Identification of novel immune-related signatures for keloid diagnosis and treatment: insights from integrated bulk RNA-seq and scRNA-seq analysis.

BACKGROUND: Keloid is a disease characterized by proliferation of fibrous tissue after the healing of skin tissue, which seriously affects the daily life of patients. However, the clinical treatment of keloids still has limitations, that is, it is not effective in controlling keloids, resulting in a high recurrence rate. Thus, it is urgent to identify new signatures to improve the diagnosis and treatment of keloids. METHOD: Bulk RNA seq and scRNA seq data were downloaded from the GEO database. First, we used WGCNA and MEGENA to co-identify keloid/immune-related DEGs. Subsequently, we used three machine learning algorithms (Randomforest, SVM-RFE, and LASSO) to identify hub immune-related genes of keloid (KHIGs) and investigated the heterogeneous expression of KHIGs during fibroblast subpopulation differentiation using scRNA-seq. Finally, we used HE and Masson staining, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, western blotting, immunohistochemical, and Immunofluorescent assay to investigate the dysregulated expression and the mechanism of retinoic acid in keloids. RESULTS: In the present study, we identified PTGFR, RBP5, and LIF as KHIGs and validated their diagnostic performance. Subsequently, we constructed a novel artificial neural network molecular diagnostic model based on the transcriptome pattern of KHIGs, which is expected to break through the current dilemma faced by molecular diagnosis of keloids in the clinic. Meanwhile, the constructed IG score can also effectively predict keloid risk, which provides a new strategy for keloid prevention. Additionally, we observed that KHIGs were also heterogeneously expressed in the constructed differentiation trajectories of fibroblast subtypes, which may affect the differentiation of fibroblast subtypes and thus lead to dysregulation of the immune microenvironment in keloids. Finally, we found that retinoic acid may treat or alleviate keloids by inhibiting RBP5 to differentiate pro-inflammatory fibroblasts (PIF) to mesenchymal fibroblasts (MF), which further reduces collagen secretion. CONCLUSION: In summary, the present study provides novel immune signatures (PTGFR, RBP5, and LIF) for keloid diagnosis and treatment, and identifies retinoic acid as potential anti-keloid drugs. More importantly, we provide a new perspective for understanding the interactions between different fibroblast subtypes in keloids and the remodeling of their immune microenvironment.

Needle-free electronically-controlled jet injector treatment with bleomycin and lidocaine is effective and well-tolerated in patients with recalcitrant keloids.

OBJECTIVES: The treatment of recalcitrant keloids is challenging. Although intralesional bleomycin using conventional needle injectors (CNI) is effective, it has important drawbacks, such as the need for repetitive and painful injections. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability and patient satisfaction of intralesional bleomycin with lidocaine administered with a needle-free electronically-controlled pneumatic jet-injector (EPI) in recalcitrant keloids. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with recalcitrant keloids who had received three intralesional EPI-assisted treatments with bleomycin and lidocaine. Effectiveness was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at baseline and four to six weeks after the third treatment. Additionally, treatment related pain scores numeric rating scale, adverse effects, patient satisfaction and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) were assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with a total of >148 recalcitrant keloids were included. The median total POSAS physician- and patient-scores were respectively 40 and 41 at baseline, and reduced with respectively 7 and 6-points at follow-up ( p < 0.001; p < 0.001). The median pain scores during EPI-assisted injections were significantly lower compared to CNI-assistant injections, (2.5 vs. 7.0, respectively ( p < 0.001)). Adverse effects were mild. Overall, patients were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the treatments (14/15, 93.3%). The GAIS was "very improved" in one patient, "improved" in nine patients and "unaltered" in four patients. CONCLUSIONS: EPI-assisted treatment with bleomycin and lidocaine is an effective, well tolerated, patient-friendly alternative for CNI in patients with recalcitrant keloid scars. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm our findings and improve the clinical management of recalcitrant keloids.

The Combined Application of Bleomycin and Triamcinolone for Treating Refractory Keloids.

