Static Versus Articulating Spacer: Does Infectious Pathogen Type Affect Treatment Success?

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a static or an articulating antibiotic-containing spacer is a common strategy for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), yet many patients have persistent infections after spacer treatment. Although previous studies have compared the efficacy of a static and articulating spacer for treating PJI, few studies have assessed infection control from the time of spacer implantation, or they defined treatment failure as including reinfection, reoperation, or chronic suppressive therapy. Additionally, few studies have examined whether there is an interaction between spacer and pathogen type with respect to treatment success. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is there a difference in failure-free survival (defined as no reoperation, reinfection, or suppressive antibiotic therapy) between static and articulating spacers after spacer implantation for PJI? (2) Did the relationship between spacer type and failure-free survival differ by pathogen type (staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal and difficult-to-treat [including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus , Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Enterococcus spp , and other gram-negative bacterium] versus not-difficult-to-treat organisms)? METHODS: Between January 2014 and January 2022, a convenience sample of 277 patients was identified as having knee PJIs treated with an articulating (75% [208 of 277]) or static (25% [69 of 277]) antibiotic spacer and potentially eligible for this study. During that time, providers at our institution generally used spacers for later-presenting or chronic infections. Spacer choice was determined by surgeon preference, with static spacers used more often in instances of higher bone loss and poor soft tissue coverage. Thirty-one patients (8 static and 23 articulating spacers) were considered lost to follow-up or had incomplete datasets and were excluded from the analysis, resulting in a final analysis cohort of 246 patients: 25% (61 of 246) received a static spacer and 75% (185 of 246) received an articulating spacer. The mean ± standard deviation age of patients was 66 ± 9.9 years, BMI was 33.3 ± 6.9 kg/m 2 , and Elixhauser score was 18.1 ± 16.9. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between the two groups. Pathogen type was collected and categorized as staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal , and difficult-to-treat (including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , methicillin-susceptible S. aureus , Corynebacterium, Mycobacterium, Enterococcus spp , and other gram-negative bacterium) versus not-difficult-to-treat, as defined by an infectious disease physician. Other variables we collected included sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, BMI, and Elixhauser score. The primary outcome of interest was failure-free survival, which was a composite time-to-event outcome, with failure defined as reoperation, reinfection, death owing to infection, or chronic antibiotic use at a minimum of 1 year after the completion of the patient's Stage 1 postoperative antibiotic course, whichever came first. Reinfection was determined by the treating physicians in accordance with the Musculoskeletal Infection Society guidelines and included an evaluation of infectious laboratory values, cultures, and clinical signs of infection. We compared static and articulating spacers using a Cox proportional hazards model, with spacer type as the primary predictor variable. We compared staphylococcal versus nonstaphylococcal and difficult-to-treat versus not-difficult-to-treat infections by running additional models with interaction terms between spacer type and pathogen type. RESULTS: No difference was observed in the cause-specific hazard ratio for static versus articulating (reference) spacers (HR 1.45 [95% confidence interval 0.94 to 2.22]; p = 0.09), after adjusting for covariates. Additionally, no difference in the association between spacer type and failure-free survival was found between pathogen types or treatment difficulty after evaluating interactions (staphylococcal HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.15 to 0.91], nonstaphylococcal HR 0.79 [95% CI 0.49 to 1.28]; p value for interaction = 0.14; difficult-to-treat HR 0.37 [95% CI 0.14 to 0.99], not-difficult-to-treat HR 0.75 [95% CI 0.47 to 1.20]; p value for interaction = 0.20). CONCLUSION: The lack of a difference in failure-free survival and insufficient evidence of a difference in the association between spacer type and treatment failure by pathogen type suggests that infectious organism may not be an important consideration in the decision about spacer treatment type. Further studies should aim to elucidate which patient factors are the most influential in surgeon decision-making when choosing a spacer type in patients with PJI of the knee.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Comparison of the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial components: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: An optimized fit of the tibial component to the resection platform and correct rotational alignment are critical for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there remains controversy regarding the superiority of symmetric tibial component versus asymmetric tibial component. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the current evidence for comparing the coverage and rotation of asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial component. METHODS: We searched potentially relevant studies form PubMed, Web of science, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), up to 1 March 2023. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. RESULTS: Sixteen articles were identified. Compared to symmetric tibial component, asymmetric tibial component increased the coverage of the proximal tibial cut surface (MD, -2.87; 95%CI, -3.45 to -2.28; P < 0.00001), improved the prevalence of tibial baseplate underhang (OR, 0.16; 95%CI, 0.07 to 0.33; P < 0.00001) and malrotation (OR, 0.13; 95%CI, 0.02 to 0.90; P = 0.04), and reduced the degree of tibial component rotation (MD, -3.11; 95%CI, -5.76 to -0.47; P = 0.02). But there was no statistical significance for improving tibial baseplate overhang (OR, 0.58; 95%CI, 0.08 to 3.97; P = 0.58). Additionally, no revision had occurred for the two tibial components in the included studies. CONCLUSION: The current evidence shows asymmetric tibial component offer advantages in terms of coverage and rotation compared with symmetric tibial component in TKA.

