles, conference proceedings, and ongoing trial databases were also screened. Primary outcome measures were clinical and radiological anastomotic leakage. Secondary outcome measures included mortality, wound infection, re-operation, and respiratory complications. We assessed the eligible studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Two authors independently extracted data. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs were included (1803 patients in total, 939 patients in the drain group and 864 patients in the no drain group). Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant differences between the drain group and the no drain group in (1) overall anastomotic leakage (relative risk (RR) = 1.14, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.80-1.62, P = 0.47), (2) clinical anastomotic leakage (RR = 1.39, 95 % CI 0.80-2.39, P = 0.24), (3) radiologic anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.56-1.51, P = 0.74), (4) mortality (RR = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.57-1.55, P = 0.81), (5) wound infection (RR = 1.19, 95 % CI 0.84-1.69, P = 0.34), (6) re-operation (RR = 1.18, 95 % CI 0.75-1.85, P = 0.47), and (7) respiratory complications (RR = 0.82, 95 % CI 0.55-1.23, P = 0.34). CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of prophylactic drainage in colorectal anastomosis does not benefit in decreasing postoperative complications.

Emergency resection versus bridge to surgery with stenting in patients with acute right-sided colonic obstruction: a systematic review focusing on mortality and morbidity rates.

PURPOSE: No consensus exists on the optimal treatment of acute malignant right-sided colonic obstruction (RSCO). This systematic review aims to compare procedure-related mortality and morbidity rates between primary resection and stent placement as a bridge to surgery followed by elective resection for patients with acute RSCO. METHODS: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched for all relevant literature. Primary endpoints were procedure-related mortality and morbidity. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the MINORS criteria. RESULTS: Fourteen cohort studies were eligible for analysis. A total of 2873 patients were included in the acute resection group and 155 patients in the stent group. Mean mortality rate for patients who underwent acute resection with primary anastomosis was 10.8% (8.1-18.5%). Overall mortality for patients initially treated with a colonic stent followed with elective resection was 0%. Major morbidity was 23.9% (9.3-35.6%) and 0.8% (0-4.8%), respectively. Both mortality and major morbidity were significantly different. In addition, stent placement shows lower rates of anastomotic leakages (0 vs 9.1%) and fewer permanent ileostomies (0 vs 1.0%). CONCLUSION: Primary resection for patients with acute RSCO seems to be associated with higher mortality and major morbidity rates than stent placement and elective resection. In addition, stent placement resulted in fewer anastomotic leakages and permanent ileostomies. However, as no high-level studies are available on the optimal treatment of RSCO and proximal stenting is considered technically challenging, future comparative studies are warranted for the development of an evidence-based clinical decision guideline.

Tracheo-bronchoplastic procedures for NSCLC: single-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess operative mortality, morbidity, and long-term results of the totality of sleeve resections performed at our institutions over the last eight years, including sleeve lobectomies (SL), carinoplasties with total lung sparing (CP) and sleeve pneumonectomies (SP). METHODS: A retrospective review of all the patients who underwent a tracheo-bronchial resection for bronchial cancer between 2004 and 2012 was undertaken. Bronchial sleeve resections and combined bronchial and vascular sleeve resections were described. RESULTS: The resulting group studied was 22 patients. SL and SP had a perioperative mortality rate of 7.1% and 28.5% respectively; morbidity rates were 21.4% for SL and 42.8% for SP. Global one-year and three-year survival was 75% and 63% respectively. One-year survival was 84% for SL and 53% for SP; three-year survival rate was 65% and 35% respectively (p=0.24). The absence of nodal metastatic involvement was associated with a better outcome with a three-year survival rate of 69% in the N0 group vs a 36% rate in the N+ group. CONCLUSIONS: Sleeve resection procedures achieved satisfactory local control of the tumour in our experience even in patients with preoperative contraindication to pneumonectomy, with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates.

[Damage of reconstructive operations in patients after urgent obstructive resection of colon].

It was performed comparative analysis of results of reconstructive operations in 116 patients with terminal colostomy after urgent obstructive resection of colon. Damage of reconstructive operations which differ by only access was estimated. Midline access was used in 49 patients, parastomal - in 51 cases. Laparoscopic operation was applied in 16 patients. The most traumatic method was middle laparotomy for restoration of colonic integrity. Laparoscopic operations and parastomal access are less invasive. Laparoscopic operations are accompanied by longer duration, greater blood loss and later restoration of intestinal motility pattern in comparison with surgery through parastomal access. It is associated with duration and damage of adhesiotomy stage.

