Sun pain and solar dysesthesia: A new challenge in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: A few patients report intense pain and other unpleasant sensations, such as burning, dysesthesia and hyperalgesia, after even brief exposure to the sun and in the absence of any skin lesion. Sometimes they also develop systemic symptoms, such as mild fever, fatigue, faintness and fainting. As a result, these patients carefully avoid even short-term sun exposure with a consequent severe negative impact on their lives. METHODS: We have reviewed the clinical findings and the results of photobiological investigations of 10 patients who presented this clinical picture. Six of these patients were previously described by our group with the diagnosis of sun pain. We have reviewed the similarities with other previously described disorders such as solar dysesthesia and PUVA pain and have evaluated possible pathogenetic mechanisms. RESULTS: During phototesting our patients experienced intense pain in the exposed area and in the surrounding skin, without any visible lesion, even with very low sub-erythemal doses. At follow-up, five patients were diagnosed with fibromyalgia, three with a major depressive disorder, one with bipolar syndrome and one with a conversion disorder. The pathogenesis remains unclear, but the use of a psychopharmacological treatment with antidepressants improved both the neuropsychiatric symptoms and sensitivity to the sun in most subjects. CONCLUSION: For patients with pain and other severe symptoms in the absence of skin lesions and clinical and laboratory manifestations of known photodermatoses, a neuropsychiatric evaluation should be suggested.

Utility of iPhone-Based Pupillometry in Comparing Pupillary Dynamics Between Sport Concussed Subjects With Photosensitivity and Healthy Controls.

BACKGROUND: To compare the pupillary dynamics using an iPhone-based pupillometry technique in subjects with sports concussion with photosensitivity and aged-matched controls. METHODS: Fifty subjects with sports concussion were compared with 50 aged-matched healthy controls. Athletes with persistent concussive symptoms for 1 year or more after the initial injury were included. All the subjects underwent a Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) administration followed by pupillary dynamics measurement using an iPhone-based application (Reflex-Pro PLR analyzer). RESULTS: The mean age was 27 ± 4 years in the concussed group and 26 ± 5 years in the control group. In subjects with concussion, there was a significant decrease in the mean of the following parameters: average constriction speed (1.10 ± 0.15 vs 1.78 ± 0.12 mm/s; P < 0.001), maximum constriction speed (2.05 ± 0.26 vs 3.84 ± 0.28 mm/s; P < 0.001), average diameter (3.64 ± 0.12 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 mm; P < 0.001), maximum diameter (4.75 ± 0.17 vs 5.23 ± 0.16 mm; P < 0.001), and minimum diameter (2.75 ± 0.17 vs 3.64 ± 0.11 mm; P < 0.001). An increase in the following parameters was noted in concussion vs age-matched controls: dilation release amplitude (0.54 ± 0.96 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 mm; P < 0.001) and latency (0.25 ± 0.05 vs 0.21 ± 0.02 s; P < 0.001). Subjects with concussion with photosensitivity exhibited increased dilation release amplitudes ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with sport concussion had impairment in pupillary constriction velocities, latency, and diameter in more than 1 year after concussion. The increase in dilation release amplitude among subjects with concussion might serve as a biomarker in diagnosing the underlying symptom of photosensitivity. The iPhone-based pupillometry could serve as a convenient and diagnostic tool in diagnosing these symptoms.

Facial clues to the photosensitive trichothiodystrophy phenotype in childhood.

