Current status of prevention and treatment of respiratory diseases in primary care in China: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: China launched its new round of health care reform to develop primary care in 2009, establishing 954,390 primary care institutions that employed over 10 million staff by 2019. However, some studies have shown that the prevention and management of respiratory diseases is inadequate in these institutions. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of grassroots institutions throughout China between September and December 2020 based on the standardized Prevention and Treatment System and Capacity Building Project of Respiratory Diseases in primary care settings. The operation of the respiratory department in primary health care institutions was evaluated in terms of facilities, drugs, personnel and management of chronic diseases by means of questionnaires. Descriptive analyses were performed to calculate percentages and frequencies of key parameters. RESULTS: A total of 144 primary health care institutions were surveyed, including 51 in the east, 82 in the west, 9 in the central and 2 in the northeast. Approximately 60% of institutions had spirometers and pulse oximeters. The majority had short-acting bronchodilators, theophylline, systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics, and traditional Chinese medicine. More than half had at least one respiratory physician and operator for spirometry. Half of the institutions carried out screening of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease within the jurisdiction. The institutions in the east were superior to those in the west regarding the equipment, common drugs, medical staff, and management of respiratory diseases. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that the overall operation of the respiratory department in primary care settings needs to be further strengthened. It is crucial to provide adequate essential equipment, medical professionals, and medicines for proper diagnosis and treatment of chronic respiratory diseases, as well as improving the management of diseases.

Prevention and management of respiratory disease in young people with cerebral palsy: consensus statement.

Respiratory illness is the leading cause of mortality in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Although risk factors for developing chronic respiratory illness have been identified, comprehensive clinical care recommendations for the prevention and management of respiratory illness do not currently exist. We invited over 200 clinicians and researchers from multiple disciplines with expertise in the management of respiratory illness in children with CP to develop care recommendations using a modified Delphi method on the basis of the RAND Corporation-University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method. These recommendations are intended for use by the wide range of practitioners who care for individuals living with CP. They provide a framework for recognizing multifactorial primary and secondary potentially modifiable risk factors and for providing coordinated multidisciplinary care. We describe the methods used to generate the consensus recommendations, and the overall perspective on assessment, prevention, and treatment of respiratory illness in children with CP. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: The first consensus statement for preventing and managing respiratory disease in cerebral palsy (CP). Risk factors for respiratory disease in CP should be identified early. Individuals with CP at risk of respiratory disease require regular assessment of risk factors. Effective partnerships between multidisciplinary teams, individuals with CP, and families are essential. Treatment of respiratory disease in individuals with CP must be proactive.

La enfermedad respiratoria es la principal causa de mortalidad en niños con parálisis cerebral (PC). Aunque se han identificado los factores de riesgo para desarrollar enfermedades respiratorias crónicas, actualmente no existen recomendaciones completas de atención clínica para la prevención y el tratamiento de las enfermedades respiratorias. Invitamos a más de 200 médicos e investigadores de múltiples disciplinas con experiencia en el manejo de enfermedades respiratorias en niños con PC para desarrollar recomendaciones de atención utilizando un método Delphi modificado sobre la base del Método de adecuación RAND Corporation - Universidad de California en Los Ángeles. Estas recomendaciones están destinadas a ser utilizadas por la amplia gama de profesionales que atienden a personas que viven con PC. Proporcionan un marco para reconocer factores de riesgo multifactoriales primarios y secundarios potencialmente modificables y para proporcionar atención coordinada multidisciplinaria. Describimos los métodos utilizados para generar las recomendaciones de consenso, y la perspectiva general sobre la evaluación, prevención y tratamiento de enfermedades respiratorias de niños con PC.

Doença respiratória é a principal causa de mortalidade em crianças com paralisia cerebral (PC). Embora fatores de risco para desenvolver doença respiratória crônica tenham sido identificados, recomendações abrangentes de cuidado clínico e gerenciamento de doença respiratória não existem atualmente. Convidamos cerca de 200 clínicos e pesquisadores de múltiplas disciplinas com experiência no manejo de doença respiratória em crianças com PC para desenvolver recomendações de cuidado usando um método Delphi com base no método de Apropriação da Corporação RAND - Universidade da Califórnia. Estas recomendações são para uso de profissionais que atendem indivíduos com PC. Elas oferecem uma estrutura para reconhecer fatores de risco multifatoriais potencialmente modificáveis e prover cuidado multidisciplinar. Descrevemos métodos usados para gerar as recomendações do consenso, e a perspectiva geral de avaliação, prevenção e tratamento de doença respiratória em crianças com PC.

