The network meta-analysis of "on-demand" and "daily" use of paroxetine in treating men with premature ejaculation from randomized controlled trials.

This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of "on-demand" and "daily" use of paroxetine for patients with premature ejaculation (PE). We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to October 2021 to collect randomized controlled trials, and 24 articles including 2, 308 patients were finally involved. The results indicated that paroxetine (daily or on-demand) was superior to placebo at increasing intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT), and 20 mg paroxetine daily was significantly better than fluoxetine and tramadol in improving IELT. Besides, 20 mg paroxetine on-demand was less effective than 20 mg paroxetine on-demand plus phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDEI5) and tramadol monotherapy in increasing IELT. Tramadol monotherapy was more effective than paroxetine monotherapy in improving sexual satisfaction score. Although patients treated with paroxetine had more coitus/week than patients treated with placebo, it was less than patients treated with PDEI5. These findings were robust to sensitivity analyses. The common adverse events related with paroxetine were fatigue, yawning and abnormal sleep (10.96%), gastrointestinal upset (10.80%). The "on-demand" and "daily" use of paroxetine can significantly improve the clinical symptoms of patients with PE and were well tolerated. Combination therapy and tramadol monotherapy can also be used as alternative treatments.

Effect of Paroxetine or Quetiapine Combined With Oxycodone vs Oxycodone Alone on Ventilation During Hypercapnia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Opioids can cause severe respiratory depression by suppressing feedback mechanisms that increase ventilation in response to hypercapnia. Following the addition of boxed warnings to benzodiazepine and opioid products about increased respiratory depression risk with simultaneous use, the US Food and Drug Administration evaluated whether other drugs that might be used in place of benzodiazepines may cause similar effects. Objective: To study whether combining paroxetine or quetiapine with oxycodone, compared with oxycodone alone, decreases the ventilatory response to hypercapnia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial at a clinical pharmacology unit (West Bend, Wisconsin) with 25 healthy participants from January 2021 through May 25, 2021. Interventions: Oxycodone 10 mg on days 1 and 5 and the following in a randomized order for 5 days: paroxetine 40 mg daily, quetiapine twice daily (increasing daily doses from 100 mg to 400 mg), or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ventilation at end-tidal carbon dioxide of 55 mm Hg (hypercapnic ventilation) using rebreathing methodology assessed for paroxetine or quetiapine with oxycodone, compared with placebo and oxycodone, on days 1 and 5 (primary) and for paroxetine or quetiapine alone compared with placebo on day 4 (secondary). Results: Among 25 participants (median age, 35 years [IQR, 30-40 years]; 11 female [44%]), 19 (76%) completed the trial. The mean hypercapnic ventilation was significantly decreased with paroxetine plus oxycodone vs placebo plus oxycodone on day 1 (29.2 vs 34.1 L/min; mean difference [MD], -4.9 L/min [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to -0.6]; P = .01) and day 5 (25.1 vs 35.3 L/min; MD, -10.2 L/min [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to -6.3]; P < .001) but was not significantly decreased with quetiapine plus oxycodone vs placebo plus oxycodone on day 1 (33.0 vs 34.1 L/min; MD, -1.2 L/min [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 2.8]; P = .28) or on day 5 (34.7 vs 35.3 L/min; MD, -0.6 L/min [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 3.2]; P = .37). As a secondary outcome, mean hypercapnic ventilation was significantly decreased on day 4 with paroxetine alone vs placebo (32.4 vs 41.7 L/min; MD, -9.3 L/min [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to -3.9]; P < .001), but not with quetiapine alone vs placebo (42.8 vs 41.7 L/min; MD, 1.1 L/min [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 6.4]; P = .67). No drug-related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study involving healthy participants, paroxetine combined with oxycodone, compared with oxycodone alone, significantly decreased the ventilatory response to hypercapnia on days 1 and 5, whereas quetiapine combined with oxycodone did not cause such an effect. Additional investigation is needed to characterize the effects after longer-term treatment and to determine the clinical relevance of these findings. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04310579.

The effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on male and female fertility: a brief literature review.