Among genodermatoses, trichothiodystrophies (TTDs) are a rare genetically heterogeneous group of syndromic conditions, presenting with skin, hair, and nail abnormalities. An extra-cutaneous involvement (craniofacial district and neurodevelopment) can be also a part of the clinical picture. The presence of photosensitivity describes three forms of TTDs: MIM#601675 (TTD1), MIM#616390 (TTD2) and MIM#616395 (TTD3), that are caused by variants afflicting some components of the DNA Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) complex and with more marked clinical consequences. In the present research, 24 frontal images of paediatric patients with photosensitive TTDs suitable for facial analysis through the next-generation phenotyping (NGP) technology were obtained from the medical literature. The pictures were compared to age and sex-matched to unaffected controls using 2 distinct deep-learning algorithms: DeepGestalt and GestaltMatcher (Face2Gene, FDNA Inc., USA). To give further support to the observed results, a careful clinical revision was undertaken for each facial feature in paediatric patients with TTD1 or TTD2 or TTD3. Interestingly, a distinctive facial phenotype emerged by the NGP analysis delineating a specific craniofacial dysmorphic spectrum. In addition, we tabulated every single detail within the observed cohort. The novelty of the present research includes the facial characterization in children with the photosensitive types of TTDs through the 2 different algorithms. This result can become additional criteria for early diagnosis, and for subsequent targeted molecular investigations as well as a possible tailored multidisciplinary personalized management.

Equipment developed for simplifying routine phototesting in dermatology.

Some people react abnormally when exposed to sunlight by getting easily burned or develop a rash. When testing a patient's level of photosensitivity in the clinic, the UVR dose to provoke erythema is determined by the minimal erythema dose (MED) test. Subsequently, a photoprovocation test is performed to detect abnormal skin reactions by daily exposing the skin to UVR for several consecutive days. Associated problems in MED testing include choice of an even skin area for testing, patients keeping still during the test, testing with different UVR doses simultaneously, and securing clear borders of erythema. To address these issues, a MED Test Patch was developed which adheres closely to the skin to ensure sharp erythema borders and provides six irradiation fields with decremental doses of 20%. For MED testing, we constructed a solar simulator and LED lamps with peak emissions at 309 and 370 nm, small enough to be mounted directly on to the MED Test Patch and accommodate patient movements. These lamps and a 415 nm LED can also be used for provocation testing which is best performed on the back where the skin is assumed to have identical UVR sensitivity, and the area is large enough for adjacent MED and provocation test fields. Reading of erythema is still performed by visual and tactile evaluation. The UVA and UVB MED test can be performed in 1 h. The advantage of these developments is an easy-to-use, standardized test method with improved accuracy of the results.

Clinical characteristics of patients with human immunodeficiency virus and immune-mediated photodermatoses: A retrospective study of 39 patients.

BACKGROUND: HIV/AIDS patients are susceptible to various infectious and inflammatory dermatoses. No systemic work has been done on HIV/AIDS patients with immune-mediated photodermatoses in China. Here, we aim to determine the clinical features of immune-mediated photodermatoses in HIV/AIDS patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of HIV/AIDS patients with immune-mediated photodermatoses was carried out with demographic data, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and follow-up data at the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University between 2012 and 2019. The data were subjected to statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 39 HIV/AIDS patients with immune-mediated photodermatoses were enrolled, including 22 cases of polymorphic light eruption (PLE), 16 cases of chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD), and one actinic reticuloid. The CD4 count at the visit of the HIV-positive CAD group was lower than the PLE group (p = .049). The HIV-positive CAD group was more sensitive toward UVB than the PLE group (p = .020) and had a lower MED-UVB value (p = .044). There was no significant difference in UV tests among different categories of skin types. CONCLUSION: Immune-mediated photodermatoses are a manifestation of the advanced symptom of HIV infection, and sometimes also the presenting feature of HIV infection. Compared with HIV-positive PLE patients, CAD patients showed higher sensitivity to UVB radiation and had a lower MED-UVB value. The primary treatment for immune-mediated photodermatoses in HIV/AIDS patients is HAART and sun avoidance.

