A digoxin derivative that potently reduces intraocular pressure: efficacy and mechanism of action in different animal models.

Glaucoma is a blinding disease. Reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) is the mainstay of treatment, but current drugs show side effects or become progressively ineffective, highlighting the need for novel compounds. We have synthesized a family of perhydro-1,4-oxazepine derivatives of digoxin, the selective inhibitor of Na,K-ATPase. The cyclobutyl derivative (DcB) displays strong selectivity for the human α2 isoform and potently reduces IOP in rabbits. These observations appeared consistent with a hypothesis that in ciliary epithelium DcB inhibits the α2 isoform of Na,K-ATPase, which is expressed strongly in nonpigmented cells, reducing aqueous humor (AH) inflow. This paper extends assessment of efficacy and mechanism of action of DcB using an ocular hypertensive nonhuman primate model (OHT-NHP) (Macaca fascicularis). In OHT-NHP, DcB potently lowers IOP, in both acute (24 h) and extended (7-10 days) settings, accompanied by increased aqueous humor flow rate (AFR). By contrast, ocular normotensive animals (ONT-NHP) are poorly responsive to DcB, if at all. The mechanism of action of DcB has been analyzed using isolated porcine ciliary epithelium and perfused enucleated eyes to study AH inflow and AH outflow facility, respectively. 1) DcB significantly stimulates AH inflow although prior addition of 8-Br-cAMP, which raises AH inflow, precludes additional effects of DcB. 2) DcB significantly increases AH outflow facility via the trabecular meshwork (TM). Taken together, the data indicate that the original hypothesis on the mechanism of action must be revised. In the OHT-NHP, and presumably other species, DcB lowers IOP by increasing AH outflow facility rather than by decreasing AH inflow.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When applied topically, a cyclobutyl derivative of digoxin (DcB) potently reduces intraocular pressure in an ocular hypertensive nonhuman primate model (Macaca fascicularis), associated with increased aqueous humor (AH) flow rate (AFR). The mechanism of action of DcB involves increased AH outflow facility as detected in enucleated perfused porcine eyes and, in parallel, increased (AH) inflow as detected in isolated porcine ciliary epithelium. DcB might have potential as a drug for the treatment of open-angle human glaucoma.

Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial of the Safety and Efficacy of Travoprost Intraocular Implant in Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of 2 models of the travoprost intraocular implant (fast-eluting [FE] and slow-eluting [SE] types) from 1 of 2 phase 3 trials (the GC-010 trial). DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, sham-controlled, noninferiority trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension having an unmedicated baseline mean diurnal IOP (average of 8 am, 10 am, and 4 pm time points) of ≥ 21 mmHg, and IOP of ≤ 36 mmHg at each of the 8 am, 10 am, and 4 pm timepoints at baseline. METHODS: Study eyes were randomized to the travoprost intraocular implant (FE implant [n = 200] or SE implant [n = 197] model) or to timolol ophthalmic solution 0.5% twice daily (n = 193). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was mean change from baseline IOP in the study eye at 8 am and 10 am, at each of day 10, week 6, and month 3. Safety outcomes included adverse events (AEs) and ophthalmic assessments. RESULTS: Mean IOP reduction from baseline over the 6 time points ranged from 6.6 to 8.4 mmHg for the FE implant group, from 6.6 to 8.5 mmHg for the SE implant group, and from 6.5 to 7.7 mmHg for the timolol group. The primary efficacy end point was met; the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the difference between the implant groups and the timolol group was < 1 mmHg at all 6 time points. Study eye AEs, most of mild or moderate severity, were reported in 21.5%, 27.2%, and 10.8% of patients in the FE implant, SE implant, and timolol groups, respectively. The most common AEs included iritis (FE implant, 0.5%; SE implant, 5.1%), ocular hyperemia (FE implant, 3.0%; SE implant, 2.6%), reduced visual acuity (FE implant, 1.0%; SE implant, 4.1%; timolol, 0.5%), and IOP increased (FE implant, 3.5%; SE implant, 2.6%; timolol, 2.1%). One serious study eye AE occurred (endophthalmitis). CONCLUSIONS: The travoprost intraocular implant demonstrated robust IOP reduction over the 3-month primary efficacy evaluation period after a single administration. The IOP-lowering efficacy in both implant groups was statistically and clinically noninferior to that in the timolol group, with a favorable safety profile. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Maleate 0.5% Microdrops Administered with the Nanodropper.

PURPOSE: To examine if 12.5 µl timolol maleate 0.5% microdrops dispensed with the Nanodropper Adaptor provide noninferior intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction compared with conventional 28 µl drops in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Prospective, noninferiority, parallel, multicenter, single-masked, active-controlled, randomized trial. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve subjects who were recently diagnosed with OAG and OHT at the Aravind Eye Care System. METHODS: Both eyes of subjects received 1 commercially available drop or both eyes of subjects received 1 microdrop of timolol maleate 0.5%. We measured IOP, resting heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 8 hours after timolol administration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The IOP was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were resting HR, systolic BP (sBP), and diastolic BP (dBP). RESULTS: Adaptor-mediated microdrops and conventional drops of timolol significantly decreased IOP compared with baseline at all timepoints. Noninferiority was established at 3 of 4 timepoints. Heart rate decreases with Nanodropper were approximately 3 beats per minute (bpm) less than with conventional drops. CONCLUSIONS: Timolol microdrops appear to be as effective in ocular hypotensive action as conventional drops with a slightly attenuated effect on resting HR and BP. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Pattern electroretinogram, blue-yellow visual evoked potentials and the risk of developing visual field defects in glaucoma suspects: a longitudinal "survival" analysis with a very long follow-up.

PURPOSE: Estimating glaucoma suspects' risk for visual field defects helps to avoid under- and over-treatment. In this retrospective, longitudinal cohort study with a very long follow-up, we studied whether pattern electroretinograms (PERG) amplitudes and blue-on-yellow visual evoked potential (BY-VEP) latencies can predict visual field defects. METHODS: Participants of the Erlangen Glaucoma Study were examined with PERG and BY-VEP between 9/1991 and 8/2001. Stimuli were created using an optical bench with Maxwellian view and consisted of vertical gratings (0,88 cpd) in a 32° field for both PERG and BY-VEP. Patients were treated according to clinical standards and performed standard automated perimetry (SAP) annually. Retrospectively, patients with normal SAP at baseline were selected. Primary endpoint was conversion to perimetric glaucoma. Predictive value was modeled using Kaplan-Meier analyses and a multivariate cox proportional hazards model with the continuous variables PERG amplitude, BY-VEP peak time and SAP square-root of loss variance (sLV) after stratification for Jonas classification of the optic discs. RESULTS: Of 412 patients (288: Jonas 0, 103: I, and 21: II; baseline age: 20-60 years), 65 converted to perimetric glaucoma during follow-up (0.5-23.3 years; median 5.5 years). Optic disc classification was a strong risk factor for conversion (log rank p < 0.0001), and patients with more advanced changes progressed earlier. In the multivariate analysis (log rank p = 0.005), only PERG amplitude remained an independent risk factor after stratification for optic disc morphology (p = 0.021), with a ~ 30% higher risk per µV amplitude decrease. CONCLUSIONS: PERG helps to estimate glaucoma suspects' risk for visual field defects.

Long-term intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of ripasudil-brimonidine fixed-dose combination (RBFC), a new intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication for glaucoma and ocular hypertension (OHT). METHODS: This prospective, multicentre (23 sites in Japan), open-label study enrolled patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), OHT or exfoliative glaucoma and assigned them to one of four combination therapy cohorts, based on previous treatment(s) received: prostaglandin (PG) analogue (Cohort 1); PG analogue and beta-adrenoceptor blocker (ß-blocker) (Cohort 2); PG analogue, ß-blocker and carbonic anhydrase inhibitor (Cohort 3); or other/no treatment (Cohort 4). After a ≥ 4-week screening period, eligible patients received twice-daily RBFC for 52 weeks in addition to the treatments they were already receiving. Efficacy was assessed by change in IOP from baseline through week 52. Adverse events and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were monitored throughout. RESULTS: In total, 179 patients from Cohort 1 (n = 48), Cohort 2 (n = 44), Cohort 3 (n = 41) and Cohort 4 (n = 46) entered the RBFC treatment period. For all cohorts, mean IOP was significantly reduced at 11:00 (2 h after instillation of RBFC) through week 52 with the changes from baseline at week 52 of - 2.7 to - 4.1 mmHg across cohorts; all p < 0.001. Common ADRs were conjunctival hyperaemia (58%), allergic conjunctivitis (18%) and blepharitis (17%), most of which were mild in severity. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated the long-term efficacy and safety of RBFC, both alone and in combination with other anti-glaucoma agents. RBFC may offer a new treatment option for the long-term management of glaucoma and OHT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials Identifier: jRCT2080225063. DATE OF REGISTRATION: 17 February 2020.

A phase III, multicentre, randomised, investigator-masked, cross-over, comparative, non-inferiority trial evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of generic preservative-free Latanoprost (Polpharma S.A.) compared to Xalatan® (Pfizer) in patients with ocular hypertension or primary open-angle glaucoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), often associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP), can lead to permanent damage of the optic nerve, concomitant visual field loss, and blindness. Latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2α analogue, reduces IOP and is used to treat glaucoma. In this clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of Latanoprost Polpharma, a generic preservative-free latanoprost 0.05 mg/ml eye drops solution, in lowering IOP when compared to the originator Xalatan® (latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution, Pfizer). METHODS: This was a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over, comparative, non-inferiority trial carried out in 5 sites in Hungary and Russia. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the non-inferiority of the test product when compared to the reference product with respect to the differences in the mean diurnal IOP on Day 1 (baseline) and Day 29. The secondary endpoints included efficacy, ocular tolerance, safety, and usability. We recruited adult patients (18-75 years) with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomised and received at least one dose of the test or reference product. A virtually identical reduction of the mean diurnal IOP of 7.04 ± 2.14 mmHg or 7.17 ± 2.11 mmHg was found after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 44). In the intention to treat analysis, the reduction was 7.29 ± 2.53 mmHg (95% CI: 6.55-8.04) or 7.43 ± 2.78 mm Hg (95%CI: 6.61-8.24) after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 47). There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost Polpharma was shown to be non-inferior to Xalatan®. Both investigational products were equally well tolerated and safe. The data show a trend in favour of the test product with regards to the severity of hyperaemia and to the velocity of remission of ocular discomfort. Latanoprost Polpharma, being preservative-free, also avoids the cytotoxicity of benzalkonium chloride, the side effects of which may affect patient compliance and lower the quality of life. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study had the ethical and regulatory approval from the National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYEI, OGYEI/41,779- 11/2018) and the Ethics Committee for Clinical Pharmacology (KFEB) of Hungary and from the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (MOH of Russia) prior to the beginning of the study (642/25.12.2018) (clinical trial identification number: 848,300,144/0103/1 - POP03; IND number/EudraCT number: 2018-001727-39).

Cilastatin as a Potential Anti-Inflammatory and Neuroprotective Treatment in the Management of Glaucoma.

Glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease that causes blindness. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the protective role of cilastatin (CIL), generally used in the treatment of nephropathologies associated with inflammation, in an experimental mouse model based on unilateral (left) laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT). Male Swiss mice were administered CIL daily (300 mg/kg, i.p.) two days before OHT surgery until sacrifice 3 or 7 days later. Intraocular Pressure (IOP), as well as retinal ganglion cell (RGC) survival, was registered, and the inflammatory responses of macroglial and microglial cells were studied via immunohistochemical techniques. Results from OHT eyes were compared to normotensive contralateral (CONTRA) and naïve control eyes considering nine retinal areas and all retinal layers. OHT successfully increased IOP values in OHT eyes but not in CONTRA eyes; CIL did not affect IOP values. Surgery induced a higher loss of RGCs in OHT eyes than in CONTRA eyes, while CIL attenuated this loss. Similarly, surgery increased macroglial and microglial activation in OHT eyes and to a lesser extent in CONTRA eyes; CIL prevented both macroglial and microglial activation in OHT and CONTRA eyes. Therefore, CIL arises as a potential effective strategy to reduce OHT-associated damage in the retina of experimental mice.

Steroid-Induced Ocular Hypertension in Mice Is Differentially Reduced by Selective EP2, EP3, EP4, and IP Prostanoid Receptor Agonists.

We tested five chemically and metabolically stable prostaglandin (PG) receptor agonists in a mouse model of dexamethasone-induced ocular hypertension (OHT). Whilst all compounds significantly (p < 0.05, ANOVA) lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) after twice-daily bilateral topical ocular dosing (5 µg/dose) over three weeks, the time course and magnitude of the responses varied. The onset of action of NS-304 (IP-PG receptor agonist) and rivenprost (EP4-PG receptor agonist) was slower than that of misoprostol (mixed EP2/EP3/EP4-PG receptor agonist), PF-04217329 (EP2-PG receptor agonist), and butaprost (EP2-PG receptor agonist). The rank order of IOP-lowering efficacies aligned with the onset of actions of these compounds. Peak IOP reductions relative to vehicle controls were as follows: misoprostol (74.52%) = PF-04217329 (74.32%) > butaprost (65.2%) > rivenprost (58.4%) > NS-304 (55.3%). A literature survey indicated that few previously evaluated compounds (e.g., latanoprost, timolol, pilocarpine, brimonidine, dorzolamide, cromakalim analog (CKLP1), losartan, tissue plasminogen activator, trans-resveratrol, sodium 4-phenyl acetic acid, etc.) in various animal models of steroid-induced OHT were able to match the effectiveness of misoprostol, PF-04217329 or butaprost. Since a common feature of the latter compounds is their relatively high affinity and potency at the EP2-PG receptor sub-type, which activates the production of intracellular cAMP in target cells, our studies suggest that drugs selective for the EP2-PG receptor may be suited to treat corticosteroid-induced OHT.

[Topical application of hypotensive drugs for the prevention of intraocular pressure elevation after intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF drugs]. / Mestnoe primenenie gipotenzivnykh preparatov s tsel'yu profilaktiki povysheniya urovnya vnutriglaznogo davleniya posle intravitreal'nykh in"ektsii anti-VEGF-preparatov.

The management protocol for patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) involves multiple intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-VEGF drugs. The ability to reduce the peak intraocular pressure (IOP) rise is greatly important in clinical practice. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the effect of topical hypotensive drugs on the short-term IOP rise after IVI of anti-VEGF drugs in patients with nAMD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The prospective study included 80 patients with newly diagnosed nAMD. Before the start of treatment, the patients were divided into 4 groups of 20 people each: 1st - controls, who received no prophylactic drugs, in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th groups local instillations of one drop of hypotensive drugs brinzolamide 1%, brinzolamide-timolol, brimonidine-timolol were performed in the conjunctival sac twice: 1 day before the injection (at 20:00) and on the day of the injection 2 hours before the manipulation (at 08:00), respectively. IOP was measured in each patient using ICare Pro non-contact tonometer before injection, as well as 1 min, 30 and 60 min after injection. RESULTS: Prophylactic use of hypotensive drugs was associated with a significant decrease in IOP immediately after IVI compared to the same parameter in the 1st group (p<0.001), the maximum decrease in IOP values was observed when using a fixed combination of brimonidine-timolol by 12.1 mm Hg compared to the controls (p<0.001), the combination of brinzolamide-timolol reduced IOP by 8.5 mm Hg (p<0.001), brinzolamide 1% led to the smallest decrease in IOP - by 5.1 mm Hg (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Study patients that received instillations of brimonidine-timolol combination of one drop into the conjunctival sac 1 day before the injection and on the day of the injection showed the maximum decrease in IOP compared to patients of the other groups.

A Non-Inferiority Study of Combination of Latanoprost and Timolol Formulation to Their Separate Use in Drug-Naive Primary Open Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Nigerian Patients. {RCT 93803536 (Nigeria Clinical Trial Registry)}.

BACKGROUND: Control of intraocular pressure continues to be the mainstay of the management of primary open-angle glaucoma. It is also one of the key factors to consider in the diagnosis and risk of conversion of ocular hypertension to glaucoma (POAG). Medical management of IOP control is central to the treatment of POAG especially in resource-poor countries. AIM: This study aimed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a fixed combination of front-line drugs in the medical management of glaucoma (latanoprost and timolol) compared to concomitant use of the same drugs. METHODOLOGY: It was a double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) in which 116 sequentially consenting participants 40 years and above were recruited and randomized to receive either a fixed combination (group A) or a concomitant combination of latanoprost and timolol (group B). The study was carried out across two tertiary centers in southwest Nigeria. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen (115) patients were analysed, 58 in group A and 57 in group B. The mean age of participants was 57.9 (± 11.5) years. There were 51 (44.3%) females. Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was the diagnosis in 88 (76.5%) of the participants. No statistically significant difference between the two groups at recruitment. Mean IOP reduction from baseline to day 28 was -17.30 ± 7.8 (95% CI: -15.37 to -19.15), and -14.59 ± 6.1 (95% CI: -12.98 to -16.19) for groups A and B. Group A thus had a 54.97% IOP reduction from baseline values while group B had 51.81% (p = 0.770). The mean intergroup difference (MeD) in IOP reduction (µA - µB) between the two groups on day 28 was 2.05 ± 5.74 (95% CI: 0.6 - 1.61) p=0.04. CONCLUSION: The study was able to demonstrate a noninferiority relationship between the fixed combination dosage form of latanoprost and timolol as compared to the concomitant dosage forms.

CONTEXTE: Le contrôle de la pression intraoculaire reste le pilier de la prise en charge du glaucome à angle ouvert primaire. C'est également l'un des principaux facteurs à considérer dans le diagnostic et le risque de conversion de l'hypertension oculaire en glaucome (POAG). La gestion médicale du contrôle de la pression intraoculaire est essentielle dans le traitement du POAG, surtout dans les pays à ressources limitées. OBJECTIF: Cette étude visait à démontrer la non-infériorité d'une combinaison fixe de médicaments de première ligne dans la gestion médicale du glaucome (latanoprost et timolol) par rapport à l'utilisation concomitante des mêmes médicaments. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Il s'agissait d'un essai clinique randomisé en double aveugle dans lequel 116 participants consécutifs âgés de 40 ans et plus ont été recrutés et répartis de manière aléatoire pour recevoir soit une combinaison fixe (groupe A) soit une combinaison concomitante de latanoprost et de timolol (groupe B). L'étude a été menée dans deux centres tertiaires du sud-ouest du Nigeria. RÉSULTATS: Cent quinze (115) patients ont été analysés, 58 dans le groupe A et 57 dans le groupe B. L'âge moyen des participants était de 57,9 (± 11,5) ans. Il y avait 51 (44,3%) femmes. Le glaucome à angle ouvert primaire (POAG) a été diagnostiqué chez 88 (76,5%) des participants. Aucune différence statistiquement significative entre les deux groupes au moment du recrutement. La réduction moyenne de la pression intraoculaire entre le début et le jour 28 était de -17,30 ± 7,8 (IC à 95% : -15,37 à ­19,15) et de -14,59 ± 6,1 (IC à 95% : -12,98 à -16,19) pour les groupes A et B. Le groupe A a ainsi présenté une réduction de 54,97 % de la PIO par rapport aux valeurs initiales tandis que le groupe B a enregistré 51,81 % (p = 0,770). La différence moyenne intergroupes (DMI) dans la réduction de la PIO (µA ­ µB) entre les deux groupes au jour 28 était de 2,05 ± 5,74 (IC à 95% : 0,6 ­ 1,61) p = 0,04. CONCLUSION: L'étude a pu démontrer une relation de noninfériorité entre la forme posologique fixe de latanoprost et de timolol par rapport aux formes posologiques concomitantes. MOTS-CLÉS: Glaucoma, Hypertension oculaire, Contrôle de la PIO, Nigérians, Latanoprost, Timolol, Hypotenseurs oculaires, Combinaison fixe, Patients naïfs aux médicaments.

[Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of glaucoma drugs in the therapy of primary open-angle glaucoma]. / Sravnenie effektivnosti i bezopasnosti primeneniya protivoglaukomnykh preparatov v terapii pervichnoi otkrytougol'noi glaukomy.

The rise in the number of glaucoma drugs complicates the choice that the ophthalmologists have to do. PURPOSE: The study compares the effectiveness, safety and usability of the Russian latanoprost drug Trilaktan and the drug Xalatan in monotherapy for patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a multicenter observational study of the effectiveness and safety of eye drops Trilaktan (Groteks, Russia) and Xalatan (Pfizer MFG. Belgium N.V., Belgium) in monotherapy for patients with POAG of early and moderate stages or OH. The maximum duration of the regimen for the studied drugs was 87 days. The study included 76 patients: 56 (74%) women and 20 (26%) men aged 50-84 years (mean age 66.3±1.3 years). The groups were homogeneous in demographic, anthropometric and vital indicators. Effectiveness was assessed by the trends in intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, safety - by analyzing the adverse events, usability and ease of use - by the questionnaires the study patients filled. RESULTS: Both drugs investigated in this study decrease IOP by a mean of 6-8 mm Hg depending on tonometry method, with difference not exceeding 0.55 mm Hg. The proportion of patients with IOP decreased by 30% and more from the baseline level was 89.5% in both groups. The differences between the indicators of drug usability (by McMonnies conjunctival hyperemia scale, tear break-up time (TBUT), punctate keratopathy, OSDI questionnaire results) were insignificant, and the observed changes did not decrease the tolerability of the studied drugs. The patients using Trilaktan also commended the usability of the included eye drops dispenser. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study allow a conclusion that the effectiveness and safety of Trilaktan (Groteks, Russia) eye drops are equal to those of Xalatan (Pfizer MFG. Belgium N.V., Belgium) eye drops in patients with POAG of early and moderate stages or OH. Trilaktan is easy to use thanks to the included eye drops dispenser.

Efficacy of Morning Versus Evening Latanoprost/Timolol Fixed Combination for Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of morning and evening latanoprost/timolol fixed-combination (LTFC) dosing in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 63 untreated Chinese patients with POAG and ocular hypertension were enrolled. All patients received LTFC and were randomized (1:1) to group 1, morning (8 AM) dosing, or group 2, evening (8 PM) dosing. Vehicle drops were used in the morning or evening, accordingly, to preserve masking. Patients were treated for 4 weeks. Outcomes included mean reduction of the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP fluctuation from baseline after a 4-week treatment. Results: Fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis. In both groups, the posttreatment IOP values were significantly lower than those at baseline at each 24-hour measuring time point. A significant difference between the groups in IOP reduction from baseline was observed at the 9:30 AM time point (4.01 ± 2.62 vs. 2.42 ± 3.23 mm Hg, evening dosing versus morning dosing group; P = 0.048). Both groups showed decreased IOP fluctuation after treatment. However, the morning dosing group had a significantly greater decrease in diurnal IOP fluctuation than that of the evening dosing group (2.04 ± 2.32 mm Hg vs. 0.50 ± 1.70 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.012). Conclusions: Both morning and evening LTFC dosing can effectively reduce 24-hour IOP and IOP fluctuation. Morning dosing is more likely to effectively control diurnal IOP fluctuations. Translational Relevance: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial generates robust evidence on the optimal LTFC dosing regimen to help clinical decision-making in the treatment of raised IOP.

Machine Learning-Derived Baseline Visual Field Patterns Predict Future Glaucoma Onset in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Purpose: The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS) identified risk factors for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in patients with ocular hypertension, including pattern standard deviation (PSD). Archetypal analysis, an unsupervised machine learning method, may offer a more interpretable approach to risk stratification by identifying patterns in baseline visual fields (VFs). Methods: There were 3272 eyes available in the OHTS. Archetypal analysis was applied using 24-2 baseline VFs, and model selection was performed with cross-validation. Decomposition coefficients for archetypes (ATs) were calculated. A penalized Cox proportional hazards model was implemented to select discriminative ATs. The AT model was compared to the OHTS model. Associations were identified between ATs with both POAG onset and VF progression, defined by mean deviation change per year. Results: We selected 8494 baseline VFs. Optimal AT count was 19. The highest prevalence ATs were AT9, AT11, and AT7. The AT-based prediction model had a C-index of 0.75 for POAG onset. Multivariable models demonstrated that a one-interquartile range increase in the AT5 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.25), AT8 (HR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.37), AT15 (HR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.12-1.41), and AT17 (HR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.31) coefficients conferred increased risk of POAG onset. AT5, AT10, and AT14 were significantly associated with rapid VF progression. In a subgroup analysis by high-risk ATs (>95th percentile or <75th percentile coefficients), PSD lost significance as a predictor of POAG in the low-risk group. Conclusions: Baseline VFs, prior to detectable glaucomatous damage, contain occult patterns representing early changes that may increase the risk of POAG onset and VF progression in patients with ocular hypertension. The relationship between PSD and POAG is modified by the presence of high-risk patterns at baseline. An AT-based prediction model for POAG may provide more interpretable glaucoma-specific information in a clinical setting.

Ameliorative effect of resveratrol on acute ocular hypertension induced retinal injury through the SIRT1/NF-κB pathway.

Glaucoma is a kind of neurodegenerative disorder characterized by irreversible loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and permanent visual impairment. It is reported that resveratrol (RES) is a promising drug for neurodegenerative diseases. However, the detailed molecular mechanisms underlying its protective potential have not yet been fully elucidated. The present study sought to investigate whether resveratrol could protect RGCs and retinal function triggered by acute ocular hypertension injury through the SIRT1/NF-κB pathway. An experimental glaucoma model was generated in C57BL/6J mice. Resveratrol was intraperitoneally injected for 5 days. Sirtinol was injected intravitreally on the day of retinal AOH injury. RGC survival was determined using immunostaining. TUNEL staining was conducted to evaluate retinal cell apoptosis. ERG was used to evaluate visual function. The proteins Brn3a, SIRT1, NF-κB, IL-6, Bax, Bcl2, and Cleaved Caspase3 were determined using western blot. The expression and localisation of SIRT1 and NF-κB in the retina were detected by immunofluorescence. Our data indicated that resveratrol treatment significantly increased Brn3a-labelled RGCs and reduced RGC apoptosis caused by AOH injury. Resveratrol administration also remarkably decreased NF-κB, IL-6, Bax, and Cleaved Caspase3 proteins and increased SIRT1 and Bcl2 proteins. Furthermore, resveratrol treatment obviously inhibited the reduction in ERG caused by AOH injury. Importantly, simultaneous administration of resveratrol and sirtinol abrogated the protective effect of resveratrol, decreased NF-κB protein expression, and increased SIRT1 protein levels. These results suggest that resveratrol administration significantly mitigates retinal AOH-induced RGCs loss and retinal dysfunction, and that this neuroprotective effect is partially regulated through the SIRT1/NF-κB pathway.

Comparison of safety and efficacy of Netarsudil 0.02% and Bimatoprost 0.01% monotherapy and combination therapy in primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To study and compare the efficacy and safety profile of Rho-kinase inhibitor (netarsudil 0.02%) and prostaglandin analog (bimatoprost 0.01%) both as monotherapy and in combination. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, monocentric, open-label clinical trial. METHODS: Patients ≥20 years of age with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (IOP >21 mmHg) were recruited and randomized to receive either netarsudil 0.02%, netarsudil 0.02% + bimatoprost 0.01%, or bimatoprost 0.01% once daily for a period of 12 weeks. IOP and side effects were documented at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: The mean treated IOP ranged 17.51-18.57 mmHg for netarsudil, 15.80-16.46 mmHg for bimatoprost, and 14.00-14.87 mmHg for the combination therapy group. The mean IOP reduction from baseline at 4, 8, and 12 weeks was found to be statistically significant ( P < 0.001) in all three groups. The safety profile of netarsudil/bimatoprost combination was consistent with each constituent individually. The only frequently observed ocular adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia, which was seen mostly in netarsudil and netarsudil + bimatoprost groups ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The IOP-lowering effect of netarsudil 0.02% once daily is non-inferior to bimatoprost 0.01% in patients with POAG and ocular hypertension with acceptable ocular safety, and the combination therapy achieved a higher IOP-lowering effect. This group of medications can be a useful adjunct in patients on maximal therapy.

Currently available prostanoids for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension: A review.

Recent advancements in prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) have reinforced their role in managing intraocular pressure (IOP). Latanoprost excels in 24-h IOP control, while various PGAs offer similar effectiveness and side effects, generic PGAs perform as well as branded ones, and a notable IOP rise observed upon PGA discontinuation. Formulations with or without preservatives show comparable IOP reduction and adherence, often surpassing benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved options. Emergent PGAs, such as latanoprostene bunod, fixed-dose netarsudil combined with latanoprost, and omidenepag Isopropyl, offer enhanced or non-inferior IOP reduction. The bimatoprost implant introduces a novel administration method with effective IOP reduction. These developments underscore ongoing progress in PGA-focused ophthalmological research. This article offers a comprehensive review of available prostanoid analogs and explores new developments.

TRPV4 antagonist suppresses retinal ganglion cell apoptosis by regulating the activation of CaMKII and TNF-α expression in a chronic ocular hypertension rat model.

Glaucoma is characterized by a progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), leading to irreversible visual function impairment. Sustained increase in intraocular pressure represents a major risk factor for glaucoma, yet the underlying mechanisms of RGC apoptosis induced by intraocular pressure remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the role of TRPV4 in RGC apoptosis in a rat model of chronic ocular hypertension (COH) and the underlying molecular mechanism. In the COH rat models, we evaluated the visual function, retinal pathological changes and RGC apoptosis. TRPV4 expression and downstream signaling molecules were also detected. We found that RGC density decreased and RGC apoptosis was induced in COH eyes compared with control eyes. TRPV4 expression increased significantly in response to elevated IOP. TRPV4 inhibition by the TRPV4 antagonist HC-067047 (HC-067) suppressed RGC apoptosis and protected visual function. HC-067 treatment upregulated the phosphorylation of CaMKII in both control and COH eyes. Finally, HC-067 treatment suppressed the production of TNF-α induced by ocular hypertension. The TRPV4 antagonist HC-067 might suppress RGC apoptosis by regulating the activation of CaMKII and inhibiting the production of TNF-α in the COH model. This indicated that TRPV4 antagonists may be a potential and novel therapeutic strategy for glaucoma.

Preservative-Free Bimatoprost 0.01% Ophthalmic Gel for Glaucoma Therapy: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial.

PRCIS: Noninferiority of efficacy was demonstrated for a preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% compared with BAK-containing bimatoprost 0.01% following a 12-week treatment period in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Improved tolerability, in particular conjunctival hyperemia, was also observed. PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a preservative-free bimatoprost 0.01% ophthalmic gel (PFB 0.01% gel) compared with preserved bimatoprost 0.01% (PB 0.01%). DESIGN: Phase III, international, multicenter, randomized, 2-parallel group, investigator-masked, 3-month treatment duration. METHODS: Patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomized after a 7-week run-in/washout period to receive once-daily PFB 0.01% gel (n=236) or PB 0.01% (n=249) for 3 months. The primary efficacy measure was changed from baseline in IOP at week 12. Safety measures included adverse events (AEs) and assessment of conjunctival hyperemia. RESULTS: The mean changes from baseline in IOP at week 12 in the PFB 0.01% gel and PB 0.01% were -9.72±2.97 and -9.47±3.06 mm Hg, respectively, at 8 am , -9.41±3.03 and -9.19±3.12 mm Hg at 10 am , and -8.99±3.36 and -8.54±3.44 mm Hg at 4 pm . Noninferiority of PFB 0.01% gel to PB 0.01% was demonstrated at week 12 based on predetermined criteria (upper 95% CI margin of 1.5 mmHg at all time points). The most frequently reported AE was conjunctival hyperemia; 13 (5.5%) patients with PFB 0.01% gel and 17 (6.8%) patients with PB 0.01%. The percentage of patients experiencing a worsening from baseline in conjunctival hyperemia score was lower with PFB 0.01% gel compared to PB 0.01% at week 6 (20.1% vs. 29.3%, respectively) and week 12 (18.3% vs. 30.4%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PFB 0.01% ophthalmic gel has the same efficacy in lowering IOP as PB 0.01% and demonstrated less aggravation of conjunctival hyperemia at weeks 6 and 12.

Understanding the treatment paradigm and the sequencing of antiglaucoma fixed-dose combinations in a tertiary center in South India.

PURPOSE: To analyze the medical management of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) and the placement of fixed-drug combination drugs (FDC) in the treatment paradigm at a tertiary eye care center in South India. METHODS: Retrospective study (January 2011-December 2015) of newly diagnosed POAG and OHT patients (≥18 years) with ≥5 years follow-up. Primary outcome included percentage use of different antiglaucoma drugs (at initiation) and FDCs at the first, second, and third progression (sequencing). Secondary outcomes: Percentage discontinuation for different FDCs, efficacy parameters (decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP)/visual field), adverse events, and the median number of antiglaucoma medications (AGMs) after 5 years. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy eyes (198 patients) were analyzed; 84% of them had POAG. Prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) were the most common (66.2%). FDCs were started in 48 eyes (12.9%), with brimonidine + timolol combination being the most common. FDC usage at subsequent modifications was 10.1%, 24.04%, and 30.0%. Beta-blockers and PGAs were the most frequently prescribed AGMs in our practice pattern, with ß-blockers being the most consistent one. CONCLUSION: This study is a fairly large study with a minimum of a 5-year follow-up of patients with POAG and OHT and gives insights into the treatment patterns, use of FDCs, and the need for multiple medications over time.

Omidenepag Isopropyl Versus Timolol in Patients With Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: Two Randomized Phase 3 Trials (SPECTRUM 4 and 3).

PURPOSE: The SPECTRUM 4 and 3 studies assessed the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) 0.002% vs timolol 0.5% in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (OHT). DESIGN: Phase 3, randomized, controlled, double-masked, noninferiority studies. METHODS: Multicenter studies in the US. Inclusion criteria for adults ≥ 18 years (SPECTRUM 4 [N = 409] and 3 [N = 413]) were open-angle glaucoma or OHT, and IOP ≥ 22 mm Hg and ≤ 34 mm Hg; and for pediatric patients < 18 years (N = 13, SPECTRUM 3) were pediatric glaucoma or OHT. The primary objective in both studies was OMDI noninferiority to timolol in reducing IOP (3 months). SPECTRUM 3 included an additional 9 months of OMDI treatment. Safety evaluations were of ocular/non-ocular adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The IOP-lowering range of OMDI remained consistent in SPECTRUM 4 and 3 (-5.6 to -5.9 vs -5.3 to -5.7 mm Hg, respectively); however, timolol efficacy varied (-5.4 to -6.1 vs -6.4 to -7.0 mm Hg, respectively). OMDI noninferiority was achieved in SPECTRUM 4. Efficacy was maintained with 12-month treatment in SPECTRUM 3. Both studies reported more ocular AEs with OMDI, but lower rates of appearance-altering AEs vs timolol. No new safety concerns were identified. Rates of macular edema in pseudophakic patients increased with prolonged OMDI exposure. CONCLUSIONS: SPECTRUM 4 and 3 demonstrated consistent 3-month IOP-lowering efficacy and safety of OMDI vs timolol in patients with glaucoma or OHT. The 12-month data from SPECTRUM 3 suggest OMDI may have long-term benefits in patients with glaucoma or OHT.