Bulevirtide Combined with Pegylated Interferon for Chronic Hepatitis D.

BACKGROUND: In a phase 3 trial, bulevirtide monotherapy led to a virologic response in patients with chronic hepatitis D. Pegylated interferon (peginterferon) alfa-2a is recommended by guidelines as an off-label treatment for this disease. The role of combination therapy with bulevirtide and peginterferon alfa-2a, particularly with regard to finite treatment, is unclear. METHODS: In this phase 2b, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive peginterferon alfa-2a alone (180 µg per week) for 48 weeks; bulevirtide at a daily dose of 2 mg or 10 mg plus peginterferon alfa-2a (180 µg per week) for 48 weeks, followed by the same daily dose of bulevirtide for 48 weeks; or bulevirtide at a daily dose of 10 mg alone for 96 weeks. All the patients were followed for 48 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary end point was an undetectable level of hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. The primary comparison was between the 10-mg bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a group and the 10-mg bulevirtide monotherapy group. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients received peginterferon alfa-2a alone, 50 received 2 mg and 50 received 10 mg of bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a, and 50 received 10 mg of bulevirtide monotherapy. At 24 weeks after the end of treatment, HDV RNA was undetectable in 17% of the patients in the peginterferon alfa-2a group, in 32% of those in the 2-mg bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a group, in 46% of those in the 10-mg bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a group, and in 12% of those in the 10-mg bulevirtide group. For the primary comparison, the between-group difference was 34 percentage points (95% confidence interval, 15 to 50; P<0.001). At 48 weeks after the end of treatment, HDV RNA was undetectable in 25% of the patients in the peginterferon alfa-2a group, in 26% of those in the 2-mg bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a group, in 46% of those in the 10-mg bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a group, and in 12% of those in the 10-mg bulevirtide group. The most frequent adverse events were leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. The majority of adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 in severity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of 10-mg bulevirtide plus peginterferon alfa-2a was superior to bulevirtide monotherapy with regard to an undetectable HDV RNA level at 24 weeks after the end of treatment. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; MYR 204 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03852433.).

A Phase 3, Randomized Trial of Bulevirtide in Chronic Hepatitis D.

BACKGROUND: Coinfection with hepatitis D virus (HDV) accelerates the progression of liver disease associated with chronic hepatitis B. Bulevirtide inhibits the entry of HDV into hepatocytes. METHODS: In this ongoing phase 3 trial, patients with chronic hepatitis D, with or without compensated cirrhosis, were randomly assigned, in a 1:1:1 ratio, to receive bulevirtide subcutaneously at 2 mg per day (2-mg group) or 10 mg per day (10-mg group) for 144 weeks or to receive no treatment for 48 weeks followed by bulevirtide subcutaneously at 10 mg per day for 96 weeks (control group). Patients will complete 96 weeks of additional follow-up after the end of treatment. The primary end point was a combined response at week 48 of an undetectable HDV RNA level, or a level that decreased by at least 2 log10 IU per milliliter from baseline, and normalization of the alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. The key secondary end point was an undetectable HDV RNA level at week 48, in a comparison between the 2-mg group and the 10-mg group. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were assigned to the 2-mg group, 50 to the 10-mg group, and 51 to the control group. A primary end-point response occurred in 45% of patients in the 2-mg group, 48% in the 10-mg group, and 2% in the control group (P<0.001 for the comparison of each dose group with the control group). The HDV RNA level at week 48 was undetectable in 12% of patients in the 2-mg group and in 20% in the 10-mg group (P = 0.41). The ALT level normalized in 12% of patients in the control group, 51% in the 2-mg group (difference from control, 39 percentage points [95% confidence interval {CI}, 20 to 56]), and 56% in the 10-mg group (difference from control, 44 percentage points [95% CI, 26 to 60]). Loss of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) or an HBsAg level that decreased by at least 1 log10 IU per milliliter did not occur in the bulevirtide groups by week 48. Headache, pruritus, fatigue, eosinophilia, injection-site reactions, upper abdominal pain, arthralgia, and asthenia were more common in the 2-mg and 10-mg groups combined than in the control group. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Dose-dependent increases in bile acid levels were noted in the 2-mg and 10-mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: After 48 weeks of bulevirtide treatment, HDV RNA and ALT levels were reduced in patients with chronic hepatitis D. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; MYR 301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03852719.).