Chronic actinic dermatitis: A 5-year clinical analysis of 488 patients in China.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD) is a spectrum of diseases with chronic photosensitivity occurring mostly among middle-aged and older men. We seek to explore the characteristics and pathogenesis of CAD among the Chinese population. METHODS: The medical records of 488 CAD cases diagnosed by phototesting at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University from January 2014 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Among the 488 patients, 344 were male and 144 were female. 84.8% of the cases were over 40 years old at the age of onset, while the remaining with an early age of onset had a prevalence of atopic history of 21.6%. Up to 45.0% of the patients reported excessive sun exposure and outdoor activities before the initiation of symptoms. The typical skin lesions were erythema, papules and plaques laid predominantly in sun-exposed areas. 42.8% of the cases showed sensitivity to UVB only, 20.7% were both sensitive to UVA and UVB, and 18.2% had UVA sensitivity only. The most predominant photoallergens were chlorpromazine (80.1%), thimerosal (17.2%), potassium dichromate (12.7%), etc. The most prevalent patch test allergens were potassium dichromate (24.4%), thimerosal (20.5%), formaldehyde (16.8%), etc. CONCLUSIONS: CAD was more commonly seen in males over 40 years old. The action spectrum of Chinese patients is primarily in the UVB range. Exposure to excessive sunlight or contact allergens and photoallergens are important risk factors. Photobiology tests are essential in detecting photosensitivity and recognizing potential photosensitizers. Early avoidance of confirmed photoallergens and sun exposure may prevent photosensitive reactions from progressing into persistent photosensitivity.

[Current problems of polypharmacy in geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity.]

The article presents an overview of the current problems of polypharmacy in geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity. The article contains information about emerging adverse drug reactions, as well as methods for diagnosing, correcting and preventing phototoxic and photoallergic reactions in patients of older age groups. The main aspects of dermatological support in the system of long-term care for geriatric patients when taking drugs with a risk of photosensitivity are outlined. Clinical signs of senile xerosis and skin manifestations of adverse drug reactions were studied when taking drugs with the risk of photosensitization before and after the use of a photoprotector in elderly patients.

Photodermatoses: what's new.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize and highlight the recent literature in photodermatoses. In the past year, there have been many developments in this heterogeneous group of conditions. RECENT FINDINGS: This review is divided by photodermatoses type, which include idiopathic photodermatoses, photodermatoses secondary to exogenous agents, photodermatoses secondary to endogenous agents (the porphyrias), and genodermatoses. The idiopathic photodermatoses section focuses on case series and reports highlighting new disease presentations or further disease characterization and new treatment strategies for these disorders. The second section discusses a unique case and has a brief update on photoallergens. Clinical, diagnostic, and treatment updates for porphyrias are discussed in Section 3. For genodermatoses, we discuss complications and neoplastic risk of xeroderma pigmentosum and a few highlights from other rare disorders. Finally, we conclude with a brief overview of photoprotection updates, from assessing sun-damaged skin to the most effective photoprotective agents. SUMMARY: Up-to-date information will help providers identify and manage this rare group of disorders.

Contribution of phototesting in the diagnosis of photodermatoses: Retrospective study of 100 cases.

BACKGROUND: Photodermatoses are sun-related inflammatory skin diseases. They usually require phototesting in diagnosis. However, fewer and fewer medical centers in France are equipped with photobiological equipment. OBJECTIVES: The main purpose was to evaluate the relevance of phototesting in photodermatosis diagnosis. The second goal was to study the proportions of the different kinds of photodermatosis found in this particular study. METHODS: This study was descriptive, retrospective, and mono-centric. It was based on 100 consecutive patients, who have been phototested in a French University Hospital from 2014 to 2018. Phototesting included determination of the minimal erythematous dose (MED), UVA and UVB phototests, and photopatch testing. RESULTS: The use of phototesting led to 60% of photodermatosis diagnosis and formally eliminated the latter in 13% of the cases. The diagnosis remained undetermined in 27% of the cases. Nineteen cases of polymorphous light eruption (PLE), 14 cases of photocontact dermatitis (PCD), 10 cases of solar urticaria, 8 cases of photo-aggravated atopic eczema, 5 cases of chronic actinic dermatitis, and 2 cases of systemic photosensitization were diagnosed. The allergens involved in PCD were topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in 9 cases, sunscreens in 3 cases, and fragrance in 2 cases. The average amount of time between the first symptoms and actual phototesting was about 7,5 years. CONCLUSION: This study confirms phototesting is truly useful. PLE was the most common form of photodermatosis, followed by PCD and solar urticaria. As photodermatosis could imply severe diseases sometimes requiring hospitalization, it is critical to maintain this expertise.

Anticancer treatments and photosensitivity.