Isolated aseptic loosening in total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive 10-year review of partial vs. total component revisions.

BACKGROUND: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), isolated aseptic loosening (IAL) requires the replacement of prosthetic components, with ongoing debate regarding the effectiveness of partial component revision (PCR) compared to total component revision (TCR). This study aims to compare implant survival and surgical outcomes between PCR and TCR in the context of IAL. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed data from 285 patients who underwent revision TKA for IAL between January 2000 and December 2013. After applying exclusion criteria, 112 patients were included in the analysis-60 undergoing TCR and 52 undergoing PCR. RESULTS: PCR was associated with shorter operative times and hospital stays compared to TCR, alongside significant differences in the choice of revision prostheses. Although the prosthesis failure rates were comparable between the groups (13.6% for TCR and 18.33% for PCR), significant risk factors for failure were identified, including a canal filling ratio (CFR) below 0.8 and a discrepancy over 0.2 between CFR views. However, no significant differences in overall survivorship were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both PCR and TCR provide similar survival rates and clinical outcomes for managing IAL in TKA. PCR provides advantages in terms of surgical efficiency and patient recovery, while reducing the need for more constrained prosthetic solutions. The study identifies CFR as a critical predictor of prosthesis failure, highlighting the importance of detailed preoperative planning and implant selection. These findings contribute valuable insights for improving revision strategies in IAL, enhancing surgical outcomes in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Assessment of preoperative planning and intraoperative accuracy of the AIKNEE system for total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of the AIKNEE system in preoperative planning and intraoperative alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: A total of 64 patients were planned preoperatively by the AIKNEE system, including the measurement of mechanical femorotibial angle (mFTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) using three-dimensional reconstructed images. Intraoperatively, the actual prosthesis size and alignment were compared to the planned parameters. Postoperative outcomes, including pain levels, range of motion (ROM), and Knee Scoring System (KSS) scores, were assessed after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the correlation between alignment deviations and postoperative function. RESULTS: The AIKNEE system accurately predicted the prosthesis size in thirty-one of femoral cases (48%) and forty-seven of tibial cases (73%). Deviations of mFTA, LDFA, and MPTA from the target value were within 3° in 88%, 92%, and 95% of cases, respectively. A significant improvement was observed in postoperative pain, ROM, and KSS scores (p < 0.001). Correlation analysis revealed that greater deviations in mFTA and LDFA were associated with increased pain (p = 0.004, 0.047) and lower KSS scores (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The AIKNEE system demonstrated promising results in predicting prosthesis size and achieved alignment within the desired range in a majority of cases. Postoperative outcomes, including pain levels and functional improvement, were favorable.

