A Systematic Review of Clozapine Concentration-Dose Ratio from Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Studies in Children and Adolescents Treated with Clozapine for Mental Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring of clozapine in children and adolescents has received insufficient attention. Calculation of concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratios from trough steady-state concentrations estimate drug clearance. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search was conducted in 3 article databases from inception until January 10, 2023, and articles reporting clozapine concentrations in children and adolescents were retrieved. The pharmacokinetic quality of the studies was assessed, and clozapine C/D ratios were calculated using the sample mean clozapine dose and concentration. RESULTS: Of the 37 articles of potential interest, only 7 reported clozapine trough and steady-state concentrations. After excluding case reports and a study confounded by fluvoxamine, 4 studies on psychosis from Europe and the United States were included. The clozapine C/D ratios were similar to published adult values and ranged from 0.82 to 1.24 with a weighted mean of 1.08 ng/mL per mg/d. The weighted means were 334 mg/d for the dose and 380 ng/mL for the concentration. The stratified analysis of the weighted mean clozapine C/D ratios from 2 studies showed lower values in 52 male (1.05 ng/mL per mg/d) than in 46 female (1.46 ng/mL per mg/d) children and adolescents, with values similar to those reported for European adult nonsmokers. Two female adolescents had high clozapine C/D ratios (2.54 ng/mL per mg/d), an Asian American patient with borderline obesity and a patient with intellectual disability with low dosage (mean = 102 mg/d) and concentration (mean = 55 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Reports on clozapine therapeutic drug monitoring in children and adolescents are limited in number and quality. Future studies should focus on basic pharmacokinetic issues, such as stratification by sex, smoking, and relevant comedications with inductive or inhibitory properties.

Effect of propranolol on pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Clozapine is the effective therapy for treatment-refractory schizophrenia. However, the use of clozapine is limited by its adverse effects. As propranolol is frequently used for the prevention and treatment of clozapine-induced tachycardia, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of propranolol on steady state pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients. METHODS: We included 16 retrospective studies on the effects of propranolol on steady state pharmacokinetics of clozapine in schizophrenic patients, with data from both generic and brand name treatment phases in eight clozapine bioequivalence studies conducted in a single center in China from 2018 to 2022. Review Manager 5.4 was used for meta-analysis of the included studies. RESULTS: The SMDs with 95% CIs of AUC0-12, Cmax,ss, C, and C were calculated to be 0.44 (0.23, 0.64), 0.40 (0.20, 0.61), 0.43 (0.22, 0.63), and 0.44 (0.23, 0.64), respectively. These findings proved that combination with propranolol would increase the systemic exposure of clozapine. T1/2 of clozapine was significantly longer in the presence of propranolol than in the absence of propranolol (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.12, 0.52], p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference for T of clozapine in the presence or absence of propranolol (SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI [- 0.25, 0.15], p = 0.63). CONCLUSION: The combination with propranolol could significantly increase systemic exposure and extended T1/2 of clozapine, and thus need to be considered in prescribing decisions.

Association of clozapine and norclozapine levels with patient and therapy characteristics-focus on interaction with valproic acid.

PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to examine clozapine (CLZ) and norclozapine (NCLZ) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data and associated sources of pharmacokinetic variability, particularly the impact of valproic acid (VPA) use. METHODS: This study included 126 patients with psychiatric disorders on mono- or co-therapy with CLZ. Patients' data during routine TDM were collected retrospectively from clinical records. The descriptive and statistical analysis was computed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 22, NY, USA). Multiple linear regression, based on the last observations, was used to assess correlation between demographic characteristics, life habits and co-therapy with dose-corrected serum levels (C/D) of CLZ and NCLZ, as well as CLZ/NCLZ. RESULTS: A total of 295 CLZ concentrations were measured in 126 patients, with a mean of 275.5 ± 174.4 µg/L, while 124 NCLZ concentrations were determined in 74 patients, with a mean of 194.6 ± 149.8 µg/L. A statistically significant effect on ln-transformed CLZ C/D was confirmed for sex and smoking, whereas sex, smoking and VPA therapy were associated with ln-transformed NCLZ C/D. According to the final models, lower values of NCLZ C/D for about 45.9% can be expected in patients receiving VPA. Concomitant use of VPA was the only factor detected to contribute in CLZ/NCLZ variability. CONCLUSION: The results of this study may help clinicians interpret TDM data and optimize CLZ dosing regimens, especially in patients concomitantly treated with VPA. Our results show that VPA primarily decreases NCLZ levels, while alteration of the parent drug is not statistically significant.

