Control of respiratory drive by extracorporeal CO2 removal in acute exacerbation of COPD breathing on non-invasive NAVA.

BACKGROUND: Veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal (vv-ECCO2R) and non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NIV-NAVA) are two promising techniques which may prevent complications related to prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. METHODS: A physiological study of the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) response was conducted with varying degrees of extracorporeal CO2 removal to control the respiratory drive in patients with severe acute exacerbation of COPD breathing on NIV-NAVA. RESULTS: Twenty COPD patients (SAPS II 37 ± 5.6, age 57 ± 9 years) treated with vv-ECCO2R and supported by NIV-NAVA were studied during stepwise weaning of vv-ECCO2R. Based on dyspnea, tolerance, and blood gases, weaning from vv-ECCO2R was successful in 12 and failed in eight patients. Respiratory drive (measured via the Edi) increased to 19 ± 10 µV vs. 56 ± 20 µV in the successful and unsuccessful weaning groups, respectively, resulting in all patients keeping their CO2 and pH values stable. Edi was the best predictor for vv-ECCO2R weaning failure (ROC analysis AUC 0.95), whereas respiratory rate, rapid shallow breathing index, and tidal volume had lower predictive values. Eventually, 19 patients were discharged home, while one patient died. Mortality at 90 days and 180 days was 15 and 25%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time the usefulness of the Edi signal to monitor and guide patients with severe acute exacerbation of COPD on vv-ECCO2R and NIV-NAVA. The Edi during vv-ECCO2R weaning was found to be the best predictor of tolerance to removing vv-ECCO2R.

Patient Demographics and Extracorporeal Membranous Oxygenation (ECMO)-Related Complications Associated With Survival to Discharge or 30-Day Survival in Adult Patients Receiving Venoarterial (VA) and Venovenous (VV) ECMO in a Quaternary Care Urban Center.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate how a multitude of patient demographics and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO)-related complications affect 30-day survival or survival to discharge. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Urban university hospital, quaternary care center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients who underwent ECMO circulatory support from January 2012 to May 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Date-based data extraction, univariate and multivariate regression analysis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The hospital database contained complete data for 235 adult patients who received venoarterial ECMO (74.04 %) and venovenous ECMO (25.96 %); 106 patients (45.11%) survived. The independent predictors significant in the odds of in-hospital mortality in a multiregression model were age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.028, p = 0.008), extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) after unsuccessful high-quality CPR (OR = 7.93, p =0.002), cardiogenic shock as the primary indication for circulatory support (OR = 2.58, p = 0.02), acute kidney injury (AKI) before ECMO initiation (OR = 7.53, p < 0.001), time spent on ECMO in days (OR = 1.08, p = 0.03), and limb ischemia (OR = 3.18, p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The most significant findings of advancing age, time spent on ECMO, AKI, ECMO use in the setting of cardiogenic shock, ECPR, and limb ischemia as a complication of ECMO all independently increase the odds of in-hospital and 30-day mortality. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first to demonstrate a significant relationship between limb ischemia and mortality.

Effect of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation on the New Vancomycin Dosing Regimen in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dosing regimen of vancomycin for critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) remains controversial, not to mention those with concurrent use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We aimed to determine if a new dosing regimen can achieve the target vancomycin trough concentration (Ctrough) of 10-20 mcg/mL in patients receiving CVVH with or without ECMO. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study by enrolling patients who received vancomycin while undergoing CVVH. The vancomycin dosing regimen was 15-20 mg/kg as the loading dose and 7.5 mg/kg every 12 hours as the maintenance doses. Serum concentration was determined after at least 4 doses of vancomycin were given. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients were enrolled, of which 21 were also on ECMO. The ultrafiltration rate of CVVH was 30.6 ± 5.5 mL·kg·h with the Ctrough of 14.7 ± 3.5 mcg/mL. Ctrough was within the target range in 82% of patients. All CVVH-only patients achieved the target concentration, whereas only 76.2% of those with concurrent ECMO did (P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: All patients receiving CVVH achieved the target Ctrough with this new dosing regimen, but those with concurrent ECMO did not. Ctrough must be more closely monitored in patients using ECMO simultaneously.

Extracorporeal techniques for the treatment of critically ill patients with sepsis beyond conventional blood purification therapy: the promises and the pitfalls.