Effect of body mass index on 30-day complication rate and implant survival rate after simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicentre retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The practice of simultaneous bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (SBUKA) remains a topic of debate, particularly in patients with obesity. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the impact of body mass index (BMI) on the 30-day complication rate and the survival rate of the implant following SBUKA. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the clinical records of 245 patients (490 knees) who underwent SBUKA at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University and the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2010 and December 2020. Patients were categorised based on their BMI at the time of surgery into four groups: normal weight (BMI 18.5 to 22.9 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 23.0 to 24.9 kg/m2), obese (BMI 25.0 to 29.9 kg/m2), and severely obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Variables such as length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, and costs of hospitalisation were compared across all groups. Additionally, we recorded the 30-day postoperative complication rate and the time from surgery to any required revision. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was employed to evaluate and compare the implant survival rates. RESULTS: The follow-up period for the 245 patients ranged from 39 to 114 months, with an average of 77.05±18.71 months. The incidence of complications within 30 days post-surgery did not significantly differ across the groups (χ2 = 1.102, p = 0.777). The implant survival rates from the lowest to the highest BMI groups were 97.14%, 93.9%, 94.44%, and 96.43%, respectively. Both the rate of implant revision (χ2 =1.612, p = 0.657) and the survival curves of the implants (p = 0.639) showed no statistically significant differences among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: BMI did not influence the 30-day complication rate nor the survival rate of implants following SBUKA, suggesting that SBUKA should not be contraindicated based on BMI alone.

Central cone design demonstrates greater micromotion compared to keel design in cementless tibial baseplates: A biomechanical analysis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare micromotion of two new cementless tibial baseplates to a cementless design with well-published clinical success. METHODS: Three cementless tibial baseplate designs (fixed-bearing [FB] with keel and cruciform pegs, rotating-platform with porous central cone and pegs, FB with cruciform keel and scalloped pegs) were evaluated on sawbone models. Loading was applied to the baseplate at a rate of 1 Hz for 10,000 cycles, which represents 6-8 weeks of stair descent. This time frame also represents the approximate time length for the induction of biologic fixation of cementless implants. Compressive and shear micromotion at the sawbone-implant interface were measured. RESULTS: At the end of the loading protocol, the central cone rotating-platform design exhibited greater micromotion at the anterior (p < 0.001), posterior (p < 0.001) and medial locations (p = 0.049) compared to the other two implants. The central cone design also exhibited greater translational micromotion in the sagittal plane at the medial (p = 0.001) and lateral locations (p = 0.034) and in the coronal plane anteriorly (p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The cementless central cone rotating-platform baseplate demonstrated greater vertical and translational micromotion compared to the two FB baseplates with a keel underloading. This may indicate lower initial mechanical stability in implants without a keel, which possibly affects osseointegration. The implication of this is yet unknown and requires further long-term clinical follow-up to correlate these laboratory findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V (biomechanical study).

Knee kinematics are not different between asymmetrical and symmetrical tibial baseplates in total knee arthroplasty: A fluoroscopic analysis of step-up and lunge motions.

