Postprocedural Anticoagulation After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) is frequently administered after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, although no conclusive data support this practice. METHODS: The RIGHT trial (Comparison of Anticoagulation Prolongation vs no Anticoagulation in STEMI Patients After Primary PCI) was an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority trial conducted at 53 centers in China. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned by center to receive low-dose PPA or matching placebo for at least 48 hours. Before trial initiation, each center selected 1 of 3 PPA regimens (40 mg of enoxaparin once daily subcutaneously; 10 U·kg·h of unfractionated heparin intravenously, adjusted to maintain activated clotting time between 150 and 220 seconds; or 0.2 mg·kg·h of bivalirudin intravenously). The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate superiority of PPA to reduce the primary efficacy end point of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, stent thrombosis (definite), or urgent revascularization (any vessel) within 30 days. The key secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of each specific anticoagulation regimen (enoxaparin, unfractionated heparin, or bivalirudin) on the primary efficacy end point. The primary safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days. RESULTS: Between January 10, 2019, and September 18, 2021, a total of 2989 patients were randomized. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 37 patients (2.5%) in both the PPA and placebo groups (hazard ratio, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.63 to 1.57]). The incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium 3 to 5 bleeding did not differ between the PPA and placebo groups (8 [0.5%] vs 11 [0.7%] patients; hazard ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.30 to 1.83]). CONCLUSIONS: Routine PPA after primary percutaneous coronary intervention was safe but did not reduce 30-day ischemic events. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03664180.

Bivalirudin Versus Heparin During PCI in NSTEMI: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of Large Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: The benefit:risk profile of bivalirudin versus heparin anticoagulation in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. Study-level meta-analyses lack granularity to provide conclusive answers. We sought to compare the outcomes of bivalirudin and heparin in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI. METHODS: We performed an individual patient data meta-analysis of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in all 5 trials that randomized ≥1000 patients with any myocardial infarction undergoing PCI to bivalirudin versus heparin (MATRIX [Minimizing Adverse Hemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox], VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART [Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in ST-Segment and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy in the Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies Registry Trial], ISAR-REACT 4 [Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment 4], ACUITY [Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage Strategy], and BRIGHT [Bivalirudin in Acute Myocardial Infarction vs Heparin and GPI Plus Heparin Trial]). The primary effectiveness and safety end points were 30-day all-cause mortality and serious bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 12 155 patients were randomized: 6040 to bivalirudin (52.3% with a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion), and 6115 to heparin (53.2% with planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use). Thirty-day mortality was not significantly different between bivalirudin and heparin (1.2% versus 1.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.86-1.79]; P=0.25). Cardiac mortality, reinfarction, and stent thrombosis rates were also not significantly different. Bivalirudin reduced serious bleeding (both access site-related and non-access site-related) compared with heparin (3.3% versus 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48-0.72; P<0.0001). Outcomes were consistent regardless of use of a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion or routine lycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use with heparin and during 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PCI, procedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin and heparin did not result in significantly different rates of mortality or ischemic events, including stent thrombosis and reinfarction. Bivalirudin reduced serious bleeding compared with heparin arising both from the access site and nonaccess sites.

Comparison of bleeding and thrombotic outcomes in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Heparin versus bivalirudin.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications with heparin versus bivalirudin use in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult patients placed on V-V ECMO with intravenous anticoagulation with either heparin or bivalirudin. Time to thrombotic event and major bleed were analyzed in addition to related outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 95 patients placed on V-V ECMO: 61 receiving heparin, 34 bivalirudin. The bivalirudin group had a higher rate of severe COVID-19, higher BMI, and longer ECMO duration. Despite this, bivalirudin was associated with reduced risk of thrombotic event (HR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.32, p < .001) and increased average lifespan of the circuit membrane lung (16 vs. 10 days, p = 0.004). While there was no difference in major bleeding, the bivalirudin group required fewer transfusions of packed red blood cells and platelets per 100 ECMO days (means of 13 vs. 39, p = 0.004; 5 vs. 19, p = .014, respectively). Lastly, the bivalirudin group had improved survival to ECMO decannulation in univariate analysis (median OS 53 vs. 26 days, p = .015). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world analysis of bivalirudin versus heparin, bivalirudin is a viable option for V-V ECMO and associated with lower risk of thrombotic complications and fewer transfusion requirements.