Safety and efficacy of off-label bulevirtide monotherapy in patients with HDV with decompensated Child-B cirrhosis-A real-world case series.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic hepatitis D is the most debilitating form of viral hepatitis frequently progressing to cirrhosis and subsequent decompensation. However, the HDV entry inhibitor bulevirtide is only approved for antiviral treatment of patients with compensated disease. We aimed for the analysis of real-world data on the off-label use of bulevirtide in the setting of decompensated liver cirrhosis. APPROACH AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study in patients with HDV with decompensated liver disease at German, Austrian, and Italian centers. We included 19 patients (47% male, mean age: 51 years) with liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh B. The median MELD score was 12 (range 9-17) at treatment initiation. The median observation period was 41 weeks. Virologic response was achieved in 74% and normal alanine aminotransferase was observed in 74%. The combined response was achieved by 42%. The most relevant adverse events included self-limited alanine aminotransferase flares, an asymptomatic increase in bile acids, and the need for liver transplantation. Despite bile acid increases, adverse events were considered unrelated. Clinical and laboratory improvement from Child-Pugh B to A occurred in 47% (n = 9/19). Improvements in the amount of ascites were observed in 58% of the patients initially presenting with ascites (n = 7/12). CONCLUSIONS: This report on off-label bulevirtide treatment in patients with decompensated HDV cirrhosis shows similar virologic and biochemical response rates as observed in compensated liver disease. Significant improvements were observed in surrogates of hepatic function and portal hypertension. However, this improvement was not seen in all patients. Controlled trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of bulevirtide in decompensated HDV cirrhosis.

JAK1 promotes HDV replication and is a potential target for antiviral therapy.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic co-infection with HBV and HDV leads to the most aggressive form of chronic viral hepatitis. To date, no treatment induces efficient viral clearance, and a better characterization of virus-host interactions is required to develop new therapeutic strategies. METHODS: Using loss-of-function strategies, we validated the unexpected proviral activity of Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) - a key player in innate immunity - in the HDV life cycle and determined its mechanism of action on HDV through various functional analyses including co-immunoprecipitation assays. RESULTS: We confirmed the key role of JAK1 kinase activity in HDV infection. Moreover, our results suggest that JAK1 inhibition is associated with a modulation of ERK1/2 activation and S-HDAg phosphorylation, which is crucial for viral replication. Finally, we showed that FDA-approved JAK1-specific inhibitors are efficient antivirals in relevant in vitro models including primary human hepatocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, we uncovered JAK1 as a key host factor for HDV replication and a potential target for new antiviral treatment. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Chronic hepatitis D is the most aggressive form of chronic viral hepatitis. As no curative treatment is currently available, new therapeutic strategies based on host-targeting agents are urgently needed. Here, using loss-of-function strategies, we uncover an unexpected interaction between JAK1, a major player in the innate antiviral response, and HDV infection. We demonstrated that JAK1 kinase activity is crucial for both the phosphorylation of the delta antigen and the replication of the virus. By demonstrating the antiviral potential of several FDA-approved JAK1 inhibitors, our results could pave the way for the development of innovative therapeutic strategies to tackle this global health threat.

Bulevirtide monotherapy in patients with chronic HDV: Efficacy and safety results through week 96 from a phase III randomized trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bulevirtide (BLV), a first-in-class entry inhibitor, is approved in Europe for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD). BLV monotherapy was superior to delayed treatment at week (W) 48, the primary efficacy endpoint, in the MYR301 study (NCT03852719). Here, we assessed if continued BLV therapy until W96 would improve virologic and biochemical response rates, particularly among patients who did not achieve virologic response at W24. METHODS: In this ongoing, open-label, randomized phase III study, patients with CHD (N = 150) were randomized (1:1:1) to treatment with BLV 2 mg/day (n = 49) or 10 mg/day (n = 50), each for 144 weeks, or to delayed treatment for 48 weeks followed by BLV 10 mg/day for 96 weeks (n = 51). Combined response was defined as undetectable hepatitis delta virus (HDV) RNA or a decrease in HDV RNA by ≥2 log10 IU/ml from baseline and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization. Other endpoints included virologic response, ALT normalization, and change in HDV RNA. RESULTS: Of 150 patients, 143 (95%) completed 96 weeks of the study. Efficacy responses were maintained and/or improved between W48 and W96, with similar combined, virologic, and biochemical response rates between BLV 2 and 10 mg. Of the patients with a suboptimal early virologic response at W24, 43% of non-responders and 82% of partial responders achieved virologic response at W96. Biochemical improvement often occurred independently of virologic response. Adverse events were mostly mild, with no serious adverse events related to BLV. CONCLUSIONS: Virologic and biochemical responses were maintained and/or increased with longer term BLV therapy, including in those with suboptimal early virologic response. BLV monotherapy for CHD was safe and well tolerated through W96. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: In July 2023, bulevirtide was fully approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) in Europe based on clinical study results from up to 48 weeks of treatment. Understanding the efficacy and safety of bulevirtide over the longer term is important for healthcare providers. In this analysis, we demonstrate that bulevirtide monotherapy for 96 weeks in patients with CHD was associated with continued improvements in combined, virologic, and biochemical responses as well as liver stiffness from week 48 at both the 2 mg and 10 mg doses. Patients with suboptimal virologic responses to bulevirtide at week 24 also benefited from continued therapy, with the majority achieving virologic response or biochemical improvement by week 96. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03852719.

Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) polymorphisms may influence HDV RNA load and early response to bulevirtide.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Genetic polymorphisms in the sodium taurocholate cotransporting peptide (NTCP encoded by SLC10A1) have been described, but their role in untreated and treated patients with chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) remains unknown. Virological response (VR) to the NTCP inhibitor bulevirtide (BLV) was achieved at week 48 by >70% of patients with CHD, but nearly 15% experienced virological non-response (VNR) or partial response (PR). This study aimed to evaluate whether NTCP genetic polymorphisms affect baseline HDV RNA load and response to BLV in patients with CHD. METHODS: BLV-untreated and -treated patients were enrolled in a retrospective cross-sectional and longitudinal study. Clinical and virological characteristics were collected at baseline and up to 96 weeks in the BLV-treated patients. NTCP genetic polymorphisms were identified by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: Of the six NTCP polymorphisms studied in 209 untreated patients with CHD, carriers of the rs17556915 TT/CC (n = 142) compared to CT (n = 67) genotype presented with higher median HDV RNA levels (5.39 vs. 4.75 log10 IU/ml, p = 0.004). Of 209 patients receiving BLV monotherapy at 2 mg/day, 76 were evaluated at week 24 and 40 up to week 96. Higher mean baseline HDV RNA levels were confirmed in TT/CC (n = 43) compared to CT (n = 33) carriers (5.38 vs. 4.72 log10 IU/ml, p = 0.010). Although 24-week VR was comparable between TT/CC and CT carriers (25/43 vs. 17/33, p = 0.565), the former group presented VNR more often than PR (9/11 vs. 9/23, p = 0.02) at week 24. 7/9 TT/CC genotype carriers remained VNR at week 48 of BLV treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The NTCP rs17556915 C>T genetic polymorphisms may influence baseline HDV RNA load both in BLV-untreated and -treated patients with CHD and may contribute to identifying patients with different early virological responses to BLV. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Although several sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) genetic polymorphisms have been described, no data are available on their potential role in modifying HDV RNA load or treatment response to bulevirtide (BLV) in patients with chronic hepatitis delta (CHD). In this study, we demonstrated that patients with CHD, either treated or untreated, carrying NTCP rs17556915 TT/CC, presented higher baseline HDV RNA levels compared to those with the CT genotype. Higher HDV RNA levels in TT/CC carriers compared to CT carriers were also confirmed in patients with CHD treated with BLV monotherapy up to 96 weeks. Furthermore, carriers of TT/CC, compared to CT genotype, more frequently showed viral non-response (VNR) than partial response (PR) at week 24 of BLV treatment, and 7/9 TT/CC genotype carriers remained VNR at week 48 of BLV treatment. This is the first study demonstrating a potential role of NTCP genetic polymorphisms in influencing HDV viral load and early virological response to BLV monotherapy. Since no direct HDV resistance to BLV has been described so far, if confirmed in larger studies, the genetic polymorphisms in NTCP may help identify patients with different patterns of early virological response to BLV.