PURPOSE: This clinical fluoroscopy study investigated knee kinematics of two different cemented fixed-bearing, posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs: an asymmetric tibial component including an asymmetric insert designed to optimise personalised balance and fit and its precursor symmetrical design with symmetric insert. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients (16 TKAs from each treatment group) participating in a randomised controlled trial comparing TKA migration was included. The exclusion criterion was the use of walking aids. Flat-panel fluoroscopic recordings of step-up and lunge motions were acquired 1-year postoperatively. Medial and lateral contact points (CPs) were determined to calculate CP displacement, femoral axial rotation and pivot position. Using linear mixed-effects modelling techniques, kinematics between TKA designs were compared. RESULTS: During knee extension between 20° flexion and full extension, the CPs moved anteriorly combined with a small internal femoral rotation (a screw-home mechanism). Whereas CP movement was reversed: femoral rollback, external femoral rotation while flexing the knee between full extension and 20° knee flexion, At larger flexion angles, femoral axial rotation (FAR) occurred around a lateral pivot point both during step-up and lunge. The symmetric design had a 2.3° larger range of FAR compared to the asymmetric design during lunge (p = 0.02). All other kinematics were comparable. CONCLUSION: Despite the differences in design, this study showed that the asymmetric and symmetric PS TKA designs had mostly comparable knee kinematics during step-up and lunge motions. It is therefore expected that the functionality of the successor TKA design is similar to that of its precursor design. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with the use of thinner polyethylene liners compared to navigation-guided and manual techniques.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of intraoperative technology use on the rate of using polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater during primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: There were 103,295 implants from 16,386 primary unilateral TKAs performed on 14,253 patients at a single institution between 1 January 2018, and 30 June 2022, included in the current study. Robotic assistance and navigation guidance were used in 1274 (8%) and 8345 (51%) procedures, respectively. The remaining 6767 TKAs (41%) were performed manually. Polyethylene liners were manually identified and further subcategorised by implant thickness. Patients who underwent robotic-assisted TKA were younger (p < 0.001) and more likely to be male (p < 0.001) compared to patients who underwent navigation-guided or manual TKAs. RESULTS: Average polyethylene liner thickness was similar between groups (10.5 ± 1.5 mm for robotic-assisted TKAs, 10.9 ± 1.8 mm for navigation-guided TKAs and 10.8 ± 1.8 mm for manual TKAs). The proportions of polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater used were 4.9%, 3.8% and 1.9% for navigation-guided, manual and robotic-assisted procedures, respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate regression analyses demonstrated that navigation-guided (odds ratio [OR]: 2.6, 95% confidence Interval [CI]: [1.75-4.07], p < 0.001) and manual (OR: 2.0, 95% CI: [1.34-3.20], p = 0.001) procedures were associated with an increased use of polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted TKA was associated with a lower proportion of polyethylene liners 15 mm or greater used compared to navigation-guided and manual TKA. These findings suggest that robotic assistance can reduce human error via a more precise cutting system, limit over-resection of the tibia and flexion-extension gap mismatch and ultimately allow for more appropriately sized implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Mobile medial pivot (lateral slide)-type total knee arthroplasty exhibited different motion patterns between under anaesthesia and weight-bearing condition.

PURPOSE: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which has medial pivot and mobile-bearing mechanisms, has been developed and clinically used. However, the in vivo dynamic kinematics of the mobile medial pivot-type TKA (MMPTKA) is unclear. This study analysed the in vivo kinematics of MMPTKA in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing conditions. METHODS: The study included 10 knees that underwent primary TKA using MMPTKA. After TKA, lateral view radiographs of the knee in full extension, 90° of flexion and passive full flexion were taken under general anaesthesia in the nonweight-bearing condition. At least 6 months postoperatively, knee motion during squatting from a weight-bearing standing position was observed using a flat-panel detector and analysed using the three-dimensional-to-two-dimensional image registration technique. RESULTS: Under anaesthesia: in passive full flexion, the anteroposterior (AP) locations of the femoral component's medial and lateral distal points were 10.2 and 16.0 mm posterior, and the rotational angles of the femoral component's X-axis (FCX) and insert were 8.1° external rotation and 18.5° internal rotation to full extension, respectively. Squatting: the AP translations of the femoral component's medial and lateral most distal points were 2.2 and 6.4 mm, and the rotational angles of the FCX and insert were 5.7° and 1.6° external rotation, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the AP translation of the femoral component's medial and lateral most distal points and changes in the insert's rotational angle when comparing under anaesthesia and squatting. CONCLUSIONS: The kinematics of the insert in MMPTKA was significantly influenced by loading and muscle contraction. The femoral component exhibited substantial external rotation and posterior translation under anaesthesia, which may contribute to achieving an optimal range of motion. The insert remained relatively stable during squatting and minimal rotation was observed, indicating good stability. MMPTKA was expected to demonstrate rational kinematics by incorporating mobile and medial pivot mechanisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective biomechanical case series study.