Objective: The aim of this review was to determine whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) affect the ability to conceive in men and women of reproductive age, as well as to find out whether there are certain differencies between them in terms of effects on fertility. Methods: Our review was based on systematic search of literature in four online databases: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science and SCIndex (Serbian Citation Index). Results: Several clinical studies reported that SSRIs can decrease the number and viability of sperm, and cause a disruption of their morphological structure. Regarding the effect of these antidepressants on female fertility, some experimental findings suggest that paroxetine and escitalopram may have a negative effect on the ability to conceive due to their stimulatory effect on fallopian tube motility. However, several observational studies favor the use of SSRIs in women with depression/anxiety undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) given their efficiency in suppressing these unpleasant symptoms without a relevant negative impact on IVF outcomes. Conclusions: SSRIs should be avoided male patients of reproductive age who wish to conceive, while the use of these antidepressants seems to be justified in women with depression or anxiety who have undergone IVF.Key pointsSSRIs could cause dose and duration-dependent reversible adverse effects on male fertility parameters.In depressed or anxious male patients of reproductive age who wish to conceive mirtazapine or bupropion should be used because of their lower potential to cause sexual side effects.The results of certain experimental studies indicate that paroxetine and escitalopram may have a negative effect on the fertility of female patients.The use of SSRIs in women with depression or anxiety who have undergone IVF seems to be justified, because these psychiatric disorders reduce the likelihood of becoming pregnant.

[Preventive and therapeutic effect of bioactive component of licorice on antidepressant-induced liver injury].

Since exploding rates of modern mental diseases, application of antidepressants has increased. Worryingly, the antidepressant-induced liver injury has gradually become a serious health burden. Furthermore, since most of the knowledge about antidepressant hepatotoxicity are from pharmacovigilance and clinical case reports and lack of observational studies, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood and there is a lack of efficient treatment strategies. In this study, antidepressant paroxetine directly triggered inflammasome activation evidenced by caspase-1 activation and downstream effector cytokines interleukin(IL)-1ß secretion. The pretreatment of echinatin, a bioactive component of licorice, completely blocked the activation. This study also found that echinatin effectively inhibited the production of inflammasome-independent tumor necrosis factor α(TNF)-α induced by paroxetine. Mechanistically, the accumulation of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species(mtROS) was a key upstream event of paroxetine-induced inflammasome activation, which was dramatically inhibited by echinatin. In the lipopolysaccharide(LPS)-mediated idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury(IDILI) model, the combination of LPS and paroxetine triggered aberrant activation of the inflammasome to induce idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity, which was reversed by echinatin pretreatment. Notably, this study also found that various bioactive components of licorice had an inhibitory effect on paroxetine-triggered inflammasome activation. Meanwhile, multiple antidepressant-induced aberrant activation of the inflammasome could be completely blocked by echinatin pretreatment. In conclusion, this study provides a novel insight for mechanism of antidepressant-induced liver injury and a new strategy for the treatment of antidepressant-induced hepatotoxicity.

Inhibition of CYP2D6 with low dose (5 mg) paroxetine in patients with high 10-hydroxynortriptyline serum levels-A prospective pharmacokinetic study.

The antidepressant nortriptyline is metabolized by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) to the less active and more cardiotoxic drug metabolite, 10-hydroxynortriptyline. High serum levels of this metabolite (>200 µg/L) may lead to withdrawal of nortriptyline therapy. Adding CYP2D6 inhibitors reduce the metabolic activity of CYP2D6 (phenoconversion) and so decrease the forming of hydroxynortriptyline. In this study, 5 mg paroxetine is administered to patients with high hydroxynortriptyline concentrations (>200 µg/L). The shift in number of patients to therapeutic nortriptyline (50-150 µg/L) and safe hydroxynortriptyline (<200 µg/L) concentrations, and the degree of phenoconversion, expressed as the change in ratio nortriptyline/hydroxynortriptyline concentrations before and after paroxetine addition, are prospectively observed and described. After paroxetine addition, 12 patients (80%) had therapeutic nortriptyline and safe hydroxynortriptyline concentrations. Hydroxynortriptyline concentrations decreased in all patients. The average nortriptyline/hydroxynortriptyline concentrations ratio increased from 0.32 to 0.59. This study shows that 5 mg paroxetine addition is able to lower high hydroxynortriptyline serum levels to safe ranges.

Kisspeptin and RF9 prevent paroxetine-induced changes in some parameters of seminal vesicle fluid in the male rats.