Sepsis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. It is characterized by a dysregulated immune response to infections that results in life-threatening organ dysfunction and even death. Bacterial cell wall components (endotoxin or lipopolysaccharide), known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), as well as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) released by host injured cells, are well-recognized triggers resulting in the elevation of both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Understanding this complex pathophysiology has led to the development of therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring a balanced immune response by eliminating/deactivating these inflammatory mediators. Different extracorporeal techniques have been studied in recent years in the hope of maximizing the effect of renal replacement therapy in modulating the exaggerated host inflammatory response, including the use of high volume hemofiltration (HVHF), high cut-off (HCO) membranes, adsorption alone, and coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA). These strategies are not widely utilized in practice, depending on resources and local expertise. The literature examining their use in septic patients is growing, but the evidence to support their use at this stage is considered of low level. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, clinical applications, and associated side effects of these techniques.

Rapid calcium loss may cause arrhythmia in hemofiltration with regional citrate anticoagulation: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Renal replacement therapy (RRT) with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is an important therapeutic approach for refractory hypercalcemia complicated with renal failure. However, RCA has the potential to induce arrhythmia caused by rapid calcium loss. We report a case of arrhythmia associated with rapid calcium loss during RCA-RRT. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man with hypercalcemia, primary hyperparathyroidism, and acute kidney injury was treated by predilutional-RCA-hemofiltration at a rate of 4.3 L/h. The effect of lowering serum calcium was unsatisfactory despite reducing calcium substitution gradually from 5.3 to 2.2 mmol/h in the first 8-h session of RCA-hemofiltration. New-onset sinus tachycardia with a prolonged QT interval occurred when calcium substitution was infused at rate of 1.1 mmol/h after 15 min of starting the second RCA-hemofiltration session (estimated net calcium loss was 7.54 mmol/h). When the calcium substitution was increased to usual rate of 5.6 mmol/h, the arrhythmia disappeared after 2 min. Arrhythmia did not recur when the calcium substitution rate was 2.2 mmol/h during the third session (estimated net calcium loss was 6.44 mmol/L). After the third RCA-hemofiltration session, the patient underwent parathyroidectomy and serum calcium returned to normal. CONCLUSIONS: This case indicated that rapid calcium loss may cause arrhythmia in RCA-hemofiltration, and the rate of net calcium loss should be limited below a threshold value to prevent similar adverse effect during RCA-RRT.

Bleeding Complications Associated With Percutaneous Tracheostomy Insertion in Patients Supported With Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen Support: A 10-Year Institutional Experience.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the bleeding complications associated with percutaneous tracheostomy while a patient is receiving venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygen (VV ECMO) support. DESIGN: Retrospective, observational analysis. SETTING: Single-center, tertiary, academic institution. PARTICIPANTS: All consecutive patients on VV ECMO over a 10 year-period undergoing percutaneous tracheostomy. INTERVENTIONS: Percutaneous tracheostomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fifty percutaneous tracheostomies were performed in patients requiring VV ECMO support over the 10-year period. The authors observed a 40% incidence of bleeding, with 32% of these incidences characterized as minor (self-limiting, localized stomal ooze) and 8% characterized as significant (necessitating surgical control and frequent packing or accompanied by a decrease in hemoglobin >20%). CONCLUSIONS: Bleeding is associated with percutaneous tracheostomy and is self-limiting in the majority of patients.

Renal failure requiring dialysis complicating slow continuous ultrafiltration in acute heart failure: importance of systolic perfusion pressure.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have raised concerns regarding renal outcomes in patients with decompensated acute heart failure (HF) treated with slow continuous ultrafiltration (SCUF). The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for renal failure (RF) requiring dialysis in patients with acute HF initiated on SCUF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 63 consecutive patients with acute HF who required SCUF because of congestion refractory to hemodynamically guided intensive medical therapy. Median serum creatinine at SCUF initiation was higher in patients who developed RF requiring dialysis [2.5 (interquartile range 1.8-3.3) vs 1.6 (1.2-2.3) mg/dL; P < .001]. Weight loss within 48 hours of SCUF initiation was larger in patients who did not progress to RF [-6 (-10 to -2) vs -4 (-6 to -2) kg; P = .03]. Systolic perfusion pressure had a nonlinear association with RF requiring dialysis, with a threshold effect noted at 90 mm Hg. Twelve-month mortality in patients who were moved to dialysis versus those who were not was 95% versus 35%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute HF initiated on SCUF, onset of RF requiring dialysis is associated with high mortality. Systolic perfusion pressure which incorporates both perfusion and venous congestion parameters may present a modifiable risk factor for worsening RF during SCUF in acute HF patients.