Bivalirudin versus Heparin on Net Adverse Clinical Events, Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebral Events, and Bleeding in Elderly Chinese Patients Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Bivalirudin as an anticoagulant reduces bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), while its impact in elderly Chinese patients treated with PCI needs more evidence. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between bivalirudin and heparin in elderly Chinese patients treated with PCI. This cohort study retrieved data of 1,286 elderly patients treated with PCI who used bivalirudin (bivalirudin group, N = 493) or heparin (heparin group, N = 793) as anticoagulants. Net adverse clinical events (NACEs) (primary endpoint), major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs), bleeding, and major bleeding within 30 days after PCI treatment were recorded for analysis. Our study illustrated that NACEs (12.4% vs. 17.4%, P = 0.015), bleeding (6.7% vs. 12.1%, P = 0.002), and major bleeding (2.2% vs. 6.6%, P < 0.001) were fewer in bivalirudin group compared to heparin group. No difference was found in MACCEs (7.5% vs. 9.6%,P = 0.200), and incidences of all-cause mortality (P = 0.257), cardiac mortality (P = 0.504), recurrent myocardial infarction (P = 0.423), ischemia-driven revascularization (P = 0.509), and stroke (P = 0.467), between bivalirudin group and heparin group. According to univariate logistic regression analyses, bivalirudin (vs. heparin) correlated with fewer NACEs (P = 0.016), bleeding (P = 0.002), and major bleeding (P = 0.001) in elderly patients treated with PCI, but not MACCEs (P = 0.202). After adjustment, bivalirudin (vs. heparin) was an independent factor for fewer NACEs [odds ratio (OR): 0.619, P = 0.009], bleeding (OR: 0.499, P = 0.003), and major bleeding (OR: 0.342, P = 0.003) in these patients. In summary, bivalirudin achieves fewer NACEs, bleeding, and major bleeding, but not MACCEs, versus heparin in elderly patients treated with PCI, which is verified in the multivariate model.

Futoquinol improves Aß25-35-induced memory impairment in mice by inhibiting the activation of p38MAPK through the glycolysis pathway and regulating the composition of the gut microbiota.

Futoquinol (Fut) is a compound extracted from Piper kadsura that has a nerve cell protection effect. However, it is unclear whether Fut has protective effects in Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this study, we aimed to explore the therapeutic effect of Fut in AD and its underlying mechanism. UPLC-MS/MS method was performed to quantify Fut in the hippocampus of mice brain. The cognition ability, neuronal and mitochondria damage, and levels of Aß1-42, Aß1-40, p-Tau, oxidative stress, apoptosis, immune cells, and inflammatory factors were measured in Aß25-35-induced mice. The content of bacterial meta-geometry was predicted in the microbial composition based on 16S rDNA. The protein levels of HK II, p-p38MAPK, and p38MAPK were detected. PC-12 cells were cultured in vitro, and glucose was added to activate glycolysis to further explore the mechanism of action of Fut intervention in AD. Fut improved the memory and learning ability of Aß25-35 mice, and reduced neuronal damage and the deposition of Aß and Tau proteins. Moreover, Fut reduced mitochondrial damage, the levels of oxidative stress, apoptosis, and inflammatory factors. Fut significantly inhibited the expression of HK II and p-p38MAPK proteins. The in vitro experiment showed that p38MAPK was activated and Fut action inhibited after adding 10 mM glucose. Fut might inhibit the activation of p38MAPK through the glycolysis pathway, thereby reducing oxidative stress, apoptosis, and inflammatory factors and improving Aß25-35-induced memory impairment in mice. These data provide pharmacological rationale for Fut in the treatment of AD.