Small deviations between planned and performed bone cuts using a CT-based robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty system.

PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT)-based robotic system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has shown improved accuracy compared to conventional. This study was designed to (1) confirm the accuracy of the robotic system in achieving the plan and (2) establish the alignment and positioning deviation between final components and planning, by measuring the discrepancy between final implant alignment and the corresponding planned cut. METHODS: Ninety-six cementless robotic-arm assisted (RA) TKAs were assessed. Bone resections were performed using the haptically controlled robotic arm. Alignment in the coronal and sagittal plane and resection depth of the distal femoral and proximal tibial cuts were recorded with a navigation planar probe. After final components were impacted, the probe was positioned on each implant surface to determine its alignment and positioning. RESULTS: The mean tibial resections and implanted tibial component's positioning were 0.4 mm (standard deviation, SD: 0.6) and 0.9 mm (SD: 0.8), respectively, higher than planned (p < 0.01). The tibial sagittal cut had 19/96 cases (19.8%) of ±1° outliers from plan. In 40/96 cases (41.7%), the tibial component was more prominent than planned of more than 1 mm. The mean femoral resections and impacted femoral component's positioning was 0.1 mm (SD: 0.8) and 0.2 mm (SD: 0.7), respectively, higher than planned. In 23/96 cases (24.0%), the femoral sagittal cut and femoral component coronal alignment deviated more than ±1° from plan. CONCLUSIONS: The computed tomography-based robotic-assisted TKA system showed good accuracy regarding bone preparation and component's positioning relative to the planning. Cementless tibial component impaction resulted in the most deviation from plan, with a large proportion of cases resulting in being more prominent than planned. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Enhancing robotic precision in medial UKA: Image-based robot-assisted system had higher accuracy in implant positioning than imageless robot-assisted system across 292 knees.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to compare the degree of accuracy in implant positioning and limb alignment offered by two robot-assisted (RA) systems: an image-based robot-assisted (IBRA) versus an imageless robot-assisted (ILRA) system for the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS: This retrospective radiographic study included medial UKAs performed between 2011 and 2023. Radiographic measurements taken preoperatively and at 1-year postoperative control visit focusing on hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), tibial component coronal alignment relative to Cartier's angle and restoration of proper joint line (JL) height were analyzed. Outliers for postoperative measurements were defined as follows: HKA <175° or >180°, PTS <2° or >8°, >3° or <-3° alterations in Cartier's angle and ±2 mm changes in the height of the joint line. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 292 medial UKAs: 95 (32.5%) with an IBRA system and 197 (67.5%) with an ILRA system. Implant positioning and limb alignment were more accurate in the group of patients treated with IBRA, HKA (77.9% vs. 67.5%, p = 0.07), PTS (93.7% vs. 82.7%, p = 0.01), restoration of tibial varus relative to Cartier's angle (87.4% vs. 65%, p < 0.001) and restoration of JL height (81.1% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Medial UKA surgery using an IBRA system was associated with a higher degree of accuracy in implant positioning and postoperative limb alignment as compared to an ILRA system. This is a valuable contribution to help communicate the advantages of using this surgical technique and improve its reproducibility. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

A new gap balancing technique with functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty using the MAKO robotic arm system: a preliminary study.

BACKGROUND: Gap tension is an important factor influencing the clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Traditional mechanical alignment (MA) places importance on neutral alignment and often requires additional soft tissue releases, which may be related to patient dissatisfaction. Conversely, the functional alignment requires less soft tissue release to achieve gap balance. Conventional gap tension instruments present several shortcomings in practice. The aim of this study is to introduce a new gap balancing technique with FA using the modified spacer-based gap tool and the MAKO robotic arm system. METHODS: A total of 22 consecutive patients underwent primary TKA using the MAKO robotic arm system. The gap tension was assessed and adjusted with the modified spacer-based gap tool during the operation. Patient satisfaction was evaluated post-operatively with a 5-point Likert scale. Clinical outcomes including lower limb alignment, Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were recorded before surgery, 3 months and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: The range of motion (ROM) was significantly increased (p < 0.001) and no patients presented flexion contracture after the surgery. KSS and WOMAC score were significantly improved at 3 months and 1 year follow-up (p < 0.001 for all). During the surgery, the adjusted tibial cut showed more varus than planned and the adjusted femoral cut presented more external rotation than planned (p < 0.05 for both). The final hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was also more varus than planned (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This kind of spacer-based gap balancing technique accompanied with the MAKO robotic arm system could promise controlled lower limb alignment and improved functional outcomes after TKA.