Drug-induced photosensitivity is associated with a wide range of anticancer treatments, including conventional chemotherapeutic agents, targeted anticancer therapies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. These dermatologic adverse events can have a major impact on the well-being and quality of life of cancer patients, leading to dose modifications and interruption or discontinuation of anticancer treatments in severe cases. However, the heterogeneous nature of the photosensitive reactions induced by these agents, as well as the common concomitant use of other potentially photosensitizing drugs (antibiotics, voriconazole, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, etc.), can make the diagnosis and, therefore the prevention, of these adverse events particularly challenging. The aim of this review is to describe the most characteristic forms of photosensitivity observed in patients being treated with anticancer treatments, including phototoxicity and photoallergy, and other potentially photo-induced manifestations such as UV recall, exaggerated sunburn reactions associated with treatment-related vitiligo, drug-induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus, and UV-induced hyperpigmentation. We also discuss the photosensitive reactions recently reported with new-generation targeted anticancer therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors and highlight the importance of continued surveillance to identify photosensitizing agents, and of educating patients on the need for preventive UVA/UVB photoprotective measures.

The Immunogenetics of Photodermatoses.

Photodermatosis is an abnormal skin inflammatory reaction to light. The major classifications of photodermatoses are idiopathic photodermatoses, photodermatoses due to exogenous or endogenous agents, photo-exacerbated dermatoses, and photosensitive genodermatoses. In this chapter, we focus on idiopathic photodermatoses and drug-related photodermatoses and emphasize on the epidemiology and immunogenetic backgrounds. Idiopathic photodermatoses, a spectrum of diseases with abnormal responses to ultraviolet radiation (UVR), include polymorphous light eruption, actinic prurigo, hydroa vacciniforme, chronic actinic dermatitis, and solar urticaria. Young people are more susceptible to most idiopathic photodermatoses except for chronic actinic dermatitis. Interestingly, idiopathic photodermatoses exhibit different characteristics between Caucasians and Asians. For example, the average age of Asian actinic prurigo patients is older than that of Caucasians in which genetic backgrounds or Fitzpatrick skin type might play a role. Drug-induced photodermatoses can be classified into phototoxic and photoallergic drug reactions. Certain drug-induced photodermatoses may mimic other dermatoses. For instance, drug-induced lupus erythematosus (LE) should be considered if an old man is diagnosed with LE but had a poor response to standard treatments.

Benzodiazepine-induced photosensitivity reactions: A compilation of cases from literature review with Naranjo causality assessment.

OBJECTIVE: Benzodiazepines have been reported to cause photosensitivity reactions. We characterized the clinical presentation and diagnosis of benzodiazepine-associated photosensitivity and adjudicated these cases for a causal association with benzodiazepines. METHODS: A literature search on PubMed's "MeSH" search feature and CINAHL (1964 to 2019) was performed using search terms: benzodiazepine, photosensitivity, and photosensitivity disorders/chemically induced. We applied the Naranjo scale, a standardized causality assessment algorithm, to identified cases. RESULTS: We identified eight published cases, with 50% of patients being female with a mean age of 46.3 years. Alprazolam, tetrazepam, clobazam, and clorazepate induced phototoxic reactions. Chlordiazepoxide induced one photoallergic reaction. Photosensitivity occurred between 1-3 days (37.5%), 7-14 days (25%), and >14 days (25%). Photosensitivity resolved after drug discontinuation within 2 weeks (62.5%). Benzodiazepine rechallenge confirmed photosensitivity in 75% of cases. Photopatch testing was negative in two patients; however, these patients had positive oral provocation testing. However, an oral photoprovocation test, an ideal diagnostic test, was not administered to several patients. Despite these challenges, the Naranjo scale identified 5 cases as definite benzodiazepine-induced photosensitivity. CONCLUSION: Five benzodiazepines induced photosensitivity reactions. Five patients showed a definite association with the Naranjo scale. Reporting to pharmacovigilance databases may help identify other benzodiazepines causing photosensitivity reactions.

Isolated solar angioedema: A systematic review of the literature.