BACKGROUND: Triamcinolone acetate injections are considered the first treatment option for keloids, but quite high proportions of keloids either do not respond to triamcinolone or develop recurrence. Beneficial effects of intralesional bleomycin have been recently shown in the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. However, the efficacy of combination therapy using intralesional triamcinolone and bleomycin remains undetermined. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of using bleomycin and triamcinolone mixture to treat refractory keloids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 33 patients with resistant keloids (including 8 men and 25 women) and a mean age of 36.52 years (age range of 18-65 years) were enrolled in this study. A mixture of bleomycin (1 u/cc) with triamcinolone acetonide (13.3 mg/cc) was injected intralesionally into the keloids every 4 to 6 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. The clinical improvement was evaluated using the Japan Scar Scale (JSS) and the physician's global assessment of the flattening of the lesions. Side effects were also noted and recorded. RESULTS: In all patients, the total JSS scores decreased significantly after treatment (2.33 ± 1.05), compared with baseline (11.61 ± 2.59), ( p < .001); 26 keloids (78.8%) showed an excellent response (75%-100% flattening), 7 keloids (21.2%) showed a fair response (25%-75% flattening), and 0 keloids (0%) showed a poor response (<25% flattening). Observed side effects were ulceration (33.3%), hyperpigmentation (33.3%), hypopigmentation (15.15%), secondary infection (33.3%), and telangiectasis (15.15%). CONCLUSION: The combined use of bleomycin and triamcinolone offers a promising treatment option for individuals who have not responded well to traditional therapies.

Using Neuromodulators to Improve Scar Formation, Keloids, Rosacea, and Antiaging.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) treatment has many uses in dermatology. Its mechanism of action and long-term effects for scar formation, rosacea, and antiaging are still being investigated. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a literature review on BoNT-A to further investigate its use in scar formation, rosacea, and antiaging. METHODS: A literature review was conducted using PubMed on botulinum toxin treatment for scar formation, rosacea, and antiaging. Studies discussing the toxin mechanism of action and treatment algorithm were included. The authors also provided their personal experience in BoNT-A use for these 3 conditions. RESULTS: The mechanism of action of Botulinum toxin A in improving scar formation, rosacea, and antiaging is now better understood. While it is effective in the short term, little is still known about how frequently treatment needs to be repeated and if there are any long-term effects. CONCLUSION: While in vitro studies have supporting evidence on the mechanism of action of BoNT-A on scar formation, rosacea, and antiaging, further studies are needed to identify long-term treatment effects.

Intralesional 5-Fluorouracil for Keloids: A Systematic Review.

Keloids are benign, fibroproliferative dermal tumours, often arising after trauma, that are more common in darker skin types. Numerous therapeutic options have been employed for the treatment of keloids; however, there is no one gold standard approach. Five-fluorouracil, a potent chemotherapeutic agent, has emerged as a promising therapeutic option. Therefore, this systematic review, using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focused on providing a broad overview of the use of 5-fluorouracil for the management of keloids. Forty studies (2325 patients) met inclusion criteria and investigated 5-fluorouracil for keloid management, with 19 studies (1043 patients) including a 5-fluorouracil monotherapy group. Five-fluorouracil monotherapy demonstrated consistent keloid improvement with >254 keloids injected across various anatomical regions. Five-fluorouracil monotherapy was most often compared to intralesional triamcinolone acetonide, utilizing the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale and the Vancouver Scar Scale. The most common keloid parameters assessed were height, size, volume, width, length, induration, pruritus, and erythema. Five-fluorouracil monotherapy exhibited substantial improvements, with weight averages of 73% of patients experiencing >25% improvement and 67% achieving >50% improvement. Relapse rate was 16% at 27 weeks after 5-fluorouracil monotherapy treatment. Limitations included potential selection bias, language restrictions, and heterogenous data analysis among studies. Overall, our findings underscore the potential effectiveness of 5-fluorouracil monotherapy in the management of keloids, with an encouraging safety profile. Larger prospective trials are needed to determine optimal therapy or combination therapy for the management of keloids. This detailed compilation of treatment protocols, outcomes, and relapse rates stand as a valuable resource for further research and clinical applications.