Bivalirudin as a substitute for heparin in neurointervention for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

OBJECTIVES: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a known complication of heparin exposure with potentially life-threatening sequelae. Direct thrombin inhibitors can be substituted for heparin in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia that require anticoagulation. However, the use of direct thrombin inhibitors as a substitute for heparin has not been widely reported in the neuroendovascular literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we report the first use of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin in a neuroendovascular procedure as a substitute for heparin in a patient with a ruptured pseudoaneurysm and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, and review the literature on the use of bivalirudin and argatroban for such patients. RESULTS: Bivalirudin was safely and effectively used in the case reported, with no thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications. Our literature review revealed a paucity of studies on the use of heparin alternatives, including bivalirudin, in neuroendovascular procedures in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is an important iatrogenic disease process in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures, and developing protocols to diagnose and manage heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is important for healthcare systems. While further research needs to be done to establish the full range of anticoagulation options to substitute for heparin, our case indicates bivalirudin as a potential candidate.

Impact of coronary artery disease on clinical outcomes after TAVR: Insights from the BRAVO-3 randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prognostic impact of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients randomized to bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). BACKGROUND: CAD is a common comorbidity among patients undergoing TAVR and studies provide conflicting data on its prognostic impact. METHODS: The Bivalirudin on Aortic Valve Intervention Outcomes-3 (BRAVO-3) randomized trial compared the use of bivalirudin versus UFH in 802 high-surgical risk patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Patients were stratified according to the presence or absence of history of CAD as well as periprocedural anticoagulation. The coprimary endpoints were net adverse cardiac events (NACE; a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding) and major Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) bleeding ≥3b at 30 days postprocedure. RESULTS: Among 801 patients, 437 (54.6%) had history of CAD of whom 223 (51.0%) received bivalirudin. There were no significant differences in NACE (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.58) or BARC ≥ 3b bleeding (adjusted OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.51-1.39) in patients with vs without CAD at 30 days. Among CAD patients, periprocedural use of bivalirudin was associated with similar NACE (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.47-1.35) and BARC ≥ 3b bleeding (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.33-1.25) compared with UFH, irrespective of history of CAD (p-interaction = 0.959 for NACE; p-interaction = 0.479 for major bleeding). CONCLUSION: CAD was not associated with a higher short-term risk of NACE or major bleeding after TAVR. Periprocedural anticoagulation with bivalirudin did not show any advantage over UFH in patients with and without CAD.

Outcomes of systemic bivalirudin and sodium bicarbonate purge solution for Impella 5.5.

BACKGROUND: Impella 5.5 (Abiomed; Danvers, MA) (IMP5) is a commonly used, surgically implanted, tMCS device that requires systemic anticoagulation and purge solution to avoid pump failure. To avoid heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) from unfractionated heparin (UFH) use, our program has explored the utility of bivalirudin (BIV) for systemic anticoagulation and sodium bicarbonate-dextrose purge solution (SBPS) in IMP5.5. METHODS: This single center, retrospective study included 34 patients supported on IMP5.5 with BIV based AC and SBPS between December 1st 2020 to December 1st 2021.The efficacy and safety end points were incidence of development of HIT, Tissue Plasminogen Activator (tPA) use for suspected pump thrombosis, stroke, and device failure as well as clinically significant bleeding. RESULTS: The median duration of IMP5.5 support was 9.8 days (IQR: 6-15). Most patients were bridged to HTX (58%) followed by recovery (27%) and LVAD implantation (15%). Patients were therapeutic on bivalirudin for 64% of their IMP5.5 support. One patient (2.9%) suffered from ischemic stroke and 26.5% (9) patients developed clinically significant bleeding. tPA was administered to 7(21%) patients. One patient in the entire cohort developed HIT. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience supports the use of systemic BIV and SBPS as a method to avoid heparin exposure in a patient population predisposed to the development of HIT.

Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

This study describes the use of bivalirudin in children on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Pediatric patients receiving bivalirudin were compared to patients receiving heparin as the anticoagulant on ECMO. Data was collected for children under 18 years of age supported by ECMO from January 2016 to December 2019. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, ECMO indication, type, and duration, indication for bivalirudin use, dose range, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) levels, minor and major bleeding, hemolysis, and mortality. Forty pediatric patients received ECMO; eight received bivalirudin primarily for anticoagulation. The median age was 4 months (IQR 0.5, 92) in the heparin cohort, 0.6 months (IQR 0.0, 80.0) in the primary bivalirudin cohort. The indication for ECMO was respiratory in 5 patients (18%) in the heparin group versus 6 (75%) in the primary bivalirudin group, cardiac in 18 (67%) in heparin versus 1 (12.5%) in primary bivalirudin, and extracorporeal-cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) in 4 (15%) in heparin versus 1 (12.5%) in primary bivalirudin. Bivalirudin was the initial anticoagulant for eight patients (66.6%) while three (25%) were switched due to concern for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and one (8%) for heparin resistance. The median time to achieve therapeutic aPTT was 14.5 hours compared to 12 hours in the heparin group. Sixty-five percent of aPTT values in the bivalirudin and 44% of values in the heparin group were in the therapeutic range in the first 7 days. Patients with primary bivalirudin use had significantly lower dose requirement at 12 (p = 0.003), 36 (p = 0.007), and 48 (p = 0.0002) hours compared to patients with secondary use of bivalirudin. One patient (12.5%) had major bleeding, and two patients (25%) required circuit change in the primary bivalirudin cohort. Bivalirudin may provide stable and successful anticoagulation in children. Further large, multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Evaluation of itch and pain induced by bovine adrenal medulla (BAM)8-22, a new human model of non-histaminergic itch.

Chronic itch is a socioeconomic burden with limited management options. Non-histaminergic itch, involved in problematic pathological itch conditions, is transmitted by a subgroup of polymodal C-fibres. Cowhage is traditionally used for studying experimentally induced non-histaminergic itch in humans but encounters some limitations. The present study, therefore, aims to design a new human, experimental model of non-histaminergic itch based on the application of bovine adrenal medulla (BAM)8-22, an endogenous peptide that activates the MrgprX1 receptor. Twenty-two healthy subjects were recruited. Different concentrations (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/ml) of BAM8-22 solution and vehicle, applied by a single skin prick test (SPT), were tested in the first session. In the second session, the BAM8-22 solution (1 mg/ml) was applied by different number of SPTs (1, 5 and 25) and by heat-inactivated cowhage spicules coated with BAM8-22. Provoked itch and pain intensities were monitored for 9 min, followed by the measurement of superficial blood perfusion (SBP) and mechanical and thermal sensitivities. BAM8-22 induced itch at the concentration of 1, 2 mg/ml (p < 0.05) and with the significantly highest intensity when applied through BAM8-22 spicules (p < 0.001). No concomitant pain sensation or increased SBP was observed. SBP increased only in the 25 SPTs area probably due to microtrauma from the multiple skin penetrations. Mechanical and thermal sensitivities were not affected by any of the applications. BAM8-22 applied through heat-inactivated spicules was the most efficient method to induce itch (without pain or changes in SBP and mechanical and thermal sensitivities) suggesting BAM8-22 as a novel non-histaminergic, human, experimental itch model.

The kinase PKCα selectively upregulates interleukin-17A during Th17 cell immune responses.

Transforming growth-factor ß (TGFß) has been implicated in T helper 17 (Th17) cell biology and in triggering expression of interleukin-17A (IL-17A), which is a key Th17 cell cytokine. Deregulated TGFß receptor (TGFßR) signaling has been implicated in Th17-cell-mediated autoimmune pathogenesis. Nevertheless, the full molecular mechanisms involved in the activation of the TGFßR pathway in driving IL-17A expression remain unknown. Here, we identified protein kinase C α (PKCα) as a signaling intermediate specific to the Th17 cell subset in the activation of TGFßRI. We have shown that PKCα physically interacts and functionally cooperates with TGFßRI to promote robust SMAD2-3 activation. Furthermore, PKCα-deficient (Prkca(-/-)) cells demonstrated a defect in SMAD-dependent IL-2 suppression, as well as decreased STAT3 DNA binding within the Il17a promoter. Consistently, Prkca(-/-) cells failed to mount appropriate IL-17A, but not IL-17F, responses in vitro and were resistant to induction of Th17-cell-dependent experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in vivo.

Effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin in elderly patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A real-world study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin monotherapy in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Bivalirudin is recommended for periprocedural use in patients undergoing PCI who are of high bleeding risk. However, its safe and efficacious use in elderly patients, a typical high bleeding risk cohort, in real world practice is yet to be reported. METHODS: In this single center, real-world observational study, 4736 consecutive elderly patients who underwent PCI were enrolled. Of these, 1240 were treated with bivalirudin and 3496 with heparin according to the periprocedural anticoagulation strategies of PCI. The primary outcome was 12-month net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, or any bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. RESULTS: After PSM, bivalirudin was found to be associated with lower rates of NACE (19.1% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.002), cardiac death (2.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.038), and any bleeding (10.0% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.023) compared to heparin monotherapy. No differences were found in the incidences of myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, stent thrombosis (0.1% vs. 0.1%, p = 1.000), and major bleedings (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 1.000) between the two patient groups. CONCLUSION: In this real-world observational study, periprocedural use of bivalirudin in elderly patients who underwent PCI was associated with less cardiac death and any bleeding compared to heparin monotherapy, without increased risk of stent thrombosis.

Bivalirudin versus heparin in adult and pediatric patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus those of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies enrolling ECMO patients on bivalirudin and UFH (from inception till July 2021). Meta-analysis was conducted. The I2 statistic and p value were used in measuring heterogeneity, and random effects or fixed-effect model was adopted. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used for the risk of bias assessment. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were undertaken. We performed Egger's test to evaluate publication bias. RESULTS: Fourteen eligible retrospective observational studies with 1501 subjects were identified. Compared with UFH, bivalirudin significantly reduced the risk of in-circuit thrombosis (OR = 0.44, 95% CI [0.31-0.61], p = 0.000), thrombosis (OR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.45-0.83], p= 0.002) and hospital mortality (OR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.61-0.99], p = 0.04) and had a positive impact on survival ECMO (OR = 1.50, 95% CI [1.04-2.16], p= 0.032). Decrease in risk of bleeding (OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.14-0.91], p = 0.031) associated with bivalirudin was observed. Sources of heterogeneity were identified, and sensitivity analysis revealed similar results. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis suggested that bivalirudin was associated with the decreased risk of in-circuit thrombosis, thrombosis, hospital mortality and bleeding in patients on ECMO and improved survival ECMO, indicating the superiority of bivalirudin to UFH in terms of efficacy and safety.

Comprehensive safety profile evaluation of bivalirudin in Chinese ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective, multicenter, intensive monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: This prospective, multi-center, intensive monitoring study aimed to systematically assess the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs), especially thrombocytopenia and bleeding, as well as their risk factors in Chinese ST-segment elevation myocardial infraction (STEMI) patients receiving bivalirudin as anticoagulant for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: In total, 1244 STEMI patients undergoing PCI and receiving bivalirudin as anticoagulant were enrolled in the present study. Safety data were collected from hospital admission to 72 h after bivalirudin administration; in addition, patients were further followed up at the 30th day with safety data collected at that time. RESULTS: AEs, severe AEs, ADRs and severe ADRs were reported in 224 (18.0%), 15 (1.2%), 49 (3.9%) and 5 (0.4%) patients, respectively. Importantly, 4 (0.3%) patients were submitted to hospitalization and 6 (0.5%) patients died due to AEs, while 1 (0.1%) patient was submitted to hospitalization but no (0.0%) patient died due to ADRs. Meanwhile, thrombocytopenia and bleeding occurred in 24 (1.9%) and 21 (1.7%) patients, respectively. Further multivariate logistic analysis identified several important independent factors related to AEs, ADRs, thrombocytopenia or bleeding, which included history of cardiac surgery and renal function impairment, high CRUSADE risk stratification, elective operation and combination with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Moreover, 4 multivariate models were constructed based on the above-mentioned factors, which all showed acceptable predictive value for AEs, ADRs, thrombocytopenia and bleeding, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin is a well-tolerant anticoagulant in Chinese STEMI patients undergoing PCI procedure.