Solar urticaria is a well-recognized photodermatosis, sometimes accompanied by angioedema. However, isolated solar angioedema (ISA) is a rare and unrecognized entity. The purpose of our work was to systematically review the available data on ISA. Therefore, a systematic review of studies evaluating ISA was performed. Additionally, a case of a 21-years-old patient from our photodermatosis service is presented. The search yielded 421 publications, with 3 eligible for review. Together with our case, 5 cases were included overall. All patients were female. Four out of 5 patients first experienced ISA at childhood or early adulthood (age range 6-22 years). UVA photoprovocation was positive in the 3 out of the 4 patients who were tested. Improvement was noted following NB-UVB hardening (2 out of 5 patients) or a short course of oral prednisone (3 out of 5 patients) combined with regular sunscreen application. To conclude, ISA is an extremely rare entity, although it may be underdiagnosed due to lack of awareness. The clinician must consider ISA in the differential diagnosis of angioedema since it can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Besides sun avoidance, there is no consensus regarding treatment.

A new approach to actinic folliculitis: prophylactic narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: We have observed an increasing number of patients referred to the Scottish Photobiology Service (SPS), who were later diagnosed with actinic folliculitis (AF) and had positive phototesting results. Treatment options for AF are limited, with only a few reports in the literature. The use of prophylactic narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy for AF has not previously been described, and we report on this for the first time. AIM: To analyse the clinical characteristics, phototesting results and responses to treatment for patients with AF diagnosed by the SPS. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective review over 10 years of all case notes of patients who were assessed and diagnosed with AF through the SPS, based at the Photobiology Unit, Dundee, UK. RESULTS: All 10 patients were women. Mean age of onset was 25 years and mean time to referral for investigation was 7 years. The commonest site involved was the face, with the main clinical feature being monomorphic pustules appearing after sunlight exposure. The eruption could be provoked with iterative doses of broadband UVA irradiation in five patients. All patients were offered photoprotective advice and prophylactic NB-UVB phototherapy. Five patients proceeded with phototherapy; four of these completed the desensitization course and all four reported either a delay in symptom onset or total prevention of rash induction, with complete efficacy of desensitization maintained for 3 years in one patient. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the successful use of UVA provocation testing as a diagnostic tool in AF. Additionally, we recommend the use of prophylactic NB-UVB phototherapy in AF as an effective and well-tolerated approach.

Juvenile spring eruption among soldiers: A report of a large outbreak.

Juvenile spring eruption is a rare photodermatosis characterised by papules and vesicles appeared on the helix of the ears. A combination of environmental factors including sunlight and cold has been postulated in the pathogenesis. Herein, 58 soldiers with juvenile spring eruption from a single military unit are reported and the characteristics of other reported outbreaks among soldiers are reviewed. [Correction added on 14th November 2020, after first online publication: "The last sentence of the abstract section has been revised."].

'More extraordinary than mundane ' A phenomenological analysis of the experiences of individuals living with CLE and their taking care in the sun.

INTRODUCTION: CLE is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune condition of which photosensitivity is a major symptom. Individuals living with CLE are advised to practice photoprotection. Despite the benefits for disease control, many individuals living with CLE do not practice optimal photoprotection. The aim of this study was to gain a deep insight into the lived experiences of individuals with CLE and their photoprotective practices. METHODS: A qualitative study approach was conducted, using Hermeneutic phenomenology. Individuals living with CLE were recruited and interviewed. Rich pictures were used to enrich the interviews. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using Template Analysis. RESULTS: Analysis revealed four themes: 'Much more than just a photosensitive skin condition', 'The impact of sun on CLE and social dynamics', 'Drifting to the sun: personal transitions and social norms' and 'Taking care in the sun: easier said than done'. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: This study provides a nuanced insight into the lived experiences of individuals with CLE and their photoprotective practices. Taking care in the sun is not a simplistic process. Beyond the biomedical model of illness, the social impact that CLE has on individuals has a dominant influence on their photoprotective behaviours. Such insights could help healthcare professionals tailor photoprotective advice.