Blocking viral entry with bulevirtide reduces the number of HDV-infected hepatocytes in human liver biopsies.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bulevirtide (BLV) is a first-in-class entry inhibitor and the only approved treatment for patients chronically infected with HDV in Europe. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of BLV treatment in paired liver biopsies obtained at baseline and after 24 or 48 weeks of treatment. METHODS: We performed a combined analysis of 126 paired liver biopsies derived from three clinical trials. In the phase II clinical trial MYR202, patients with chronic hepatitis D were randomised to receive 24 weeks of BLV at 2 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg/day. Patients in MYR203 (phase II) and MYR301 (phase III) received 48 weeks of BLV at 2 mg or 10 mg/day. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy or delayed treatment served as comparators. Virological parameters and infection-related host genes were assessed by qPCR and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: At week 24, median intrahepatic HDV RNA decline from baseline was 0.9Log10 with 2 mg (n = 7), 1.1Log10 with 5 mg (n = 5) and 1.4 Log10 with 10 mg (n = 7) of BLV. At week 48, median reductions were 2.2Log10 with 2 mg (n = 27) and 2.7Log10 with 10 mg (n = 37) of BLV, while HDV RNA levels did not change in the comparator arms. Notably, a drastic decline in the number of hepatitis delta antigen-positive hepatocytes and a concomitant decrease in transcriptional levels of inflammatory chemokines and interferon-stimulated genes was determined in all BLV-treatment arms. Despite the abundance of HBsAg-positive hepatocytes, replication and covalently closed circular DNA levels of the helper virus HBV were low and remained unaffected by BLV treatment. CONCLUSION: Blocking viral entry diminishes signs of liver inflammation and promotes a strong reduction of HDV infection within the liver, thus suggesting that some patients may achieve HDV cure with long-term treatment. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: Chronic infection with HDV causes the most severe form of viral hepatitis, affecting approximately 12 million people worldwide. The entry inhibitor bulevirtide (BLV) is the only recently approved anti-HDV drug, which has proven efficacious and safe in clinical trials and real-word data. Here, we investigated paired liver biopsies at baseline and after 24 or 48 weeks of treatment from three clinical trials to understand the effect of the drug on viral and host parameters in the liver, the site of viral replication. We found that BLV treatment strongly reduces the number of HDV-infected cells and signs of liver inflammation. This data implies that blocking viral entry ameliorates liver inflammation and that prolonged treatment regimens might lead to HDV cure in some patients. This concept will guide the further development of therapeutic strategies and combination treatments for patients with CHD. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBERS: NCT03546621, NCT02888106, NCT03852719.

MiRNome Profiling of Circulating Extracellular Vesicles in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis D Undergoing Pegylated Interferon Alpha Treatment.

Micro-RNAs (miRNAs) are involved in the modulation of viral replication and host immune antiviral response. Using next-generation sequencing, we investigated the miRNome profile of circulating extracellular vesicles in 20 patients with chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection undergoing pegylated interferon alpha (Peg-IFNα) treatment. Circulating miRNAs' expression was analysed according to virologic response (i.e., HDV RNA clearance maintained at least 6 months after the end of therapy). Overall, 8 patients (40%) achieved a virologic response to Peg-IFNα treatment. At baseline, 14 miRNAs were differentially expressed between responders and non-responders; after 6 months of Peg-IFNα treatment, 7 miRNAs (miR-155-5p, miR-1246, miR-423-3p, miR-760, miR-744-5p, miR-1307-3p and miR-146a-5p) were consistently de-regulated. Among de-regulated miRNAs, miR-155-5p showed an inverse correlation with HDV RNA (at baseline: rs = -0.39, p = 0.092; at 6 months: rs = -0.53, p = 0.016) and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (at baseline: rs = -0.49, p = 0.028; at 6 months: rs-0.71, p < 0.001). At logistic regression analysis, both miR-155-5p (at baseline: OR = 4.52, p = 0.022; at 6 months: OR = 5.30, p = 0.029) and HDV RNA (at baseline: OR = 0.19, p = 0.022; at 6 months: OR = 0.38, p = 0.018) resulted significantly associated to virologic response. Considering that Peg-IFNα still has a relevant role in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis D infection, the assessment of EV miR-155-5p may represent an additional valuable tool for the management of HDV patients undergoing Peg-IFNα treatment.

Clinical trials in hepatitis D virus: Measuring success.