Association Between Preoperative Statin Use and Respiratory Complications After Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Statins possess pleiotropic effects, which potentially benefit noncardiovascular conditions. Previous work suggests that statins reduce inflammation and prevent acute respiratory distress syndrome and infections. However, there is a paucity of data regarding potential benefits of statins on respiratory and infectious complications, particularly after noncardiac surgery. We therefore evaluated respiratory and other complications in noncardiac surgery patients taking or not taking statins preoperatively. METHODS: We obtained data from the Cleveland Clinic Perioperative Health Documentation System and evaluated medical records of 92,139 inpatients who had noncardiac surgery. Among these, 31,719 patients took statins preoperatively. Statin patients were compared to nonstatin patients on incidence of intraoperative use of albuterol and postoperative respiratory complications for primary analysis. Infectious complications, cardiovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and duration of hospitalization were compared for secondary analyses, using inverse probability of treatment weighting to control for potential confounding. RESULTS: Statin use was associated with lower odds of intraoperative albuterol treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89; 97.5% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-0.97; P = .001; number needed to treat [NNT] = 216). Postoperative respiratory complications were also less common (OR = 0.82; 98.75% CI, 0.78-0.87; P < .001). Secondarily, statin use was associated with lower odds of infections, cardiovascular complications, in-hospital mortality, and shorter duration of hospitalization. The interaction between statin use and sex was significant (with significance criteria P < .10) for all primary and secondary outcomes except intraoperative use of albuterol. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative statin use in noncardiac surgical patients was associated with slightly reduced odds of postoperative respiratory, infectious, and cardiovascular complications. However, the NNTs were high. Thus, despite the fact that statins appeared to be associated with lower odds of various complications, especially cardiovascular complications, our results do not support using statins specifically to reduce noncardiovascular complications after noncardiac surgery.

A comparison of laryngeal mask airway-supreme and endotracheal tube use with respect to airway protection in patients undergoing septoplasty: a randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There are doubts among anesthesiologists on the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in nasal surgeries because of concerns about the occurrence of blood leakages to the airway. We hypothesized that the use of LMA-Supreme (LMA-S) in nasal surgery is comparable with endotracheal tube (ETT) according to airway protection against blood leakage through the fiberoptic bronchoscopy, oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and postoperative adverse events. METHODS: The present study was conducted in a prospective, randomized, single-blind, controlled manner on 80 patients, who underwent septoplasty procedures under general anesthesia, after dividing them randomly into two groups according to the device used (LMA-S or ETT). The presence of blood in the airway (glottis/trachea, distal trachea) was analyzed with the fiberoptic bronchoscope and a four-point scale. Both groups were evaluated for OLP; HR; MAP; postoperative sore throat, nausea, and vomiting; dysphagia; and dysphonia. RESULTS: In the fiberoptic evaluation of the airway postoperatively, less blood leakage was detected in both anatomic areas in the LMA-S group than in the ETT group (glottis/trachea, p = 0.004; distal trachea, p = 0.034). Sore throat was detected less frequently in the LMA-S group at a significant level in the 2nd, 6th, and 12th hours of postoperative period; however, other adverse events were similar in both groups. Hemodynamic parameters were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate that the LMA-S provided more effective airway protection than the ETT in preventing blood leakage in the septoplasty procedures. We believe that the LMA-S can be used safely and as an alternative to the ETT in septoplasty cases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health ( ClinicalTrials.gov ) # NCT03903679 on April 5, 2019.