Towards Precision Dosing of Clozapine in Schizophrenia: External Evaluation of Population Pharmacokinetic Models and Bayesian Forecasting.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic drug monitoring and treatment optimization of clozapine are recommended, owing to its narrow therapeutic range and pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. This study aims to assess the clinical applicability of published population PK models by testing their predictive performance in an external data set and to determine the effectiveness of Bayesian forecasting (BF) for clozapine treatment optimization. METHODS: Available models of clozapine were identified, and their predictive performance was determined using an external data set (53 patients, 151 samples). The median prediction error (PE) and median absolute PE were used to assess bias and inaccuracy. The potential factors influencing model predictability were also investigated. The final concentration was reestimated for all patients using covariates or previously observed concentrations. RESULTS: The 7 included models presented limited predictive performance. Only 1 model met the acceptability criteria (median PE ≤ ±20% and median absolute PE ≤30%). There was no difference between the data used for building the models (therapeutic drug monitoring or PK study) or the number of compartments in the models. A tendency for higher inaccuracy at low concentrations during treatment initiation was observed. Heterogeneities were observed in the predictive performances between the subpopulations, especially in terms of smoking status and sex. For the models included, BF significantly improved their predictive performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that upon external evaluation, clozapine models provide limited predictive performance, especially in subpopulations such as nonsmokers. From the perspective of model-informed prediction dosing, model predictability should be improved using updating or metamodeling methods. Moreover, BF substantially improved model predictability and could be used for clozapine treatment optimization.

Clinical and genetic influencing factors on clozapine pharmacokinetics in Tunisian schizophrenic patients.

Clozapine (Clz) is an atypical antipsychotic, which its pharmacokinetics can be influenced by several factors. The CYP1A2 and CYP2C19, major enzymes implicated in Clz metabolism, present an interethnic variation on their activity caused by single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The present study investigated the influence of genetic and nongenetic factors on Clz pharmacokinetics in a southern Mediterranean population. We included adult Tunisian schizophrenic patients having received Clz and undergone a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of Clz by morning C0 monitoring. The genomic DNA was extracted using a salting-out procedure. CYP1A2*1F (rs762551;-163C>A), CYP1A2*1C (rs2069514;-3860 G>A) and CYP 2C19*2 (rs4244285; 681G>A) was analyzed using PCR-RFLP. Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The mutant allele (CYP1A2*1F) was the most frequently detected (58.8%). For CYP1A2*1F, Clz dose-normalized (C0/D ratio) was as high as 1.28 ± 0.37 in CC versus 0.67 ± 0.32 ng mL-1 per mg day-1 in AA group (p < 0.001). The influence of genetic (CYP1A2*1F, CYP1A2*1C and CYP2C19*2) and nongenetic parameters (age, weight, gender, tobacco, coffee, and alcohol consumption) on the variation of the Clz C0/D ratio was investigated. Only the CYP1A2*1 F polymorphism correlates significantly with the Clz C0/D variation and could explain 24% of its variability. Our data support a critical role of the CYP1A2 -163C>A on the variation of Clz exposure in Tunisian schizophrenic patients. Considering its narrow therapeutic range, CYP1A2 genotyping combined with TDM of Clz may improve efficacy and safety of this drug. Further studies are needed to investigate this issue.

Clozapine affects the pharmacokinetics of risperidone and inhibits its metabolism and P-glycoprotein-mediated transport in vivo and in vitro: A safety attention to antipsychotic polypharmacy with clozapine and risperidone.

Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP), as one maintenance treatment strategy in patients with schizophrenia, has gained popularity in real-world clinical settings. Risperidone (RIS) and clozapine (CLZ) are the most commonly prescribed second-generation antipsychotics, and they are often used in combination as APP. In this study, the pharmacokinetics of RIS and CLZ in rats were examined after co-administration to explore the reliability and rationality of co-medication with RIS and CLZ. In addition, the effects of CLZ on RIS metabolism and transport in vitro were investigated. The results illustrated that in the 7-day continuous administration test in rats, when co-administered with CLZ, the area under curve and peak concentrations of RIS were increased by 2.2- and 3.1-fold at the first dose, respectively, increased by 3.4- and 6.2-fold at the last dose, respectively. The metabolite-to-parent ratio of RIS was approximately 22% and 33% lower than those of RIS alone group at the first and last doses, respectively. Moreover, CLZ significantly increased RIS concentrations in the brain (3.0-4.8 folds) and cerebrospinal fluid (2.1-3.5 folds) in rats, which was slightly lower than the impact of verapamil on RIS after co-medication. Experiments in vitro indicated that CLZ competitively inhibited the conversion of RIS to 9-hydroxy-RIS with the inhibition constants of 1.36 and 3.0 µM in rat and human liver microsomes, respectively. Furthermore, the efflux ratio of RIS in Caco-2 monolayers was significantly reduced by CLZ at 1 µM. Hence, CLZ may affect the exposure of RIS by inhibiting its metabolism and P-glycoprotein-mediated transport. These findings highlighted that APP with RIS and CLZ might increase the plasma concentrations of RIS and 9-hydroxy-RIS beyond the safety ranges and cause toxic side effects.

European Whites May Need Lower Minimum Therapeutic Clozapine Doses Than Those Customarily Proposed.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: A nomogram from a British naturalistic study proposed that the clozapine dosing needed to reach a serum concentration of 350 ng/mL ranged from 265 mg/d (female nonsmokers) to 525 mg/d (male smokers). Some European reviews have used these dosing recommendations, which seem greater than what we found in an Italian White sample ranging from 245 mg/d (female nonsmokers) to 299 mg/d (male smokers). Five other published samples of European Whites were added to the Italian sample to estimate clozapine doses recommended for reaching 350 ng/mL. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Average clozapine metabolizers were obtained by eliminating outliers with confounding variables: (1) psychiatric inducers and inhibitors; (2) doses less than 100 mg/d; and (3) when possible, patients with inflammation, obesity, or using oral contraceptives. The study included 1363 average metabolizer European Whites: the Italian sample and 5 new samples. Mean averages that reached serum concentration levels of 350 ng/mL were calculated after stratification by sex and smoking status in each sample. Then, weighted mean averages were obtained by combining the 6 samples. FINDINGS/RESULTS: The estimated weighted mean clozapine dosages ranged from 236 to 368 mg/d (236 mg/d in 218 female nonsmokers, 256 mg/d in 340 male nonsmokers, 357 mg/d in 269 female smokers, and 368 mg/d in 546 male smokers). IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our recommended dosages are less than those recommended in Europe. Future studies in European Whites need to replicate these recommended doses for average metabolizer patients after sex and smoking stratification and further explore clozapine dosing for those with relevant clinical confounders.

Pharmacokinetic changes of clozapine and norclozapine in a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease induced by orotic acid.

Impaired in vitro oxidation of clozapine has been reported in steatotic rat liver due to downregulation of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A. Pharmacokinetic changes of clozapine and its major metabolite, norclozapine, were evaluated in a rat model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) induced by orotic acid. Significantly slower in vitro CLint for formation of norclozapine from clozapine was observed in NAFLD rats than in control rats as a result of the reduced protein expression and metabolic activity of CYP1A1/2. However, systemic exposures to clozapine in NAFLD rats were comparable to those in controls after intravenous (4 mg/kg) and oral (10 mg/kg) administration of clozapine. Of note, the AUC of the norclozapine and AUCnorclozapine/AUCclozapine ratio following intravenous and oral administration of clozapine rather increased significantly in NAFLD rats, as a result of the slowed subsequent metabolism of norclozapine via CYP1A1/2. Steady-state brain concentrations of both clozapine and norclozapine were significantly higher in NAFLD rats than those in control rats following intravenous infusion of clozapine. Increased systemic exposure to norclozapine and elevated brain concentrations of clozapine and norclozapine observed in NAFLD rats imply that further studies are warranted on the pharmacotherapy of clozapine in patients with pre-existing or drug-induced hepatic steatosis.

Understanding variability in the pharmacokinetics of atypical antipsychotics - focus on clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole population models.