Comparative Efficacy of Drug Interventions for Keloids: A Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Keloids are common benign skin lesions originating from a disorganized fibroproliferative collagen response; these lesions often lead to both physical and psychological problems. The optimal treatment for keloids is yet to be standardized. Intralesional injection, which is simple and nontraumatic, is one of the most commonly used treatment modalities for these lesions. In this study, we compared 5 different drugs (intralesional injections) for the treatment of keloids in terms of efficacy. METHODS: We systemically searched relevant studies on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Randomized clinical trials on the safety and efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide (TAC), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), botulinum toxin A (BTA), verapamil, and bleomycin were included in this study. RESULTS: This network meta-analysis included a total of 1114 patients from 20 randomized controlled trials. Botulinum toxin A alone and TAC plus 5-FU exhibited significantly better efficacy than did 5-FU, TAC, and verapamil. No significant difference in efficacy between BTA alone and TAC combined with 5-FU was observed. No significant differences were noted in the adverse event rate between BTA, TAC plus 5-FU, 5-FU, and TAC. Furthermore, we performed surface under the cumulative ranking curve analyses to predict the rank of each intervention (by efficacy and adverse event rate). The predicted ranking by efficacy was as follows: TAC plus 5-FU, BTA, bleomycin, TAC, 5-FU, and verapamil; the predicted ranking by adverse events was as follows: TAC, 5-FU, TAC plus 5-FU, and BTA. Funnel plot analysis revealed no publication bias. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin A and TAC plus 5-FU appear to have outstanding therapeutic efficacy for keloids. The rate of adverse events was similar among BTA, TAC, 5-FU, and TAC plus 5-FU. Nonetheless, additional reviews of rigorous, large-scale randomized controlled trials are warranted for further validation of our findings.

Pharmacotherapy for Keloids and Hypertrophic Scars.

Keloids (KD) and hypertrophic scars (HTS), which are quite raised and pigmented and have increased vascularization and cellularity, are formed due to the impaired healing process of cutaneous injuries in some individuals having family history and genetic factors. These scars decrease the quality of life (QOL) of patients greatly, due to the pain, itching, contracture, cosmetic problems, and so on, depending on the location of the scars. Treatment/prevention that will satisfy patients' QOL is still under development. In this article, we review pharmacotherapy for treating KD and HTS, including the prevention of postsurgical recurrence (especially KD). Pharmacotherapy involves monotherapy using a single drug and combination pharmacotherapy using multiple drugs, where drugs are administered orally, topically and/or through intralesional injection. In addition, pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS is sometimes combined with surgical excision and/or with physical therapy such as cryotherapy, laser therapy, radiotherapy including brachytherapy, and silicone gel/sheeting. The results regarding the clinical effectiveness of each mono-pharmacotherapy for KD/HTS are not always consistent but rather scattered among researchers. Multimodal combination pharmacotherapy that targets multiple sites simultaneously is more effective than mono-pharmacotherapy. The literature was searched using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Online search engines.

Insights into How Plant-Derived Extracts and Compounds Can Help in the Prevention and Treatment of Keloid Disease: Established and Emerging Therapeutic Targets.

Keloid is a disease in which fibroblasts abnormally proliferate and synthesize excessive amounts of extracellular matrix, including collagen and fibronectin, during the healing process of skin wounds, causing larger scars that exceed the boundaries of the original wound. Currently, surgical excision, cryotherapy, radiation, laser treatment, photodynamic therapy, pressure therapy, silicone gel sheeting, and pharmacotherapy are used alone or in combinations to treat this disease, but the outcomes are usually unsatisfactory. The purpose of this review is to examine whether natural products can help treat keloid disease. I introduce well-established therapeutic targets for this disease and various other emerging therapeutic targets that have been proposed based on the phenotypic difference between keloid-derived fibroblasts (KFs) and normal epidermal fibroblasts (NFs). We then present recent studies on the biological effects of various plant-derived extracts and compounds on KFs and NFs. Associated ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical studies are also presented. Finally, we discuss the mechanisms of action of the plant-derived extracts and compounds, the pros and cons, and the future tasks for natural product-based therapy for keloid disease, as compared with existing other therapies. Extracts of Astragalus membranaceus, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Aneilema keisak, Galla Chinensis, Lycium chinense, Physalis angulate, Allium sepa, and Camellia sinensis appear to modulate cell proliferation, migration, and/or extracellular matrix (ECM) production in KFs, supporting their therapeutic potential. Various phenolic compounds, terpenoids, alkaloids, and other plant-derived compounds could modulate different cell signaling pathways associated with the pathogenesis of keloids. For now, many studies are limited to in vitro experiments; additional research and development are needed to proceed to clinical trials. Many emerging therapeutic targets could accelerate the discovery of plant-derived substances for the prevention and treatment of keloid disease. I hope that this review will bridge past, present, and future research on this subject and provide insight into new therapeutic targets and pharmaceuticals, aiming for effective keloid treatment.