Respiratory Muscle Training Improves Strength and Decreases the Risk of Respiratory Complications in Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of respiratory muscle training in a population of stroke patients. DATA SOURCES: The following databases were searched for clinical trials through December 2019: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (N=9) published in English met the inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted and assessed for accuracy by 2 reviewers. Any disagreements were resolved after discussions with an independent third reviewer. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Cochrane bias tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis showed increased maximal inspiratory pressure (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-1.15; P<.001; 12-wk follow-up period: SMD, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.42-1.45; P<.001), maximal expiratory pressure (SMD, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.15-1.52; P=.017; 12-wk follow-up period: SMD, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.47-1.51; P<.001), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (SMD, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.57-2.24; P=.001), forced vital capacity (SMD, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.55-2.16; P<.001), peak expiratory flow (SMD, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.16-1.32; P=.013), 6-minute walk test (SMD, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.11-1.23; P=.020), and decreased respiratory complications (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-1.00; P=.050) compared with no respiratory intervention or a sham intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory muscle training improved poststroke muscle strength and the benefits were carried over for up to 12 weeks, including improved lung function, walking capacity, and a reduced risk of respiratory impediments.

Effects of low-dose intraoperative fentanyl on postoperative respiratory complication rate: a pre-specified, retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fentanyl is one of the most frequently administered intraoperative drugs and may increase the risk of postoperative respiratory complications (PRCs). METHODS: We performed a pre-specified analysis of 145 735 adult non-cardiac surgical cases under general anaesthesia. Using multivariable logistic regression, we evaluated the association of intraoperative fentanyl dose and PRCs within 3 days after surgery (defined as reintubation, respiratory failure, pneumonia, pulmonary oedema, or atelectasis). We examined effect modification by patient characteristics, surgical site, and anaesthetics used. RESULTS: PRCs within 3 days after surgery occurred in 18 839 (12.9%) patients. In comparison with high intraoperative fentanyl doses [median: 3.85; inter-quartile range (IQR): 3.42-4.50 µg kg-1, quartile 4 (Q4)], low intraoperative fentanyl dose [median: 0.80, IQR: 0.00-1.14 µg kg-1, quartile 1 (Q1)] was significantly associated with lower odds of PRCs [Q1 vs Q4: 10.9% vs 16.2%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.79; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.75-0.84; P<0.001; adjusted absolute risk difference (aARD) -1.7%]. This effect was augmented by thoracic surgery (P for interaction <0.001; aARD -6.2%), high doses of inhalation anaesthetics (P for interaction=0.016; aARD -2.2%) and neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) (P for interaction=0.001; aARD -3.4%). Exploratory analysis demonstrated that compared with no fentanyl, low-dose fentanyl was associated with lower rates of PRCs (decile 2 vs decile 1: aOR 0.82, CI 0.75-0.89, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative low-dose fentanyl (about 60-120 µg for a 70 kg patient) was associated with lower risk of postoperative respiratory complications compared with both no fentanyl and high-dose fentanyl. Beneficial effects of low-dose fentanyl were magnified in specific patient subgroups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03198208.

The Effects of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery on Respiratory Function in the Early Postoperative Period.

BACKGROUND:: Respiratory complications are common after cardiac surgery and the use of extracorporeal circulation is one of the main causes of lung injury. We hypothesized a better postoperative respiratory function in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCABG) as compared with "on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting" (ONCABG). METHODS:: This is a retrospective, single-center study at a cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) in a tertiary university hospital. Consecutive data on 339 patients undergoing elective CABG (n = 215 ONCABG, n = 124 OPCABG) were collected for 1 year from the ICU electronic medical records. We compared respiratory variables (Pao2, Pao2/Fio2 ratio, Sao2, and Paco2) at 7 predefined time points (ICU admission, postoperative hours 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24). We also evaluated time to extubation, rates of reintubation, and use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV). We used mixed-effects linear regression models (with time as random effect for clustering of repeated measures) adjusted for a predetermined set of covariates. RESULTS:: The values of Pao2 and Pao2/Fio2 were significantly higher in the OPCABG group only at ICU admission (mean differences: 9.7 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-16.2; and 27, 95% CI 6.1-47.7, respectively). The OPCABG group showed higher Paco2, overall ( P = .02) and at ICU admission (mean difference 1.8 mm Hg, 95% CI: 0.6-3), although mean values were always within normal range in both groups. No differences were seen in Sao2 values, time to extubation, rate of reintubation rate, and use of postoperative NIV. Extubation rate was higher in OPCABG only at postoperative hour 12 (92% vs ONCABG 82%, P = .02). CONCLUSION:: The OPCABG showed only marginal improvements of unlikely clinical meaning in oxygenation as compared to ONCABG in elective low-risk patients.

Effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training on physical functioning following esophagectomy.

This study aims to examine the effect of preoperative inspiratory muscle training (IMT) on pre- and postoperative functional exercise performance in patients undergoing esophagectomy. A subcohort of patients recruited to the PREPARE randomized control trial were studied. Following evaluation of respiratory muscle function (spirometry, maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and inspiratory muscle endurance), postoperative mobilization (accelerometry) and postoperative physical functioning (6-minute walk test (6MWT)), participants scheduled for esophagectomy were randomly assigned to either 2 weeks of preoperative IMT or a control group. Measures were repeated on the day before surgery and postoperatively. Sixty participants (mean (standard deviation) age 64.13 (7.8) years; n = 42 male; n = 43 transthoracic esophagectomy; n = 17 transhiatial esophagectomy) were included in the final analysis (n = 28 IMT; n = 32 control). There was a significant improvement in preoperative MIP (P = 0.03) and inspiratory muscle endurance (P = 0.04); however preoperative 6MWT distance did not change. Postoperatively, control participants were more active on postoperative day (POD)1, and from POD1-POD5 (P = 0.04). Predischarge, 6MWT distance was significantly lower in the IMT group (305.61 (116.3) m) compared to controls (380.2 (47.1) m, P = 0.03). Despite an increase in preoperative respiratory muscle function, preoperative IMT does not improve pre- or postoperative physical functioning or postoperative mobilization following esophagectomy.

A quality improvement project to reduce postoperative adverse respiratory events and increase safety in the postanesthesia care unit of a pediatric institution.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement methods can identify solutions and make dramatic improvements in patient safety during daily clinical care. The science of quality improvement in healthcare is still a very new concept in developing countries like China. AIMS: We initiated a quality improvement project to minimize adverse respiratory events in our postanesthesia care unit with the guidance of an experienced quality improvement expert from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. METHODS: We set up a quality improvement team that included anesthesia safety team members at Shanghai Children's Medical Center, and a quality improvement expert in pediatric anesthesia from Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. Data from the previous year were reviewed. After using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis to access risks associated with the current process, a Key Driver Diagram and a Smart Aim were developed. Key drivers included establishing a safety culture, resource allocation to meet needs, education and training, standardization of care, improved communication and handoff, and enhanced detection, recognition, and response to adverse events. Using Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles of the improvement model, interventions were conducted to improve the process. The primary outcome was the percentage of postoperative respiratory adverse events in the postanesthesia care unit, and we calculated the average recovery time as a balancing measure. Data were collected and analyzed using a run chart and control chart. RESULTS: The median percentage of respiratory adverse events in postanesthesia care unit decreased from 2.8% to 1.4%. Respiratory adverse events were reduced by over 30% compared to the previous period with no significant change in mean recovery time. CONCLUSION: Using quality improvement methods, we successfully reduced the percentage of respiratory adverse events in the postanesthesia care unit. This helped to establish a safety culture among the anesthesia staff. Quality and safety improvement can be successfully implemented in developing countries like China with collaboration with quality improvement experts from more experienced institutions.

