Safety evaluation of 8 drug degradants present in over-the-counter cough and cold medications.

Although the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA) has provided guidance on the control of drug degradants for prescription drugs, there is less guidance on how to set degradant specifications for FDA OTC monograph drugs. Given that extensive impurity testing was not part of the safety paradigm in original OTC monographs, a weight of evidence (WOE) approach to qualify OTC degradants is proposed. This approach relies on in silico tools and read-across approaches alongside standard toxicity testing to determine safety. Using several drugs marketed under 21 CFR 341 as case studies, this research demonstrates the utility of a WOE approach across data-rich and data-poor degradants. Based on degradant levels ranging from 1 to 4% of the maximum daily doses of each case study drug and 10th percentile body weight data for each patient group, children were recognized as having the highest potential exposure relative to adults per body mass. Depending on data availability and relationship to the parent API, margins of safety (MOS) or exposure margins were calculated for each degradant. The findings supported safe use, and indicated that this contemporary WOE approach could be utilized to assess OTC degradants. This approach is valuable to establish specifications for degradants in OTCs.

Effectiveness of antitussives, anticholinergics, and honey versus usual care in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis: a multiarm randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the frequent use of symptomatic therapies in cough, evidence of their benefits is lacking. OBJECTIVE: We compared the effectiveness of 3 symptomatic therapies and usual care in acute bronchitis. METHODS: Multicenter, pragmatic, multiarm parallel group, open randomized trial in primary care (ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT03738917) was conducted in Catalonia. Patients ≥18 with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough<3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough (7-point Likert scale), were randomized to usual care, dextromethorphan 15 mg t.i.d., ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg 2 puffs t.i.d, or 30 mg of honey t.i.d., all taken for up to 14 days. The main outcome measure was the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. A symptom diary was given. A second visit was scheduled at days 2-3 for assessing evolution, with 2 more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance, and complications. RESULTS: We failed to achieve the sample size scheduled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We finally recruited 194 patients. The median number of days with moderate-to-severe cough (score ≥ 3) in the usual care arm was 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4, 8.75), 5 in the ipratropium bromide arm (IQR, 3, 8), 5 in the dextromethorphan arm (IQR, 4, 9.75), and 6 in the honey arm (IQR, 3.5, 7). The same results were obtained in the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for the median survival time of each arm with the usual care as the reference group. CONCLUSION: The symptomatic treatment evaluated has shown to be ineffective against cough.

Cough is the most frequent symptom reported by patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Despite being a defense mechanism, cough is unpleasant and negatively affects sleep and overall well-being. Accordingly, many patients with acute cough seek medical help to mitigate symptoms and reduce their duration despite the typically self-limiting nature of the condition. In this randomized clinical trial, we explored the benefit of 3 common symptomatic treatments recommended in some guidelines for relieving this symptom during the course of uncomplicated acute bronchitis, a cough suppressant, an inhaler, and honey intake. Although the total number of patients initially expected could not be achieved due to the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the results of our study demonstrate a lack of efficacy of these products as the number of days of severe-to-moderate cough was similar in the 3 arms and comparable to the group of patients allocated to usual care.

[Efficacy of compound pholcodine syrup and compound codeine phosphate oral solution on lung cancer-related cough].

