Case 330: Ovarian Torsion in the Setting of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome.

HISTORY: A 30-year-old female patient with a history of infertility and no pregnancy presented to the gynecologic endometriosis clinic for follow-up 1 month after oocyte retrieval, to be evaluated for pelvic optimization before potential embryo transfer, with worsening dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and overall pelvic pain. Eleven years prior, the patient had undergone left ovarian cystectomy for treatment of endometrioma, as well as excision of deep infiltrating endometriosis. The oocyte retrieval procedure, where more than 30 eggs were retrieved, was complicated by ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and intraperitoneal bleeding, which necessitated admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) for 3 days. Following discharge from the ICU, the patient experienced occasional on-and-off pressure of the urinary bladder and persistent aching pelvic pain.At the 1-month follow-up appointment, the patient's vital signs were assessed (blood pressure, 142/94 mm Hg; pulse rate, 95 per minute; temperature, 96.8 °F [36 °C]). Routine blood investigations, including white blood cell count, were within normal limits. Physical examination showed the abdomen was soft but there was mild pelvic tenderness. The serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin test result was negative for pregnancy, and urinalysis testing showed no leukocyte esterase or nitrites. MRI of the pelvis was performed to evaluate the worsening pain.

TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3, but not TGF-ß2, are upregulated in the ovaries of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome†.

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a life-threatening and potentially fatal complication during in vitro fertilization treatment. The levels of transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) are upregulated in human follicular fluid and granulosa-lutein cells (hGL) of OHSS patients and could contribute to the development of OHSS by downregulating steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) expression. However, whether the same is true for the other two members of the TGF-ß family, TGF-ß2 and -ß3, remains unknown. We showed that all three TGF-ß isoforms were expressed in human follicular fluid. In comparison, TGF-ß1 was expressed at the highest level, followed by TGF-ß2 and TGF-ß3. Compared to non-OHSS patients, follicular fluid levels of TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 were significantly upregulated in OHSS patients. The same results were observed in mRNA levels of TGF-ß isoforms in hGL cells and ovaries of OHSS rats. In addition, StAR mRNA levels were upregulated in hGL cells of OHSS patients and the ovaries of OHSS rats. Treatment cells with TGF-ß isoforms downregulated the StAR expression with a comparable effect. Moreover, activations of SMAD3 signaling were required for TGF-ß isoforms-induced downregulation of StAR expression. This study indicates that follicular fluid TGF-ß1 and TGF-ß3 levels could be used as biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the OHSS.

Optimized personalized management approach for moderate/severe OHSS: development and prospective validation of an OHSS risk assessment index.

STUDY QUESTION: Can a simplified ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk assessment index be developed and validated with sufficient discrimination of moderate/severe OHSS from those without OHSS? SUMMARY ANSWER: This easy-to-use OHSS risk assessment index shows good discriminative power and high calibration accuracy in internal and external validation cohorts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: An early alert and risk stratification is critical to prevent the occurrence of OHSS. We have previously developed a multi-stage smartphone app-based prediction model to evaluate the risk of OHSS, but app use might not be so convenient in many primary institutions. A simplified OHSS risk assessment index has been required. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This training and internal validation of an OHSS risk assessment index used retrospective cohort data from January 2016 to December 2020. External validation was performed with a prospective cohort database from January 2021 to May 2022. There were 15 066 cycles in the training cohort, 6502 cycles in the internal validation cohort, and 8097 cycles in the external validation cohort. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was performed in the reproductive medicine center of a tertiary hospital. Infertile women who underwent ovarian stimulation were included. Data were extracted from the local database with detailed medical records. A multi-stage risk assessment index was constructed at multiple stages. The first stage was before the initiation of ovarian stimulation, the second was before the ovulation trigger, the third was after oocyte retrieval, and the last stage was on the embryo transfer day if fresh embryo transfer was scheduled. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: We established a simplified multi-stage risk assessment index for moderate/severe OHSS, the performance of which was further evaluated with discrimination and calibration abilities in training and internal and external validation cohorts. The discrimination abilities of the OHSS risk assessment index were determined with C-statistics. C-statistics in training (Stages 1-4: 0.631, 0.692, 0.751, 0.788, respectively) and internal (Stages 1-4: 0.626, 0.642, 0.755, 0.771, respectively) and external validation (Stages 1-4: 0.668, 0.670, 0.754, 0.773, respectively) cohorts were all increased from Stage 1 to 3 with similar trends, and were comparable between Stages 3 and 4. Calibration plots showed high agreement between observed and predicted cases in all three cohorts. Incidences of OHSS based on diverse risk stratification (negligible risk, low risk, medium risk, and high risk) were 0%, 0.6%, 2.7%, and 8.3% in the training cohort, 0%, 0.6%, 3.3%, and 8.5% in the internal validation cohort, and 0.1%, 1.1%, 4.1%, and 7.2% in the external validation cohort. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The influence from clinical interventions including cryopreservation of all embryos cannot be eliminated and thus certain risk factors like estrogen level on trigger day might be assigned with a lower risk score. Another weakness of the study is that several preventive treatments, for instance oral aspirin and letrozole, were not recorded and evaluated in the model. Despite the robust reliability of OHSS assessment index, this tool cannot be used directly for clinical decision-making or as a diagnostic tool. Its value lies in its capacity to evaluate the prognosis of various interventions and to facilitate clinician-patient communication. The combination of this tool and further symptoms and examinations should be all taken into consideration for accurate and personalized management of OHSS. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The OHSS risk assessment index can be implemented to facilitate personalized counseling and management of OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2702504), Medical Research Fund Guangdong Provincial (A2024003), and Xinjiang Support Rural Science and Technology (Special Correspondent) Program in Guangdong Province (KTPYJ 2023014). All authors had nothing to disclose. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Serum erythropoietin level is increased during stimulation for IVF but not in OHSS.