Impact of immunization against OxLDL on the pulmonary response to cigarette smoke exposure in mice.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoke exposure can affect pulmonary lipid homeostasis and cause a progressive increase in pulmonary antibodies against oxidized low-density lipoproteins (OxLDL). Similarly, increased anti-OxLDL antibodies are observed in atherosclerosis, a pathology also tightly associated with smoking and lipid homeostasis disruption. Several immunization strategies against oxidized lipid species to help with their clearance have been shown to reduce the formation of atherosclerotic lesions. Since oxidized lipids are generated during cigarette smoke exposure, we investigated the impact of a prophylactic immunization protocol against OxLDL on the pulmonary effects of cigarette smoke exposure in mice. METHODS: Mice were immunized systemically with a mixture of human OxLDL (antigen source) and AddaVax (adjuvant) or PBS alone prior to the initiation of acute (2 week) or sub-chronic (8 weeks) cigarette smoke exposure protocols. Anti-OxLDL antibodies were measured in the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and serum by direct ELISA. Pulmonary impacts of cigarette smoke exposure and OxLDL immunization were assessed by measuring BAL inflammatory cells, lung functions, and changes in lung structure and gene levels of matrix/matrix-related genes. RESULTS: Immunization to OxLDL led to a marked increase in circulating and pulmonary antibodies against OxLDL that persisted during cigarette smoke exposure. OxLDL immunization did not exacerbate or reduce the inflammatory response following acute or sub-chronic exposure to cigarette smoke. OxLDL immunization alone had effects similar to cigarette smoke exposure on lung functions but OxLDL immunization and cigarette smoke exposure had no additive effects on these parameters. No obvious changes in lung histology, airspace or levels of matrix and matrix-related genes were caused by OxLDL immunization compared to vehicle treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study shows for the first time that a prophylactic immunization protocol against OxLDL can potentially have detrimental effects lung functions, without having additive effects over cigarette smoke exposure. This work sheds light on a complex dynamic between anti-OxLDL antibodies and the pulmonary response to cigarette smoke exposure.

Variable versus conventional lung protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery (PROVAR): a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Experimental studies showed that controlled variable ventilation (CVV) yielded better pulmonary function compared to non-variable ventilation (CNV) in injured lungs. We hypothesized that CVV improves intraoperative and postoperative respiratory function in patients undergoing open abdominal surgery. METHODS: Fifty patients planned for open abdominal surgery lasting >3 h were randomly assigned to receive either CVV or CNV. Mean tidal volumes and PEEP were set at 8 ml kg-1 (predicted body weight) and 5 cm H2O, respectively. In CVV, tidal volumes varied randomly, following a normal distribution, on a breath-by-breath basis. The primary endpoint was the forced vital capacity (FVC) on postoperative Day 1. Secondary endpoints were oxygenation, non-aerated lung volume, distribution of ventilation, and pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications until postoperative Day 5. RESULTS: FVC did not differ significantly between CVV and CNV on postoperative Day 1, 61.5 (standard deviation 22.1) % vs 61.9 (23.6) %, respectively; mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] difference, -0.4 (-13.2-14.0), P=0.95. Intraoperatively, CVV did not result in improved respiratory function, haemodynamics, or redistribution of ventilation compared to CNV. Postoperatively, FVC, forced expiratory volume at the first second (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC deteriorated, while atelectasis volume and plasma levels of interleukin-6 and interleukin-8 increased, but values did not differ between groups. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary and extrapulmonary complications was comparable in CVV and CNV. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing open abdominal surgery, CVV did not improve intraoperative and postoperative respiratory function compared with CNV. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT 01683578.

Respiratory Complications After Colorectal Surgery: Avoidable or Fate?

BACKGROUND: The prevention of post-operative pulmonary complications (PPC) is targeted by several enhanced recovery (ERAS) items including early mobilisation, prevention of fluid overload and omission of routine nasogastric tubes. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of ERAS on PPC. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of an institutional database including consecutive colorectal ERAS procedures from May 2011 until May 2017. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify risk factors for PPC among demographic, surgical characteristics and items related to the ERAS protocol. RESULTS: In total, 1298 patients were included; among them 120 (9.2%) had one or more PPC. Multivariable analysis retained minimally invasive surgery [odds ratio (OR) 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15-0.46] and compliance to the ERAS protocol of ≥ 70% (OR 0.53; CI 0.30-0.94) as protective factors. Emergency surgery (OR 2.70; CI 1.20-6.01), blood loss of ≥ 200 mL (OR 2.06; CI 1.20-3.53) and ASA score of ≥ 3 (OR 2.00; CI 1.12-3.57) were independent risk factors. Median length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who experienced respiratory complications (21 [4-183] vs. 6 [1-95] days, p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery and high compliance with the ERAS protocol can help to prevent PPC.

