Physical and psychosocial outcomes among burn-injured people with heterotopic ossification: A burn model system study.

INTRODUCTION: Heterotopic ossification (HO), or ectopic bone formation in soft tissue, is a not so rare and poorly understood debilitating sequela of burn injury. Individuals developing HO following burn injuries to their hands often experience reductions in mobility, significant contractures, and joint pain. This study identifies demographic characteristics of individuals who develop HO and compares their physical and psychosocial outcomes to the general burn population. METHODS: Participant demographics, injury characteristics, and PROMIS-29 scores across three time points (discharge, six- and 12- months after injury) were extracted from the Burn Model System National Longitudinal Database representing participants from 2015-2022. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to compare PROMIS scores across all three longitudinal measurements. Models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, HO status, and burn size. RESULTS: Of the 861 participants with data concerning HO, 33 were diagnosed with HO (3.8% of participants). Most participants with HO were male (n = 24, 73%) and had an average age of 40 + /- 13 years. Participants with HO had significantly larger burn size (49 +/-23% Total Body Surface Area (TBSA)) than those without HO (16 +/-17%). Participants with HO reported significantly worse physical function, depression, pain interference and social integration scores than those without HO. After adjusting for covariables, participants with HO continued to report statistically significantly worse physical function than those without HO. Although physical functioning was consistently lower, the two populations did not differ significantly among psychosocial outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: While HO can result in physical limitations, the translation to psychosocial impairments was not evident. Targeted treatment of HO with the goal of maximizing physical function should be a focus of their rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b TYPE OF STUDY: Symptom Prevalence Study.

Assessment of surgical treatment of Eagle's syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of surgical treatment of patients with Eagle's syndrome, taking into account both early and late results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group consisted of 15 patients who underwent resection of the styloid process due to Eagle syndrome in the period of 2005-2017. During the follow-up visit, the patients were asked to fill in a post-operative questionnaire that compared the pre-operative symptoms and their severity with the patients' current health condition. The VAS pain scale was used to assess each symptom, and the Laitinen scale was used to assess the quality of life. Data from patients' medical records were also included. The results of the surveys were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: The study showed that in 11 out of 15 cases there was a significant improvement in the level of pain (70.5% on average) and an improvement in quality of life (on average 65%) comparing to the pre-operative condition. The Wilcoxon test for binding pairs, the Mann-Whitney test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Spearman correlation coefficient were used in the statistical analysis. There were statistically significant correlations between the recorded improvement rate and the length of the resected styloid process and its setting. DISCUSSION: The study proved that resection of prolonged styloid process from extraoral approach in most cases is an effective method of treatment of Eagle syndrome, that carries low risk of complications.

Postinfectious heterotopic ossification of the ilium involving the iliacus muscle.

Heterotopic ossification in soft tissue or muscle is rare in the pediatric and adolescent age group. Most cases are associated with musculoskeletal injury and trauma to the central nervous system. Here, we describe an adolescent patient without a history of trauma or lesions in the central nervous system who presented with a painful limp with limited motion of the left hip. Investigations indicated unusually large heterotopic ossification extending from the inner aspect of the ilium down to the anterior part of the hip, highly likely to have developed after an unrecognized periacetabular pyomyositis primarily involving the iliacus muscle. Surgical excision was performed successfully without perioperative complications. No recurrence was detected at the final follow-up.

Heterotopic Ossification in adults following a burn: A phenomenological analysis.

Heterotopic Ossification (HO) is a rare but severely debilitating complication after a burn. Despite there being literature of varying quality explaining the postulated pathological process, risk factors and treatment for HO, the individual experiences of adults diagnosed with HO following a burn, remains unreported. This study sought to explore and describe burn survivors' experiences of HO to gain a greater understanding of the clinical needs for this unique patient population. A phenomenological inquiry of five men and one woman selected through purposeful sampling collected in-depth interviews analysed using Colaizzi's method of data analysis. Five emergent themes: (1) Early signs and symptoms, (2) Impact on the rehabilitation journey, (3) The role of the health care professionals (4) Loss of independence and an increased reliance on others and, (5) Learning to live with it: uncertainty, hope and adaptation. Eleven cluster themes were identified, highlighting the meaning of each emergent theme. These findings describe the significant impact the unique symptomology of HO had on the physical and psychosocial functioning of participants throughout the rehabilitation journey. Central to engagement in rehabilitation, is the participants' desire for autonomy particularly in the domains of living independently and community re-integration.

Floating hip and associated injuries.

AIM: To describe our experience in treating patients diagnosed with floating hip injury and to communicate the outcomes achieved and the rate of complications. A secondary aim is to compare the results of this group in terms of quality of life with those of patients presenting with a fracture either of the pelvis or of the acetabulum, but in which the femoral segment is not involved. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a descriptive study of the patients diagnosed with floating hip injury (25 patients) who were treated at our hospital between 2004 and 2007, with a minimum follow-up of seven years. The results are compared with those of a control group of 56 patients diagnosed with an isolated pelvic or acetabular injury. We describe the injuries and the associated lesion. The patients' quality of life was assessed using the EUROQOL tool. RESULTS: Among the floating hip group of patients, three suffered an additional arterial lesion and were later treated with a supracondylar amputation. Seven patients presented heterotopic ossification. No significant difference was observed between the study and control groups, according to the EUROQOL tool, although the scores for every dimension were lower among the floating hip patients. Among the patients in the control group, the quality of life scores were also affected in every dimension of the EUROQOL scale. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a femoral fracture to a pelvic or acetabular injury, the so-called floating hip, is a devastating injury which has an important impact on patients' quality of life, going beyond that experienced by patients with isolated injuries. Nevertheless, our results did not reflect statistically significant differences in the quality of life among the three groups analyzed: isolated fractures, floating hip and floating hip resulting in amputation.