Chronic hepatitis D infection results in the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis but currently lacks effective treatment options. Therapy with pegylated interferon alpha is recommended for finite treatment duration by major liver societies. Still, it is plagued by low rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) and frequent relapses even if SVR is achieved. Recently, a wave of investigational therapies has come under evaluation, including bulevirtide, lonafarnib, pegylated interferon lambda, and REP-2139 creating excitement with this viral infection. However, there has been significant variability in the endpoints used to evaluate these therapeutics. One of the recently introduced endpoints is characterized by a decline in HDV RNA by 2 logs, with or without achieving an undetectable serum hepatitis D virus (HDV) RNA, as a marker of virologic response. Furthermore, this measure has been combined with alanine aminotransferase normalization, also known as a biochemical response, to formulate the primary endpoint of several late-stage studies. Per recent guidance by the US Food and Drug Administration, these should be surrogate endpoints that will ultimately portend long-term clinical benefits. These clinical benefits may include reducing the risk of progression to cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, and mortality. However, the optimal way to measure success in HDV clinical trials remains unknown and will continue to evolve.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis D with peginterferon lambda-the phase 2 LIMT-1 clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: HDV infection leads to the most aggressive form of human viral hepatitis for which there is no FDA-approved therapy. PEG IFN-lambda-1a (Lambda) has previously demonstrated a good tolerability profile in HBV and HCV patients compared to PEG IFN-alfa. The goal of Phase 2 LIMT-1 trial was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Lambda monotherapy in patients with HDV. APPROACH AND RESULTS: An open-label study of Lambda 120 or 180 mcg, administered once weekly by subcutaneous injections for 48 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of posttreatment follow-up. Thirty-three patients were allocated to Lambda 180 mcg (n=14) or 120 mcg (n=19). Baseline mean values: HDV RNA 4.1 log10 IU/mL (SD±1.4); ALT 106 IU/L (35-364); and bilirubin 0.5 mg/dL (0.2-1.2). Intention-to-treat rates of virologic response to Lambda 180 mcg and 120 mcg, 24 weeks following treatment cessation were 5 of 14(36%) and 3 of 19 (16%), respectively. The posttreatment response rate of 50% was seen in low BL viral load (≤4 log10) on 180 mcg. Common on-treatment adverse events included flu-like symptoms and elevated transaminase levels. Eight (24%) cases of hyperbilirubinemia with or without liver enzyme elevation, leading to drug discontinuation, were mainly observed in the Pakistani cohort. The clinical course was uneventful, and all responded favorably to dose reduction or discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Lambda in patients with chronic HDV may result in virologic response during and following treatment cessation. Clinical phase 3 development of Lambda for this rare and serious disease is ongoing.

Advances in hepatitis delta research: emerging insights and future directions.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) is a defective virus needing the envelope provided by hepatitis B virus (HBV) in order to enter liver cells and propagate. Chronic HDV infection is considered the most severe viral hepatitis, resulting in accelerated fibrosis progression until cirrhosis and its complications (hepatocellular carcinoma, liver decompensation) compared with HBV mono-infected patients. Off-label treatment with interferon has represented the only treatment option in the last 40 years, resulting in suboptimal virological response rates and being limited by safety issues especially in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Recently, the first HBV-HDV entry inhibitor Bulevirtide (BLV) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treatment of chronic compensated HDV. METHODS: This review summarises most recent updates on HDV epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment, with a special focus both on clinical trials and real-life studies about BLV. An overview on new HDV compounds under development is also provided. RESULTS: BLV, the HBV-HDV entry inhibitor, has shown promising safety and efficacy data in clinical trials and in real-life studies, also in patients with advanced cirrhosis and portal hypertension. However, according to EMA label treatment is currently intended long-term until clinical benefit and predictors of responses are still undefined. The potential combination with PegIFNα seems to increase virological and clinical responses. New compounds are under development or in pipeline for treatment of HDV. CONCLUSION: After more than 40 years since HDV discovery, new treatment options are currently available to provide efficient strategies for chronic hepatitis Delta.

Long-term outcome of hepatitis delta in different regions world-wide: Results of the Hepatitis Delta International Network.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Chronic hepatitis delta represents a major global health burden. Clinical features of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection vary largely between different regions worldwide. Treatment approaches are dependent on the approval status of distinct drugs and financial resources. METHODS: The Hepatitis Delta International Network (HDIN) registry involves researchers from all continents (Wranke, Liver International 2018). We here report long-term follow-up data of 648 hepatitis D patients recruited by 14 centres in 11 countries. Liver-related clinical endpoints were defined as hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy and variceal bleeding), liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma or liver-related death. RESULTS: Patient data were available from all continents but Africa: 22% from Eastern Mediterranean, 32% from Eastern Europe and Central Asia, 13% from Central and Southern Europe, 14% from South Asia (mainly Pakistan) and 19% from South America (mainly Brazil). The mean follow-up was 6.4 (.6-28) years. During follow-up, 195 patients (32%) developed a liver-related clinical event after 3.5 (±3.3) years. Liver cirrhosis at baseline and a detectable HDV RNA test during follow-up were associated with a worse clinical outcome in multivariate regression analysis while patients receiving interferon alfa-based therapies developed clinical endpoints less frequently. Patients from South Asia developed endpoints earlier and had the highest mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The HDIN registry confirms the severity of hepatitis D and provides further evidence for HDV viraemia as a main risk factor for disease progression. Hepatitis D seems to take a particularly severe course in patients born in Pakistan. There is an urgent need to extend access to antiviral therapies and to provide appropriate education about HDV infection.