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin (Epo) is a potent vascular growth factor that induces angiogenesis and antiapoptotic signalling. We investigated whether the development of numerous follicles and corpora lutea during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle affects circulating Epo levels and further, if Epo could be used as a novel marker for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: 24 women were included in the uncomplicated IVF group and 35 women in the OHSS group. Repeated blood samples from both groups were analysed for Epo, progesterone, blood haemoglobin, and creatinine. Follicular fluid from the IVF group was analysed for Epo and progesterone. Repeated measure analysis was performed for the variables and circulating Epo levels were compared between the IVF group and early OHSS. Furthermore, related growth factors, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) were analysed from subgroup of women to test for correlation with Epo. RESULTS: During IVF, circulating Epo increased from natural mid-luteal phase to stimulated mid-luteal phase (median 9.5; 95% CI 7.2-13.4 IU/L and 12.5; 10.3-13.4 IU/L; p = 0.003). In cycles resulting in pregnancy, Epo level decreased 14 days after oocyte pick-up (OPU) and remained low thereafter. In cycles not resulting in pregnancy, Epo level increased again 35 days after OPU. Follicle fluid Epo concentration was 1.5 times higher than the serum concentration (median 15.4; 95% CI 10.4-19.2 IU/L vs. 10.2; 8.8-12.7; p = 0.006). There was no difference in circulating Epo concentration between early OHSS and uncomplicated IVF. Circulating Epo did not correlate with VEGF or HIF-1. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating Epo levels fluctuate during IVF cycle. We hypothesise this may suggest Epo's involvement in ovarian physiology and angiogenesis. However, Epo was not a clinical marker for OHSS.

Follitropin delta combined with menotropin in patients at risk for poor ovarian response during in vitro fertilization cycles: a prospective controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: The maximum daily dose of follitropin delta for ovarian stimulation in the first in vitro fertilization cycle is 12 µg (180 IU), according to the algorithm developed by the manufacturer, and based on patient's ovarian reserve and weight. This study aimed to assess whether 150 IU of menotropin combined with follitropin delta improves the response to stimulation in women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL. METHODS: This study involved a prospective intervention group of 44 women who received 12 µg of follitropin delta combined with 150 IU of menotropin from the beginning of stimulation and a retrospective control group of 297 women who received 12 µg of follitropin delta alone during the phase 3 study of this drug. The inclusion and exclusion criteria and other treatment and follow-up protocols in the two groups were similar. The pituitary suppression was achieved by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. Ovulation triggering with human chorionic gonadotropin or GnRH agonist and the option of transferring fresh embryos or using freeze-all strategy were made according to the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. RESULTS: Women who received follitropin delta combined with menotropin had higher estradiol levels on trigger day (2150 pg/mL vs. 1373 pg/mL, p < 0.001), more blastocysts (3.1 vs. 2.4, p = 0.003) and more top-quality blastocysts (1.8 vs. 1.3, p = 0.017). No difference was observed in pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates after the first embryo transfer. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome did not differ between the groups. However, preventive measures for the syndrome were more frequent in the group using both drugs than in the control group (13.6% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In women with serum antimullerian hormone levels less than 2.1 ng/mL, the administration of 150 IU of menotropin combined with 12 µg of follitropin delta improved the ovarian response, making it a valid therapeutic option in situations where ovulation triggering with a GnRH agonist and freeze-all embryos strategy can be used routinely. TRIAL REGISTRATION: U1111-1247-3260 (Brazilian Register of Clinical Trials, available at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-2kmyfm ).