The aim of the study was to examine possible impacts of paroxetine and agomelatine on the levels of some components that constitute the seminal vesicle fluid. As a second purpose, it was also aimed to examine how possible negative effects induced by paroxetine on seminal vesicle fluid components were affected by kisspeptin and RF9 (an RFamide-related peptide antagonist, RFRP). Forty-two male rats, aged 21 days, divided into six groups; control, sham, paroxetine, agomelatine, paroxetine + kisspeptin and paroxetine + RF9. Paroxetine (3.6 mg/kg) and agomelatine (10 mg/kg) were administrated by oral gavage. Kisspeptin (1 nmol) and RF9 (20 nmol) were administered intracerebroventricular (i.c.v). The experiments were ended on post-natal 120 days; fructose, vitamin E, sodium, potassium and magnesium levels were measured in seminal vesicle fluid. Fructose, vitamin E, magnesium and potassium levels were significantly decreased in seminal vesicle fluid from the rats treated with paroxetine but did not show significant differences following agomelatine administration. The co-administration of kisspeptin or RF9 with paroxetine prevented the paroxetine-induced negative effects on seminal vesicle fluid components. These results suggest that reduction in sperm fertilising ability caused by changes in seminal vesicle fluid can be seen in long-term antidepressant use. RF-9 and kisspeptin might have positive effects on long-term antidepressant use-induced infertility.

Effectiveness of Paroxetine for Poststroke Depression: A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of paroxetine in poststroke depression (PSD) patients by conducting a meta-analysis. METHODS: We searched Web of Science (science and social science citation index), PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase up to August 2019. Randomized controlled trials that paroxetine compared to other antidepressants or control treatments as monotherapy for patients with PSD. RESULTS: This review identified a total of 4 studies including 212 patients. This meta-analysis presented that paroxetine exhibits beneficial efficacy than routine treatment in PSD patients in terms of the reducing score of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD). Control treatment is more effective than paroxetine. No significant advantage was found with paroxetine. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of paroxetine maybe not very significant compared to other pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Further high quality and large sample size studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of paroxetine in treating PSD in future.

Perinatal exposure to the SSRI paroxetine alters the methylome landscape of the developing dentate gyrus.

Evidence in humans and rodents suggests that perinatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants can have serious long-term consequences in offspring exposed in utero or infancy via breast milk. In spite of this, there is limited knowledge of how perinatal SSRI exposure impacts brain development and adult behaviour. Children exposed to SSRIs in utero exhibit increased internalizing behaviour and abnormal social behaviour between the ages of 3 and 6, and increased risk of depression in adolescence; however, the neurobiological changes underlying this behaviour are poorly understood. In rodents, perinatal SSRI exposure perturbs hippocampal gene expression and alters adult emotional behaviour (including increased depression-like behaviour). The present study demonstrates that perinatal exposure to the SSRI paroxetine leads to DNA hypomethylation and reduces DNA methyltransferase 3a (Dnmt3a) mRNA expression in the hippocampus during the second and third weeks of life. Next-generation sequencing identified numerous differentially methylated genomic regions, including altered methylation and transcription of several dendritogenesis-related genes. We then tested the hypothesis that transiently decreasing Dnmt3a expression in the early postnatal hippocampus would mimic the behavioural effects of perinatal SSRI exposure. We found that siRNA-mediated knockdown of Dnmt3a in the dentate gyrus during the second to third week of life produced greater depression-like behaviour in adult female (but not male) offspring, akin to the behavioural consequences of perinatal SSRI exposure. Overall, these data suggest that perinatal SSRI exposure may increase depression-like behaviours, at least in part, through reduced Dnmt3a expression in the developing hippocampus.

Effect of Pregnancy on Paroxetine-Induced Adiposity and Glucose Intolerance in Mice.

Long-term use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) targeting the serotonin transporter (SERT) has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk for obesity and type 2 diabetes. Previously, using a murine knockout model of SERT, we showed that estrogen suppression is involved in SERT deficiency-induced obesity and glucose intolerance in nonpregnant mice. The present study investigated the effects of chronic paroxetine treatment on adiposity and glucose tolerance in mice before and during pregnancy. Chronic paroxetine treatment in nonpregnant mice resulted in visceral adiposity and glucose intolerance accompanied by reduced circulating 17ß-estradiol levels and ovarian expression of the aromatase (CYP19a1). Remarkably, pregnancy significantly reduced adiposity and improved glucose tolerance in paroxetine-treated mice by rebooting ovarian CYP19a1 expression and 17ß-estradiol production. These effects appear to be reversible as ovarian CYP19a1 expression and circulating 17ß-estradiol returned to prepregnancy levels soon after parturition. As in pregnant mice, 17ß-estradiol replacement treatment in nonpregnant mice reduced paroxetine-induced adiposity. Our findings further suggested that modulation of estrogen synthesis underlies the observed metabolic adverse effects of SSRIs. Although our data revealed a transient reversal effect of pregnancy on SSRI-induced metabolic abnormalities, these observations are experimental and limited to mice. The use of SSRIs during human pregnancy should be cautioned because of potential adverse effects to the fetuses.

Efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the absence of side effects: a mega-analysis of citalopram and paroxetine in adult depression.

It has been suggested that the superiority of antidepressants over placebo in controlled trials is merely a consequence of side effects enhancing the expectation of improvement by making the patient realize that he/she is not on placebo. We explored this hypothesis in a patient-level post hoc-analysis including all industry-sponsored, Food and Drug Administration-registered placebo-controlled trials of citalopram or paroxetine in adult major depression that used the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and included a week 6 symptom assessment (n=15). The primary analyses, which compared completers on active treatment without early adverse events to completers on placebo (with or without adverse events) with respect to reduction in the HDRS depressed mood item showed larger symptom reduction in patients given active treatment, the effect sizes being 0.48 for citalopram and 0.33 for paroxetine. In actively treated subjects reporting early adverse events, who also outperformed those given placebo, the severity of the adverse events did not predict response. Several sensitivity analyses, for example, including (i) those using change of the sum of all HDRS-17 items as effect parameter, (ii) those excluding all subjects with adverse events (that is, also those on placebo) and (iii) those based on the intention-to-treat population, were all in line with the primary analyses. The finding that both paroxetine and citalopram are clearly superior to placebo also when not producing adverse events, as well as the lack of association between adverse event severity and response, argue against the theory that antidepressants outperform placebo solely or largely because of their side effects.

Paroxetine, but not Vortioxetine, Impairs Sexual Functioning Compared With Placebo in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction is prevalent among patients with depression, but assessment of treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction (TESD), a common side effect of antidepressants, can be confounded by the treatment of depressive symptoms in some patients. AIM: To evaluate sexual functioning in healthy volunteers administered vortioxetine compared with paroxetine, an antidepressant known to cause sexual dysfunction, and placebo. METHODS: This phase 4, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-arm, fixed-dose, head-to-head study compared sexual functioning in healthy volunteers administered vortioxetine (10 and 20 mg once daily [QD]), paroxetine (20 mg QD), or placebo for 5 weeks. Approximately equal numbers of men and women ages 18-40 years with normal sexual functioning (self-reported Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire Short-Form [CSFQ-14] score > 47 for men; > 41 for women) were enrolled. Two modified full analysis sets adjusting for treatment non-compliance were prespecified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary endpoint was change in CSFQ-14 total score for vortioxetine (10 and 20 mg) vs paroxetine after 5 weeks. Additional endpoints included CSFQ-14 change scores vs placebo, CSFQ-14 subscales, and patient global impression. RESULTS: Of the 361 subjects enrolled (mean age, 28.4 years), approximately 57% were white, 34% black/African American, and 4% Asian. Vortioxetine 10 mg was associated with significantly less TESD than paroxetine (mean difference, +2.74 points; P = .009). Although vortioxetine 20 mg was associated with numerically less TESD than paroxetine (mean difference, +1.05 points), this difference did not reach statistical significance. Non-compliance appeared to influence results, particularly the paroxetine and vortioxetine 20 mg arms. Paroxetine, but not vortioxetine, was associated with statistically significantly more TESD vs placebo. Vortioxetine also had better outcomes than paroxetine in the 3 phases and 5 dimensions of sexual functioning measured by CSFQ-14. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These data establish that vortioxetine is associated with less TESD than paroxetine in healthy individuals, suggesting that vortioxetine may be a drug of choice in managing depressive disorders when sexual functioning is a concern. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Conducting the study in healthy adults mitigated the risk of an underlying condition (eg, depression) confounding the results. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated by statistically significant TESD with paroxetine vs placebo. The single comparator, paroxetine, and short study duration limit the generalizability of these results. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine is associated with less TESD than paroxetine in healthy adults across all phases and dimensions of the sexual response cycle. Vortioxetine was not significantly different from placebo on sexual functioning; however, the difference was significant between paroxetine and placebo, validating study results. Jacobsen P, Zhong W, Nomikos G, et al. Paroxetine, but not Vortioxetine, Impairs Sexual Functioning Compared With Placebo in Healthy Adults: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. J Sex Med 2019; 16:1638-1649.