The behavior, attitude, and knowledge towards photoprotection in patients with cutaneous/systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparative study with 526 patients and healthy controls.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the attitude, knowledge, and behavior towards the sun protection in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients with and without cutaneous involvement (CLE) compared to non-photosensitive controls and to determine influential factors for photoprotective practices in SLE patients. METHODS: A case-control study was performed. Patients and controls completed a self-reported questionnaire. For SLE patients, the presence of organ involvement, disease activity and laboratory data were acquired from their physical examination and medical records. RESULTS: A total of 263 SLE patients and 263 healthy controls were recruited. SLE patients had statistically significant better photoprotective practices than controls, i.e. exposure to sunlight <1 hour per day (76.1% vs. 48.3%, OR, 3.40; 95% CI, 2.34-4.93, p < 0.001), less outdoor activities (9.8% vs. 19.1%, OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.71, p = 0.003), wore long-sleeved shirts (57.0% vs. 32.7%, OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.92-3.89, p < 0.001) and hats (43.8% vs. 26.6%, OR 2.14; 95% CI, 1.49-3.09, p < 0.001). SLE with CLE subgroup had the highest percentage for regular practice in almost all sun protective means compared to SLE without CLE and controls. SLE with CLE patients had more diligent sunscreen application with higher percentage of consistent use (93.7% vs. 59.3%, OR, 11.66; 95% CI, 2.57-52.89, p = 0.001) and adequate application (58.1% vs. 24.6%, OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.93-9.30, p < 0.001) compared to those without CLE. Previous and current CLE were influential factors for adherence to photoprotective methods, while the extracutaneous involvement was not. The majority of SLE patients were well acquainted with the harm of sunlight to their diseases (91.6%). However, 40.1% of them did not perceive that sunlight could escalate their internal flare, which may have led to inferior photoprotective practices in patients with extracutaneous involvement. CONCLUSION: SLE patients had good awareness and practiced better photoprotection than controls. The cutaneous sign is a predictor for superior photoprotective behavior. Education regarding the harms of sunlight and the importance of appropriate photoprotection should be emphasized, especially in SLE cases without cutaneous involvement.

A study of the significance of photoparoxysmal responses and spontaneous epileptiform discharges in the EEG in childhood epilepsy.

AIM: In clinical practice, there is a prevailing notion that photosensitivity mostly occurs in children with epilepsy (CWE) with idiopathic generalized epilepsy. We investigated the distribution of epilepsy types and etiology in photosensitive children and the associations with specific clinical and electroencephalogram (EEG) variables. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, clinical data were acquired from all children that showed photosensitivity during systematic intermittent photic stimulation (IPS), over a 10-year interval at a tertiary level Children's Hospital, Winnipeg. Patient demographics, EEG findings, and clinical data and symptoms during IPS were abstracted. Classification of diagnoses using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) 2017 guidelines was done by an expert panel. RESULTS: Seventy-eight photosensitive children were identified. Forty (51.3%) had generalized epilepsy (idiopathic: 27, structural: 2, other: 11) compared with 19 (24.4%) focal (idiopathic: 1, structural: 2, other: 16), 8 (10.3%) combined focal and generalized (structural: 4, other: 4), and 11 (14.1%) unknown epilepsy (other: 11); (χ2 (3) = 32.1, p = .000). Self-sustaining or outlasting photoparoxysmal responses (PPRs) occurred in association with all epilepsy types; however, the EEGs of focal CWE without treatment comprised almost solely of PPRs which outlasted the stimulus (8/10), in contrast to only 8/17 of focal CWE with treatment and to 13/26 of generalized epilepsy without treatment. Most frequency intervals in individual patients were less under treatment: a decrease in standardized photosensitivity range (SPR) was seen in 5 CWE, an increase in 2, and no change in 1 during treatment. Both CWE with focal and generalized epilepsy showed abnormal activity on EEG during hyperventilation (40% vs 65.7%). Thirteen out of 14 CWE with clinical signs during IPS had independent spontaneous epileptiform discharges (SEDs) in the EEG recording. CONCLUSION: Photosensitivity occurs in all types of epilepsy rather than in idiopathic generalized epilepsy alone. Surprisingly, there is a tendency for focal epilepsy to be associated with self-sustaining PPRs, especially when no treatment is used. Treatment tends to make the PPR more self-limiting and decrease the SPR. There is a tendency that clinical signs during IPS occur in EEGs in individuals with SEDs.