Effect of aromatase inhibitors for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To summarize the findings of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the potential effect of aromatase inhibitors on preventing moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). METHODS: We searched for relevant RCTs in electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to August 2023). In addition, we manually searched the related reviews and reference lists of included studies for further relevant studies. We included RCTs where aromatase inhibitors prescribed either during controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) or in early luteal phase. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4.1 software. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS. A descriptive analysis was conducted in cases where a meta-analysis was not feasible due to heterogeneity or lack of comparable data. RESULTS: 2858 records were retrieved and 12 RCTs were finally included. Letrozole was administered in the treatment group during COS in seven RCTs, whereas in the early luteal phase in five RCTs. Compared with the control group, the risk of moderate to severe OHSS significantly reduced by 55% in the letrozole group (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.64, I2 = 0%, 5 RCTs, 494 patients). Moreover, serum estradiol (E2) levels on hCG trigger day significantly decreased with the administration of letrozole during COS (MD -847.23, 95% CI -1398.00 to -296.47, I2 = 93%, 5 RCTs, 374 patients). And serum E2 levels on the 4th, 5th and 7th to 10th day after hCG trigger were also significantly lower than those in the control group when letrozole was administered in the early luteal phase. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high risk of OHSS probably benefit from letrozole, which has been revealed to reduce the incidence of moderate to severe OHSS by this systematic review. However, the very limited number of participants and the quality of the included studies does not allow to recommend letrozole for the prevention of severe OHSS.

The dark side of random-start ovarian stimulation: ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome due to inadvertent pregnancy.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Can inadvertent pregnancies go unnoticed when initiating random-start ovarian stimulation (RSOS) despite monitoring? DESIGN: Case series at a university-based tertiary care fertility clinic. RESULTS: Between June 2022 and December 2023, two cases of undetected early pregnancy at the onset of RSOS were identified, both leading to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) with hospitalization. CONCLUSION: RSOS protocols add flexibility in fertility clinics when there is no intention of a fresh embryo transfer, but may be associated with insidious risk of OHSS. The authors advocate for comprehensive consultation and serial monitoring of human chorionic gonadotrophin during ovarian stimulation, while cautioning against over-reliance on baseline hormone concentrations when initiating RSOS. If the benefits of RSOS seem limited, healthcare providers should consider delaying ovarian stimulation to avert health, but also medicolegal and financial, complications.

Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI).