Metabolism, fibrosis, and apoptosis: The effect of lipids and their derivatives on keloid formation.

Keloids, pathological scars resulting from skin trauma, have traditionally posed significant clinical management challenges due to their persistence and high recurrence rates. Our research elucidates the pivotal roles of lipids and their derivatives in keloid development, driven by underlying mechanisms of abnormal cell proliferation, apoptosis, and extracellular matrix deposition. Key findings suggest that abnormalities in arachidonic acid (AA) synthesis and non-essential fatty acid synthesis are integral to keloid formation. Further, a complex interplay exists between lipid derivatives, notably butyric acid (BA), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), prostaglandin D2 (PGD2), and the regulation of hyperfibrosis. Additionally, combinations of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with BA and 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-Prostaglandin J2 have exhibited pronounced cytotoxic effects. Among sphingolipids, ceramide (Cer) displayed limited pro-apoptotic effects in keloid fibroblasts (KFBs), whereas sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) was found to promote keloid hyperfibrosis, with its analogue, FTY720, demonstrating contrasting benefits. Both Vitamin D and hexadecylphosphorylcholine (HePC) showed potential antifibrotic and antiproliferative properties, suggesting their utility in keloid management. While keloids remain a prevalent concern in clinical practice, this study underscores the promising potential of targeting specific lipid molecules for the advancement of keloid therapeutic strategies.

A systematic review of the efficacy, safety and satisfaction of regenerative medicine treatments, including platelet-rich plasma, stromal vascular fraction and stem cell-conditioned medium for hypertrophic scars and keloids.

The primary objective of this study is to examine the efficiency of various regenerative medicine approaches, such as platelet-rich plasma, cell therapy, stromal vascular fraction, exosomes and stem cell-conditioned medium, in the process of healing hypertrophic and keloid scars. Major databases including PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were systematically searched, and based on the content of the articles and the inclusion and exclusion criteria, eight articles were selected. Out of these eight articles, there were two non-randomized clinical trial studies (25%), one randomized, single-blinded comparative study (12.5%), one retrospective clinical observational study (12.5%) and four randomized clinical trial studies (50%). We employed EndNote X8 and Google Sheets to conduct article reviews and extract relevant data. Following the review phase, the studies underwent analysis and categorization. In all eight reviewed studies, the effectiveness of regenerative medicine in treating hypertrophic scars and keloids has been proven. Out of these studies, five (62.5%) focused on the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma, two study (25%) examined the effectiveness of stromal vascular fraction and one study (12.5%) explored the efficacy of stem cell-conditioned medium. In two studies (25%), the treatment methods were added to standard treatment, while in six studies (75%), regenerative medicine was used as the sole treatment method and compared with standard treatment. The use of these treatment methods did not result in any serious side effects for the patients. Regenerative medicine is an effective method with minimal side effects for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. It can be used as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatment methods. However, further studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the effectiveness of all sub-branches of this method.

Dasatinib Attenuates Fibrosis in Keloids by Decreasing Senescent Cell Burden.

Keloids are skin tumours caused by aberrant growth of dermal fibroblasts. Cellular senescence contributes to aging and various pathological conditions, including cancer, atherosclerosis, and fibrotic diseases. However, the effects of cellular senescence and senolytic drugs on keloids remain largely unknown. This study investigated senescent fibroblasts in keloids and assessed the effects of dasatinib on these cells. Tissues acquired from keloid removal surgery were analysed for senescence-associated ß-galactosidase-positive cells, p16 expression, and the effects of dasatinib treatment on keloids. Keloid tissue was xenotransplanted into mice, and the effect of intralesional dasatinib injection on keloid growth was observed. The results showed that the numbers of ß-galactosidase-positive and p16-expressing cells were higher in the keloids compared with in the controls. Dasatinib induced selective clearance of senescent cells and decreased procollagen expression in cultured keloid fibroblasts. In this xenotransplant keloid mouse model, intralesional injection of dasatinib reduced gross keloid tissue weight and the expression of both procollagen and p16. In addition, dasatinib-treated keloid fibroblasts conditioned medium reduced procollagen and p16 expression in cultured keloid fibroblasts. In conclusion, these results suggest that an increased number of senescent fibroblasts may play an important role in the pathogenesis of keloids. Therefore, dasatinib could be an alternative treatment for patients with keloids.