Objective: To assess the clinical efficacy of compound pholcodine syrup and compound codeine phosphate oral solution on lung cancer-related cough. Methods: A total of 60 patients diagnosed with middle-advanced stage lung cancer and had lung cancer-related cough in the Department of Geriatric Oncology of Chongqing University Cancer Hospital from January to May 2022 were prospectively enrolled. According to the random number table method, the patients were divided into two groups: observation group and control group. The observation group [n=30, with 21 males and 9 females, and aged (62.3±10.4) years] received compound pholcodine syrup treatment, while the control group [n=30, with 21 males and 9 females, and aged (62.0±8.1) years] received compound codeine phosphate oral solution treatment. The dosage of the two drugs was 15 ml each time, 3 times a day, and the treatment course was 5 days. The antitussive effectiveness, cough severity and quality of life (Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin-Chinese scale) were observed and compared between the two groups 3 days and 5 days after the treatment. Results: All 60 patients completed the study. Both regimens were effective in controlling lung cancer-related cough. After 3 days treatment, the antitussive effective rate of the observation group and the control group was 83.3% (25/30) and 73.3% (22/30), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.347). Likewise, after 5 days treatment, the antitussive effective rate of observation group and control group was 90.0% (27/30) and 86.6% (26/30), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.687). There was no statistically significant difference in the cough severity between observation group [moderate and severe cough: 56.7% (17/30)] and control group [moderate and severe cough: 67.7% (20/30)] (P=0.414). After 3 days treatment, cough symptoms were relieved in both groups. Patients with mild cough accounted for 73.3% (22/30) in the observation group and 56.7% (17/30) in the control group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.331). Moreover, after 5 days treatment, there was also no significant difference in mild cough between observation group [86.7% (26/30)] and control group [66.7% (20/30)] (P=0.067). Meanwhile, there were no significant differences in the physiological score, psychological score, social score and total score of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin-Chinese scale before the treatment, after 3 days and 5 days treatment between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of both xerostomia and constipation in the observation group was 0, which was lower than those of the control group [20.0% (6/30) and 20.0% (6/30)] (both P<0.05). Conclusions: Both compound pholcodine syrup and compound codeine phosphate oral solution are effective in treating lung cancer-related cough with similar antitussive effectiveness. Compound pholcodine syrup has a lower incidence of xerostomia and constipation than control group, with a better safety profile.

ATP, an attractive target for the treatment of refractory chronic cough.

Chronic cough is the most common complaint in respiratory clinics. Most of them have identifiable causes and some may respond to common disease-modifying therapies. However, there are many patients whose cough lacks effective aetiologically targeted treatments or remains unexplained after thorough assessments, which have been described as refractory chronic cough. Current treatments for refractory chronic cough are limited and often accompanied by intolerable side effects such as sedation. In recent years, various in-depth researches into the pathogenesis of chronic cough have led to an explosion in the development of drugs for the treatment of refractory chronic cough. There has been considerable progress in the underlying mechanisms of chronic cough targeting ATP, and ongoing or completed clinical studies have confirmed the promising antitussive efficacy of P2X3 antagonists for refractory cough. Herein, we review the foundation on which ATP target was developed as potential antitussive medications and provide an update on current clinical progresses.

Effectiveness and Safety of Codeine and Levodropropizine in Patients With Chronic Cough.

BACKGROUND: Recent progress in chronic cough management includes controlling cough triggers and hypersensitivity using antitussives. Therefore, we investigated the effects and safety outcomes of antitussives, codeine and levodropropizine, in patients with chronic cough. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, randomized comparative trial with newly referred patients with chronic cough. Patients were orally administered codeine (60 mg/day) and levodropropizine (180 mg/day) for 2 weeks. Cough severity, including the visual analog scale (VAS), Cough Symptom Score (CSS), Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), and safety for each treatment were assessed. The primary outcome was VAS score changes before and after 2 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Among the 88 participants, 45 and 43 in the codeine and levodropropizine groups, respectively, were included in the analysis. Changes in the VAS score were higher in the codeine group than in the levodropropizine group (35.11 ± 20.74 vs. 19.77 ± 24.83, P = 0.002). Patients administered codeine also had improved CSS (2.96 ± 2.35 vs. 1.26 ± 1.89, P < 0.001) and LCQ (3.28 ± 3.36 vs. 1.61 ± 3.53, P = 0.025) than those administered levodropropizine. Treatment-related adverse events, including drowsiness, constipation, and headaches, were more frequent in the codeine group than in the levodropropizine group. However, no significant differences existed in the adverse events leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Codeine is an effective and generally well-tolerated antitussive for chronic cough. However, it may induce side effects in some patients. Individual responses and adverse events should be carefully monitored when codeine is used to treat chronic cough.

Abnormal white matter within brain structural networks is associated with high-impulse behaviour in codeine-containing cough syrup dependent users.