Effects of long-term paroxetine or bupropion treatment on puberty onset, reproductive and feeding parameters in adolescent male rats.

Antidepressant use in adolescents has become more common in recent years. We have found several studies stating that prenatal antidepressant exposure can lead to delayed or earlier puberty onset but there was no study on postnatal paroxetine or bupropion. The main aim of this study was to investigate the effect of postnatal exposure to bupropion or paroxetine on puberty onset, reproductive and feeding results. The male rats (n = 8/group) aged 21 days were exposed to paroxetine (3.6 mg/kg) or bupropion (17 mg/kg) orally by gastric gavage every day from postnatal day 21-90. Also, control group received only saline orally as a vehicle. Postnatal exposure to bupropion or paroxetine delayed puberty onset compared to control group, but it was not significant. Sperm counts were significantly lower in the paroxetine and bupropion groups compared to control group. Sperm motility was significantly lower in only bupropion group. In addition, sperm motility was lower in paroxetine group, but it was not significant. In the histopathological examination, there was damage to the testicular structure in both treatments. Taken together, our result indicates that postnatal paroxetine or bupropion exposure may affect puberty onset and contribute to the impairment in fertility in male rats.

Severe transient neonatal long QT syndrome due to maternal paroxetine usage: a case report.

A female neonate with in utero selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor exposure presented with bradycardia shortly after birth. Electrocardiography showed severe QT prolongation and second-degree atrioventricular block. Over time QT-times spontaneously normalised and genetic testing did not show mutations associated with long QT syndrome making maternal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor usage the most likely explanation for the observed severe transient neonatal QT prolongation.

Combination of mirtazapine and paroxetine: possible clinically demonstrated interaction?

We currently have a wide range of antidepressants available. However, the mechanisms of action are different, giving a theoretical justification for their combination in the failure of monotherapy. However, the combination of drugs entails, in addition to benefits, an increase in the risk of, for example, drug interactions. Many drug interactions in psychiatry are due to the pharmacokinetic interactions between drugs, where their plasma concentrations are altered by inhibiting or inducing cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, especially CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein. When treating depression, we should consider the risks and benefits of combination therapy in individual patients and take measures to minimize the side effects of medicines. The case report describes a case of a patient who reported significant depression after adding paroxetine and mirtazapine to psychiatric medication. As a theoretical cause, it discusses the possible clinically demonstrated interaction between paroxetine and mirtazapine, which has been clinically manifested by fatigue and pronounced daytime sleepiness.

Association of Antidepressant Use With Drug-Related Extrapyramidal Symptoms: A Pharmacoepidemiological Study.

BACKGROUND: Antidepressants are one of the most prescribed classes of medications. A number of case reports have linked these drugs to extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs), but no large epidemiologic study to date has examined this association. We sought to quantify the association of EPSs with different antidepressants by undertaking a large pharmacoepidemiologic study. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using a large health claims database in the United States from June 2006 to December 2015. Subjects with a diagnosis of primary Parkinson disease and those who received prescriptions of levodopa, ropinirole, pramipexole, domperidone, metoclopramide, entacapone, benztropine, selegiline, rasagiline, diphenhydramine, trihexyphenidyl, typical and atypical antipsychotics, and tricyclic antidepressants were excluded. Cases were followed to the first billing code for an extrapyramidal event or last date of enrollment in the cohort. For each case, 10 control subjects were matched by follow-up time, calendar time, and age through density-based sampling. Rate ratios were computed using conditional logistic regression adjusting for other covariates. RESULTS: We identified 3,838 subjects with EPSs compared with 38,380 age-matched control subjects. Rate ratios with respect to EPSs were as follows: duloxetine, 5.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.29-7.53); mirtazapine, 3.78 (95% CI, 1.71-8.32); citalopram, 3.47 (95% CI, 2.68-4.50); escitalopram, 3.23 (95% CI, 2.44-4.26); paroxetine, 3.07 (95% CI, 2.15-4.40); sertraline, 2.57 (95% CI, 2.02-3.28); venlafaxine, 2.37 (95% CI, 1.71-3.29); bupropion, 2.31 (95% CI, 1.67-3.21); and fluoxetine, 2.03 (95% CI, 1.48-2.78). CONCLUSIONS: This observational study demonstrates a harmful association between the incidence of Parkinson disease or associated EPSs and use of the antidepressants duloxetine, mirtazapine, citalopram, escitalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, venlafaxine, bupropion, and fluoxetine.