The combined application of bleomycin and triamcinolone for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars: An effective therapy for treating refractory keloids and hypertrophic scars.

BACKGROUND: Keloids and hypertrophic scars frustrate patients by the deformity of appearance and organ dysfunction. Many modalities had been tried in clinic practice, but the results are unsatisfied. OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively analysed the combined application of bleomycin and triamcinolone for the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars. METHODS: The combination of bleomycin and triamcin acetonide was applied to the treatment of keloids and hypertrophic scars, 86 cases accepted the treatment. Follow-up 2-5 years after treatment. RESULTS: (1) The pain of scars and itching symptoms have basically subsided through treatment. (2) After drug injection treatment, the keloid began to shrink, some of the keloids disappeared. (3) Small keloids did not recur after treatment. Large keloids had local recurrence after treatment. When further treatment was given, the recurrence disappeared. CONCLUSION: The combined application of bleomycin and triamcin acetonide can effectively cure keloids and hypertrophic scars.

The Clinical Efficacy of Punch Excision Combined With Intralesional Steroid Injection for Keloid Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Conservative and nonconservative treatments are available for keloids. However, few studies have explored the effectiveness of punch excision in keloid treatment. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of punch excision combined with intralesional steroid injection for keloid treatment. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 81 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. The patients in the treatment group were initially treated with punch excision combined with intralesional steroid injection, followed by injection treatment alone. The patients in the control group received intralesional steroid injection alone. The keloid thickness before and after the punch excision was evaluated; the keloid scores at different time points and the number of injection treatments required in both groups were compared, and adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: The mean thickness after punch excision was lower (p < .05), injection treatments were fewer (p < .05), keloid scores were significantly lower (p < .05), and incidence rate of long-term adverse effects was lower in the treatment group than in the control group (p < .05). CONCLUSION: The combination of punch excision and intralesional steroid injection has a notable therapeutic effect on keloids, shortening the treatment course without evident adverse reactions.

Triple Therapy Protocol for Primary and Secondary Auricular Keloids: A Prospective Outcome Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Ear keloid lesions present a significant challenge to the aesthetic surgeon. Keloids are known to recur and can cause severe cosmetic, functional, and psychological impairments. Several adjuvants to surgical removal have been promoted, with varying recurrence rates. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of triple therapy to treat secondary (and large primary) auricular keloids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with secondary or large primary auricular keloids undergoing triple therapy were prospectively studied. Keloids were excised intramarginally under magnification and repeated triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg/mL injections were administered, followed by the application of a custom-made acrylate pressure device. Recurrent keloid formation and adverse events were monitored during a minimum of 6 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Sixteen auricular keloid lesions (3 large primary and 13 secondary) were subjected to the proposed technique with a mean follow-up of 28 months. All cases that adhered to the protocol were free of keloid after triple therapy. Side effects were limited to 1 case of lobular atrophy and slight hypopigmentation. All patients were satisfied with the results. CONCLUSION: The triple therapy protocol is highly effective in primary and secondary auricular keloid as long as patients remain compliant.

Current Practice in Keloid Treatment: a Survey of Dutch Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Several therapeutic options are available for the treatment of keloids, but it remains unclear which treatment options are most commonly used by practitioners. OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevailing treatment for different keloid phenotypes among dermatologists and plastic surgeons in the Netherlands. METHODS: Members of the Dutch society for Plastic surgery and the Dutch society for Dermatology and Venereology were asked to participate. Questions elaborated on the treatment for a small and a large keloid on the mandibula and multiple keloids on the chest. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three responses were obtained. Heterogeneity in treatment was extremely high for the small, large, and multiple keloids with 27, 35, and 33 various first choices, respectively. Intralesional corticosteroids were most often chosen for all 3 different keloid phenotypes. These were mostly (61%) administered as monotherapy for the small keloid and mostly combined with other treatments for the large keloid (19%) and multiple keloids (43%). Surgery was chosen regularly (22%) for the large keloid, mostly combined with intralesional corticosteroids (10%) or brachytherapy (8.4%). CONCLUSION: Keloid treatment is very heterogeneous among dermatologists and plastic surgeons, even in a relatively small country as the Netherlands. Moreover, the treatment choice depends on the keloid phenotype.