Evaluation of the minimal erythema dose for UVB and UVA in context of skin phototype and nature of photodermatosis.

BACKGROUND: Phototesting is part of the standard procedure for the evaluation of patients with photosensitivity disorders. The response of patients to targeted UVB or UVA radiation helps to find out more about the nature of photodermatosis. Nevertheless, there are no default values of the minimal erythema dose (MED). METHODS: This study evaluated data of 203 patients (131 female, 72 male, mean age 52 years) who were referred for phototesting to the University Hospital Zurich between 2012 and 2017. We retrospectively analyzed the demographic data, medical history, skin phototype, reaction to UVB and UVA radiation, and, if present, the diagnosis of photodermatosis. In patients who did not develop erythema at the highest tested UV doses, the next logical increment was taken for analysis. In case of UVA, the two periphery doses could not be evaluated due to technical issues, so the closest reliable UVA doses were used. RESULTS: The MED-UVB correlated with the skin type and increased with a higher phototype. No such correlation could be seen for MED-UVA. However, the MED-UVA was significantly reduced in patients with photodermatosis without significant differences between the subgroups of photodermatosis. More than half of the patients did not show a reduced MED despite a diagnosed photodermatosis. CONCLUSION: We showed, how different skin types with and without photodermatosis react to UV radiation. Based on the results, we suggested threshold doses that can be chosen for phototesting, presented which doses can be considered pathologic and showed the probability of a pathologic MED in correlation with a diagnosed photodermatosis.

Systemic drug photosensitivity-Culprits, impact and investigation in 122 patients.

BACKGROUND: Systemic drugs are a potentially reversible cause of photosensitivity. We explore prevalence, impact, phototest findings and culprit drugs. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients was diagnosed with drug-induced photosensitivity in a specialist photoinvestigation centre (2000-2016), using data recorded in standardized pro forma. Patients underwent detailed clinical evaluation. Monochromator phototesting was performed to 300 ± 5 nm, 320 ± 10 nm, 330 ± 10 nm, 350 ± 20 nm, 370 ± 20 nm, 400 ± 20 nm, 500 ± 20nm and 600 ± 20 nm. Broadband UVA and solar-simulated radiation (SSR) testing were performed, and photopatch testing and laboratory tests examined for other causes of photosensitivity. DLQI was evaluated. RESULTS: Prevalence of drug-induced photosensitivity was 5.4% (122/2243) patients presenting with photosensitivity. Patients with drug-induced photosensitivity were 52.5% female; median 62 years (range 11-86); phototype I (17.2%), II (39.3%), III (26.2%), IV (6.5%), V (4.1%). Fifty-five (45.1%) patients had reduced erythemal thresholds on monochromator phototesting: 83.6%% to UVA alone, 14.5% to both UVA and UVB, 1.8% to UVA and visible light; 61.4% (n = 75) showed abnormal response to broadband UVR. Drugs implicated: quinine (11.5%), diuretics (10.7%; thiazide 9.8%), antifungals (9.8%), proton-pump-inhibitors (9.8%), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (7.4%), anti-inflammatory drugs (6.6%), statins (5.7%), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (4.9%), calcium channel antagonists (3.3%), anti-epileptics (3.3%), tricyclic antidepressants (3.3%), beta-blockers (2.5%), antibiotics (2.5%), others (≤1.6% cases each). Emerging culprits included azathioprine (2.5%) and biologics (TNF-α inhibitors, denosumab; 2.5%). Median DLQI was 11 (range 2-27) for the past year. CONCLUSION: Classically described photosensitizing drugs such as thiazides and quinine remain common offenders, while emerging culprits include biologics such as TNF-a inhibitors and proton-pump-inhibitors. There is very large impact on life quality; identification facilitates measures including drug cessation and implementation of appropriate photoprotection.