Efficacy and Safety of Agomelatine vs Paroxetine Hydrochloride in Chinese Han Patients with Major Depressive Disorder: A Multicentre, Double-Blind, Noninferiority, Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of agomelatine and paroxetine in Chinese Han patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: A 8-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel study was conducted in 14 medical centers in mainland China from December 2011 to September 2012. A total of 264 subjects with a primary Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition diagnosis of MDD were randomly assigned to receive agomelatine 25-50 mg/d (n = 132) or paroxetine 20-40 mg/d (n = 132). The primary efficacy was evaluated by the decrease of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D17) scores. The secondary measurements of efficacy included Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement. The laboratory test abnormity, and observed and self-reported adverse events were all assessed as the measurements of safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Both the agomelatine and paroxetine groups showed significant improvement from baseline to the end point (P < 0.05) without between-group differences (P > 0.05). The mean decrease of HAM-D17 of agomelatine group was not inferior to the paroxetine group over the 8-week treatment (agomelatine 15.26 ± 6.44 vs paroxetine 14.87 ± 5.89, δ = 2.0; µA-µB 95% confidence interval, -1.13 to 1.91). The percentage of responders at the last postbaseline assessment was similar in the 2 groups on both HAM-D17 (agomelatine 66.15% vs paroxetine 63.49%) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (agomelatine 79.09% vs paroxetine 80.36%). The anxiety (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale) and sleep symptoms (sleep items of HAM-D17) of the patients were improved significantly in the 2 groups at week 8 without between-group differences (P > 0.05). The incidence of overall adverse events was similar in the 2 groups (agomelatine 49.62% vs paroxetine 56.15%, P > 0.05). The incidence of adverse events in skin and subcutaneous tissue was higher in the paroxetine group than in the agomelatine group (none in agomelatine and 4.62% in paroxetine, P = 0.0144). CONCLUSIONS: Agomelatine showed equivalent antidepressant efficacy to paroxetine in treating MDD patients after 8 weeks of treatment with an acceptable safety.

Antidepressants for insomnia in adults.

BACKGROUND: Insomnia disorder is a subjective condition of unsatisfactory sleep (e.g. sleep onset, maintenance, early waking, impairment of daytime functioning). Insomnia disorder impairs quality of life and is associated with an increased risk of physical and mental health problems including anxiety, depression, drug and alcohol abuse, and increased health service use. hypnotic medications (e.g. benzodiazepines and 'Z' drugs) are licensed for sleep promotion, but can induce tolerance and dependence, although many people remain on long-term treatment. Antidepressant use for insomnia is widespread, but none is licensed for insomnia and the evidence for their efficacy is unclear. This use of unlicensed medications may be driven by concern over longer-term use of hypnotics and the limited availability of psychological treatments. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of antidepressants for insomnia in adults. SEARCH METHODS: This review incorporated the results of searches to July 2015 conducted on electronic bibliographic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, 2015, Issue 6), MEDLINE (1950 to 2015), Embase (1980 to 2015) and PsycINFO (1806 to 2015). We updated the searches to December 2017, but these results have not yet been incorporated into the review. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults (aged 18 years or older) with a primary diagnosis of insomnia and all participant types including people with comorbidities. Any antidepressant as monotherapy at any dose whether compared with placebo, other medications for insomnia (e.g. benzodiazepines and 'Z' drugs), a different antidepressant, waiting list control or treatment as usual. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for eligibility and extracted data using a data extraction form. A third review author resolved disagreements on inclusion or data extraction. MAIN RESULTS: The search identified 23 RCTs (2806 participants).Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) compared with placebo: three studies (135 participants) compared SSRIs with placebo. Combining results was not possible. Two paroxetine studies showed significant improvements in subjective sleep measures at six (60 participants, P = 0.03) and 12 weeks (27 participants, P < 0.001). There was no difference in the fluoxetine study (low quality evidence).There were either no adverse events or they were not reported (very low quality evidence).Tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) compared with placebo: six studies (812 participants) compared TCA with placebo; five used doxepin and one used trimipramine. We found no studies of amitriptyline. Four studies (518 participants) could be pooled, showing a moderate improvement in subjective sleep quality over placebo (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.56 to -0.21) (moderate quality evidence). Moderate quality evidence suggested that TCAs possibly improved sleep efficiency (mean difference (MD) 6.29 percentage points, 95% CI 3.17 to 9.41; 4 studies; 510 participants) and increased sleep time (MD 22.88 minutes, 95% CI 13.17 to 32.59; 4 studies; 510 participants). There may have been little or no impact on sleep latency (MD -4.27 minutes, 95% CI -9.01 to 0.48; 4 studies; 510 participants).There may have been little or no difference in adverse events between TCAs and placebo (risk ratio (RR) 1.02, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.21; 6 studies; 812 participants) (low quality evidence).'Other' antidepressants with placebo: eight studies compared other antidepressants with placebo (one used mianserin and seven used trazodone). Three studies (370 participants) of trazodone could be pooled, indicating a moderate improvement in subjective sleep outcomes over placebo (SMD -0.34, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.02). Two studies of trazodone measured polysomnography and found little or no difference in sleep efficiency (MD 1.38 percentage points, 95% CI -2.87 to 5.63; 169 participants) (low quality evidence).There was low quality evidence from two studies of more adverse effects with trazodone than placebo (i.e. morning grogginess, increased dry mouth and thirst). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We identified relatively few, mostly small studies with short-term follow-up and design limitations. The effects of SSRIs compared with placebo are uncertain with too few studies to draw clear conclusions. There may be a small improvement in sleep quality with short-term use of low-dose doxepin and trazodone compared with placebo. The tolerability and safety of antidepressants for insomnia is uncertain due to limited reporting of adverse events. There was no evidence for amitriptyline (despite common use in clinical practice) or for long-term antidepressant use for insomnia. High-quality trials of antidepressants for insomnia are needed.

Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of depression in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Studies report that up to 80% of individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may struggle with symptoms of depression. However, this major comorbidity in COPD is rarely managed effectively. A number of recent studies indicate that left untreated, COPD-related depression is associated with worse quality of life, worse compliance with COPD treatment plan, increased exacerbations, hospital admissions, and healthcare costs when compared to individuals with COPD without depression. Regrettably, COPD practice guidelines do not provide conclusive treatment recommendations for the use of antidepressants in patients with COPD, and base their guidelines on findings from trials in the general population. This may be problematic, as there is an elevated risk of respiratory issues associated with antidepressant treatment and COPD. Evaluating effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions specifically for patients with COPD and depression was therefore paramount. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for the treatment of depression in patients with COPD. SEARCH METHODS: The last search was performed on 26 November 2018. We initially searched the following databases via the Specialised Trials Registers of the Cochrane Airways and Common Mental Disorders Groups (to June 2016): MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED, and the Cochrane Library trials register (CENTRAL). Searches from June 2016 to November 2018 were performed directly on Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and the Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2018). We searched ClinicalTrials.gov, the ISRCTN registry, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to 26 November 2018. We searched the grey literature databases to identify studies not indexed in major databases and the reference lists of studies initially identified for full-text screening. SELECTION CRITERIA: All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of pharmacological interventions with no intervention, placebo or co-intervention in adults with diagnosed COPD and depression were eligible for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed articles identified by the search for eligibility. Our primary outcomes were change in depressive symptoms and adverse events. The secondary outcomes were: change in quality of life, change in dyspnoea, change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), change in exercise tolerance, change in hospital utilisation (length of stay and readmission rates), and cost-effectiveness. For continuous outcomes, we calculated the pooled mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as appropriate. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated the pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% CI using a random-effects model. We assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE framework. MAIN RESULTS: Of the 1125 records screened for eligibility, four RCTs (N = 201 participants), and one on-going study, met the inclusion criteria. Two classes of antidepressants were investigated in two separate comparisons with placebo: a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).TCA versus placeboOnly one RCT (N = 30 participants) provided results for this comparison.Primary outcomesThe TCA (nortriptyline) reduced depressive symptoms post-treatment compared to placebo (MD -10.20, 95% CI -16.75 to -3.65; P = 0.007; very low-quality evidence), as measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). Three participants withdrew from the trial due to adverse events related to the tested antidepressant (dry mouth, sedation, orthostatic hypotension).Secondary outcomesThe overall results post-treatment indicated that nortriptyline was not effective in improving the quality of life of individuals with COPD, as measured by the Sickness Impact Profile (MD -2.80, 95% CI -11.02 to 5.42; P = 0.50; very low-quality evidence).The results for the change in dyspnoea for the domains examined (e.g. dyspnoea scores for 'most day-to-day activities') post-treatment showed no improvement in the intervention group (MD 9.80, 95% CI -6.20 to 25.80; P = 0.23; very low-quality evidence).No data were reported for change in FEV1, change in exercise tolerance, change in hospital utilisation, or cost-effectiveness. The TCA study provided short-term results, with the last follow-up data collection at 12 weeks.The quality of the evidence for all the outcomes evaluated was very low due to a small sample size, imprecision, attrition, and selection and reporting bias.SSRIs versus placeboThree RCTs (N = 171 participants) provided results for this comparison.Primary outcomesThe pooled results for two studies showed no difference for the change in depressive symptoms post-intervention (SMD 0.75, 95% CI -1.14 to 2.64; 148 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.44; very low-quality evidence). High heterogeneity was observed (I² = 95%), limiting the reliability of these findings.While it was not possible to meta-analyse the total adverse events rates across the studies, it was possible to combine the results for two medication-specific adverse effects: nausea and dizziness. There were no significant post-treatment group differences for nausea (OR 2.32, 95% CI 0.66 to 8.12; 171 participants; 3 studies; P = 0.19; very low-quality evidence) or dizziness (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.09 to 4.06; 143 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.61; very low-quality evidence).Secondary outcomesThe pooled analysis of two trials reporting data for the change in quality of life did not show improvement post-treatment in the intervention group compared to placebo (SMD 1.17, 95% CI -0.80 to 3.15; 148 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.25; very low-quality evidence).There was no difference between groups in change in FEV1 post-treatment (MD 0.01, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.05; 148 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.60; low-quality evidence). However, two trials reported improvement in exercise tolerance in the SSRI group versus the placebo group (MD 13.88, 95% CI 11.73 to 16.03; 148 participants; 2 studies; P < 0.001; very low-quality evidence).The trials included in this comparison did not report data related to the change in dyspnoea, hospital utilisation rates, or cost-effectiveness. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to make definitive statements about the efficacy or safety of antidepressants for treating COPD-related depression. New RCTs are needed; with better methodological quality and more accurate reporting of the methods used. Moreover, longer-term follow-up data collection is needed, including outcomes such as adverse events, hospital utilisation and cost-effectiveness.

Does G2677T Polymorphism of the MDR1 Gene Make a Difference in the Therapeutic Response to Paroxetine in Depressed Patients in a Slovakian Population?

BACKGROUND The role of multidrug resistance 1 gene (MDR1 or ABCB1) polymorphism G2677T was studied in relation to paroxetine therapeutic efficacy and its side effects, as well as its association with selected demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with depressive disorder. MATERIAL AND METHODS To evaluate therapeutic efficacy, all patients (n=61) were rated at week 0, 2, 4, and 6 using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-21). They were labelled as "responders" (a decrease in HAMD ≥50%) and "nonresponders". The frequency of the side effects of nausea and sexual dysfunction were assessed using the Utvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser rating scale. The PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism method was used for genotyping. RESULTS A significantly enhanced therapeutic efficacy of paroxetine was observed in patients carrying at least one T allele at week 4 (GG versus GT: 0.049; GG versus GT+TT: 0.035) and week 6 (GG versus TT: 0.001; GG versus GT+TT: 0.016; GG+GT versus TT: 0.003; G versus T: 0.001). On the other hand, carriers of the T allele showed only a nonsignificant increase in HAMD-21 score reduction. In the present study, no significant association between G2677T polymorphism and side effects was detected. However, we found a marginally significant difference between GG and GT genotypes regarding family history of depressive disorder (p=0.049). CONCLUSIONS Our study provided evidence for the potential effect of MDR1 G2677T polymorphism on paroxetine therapeutic efficacy, and eventually on depressive disorder family history. Larger multicenter studies and studies across other ethnic groups are needed to elucidate the contradictory implications of G2677T polymorphism with depressive disorder and its treatment.

The Weight of a Term: "Substantial Evidence" and Buried Data.

When Congress amended the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act in 1962 to ensure the efficacy of drugs before they reach the market, it imposed a standard of evidence distinctly weaker than the reasonable one of preponderance. The difference is material. Some drugs now on the market may or may not have a preponderance of trial evidence of efficacy. An obstacle to a finding of efficacy is the well-known nemesis of drug makers with a definite interest in favorable trials: the placebo effect. Trials where the placebo effect runs high are vulnerable to negative findings, and trials with such findings all too often find their way to burial sites like regulatory archives. Publication bias-the preferential reporting of positive findings-has been abetted by a regulatory standard that does not require a preponderance of evidence and discounts negative trials, provided only that two trials show positive results.