Needle-free electronically controlled jet injection with corticosteroids in recalcitrant keloid scars: a retrospective study and patient survey.

First-line treatment of keloids consists of intralesional needle injections with corticosteroids, but generally entails multiple painful sessions, resulting in variable clinical outcomes. Novel needle-free jet injectors may facilitate more effective and patient-friendly dermal drug delivery. Here, we evaluated the effectiveness, tolerability and patient satisfaction of intralesional triamcinolone-acetonide (TCA) treatment in recalcitrant keloids using an electronically controlled pneumatic injector (EPI). A retrospective study was conducted in recalcitrant keloid patients with a history of severe pain during needle injections who received three sessions of EPI + TCA. Outcome measures included Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), treatment-related pain (NRS), adverse effects, and patient satisfaction (survey). Ten patients with in total 283 keloids were included. The POSAS score significantly improved at follow-up and GAIS was reported as '(very) improved' for all patients. EPI + TCA was well-tolerated with a significantly lower NRS pain score compared to needle + TCA (pilot treatment). Only minor adverse effects occurred, and 90% of patients preferred EPI over needle treatment. EPI + TCA is an effective and tolerable treatment for patients with recalcitrant keloids. The minimal treatment-related pain and high patient satisfaction makes it a promising treatment for patients with needle-phobia and/or severe pain during needle injections.

Identification and validation of HOXD3 and UNC5C as molecular signatures in keloid based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis.

BACKGROUND: Keloid is a benign proliferative disease characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix collagen during skin wound healing. The mechanisms of keloid formation have not been fully elucidated, and the current treatment methods are not effective for all keloid patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to find more effective therapies, and our research focused on identifying characteristic molecular signatures of keloid to explore potential therapeutic targets. METHODS: Gene expression profiles of keloid and control group samples were retrieved from the GEO database. Taking the GSE113619 dataset as the training set, the dataset collected skin tissues from non-lesion sites of healthy and keloid-prone individuals, denoted as Day0. The second sampling was performed 42 days later at the original sampling site of control and keloid groups, denoted as Day42.The 'limma' package and Venn diagram identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) specific to keloid day42 versus day0 samples. Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Reactome pathway functional enrichment, and annotation of the characteristic genes were conducted on the Metascape website. Ingenuity canonical pathways, disease & function enrichment analysis and gene interaction network were performed and predicted in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software. Key module genes related to keloid were filtered out by Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA). We utilized the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm to screen the characteristic genes in keloid by the 'glmnet' package. The area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was utilized to determine the effectiveness of potential signatures in discriminating keloid samples from normal samples and performed by using the 'pROC' package. The enrich scores of 24 immune cells in each sample were calculated by the single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm， and then the Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) was performed. Finally, RNA from 4 normal and 6 keloid samples was extracted, and RT-qPCR and Western Blot validated the expression of characteristic genes. RESULTS: A total of 640 DEGs specific to keloid day42 versus day0 samples were detected. 69 key module genes were uncovered and implicated in 'NCAM signaling for neurite out-growth', 'oncogenic MAPK signaling', 'transmission across chemical synapses' pathways, and the mitotic cell cycle-related processes. Five characteristic genes (MTUS1, UNC5C, CEP57, NAA35, and HOXD3) of keloid were identified by LASSO, and among which UNC5C and HOXD3 were validated by ROC plot in external dataset, RT-qPCR and Western Blot in validation samples. The result of ssGSEA indicated that the infiltration of neutrophils showed a relatively higher abundance and natural killer cells with relatively low enrichment in the keloid group compared to the control group. UNC5C was correlated with more immune cells compared with other characteristic genes. CONCLUSION: In this study, characteristic genes associated with keloid were identified by bioinformatic approaches and verified in clinical validation samples, providing potential targets for the diagnosis and treatment of keloid.

Topical Anesthetic versus Lidocaine Mixture for Pain Relief During Keloid Treatment: A Prospective, Split Study.