Antipsychotic medicines are widely used for the management of psychotic symptoms regardless of the underlying diagnosis. Most atypical antipsychotics undergo extensive metabolism prior to excretion. Various factors may influence their pharmacokinetics, particularly elimination, leading to highly variable drug concentrations between individual patients following the same dosing regimen. Population pharmacokinetic approach, based on nonlinear mixed effects modeling, is a useful tool to identify covariates explaining pharmacokinetic variability, as well as to characterize and distinguish unexplained residual and between-subject (interindividual) variability. In addition, this approach allows the use of both sparsely and intensively sampled data. In this paper, we reviewed the pharmacokinetic characteristics of clozapine, olanzapine and aripiprazole, focusing on a population modeling approach. In particular, models based on a nonlinear mixed effects approach performed by NONMEM® software in order to identify and quantify sources of pharmacokinetic variability are presented. Population models were identified through systematic searches of PubMed and sixteen studies were selected. Some of the factors identified that significantly contribute to variability in elimination among clozapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole are demographic characteristics, body weight, genetic polymorphism, smoking and in some cases drug interactions. Scientific research based on pharmacometric modeling is useful to further characterize sources of variability and their combined effect.

A Rational Use of Clozapine Based on Adverse Drug Reactions, Pharmacokinetics, and Clinical Pharmacopsychology.

Using Richardson and Davidson's model and the sciences of pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacopsychology, this article reviewed the: (1) poor life expectancy associated with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), which may be improved in patients who adhere to clozapine; (2) findings that clozapine is the best treatment for TRS (according to efficacy, effectiveness and well-being); and (3) potential for clozapine to cause vulnerabilities, including potentially lethal adverse drug reactions such as agranulocytosis, pneumonia, and myocarditis. Rational use requires: (1) modification of the clozapine package insert worldwide to include lower doses for Asians and to avoid the lethality associated with pneumonia, (2) the use of clozapine levels for personalizing dosing, and (3) the use of slow and personalized titration. This may make clozapine as safe as possible and contribute to increased life expectancy and well-being. In the absence of data on COVID-19 in clozapine patients, clozapine possibly impairs immunological mechanisms and may increase pneumonia risk in infected patients. Psychiatrists should call their clozapine patients and families and explain to them that if the patient develops fever or flu-like symptoms, the psychiatrist should be called and should consider halving the clozapine dose. If the patient is hospitalized with pneumonia, the treating physician needs to assess for symptoms of clozapine intoxication since halving the dose may not be enough for all patients; consider decreasing it to one-third or even stopping it. Once the signs of inflammation and fever have disappeared, the clozapine dose can be slowly increased to the prior dosage level.

Impact of smoking behavior on clozapine blood levels - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Tobacco smoking significantly impacts clozapine blood levels and has substantial implications on individual efficacy and safety outcomes. By investigating differences in clozapine blood levels in smoking and non-smoking patients on clozapine, we aim to provide guidance for clinicians how to adjust clozapine levels for patients on clozapine who change their smoking habits. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis on clozapine blood levels, norclozapine levels, norclozapine/clozapine ratios, and concentration to dose (C/D) ratios in smokers and non-smokers on clozapine. Data were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model with sensitivity analyses on dose, ethnic origin, and study quality. RESULTS: Data from 23 studies were included in this meta-analysis with 21 investigating differences between clozapine blood levels of smokers and non-smokers. In total, data from 7125 samples were included for the primary outcome (clozapine blood levels in ng/ml) in this meta-analysis. A meta-analysis of all between-subject studies (N = 16) found that clozapine blood levels were significantly lower in smokers compared with non-smokers (Standard Mean Difference (SMD) -0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.55 to -0.22, P < 0.001, I2  = 80%). With regard to the secondary outcome, C/D ratios (N = 16 studies) were significantly lower in the smoker group (n = 645) compared with the non-smoker group (n = 813; SMD -0.70, 95%CI -0.84 to -0.56, P < 0.00001, I2  = 17%). CONCLUSION: Smoking behavior and any change in smoking behavior is associated with a substantial effect on clozapine blood levels. Reductions of clozapine dose of 30% are recommended when a patient on clozapine stops smoking. Reductions should be informed by clozapine steady-state trough levels and a close clinical risk-benefit evaluation.