BACKGROUND: During a stimulated cycle of in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI), women receive daily doses of gonadotropin follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to induce multifollicular development in the ovaries. A normal response to stimulation (e.g. retrieval of 5 to 15 oocytes) is considered desirable. Generally, the number of eggs retrieved is associated with the dose of FSH. Both hyper-response and poor response are associated with an increased chance of cycle cancellation. In hyper-response, this is due to increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), while poor response cycles are cancelled because the quantity and quality of oocytes is expected to be low. Clinicians often individualise the FSH dose using patient characteristics predictive of ovarian response. Traditionally, this meant women's age, but increasingly, clinicians use various ovarian reserve tests (ORTs). These include basal FSH (bFSH), antral follicle count (AFC), and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). It is unclear whether individualising FSH dose improves clinical outcomes. This review updates the 2018 version. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve in women undergoing IVF/ICSI. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group Specialised Register of controlled trials, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trial registers in February 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared (a) different doses of FSH in women with a defined ORT profile (i.e. predicted low, normal, or high responders based on AMH, AFC, and/or bFSH) or (b) an individualised dosing strategy (based on at least one ORT measure) versus uniform dosing or a different individualised dosing algorithm. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. Primary outcomes were live birth/ongoing pregnancy and severe OHSS. MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 studies, involving 8520 women (6 new studies added to 20 studies included in the previous version). We treated RCTs with multiple comparisons as separate trials for the purpose of this review. Meta-analysis was limited due to clinical heterogeneity. Evidence certainty ranged from very low to low, with the main limitations being imprecision and risk of bias associated with lack of blinding. Direct dose comparisons according to predicted response in women Due to differences in dose comparisons, caution is required when interpreting the RCTs in predicted low responders. All evidence was low or very low certainty. Effect estimates were very imprecise, and increased FSH dosing may or may not have an impact on rates of live birth/ongoing pregnancy, OHSS, and clinical pregnancy. Similarly, in predicted normal responders (10 studies, 4 comparisons), higher doses may or may not impact the probability of live birth/ongoing pregnancy (e.g. 200 versus 100 international units (IU): odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.36; I2 = 0%; 2 studies, 522 women) or clinical pregnancy. Results were imprecise, and a small benefit or harm remains possible. There were too few events for the OHSS outcome to enable inferences. In predicted high responders, lower doses may or may not affect live birth/ongoing pregnancy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.46; 1 study, 521 women), severe OHSS, and clinical pregnancy. It is also unclear whether lower doses reduce moderate or severe OHSS (Peto OR 2.31, 95% CI 0.80 to 6.67; 1 study, 521 participants). ORT-algorithm studies Eight trials compared an ORT-based algorithm to a non-ORT control group. It is unclear whether live birth/ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy are increased using an ORT-based algorithm (live birth/ongoing pregnancy: OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29; I2 = 30%; 7 studies, 4400 women; clinical pregnancy: OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.18; I2 = 18%; 7 studies, 4400 women; low-certainty evidence). However, ORT algorithms may reduce moderate or severe OHSS (Peto OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.84; I2 = 0%; 7 studies, 4400 women; low-certainty evidence). There was insufficient evidence to determine whether the groups differed in rates of severe OHSS (Peto OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.28; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 2724 women; low-certainty evidence). Our findings suggest that if the chance of live birth with a standard starting dose is 25%, the chance with ORT-based dosing would be between 25% and 31%. If the chance of moderate or severe OHSS with a standard starting dose is 5%, the chance with ORT-based dosing would be between 2% and 5%. These results should be treated cautiously due to heterogeneity in the algorithms: some algorithms appear to be more effective than others. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We did not find that tailoring the FSH dose in any particular ORT population (low, normal, high ORT) affected live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates, but we could not rule out differences, due to sample size limitations. Low-certainty evidence suggests that it is unclear if ORT-based individualisation leads to an increase in live birth/ongoing pregnancy rates compared to a policy of giving all women 150 IU. The confidence interval is consistent with an increase of up to around six percentage points with ORT-based dosing (e.g. from 25% to 31%) or a very small decrease (< 1%). A difference of this magnitude could be important to many women. It is unclear if this is driven by improved outcomes in a particular subgroup. Further, ORT algorithms reduced the incidence of OHSS compared to standard dosing of 150 IU. However, the size of the effect is also unclear. The included studies were heterogeneous in design, which limited the interpretation of pooled estimates. It is likely that different ORT algorithms differ in their effectiveness. Current evidence does not provide a clear justification for adjusting the dose of 150 IU in poor or normal responders, especially as increased dose is associated with greater total FSH dose and cost. It is unclear whether a decreased dose in predicted high responders reduces OHSS, although this would appear to be the most likely explanation for the results.

Assisted Reproductive Technology in the Presence of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Current Evidence and Knowledge Gaps.

OBJECTIVE: In this narrative review, we discuss the current evidence as well as the knowledge gaps concerning assisted reproductive technology (ART) indications, protocols, and results in the presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: An electronic literature search was performed for English-language publications in the last decade in databases such as PubMed, Medline, the Web of Sciences, Embase, and Scopus. RESULTS: We found evidence that ovarian steroidogenesis and folliculogenesis are deeply altered by PCOS; however, the oocyte quality and pregnancy rates after ART are not affected. Patients with PCOS are more sensitive to the action of exogenous gonadotropins and more likely to develop ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. This risk can be mitigated by the adoption of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocols for pituitary blockade and ovarian stimulation, along with frozen embryo transfer, without compromising the odds of achieving a live birth. Pregnancy complications, such as miscarriage, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and very preterm birth, are more frequent in the presence of PCOS, requiring more intense prenatal care. It remains uncertain whether weight reduction or insulin sensitizers used before ART are beneficial for the treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although PCOS is not a drawback for ART treatments, the patients need special care to avoid complications. More in-depth studies are needed to uncover the mechanisms of follicular growth, gamete maturation, and endometrial differentiation during ART procedures in the presence of PCOS.

Monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF.

Since the inception of in vitro fertilization (IVF), monitoring of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) has traditionally involved numerous appointments for ultrasound and laboratory testing to guide medication use and dosing, determine trigger timing, and allow for measures to reduce the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Recent advances in the field of assisted reproductive technology (ART) have called into question the timing and frequency of COS monitoring appointments, as discussed in this commentary.