The effect of continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy on the outcome of critically ill patients with acute renal failure (CONVINT): a prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Acute renal failure (ARF) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) occurs frequently in ICU patients and significantly affects mortality rates. Previously, few large clinical trials investigated the impact of RRT modalities on patient outcomes. Here we investigated the effect of two major RRT strategies (intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH)) on mortality and renal-related outcome measures. METHODS: This single-center prospective randomized controlled trial ("CONVINT") included 252 critically ill patients (159 male; mean age, 61.5 ± 13.9 years; Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, 28.6 ± 8.8) with dialysis-dependent ARF treated in the ICUs of a tertiary care academic center. Patients were randomized to receive either daily IHD or CVVH. The primary outcome measure was survival at 14 days after the end of RRT. Secondary outcome measures included 30-day-, intensive care unit-, and intrahospital mortality, as well as course of disease severity/biomarkers and need for organ-support therapy. RESULTS: At baseline, no differences in disease severity, distributions of age and gender, or suspected reasons for acute renal failure were observed. Survival rates at 14 days after RRT were 39.5% (IHD) versus 43.9% (CVVH) (odds ratio (OR), 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49 to 1.41; P = 0.50). 14-day-, 30-day, and all-cause intrahospital mortality rates were not different between the two groups (all P > 0.5). No differences were observed in days on RRT, vasopressor days, days on ventilator, or ICU-/intrahospital length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: In a monocentric RCT, we observed no statistically significant differences between the investigated treatment modalities regarding mortality, renal-related outcome measures, or survival at 14 days after RRT. Our findings add to mounting data demonstrating that intermittent and continuous RRTs may be considered equivalent approaches for critically ill patients with dialysis-dependent acute renal failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01228123, clinicaltrials.gov.

The evolution of pediatric continuous renal replacement therapy.

The provision of continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) to small children has generally required the adaptation of adult machines and modified operational characteristics. CRRT prescription for younger and smaller children versus adults differs significantly due to problems concerning the extracorporeal blood volume, the need for circuit blood priming, and the adaptation of machines designed for adult-sized patients. Moreover, the provision of renal replacement therapy to infants and neonates presents a unique problem: no more than 10-15% of their blood volume should be removed by the extracorporeal circuit to prevent hypotension and anemia. In 2012, a dedicated machine, i.e. the Cardio-Renal, Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine (CARPEDIEM), was developed and launched the 'fitted era' for pediatric CRRT. In this review, we analyze how CRRT techniques have evolved for pediatric application and describe the first in vivo application of the CARPEDIEM for the safe and efficacious provision of CRRT to infants.

Worsening renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure treated with ultrafiltration: predictors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Ultrafiltration (UF) is used to treat patients with diuretic-resistant acute decompensated heart failure. The aim of this study was to identify predictors and the effect of worsening renal failure (WRF) on mortality in patients treated with UF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Based on changes in serum creatinine, 99 patients treated with UF were divided into WRF and control groups. Overall creatinine increased from 1.9 ± 9.7 to 2.2 ± 2.0 mg/dL (P < .001), and WRF developed in 41% of the subjects. The peak UF rate was higher in the WRF group in univariate analysis (174 ± 45 vs 144 ± 42 mL/h; P = .03). Based on multivariate analysis, aldosterone antagonist treatment (odds ratio [OR] 3.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-13.46, P = .04), heart rate ≤65 beats/min (OR 6.03, 95% CI 1.48-48.42; P = .03), and E/E' ≥15 (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.26-17.55; P = .04) at hospital admission were associated with WRF. Patients with baseline glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ≤60 mg/dL who developed WRF during UF had a 75% 1-year mortality rate. CONCLUSIONS: WRF occurred frequently during UF. Increased LV filling pressures, lower heart rate, and treatment with aldosterone antagonist at hospital admission can identify patients at increased risk for WRF. Patients with baseline GFR ≤60 mg/dL and WRF during UF have an extremely high 1-year mortality rate.