Wearing a Surgical Vest With a Sterile Surgical Helmet System Decreases Contamination of the Surgical Field.

BACKGROUND: Sterile surgical helmet systems are frequently utilized in total knee arthroplasty procedures to protect the surgeon while maintaining a comfortable working environment. However, common helmet systems pressurize the space between the surgical gown and the surgeon's skin. In gowns with a back seam, this may allow contaminated skin particles to escape into the surgical field. By measuring bacterial colony-forming units (CFUs), this study sought to determine if occlusion of the open back seam reduced the risk of potential contamination. METHODS: First, qualitative analysis depicting airflow variations between gown configurations was performed using the Schlieren Spherical Mirror imaging system. Each gown configuration consisted of a sterile surgical helmet and one of 3 gown configurations: a standard gown with rear-tied closure, a standard gown with a surgical vest, and a zippered Toga-style gown. Next, a surgeon then performed simulated surgical activities for 60 minutes within a 1.4 m3 isolation chamber with work surfaces and controllable filtered air exchanges. During each procedure, contaminated particles were collected on sets of agar settle plates positioned directly behind the surgeon. Upon completion, the agar plates were incubated in a biolab, and the number of bacterial and fungal CFUs was counted. The experimental procedure was repeated 12 times for each gown configuration, with sterilization of the chamber between runs. Contamination rates were expressed as CFUs/m2/h. RESULTS: The mean contamination rate measured with the standard gown was 331.7 ± 52.0 CFU/m2/h. After the addition of a surgical vest, this rate decreased by 45% to 182.2 ± 30.8 CFU/m2/h (P = .02). Similarly, with the Toga-style gown, contamination rates dropped by 49% to 170.5 ± 41.9 CFU/m2/h (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: When used in conjunction with surgical helmet systems, conventional surgical gowns do not prevent potential contamination of the surgical field. We recommend that staff within the surgical field cover the back seam of standard gowns with a vest or don a zippered Toga-style gown.

Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty in 2023.

Over the past few decades, instrumentation and techniques for total knee arthroplasty have evolved from conventional manual tools to a wide range of technologies, including calibrated guides for accurate bone cuts and alignment, smart tools, dynamic intraoperative sensors for soft tissue balancing, patient-specific guides, computer navigation, and robotics. This review is intended to provide an overview of the latest advancements in total knee arthroplasty technology, address potential challenges and solutions related to the application of these technologies, and explore their limitations.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Resurgence-Who, When, Where, and How?