Clozapine and Norclozapine Plasma Levels in Patients Switched Between Different Liquid Formulations.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clozapine is the drug of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The primary objective of this study was to compare plasma clozapine and N-desmethylclozapine levels in patients switched between 2 liquid formulations [Denzapine suspension and clozapine oral solution (St George's ZTAS)]. Secondary objectives included comparison of safety, tolerability, and patient acceptability. METHODS: This was a noninterventional, observational, prospective follow-up of patients consecutively switched between formulations of clozapine liquid in a large inner-city NHS mental health trust. The authors also performed retrospective analysis of outcomes from patient case notes. RESULTS: The authors identified 43 patients receiving Denzapine suspension in the trust. Data were available for 43 patients switched from Denzapine to clozapine oral solution (St George's ZTAS), among whom, 15 (32%) were excluded from the analysis. Of the 28 patients for whom data were available, the 90% confidence interval for the ratio of mean values for corrected Cmin 91.5 (85.2%-98.4%) and uncorrected Cmin 91.2 (84.4%-98.6%) were within the guideline range of bioequivalence (80%-125%). Safety and tolerability profiles were comparable between the 2 formulations (P = 0.10). Patient acceptability was also similar between the brands in most domains. However, there was a taste preference for Denzapine suspension. CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference in clozapine plasma levels was observed after switching from Denzapine suspension to a recently introduced clozapine solution. This study also highlights the significance of medicinal characteristics such as taste for patient acceptability and compliance.

The Effects of Co-prescription of Pantoprazole on the Clozapine Metabolism.

BACKGROUND: Polypharmacy including somatic medications such as proton pump inhibitors is a common phenomenon in psychiatric care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pantoprazole effects on clozapine metabolism. METHODS: A large therapeutic drug-monitoring database containing plasma concentrations of CLZ was analyzed. The results were stratified into four groups: a non-smoking (n=250) and a smoking group (n=326), and two groups co-medicated with pantoprazole: non-smokers (n=26) and smokers (n=29). The analysis was based on the non-parametrical Mann-Whitney U test (M-W-U) with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: Differences reached statistical significance for pharmacokinetic parameters between CLZ monotherapy and co-medication with pantoprazole neither in smokers nor in non-smokers (p>0.05 for M-W-U in pairwise comparisons). In patients with clozapine monotherapy, smokers had a higher daily dosage of CLZ compared to non-smokers (mean dosage 363±181 vs. 291±145 mg/day, p<0.001 for M-W-U). CONCLUSIONS: Adding pantoprazole to an ongoing treatment with clozapine does not alter the metabolism of clozapine to a significant extent.

A Comparative Study of the Pharmacokinetics of Clozapine N-Oxide and Clozapine N-Oxide Hydrochloride Salt in Rhesus Macaques.

Translating chemogenetic techniques from nonhuman primates to potential clinical applications has been complicated in part due to in vivo conversion of the chemogenetic actuator, clozapine N-oxide (CNO), to its pharmacologically active parent compound, clozapine, a ligand with known side effects, including five boxed warnings from the Food and Drug Administration. Additionally, the limited solubility of CNO requires high concentrations of potentially toxic detergents such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). To address these concerns, pharmacokinetic profiling of commercially available CNO in DMSO (CNO-DMSO, 10% v/v DMSO in saline) and a water-soluble salt preparation (CNO-HCl, saline) was conducted in rhesus macaques. A time course of blood plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of CNO and clozapine was conducted (30-240 minutes post-administration) following a range of doses (3-10 mg/kg, i.m. and/or i.v.) of CNO-DMSO or CNO-HCl. CNO-HCl resulted in 6- to 7-fold higher plasma concentrations of CNO compared to CNO-DMSO, and relatively less clozapine (3%-5% clozapine/CNO in the CNO-DMSO group and 0.5%-1.5% clozapine/CNO in the CNO-HCl group). Both groups had large between-subjects variability, pointing to the necessity of performing individual CNO pharmacokinetic studies prior to further experimentation. The ratio of CNO measured in the CSF was between 2% and 6% of that measured in the plasma and did not differ across drug preparation, indicating that CSF concentrations may be approximated from plasma samples. In conclusion, CNO-HCl demonstrated improved bioavailability compared with CNO-DMSO with less conversion to clozapine. Further investigation is needed to determine if brain concentrations of clozapine following CNO-HCl administration are pharmacologically active at off-target monoaminergic receptor systems in the primate brain.