Safety profile of bivalirudin in Chinese female patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a multi-center study.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to comprehensively investigate the occurrence and risk factors of adverse events (AEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs) (especially for thrombocytopenia and bleeding) in Chinese female patients receiving bivalirudin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: A total of 918 female patients from 27 Chinese medical centers took bivalirudin as anticoagulant for PCI were enrolled in this prospective, multi-center, intensive monitoring study. Safety data (AEs, ADRs, thrombocytopenia and bleeding) were collected from admission to 72 h post bivalirudin administration; then, patients were followed up at the 30th day with the safety data collected as well. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty (13.1%) patients occurred AEs, among which 7 (0.8%) cases experienced severe AEs, and 2 (0.2%) cases died. Besides, 40 (4.4%) patients occurred bivalirudin-related ADRs, in which 3 (0.3%) cases experienced severe ADRs, but 0 (0.0%) cases died. It was of note that 27 (2.9%) and 13 (1.4%) patients experienced thrombocytopenia and bleeding, respectively. Subsequent multivariate analyses observed that: clinical presentation of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) (odds ratio (OR) = 3.191, P = 0.004), CRUSADE high risk (OR = 2.075, P = 0.031), multiple culprit vessel (OR = 2.328, P = 0.019) independently correlated with higher risk of bivalirudin-related ADRs; clinical presentation of SCAD (OR = 4.388, P = 0.002) and multiple culprit vessel (OR = 2.974, P = 0.010) independently linked with raised thrombocytopenia risk; history of diabetes mellitus (OR = 5.227, P = 0.007) and CRUSADE high risk (OR = 4.475, P = 0.016) were independent factor related to elevated bleeding risk. CONCLUSION: Bivalirudin is well tolerated with low ADRs, thrombocytopenia and bleeding incidences in Chinese female patients undergoing PCI.

Bivalirudin or Unfractionated Heparin for Anticoagulation in Pediatric Patients on Continuous Flow Ventricular Assist Device Support: Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that is being increasingly used for anticoagulation in children after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation. While the data on bivalirudin use in pulsatile flow VADs are growing, reports on its use in patients on continuous flow (CF) VAD as well as comparisons of associated outcomes with unfractionated heparin (UFH) remain limited. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single tertiary-quaternary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients less than 21 years old on CF-VAD support who received bivalirudin or UFH for anticoagulation between the years 2016 and 2020. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinical characteristics compared between the cohorts included time to target range of anticoagulation, markers of hemolysis, and prevalence of hemocompatibility-related adverse events such as major hemorrhagic complications, ischemic stroke, and pump thrombosis. In 42 unique patients (41 HeartWare HVAD [Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN], one HeartMate 3 LVAD [Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL]) during the study period, a total of 67 encounters of IV anticoagulation infusions (29 UFH and 38 bivalirudin) were retrospectively reviewed. In comparison with use of UFH, bivalirudin was associated with lesser odds of major bleeding complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; p = 0.038). We failed to identify any difference in odds of major thrombotic complications (OR, 2.53; 95% CI, 0.47-13.59; p = 0.450). Eight of the patients (28%) on UFH were switched to bivalirudin due to hemorrhagic or thrombotic complications or inability to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation, while two of the patients (5%) on bivalirudin were switched to UFH due to hemorrhagic complications. Bivalirudin was used for a "washout" in eight cases with concern for pump thrombosis-six had resolution of the pump thrombosis, while two needed pump exchange. CONCLUSIONS: Use of bivalirudin for anticoagulation in patients on CF-VAD support was associated with lesser odds of hemorrhagic complications compared with use of UFH. Bivalirudin "washout" was successful in medical management of six of eight cases of possible pump thrombosis.

Adiponectin improves amyloid-ß 31-35-induced circadian rhythm disorder in mice.

Adiponectin is an adipocyte-derived hormone, which is closely associated with the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has potential preventive and therapeutic significance. In the present study, we explored the relationship between adiponectin and circadian rhythm disorder in AD, the effect of adiponectin on the abnormal expression of Bmal1 mRNA/protein induced by amyloid-ß protein 31-35 (Aß31-35), and the underlying mechanism of action. We found that adiponectin-knockout mice exhibited amyloid-ß deposition, circadian rhythm disorders and abnormal expression of Bmal1. Adiponectin ameliorated the abnormal expression of the Bmal1 mRNA/protein caused by Aß31-35 by inhibiting the activity of glycogen synthase kinase 3ß (GSK3ß). These results suggest that adiponectin deficiency could induce circadian rhythm disorders and abnormal expression of the Bmal1 mRNA/protein, whilst exogenous administration of adiponectin may improve Aß31-35-induced abnormal expression of Bmal1 by inhibiting the activity of GSK3ß, thus providing a novel idea for the treatment of AD.