Respiratory complications of anaesthesia.

Postoperative pulmonary complications are a major determinant of outcome for patients and consume huge resources within hospital, particularly in critical care. Prediction and anticipation of postoperative pulmonary complications are vital for patient selection and, in some cases, for informed patient consent. Being able to assess the likelihood of postoperative pulmonary complications also allows research into methods to reduce them by allowing allocation of patients to the appropriate arms of research trials. Some patients have pre-operative characteristics or belong to patient groups such as those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or obstructive sleep apnoea, where techniques and evidence-based guidance to avoid or reduce complications are becoming established. Intra-operative ventilation and the use of lung-protective ventilation may be helpful during major surgery, but studies looking at reduced tidal volumes, recruitment and levels of positive end-expiratory pressure, have this far only led to a degree of consensus in terms of tidal volume, although parameters that predispose to postoperative pulmonary complications are becoming clearer. Optimal postoperative care in terms of analgesia, positioning, physiotherapy and mobilisation is another developing area. Techniques such as continuous positive airways pressure, non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal humidified oxygen appear to show some benefit, but the exact roles, pressures and timings of each are currently being explored. Much remains to be researched and developed into evidence-based practice.

The effect of high-flow nasal oxygen on hospital length of stay in cardiac surgical patients at high risk for respiratory complications: a randomised controlled trial.

There has been increased interest in the prophylactic and therapeutic use of high-flow nasal oxygen in patients with, or at risk of, non-hypercapnic respiratory failure. There are no randomised trials examining the efficacy of high-flow nasal oxygen in high-risk cardiac surgical patients. We sought to determine whether routine administration of high-flow nasal oxygen, compared with standard oxygen therapy, leads to reduced hospital length of stay after cardiac surgery in patients with pre-existing respiratory disease at high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. Adult patients with pre-existing respiratory disease undergoing elective cardiac surgery were randomly allocated to receive high-flow nasal oxygen (n = 51) or standard oxygen therapy (n = 49). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay and all analyses were carried out on an intention-to-treat basis. Median (IQR [range]) hospital length of stay was 7 (6-9 [4-30]) days in the high-flow nasal oxygen group and 9 (7-16 [4-120]) days in the standard oxygen group (p=0.012). Geometric mean hospital length of stay was 29% lower in the high-flow nasal group (95%CI 11-44%, p = 0.004). High-flow nasal oxygen was also associated with fewer intensive care unit re-admissions (1/49 vs. 7/45; p = 0.026). When compared with standard care, prophylactic postoperative high-flow nasal oxygen reduced hospital length of stay and intensive care unit re-admission. This is the first randomised controlled trial examining the effect of prophylactic high-flow nasal oxygen use on patient-centred outcomes in cardiac surgical patients at high risk for postoperative respiratory complications.

Lack of Association between Preoperative Statin Use and Respiratory and Neurologic Complications after Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Statins may reduce the risk of pulmonary and neurologic complications after cardiac surgery. METHODS: The authors acquired data for adults who had coronary artery bypass graft, valve surgery, or combined procedures. The authors matched patients who took statins preoperatively to patients who did not. First, the authors assessed the association between preoperative statin use and the primary outcomes of prolonged ventilation (more than 24 h), pneumonia (positive cultures of sputum, transtracheal fluid, bronchial washings, and/or clinical findings consistent with the diagnosis of pneumonia), and in-hospital all-cause mortality, using logistic regressions. Second, the authors analyzed the collapsed composite of neurologic complications using logistic regression. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Among 14,129 eligible patients, 6,642 patients were successfully matched. There was no significant association between preoperative statin use and prolonged ventilation (statin: 408/3,321 [12.3%] vs. nonstatin: 389/3,321 [11.7%]), pneumonia (44/3,321 [1.3%] vs. 54/3,321 [1.6%]), and in-hospital mortality (52/3,321 [1.6%] vs. 43/3,321 [1.3%]). The estimated odds ratio was 1.06 (98.3% CI, 0.88 to 1.27) for prolonged ventilation, 0.81 (0.50 to 1.32) for pneumonia, and 1.21 (0.74 to 1.99) for in-hospital mortality. Neurologic outcomes were not associated with preoperative statin use (53/3,321 [1.6%] vs. 56/3,321 [1.7%]), with an odds ratio of 0.95 (0.60 to 1.50). The length of intensive care unit and hospital stay was also not associated with preoperative statin use, with a hazard ratio of 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) for length of hospital stay and 1.00 (0.94 to 1.06) for length of intensive care unit stay. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative statin use did not reduce pulmonary or neurologic complications after cardiac surgery.