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics, but there is still debate over the optimal fixation method for long-term durability: cement versus cementless bone ingrowth. Recent improvements in implant materials and technology have offered the possibility of cementless TKA to change clinical practice with durable, stable biological fixation of the implants, improved operative efficiency, and optimal long-term results, particularly in younger and more active patients. METHODS: This symposium evaluated the history of cementless TKA, the recent resurgence, and appropriate patient selection, as well as the historical and modern-generation outcomes of each implant (tibia, femur, and patella). Additionally, surgical technique pearls to assist in reliable, reproducible outcomes were detailed. RESULTS: Historically, cemented fixation has been the gold standard for TKA. However, cementless fixation is increasing in prevalence in the United States and globally, with equivalent or improved results demonstrated in appropriately selected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cementless TKA provides durable biologic fixation and successful long-term results with improved operating room efficiency. Cementless TKA may be broadly utilized in appropriately selected patients, with intraoperative care taken to perform meticulous bone cuts to promote appropriate bony contact and biologic fixation.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Range of Motion Following Knee Arthroplasty Using a Megaprosthesis in Non-Oncological Patients: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: This review aimed to determine outcomes following megaprostheses in non-oncological indications for knee arthroplasty, including range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcome measures of function, pain, and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane via Ovid and PubMed between January 2003 and June 2023 was conducted. Studies reporting function, pain, ROM, and/or QoL in non-oncological patients who have received knee megaprostheses were included. Studies with sample sizes (n ≤ 5) were excluded. The risk of bias was assessed using the Downs and Black Quality Checklist for Health Care Intervention Studies. Central tendency measures (mean or median) were reported at each time point, and dispersion measures were extracted and reported whenever data were available. RESULTS: A total of 30 studies (involving 1,294 megaprostheses) were included. Of which, 14 of 30 studies reviewed patients who had mixed indications; 14 of 30 looked at fracture only; 1 of 30 focused on distal femur nonunion; and 1 of 30 focused on patients who had periprosthetic infections. The average patient follow-up time was 40.1 months (range, 1.0 to 93.5). Most studies presented a high risk of bias (27 of 30), while a few (3 of 30) presented a low risk of bias. Improvements from preoperative baseline were observed in 85.7% of studies that reported baseline and follow-up data for function (12 of 14), 100.0% pain (4 of 4), 90.9% ROM (10 of 11), and 66.6% QoL (2 of 3). CONCLUSIONS: Favorable function, pain, ROM, and QoL outcomes following knee megaprostheses in non-oncological patients were observed. Heterogeneity in outcome measures and follow-up periods prevented the pooling of data. Future comparative studies are warranted to enhance the body of evidence relating to knee megaprostheses in non-oncological patients.

Ultracongruent Polyethylene Liners Do Not Affect Survival of Total Knee Arthroplasty for Valgus Deformity.

BACKGROUND: Valgus knee deformity is observed in nearly 10% of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The degree of polyethylene constraint required to balance a valgus knee remains controversial, and historically, posterior-stabilized (PS) designs have been favored. This study evaluated the survivorship of TKA done in valgus knees based on implant design and specifically compared posterior-stabilized (PS) and ultracongruent (UC) liners. METHODS: A total of 549 primary TKAs performed on valgus knees by fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, degrees of preoperative deformity, implants used, and all-cause revisions until final follow-up were recorded. Cox regression analyses evaluated survival to all-cause revision in each cohort. The mean follow-up was 4.9 years (range, 2 to 9). RESULTS: There were 403 UC liners compared to 146 PS liners. There was no difference in patient age (68 versus 67 years; P = .30), body mass index (30.9 versus 30.4; P = .36), or degree of deformity (8.6 versus 8.8 degrees; P = .75) between the cohorts. At final follow-up, there were 5 revisions in the PS cohort (3.4%) versus 11 revisions in the UC cohort (2.7%) (P = .90). The most common reason for revision in both cohorts was periprosthetic joint infection (4 PS; 8 UC). Multivariable regression analyses controlling for age, body mass index, Elixhauser comorbidity score, sex, and degree of deformity demonstrated UC polyethylene liners were not associated with revision (hazard ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26 to 2.21; P = .62). There was no difference in eight-year survivorship to all-cause revision, including aseptic and septic failure. CONCLUSIONS: Alternative polyethylene liners from the historically utilized PS liners for TKA for valgus deformity did not reduce survivorship. With modern polyethylene designs, UC inserts can be utilized for this deformity without increasing the risk of failure.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With an Imageless, Second-Generation Robotic System.