Codeine-containing cough syrup (CCS) is considered as one of the most popular drug of dependence among adolescents because of its inexpensiveness and easy availability. However, its relationship with neurobiological effects remains sparsely explored. Herein, we examined how high-impulse behaviours relate to changes in the brain structural networks. Forty codeine-containing cough syrup dependent (CCSD) users and age-, gender-, and number of cigarettes smoked per day -matched forty healthy control (HC) subjects underwent structural brain imaging via MRI. High-impulse behaviour was assessed using the 30-item self-rated Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), and structural networks were constructed using diffusion tensor imaging and AAL-90 template. Between-group topological metrics were compared using nonparametric permutations. Benjamin-Hochberg false discovery rate correction was used to correct for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05). The relationships between abnormal network metrics and clinical characteristics of CCS dependent (BIS-11 total score, CCS- dependent duration and mean dose) were examined by Spearman's correlation. Structural networks of the CCSD group demonstrated lower small-world properties than those of the HC group. Abnormal changes in nodal properties among CCSD users were located mainly in the frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and olfactory cortex. NBS analysis further indicated disrupted structural connections between the frontal gyrus and multiple brain regions. There were significant correlations between abnormal nodal properties of the frontal gyrus and clinical characteristics (BIS-11 total score, CCS dependent duration and mean dose) in the CCSD group. These findings suggest that the high-impulse behavioural expression in CCS addiction is associated with widespread brain regions, particularly within those in the frontal cortex. Aberrant brain regions and disrupted connectivity of structural network may be the bases of neuropathology for underlying symptoms of high-impulse behaviours in CCSD users, which may provide a novel sight to better treat and prevent codeine dependency in adolescents.

Should Codeine Still be Considered a WHO Essential Medicine?

Codeine continues to be widely used as an analgesic, antidiarrhoeal and antitussive agent. Its analgesic effect depends on its biotransformation to morphine, a strong opioid. The highly variable biotransformation of codeine to morphine, catalysed by CYP2D6, underlies the pronounced interindividual variability of its analgesic response. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that codeine administered alone has the poorest analgesic effect among all commonly used analgesics in acute postoperative pain. Moreover, it is highly unlikely that the low dose of codeine contributes to the pain-relieving effect of the non-opioid component in combination analgesic products. In addition, there is a lack of reliable clinical evidence to support the use of codeine as an antitussive in acute or chronic cough. Codeine use, through its active metabolite morphine, has the potential to lead to abuse and dependence. The World Health Organization (WHO) removed codeine from the essential medicines list for children in 2011. Based on the available information in the scientific literature on the efficacy and safety of codeine, the WHO should seriously consider removing it also from the list of essential medicines for adults, which would be a strong signal for all health professionals to prescribe and dispense codeine with the utmost caution.

Relationship Between Severe Respiratory Depression and Codeine-Containing Antitussives in Children: A Nested Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend against all codeine use in children for its common indications of analgesia and cough suppression because of uncertain benefits and potential risk of death. However, because of its rarity, the occurrence of severe respiratory depression associated with codeine-containing antitussives has been poorly investigated. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between codeine-containing antitussives and severe respiratory depression in children. METHODS: We retrospectively identified Japanese children who were prescribed antitussives for respiratory diseases from a large Japanese administrative claims database (JMDC, Tokyo, Japan). We collected data on baseline characteristics including age, sex, and comorbidity. Each case was matched with four controls with the same sex and age in the same year from the same type of medical institution. We then examined the association between codeine-containing antitussives and subsequent severe respiratory depression using multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of 164,047 children, 18,210 (11.1%) were prescribed codeine-containing antitussives. Of the children who took codeine-containing drugs, seven experienced severe respiratory depression. After adjusting for confounding factors, there was no significant difference in the proportion of severe respiratory depression between children with and without codeine-containing antitussives (odds ratio 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-2.78). CONCLUSION: Occurrence of respiratory depression was very rare, and the association of codeine with respiratory depression was insignificant, even in a large sample of children in Japan.

The effect of gefapixant, a P2X3 antagonist, on cough reflex sensitivity: a randomised placebo-controlled study.