Premedication with salbutamol prior to surgery does not decrease the risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events in school-aged children.

BACKGROUND: Perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAE) remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the paediatric population. This double-blinded randomized control trial investigated whether inhaled salbutamol premedication decreased the occurrence of PRAE in children identified as being at high risk of PRAE. METHODS: Children with at least two parentally reported risk factors for PRAE undergoing elective surgery were eligible for recruitment. They were randomized to receive either salbutamol (200 µg) or placebo prior to their surgery and PRAE (bronchospasm, laryngospasm, airway obstruction, desaturation, coughing and stridor) were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 470 children (6-16 yr, 277 males, 59%) recruited, 462 were available for an intention-to-treat analysis. Thirty-two (14%) and 27 (12%) children from the placebo and salbutamol groups experienced PRAE. This difference was not significant [odds ratio (OR): 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-1.44, P : 0.51]. Oxygen desaturation [14/232 (6%) vs 14/230 (6%), OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.47-2.17, P : 0.98] and severe coughing [12/232 (5%) vs 10/230 (4%), OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.35-1.97, P : 0.68] were the most common PRAE, but did not significantly differ between the groups. The occurrence of PRAE was slightly lower in children with respiratory symptoms who received salbutamol compared with placebo [16/134 (12%) vs 21/142 (15%), OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.38-2.26, P : 0.87], but was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with salbutamol to children aged between 6 and 16 years and at high risk of PRAE prior to their surgery did not reduce their risk of PRAE. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12612000626864 ( www.anzctr.org.au ).

Perioperative management of hepatectomy in patients with interstitial pneumonia: a report of three cases and a literature review.

PURPOSE: Interstitial pneumonia (IP) is a progressive and irreversible fibrosis and can be fatal if acute exacerbation (AE) occurs. While a useful risk-scoring system has been established for lung surgery, no risk evaluation exists for AE of IP related to non-pulmonary surgery. The objective of this review is to describe the management for patients with IP. METHODS: We experienced three hepatectomy cases with IP. The first was a 72-year-old male patient diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) revealed IP with reticular shadow at the base of both lungs. After hepatectomy, his IP became acutely exacerbated and did not improve with steroid or sivelestat treatment. The second was a 74-year-old male patient diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma, and the third was a 75-year-old male patient with liver metastasis. In both these cases, CT revealed a reticular shadow in the lung fields, with increased serum KL-6 levels. We administered pirfenidone for perioperative management, during which time no respiratory complications occurred. RESULTS: Perioperative management with pirfenidone for hepatectomy accompanied by IP was successful in our cases. CONCLUSION: We reviewed reports on the perioperative prevention, intraoperative risk factors, and treatment of postoperative AE of IP and summarized the perioperative management techniques for IP patients undergoing non-pulmonary surgery.

[Respiratory Rehabilitation to Reduce Respiratory Complications after Cardiovascular Surgery].

The number of cardiovascular surgical operations has been increasing, accompanied by an increase in the number of patients with an aging patient and various comorbidities. For this reason, the risk of respiratory complications after cardiovascular surgery is high, and ingenuity to alleviate this is necessary. We evaluated preoperative respiratory function and examined whether there is a difference in the onset of postoperative respiratory complications with or without respiratory rehabilitation from preoperative. As a result, the incidence of respiratory complications was significantly reduced in the group subjected to preoperative respiratory rehabilitation. Also, the intensive care unit stay was significantly shortened. From this, it is important to perform respiratory rehabilitation from preoperative time. And as a breathing exercise method, active cycle breathing technique is safe and highly effective.