An immunoassay cassette with a handheld reader for HIV urine testing in point-of-care diagnostics.

Currently, most HIV tests are performed with blood samples, or alternatively saliva samples are used for HIV testing. Simple HIV tests need to be performed in hospitals or other medical agencies instead of more invasive HIV blood tests. To enable point-of-care (POC) HIV diagnostics, based on a recently developed lateral flow strip for HIV urine testing, a microfluidic immunoassay cassette with a handheld optical reader is developed. Based on lateral flow strip with gold colloid reporter, the integrated immunoassay cassette can perform sample introduction, metering, discharging, applying and detection which simplifies HIV testing. An indicator is incorporated into the cassette to guide sample introduction based on color change, and further, the excess test sample is stored inside the sealed cassette to avoid any contamination. The low-cost handheld optical reader can provide a test result within a few seconds, which is useful for simple, sensitive and affordable HIV onsite detection. Instead of using normal white LEDs, a customized back light module embedded with green LEDs is adopted to illuminate the lateral flow strip with an appropriate working current to achieve optimal performance. Compared to the standard lateral flow strips using a benchtop reader, with the disposable immunoassay cassette assisted by the handheld optical reader, more convenient, easier-to-operate, and more affordable HIV urine testing can be achieved in POC diagnostics.

The Relationship between %BML, Urine Color, Thirst Level and Urine Indices of Hydration Status.

INTRODUCTION: Dehydration is known to impair health, quality of daily life, and exercise performance [1]. While several methods are utilized to assess fluid balance, there is no gold standard to assess hydration status [2]. Cheuvront and Kenefick [3] suggested the use of a Venn diagram, which consists of % body mass weight (BML), urine color, and thirst level (WUT) to measure hydration status and fluid needs. However, no study to date has examined the relationship between the WUT criteria and hydration status measured by urine indices. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between urine-specific gravity (USG), urine osmolality (UOSM), and the WUT criteria. METHODS: Twenty-two females (mean ± SD; age, 20 ± 1 year; weight, 65.4 ± 12.6 kg) and twenty-one males (age, 21 ± 1 year; body mass, 78.7 ± 14.6 kg) participated in this study. First-morning body mass, urine color, USG, UOSM, and thirst level were collected for 10 consecutive days. First 3 days were utilized to establish a euhydrated baseline body weight. %BML >1%, urine color >5, and thirst level ≥5 were used as the dehydration thresholds. The number of markers that indicated dehydration levels was summed when each variable met each threshold. One-way ANOVA with Tukey pairwise comparison was used to assess the differences in USG and UOSM, followed by a calculation of effect size (ES). RESULTS: Figure 1 indicates the differences of UOSM based on the WUT criteria. For UOSM, "2 markers indicated" (mean [M] ± SD [ES], 705 ± 253 mOsmol [0.43], p = 0.018) was significantly higher than "1 marker indicated" (M ± SD, 597 ± 253 mOsmol). Additionally, "zero marker indicated" (509 ± 249 mOsmol) was significantly lower than "3 markers indicated" (M ± SD [ES], 761 ± 250 mOsmol, [1.01], p = 0.02) and "2 markers indicated" ([ES], [0.78], p = 0.004). However, there was no statistical difference between "3 markers indicated" ([ES], [0.65], p = 0.13) and "1 marker indicated." For USG, "3 markers indicated" (M ± SD [ES], 1.021 ± 0.007 [0.57], p = 0.025) and "2 markers indicated" (M ± SD [ES], 1.019 ± 0.010 [0.31], p = 0.026) were significantly higher than "1 marker indicated" (M ± SD, 1.016 ± 0.009). Additionally, "zero marker indicated" (1.014 ± 0.005) was significantly lower than "3 markers indicated" ([ES], [1.21], p = 0.005) and "2 markers indicated" ([ES], [0.54], p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: When 3 markers indicated dehydration levels, UOSM and USG were greater than euhydrated cut points. When 2 markers indicated dehydration levels, USG was higher than the euhydrated cut point. Additionally, UOSM and USG were significantly lower when zero or 1 marker indicated dehydration levels. Thus, the WUT criteria are a useful tool to assess hydration status. Athletes, coaches, sports scientists, and medical professions can use this strategy in the field settings to optimize their performance and health without consuming money and time.