Central shunt procedures for complex congenital heart diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The study was designed to analyze the results of central shunt procedure using Gore-Tex grafts for treatment of patients with complex congenital heart diseases. METHODS: A Gore-Tex graft was implanted using an end-to-side anastomosis technique connecting the aorta with the pulmonary artery. The graft size was determined based on the patients' body weight. Artery growth and percutaneous plasma oxygen were examined pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: The procedure was performed without cardiopulmonary bypass in 96 of 110 cases. Shunt sizes from 3.5 to 6.0 mm were employed. After operation, the oxygen saturations increased significantly from 65.2% ± 7.3 to 84.1% ± 3.8 (p < 0.05). Both left and right pulmonary arteries were found to grow significantly in size, from 4.9 ± 1.8 to 7.5 ± 2.0 mm and from 6.1 ± 2.3 to 8.0 ± 4.7 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). Early mortality was 5.5% (6/110). Major shunt-related complications included congestive heart failure (1.8%, 2/110) and acute shunt occlusion (1.8%, 2/110). Median follow-up was 18 months (range 6 to 61), with late mortality of 3.8% (4/104) one month postoperation. CONCLUSION: The central shunt increases oxygen saturation and improves pulmonary artery development effectively with a relatively low incidence of congestive heart failure, acute occlusion, and pulmonary distortion. The adequate postoperation survival, low morbidity and mortality, and less technical difficulty of this procedure make it a more desirable treatment for complex heart diseases.

American Society of Anesthesiologists class and Charlson's comorbidity index as predictors of postoperative colorectal anastomotic leak: a single-institution experience.

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) was adopted to assess patients' physical condition before surgery. Studies suggest that ASA score and CCI might be a prognostic criterion (indicator) for patient outcome. The aim of this study is to determine if ASA classification and CCI can determine the risk of anastomotic leaks (AL) in patients who underwent colorectal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 505 consecutive colorectal resections with primary anastomoses between 2008 and 2012 was performed at a university hospital. ASA score, CCI, surgical procedure, length of stay, age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-five patients had an ASA score of I and II, 227 patients had an ASA score of III, and 13 patients had an ASA score of IV. A total of 19 patients had an anastomotic leak (ASA I-II: 5 patients, 1.9%; ASA III: 12 patients, 5.58%; ASA IV: 2 patients, 18.18%). A higher ASA score was significantly associated with AL on further analysis (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.345-6.670, P = 0.007). When matched for age, BMI, and CCI on logistic regression analysis, increased ASA level was independently related to an increased likelihood of leak (OR(steroids) = 14.35, P < 0.01; OR(ASA_III v I-II) = 2.02, P = 0.18; OR(ASA_IVvI-II) = 8.45, P = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences in means between the leak and no-leak patients with respect to age (60.69 versus 65.43, P = 0.17), BMI (28.03 versus 28.96, P = 0.46), and CCI (6.19 versus 7.58, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: ASA score, but not CCI, is independently associated with anastomotic leak. Patients with a high ASA class should be closely followed postoperatively for AL after colorectal operations.

Comparative morbidity and mortality from cervical or thoracic esophageal anastomoses.

BACKGROUND: In the modern era of esophagectomy, we hypothesized that perioperative morbidity and mortality from cervical or thoracic sites of anastomoses would not be different. METHODS: We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients who underwent esophagectomy for lower esophageal or gastroesophageal (GE) junction malignancies from 2005 to 2010. Patients were categorized as having either a cervical or thoracic anastomosis based on CPT codes. RESULTS: There were 601 (66%) cervical and 308 (34%) thoracic anastomoses. Cervical anastomoses were associated with greater than 2 units of blood transfusion in a higher proportion of patients (10% vs. 3%, P = 0.001), and higher superficial surgical site infections (13% vs. 7%, P = 0.003). There were no difference in rates of organ/space infections (6% vs. 7%, P = 0.70), overall morbidity (38% vs. 39%, P = 0.84), or mortality (3% vs. 4%, P = 0.34). Median length of stay was similar (11.5 days cervical vs. 11 days thoracic, P = 0.89), even among patients with organ/space infections (18 days cervical vs. 21 days thoracic, P = 0.49). On multivariate analysis thoracic anastomosis was not a significant predictor of increased overall morbidity (OR 1.13: 95%CI 0.83-1.54). CONCLUSION: After esophagectomy, the site of anastomosis does not predict an increased risk of perioperative morbidity or mortality.

Subspecialist emergency management of diverticulitis is associated with reduced mortality and fewer stomas.

AIM: The aim of the study was to compare outcomes for emergency management of diverticulitis before and after the creation of a regional subspecialist colorectal unit. METHOD: We retrieved data on all emergency admissions for diverticulitis from the regional surgical audit database and compared results before (January 1998 to August 2002) and after (August 2002 to December 2008) establishment of the subspecialist colorectal surgery unit in August 2002. Additional data were retrieved from electronic patient records. The primary outcome measures were mortality and rate of primary anastomosis following resection. RESULTS: There were 879 patients before and 1280 patients after subspecialization. Nonoperative management was undertaken in approximately 80% of cases. Total mortality fell from 3.3 to 1.5% (P = 0.008), attributable to reduced operative mortality (9.6 to 4.2%; P = 0.019). The primary anastomosis rate for all left colon resections increased from 50.3 to 77.9%; P < 0.0001. Stoma formation of any type fell from 46.6 to 27.7%; P < 0001). CONCLUSION: Emergency management of diverticulitis by subspecialist colorectal surgeons is associated with low overall and operative mortality whilst safely achieving high rates of primary anastomosis.