We evaluated the effect of gefapixant on cough reflex sensitivity to evoked tussive challenge.In this phase 2, double-blind, two-period study, patients with chronic cough (CC) and healthy volunteers (HV) were randomised to single-dose gefapixant 100 mg or placebo in a crossover fashion. Sequential inhalational challenges with ATP, citric acid, capsaicin and distilled water were performed 1, 3 and 5 h after dosing. Mean concentrations evoking ≥2 coughs (C2) and ≥5 coughs (C5) post dose versus baseline were co-primary endpoints. Objective cough frequency (coughs·h-1) over 24 h and a cough severity visual analogue scale (VAS) were assessed in CC patients. Adverse events were monitored.24 CC patients and 12 HV were randomised (mean age 61 and 38 years, respectively). The cough challenge threshold increased for ATP by 4.7-fold (C2, p≤0.001) and 3.7-fold (C5, p=0.007) for gefapixant versus placebo in CC patients; in HV, C2 and C5 increased 2.4-fold (C2, p=0.113; C5, p=0.003). The distilled water C2 and C5 thresholds increased significantly (p<0.001) by a factor of 1.4 and 1.3, respectively, in CC patients. Gefapixant had no effect on capsaicin or citric acid challenge. Median cough frequency was reduced by 42% and the least squares mean cough severity VAS was 18.0 mm lower for gefapixant versus placebo in CC patients. Dysgeusia was the most frequent adverse event (75% of HV and 67% of CC patients).ATP-evoked cough was significantly inhibited by gefapixant 100 mg, demonstrating peripheral target engagement. Cough count and severity were reduced in CC patients. Distilled water may also evoke cough through a purinergic pathway.

Antitussive therapy: A role for levodropropizine.

Cough is a protective reflex that serves to clear the airways of excessive secretions and foreign matter and which sometimes becomes excessive, and troublesome to patients. Cough is one of the most common reasons why individuals seek medical attention. A range of drugs have been developed in the past with antitussive activity and different mechanisms of action, but there are still very few safe and effective treatments available. The poor tolerability of most available antitussives is closely related to their action on the central nervous system (CNS). An international group of experts specialized in cough met to discuss the need to identify an effective antitussive treatment with a good tolerability profile. The aim of this expert review is to increase the knowledge about the cough mechanism and the activity of levodropropizine, a peripherally acting antitussive drug.

Update on the clinical development of gefapixant, a P2X3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of refractory chronic cough.

Chronic cough, or cough lasting >8 weeks, is often associated with underlying medical conditions (ie, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, and upper-airway cough syndrome). In some patients with chronic cough, treatment of these underlying conditions does not resolve the cough (refractory chronic cough [RCC]), or none of these conditions are present (unexplained chronic cough [UCC]). Despite appropriate medical evaluation, patients with RCC or UCC frequently experience cough persisting for many years, as there are currently no targeted pharmacological approaches approved for the treatment of these conditions. However, the adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-gated P2X3 receptor, a key modulator of the activation of sensory neurons central to the cough reflex, has recently garnered attention as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of chronic cough. Gefapixant, a first-in-class, non-narcotic, selective antagonist of the P2X3 receptor, recently demonstrated efficacy and was generally well tolerated in phase 2 clinical trials in patients with RCC, validating the utility of targeting this receptor in patients with chronic cough. On the basis of these data, 2 global phase 3 trials, with combined anticipated enrolment exceeding 2000 patients and with treatment durations of up to 1 year, have been initiated. Together, these trials will further evaluate efficacy and safety of gefapixant in the control of cough in patients with RCC or UCC.

BLU-5937: A selective P2X3 antagonist with potent anti-tussive effect and no taste alteration.