Effect of GnRH agonist trigger with or without low-dose hCG on reproductive outcomes for PCOS women with freeze-all strategy: a propensity score matching study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger alone versus dual trigger comprising GnRHa and low-dose human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on reproductive outcomes in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) who received the freeze-all strategy. METHODS: A total of 615 cycles were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to control potential confounding factors between GnRHa-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa) and dual-trigger group (0.2 mg GnRHa plus 1000/2000 IU hCG) in a 1:1 ratio. Multivariate logistic regression was applied to estimate the association between trigger methods and reproductive outcomes. RESULTS: After PSM, patients with dual trigger (n = 176) had more oocytes retrieved, mature oocytes, and 2PN embryos compared to that with GnRHa trigger alone. However, the oocytes maturation rate, normal fertilization rate, and frozen embryos between the two groups were not statistically different. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (14.8% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001) and moderate/severe OHSS (11.4% vs. 1.7%, P < 0.001) were significantly higher in dual-trigger group than in GnRHa-alone group. Logistic regression analysis showed the adjusted odds ratio of dual trigger was 5.971 (95% confidence interval 2.201-16.198, P < 0.001) for OHSS. The pregnancy and single neonatal outcomes were comparable between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For PCOS women with freeze-all strategy, GnRHa trigger alone decreased the risk of OHSS without damaging oocyte maturation and achieved satisfactory pregnancy outcomes.

Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following sole gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger: a case series and literature review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to report three cases of early severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH agonist (GnRH-a), leading to hospitalization and the need for peritoneal drainage. Additionally, a review of the existing literature on this topic is provided. DESIGN: This is a retrospective case series and a literature review. SETTING: This study was conducted at obstetrics and gynecology department of tertiary academic referral hospitals, Israel. PARTICIPANTS: This study included three patients presented with severe OHSS symptoms, including abdominal distension, ascites, and hemoconcentration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main focus of the treatment was to address the symptoms and prevent any further complications. The outcome was the complete recovery of the patients. RESULTS: The presented cases detail instances of severe OHSS following oocyte retrieval, utilizing GnRH-a for triggering. Case 1 involved a 33-year-old patient with a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), Case 2 featured a 22-year-old patient with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and Case 3 included a 41-year-old patient with a history of depressive disorder. All patients receiving supportive care, including infusions and medications, exhibited gradual improvement during hospitalization, with complete resolution observed during the 20-day post-hospitalization check-up. CONCLUSIONS: These three cases highlight the occurrence of severe early OHSS following a GnRH antagonist protocol triggered with GnRH-a in the absence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration for trigger or luteal-phase support. Clinicians must be aware that a GnRH-a trigger followed by a freeze-all approach does not guarantee the complete elimination of OHSS in all patients.

[Efficacy analysis of letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in patients with high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome undergoing total embryo freezing].

Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of letrozole combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) in patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) who underwent total embryo freezing after oocyte retrieval. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 348 female patients who underwent in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) at the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between January and July 2023. Due to their high risk of OHSS, these patients canceled fresh embryo transfer and opted for total embryo freezing. Based on patients' preferences, those who received GnRH-ant and letrozole after oocyte retrieval were categorized as the intervention group (164 cases), while those who did not receive these medications were categorized as the control group (184 cases). The first luteal phase after oocyte retrieval, OHSS grading, ovarian volume, and estradiol (E2) levels were evaluated in both groups. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to analyze factors related to moderate-to-severe OHSS among patients at high risk of OHSS who underwent total embryo freezing after oocyte retrieval. Results: The age of the intervention and control groups was (29.3±3.8) and (29.4±4.1) years, respectively (P=0.821). The duration of the first luteal phase post-oocyte retrieval was shorter in the intervention group [(7.16±1.39) days] compared to that in the control group [(13.88±2.11) days] (P<0.001). The incidences of mild, moderate, and severe OHSS in the intervention group were 75.0% (123 cases), 23.8% (39 cases), and 1.2% (2 cases), respectively, whereas in the control group they were 12.5% (23 cases), 60.9% (112 cases), and 26.6% (49 cases) (P<0.001). E2 levels on the 2nd and 6th days after oocyte retrieval [M(Q1,Q3)] in the intervention group were 1 520.0 (1 213.8, 1 884.8) and 108.5 (45.6, 218.0) ng/L, respectively, which were statistically significantly lower than those in the control group [1 666.0 (508.8, 1 702.0) ng/L] and [1 761.0 (826.0, 2 546.5) ng/L] (P<0.001). The abdominal cavity effusion in the intervention group [M(Q1,Q3)] were 19.5 (0, 30) and 0 mm, statistically significantly less than those in the control group [46.0 (0, 61.0) mm] and [54.5 (0, 69.5) mm] (P<0.001). On the 6th day after oocyte retrieval, the bilateral ovarian volumes in the intervention group were smaller than those in the control group (P<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that no combined treatment with letrozole and GnRH-ant was a risk factor of moderate to severe OHSS. The risk of developing moderate to severe OHSS in the control group was 35.312 times higher than that in the intervention group (OR=35.312, 95%CI: 17.488-71.300). Conclusions: The administration of letrozole combined with GnRH-ant post-oocyte retrieval in patients at high risk of OHSS can prevent the occurrence of moderate-to-severe OHSS, shorten the first luteal phase, accelerate the reduction of serum E2 levels, and promote the recovery of ovarian volume and absorption of abdominal fluid.