How acute kidney injury is investigated and managed in UK intensive care units--a survey of current practice.

BACKGROUND: Optimal management of acute kidney injury (AKI) remains controversial, particularly with respect to acutely unwell patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). This is likely to be attributable to the currently poor evidence base. Attempts to introduce guidance and consistency have been made over recent years, such as the AKI Network (AKIN) staging system and, in the UK, recommendations from the 2009 National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD) report into AKI. We wished to ascertain how AKI is investigated and managed in intensive care units in the UK, and whether these recent initiatives have made any difference to clinical practice. METHODS: This is an online survey of all general adult UK ICUs between December 2009 and May 2010. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-eight out of two hundred and thirty-three units (80%) started the survey; 167 (72%) completed it. Only 19.2% of respondents routinely use AKIN or Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE) criteria for diagnosis and staging of AKI. A nephrologist is never or rarely consulted about patients with AKI in over 40% of the units. Only 46.4% have 24-h access to a renal ultrasound service. Continuous venovenous haemofiltration (CVVH) is the most commonly used form of renal replacement therapy (RRT) but intermittent haemodialysis (IHD) is used infrequently. Continuous RRTs (CRRTs) are managed almost exclusively by intensivists, whereas IHD is managed predominantly by nephrologists. The most frequently used criteria for initiating RRT are hyperkalaemia, fluid overload and pH. Most units have a standard RRT protocol and 35 mL/kg/h is the most frequently prescribed dose of CVVH. Only 51% of the units assess the delivered dose of RRT. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variation exists in the investigation and management of AKI in UK ICUs. Despite increasing recognition of the importance of AKI, few ICUs are aware of RIFLE and AKIN criteria.

Hypophosphatemia during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration is associated with mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether hypophosphatemia during continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) is associated with the global outcome of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: 760 patients diagnosed with AKI and had received CVVH therapy were retrospectively recruited. Death during the 28-day period and survival at 28 days after initiation of CVVH were used as endpoints. Demographic and clinical data including serum phosphorus levels were recorded along with clinical outcome. Hypophosphatemia was defined according to the colorimetric method as serum phosphorus levels < 0.81 mmol/L (2.5 mg/dL), and severe hypophosphatemia was defined as serum phosphorus levels < 0.32 mmol/L (1 mg/dL). The ratio of CVVH therapy days with hypophosphatemia over total CVVH therapy days was calculated to reflect the persistence of hypophosphatemia. RESULTS: The Cox proportional hazard survival model analysis indicated that the incidence of hypophosphatemia or even severe hypophosphatemia was not associated with 28-day mortality independently (p = 0.700). Further analysis with the sub-cohort of patients who had developed hypophosphatemia during the CVVH therapy period indicated that the mean ratio of CVVH therapy days with hypophosphatemia over total CVVH therapy days was 0.58, and the ratio independently associated with the global outcome. Compared with the patients with low ratio (< 0.58), those with high ratio (≥ 0.58) conferred a 1.451-fold increase in 28-day mortality rate (95% CI 1.103-1.910, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Hypophosphatemia during CVVH associated with the global clinical outcome of critically ill patients with AKI. The ratio of CVVH therapy days with hypophosphatemia over total CVVH therapy days was independently associated with the 28-day mortality, and high ratio conferred higher mortality rate.

Beyond dialysis: current and emerging blood purification techniques.

Extracorporeal blood purification using various techniques and hardware is a major part of the modern day practice of clinical nephrology. Although the various modalities of hemodialysis and hemofiltration are the most commonly used extracorporeal therapies in clinical nephrology, blood purification using other techniques have become necessary to remove pathogenic, toxic, or waste substances not easily cleared by hemodialysis or hemofiltration due to factors such as molecular size, protein binding, and lipid solubility. The following review is an up to date summary of extracorporeal therapies, beyond hemodialysis and hemofiltration, in current clinical use as practiced by nephrologists and others in the United States and beyond. This comprises therapeutic apheresis (plasma exchange and cytapheresis), plasma adsorption, hemoperfusion, and the bio-artificial devices.

Isolated ultrafiltration in heart failure patients.