BLU-5937 is a small molecule that was shown to be a potent, selective and non-competitive P2X3 homotrimeric receptor antagonist. P2X3 receptors are ATP ion-gated channels located on primary afferent neurons. ATP released from damaged or inflamed tissues in the airways acts on P2X3 receptors of primary afferent neurons, triggering depolarization and action potentials that are transmitted centrally and interpreted as urge to cough. There are strong preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the role of P2X3 receptors in hypersensitization of the cough reflex, leading to chronic cough. By inhibiting P2X3 receptors on the primary sensory neurons, BLU-5937 would inhibit the hypersensitization of the cough reflex and, hence, the exaggerated cough experienced in chronic cough patients. BLU-5937 is being developed for the treatment of unexplained, refractory chronic cough. The high potency and selectivity of BLU-5937 for P2X3 homotrimeric receptors was demonstrated in vitro by inhibiting αß-meATP-evoked P2X3 or P2X2/3 receptor activity in cloned human hP2X3 and hP2X2/3 channels expressed in mammalian cells. The IC50 of BLU-5937 for hP2X3 homotrimeric and hP2X2/3 heterotrimeric receptors was established at 25 nM and >24 µM, respectively. Furthermore, BLU-5937 (500 nM) was able to block αß-meATP-induced sensitization and firing activity of isolated primary nociceptors in rat dorsal root ganglions (DRGs), through P2X3 homotrimeric receptor antagonism. In a guinea pig cough model, BLU-5937 (0.3, 3 and 30 mg/kg, oral) significantly reduced, in a dose-dependent fashion, the histamine-induced enhancement in the number of citric acid-induced coughs. BLU-5937 (3 and 30 mg/kg, oral) was also shown to reduce significantly and dose-dependently the ATP-induced enhancement of citric acid-induced coughs in the guinea pig. These anti-tussive effects were obtained at a plasma concentration known to block P2X3 homotrimeric receptors, but at concentration 50-fold lower than that required to block P2X2/3 heterotrimeric receptors. These results indicate that the anti-tussive effect of BLU-5937 is primarily mediated through the inhibition of P2X3 homotrimeric receptors. In a rat behavioral taste model, BLU-5937 (10-20 mg/kg, IP) did not alter taste perception as compared to control animals. In the same experiment, N-00588 (10-20 mg/kg, IP), a weakly selective antagonist for P2X3 versus P2X2/3 receptors, had a significant inhibitory effect on taste perception. Pharmacokinetic analysis of drug plasma concentrations showed that BLU-5937 did not affect taste function at concentrations up to 30 times the IC50 for P2X3. These results suggest that N-00588 achieved systemic concentration that blocked P2X3 and P2X2/3 receptors expressed on gustatory nerve ending innervating taste buds. The lack of effect of BLU-5937, even at high doses, on taste perception may be attributed to its higher selectivity for the P2X3 versus P2X2/3 receptors on the taste buds. The safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of BLU-5937 was assessed in a battery of preclinical studies and have revealed that BLU-5937 exhibits excellent drug-like characteristics, including good oral bioavailability, low predicted clearance in human, no blood-brain barrier permeability and high safety margin versus human predicted efficacious exposure. BLU-5937 is currently in clinical phase I development stage. In conclusion, BLU-5937 was selected as a drug candidate for the treatment of chronic cough due to its high potency and selectivity for P2X3 homotrimeric receptors, strong anti-tussive effects, excellent tolerability and predicted pharmacokinetic properties in humans.

Chewable cough tablets with improved palatability: A comparative phase II clinical trial.

Cough is the common disease condition which affects patients of every age. Numerous OTC medications available in community pharmacies however no antiviral treatment and even antibiotics has been shown to be effective without pre-existing lung infection. The treatment approach of medicinal herbs has been recognized for many decades and even longer for the treatment and prevention of cough. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Mukalbion poly herbal chewable tablets for the treatment of cough with improved palatability against a marketed brand (Poly herbal). For the formulation development of test group, the herbs were supplied by the Procurement department of Herbion Pakistan Pvt. Ltd. Althea officinalis (roots), Hedera helix (leaves) and Sisymbrium irio (seeds) were used for the manufacturing of Mukalbion (poly herbal, test group) chewable tablet. The comparative control clinical trial was carried out during a time frame of 07 months with sample size of 70 patients as per epidemiological software for sample size and each group contained 35 (±5) patients. Chewable tablets were administered and evaluated for effectiveness after 15 days of treatment. The data were collected by the patients through clinical trial questionnaire. The validated quality of life questionnaire (LCQ) was also used for assessment. The results were analyzed by applying paired sample T test by using IBM SPSS version 20.00. The p value was <0.005 at 95% confidence interval for cough variables including cough bouts, viscosity of sputum, chest congestion, sore throat and shortness of breath. The LCQ cough scale score was higher in test group as compared to control group. The test group also showed well tolerated in term of palatability. None of the patient claimed any of the side effects and no compliance were observed against the marketed brand.