[Effect of baseline LH/FSH ratio in PCOS on IVF-ET outcomes: a retrospective cohort study].

Objective: To exlplore the association between the baseline luteinizing hormone/follicle stimulating hormone (LH/FSH) ratio of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and in vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. A total of 2 868 PCOS patients were enrolled, all of the participants were patients in The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University Hospital from October 2015 to October 2021. Propensity score matching (1∶2.5) was conducted to regulate the non-random allocation of patients. Data were extracted from the hospital's medical records. Patients with baseline LH/FSH ratio>2 were deemed as study group, patients with baseline LH/FSH ratio≤2 were deemed as control group. Single factor analysis was applied to compare the differences of pregnancy outcomes between two groups. Results: After propensity score matching (1∶2.5), there were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (all P>0.05), indicating that the data were comparable. In the study group, the total dose of gonadotropin (Gn) and duration of Gn were lower than those of the control group (t=4.989, P<0.001; t=3.267, P=0.001), the rate of in vitro maturation was higher than that of the control group (χ2=4.938, P=0.026), the number of retrieved oocytes and cleavage were higher than those of the control group (t=-2.305, P=0.021; t=-2.816, P=0.005), but there were no differences in the number and rate of high-quality embryos between the two groups (t=-1.636, P=0.102; t=-0.123, P=0.902). The incidence of moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (χ2=17.277, P<0.001). Regardless of fresh embryo transfer or frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles, the incidences of gestational diabetes mellitus in the study group were higher than those in the control group (χ2=9.174, P=0.002; χ2=4.204, P=0.040) of singleton pregnancy. In the fresh embryo transfer cycle, the clinical pregnancy rate [30.30% (20/66) vs 47.75% (53/111)] and delivery rate [30.30% (20/66) vs 46.85% (52/111)] in the study group were lower than those in the control group (χ2=5.198, P=0.023; χ2=4.695, P=0.030). In the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle, the delivery rate in the study group was higer than that in the control group [59.41% (423/712) vs 55.04% (1 053/1 913); χ2=7.526, P=0.023]. The clinical pregnancy rate and delivery rate of fresh embryo transfer cycle in the study group were significantly lower than those of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle (χ2=21.308, P<0.001; χ2=20.871, P<0.001), but there were no significant differences in the control group (all P>0.05). Conclusions: PCOS patients with a higher basal LH/FSH ratio are more likely to develop moderate to severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after controlled ovarian stimulation and have a higher incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus. Better pregnancy outcome could be obtained by frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

[Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with controlled ovarian stimulation after induction therapy for Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia].

A 27-year-old woman with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia received induction therapy with dasatinib and prednisolone. From the time of diagnosis, oocyte storage was planned in accordance with the patient's wishes. After progesterone administration for suppression of menstruation, and blood cell recovery, ovarian stimulation was performed and a sufficient number of eggs was collected. The patient was considered at high risk for ovarian stimulation syndrome (OHSS) and received cabergoline and letrozole. However, ovarian enlargement and ascites were observed on ultrasonography 2 days after egg collection, and a diagnosis of moderate OHSS was made. Circulatory management was performed and low-molecular-weight heparin was administered. Dasatinib was discontinued due to the appearance of pleural effusion. Fluid retention improved after menstruation resumed, and the patient was able to continue consolidation with dasatinib and cord blood transplantation. Although tyrosine kinase inhibitors are expected to simplify planning of oocyte storage, the risk of complicating OHSS should be noted.

[The best evidence for the management of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy]. / è¾ åŠ©ç”Ÿæ®–æ‚£è€ åµå·¢è¿‡åº¦åˆºæ¿€ç»¼åˆå¾ç®¡ç†çš„æœ€ä½³è¯æ®æ€»ç»“.

OBJECTIVES: To summarize the best evidence for the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy. METHODS: Evidence related to the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients undergoing assisted reproductive therapy, including guidelines, clinical decision, best clinical practice, systematic evaluation, expert consensus and evidence summary and related original research were systematically searched in UpToDate, BMJ Best Practice, World Health Organization (WHO) website, Guidelines International Network (GIN), National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) website, National Guidelines website, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) website, New York Academy of Sciences (NYAS) website, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) database, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PubMed, Wanfang database, CNKI, and China Biomedical Literature Database from inception to May 31, 2024. Two researchers independently evaluated the quality of the literature, and a senior researcher made the final decision for literature inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 15 articles were included in the study. Following quality assessment, one article was excluded. The remaining 14 articles included 5 practice guidelines, 3 systematic reviews, 2 expert consensuses, 1 evidence summary, and 3 from UpToDate. Ultimately, 27 pieces of evidence were identified across five key aspects: risk assessment, disease monitoring, early prevention, institutional management and health education. CONCLUSIONS: The updated evidence indicates that the monitoring and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome should start early, personalized treatment plans should be provided for patients, and the rational allocation of treatment resources needs to be promoted to enhance effective management of ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome.