Kinetics and predictive value of HBcrAg, HBV RNA and anti-HBc during bulevirtide treatment of chronic HDV-infected patients.

The entry inhibitor bulevirtide (BLV) is a new treatment option for patients with chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection and compensated liver disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the kinetic and predictive value of markers reflecting HBV cccDNA transcriptional activity and host immune response activity during BLV treatment in a real-life cohort of HDV infected patients. Levels of HDV RNA, HBV RNA, hepatitis B core related antigen (HBcrAg) and hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc) were measured in 16 patients before (BL), after three (3M) and six (6M) months of treatment with BLV. All patients received nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment. HDV RNA declined in all patients during treatment. 38% (6/16) showed ≥ 2 log HDV RNA decline from BL to 6M and 11 patients (69%) normalized ALT levels. HBV RNA levels were low and only detectable in two to four patients. HBcrAg levels declined in 75% (12/16) of patients. Median HBcrAg levels declined significantly from BL to 6M (3.75 logU/ml (IQR 2.93-4.78) vs. 3.4 logU/ml (IQR 2-4.68), p=0.002). A similar trend was shown for anti-HBc between BL and 6M. Levels of HBcrAg or anti-HBc did not differ significantly between patients with or without ≥ 2 log HDV RNA decline from BL to 6M.After 6 months treatment with BLV, levels of HBcrAg showed a significant decline, while HBV RNA and anti-HBc levels did not change. Reduction of HBV cccDNA transcriptional activity and immunological effects of antiviral treatment might explain these changes.

A phase 2 dose-finding study of lonafarnib and ritonavir with or without interferon alpha for chronic delta hepatitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Proof-of-concept studies demonstrated lonafarnib (LNF), a first-in-class oral prenylation inhibitor, efficacy in patients infected with HDV. The lonafarnib with ritonavir for HDV-2 (LOWR-2) study's aim was to identify optimal combination regimens of LNF + ritonavir (RTV) ± pegylated interferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) with efficacy and tolerability for longer-term dosing. Here we report the safety and efficacy at end of treatment for up to 24 weeks. APPROACH AND RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with chronic HDV were consecutively enrolled in an open-label, single-center, phase 2 dose-finding study. There were three main treatment groups: high-dose LNF (LNF ≥ 75 mg by mouth [po] twice daily [bid] + RTV) (n = 19, 12 weeks); all-oral low-dose LNF (LNF 25 or 50 mg po bid + RTV) (n = 24, 24 weeks), and combination low-dose LNF with PEG-IFNα (LNF 25 or 50 mg po bid + RTV + PEG-IFNα) (n = 12, 24 weeks). The primary endpoint, ≥2 log10 decline or < lower limit of quantification of HDV-RNA from baseline at end of treatment, was reached in 46% (6 of 13) and 89% (8 of 9) of patients receiving the all-oral regimen of LNF 50 mg bid + RTV, and combination regimens of LNF (25 or 50 mg bid) + RTV + PEG-IFNα, respectively. In addition, multiple patients experienced well-tolerated transient posttreatment alanine aminotransferase increases, resulting in HDV-RNA negativity and alanine aminotransferase normalization. The proportions of grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal adverse events in the high-dose versus low-dose groups were 49% (37 of 76) and only 22% (18 of 81), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LNF, boosted with low-dose RTV, is a promising all-oral therapy, and maximal efficacy is achieved with PEG-IFNα addition. The identified optimal regimens support a phase 3 study of LNF for the treatment of HDV.

Treatment endpoints for chronic hepatitis D.