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is increasingly used in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), with imageless systems recently receiving Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval. However, there remains a paucity of literature on the use of robotic assistance in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This paper describes the imageless surgical technique for robotic revision TKA using a second-generation robotic system and details both intraoperative and 90-day outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of 115 robotic revision TKAs from March 2021 to May 2023 at 3 tertiary academic centers. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical data, and 90-day outcomes were collected. Pain and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores preoperatively and postoperatively were recorded. All-cause reoperations at the final follow-up were detailed. The mean patient age was 65 years (range, 43 to 88), and 58% were women. The mean follow-up time was 13 months (range, 3 to 51). RESULTS: The most common indications for rTKA were instability (n = 37, 32%) and aseptic loosening (n = 42, 37%). There were 83 rTKAs to a posterior-stabilized liner, 22 to a varus-valgus constrained liner, and 5 to a hinged construct. The median polyethylene size was 11 (interquartile range, 10 to 13), and 93% of patients had their joint line restored within 5 millimeters of the native contralateral knee. Within the 90-day postoperative window, there were 8 emergency department visits and 2 readmissions. At the final follow-up, there were 5 reoperations and 2 manipulations under anesthesia. There were 4 patients who required irrigation and debridement after superficial wound dehiscence, and one had an arthrotomy disruption after a fall. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates favorable intraoperative and 90-day outcomes and suggests that imageless robotic surgery is a promising modality in rTKA. Further studies comparing the longitudinal outcomes after robotic and conventional rTKA are warranted.

Outcomes of Metaphyseal Cones and Stem Fixation Following Rotating Hinge in Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Although hinged prostheses have been used successfully in complex revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), concerns exist regarding early failure due to aseptic loosening and other mechanical complications. The use of metaphyseal cones and hybrid cement fixation have been studied in unlinked constrained primary or revision TKA, but their impact on the survivorship of hinged prostheses has yet to be investigated. METHODS: We identified a consecutive series of 164 hinged prostheses and collected data on demographics, indications, complications, and re-revisions in patients who had fully cemented versus hybrid stems, with and without metaphyseal cones. A multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent variables associated with re-revision as the primary end point. RESULTS: In total, 84 patients (51.2%) had fully cemented stems, and 80 patients (48.8%) had hybrid stems. Cones were used in 73 patients (44.5%). At a mean follow-up of 3.4 ± 2.2 years, 42 patients underwent re-revision (25.8%), most commonly for infection (12.2%), followed by loosening (6.7%) and periprosthetic fracture (3.7%). Patients who had fully cemented stems had lower re-revision rates than hybrid fixation constructs (19 versus 26%, P = .043). Using multivariable regression, a construct with hybrid fixation with cones (odds ratio = 2.39; P = .037) was an independent risk factor for failure. Utilization of cones alone did not have an effect on re-revision rates at 3.4-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: While we found no difference with the use of cones, patients undergoing revision TKA with a hinge prosthesis and fully cemented stems had better overall survivorship than hybrid stems.

Good Short-Term Survivorship of Constrained Condylar Revision Knee Implants With Medial Pivot Kinematics: A Level IV Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The need for revision total knee arthroplasty surgery is increasing worldwide, and, in many cases, a constrained implant is required to provide joint stability. The purpose of this study was to examine the early loosening and functional outcome of a novel constrained condylar (CCK) revision total knee system designed to have medial pivot (MP) kinematics. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed, collecting clinical data from all patients who underwent revision total knee arthroplasty using a novel MP CCK system with a minimum four-year clinical follow-up. Patient demographics, survivorship, complications, and Forgotten Joint Score were analyzed based upon chart review. RESULTS: There were 49 patients available for follow-up, who had a 100% survivorship free of aseptic loosening. All-cause revision survivorship was 92%. There were 4 patients who subsequently underwent rerevision. The causes for rerevision included periprosthetic joint infection in 2 patients, coronal plane instability in one patient, and a traumatic knee dislocation in one patient. There were 45 patients who completed the Forgotten Joint Score, who had an average of 49.8 (± 32.8, range 6.25 to 100). CONCLUSIONS: At 4 years, mid-term follow-up, this novel CCK revision total knee system designed to have MP kinematics had good patient-reported outcomes with no revision for aseptic loosening. Future studies should evaluate the mid- and long-term survivorship of this innovative implant.