The ART of Thromboprophylaxis in the Prevention of Gestational Venous Thromboembolism.

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) allow infertile couples to conceive. Use of hormones to obtain a controlled ovarian stimulation and an adequate growth of the endometrium preparatory for embryo implantation are not riskless. Among others, thrombotic events can occur during the ovulation induction or pregnancy following ART. As the number of women approaching ART to conceive is steadily increasing, the issue of thrombotic risk in this setting is relevant. Data on the weight of each risk factor and on potential benefit of thromboprophylaxis are largely lacking. In this review, we discuss risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy following ART, with a focus on general (i.e.: age, body mass index, thrombophilia, bed rest, transfusions) and ART-specific (i.e., polycystic ovarian syndrome, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome) risk factors. We also attempt to provide some suggestions to guide clinical practice, based on available data and studies performed outside ART.

Clinical characteristics of functioning gonadotroph adenoma in women presenting with ovarian hyperstimulation: Audit of UK pituitary centres.

OBJECTIVE: Functioning gonadotroph adenomas (FGAs) are rare pituitary tumours stimulating ovarian function with potential life-threatening consequences in women. However, a lack of aggregated clinical experience of FGAs impairs management in affected women. The aim of this study is to present the clinical course of FGA-induced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) cases as identified by some of the largest UK pituitary endocrine tertiary centres with a view to increasing awareness and improving diagnosis and management of women with FGA. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study; audit of eight UK regional pituitary centres for cases of FGAs. SETTING: Specialist neuroendocrine centres in the United Kingdom. PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS: Women diagnosed with FGA-induced OHSS. Description of their clinical course. RESULTS: Seven cases of FGA were identified in women, all causing OHSS. Mean age was 33.4 years at diagnosis. Abdominal pain, irregular periods, headache, and visual disturbances were reported at presentation by 100%, 71%, 57% and 43% of women, respectively. Three of seven women underwent ovarian surgery before FGA diagnosis. Six women underwent transsphenoidal surgery (TSS) with incomplete tumour resection in five of those, but all showed improvement or resolution in symptoms and biochemistry postoperatively. CONCLUSION: FGA is a rare cause of spontaneous OHSS. TSS improves clinical and biochemical features of ovarian hyperstimulation in FGAs. Improved awareness of FGA will prevent inappropriate emergency ovarian surgery.

Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with machine learning.

STUDY QUESTION: Can machine learning predict the number of oocytes retrieved from controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Three machine-learning models were successfully trained to predict the number of oocytes retrieved from COH. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A number of previous studies have identified and built predictive models on factors that influence the number of oocytes retrieved during COH. Many of these studies are, however, limited in the fact that they only consider a small number of variables in isolation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This study was a retrospective analysis of a dataset of 11,286 cycles performed at a single centre in France between 2009 and 2020 with the aim of building a predictive model for the number of oocytes retrieved from ovarian stimulation. The analysis was carried out by a data analysis team external to the centre using the Substra framework. The Substra framework enabled the data analysis team to send computer code to run securely on the centre's on-premises server. In this way, a high level of data security was achieved as the data analysis team did not have direct access to the data, nor did the data leave the centre at any point during the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The Light Gradient Boosting Machine algorithm was used to produce three predictive models: one that directly predicted the number of oocytes retrieved and two that predicted which of a set of bins provided by two clinicians the number of oocytes retrieved fell into. The resulting models were evaluated on a held-out test set and compared to linear and logistic regression baselines. In addition, the models themselves were analysed to identify the parameters that had the biggest impact on their predictions. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: On average, the model that directly predicted the number of oocytes retrieved deviated from the ground truth by 4.21 oocytes. The model that predicted the first clinician's bins deviated by 0.73 bins whereas the model for the second clinician deviated by 0.62 bins. For all models, performance was best within the first and third quartiles of the target variable, with the model underpredicting extreme values of the target variable (no oocytes and large numbers of oocytes retrieved). Nevertheless, the erroneous predictions made for these extreme cases were still within the vicinity of the true value. Overall, all three models agreed on the importance of each feature which was estimated using Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. The feature with the highest mean absolute SHAP value (and thus the highest importance) was the antral follicle count, followed by basal AMH and FSH. Of the other hormonal features, basal TSH, LH, and testosterone levels were similarly important and baseline LH was the least important. The treatment characteristic with the highest SHAP value was the initial dose of gonadotropins. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The models produced in this study were trained on a cohort from a single centre. They should thus not be used in clinical practice until trained and evaluated on a larger cohort more representative of the general population. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF FINDINGS: These predictive models for the number of oocytes retrieved from COH may be useful in clinical practice, assisting clinicians in optimizing COH protocols for individual patients. Our work also demonstrates the promise of using the Substra framework for allowing external researchers to provide clinically relevant insights on sensitive fertility data in a fully secure, trustworthy manner and opens a number of exciting avenues for accelerating future research. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was funded by the French Public Bank of Investment as part of the Healthchain Consortium. T.Fe., C.He., J.C., C.J., C.-A.P., and C.Hi. are employed by Apricity. C.Hi. has received consulting fees and honoraria from Vitrolife, Merck Serono, Ferring, Cooper Surgical, Dibimed, Apricity, and Fairtility and travel support from Fairtility and Vitrolife, participates on an advisory board for Merck Serono, was the founder and organizer of the AI Fertility conference, has stock in Aria Fertility, TMRW, Fairtility, Apricity, and IVF Professionals, and received free equipment from Planar in exchange for first user feedback. C.J. has received a grant from BPI. J.C. has also received a grant from BPI, is a member of the Merck AI advisory board, and is a board member of Labelia Labs. C.He has a contract for medical writing of this manuscript by CHU Nantes and has received travel support from Apricity. A.R. haș received honoraria from Ferring and Organon. T.Fe. has received a grant from BPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

A multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing IVF or ICSI.

STUDY QUESTION: Does assisted hatching increase the cumulative live birth rate in subfertile couples with repeated implantation failure? SUMMARY ANSWER: This study showed no evidence of effect for assisted hatching as an add-on in subfertile couples with repeated implantation failure. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The efficacy of assisted hatching, with regard to the live birth rate has not been convincingly demonstrated in randomized trials nor meta-analyses. It is suggested though that especially poor prognosis women, e.g. women with repeated implantation failure, might benefit most from assisted hatching. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study was designed as a double-blinded, multicentre randomized controlled superiority trial. In order to demonstrate a statistically significant absolute increase in live birth rate of 10% after assisted hatching, 294 participants needed to be included per treatment arm, being a total of 588 subfertile couples. Participants were included and randomized from November 2012 until November 2017, 297 were allocated to the assisted hatching arm of the study and 295 to the control arm. Block randomization in blocks of 20 participants was applied and randomization was concealed from participants, treating physicians, and laboratory staff involved in the embryo transfer procedure. Ovarian hyperstimulation, oocyte retrieval, laboratory procedures, embryo selection for transfer and cryopreservation, the transfer itself, and luteal support were performed according to local protocols and were identical in both the intervention and control arm of the study with the exception of the assisted hatching procedure which was only performed in the intervention group. The laboratory staff performing the assisted hatching procedure was not involved in the embryo transfer itself. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Participants were eligible for inclusion in the study after having had either at least two consecutive fresh IVF or ICSI embryo transfers, including the transfer of frozen and thawed embryos originating from those fresh cycles, and which did not result in a pregnancy or as having had at least one fresh IVF or ICSI transfer and at least two frozen embryo transfers with embryos originating from that fresh cycle which did not result in a pregnancy. The study was performed at the laboratory sites of three tertiary referral hospitals and two university medical centres in the Netherlands. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The cumulative live birth rate per started cycle, including the transfer of fresh and subsequent frozen/thawed embryos if applicable, resulted in 77 live births in the assisted hatching group (n = 297, 25.9%) and 68 live births in the control group (n = 295, 23.1%). This proved to be statistically not significantly different (relative risk: 1.125, 95% CI: 0.847 to 1.494, P = 0.416). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There was a small cohort of subfertile couples that after not achieving an ongoing pregnancy, still had cryopreserved embryos in storage at the endpoint of the trial, i.e. 1 year after the last randomization. It cannot be excluded that the future transfer of these frozen/thawed embryos increases the cumulative live birth rate in either or both study arms. Next, at the start of this study, there was no international consensus on the definition of repeated implantation failure. Therefore, it cannot be excluded that assisted hatching might be effective in higher order repeated implantation failures. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: This study demonstrated no evidence of a statistically significant effect for assisted hatching by increasing live birth rates in subfertile couples with repeated implantation failure, i.e. the couples which, based on meta-analyses, are suggested to benefit most from assisted hatching. It is therefore suggested that assisted hatching should only be offered if information on the absence of evidence of effect is provided, at no extra costs and preferably only in the setting of a clinical trial taking cost-effectiveness into account. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Netherlands Trial Register (NTR 3387, NL 3235, https://www.clinicaltrialregister.nl/nl/trial/26138). TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 6 April 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT: 28 November 2012.