Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
APMIS ; 132(7): 479-491, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38757248

RESUMO

The Melan-A (melanocyte antigen) protein, also termed 'melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1' (MART-1) is a protein with unknown function whose expression is specific for the melanocyte lineage. Antibodies against Melan-A are thus used for identifying melanocytic tumors, but some Melan-A antibodies show an additional - diagnostically useful - cross-reactivity against an unspecified protein involved in corticosteroid hormone synthesis. To comprehensively compare the staining patterns of a specific and a cross-reactive Melan-A antibody in normal and neoplastic tissues, tissue microarrays containing 15,840 samples from 133 different tumor types and subtypes as well as 608 samples of 76 different normal tissue types were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. For the Melan-A-specific antibody 'Melan-A specific' (MSVA-900M), Melan-A positivity was seen in 96.0% of 25 benign nevi, 93.0% of 40 primary and 86.7% of 75 metastatic melanomas, 82.4% of 85 renal angiomyolipomas as well as 96.4% of 84 neurofibromas, 2.2% of 46 granular cell tumors, 1.0% of 104 schwannomas, and 1.1% of 87 leiomyosarcomas. The cross-reactive antibody 'Melan-A+' (MSVA-901M+) stained 98.1% of the tumors stained by 'Melan-A specific'. In addition, high positivity rates were seen in sex-cord-stroma tumors of the ovary (35.3%-100%) and the testis (86.7%) as well as for adrenocortical neoplasms (76.3%-83.0%). Only nine further tumor groups showed Melan-A+ staining, including five different categories of urothelial carcinomas. Our data provide a comprehensive overview on the staining patterns of specific and cross-reactive Melan-A antibodies. The data demonstrate that both antibodies are highly useful for their specific purpose. It is important for pathologists to distinguish these two Melan-A antibody subtypes for their daily work.


Assuntos
Reações Cruzadas , Imuno-Histoquímica , Antígeno MART-1 , Neoplasias , Humanos , Reações Cruzadas/imunologia , Antígeno MART-1/imunologia , Antígeno MART-1/análise , Imuno-Histoquímica/métodos , Neoplasias/imunologia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/patologia , Melanoma/imunologia , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/patologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/imunologia , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Análise Serial de Tecidos , Feminino
2.
Oncol Res Treat ; 47(7-8): 351-359, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583422

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Naked DNA vaccination could be a powerful and safe strategy to mount antigen-specific cellular immunity. We designed a phase I clinical trial to investigate the toxicity of naked DNA vaccines encoding CD8+ T-cell epitope from tumor-associated antigen MART-1 in patients with advanced melanoma. METHODS: This dose escalating phase Ia clinical trial investigates the toxicity and immunological response upon naked DNA vaccines encoding a CD8+ T-cell epitope from the tumor-associated antigen MART-1, genetically linked to the gene encoding domain 1 of subunit-tetanus toxin fragment C in patients with advanced melanoma (inoperable stage IIIC-IV, AJCC 7th edition). The vaccine was administrated via intradermal application using a permanent make-up or tattoo device. Safety was monitored according to CTCAE v.3.0 and skin biopsies and blood samples were obtained for immunologic monitoring. RESULTS: Nine pretreated, HLA-A*0201-positive patients with advanced melanoma expressing MART-1 and MHC class I, with a good performance status, and adequate organ function, were included. With a median follow-up of 5.9 months, DNA vaccination was safe, without treatment-related deaths. Common treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were dermatologic reactions at the vaccination site (100%) and pain (56%). One patient experienced grade 4 toxicity, most likely related to tumor progression. One patient (11%) achieved stable disease, lasting 353 days. Immune analysis showed no increase in vaccine-induced T cell response in peripheral blood of 5 patients, but did show a MART-1 specific CD8+ T cell response at the tattoo administration site. The maximum dose administered was 2 mg due to lack of clinical activity. CONCLUSION: We showed that the developed DNA vaccine, applied using a novel intradermal application strategy, can be administered safely. Further research with improved vaccine formats is required to show possible clinical benefit of DNA vaccination.


Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer , Melanoma , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tatuagem , Vacinas de DNA , Humanos , Melanoma/imunologia , Melanoma/terapia , Vacinas de DNA/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de DNA/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Masculino , Vacinas Anticâncer/administração & dosagem , Vacinas Anticâncer/imunologia , Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intradérmicas , Idoso , Adulto , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Antígeno MART-1/imunologia , Linfócitos T CD8-Positivos/imunologia , Vacinação/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Antígeno HLA-A2/imunologia , Epitopos de Linfócito T/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA