RESUMO
Over 50% of patients with systemic LCH are not cured with front-line therapies, and data to guide salvage options are limited. We describe 58 patients with LCH who were treated with clofarabine. Clofarabine monotherapy was active against LCH in this cohort, including heavily pretreated patients with a systemic objective response rate of 92.6%, higher in children (93.8%) than adults (83.3%). BRAFV600E+ variant allele frequency in peripheral blood is correlated with clinical responses. Prospective multicentre trials are warranted to determine optimal dosing, long-term efficacy, late toxicities, relative cost and patient-reported outcomes of clofarabine compared to alternative LCH salvage therapy strategies.
Assuntos
Clofarabina , Histiocitose de Células de Langerhans , Humanos , Clofarabina/uso terapêutico , Clofarabina/administração & dosagem , Histiocitose de Células de Langerhans/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Adolescente , Criança , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Escolar , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Recidiva , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/genética , Lactente , Resultado do Tratamento , Terapia de Salvação , Nucleotídeos de Adenina/uso terapêutico , Nucleotídeos de Adenina/administração & dosagem , Nucleotídeos de Adenina/efeitos adversos , Arabinonucleosídeos/uso terapêutico , Arabinonucleosídeos/administração & dosagem , Arabinonucleosídeos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Clofarabine is used to treat acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, but evidence of its safety and effectiveness in Japanese patients is limited. We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of clofarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in real-world clinical practice in Japan. METHODS: An observational, multicenter, post-marketing, all-case surveillance was conducted for safety. Effectiveness analyses were conducted in patients aged ≤21 years and those treated with clofarabine monotherapy and combination therapy (clofarabine plus etoposide and cyclophosphamide). RESULTS: In the all-case survey, 260 of 264 registered patients were eligible for safety analysis. Among the 225 patients eligible for effectiveness analysis, 139 were aged ≤21 years. For monotherapy and combination therapy, 20/31 and 34/88 patients were eligible, respectively. In the all-case survey, the median age was 16.0 years, and 47.7% of patients were <15 years old. Adverse drug reaction incidence was 83.5% and the most common were hematologic toxicities. The best overall response rates in the population aged ≤21 years were complete remission, 29.7%; complete remission without platelet recovery, 7.3% and partial remission, 10.9%. The rest (52.2%) were classified as ineffective. The sum of complete remission, complete remission without platelet recovery and partial remission rates (effectiveness rate) was 47.8% (66/138 patients). The effectiveness rates in the monotherapy and combination therapy surveys were 10.0% (2/20 patients) and 58.8% (20/34 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These post-marketing surveys provide real-world evidence of the safety and effectiveness of clofarabine regimens, including monotherapy and combination therapy in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The safety and effectiveness profiles were comparable with those of previous prospective studies.