Detecting the diverted use of psychoactive drugs by adolescents and young adults: A pilot study.

PURPOSE: The increasing trend of diversion of nonprescription drugs (NPDs) by adolescents or young adults is worrying. We implemented this pilot study before a national investigation to identify requests for suspected recreational use of psychoactive drugs made by young subjects to community pharmacies. METHODS: Thirty-eight French community pharmacies were asked to complete questionnaire (with age, gender of subjects; name, form, quantity of drugs) for each suspect request formulated by subjects under 26. Besides, pharmacists were asked about the regulatory measures they thought useful to decrease this diverted use by young people. Nineteen pharmacies participated. The study covered from December 12, 2016 to January 23, 2017. RESULTS: Forty-one requests mentioning 51 drugs were reported. They concerned males (85%) aged 20 years old on average, including 6 minors. The most frequent age class was that comprised between 18 and 20 years old. Codeine-containing drugs (29 reports) and promethazine (17 reports), the main components of the popular cocktail "Purple drank," were the most requested, followed by dextromethorphan (3 reports). Fifteen drugs were requested in syrup form. One request concerned the prescription drug ketamine. Pharmacists suggested to schedule the concerned NPDs to prescription-only drugs and to increase the education of students as well as the public. CONCLUSIONS: Codeine and promethazine, the main components of the popular cocktail Purple drank, were the most requested. Suspect requests of psychoactive drugs made by adolescents or young adults in community pharmacies should be carefully surveyed and combined to the monitoring of falsified prescriptions.

Honey for acute cough in children.

BACKGROUND: Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. Cough can impact quality of life, cause anxiety, and affect sleep in children and their parents. Honey has been used to alleviate cough symptoms. This is an update of reviews previously published in 2014, 2012, and 2010. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of honey for acute cough in children in ambulatory settings. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL (2018, Issue 2), which includes the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, MEDLINE (2014 to 8 February 2018), Embase (2014 to 8 February 2018), CINAHL (2014 to 8 February 2018), EBSCO (2014 to 8 February 2018), Web of Science (2014 to 8 February 2018), and LILACS (2014 to 8 February 2018). We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) on 12 February 2018. The 2014 review included searches of AMED and CAB Abstracts, but these were not searched for this update due to lack of institutional access. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing honey alone, or in combination with antibiotics, versus no treatment, placebo, honey-based cough syrup, or other over-the-counter cough medications for children aged 12 months to 18 years for acute cough in ambulatory settings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS: We included six randomised controlled trials involving 899 children; we added three studies (331 children) in this update.We assessed two studies as at high risk of performance and detection bias; three studies as at unclear risk of attrition bias; and three studies as at unclear risk of other bias.Studies compared honey with dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, salbutamol, bromelin (an enzyme from the Bromeliaceae (pineapple) family), no treatment, and placebo. Five studies used 7-point Likert scales to measure symptomatic relief of cough; one used an unclear 5-point scale. In all studies, low score indicated better cough symptom relief.Using a 7-point Likert scale, honey probably reduces cough frequency better than no treatment or placebo (no treatment: mean difference (MD) -1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.48 to -0.62; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 154 children; moderate-certainty evidence; placebo: MD -1.62, 95% CI -3.02 to -0.22; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 402 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Honey may have a similar effect as dextromethorphan in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.07, 95% CI -1.07 to 0.94; I² = 87%; 2 studies; 149 children; low-certainty evidence). Honey may be better than diphenhydramine in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.57, 95% CI -0.90 to -0.24; 1 study; 80 children; low-certainty evidence).Giving honey for up to three days is probably more effective in relieving cough symptoms compared with placebo or salbutamol. Beyond three days honey probably had no advantage over salbutamol or placebo in reducing cough severity, bothersome cough, and impact of cough on sleep for parents and children (moderate-certainty evidence). With a 5-point cough scale, there was probably little or no difference between the effects of honey and bromelin mixed with honey in reducing cough frequency and severity.Adverse events included nervousness, insomnia, and hyperactivity, experienced by seven children (9.3%) treated with honey and two children (2.7%) treated with dextromethorphan (risk ratio (RR) 2.94, 95% Cl 0.74 to 11.71; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 149 children; low-certainty evidence). Three children (7.5%) in the diphenhydramine group experienced somnolence (RR 0.14, 95% Cl 0.01 to 2.68; 1 study; 80 children; low-certainty evidence). When honey was compared with placebo, 34 children (12%) in the honey group and 13 (11%) in the placebo group complained of gastrointestinal symptoms (RR 1.91, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.24; I² = 0%; 2 studies; 402 children; moderate-certainty evidence). Four children who received salbutamol had rashes compared to one child in the honey group (RR 0.19, 95% CI 0.02 to 1.63; 1 study; 100 children; moderate-certainty evidence). No adverse events were reported in the no-treatment group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Honey probably relieves cough symptoms to a greater extent than no treatment, diphenhydramine, and placebo, but may make little or no difference compared to dextromethorphan. Honey probably reduces cough duration better than placebo and salbutamol. There was no strong evidence for or against using honey. Most of the children received treatment for one night, which is a limitation to the results of this review. There was no difference in occurrence of adverse events between the honey and control arms.