Most heart failure hospitalizations are due to volume overload, which contributes to disease progression. Heart failure decompensation is typically treated with intravenous diuretics, which are of limited efficacy especially in patients with underlying chronic kidney disease. Since the introduction of hemodialysis, ultrafiltration has been used to remove excess body fluid. Newer, simplified isolated ultrafiltration devices make ultrafiltration feasible at most hospitals and in less acute care settings. Veno-venous ultrafiltration is characterized by transport of solutes and water across a semipermeable membrane in response to a transmembrane pressure gradient generated by a peristaltic pump. Monitoring of ultrafiltration requires a combination of clinical and biomarkers values. Hemodynamic instability due to overaggressive fluid removal must be avoided. Based on recent clinical trials, practice guidelines state that ultrafiltration is reasonable for patients with congestion refractory to medical therapy (Class IIa, Level of Evidence B). Unanswered questions regarding ultrafiltration in heart failure patients include optimal fluid removal rates, effect on long-term survival, and cost.

Current and future role of ultrafiltration in CRS.

Ultrafiltration has been used in patients with decompensated HF and volume overload refractory to diuretics. Criteria for the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in the ICU are oliguria, anuria, urea, creatinine, Na and K blood concentrations, pulmonary edema unresponsive to diuretics, uncompensated metabolic acidosis, temperature >40°C, uremic complication, and overdose with a dialyzable toxin. Moreover, the treatment of acute renal failure requires a different style and philosophy from renal replacement therapy for chronic renal failure. The degree and the location of renal lesion, the entity, the gravity of the concomitant acute or chronic cardiac damage, the weight of a trauma, surgical stress, or septic complication they determine a variability of clinical picture that can modify the prescription and the timing of RRT and the monitoring technology. In the presence of cardiac alterations due to a condition of chronic heart failure, all the acute events contribute to the progression of the cardiac insufficiency and the patient will always have as a result an ulterior reduction in the cardiac function. It derives the opportunity to put more precociously in action everything of it how much serves for a real cardioprotection. A valid hemodynamic monitoring is essential to reach the lowest possible value of pressure of left ventricular filling, without reduction in the cardiac output, increase in the cardiac frequency or the ulterior activation of the neurohormones. An early ultrafiltration allows a more easy control of the circulating mass but also an effective neurohormonal purification and of all the inflammation mediators.

Ultrafiltration is associated with fewer rehospitalizations than continuous diuretic infusion in patients with decompensated heart failure: results from UNLOAD.

BACKGROUND: Compare outcomes of ultrafiltration (UF) versus standard intravenous (IV) diuretics by continuous infusion or bolus injection in volume overloaded heart failure (HF) patients. In the Ultrafiltration versus Intravenous Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated heart Failure (UNLOAD) study, UF produced greater fluid reduction and fewer HF rehospitalizations than IV diuretics in 200 hospitalized HF patients. Outcomes may be due to greater fluid removal, but UF removes more sodium/unit volume than diuretics. METHODS AND RESULTS: Outcomes of 100 patients randomized to UF were compared with those of patients randomized to standard IV diuretic therapy with continuous infusion (32) or bolus injections (68). Choice of diuretic therapy was by the treating physician. Forty-eight hour weight loss (kg): 5.0 +/- 3.1 UF, 3.6 +/- 3.5 continuous infusion, and 2.9 +/- 3.5 bolus diuretics (P = .001 UF versus bolus diuretic; P > .05 for the other comparisons). Net fluid loss (L): 4.6 +/- 2.6 UF, 3.9 +/- 2.7 continuous infusion, and 3.1 +/- 2.6 bolus diuretics (P < .001 UF versus bolus diuretic; P > .05 for the other comparisons). At 90 days, rehospitalizations plus unscheduled visits for HF/patient (rehospitalization equivalents) were fewer in UF group (0.65 +/- 1.36) than in continuous infusion (2.29 +/- 3.23; P = .016 versus UF) and bolus diuretics (1.31 +/- 1.87; P = .050 versus UF) groups. No serum creatinine differences occurred between groups up to 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar fluid loss with UF and continuous diuretic infusion, fewer HF rehospitalizations equivalents occurred only with UF. Removal of isotonic fluid by UF compared with hypotonic urine by diuretics more effectively reduces total body sodium in congested HF patients.

High-volume hemofiltration in sepsis and SIRS: current concepts and future prospects.