Management of chronic hepatitis D (CHD) has entered a new era. In this new era, the virus entry inhibitor bulevirtide has received conditional approval as a treatment for compensated CHD. Three phase 3 studies with two new compounds are ongoing for the treatment of CHD. In this context, surrogate markers of treatment efficacy have been well defined for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (7) and chronic hepatitis C (8) but not for CHD. The aim of this review is to give a perspective on treatment endpoints in CHD. For this, we took guidance from CHB studies and tried to make suggestions which differed according to finite versus prolonged treatment durations and also took into account the different characteristics of the new compounds.

Interferon-based treatment of chronic hepatitis D.

Treatment of hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection has been based on the administration of interferon-alfa for more than three decades. First studies to treat HDV-infected patients with type 1 interferons were already performed in the 1980s. Several smaller trials and case series were reported thereafter. During the mid 2000s the use of pegylated interferons for hepatitis D was established. Since then, additional trials were performed in different countries exploring strategies to personalize treatment including extended treatment durations. The overall findings were that about one-quarter to one-third of patients benefit from interferon treatment with persistent suppression of HDV replication. However, only few patients achieve also functional cure of hepatitis B with HBsAg loss. Importantly, several studies indicate that successful interferon treatment is associated with improved clinical long-term outcomes. Still, only a proportion of patients with hepatitis D can be treated with interferons. Even though alternative treatments are currently developed, it is likely that pegylated interferon-alfa will still have an important role in the management of hepatitis D - either alone or in combination. Therefore, better biomarkers are needed to select patients with a high likelihood to benefit from interferon-based treatments. In this review we are discussing basic principles of mode of action of interferon alpha against HDV, summarize previous data on interferon treatment of hepatitis D and give an outlook on potential combinations with novel drugs currently in development.

Emerging drugs for hepatitis D.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic hepatitis delta (CHD) is the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis. Until recently, its treatment consisted of pegylated interferon alfa (pegIFN) use. AREAS COVERED: Current and new drugs for treating CHD. Virus entry inhibitor bulevirtide has received conditional approval by the European Medicines Agency. Prenylation inhibitor lonafarnib and pegIFN lambda are in phase 3 and nucleic acid polymers in phase 2 of drug development. EXPERT OPINION: Bulevirtide appears to be safe. Its antiviral efficacy increases with treatment duration. Combining bulevirtide with pegIFN has the highest antiviral efficacy short-term. The prenylation inhibitor lonafarnib prevents hepatitis D virus assembly. It is associated with dose-dependent gastrointestinal toxicity and is better used with ritonavir which increases liver lonafarnib concentrations. Lonafarnib also possesses immune modulatory properties which explains some post-treatment beneficial flare cases. Combining lonafarnib/ritonavir with pegIFN has superior antiviral efficacy. Nucleic acid polymers are amphipathic oligonucleotides whose effect appears to be a consequence of phosphorothioate modification of internucleotide linkages. These compounds led to HBsAg clearance in a sizable proportion of patients. PegIFN lambda is associated with less IFN typical side effects. In a phase 2 study it led to 6 months off treatment viral response in one third of patients.

Comparative effectiveness of seven interventions for chronic hepatitis D: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of seven major interventions [Bulevirtide (BLV), Interferon (IFN), Nucleoside analogs (NAs), BLV + IFN, BLV + NAs, IFN + NAs, and Placebo] to treat chronic hepatitis D. METHODS: We followed PRISMA-NMA guidelines, searched databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web Of Science) for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and applied STATA17.0 software to execute the meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included 14 randomized controlled trials (814 patients) comparing seven different interventions. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that: ① Sustained virological response (after 24 weeks of follow-up): Four intervention groups (BLV + IFN, IFN alone, IFN + NAs, and NAs alone) were effective (relative risk (RR) = 13.30, 95% confidence interval (Cl) [1.68,105.32], RR = 12.13, 95% Cl [1.46,101.04], RR = 5.05, 95% Cl [1.68,15.19], RR = 5.03, 95% Cl [1.66,15.20]), with no statistically significant differences between the four groups. The top three in probability rankings were: BLV + NAs, BLV + IFN, and BLV alone (surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) = 86.8%, 80.3%, and 48.4%; ② Sustained biochemical response (after 24 weeks of follow-up): BLV + IFN and IFN were superior to BLV (RR = 14.71, 95% Cl [1.14,189.07], RR = 16.67, 95% Cl [1.39,199.52]). The top three were BLV alone, BLV + NAs, and BLV + IFN (SUCRA = 86.9%,81.2%, and 64.3%). ③ Histological response: NAs were superior to BLV (RR = 2.08, 95% Cl [1.10,3.93]), whereas the difference between other treatment regimens was not statistically significant, and the top three in the probability ranking were BLV alone, BLV + NAs, and BLV + IFN (SUCRA = 75.6%, 75.6%, and 61.8%). CONCLUSIONS: IFN, IFN + BLV, and IFN + NAs were effective in clearing HDV RNA and normalizing alanine aminotransferase levels; however, IFN and IFN + NAs had a high rate of viral relapse at 24 weeks post-treatment follow-up. There was no additional benefit of adding NAs to IFN therapy for chronic hepatitis D; however, the combination of IFN + BLV significantly improved short-term HDV RNA clearance, which showed strong synergistic effects. The seven regimens included in the study did not contribute significantly to liver histological improvement. Therefore, the IFN + BLV combination has the most potential as a treatment option to improve the long-term prognosis or even cure chronic hepatitis D. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic evaluation and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO under the registration number: CRD42022314544.).