BACKGROUND: The most common typical symptoms of keloids can be pain and itchiness. Intralesional corticosteroid administration is generally the first-line conservative treatment. Minimizing pain during intralesional corticosteroid injections into keloids should be aimed, as the treatment is often painful. There has yet to be a report on which local anesthetic technique is superior in keloid treatment between topical anesthetic versus lidocaine mixture injection. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective study. The study included 100 patients with painful multiple/multifocal keloids aged 18 to 85 years and was performed between May 2021 and December 2022. Among multiple keloid lesions in a single patient, we assigned the keloids pretreated with topical cream application versus local injection. Then, subjects received 40 mg of intralesional corticosteroid injections into the keloids with a 26G needle to treat keloids. Patients rated the pain intensity of each lesion pretreated with two different anesthetic techniques on an 11-point numeric rating scale. A separate direct question of "Which technique would you recommend if you had to be injected again?" was given. RESULTS: One-hundred patients with painful multiple/multifocal keloids were included in the study. Data on pain intensity numeric rating scale (NRS) revealed that injection techniques relieved the pain statistically significantly more than topical creams. ( P <0.001) 63% of the participants (n=63) preferred the injection technique, while 25% preferred topical anesthetics. In total, 12% of patients responded that there was no difference between the two techniques. CONCLUSION: When comparing with topical lidocaine/prilocaine (EMLA) cream, a 1:1 mixture of 1% lidocaine and epinephrine significantly alleviated pain during and after the corticosteroid injection.

Targeting the Akt/PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway for complete eradication of keloid disease by sunitinib.

Keloid disease is a nodular lesion, tumor-like but not cancerous, and characterized of excessive proliferation of fibroblasts and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) components. This condition often causes itching, pain and cosmetic disfigurement, significantly reducing patient quality of life. To date, no universally effective therapies are available, possibly due to inadequate understanding of keloid pathogenesis. As an oral small-molecule inhibitor of certain tyrosine kinase receptors, sunitinib has shown significant therapeutic effects in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). However, it has never been tested if keloid therapy can be effective for the management of keloids. This study thus aims to explore the potential of sunitinib for keloid treatment. Keloid-derived fibroblasts (KFs) were successfully isolated and demonstrated proliferative advantage to normal skin-derived fibroblasts (NFs). Additionally, sunitinib showed specific cytotoxicity and inhibition of invasion, and induced cell cycle arrest and significant apoptosis in KFs. These effects were accompanied by complete suppression of ECM component expression, including collagen types 1 and 3, upregulation of autophagy-associated LC3B and significant suppression of the Akt/PI3K/mTOR pathway. Moreover, a keloid explant culture model was successfully established and used to test the therapeutic efficacy of sunitinib on keloid formation in nude mice. Sunitinib was found to induce complete regression of keloid explant fragments in nude mice, showing significantly higher therapeutic efficacy than the most commonly used intralesional drug triamcinolone acetonide (TAC). These data suggest that sunitinib effectively inhibits keloid development through suppression of the Akt/PI3K/mTOR pathway and thus can be potentially developed as a monotherapy or combination therapy for the effective treatment of keloid disease.

Remarkable efficiency of surgical shave excision of keloids followed by intralesional injection of Bleomycin. A retrospective study of 314 cases.

The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of a keloid treatment consisting of intradermal surgical shave excision followed by intralesional injections of Bleomycin. A retrospective study performed in the Department of Dermatology, CHU UCL Namur Sainte Elisabeth Clinic, Belgium between 2018 and 2019, on 314 patients with keloids-average age: 32 years (range 19-62). Patients were treated first by surgical shave excision and then after reepithelialization, monthly Bleomycin injections were used until the itching and/or pain ceased and the keloid disappeared. The satisfaction index based on Vancouver Scar Scale on the 314 patients was as follows: 87% of the patients were very satisfied with complete flattening (276 patients), 11% were moderated satisfied with significant flattening (32 patients), and 2% show recurrences (6 patients). Pain and itching disappear totally (100% of patients) based on Visual Analogue Scale. The absence of recurrence within 24 months of the last injection, leads us to believe that this can be a first choice and low-cost treatment, whatever the phototype and the size of the lesion. This treatment can be given in all regions of the world, including in non-industrialized or developing countries.