Comparison of Anticoagulation Strategies in Patients Requiring Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Heparin Versus Bivalirudin.

OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a life-sustaining therapy for severe respiratory failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits require systemic anticoagulation that creates a delicate balance between circuit-related thrombosis and bleeding-related complications. Although unfractionated heparin is most widely used anticoagulant, alternative agents such as bivalirudin have been used. We sought to compare extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombosis and bleeding-related outcomes in respiratory failure patients receiving either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, cardiothoracic ICU. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who were maintained on anticoagulation between 2013 and 2020. INTERNVENTIONS: IV bivalirudin or IV unfractionated heparin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcomes were the presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in-circuit-related thrombotic complications and volume of blood products administered during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration. One hundred sixty-two patients receiving unfractionated heparin were compared with 133 patients receiving bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In patients receiving bivalirudin, there was an overall decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombotic complications (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in time to circuit thrombosis (p = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression found that heparin was associated with a significant increase in risk of clots (Exp[B] = 2.31, p = 0.001). Patients who received bivalirudin received significantly less volume of packed RBCs, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusion (p < 0.001 for each). There was a significant decrease in the number major bleeding events in patients receiving bivalirudin, 40.7% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experienced a decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit-related thrombotic events as well as a significant decrease in volume of blood products administered.

A multicenter open-label randomized phase II trial of paclitaxel plus EP-100, a novel LHRH receptor-targeted, membrane-disrupting peptide, versus paclitaxel alone for refractory or recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This randomized open-label phase II study evaluated the safety and clinical activity of EP-100 plus weekly paclitaxel in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer expressing positive LHRH receptor. METHODS: In a limited "run-in" dose escalation phase for EP-100, six patients were treated with ascending dose levels (13 mg/m2, 20 mg/m2, 30 mg/m2). In the randomized phase, patients received weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously) plus twice weekly EP-100 (30 mg/m2 intravenously; combination arm) or weekly paclitaxel alone (80 mg/m2 intravenously; paclitaxel arm). The primary study endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Forty-four patients were then randomized to either the experimental combination arm (n = 23) or the standard of care paclitaxel monotherapy arm (n = 21). The ORR was 35% (95%CI 16%-57%) for the combination arm and 33% (95% CI 15%-57%) for the paclitaxel arm. An interesting observation from an unplanned analysis was that a subset of patients with target liver lesions showed a greater overall response rate to the combination (69%) compared to paclitaxel alone (16%). The frequency of treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events was similar between treatment arms: 48% vs 43% for the combination and paclitaxel arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ORR in the EP-100 combination arm was similar to that in the group treated with paclitaxel alone; however, a subset of patients with liver metastases appeared to benefit from the combination. The addition of EP-100 did not appear to augment the adverse event profile of paclitaxel and was well tolerated.

A Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials Evaluating the Impact of Bivalirudin-based Anticoagulation for Primary Percutaneous Coronary on Long-Term Mortality.

ABSTRACT: Bivalirudin and heparin are the principal anticoagulants used during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients experiencing ST-elevation myocardial infarctions. Based on previous meta-analyses, bivalirudin improves 30-day mortality rates compared with heparin, especially when vascular access is predominantly femoral. However, no meta-analysis has yet reported whether this mortality benefit with bivalirudin persists beyond 30 days. Scientific databases and websites were searched to find randomized controlled trials, and risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effect models. Data from 4 trials were analyzed. Compared with heparin ± glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, bivalirudin decreased all-cause mortality [RR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-0.94; P = 0.008], cardiac mortality (RR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88; P = 0.001), and net adverse clinical events (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.72-0.97; P = 0.016) at 1 year. In conclusion, a bivalirudin-based anticoagulation strategy during primary percutaneous coronary intervention significantly decreases the 1-year risks for all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and net adverse clinical events compared with heparin ± glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor.