Choice of surgery in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a long-term comparative study.

PURPOSE: Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare sinonasal malignancy. Curative treatment requires multidisciplinary approach, with surgical options consist of the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) and external surgery (EXTS). Here, we provide the post-operative and survival results from a single-center long-term follow-up. METHODS: We report long-term follow-up of 92 ITAC cases treated between 1998 and 2018, treated with EEA (n = 40) or EXTS (n = 52). Survival estimates, post-operative complications and duration of hospitalization were compared between surgical modalities. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar. A higher number of T4b tumors (16%), and subsequently more tumoral invasion (39%), was present in patients undergoing EXTS compared to EEA (3% and 18%, respectively). No difference in Barnes histology subtypes was noticed. Patients undergoing EEA had a shorter post-operative hospitalization stay versus EXTS (4 versus 7 days). Use of EEA was associated to improved disease-specific survival (DSS; 11.4 versus 4.4 years; HREEA = 0.53), especially for patients with T3-4a tumors (11.4 versus 3.0 years; HREEA = 0.41). Patients with T3-4 stage, tumoral invasion, positive surgical margins, mucinous or mixed histology, and prolonged post-operative hospital stay showed poor local relapse-free, disease-free, overall, and DSS. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up in locally advanced ITAC demonstrates that resection by EEA is correlated with improved DSS compared to EXTS, especially for T3-4 tumors. No significant differences between both treatment modalities was observed regarding per- and post-operative complications, although hospitalization in patients undergoing EEA was shorter than for patients treated with EXTS. These results confirm that EEA should remain the preferred surgical procedure in operable cases of sinonasal ITAC.

Surgical management of advanced sinonasal cancer: a 10-year mono-institutional experience.

Objective: Endoscopic endonasal surgery is effective in the treatment of sinonasal cancers. However, in cases of well-differentiated locally advanced neoplasms as well as recurrences, the most appropriate treatment is debated. The purpose of this study is to report a mono-institutional experience on craniofacial surgery performed in a tertiary-care referral centre. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 90 patients treated with transcranial and/or transfacial resection for sinonasal cancer between 2010 and 2020. Outcome measures included overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results: The 5-year OS, DSS and DFS were 48.2%, 60.6% and 28.7%, respectively. Factors correlated with prognosis were pT-classification (p = 0.002), histotype (p = 0.012) and dural involvement (p = 0.004). Independent prognostic factors were orbital apex infiltration (p = 0.03), age (p = 0.002) and adjuvant therapy (p = 0.03). Conclusions: When endoscopic endonasal surgery is contraindicated and chemoradiotherapy is not appropriate, craniofacial and transfacial approaches still represent an option to consider, despite the non-negligible morbidity.

Radiotherapy Results in Locally Advanced Sinonasal Cancer: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Study Group 01-005.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the treatment outcomes and related factors in locally advanced sinonasal cancer across Turkiye. METHODS: Twelve centers participants of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Head and Neck Study Group attended the study. One hundred and ninety-four patients treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy between 2001 and 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute and late toxicity were recorded per Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0. RESULTS: The median age was 58 years and 70% were male. The majority of tumors were located in maxillary sinus (59%). Most of the patients (%83) had T3 and T4A disease. Fifty-three percent of patients were in stage 4A. Radiotherapy was administered to 80% of the patients in the adjuvant settings. Median 66 Gy dose was administered in median 31 fractions. Chemotherapy was administered concomitantly with radiotherapy in 45% of the patients mostly with weekly cisplatin. No grade ≥4 acute and late toxicity was observed. The median follow-up was 43 months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS); locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS); distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 61% and 47%; 69% and 61%; 72%, and 69%, and 56% and 49%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, several factors demonstrated significant influence on OS, such as performance status, surgery, and lymph node involvement. Moreover, surgery was the key prognostic factor for LRFS. For DMFS, lymph node involvement and surgical margin were found to be influential factors. In addition, performance status and lymph node involvement were identified as significantly affecting PFS. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the authors obtained promising results with IMRT. Performance status, lymph node involvement, and surgery emerged as the primary factors significantly influencing OS.

Multimodal assessment of high-risk human papillomavirus in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma.