Hepatitis D: A Review.

Importance: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection occurs in association with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and affects approximately 12 million to 72 million people worldwide. HDV causes more rapid progression to cirrhosis and higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma than HBV alone or hepatitis C virus. Observations: HDV requires HBV to enter hepatocytes and to assemble and secrete new virions. Acute HDV-HBV coinfection is followed by clearance of both viruses in approximately 95% of people, whereas HDV superinfection in an HBV-infected person results in chronic HDV-HBV infection in more than 90% of infected patients. Chronic hepatitis D causes more rapidly progressive liver disease than HBV alone. Approximately 30% to 70% of patients with chronic hepatitis D have cirrhosis at diagnosis and more than 50% die of liver disease within 10 years of diagnosis. However, recent studies suggested that progression is variable and that more than 50% of people may have an indolent course. Only approximately 20% to 50% of people infected by hepatitis D have been diagnosed due to lack of awareness and limited access to reliable diagnostic tests for the HDV antibody and HDV RNA. The HBV vaccine prevents HDV infection by preventing HBV infection, but no vaccines are available to protect those with established HBV infection against HDV. Interferon alfa inhibits HDV replication and reduces the incidence of liver-related events such as liver decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, or mortality from 8.5% per year to 3.3% per year. Adverse effects from interferon alfa such as fatigue, depression, and bone marrow suppression are common. HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as entecavir or tenofovir, are ineffective against HDV. Phase 3 randomized clinical trials of bulevirtide, which blocks entry of HDV into hepatocytes, and lonafarnib, which interferes with HDV assembly, showed that compared with placebo or observation, these therapies attained virological and biochemical response in up to 56% of patients after 96 weeks of bulevirtide monotherapy and 19% after 48 weeks of lonafarnib, ritonavir, and pegylated interferon alfa treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: HDV infection affects approximately 12 million to 72 million people worldwide and is associated with more rapid progression to cirrhosis and liver failure and higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma than infection with HBV alone. Bulevirtide was recently approved for HDV in Europe, whereas pegylated interferon alfa is the only treatment available in most countries.

Bulevirtide with or without pegIFNα for patients with compensated chronic hepatitis delta: From clinical trials to real-world studies.

Chronic hepatitis D (CHD) is the most severe form of viral hepatitis, characterised by the greatest increase in risk of cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Pegylated-interferon-α (pegIFNα), the only off-label therapeutic option, has been available for the last 30 years but is associated with suboptimal response rates and poor tolerability. Among the new treatment strategies under clinical evaluation, the entry inhibitor bulevirtide (BLV) is the only one that has received conditional approval from the European Medicines Agency (EMA); approval was granted in July 2020 for the treatment of adult patients with compensated CHD at a dose of 2 mg daily. Phase II studies and the week 24 interim analysis of a phase III study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this treatment as a monotherapy or combined with pegIFNα. This favourable profile has been confirmed by recent real-world studies performed in Europe. As a long-term monotherapy, BLV has been successfully used to treat patients with advanced compensated cirrhosis. These encouraging yet preliminary findings must be viewed with caution as many critical issues related to this new antiviral strategy are still poorly understood, as summarised in this review. While waiting for new anti-HBV and anti-HDV drugs to become available for combination studies, BLV treatment is currently the only available anti-HDV therapeutic option that might improve the long-term prognosis of difficult-to-manage patients with CHD.