Time-to-onset of cold and flu symptom relief: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study for a multi-symptom combination product.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate effects of a multisymptom tablet on cold and flu symptoms within 4 hours post-administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with cold and flu symptoms. Eligible participants with at least moderate common cold or flu symptoms and symptom onset ≤ 48 hours before screening were assigned to a single multiple-active-ingredient tablet (containing paracetamol, pseudoephedrine hydrochloride, dextromethorphan hydrobromide, and chlorpheniramine maleate) or placebo tablet. Participants rated severity of each symptom (sore throat, headache, extremity pain, nasal congestion, sneezing, runny nose, and cough) from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours post administration. The total symptom score (TSS) was calculated as the sum of the individual symptom scores (primary endpoint). Participants rated global response to treatment on a scale from 0 (ineffective) to 4 (excellent). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout. RESULTS: Of 53 participants randomized, 52 received active tablet (n = 25) or placebo tablet (n = 27). Change from baseline in TSS throughout the 4-hour post-administration period was similar between groups. An efficacy criterion of 30% decrease in TSS at assessment points was not met (range, -1.91 to 8.94%). There were also no significant differences between groups in mean symptom scores for individual symptoms or global response to treatment. Four non-serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In this exploratory pilot study, a multisymptom cold and flu tablet was well tolerated but did not differ from placebo tablet with regard to onset of action following a single dose.
.

Intrinsic brain network abnormalities in codeine-containing cough syrup-dependent male individuals revealed in resting-state fMRI.

PURPOSE: To identify codeine-containing cough syrups (CCS)-related modulations of intrinsic connectivity network (ICN) and to investigate whether these changes of ICN can be related to duration of CCS use and to impulsivity behavior in CCS-dependent individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in 41 CCS-dependent individuals and 34 healthy controls (HC) were scanned at 1.5T and analyzed using independent component analysis (ICA), in combination with a "dual-regression" technique to identify the group differences of three important resting-state networks, the default mode network (DMN), the executive control network (ECN), and the salience network (SN) between the CCS-dependent individuals and HC. RESULTS: Compared with the HC, CCS-dependent individuals had aberrant intrinsic connectivity within the DMN, ECN, and SN (P < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected). Furthermore, a longer duration of CCS use was associated with greater abnormalities in the intrinsic network functional connectivity (FC, P < 0.05, Bonferroni correction). Intrinsic network FC also correlated with higher impulsivity in CCS-dependent individuals (P < 0.05, AlphaSim corrected). CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed aberrant DMN, ECN, and SN connectivity patterns in CCS-dependent patients, which may provide new insight into how neuronal communication and information integration are disrupted among DMN, ECN, and SN key structures due to long duration of CCS use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:177-186.