In recent years, a number of techniques have been studied and developed in the field of renal replacement therapy in the septic patient. Manipulation of ultrafiltrate dose, membrane porosity, mode of clearance, and combinations of techniques have yielded promising findings. However, at present, conclusive evidence based on well-designed, randomized controlled trials remains scarce, limiting the practical implementation of many techniques in daily practice outside the context of a study. From the few well-designed and documented studies that we have so far, it is safe to say that optimalization of delivered dose in renal replacement therapy has a proven positive effect. An ultrafiltration rate between 35 and 45 ml/kg/h, with adjustment for predilution and down time, can be recommended for the septic patient until other data are available. The results of further dose outcome studies with higher ultrafiltration rates will likely be the stepping stone to further improvements in daily clinical practice.

Continuous hemofiltration in 2009: what is new for clinicians regarding pathophysiology, preferred technique and recommended dose?

In the last years, publications have questioned the classical dose of 35 ml/kg, but are those studies strong enough in terms of scientific power in order to change our practice? We will try to settle some recommendations for clinicians. Manipulation of dose, porosity, and combinations have yielded promising findings. However, conclusive evidence based on randomized trials remains scarce, limiting the practical implementation in daily practice. From the few designed studies, it is safe to say that optimization of delivered dose has a proven positive effect. An ultrafiltration rate of around 35 ml/kg/h, with adjustment for predilution, can be recommended for the septic patient. Recent studies do not have enough power to change this recommendation in view of its shortcomings. Finally the recommendation is to keep going with a continuous technique, a pure continuous veno-venous hemofiltration mode, and at a dose of 35 ml/kg/h while waiting for other studies to be published.

Ultrafiltration for the management of acute decompensated heart failure.

Heart failure is a major public health problem and is increasing in incidence throughout the industrialized world. Despite recent advances in pharmacotherapy, the overall mortality remains high and largely unchanged. Ultrafiltration has received increased attention in the treatment of acute decompensated congestive heart failure, and recent clinical trials suggest its usefulness in removing volume while preserving renal function. This review will focus on the background of ultrafiltration in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure as well as the current evidence regarding its efficacy and safety.

Outcomes of volume-overloaded cardiovascular patients treated with ultrafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Ultrafiltration (UF) can rapidly and predictably remove extracellular and intravascular fluid volume. To date, assessment of UF in patients with cardiovascular disease has been confined to short- and medium-term studies in patients with a principal diagnosis of acute heart failure. METHODS: In-hospital and long-term outcomes were reviewed from consecutive patients with cardiovascular disorders and recognized pulmonary and systemic volume overload treated with a simplified UF system with the capability for peripheral venovenous access. Trained abstractors reviewed both paper and electronic medical records. Patients with a principal diagnosis of heart failure versus other primary hospital discharge diagnoses were identified according to International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision standards by independent coders. RESULTS: For a period of 43 months, 100 patients (76 male/24 female, 65 +/- 14.0 years of age, systolic dysfunction 64%) were treated with UF during 130 hospitalizations. Baseline systolic blood pressure was 119 +/- 23 mm Hg. Before UF, 53% were receiving intravenous vasoactive therapy. By using UF, 7.1 +/- 3.9 L of ultrafiltrate were removed during 2.0 +/- 1.2 treatments per hospitalization. Baseline creatinine was 1.8 +/- 0.8 and 1.9 +/- 1.2 (not significant) at discharge. Of the 15 in-hospital deaths, 14 occurred during the initial hospitalization. Left ventricular dysfunction was related to 13 (87%) of the 15 deaths; no deaths were related to UF use. In hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis of heart failure (n = 79), in-hospital mortality was 7.6% compared with an ADHERE risk tree estimated mortality of 7.5%. Multivariate logistic regression identified a trend for decreased systolic blood pressure to predict patient initial hospitalization mortality (P = .06). Kaplan-Meier survivals for all patients were 71% at 1 year and 67% at 2 years. Cox regression found decreased systolic blood pressure as a predictor of long-term mortality (P = .025). Total volume of ultrafiltrate removed, ejection fraction, history of coronary artery disease, creatinine clearance, gender, age, and principal diagnosis of heart failure were not significantly associated with long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: This series extends the spectrum of patients previously reported to be treated with UF. Despite marked volume overload, UF-treated patients with a principal diagnosis of heart failure had inpatient outcomes similar to the ADHERE registry. UF should be considered for a broad range of patients who present with volume overload.