Impact of CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms on pharmacokinetics of antipsychotic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of CYP1A2-metabolized antipsychotic drugs in humans by means of systematic review and meta-analysis. METHOD: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and Scopus databases as of June 26, 2018. Studies reporting the pharmacokinetic parameters of CYP1A2-metabolized antipsychotic drugs in individuals who were genotyped for CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms were retrieved. Pharmacokinetic parameters of individuals who have mutant alleles of a CYP1A2 genetic polymorphism were compared with the wild-type individuals. Pooled-effect estimates, presented as standardized mean difference, were calculated by means of the fixed-effect or random-effects model, as appropriate. RESULTS: Ten studies involving 872 clozapine users, seven studies involving 712 olanzapine users, and two studies involving 141 haloperidol users were included. All but one study reported no associations between any CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms and the pharmacokinetics of CYP1A2-metabolized antipsychotic drugs. The pooled-effect estimates through meta-analyses of seven studies demonstrated no significant associations between the -163C>A or -2467delT polymorphism and clozapine or olanzapine concentrations in the blood. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that CYP1A2 genetic polymorphisms have no significant impact on the pharmacokinetics of CYP1A2-metabolized antipsychotic drugs. CYP1A2 genotyping may have no clinical implications for personalized dosing of CYP1A2-metabolized antipsychotic drugs.

Comedication of Valproic Acid Is Associated With Increased Metabolism of Clozapine.

OBJECTIVES: Valproic acid and clozapine are drugs commonly used in the treatment of schizophrenic and schizoaffective disorders. Pharmacokinetic interactions of valproic acid with several drugs are well known, yet results concerning the interaction with clozapine are inconsistent. METHODS: Steady-state dose-corrected serum concentrations of clozapine and its main metabolite norclozapine were retrospectively analyzed in 45 patients receiving both clozapine and valproic acid. Controls were matched for sex, age, smoking, comedication, and inflammatory response. RESULTS: The group receiving comedication with valproic acid showed significantly lower median dose-corrected serum concentrations of norclozapine (0.44 [0.27-0.58] (ng/mL)/(mg/d) vs 0.78 [0.60-1.07] (ng/mL)/(mg/d)) as well as metabolite to parent compound ratios (0.40 [0.36-0.47] vs 0.71 [0.58-0.84]) by approximately 44%. Dose-corrected serum concentrations of clozapine were not significantly lower. The effect of valproic acid was independent of sex and smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Comedication with valproic acid accelerated metabolism of clozapine with predominant effects on the degradation of norclozapine. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be applied to guide individual patient responses upon initiation of comedication.

Development of a nomogram for the estimation of long-term adherence to clozapine therapy using neutrophil fluorescence.

AIMS: Previously, we have reported an association between clozapine use and elevated FL3 neutrophil fluorescence, a flow-cytometric parameter for cell viability. Here, we developed and evaluated a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model relating FL3-fluorescence to clozapine exposure and derived a nomogram for estimation of long-term adherence. METHODS: Data from 27 patients initiating clozapine were analysed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling. A previously described pharmacokinetic model for clozapine was coupled to a FL3 fluorescence model. For this, an effect compartment with clozapine concentrations as input and a first order decay rate as output was linked with an Emax model to FL3-fluorescence. FL3-fluorescence was simulated for clozapine doses of 50, 150 and 400 mg daily (n = 10 000) to establish the nomogram. Finally, true simulated adherence (% of daily doses taken over 100 days) was compared to nomogram-estimated adherence to evaluate the performance of the nomogram. RESULTS: The half-life of FL3-fluorescence was estimated at 228 h (coefficient of variation 35%). Median absolute prediction errors of the nomogram in case of fully random adherence for 50, 150 and 400 mg ranged from -0.193% to -0.525%. The nomogram performed slightly worse in case of nonrandom adherence (median prediction error up to 5.19%), but was still clinically acceptable. Compliance patterns containing longer drug holidays revealed that the nomogram adequately estimates compliance over approximately the last 3 weeks prior to FL3-measurement. CONCLUSION: Our nomogram could provide information regarding long-term adherence based on prescribed clozapine dose and FL3-fluorescence. Future studies should further explore the clinical value of this biomarker and nomogram.

Effect of Valproate and Antidepressant Drugs on Clozapine Metabolism in Patients With Psychotic Mood Disorders.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to appraise retrospectively the influence of valproate (VPA) and antidepressants (ADs) on the steady-state plasma concentrations of clozapine (CLZ), the prototype of various second-generation antipsychotics, norclozapine (NCLZ, its main metabolite), and their ratio (NCLZ:CLZ). METHODS: Sixty-seven psychotic patients with a prevalent diagnosis of bipolar disorder were studied. We then analyzed data altogether and subdivided them into 4 groups, according to pharmacological treatments: #1 CLZ (n = 21), #2 CLZ plus ADs (n = 13), #3 CLZ plus VPA (n = 16), and #4 CLZ plus ADs plus VPA (n = 17). RESULTS: First, significant positive between CLZ and NCLZ plasma levels (in nanograms/milliliter) and the drug daily dosages (in milligrams/kilogram of body weight) (n = 67) were observed (Spearman: rCLZ = 0.49; rNCLZ = 0.61; P < 0.001). We then normalized by given doses CLZ and NCLZ plasma levels, natural log transformed them, and performed analysis of variance factor analyses followed by pairwise comparisons, performed on the 4 groups and the 3 CLZ parameters. We identified significant drug effects on (1) CLZ plasma levels, significantly higher in group #2 versus group #1, and (2) NCLZ:CLZ ratio, lower in group #2 versus groups #1 and #3. Significant drug × gender interactions were observed in group #3, showing higher NCLZ levels and NCLZ:CLZ ratios in men compared with women. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its inherent limitations, this observational study confirms the significant increase in plasma CLZ concentrations and reduction in NCLZ:CLZ ratio when this drug was coadministered with ADs (group #2), an effect apparently counteracted by VPA (group #4). The drug × gender interactions in patients taking both CLZ and VPA (group #3) warrant further prospective study.

Clozapine-Induced Acute Hyperglycemia Is Accompanied with Elevated Serum Concentrations of Adrenaline and Glucagon in Rats.

Clozapine, an atypical antipsychotic agent, has been reported to cause acute hyperglycemia. However, the mechanism of clozapine-induced rapidly developing hyperglycemia is not well elucidated. To clarify the mechanism underlying clozapine-induced acute hyperglycemia, we investigated the effects of single intravenous administration of clozapine on the serum concentrations of glucose and several endogenous substances in rats. Male Wistar rats received an intravenous injection of saline (control) or clozapine 2.5, 5, 10 mg/kg. Blood samples were obtained periodically after clozapine administration to determine the serum concentrations of glucose, adrenaline, glucagon, insulin, corticosterone, and clozapine. The serum concentrations of glucose, adrenaline, and glucagon increased dose-dependently after the administration of clozapine at 2.5-10 mg/kg, and reached maxima at 5 mg/kg of clozapine. The serum concentration of corticosterone increased after the administration of clozapine, but no significant variation was observed with the dosage of clozapine. The concentration of serum insulin increased in a dose-dependent manner after clozapine administration. In conclusion, a single administration of clozapine increased the serum concentration of glucose in rats, and adrenaline and/or glucagon would be associated with clozapine-induced acute hyperglycemia.

Two cases of high serum clozapine concentrations occurring during inflammation in Chinese patients.

Objective Serious infections or inflammations have been associated with serum clozapine concentration increases and sometimes with clozapine toxicity. Method These two cases describe Chinese patients (Case 1: a 57-year-old female nonsmoker with severe dermatitis and Case 2: a 47-year-old male nonsmoker with influenza and secondary infection). Results In both cases, the Drug Interaction Probability Scale established the presence of a probable drug-drug interaction. In both cases, the clozapine and the total clozapine concentration-to-dose ratios followed a temporal pattern (normal-high-normal), consistent with an inhibition of clozapine metabolism during peak inflammation. In the first case, the total clozapine concentration-to-dose ratio (8 with no/low inflammation: median of 3.10 and 2 at peak inflammation: median of 3.90) provided a significant difference (P = 0.044). In the second patient, because of the smaller sample size and reduced statistical power (4 with no infection: a median of 1.59 and 2 at peak infection: 3.46), the increase did not reach significance (P = 0.13). In the first case, the median baseline clozapine concentration-to-dose ratio increased by a factor of 1.45 from 2.00 to a peak of 2.89. To compensate for the inhibition of clozapine metabolism, the dose correction factor was 0.69 (1/1.45) or a decrease in dose of approximately one-third. In the second case, the median baseline clozapine concentration-to-dose ratio increased by a factor of 2.56 from 1.15 to a peak of 2.94. Conclusion This provided a dose correction factor of 0.40 (1/2.56) or approximately half the dose, similar to published cases in Caucasians with serious respiratory infections.