High-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) is an emerging risk factor for sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC). The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of hrHPV and subtype distribution in SNSCC and correlation with patient and clinical characteristics. This retrospective cohort study included 43 cases diagnosed with incident primary SNSCC at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center from 2010 to 2015. The prevalence of hrHPV was interrogated using a multi-assay approach that included p16 immunohistochemistry (IHC), RNA in-situ hybridization (ISH), and hrHPV DNA sequencing. The association of hrHPV with 5-year overall survival (OS) and 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed. Fourteen cases (32.6 %) were classified as hrHPV positive, based on the a priori definition of having either a positive RNAScope™ ISH test or hrHPV DNA and p16-positive IHC; 9 cases (20.9 %) were positive for all three tests. All cases that arose from an inverted sinonasal papilloma (ex-ISP) were negative for hrHPV. HPV16 was the most common subtype among hrHPV positive cases (58.8 %), followed by HPV18 (17.6 %). No significant association was observed between hrHPV and OS or DFS after adjusting for potential confounding. hrHPV is prevalent in a sizable fraction of SNSCC. Additional studies are needed to better elucidate the relationship with patient survival outcomes and determine the optimal testing modality for prognostication.

Expression of immune checkpoint molecules TIGIT and TIM-3 by tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predicts poor outcome in sinonasal mucosal melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare but aggressive tumor with a poor prognosis. The co-inhibitory receptors T cell immunoglobulin and mucinodomain containing-3 (TIM-3), lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and T cell immunoglobulin and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif domain (TIGIT) are promising new targets in anti-cancer immunotherapy. The expression profiles of these immune checkpoint molecules (ICMs) and potential prognostic implications have not been characterized in SNMM yet. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining for TIGIT, LAG-3 and TIM-3 was performed on tumor tissue samples from 27 patients with primary SNMM. Associations between ICM expression and demographic parameters, AJCC tumor stage, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: SNMM patients with low numbers of TIGIT+ and TIM-3+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in the primary tumor survived significantly longer than patients with a high degree of TIGIT+ and TIM-3+ TILs. High infiltration with TIM-3+ or TIGIT+ lymphocytes was associated with the higher T4 stage and decreased 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: We identified high densities of TIM-3+ and TIGIT+ TILs as strong negative prognostic biomarkers in SNMM. This suggests that TIM-3 and TIGIT contribute to immunosuppression in SNMM and provides a rationale for novel treatment strategies based on this next generation of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Prospective studies with larger case numbers are warranted to confirm our findings and their implications for immunotherapy.

Improved outcomes of localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at the Waldeyer ring in comparison to the sinonasal area in the rituximab era.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the head-and-neck area primarily involves the Waldeyer ring (WR) and sinonasal area (SN). However, the differential clinical outcomes between patients with WR-DLBCL and those with SN-DLBCL in the rituximab era remain unclear. METHODS: To avoid confounding factors contributed by advanced DLBCL with WR and SN involvement, we assessed the clinical outcomes of patients with stage I/II WR-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL and compared them with those having corresponding stages of DLBCL in the lymph nodes but without other extranodal involvement (LN-DLBCL) in the same period. We compared the patients' clinical characteristics, treatment modalities, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) among the three subgroups. RESULTS: We analyzed 67, 15, and 106 patients with WR-DLBCL, SN-DLBCL, and LN-DLBCL, respectively, between January 2000 and December 2019. All patients received front-line rituximab-based regimens, and > 80% received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone-based regimens. More patients with SN-DLBCL had revised International Prognostic Index (R-IPI) score 3 (27%) when compared with those with WR-DLBCL (7%) and those with LN-DLBCL (10%, p = 0.181). Patients with WR-DLBCL, LN-DLBCL, and SN-DLBCL had 5-year EFS and OS rates of 80.7%, 59.5%, and 41.9% (p = 0.021) and 83.7%, 70.8%, and 55.8% (p = 0.032), respectively. Compared to patients with LN-DLBCL, those with WR-DLBCL also had a significantly favorable 5-year EFS rate (p = 0.021) and 5-year OS rate (p = 0.023). Three of the 15 patients with SN-DLBCL experienced lymphoma recurrence in the brain after front-line treatment. In multivariate analyses, R-IPI scores of 1-2 and 3 served as significantly poor prognostic factors for patients with poor EFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to patients with LN-DLBCL, patients with WR-DLBCL receiving front-line rituximab-based treatments had favorable clinical outcomes; however, patients with SN-DLBCL had worse clinical outcomes. Further studies on molecular prognostic factors and treatment strategies for SN-DLBCL are warranted.